A Heggstad petition can help family members or trustees resolve situations where trust assets were never formally transferred into a trust despite clear intent to do so. At the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman we assist San Luis Obispo residents with the specific court procedures for confirming trust ownership when deeds, titles, or other conveyances were overlooked or improperly completed. This introduction explains why a Heggstad petition may be appropriate, how it fits within a broader estate plan that may include a revocable living trust, pour-over will, or other trust instruments, and what to expect when a petition is filed to reflect the settlor’s intended plan for asset distribution.
Many individuals create comprehensive estate plans that include a revocable living trust, a pour-over will, and supporting documents like powers of attorney and advance health care directives. When assets are intended to pass to the trust but title was not changed, beneficiaries or trustees can seek a judicial declaration that property belongs to the trust. This paragraph provides a concise overview of the practical steps involved, the typical timeline for trust-related litigation in San Luis Obispo County, and how careful documentation such as a general assignment to trust or certification of trust can streamline resolution and reduce family conflict in probate-related matters.
Filing a Heggstad petition can prevent unintended probate, preserve the settlor’s legacy, and clarify legal title for real estate or other assets that were meant to be governed by a trust. Resolving these issues in court establishes formal recognition of trust ownership which helps trustees administer assets according to the settlor’s instructions. This process can protect beneficiaries’ interests, reduce the risk of future disputes, and often makes subsequent transactions like sales or refinancing possible. The petition can be particularly beneficial where documentation is incomplete, where a pour-over will is part of the plan, or where an agent had authority but did not complete a transfer during the settlor’s lifetime.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman serves clients across California, offering focused representation in estate planning and trust administration matters, including Heggstad petitions. Our team handles a range of trust documents such as revocable living trusts, pour-over wills, certifications of trust, and assignments to trust. We guide trustees and beneficiaries through the procedural and evidentiary steps required by California courts to establish title to trust property. Clients in San Luis Obispo benefit from practical courtroom experience and a dedication to resolving disputes efficiently while protecting the settlor’s stated intentions and the family’s financial interests.
A Heggstad petition is a judicial proceeding used to declare that property is part of a trust when formal transfer paperwork is missing or incomplete. Courts will examine evidence such as the trust document, a pour-over will, deeds, settlement discussions, and actions taken by trustees or agents to determine whether the settlor intended the property to be held in trust. This evaluation focuses on the settlor’s intent and on equitable considerations. For many families, the petition is a practical remedy to ensure assets follow the trust plan and to avoid the delays and costs associated with a full probate administration.
The process typically requires collecting documentary evidence and preparing declarations from trustees, beneficiaries, or other witnesses who can attest to the settlor’s intent and to the circumstances that led to the missing transfer. Where deeds, titles, or transfer forms were not finalized, the court may nonetheless recognize the trust’s ownership based on the totality of the evidence. Filing a Heggstad petition is often coordinated with related filings such as a certification of trust or a general assignment of assets to trust. Early communication and organized documentation can speed the court’s review and reduce friction among interested parties.
A Heggstad petition asks the court to confirm that specific property belongs to a trust despite the lack of formal transfer documentation. Originating from case law, the petition permits a court to adjudicate title issues by assessing intent and related evidence. California judges will look for consistent indicia that the settlor intended trust ownership, such as transfer attempts, trust provisions referencing the asset, or actions by the trustee demonstrative of trust control. The court may then issue an order clarifying ownership, allowing trustees to manage or dispose of the asset in accordance with the trust’s terms.
Successful petitions depend on assembling persuasive documentation, including the trust instrument, deeds, correspondence, affidavits, and evidence of the settlor’s intent. Parties must draft clear pleadings describing the asset, the circumstances of the omitted transfer, and the legal basis for the court to recognize trust ownership. Notice to interested parties is typically required so those with competing claims can be heard. The court may hold a hearing where witnesses testify. Where the evidence supports trust ownership, the judge can issue an order quieting title or otherwise confirming the asset belongs to the trust, enabling proper administration without full probate.
Below are succinct definitions of common terms used in trust-related proceedings, including Heggstad petitions, trust assignments, and certifications of trust. These definitions explain how each document or concept fits into the process of transferring assets into a trust and resolving title issues. Understanding these terms can help trustees, beneficiaries, and family members better navigate discussions with counsel and prepare the evidence needed for court filings. Clear terminology also assists in anticipating potential objections and planning the most efficient approach to resolving property transfer gaps.
A revocable living trust is a foundational estate planning document that holds title to assets while the settlor is alive and specifies distribution after death. It is revocable during the settlor’s lifetime, often paired with a pour-over will to catch any assets not formally transferred. The trust names a trustee to manage trust property and provides instructions for successor trustees upon incapacity or death. When transfers into a trust are overlooked, a Heggstad petition may be used to ask the court to recognize that certain property was intended to belong to the trust despite missing formal conveyance documents.
A Heggstad petition is a specific court action that requests a judicial declaration that particular property belongs to a trust notwithstanding the absence of formal transfer documentation. The petition relies on evidence of intent, such as trust provisions, prior transfer attempts, or the conduct of trustees and agents. The court evaluates whether recognizing the trust’s interest would reflect the settlor’s true intentions and is equitable under the circumstances. If granted, the order can confirm title and enable the trustee to manage or transfer the asset according to the trust terms.
A pour-over will operates alongside a trust to ensure any assets not formally retitled into the trust during the settlor’s life are transferred to the trust at death. While a pour-over will can funnel assets into a trust, it may still require probate for assets that were not retitled, which is why a Heggstad petition can be valuable when deeds and titles were overlooked. The combination of a revocable living trust and a pour-over will aims to centralize asset management, but practical issues arise when formal transfers are not completed and court intervention becomes necessary.
A certification of trust is a summarized document that verifies the existence and key terms of a trust without disclosing confidential provisions. Financial institutions and title companies often accept a certification to evidence the trustee’s authority to act. When a Heggstad petition is filed, a certification of trust can support the trustee’s representation of trust ownership and authority to manage the asset in question. Using a certification may reduce the need to file full trust documents publicly, thereby maintaining privacy while proving the basic elements necessary for administrative or judicial recognition.
When assets intended for a trust remain in the settlor’s name, interested parties may consider multiple remedies including probate, a Heggstad petition, or nonjudicial transfer mechanisms when possible. Probate typically involves a court-supervised estate administration which can be time-consuming and public. A Heggstad petition seeks a targeted judicial declaration to recognize trust ownership without full probate, often saving time and expense. In some situations, parties can complete corrective conveyances or rely on bank procedures if institutions will accept a certification of trust or general assignment. Choosing the best path depends on the asset type, the clarity of evidence, and whether interested parties are cooperative.
A limited court filing can be appropriate when documentation plainly indicates the settlor intended the asset to be held in trust and the omission of formal transfer was an oversight. In such cases, a Heggstad petition that compiles the trust, relevant deeds, correspondence, and witness declarations can efficiently establish ownership. This approach avoids the more extensive procedures of probate and focuses the court’s attention on the specific asset at issue. It is often well-suited where beneficiaries agree on the outcome and the title issue is narrow in scope, reducing delay and expense for all parties.
Where trustees, beneficiaries, and other interested parties are cooperative and there are no significant competing claims, a Heggstad petition or administrative remedy may resolve title issues smoothly. Cooperation allows the parties to present concise evidence and narrow legal issues for the court, often avoiding contested hearings. This collaborative environment is beneficial for preserving family relationships and expediting the resolution. When parties are aligned, the process tends to be more predictable and less costly, though full preparation and notice are still required to ensure the court can make a clear declaration of trust ownership.
A comprehensive legal strategy becomes appropriate when multiple assets are affected or when documentation conflicts about ownership exist. Complex matters may involve real estate, retirement accounts, life insurance, and personal property, each governed by different transfer rules and institution requirements. In those situations, counsel can coordinate multiple filings, consider alternative statutory remedies, and prepare for contested hearings if necessary. Addressing every asset and potential claimant in a cohesive plan helps avoid piecemeal litigation and reduces the risk of future disputes over trust administration and distribution.
When beneficiaries disagree about asset ownership or when third parties assert competing claims, a more thorough legal approach is often required. Counsel can evaluate the merits of objections, develop evidence to rebut adverse positions, and represent the trustee or beneficiaries in contested hearings. The process may involve depositions, subpoenas, and expert testimony regarding title and intent. A comprehensive strategy addresses litigation risks and seeks resolutions that uphold the settlor’s observable intentions, protect assets from improper distribution, and provide clarity for future administration of the trust.
A comprehensive approach to resolving trust title issues brings clarity, consistency, and enforceable orders that prevent future disputes. By addressing all relevant assets, parties, and documents together, a coordinated plan reduces the chance that an overlooked item will later reopen litigation or require additional court involvement. The result can be a single, well-supported judicial determination or a set of coordinated administrative steps that ensure trusts operate as intended, allowing trustees to manage assets and beneficiaries to receive distributions without ongoing uncertainty or protracted estate litigation.
Comprehensive representation also helps with practical matters such as preparing certifications of trust, executing general assignments, and working with title companies or financial institutions to secure transactions. Thorough preparation anticipates potential objections and resolves issues before they escalate into contested proceedings. The coordinated approach often reduces cumulative cost and delay that results from multiple, disconnected filings. It also provides emotional benefits to families by offering a clear roadmap for administration and distribution that aligns with the settlor’s documented intentions and the trust’s terms.
A primary benefit of a comprehensive approach is minimizing the need for full probate administration by resolving title defects through targeted petitions or corrective transfers. Avoiding probate saves time, reduces public disclosure of family financial affairs, and can lower administrative costs. Coordinated actions like preparing a general assignment to trust or obtaining a court order recognizing trust ownership streamline property management and allow trustees to distribute assets according to the settlor’s wishes. This efficiency helps families focus on succession rather than prolonged asset disputes.
When courts issue orders or when trustees present well-prepared certifications of trust and supporting documents, financial institutions and title companies are more likely to accept instructions for account transfers, sales, or refinancing. Clear legal authority empowers trustees to act confidently, reduces delays caused by institutional requirements, and minimizes risk of liability for trustees acting in good faith. Achieving this clarity prevents future challenges and helps ensure transactions are completed without unnecessary administrative roadblocks or disputes among parties claiming conflicting rights.
Collecting the trust document, any deed or title records, pour-over will, correspondence, and records of attempted transfers is essential before filing a Heggstad petition. Documentation that shows the settlor’s intent, including declarations from trustees or witnesses, strengthens the petition. Financial institution statements, escrow records, and prior drafts of conveyance documents can be persuasive. Organizing these materials into a clear timeline helps clarify how and why formal transfer was not completed and supports the court’s review of the matter without unnecessary delay or repeated discovery requests.
Providing timely notice to beneficiaries and other interested parties and fostering open communication can reduce contention and improve the likelihood of a swift resolution. Early outreach allows parties to provide documents or raise concerns that can be addressed before litigation becomes necessary. When disputes are anticipated, transparent communication may lead to agreed orders or stipulated resolutions that avoid contested hearings. Clear notice and cooperative information sharing also help demonstrate to the court that all potential claimants were informed and had an opportunity to be heard, which can bolster the petition’s credibility.
Consider a Heggstad petition if assets intended for a trust were never retitled, if deeds or titles are missing or incomplete, or if a trustee needs legal clarity to manage or transfer property. This remedy is also appropriate when a pour-over will indicates trust intent but probate would otherwise be required, or when institutions refuse to accept a trustee’s authority without a court order. Filing a petition can confirm ownership for sale, refinancing, or distribution, avoiding the added time and expense of full probate and enabling trustees to carry out the settlor’s plan.
Another compelling reason to pursue this legal route is to reduce the likelihood of future litigation. A judicial declaration resolving title questions provides a definitive record that can deter later challenges. Families also benefit from the reduction in administrative burden and the avoidance of public probate proceedings. When multiple assets require correction or when documentation is complex, combining a Heggstad petition with other filings like general assignments to trust or trust certifications helps ensure a holistic resolution that supports orderly administration and preserves estate assets for beneficiaries.
Typical circumstances include real estate left in the settlor’s name, bank accounts not retitled, or an agent who promised transfers but did not complete them. Other common scenarios involve transfers attempted shortly before death, administrative oversights during estate settlement, or conflicting deeds recorded after the settlor’s intent was clear. In each case, a Heggstad petition can be used to present evidence of intent and to request a judicial declaration recognizing the trust’s ownership that reflects the settlor’s estate planning goals.
Real estate often becomes the subject of Heggstad petitions when the settlor intended to move property into a revocable living trust but the deed remained in the settlor’s name. Title companies may require a court order to clear title for sale or refinancing, and a Heggstad petition can provide that order by showing the settlor’s intent to fund the trust. Gathering deeds, trust pages referencing the property, and witness statements helps the court determine that the property should be recognized as trust property and supports a straightforward legal resolution.
Sometimes bank or investment accounts are not retitled into the name of the trustee during the settlor’s life, even though statements or beneficiary designations were intended to reflect trust ownership. Financial institutions may be reluctant to accept trustee instructions without either a certification of trust or a court order. A Heggstad petition can establish the trust’s interest and persuade institutions to recognize the trustee’s authority, facilitating account transfers, distributions to beneficiaries, or necessary transactions without resorting to probate.
When an agent acting under a power of attorney or a trustee attempted to transfer assets but did not complete the formal steps required for title transfer, a Heggstad petition can resolve the resulting ownership gap. Evidence such as signed but unrecorded documents, correspondence with escrow or title companies, and declarations explaining the attempted transfer can be persuasive. Courts review the totality of circumstances to determine whether the settlor intended the asset to be trust property and may issue an order reflecting that intent to allow proper trust administration.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provides local representation for San Luis Obispo residents facing trust title issues, including Heggstad petitions and related filings. We assist with document preparation, evidence collection, and court pleadings needed to resolve ownership disputes and confirm trust assets. Our approach focuses on practical solutions that preserve the settlor’s plan, minimize expense, and reduce family stress. Clients receive clear communication about timelines, procedural requirements, and likely outcomes to help them make informed decisions during what can be an emotionally challenging time.
Selecting counsel experienced in trust administration and California trust litigation can make a meaningful difference in resolving title issues efficiently. We work with clients to assemble strong evidentiary records, prepare persuasive pleadings, and coordinate with title companies, financial institutions, and other interested parties. Our goal is to secure an enforceable court order or administrative resolution that allows trustees to manage or distribute assets under the trust’s terms, protecting beneficiary rights while preserving the privacy and intent of the settlor’s estate plan.
We also emphasize practical planning to prevent future problems by reviewing existing estate planning documents and recommending corrective actions such as proper retitling, executing general assignments to trust, or preparing certifications of trust for institutional use. This proactive work reduces the need for litigation later and helps ensure that a settlor’s intentions are carried out smoothly. When litigation is necessary, we advocate for solutions that minimize cost and delay while seeking to maintain family relationships whenever possible.
Throughout the process, clients receive clear guidance on the procedural steps, required evidence, and realistic timelines for court proceedings in San Luis Obispo County. We maintain open lines of communication to keep clients informed and involved in strategic decisions. Our representation integrates document preparation with court advocacy, helping trustees and beneficiaries move from uncertainty to a legally enforceable resolution that aligns with the settlor’s documented wishes and the overall estate plan.
Our process begins with a thorough intake to identify the asset, review the trust and related documents, and determine the best procedural path. We conduct targeted discovery when necessary, prepare declarations and exhibits to demonstrate the settlor’s intent, and file the petition with appropriate notices to interested parties. We work with title companies and financial institutions as needed and prepare for hearings when contested issues arise. The goal is to obtain a clear judicial order or administrative acceptance that allows trustees to manage or distribute assets in accordance with the trust.
The first critical step is compiling all documents and evidence that show the settlor intended the asset to belong to the trust. This includes the trust instrument, deeds, correspondence, bank statements, escrow records, powers of attorney, and any attempted conveyances. We also identify potential witnesses and prepare declarations to explain the circumstances. A well-organized evidentiary package strengthens the Heggstad petition, streamlines the court’s review, and can reduce the likelihood of protracted discovery or contested hearings.
Identifying the relevant trust provisions and compiling any supporting paperwork is essential. We ensure the trust document is current, locate associated instruments such as pour-over wills and certification of trust forms, and verify names, dates, and asset descriptions. Where documents are incomplete, we seek other records that corroborate intent. This thorough preparation helps the court understand how the asset fits within the overall estate plan and reduces the risk of challenges to the petition based on gaps in documentary evidence.
Bank statements, escrow communications, title company notes, and third-party declarations can provide crucial corroboration. We obtain these records through client collections or formal requests when necessary, and prepare witness declarations that explain the attempted transfers, conversations, and actions taken by trustees or agents. The combined documentary and testimonial record gives the court a complete picture of the circumstances surrounding the omitted transfer and supports the request to recognize trust ownership.
After assembling the evidentiary record, we prepare the Heggstad petition and supporting declarations, ensuring the pleading complies with local rules and provides clear notice to all interested parties. The filing will articulate the legal basis for the requested relief, describe the asset, and attach exhibits demonstrating intent. Proper service and notice are essential to avoid later procedural challenges and to allow potentially affected parties the opportunity to respond or appear in the proceeding.
The petition should concisely explain the factual history and legal grounds for recognizing the trust’s interest. We focus on clarity, attaching all relevant exhibits and ensuring declarations address likely evidentiary questions. Clear pleadings reduce the court’s need for supplemental filings and help avoid unnecessary continuances. This careful drafting increases the chance of a favorable and timely resolution, whether by order following an uncontested submission or after a court hearing when issues are disputed.
Proper service of the petition on beneficiaries, heirs, and other interested parties is a procedural necessity. We handle the service process and monitor responses, preparing legal arguments and additional evidence to address any objections that arise. If disputes develop, we participate in hearings and present the evidentiary record. When objections are reasonable, we explore settlements or stipulated orders to resolve matters without protracted litigation, always aiming to uphold the settlor’s documented intentions while protecting the rights of all parties.
Following the petition and response period, the court may schedule a hearing to evaluate the evidence. At hearing, witness declarations and documentary exhibits are considered, and a judge may issue an order recognizing trust ownership or directing corrective measures. After the order, we assist with implementing the court’s directives, such as recording corrected deeds, providing the order to title companies, or updating account registrations. Post-order actions ensure the practical results of the judgment are realized for trustee administration and beneficiary distribution.
When a hearing is necessary, we present a focused evidentiary case showing the settlor’s intent and explaining why the court should recognize trust ownership despite missing formal transfers. The judge’s order will describe the court’s findings and provide a legal basis for the trustee’s authority. Securing a clear order resolves title ambiguities and provides legal protection for trustees acting under the court’s direction, enabling efficient management, sale, or distribution of trust assets as intended by the settlor.
Once the court issues an order, we coordinate with county recorders, title companies, and financial institutions to update records and complete transactions. This may involve recording a corrective deed, presenting the court order to a bank to retitle accounts, or using a general assignment to trust to transfer personal property. Implementing the court’s order ensures the trustee has recognized legal title for management and distribution, and that beneficiaries receive the assets according to the trust’s provisions without further legal impediments.
A Heggstad petition is a court action asking a judge to declare that particular property belongs to a trust even though formal title transfer paperwork was not completed. Courts examine evidence of the settlor’s intent, such as the trust instrument, deeds, correspondence, or actions by trustees and agents, and may issue an order recognizing trust ownership based on the totality of the circumstances. This remedy helps correct gaps that would otherwise require probate or cause difficulty in asset management. Filing is appropriate when an asset was intended to be held by a trust but remains in the settlor’s name, when institutions refuse to accept trustee authority, or when a pour-over will indicates trust intent but probate would be needed absent court recognition. The petition focuses on clarifying ownership so trustees can administer or distribute assets according to the trust’s terms.
The timeline varies depending on the complexity of the matters, the number of interested parties, and the court’s calendar. In straightforward, uncontested cases with clear documentation, a Heggstad petition may be resolved within a few months. When discovery is needed or objections are filed, the process can extend to many months or longer. Local court schedules and procedural requirements can influence timing significantly. Early preparation of a complete evidentiary record and cooperative parties can shorten the process. Ensuring accurate service and promptly responding to institutional requests also helps move matters along. We advise clients on realistic timelines and work to minimize delay while protecting legal rights.
Courts look for persuasive evidence that demonstrates the settlor intended the property to be governed by the trust. Useful materials include the trust document itself, deeds or other instruments that reference the trust, correspondence showing transfer intent, bank or escrow records, and declarations from trustees or witnesses describing the settlor’s actions and statements. The more consistent and corroborative the evidence, the stronger the petition. Where documentary proof is limited, credible witness testimony and other circumstantial evidence can still support a petition. The court evaluates the totality of circumstances, focusing on the settlor’s intent and equitable considerations, to determine whether recognizing the trust’s interest reflects the settlor’s wishes.
A Heggstad petition can often avoid the need for full probate for a particular asset by obtaining a court declaration that the asset is trust property. However, whether probate is avoided entirely depends on the types and extent of assets involved and whether other assets require probate administration under separate circumstances. The petition addresses title for specified items and can reduce the amount of property passing through probate. When multiple assets remain unretitled or when there are contested claims, additional proceedings may still be necessary. A comprehensive review of the estate plan and affected assets helps determine whether the petition alone is sufficient to avoid probate or whether additional filings are advisable.
Yes. When a court issues an order recognizing property as trust property, the trustee gains legal authority to manage, transfer, or sell the asset according to the trust’s terms. The order provides the documentation that institutions and title companies typically require to accept trustee instructions, enabling transactions like sales or refinances to proceed. Implementing the order may require recording deeds or presenting the court order to a bank or escrow company. After obtaining the order, trustees should follow its instructions and ensure compliance with any conditions the court imposes. Properly implementing the court’s directive helps protect trustees from later claims and ensures assets are distributed or managed in line with the settlor’s documented wishes.
Costs vary based on the complexity of the case, the amount of evidence required, court filing fees, and whether contested proceedings are necessary. Uncontested petitions with clear records will generally be less expensive than contested matters requiring depositions, extensive discovery, or multiple hearings. Additional expenses may include fees for obtaining certified records, title work, and recording corrected deeds after obtaining a court order. We provide clients with estimates tailored to their situation and discuss strategies to limit cost, such as gathering complete documentation early and seeking stipulated resolutions when possible. The overall goal is efficient resolution that preserves estate value and minimizes unnecessary expense.
If an heir or third party objects, the court will consider the objection along with the petitioner’s evidence. Objections can raise factual disputes about intent or legal arguments about the appropriate remedy. The court may require additional discovery, evidentiary hearings, or briefing before ruling. Objecting parties have the right to be heard, and the process can become more complex when disputes are vigorously contested. When objections arise, we evaluate the merits of the challenges, gather rebuttal evidence, and advocate for a resolution that reflects the settlor’s intent. Settlement discussions or stipulated orders can sometimes resolve disagreements without protracted litigation, but if necessary we present the strongest possible case at hearing.
Heggstad petitions are typically used for property that requires a court declaration of trust ownership, such as real property or accounts where title issues exist. Retirement accounts and life insurance proceeds often pass by beneficiary designation rather than by retitling, and those designations control distribution unless contested. If a beneficiary designation is inconsistent with a trust or if the institution refuses to accept a trust arrangement, other remedies or litigation may be necessary to clarify rights. Each type of asset can present unique issues, so we review the specifics of retirement and insurance contracts and work with plan administrators or insurers to determine the best approach. In some cases, administrative resolutions or beneficiary change procedures resolve the matter without a Heggstad petition.
A certification of trust is often sufficient for financial institutions and title companies to accept trustee authority for administrative actions without disclosing the full trust document. It provides essential information about the trust and the trustee’s authority while preserving privacy. Many banks and title companies will process transfers or account changes when presented with a properly prepared certification of trust, reducing the need for court filings in routine circumstances. However, when the institution refuses to accept a certification or when title disputes involve conflicting claims, a court order obtained through a Heggstad petition may be necessary. We evaluate whether a certification will suffice or whether court recognition is the more reliable path to achieve the client’s objectives.
Preventing the need for a Heggstad petition starts with thorough estate planning practices: retitle real estate and accounts to the trust name when appropriate, review beneficiary designations for consistency with the trust, and prepare a certification of trust for use with institutions. Regular reviews of the estate plan and coordination with title and financial institutions can catch potential issues before they require court involvement. Clear communication with successors, trustees, and agents about transfer responsibilities and maintaining accurate records of executed conveyances also helps avoid problems. When transfers are completed promptly and documentation is kept organized, the likelihood of needing a judicial declaration to correct title is significantly reduced.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas