A general assignment of assets to a trust is a mechanism used in estate planning to transfer ownership of certain property into a living trust without moving title immediately for every item. This approach can simplify administration by providing a written transfer that assigns assets to the trust now, to be managed according to the trust terms. For residents of Shandon and San Luis Obispo County, using a general assignment alongside documents like a revocable living trust and pour-over will helps ensure continuity and reduces the likelihood of probate. This paragraph outlines what that document does and how it fits into a broader estate plan.
Many clients choose a general assignment of assets to trust as part of a comprehensive estate plan that includes a last will and testament, financial power of attorney, and advance health care directive. The general assignment can address tangible personal property and other assets that are not retitled immediately, allowing those assets to be treated as trust property when necessary. By combining this document with a certification of trust and pour-over will, individuals in Shandon can create a durable plan to manage assets during incapacity and distribute property at death. This paragraph explains the typical role of the assignment in routine planning.
A general assignment of assets to trust matters because it provides a clear, written method for designating assets as trust property without the need to retitle every item immediately. This can reduce administrative burden for families and trustees, streamline management of household goods and miscellaneous personal property, and reduce confusion about ownership during incapacity or after death. In practice, the assignment works with other estate planning documents such as revocable living trusts and pour-over wills to centralize asset control. For Shandon residents, it can mean a smoother transition when assets must be managed or distributed and it supports practical planning for everyday property.
Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman serves clients across California with a focus on clear, practical estate planning solutions. Our approach emphasizes thorough documents such as revocable living trusts, last wills and testaments, powers of attorney, and general assignments of assets to trust. We aim to explain options in plain language and prepare plans that reflect client priorities for asset management, incapacity planning, and legacy considerations, including special needs, pet trusts, and Heggstad petitions when relevant. Clients in Shandon and surrounding areas appreciate straightforward guidance tailored to local needs and California law.
A general assignment of assets to a trust is a document that lists a grantor’s intent to transfer certain property to a named trust, often as part of a package of estate planning instruments. The assignment commonly covers personal property and items that are not easily retitled at the time the trust is created. It functions together with a certification of trust and pour-over will to ensure assets are treated as trust property when the trustee administers the estate. In California, careful drafting is important to meet statutory requirements and reflect how the grantor wants assets to be handled during life and after death.
When preparing a general assignment of assets to trust, it is important to consider what assets will be included, how the assignment interacts with beneficiary designations and retirement account trusts, and whether additional documents such as an irrevocable life insurance trust or retirement plan trust are needed. The assignment does not necessarily negate the need to update deeds or account registrations where appropriate, but it can reduce the immediate administrative burden. For households with items like family heirlooms, collections, or personal effects, the assignment clarifies intent and supports efficient trust administration when the time comes.
A general assignment of assets to trust is a written declaration by which a grantor assigns certain personal property and other specified assets to a trust entity created by a trust instrument. It is not a substitute for changing title on real estate or retitling financial accounts where formal transfer is required, but it serves as a catchall for miscellaneous or tangible property that might otherwise be overlooked. The assignment clarifies the grantor’s intent that such items be governed by the trust terms, assisting the trustee and family members in identifying trust assets and simplifying distribution according to the grantor’s wishes under California trust administration rules.
Key elements of a general assignment include identification of the grantor, clear reference to the trust to receive assets, a description of the classes of property being assigned, and signature and notarization consistent with California formalities. The process normally involves reviewing existing holdings to determine which items can be assigned by document rather than retitled, coordinating the assignment with a pour-over will and trust funding plan, and providing the trustee with copies and instructions for administration. Proper documentation helps prevent disputes and ensures the trustee can locate and manage assigned property efficiently when needed.
Understanding the vocabulary used in trust assignments makes it easier to see how the document functions. Terms such as grantor, trustee, beneficiary, pour-over will, trust funding, certification of trust, and Heggstad petition frequently arise in this context. Each term defines a role or process: the grantor creates the trust, the trustee manages it, beneficiaries receive distributions, and the pour-over will transfers residuary assets to the trust. A certification of trust provides trustees with proof of authority without revealing trust details. These concepts work together to facilitate orderly management and transfer of assigned assets.
A grantor is the individual who establishes a trust and transfers assets into it. The grantor selects the trustee and beneficiaries and defines the trust terms that govern asset management and distributions. In the context of a general assignment, the grantor signs the assignment to indicate the intent to transfer designated personal property to the trust. This role includes the responsibility to create clear documentation and to coordinate other estate planning instruments, such as a pour-over will or powers of attorney, so that the grantor’s overall plan reflects their wishes and reduces uncertainty for family members and successors in trust administration.
The trustee is the person or entity charged with managing trust assets in accordance with the trust document and applicable law. When a general assignment designates assets as trust property, the trustee becomes responsible for protecting, accounting for, and distributing those assets according to the trust terms. Trustees have fiduciary duties to beneficiaries, including duties of loyalty, prudence, and impartiality, and must follow statutory requirements for notice and recordkeeping. Clear assignments and supporting documentation make it easier for trustees to fulfill these responsibilities without delay or dispute.
A pour-over will is a testamentary document that directs any assets not held in the trust at death to be transferred into the trust to be administered according to its terms. This tool complements a general assignment by providing a safety net for assets that were unintentionally omitted or could not be retitled before the grantor’s death. The pour-over will typically works with a revocable living trust and ensures that the grantor’s overall estate plan remains cohesive, allowing the trustee to distribute those assets under the trust provisions and potentially avoid or limit probate complications when integrated with the trust funding strategy.
A Heggstad petition is a legal request filed in California probate court to demonstrate that certain assets should be treated as trust property despite being titled in the name of the decedent at death. This petition can be used when a trust was intended to own assets but formal transfer was not completed, and it allows the court to recognize the trust’s ownership so assets can be administered under trust terms. A general assignment and proper supporting evidence can reduce the need for such proceedings, but when disputes arise, a Heggstad petition provides a remedy for validating the grantor’s intent and facilitating trust-based distribution.
There are several ways to move assets into a trust, each with different implications for administration, cost, and legal formality. Retitling deeds and accounts provides clear ownership changes but can be time consuming. Beneficiary designations and payable-on-death designations transfer specific accounts directly. A general assignment covers miscellaneous personal property that may be impractical to retitle. A pour-over will covers remaining probate assets. Choosing the right combination depends on the types of assets, the grantor’s goals for privacy and control, and the desire to minimize probate and administrative delays. A balanced plan often includes multiple measures working together.
A limited approach to funding a trust may suit individuals with relatively few or simple assets where the cost and effort of retitling property outweigh the benefit. For example, if a household has minimal personal property, limited financial accounts, and straightforward beneficiary designations, relying on a pour-over will combined with a general assignment might adequately capture assets without extensive retitling. In such cases, the plan should still ensure that key documents like financial powers of attorney and advance health care directives are in place to manage incapacity and to support orderly administration under the trust if needed.
A limited approach can also be appropriate when the grantor is making interim arrangements pending a larger retitling project or pending significant life changes. For instance, if the trust is newly created and the grantor intends to retitle real property or accounts later, a general assignment can function as an interim measure to ensure miscellaneous belongings are included in the trust plan. This allows the grantor to proceed with a workable plan now while scheduling the more time-consuming retitling tasks at a later, more convenient time, helping maintain continuity of the estate plan.
Comprehensive planning becomes important for individuals with complex asset portfolios, multiple financial accounts, real property, business interests, retirement accounts, or special needs planning concerns. When assets are varied and numerous, consistent retitling and review of beneficiary designations help ensure that the trust truly controls the estate and that unintended probate or tax issues are avoided. A robust approach coordinates assignments, deeds, account transfers, and beneficiary reviews to align asset ownership with the trust and the grantor’s broader objectives, reducing administrative burdens later and clarifying the plan for trustees and beneficiaries.
When family dynamics create a higher risk of disagreement over asset distribution, a comprehensive approach to funding and documentation reduces ambiguity and lowers the chance of post-death disputes. Clear retitling, detailed trust provisions, updated beneficiary designations, and carefully drafted assignments provide evidence of intent and reduce opportunities for misunderstanding. For families with blended members, dependents with special needs, or assets that might be contested, a complete strategy offers clarity and predictable outcomes, facilitating smoother administration and helping preserve relationships by minimizing contested matters during an emotional time.
A comprehensive approach to assigning assets to a trust helps ensure that the grantor’s wishes are followed with minimal court involvement and administrative delay. By retitling major assets where appropriate, using beneficiary designations for accounts that allow them, and employing a general assignment for miscellaneous property, the estate plan becomes more coherent and easier to administer. This strategy improves continuity of management during incapacity, clarifies what belongs to the trust, and reduces the risk that significant assets will inadvertently be left to probate. The result is more predictable outcomes for families and trustees.
Another key benefit of a comprehensive plan is improved recordkeeping and documentation that supports the trustee’s duties and facilitates timely distribution to beneficiaries. When assets are clearly identified and instructions are in place, trustees can act with confidence, provide required notices, and manage estate administration efficiently. This reduces time and potential costs for heirs, helps avoid disputes, and supports privacy by keeping matters out of court when possible. A clear, organized funding plan provides peace of mind by aligning practical steps with the grantor’s objectives for legacy and care of dependents.
When assets are properly assigned and retitled to a living trust, the need for probate can be minimized because the trust controls distribution and management of assets. This reduces administrative delay and often simplifies the transfer process for heirs. A general assignment complements retitling by capturing items that are not transferred in title, helping to ensure the trust receives all intended property. Together, these measures make administration more efficient and reduce the likelihood of contested probate proceedings, leading to faster, clearer outcomes for beneficiaries and fiduciaries handling the estate.
A comprehensive funding plan enhances clarity by documenting the grantor’s intentions and making it easier for trustees and family members to identify trust assets and follow distribution instructions. Detailed records and consistent titling reduce uncertainty about ownership and help prevent disputes over personal effects or overlooked accounts. Clear instructions combined with powers of attorney and health care directives ensure there is continuity in decision making during incapacity, and the trust provisions guide distribution at death. This level of organization supports orderly administration and aligns legal and practical steps with personal wishes.
Creating an inventory of personal property before completing a general assignment helps ensure nothing important is overlooked. Take time to list household items, heirlooms, collections, and other tangible belongings, noting approximate values and intended recipients when helpful. This inventory serves as a reference for the trustee, reduces the chance that items will be disputed, and complements the assignment document. Keep a copy with other estate planning records and update it when new significant items are acquired or when distribution wishes change so the assignment remains aligned with current intentions.
Providing the successor trustee with copies of the general assignment, inventory, trust document, pour-over will, and contact information reduces delays if immediate action is needed. Store originals and copies in secure locations while making sure the trustee knows where to find them. Documentation such as account statements and receipts that support ownership claims can speed administration and limit disputes. Regularly updating these records and confirming that the successor trustee understands the plan ensures continuity and helps trustees fulfill their duties effectively when the time comes.
There are several reasons someone might include a general assignment in their estate plan. It provides a simple way to ensure that everyday personal property and certain assets not retitled immediately are included in the trust, offering clearer guidance for trustees and heirs. It can function as an interim measure while more formal retitling is completed and acts as a practical safeguard to capture items that might otherwise be left to probate. For households in Shandon with varied personal belongings and modest administrative resources, a general assignment can offer meaningful organizational benefit.
Another reason to use a general assignment is to coordinate family expectations and reduce uncertainty. By documenting the intent to assign specified categories of property to the trust, the grantor communicates plans for distribution and management. This reduces the risk of disputes, supports efficient administration, and helps trustees locate and manage assigned items. When combined with a comprehensive estate planning portfolio that includes a living trust, financial powers of attorney, and healthcare directives, the general assignment becomes part of a cohesive plan for incapacity and end-of-life transitions.
A general assignment is often helpful for seniors downsizing their household, parents setting a plan for distributing heirlooms, owners of personal collections, and individuals who want to ensure that household items are treated as trust property without immediate re-titling. It can also assist in situations where property is hard to retitle, where accounts have complex ownership structures, or when a grantor needs a practical interim solution while completing a larger retitling project. The assignment simplifies identification of trust assets for trustees and supports a smoother transition of property under trust terms.
When households downsize or relocate, a general assignment can address items that may be sold, stored, or distributed and helps ensure that remaining personal property is accounted for within the trust. During a move, it is common for paperwork and title changes to be delayed; the assignment provides a written record that designated items are intended to be trust property. This reduces confusion for family members and the trustee and supports efficient administration later, particularly if the grantor moves across counties or updates other estate plan components during the transition.
Family heirlooms and personal effects are often not retitled but carry significant sentimental and monetary value. A general assignment allows the grantor to place these items within the trust framework so the trustee and beneficiaries understand they are part of the estate plan. Documenting intent reduces the risk of items being overlooked or contested and provides a clear path for distribution. This is particularly important when heirlooms are intended for specific family members or when the grantor wants to ensure consistent handling of sentimental pieces over time.
When a grantor plans to retitle real estate or many accounts but anticipates delays due to logistics or timing, a general assignment serves as a practical interim tool to include miscellaneous property in the trust structure. This avoids leaving items unintentionally outside the trust and provides continuity while the larger retitling project is completed. Providing instructions and an inventory with the assignment allows the successor trustee to recognize and administer those assets according to the trust, reducing the need for immediate court involvement and supporting orderly transitions.
Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provides estate planning services tailored to residents of Shandon and throughout San Luis Obispo County. Our practice includes preparation of revocable living trusts, general assignments of assets to trust, pour-over wills, advanced directives, and associated documents that make up a comprehensive plan. We assist clients with practical steps such as preparing inventories, coordinating retitling where appropriate, and ensuring that trustees have the required documentation to administer trusts efficiently. Call or reach out to discuss practical planning steps for your situation.
Clients choose Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman for clear, practical estate planning that addresses both everyday needs and more complex situations. We prepare detailed general assignments and coordinated trust packages that work with other planning documents to reduce uncertainty. Our focus is on thorough documentation and understandable advice so clients can make informed choices about funding their trusts and protecting their families. For residents of Shandon and surrounding communities, our approach aims to balance legal requirements with practical administration considerations to create durable, usable plans.
The firm assists with preparing supporting materials such as inventories, certification of trust forms for trustees, and guidance on when retitling is advisable versus when a general assignment suffices. We help clients review retirement account beneficiary designations and understand how assignments and pour-over wills interact with other documents. This coordination minimizes gaps that could cause assets to be overlooked and helps trustees manage transitions smoothly. Our goal is to implement plans that reflect values, family considerations, and practical needs for managing assets during life and after death.
We also provide guidance on addressing special planning needs, such as trusts for dependents with disabilities, pet trusts, and life insurance trust arrangements, and we assist when petitions like Heggstad or trust modification petitions become necessary. Our practice includes preparing durable powers of attorney and HIPAA authorizations to ensure continuity of decision making during incapacity. By integrating a general assignment into a full estate planning portfolio, clients gain a comprehensive set of tools designed to protect assets and provide for beneficiaries in a predictable manner.
Our process begins with a focused intake to understand the client’s assets, family situation, and planning goals. We review deeds, account registrations, beneficiary designations, and any special needs planning considerations, and then recommend a combination of retitling, beneficiary updates, or a general assignment as appropriate. We draft clear documents, provide inventories and certification forms, and explain practical next steps for delivering documents to trustees and advisors. The goal is to create a coherent plan that is easy to use during incapacity and reliable at the time of distribution.
The first step is a comprehensive review of the client’s assets and existing estate planning documents to determine what should be assigned or retitled and which beneficiary designations should be updated. We work with clients to develop an inventory of tangible personal property and to identify accounts that may require formal retitling or beneficiary changes. This step provides the factual basis for drafting a general assignment and coordinating the assignment with the trust, pour-over will, and other supporting documents to ensure the plan functions as intended.
We assist clients in gathering deeds, account statements, titles, and existing estate documents, and we ask for details about personal property and desired distribution. Having thorough documentation reduces later questions about ownership and makes it easier to decide which assets should be retitled and which can be covered by assignment. This collection phase also identifies potential issues such as jointly owned assets or accounts with outdated beneficiary designations that may need attention to align with the trust plan.
After collecting information, we evaluate whether assets should be retitled to the trust, left with updated beneficiary designations, or included in a general assignment. Factors include the type of asset, ease of retitling, potential tax implications, and the grantor’s preferences. We explain the trade-offs and recommend a practical approach tailored to the client, balancing administrative effort and the desire to minimize probate, while ensuring that the trustee will have clear authority to manage and distribute assigned property as part of the trust administration process.
In this phase we prepare the general assignment, trust amendments if needed, pour-over will, powers of attorney, and any additional documents such as HIPAA authorizations or certification of trust. Drafting focuses on clear language that reflects the grantor’s intent and California legal requirements. We include supporting materials like inventories and instructions for the successor trustee. Documents are reviewed with the client to confirm accuracy and intent before signing, and we provide guidance on notarization, witnessing, and storage to ensure the documents are legally effective and accessible when needed.
Clients review draft documents to confirm that the assignment and related instruments reflect their wishes. During this review we discuss distribution preferences, identify any necessary clarifications, and ensure coordination with retirement account beneficiaries and insurance policies. This step provides an opportunity to make adjustments and to finalize the inventory and supporting materials so the trustee will have clear direction. We answer client questions and make revisions until the client is satisfied with the plan and ready to proceed to execution.
Once documents are finalized, we guide the client through proper execution and notarization procedures required in California. We advise on who should hold original documents, how trustees will access them, and options for secure storage. We also recommend providing copies to the successor trustee, along with the inventory and certification of trust, to reduce delays. Proper safekeeping ensures that the general assignment and trust documents will be available when needed for administration and helps prevent unnecessary court involvement.
After execution, we assist clients with implementing the plan, which may include retitling key assets, updating beneficiary designations, and delivering documents to financial institutions when appropriate. We encourage periodic reviews to account for life changes such as marriage, divorce, births, acquisitions, or relocations that may affect the plan. Regular review helps keep the assignment and overall trust funding effective and aligned with current wishes. We remain available to prepare modifications, trust amendments, or petitions if circumstances require legal action to reflect changing needs.
Coordination with banks, brokerage firms, and title companies may be necessary to complete retitling for certain accounts or properties. We assist clients by providing the required certification of trust or other documentation and by advising on institution-specific procedures. This cooperation reduces friction when transferring assets and helps ensure financial institutions recognize the trustee’s authority. Proper communication and documentation facilitate a smooth funding process and reduce the chance that assets will be mistakenly excluded from the trust at a later date.
Estate plans are not one-time transactions; they require periodic maintenance to stay current with life events and changes in assets. We recommend regular check-ins to confirm beneficiary designations remain aligned, to add or change assignments when property is acquired or disposed of, and to consider trust modifications if circumstances or laws change. Ongoing attention ensures that the general assignment and related documents remain effective and that the trust continues to serve the grantor’s goals for asset management and distribution over time.
A general assignment is a written declaration assigning certain personal property and other taxable or nontitled items to a trust and serves as a practical way to include those items within the trust framework. It is often used for household goods, personal effects, and items that are impractical to retitle individually. The assignment provides a clear record of the grantor’s intent that such items be governed by the trust and supports the trustee in identifying and administering those assets when necessary. When incorporated with a revocable living trust and a pour-over will, the assignment becomes part of a cohesive estate plan designed to minimize uncertainty. While it helps capture miscellaneous items, it does not replace retitling for assets that require formal transfer, and careful coordination with beneficiary designations and account registrations is still recommended to ensure all significant assets are treated as intended.
A general assignment can reduce the likelihood that miscellaneous personal property will end up in probate, but it does not automatically avoid probate for all assets. Assets such as real property, certain financial accounts, and retirement plans may require retitling or beneficiary updates to avoid probate. The assignment is most effective when combined with a comprehensive funding plan that includes retitling, beneficiary reviews, and a pour-over will to catch any assets that remain outside the trust at death. To truly minimize probate, it is important to review each asset type and take the appropriate action for each. Updating account registrations and deed transfers when possible, alongside the general assignment, will provide the strongest protection against probate and support smoother administration for trustees and heirs.
Retitling property into a trust involves changing the legal ownership record for an asset so that the trust appears as the owner, which provides clear proof of trust ownership. A general assignment, by contrast, is a document that assigns ownership intent to the trust for items that are not retitled, such as household goods or personal effects. The assignment is a useful complement to retitling because it captures items that would otherwise be left out but does not change formal ownership records where those changes are required. Choosing between retitling and assignment depends on the type of asset, cost and practicality of making title changes, and the grantor’s goals. In many cases a combination of approaches provides the best balance between reducing probate exposure and managing administrative workload.
Yes, a general assignment commonly includes items of sentimental value, such as family heirlooms, artwork, or collections, especially when those items are not easily retitled. Including such items in the assignment clarifies that they are intended to be trust property and provides direction for trustees on distribution wishes. Accompanying documentation like an inventory with descriptions and recipient preferences helps ensure these items are handled according to the grantor’s intentions and reduces the chance of disputes among family members. While the assignment can document intent for sentimental items, it can also be helpful to include specific bequests in a will or add instructions within the trust for highly valued pieces. This layered approach provides extra clarity and helps trustees administer distributions in a way that respects family expectations.
A pour-over will remains useful even when a general assignment is used because it acts as a safety net for assets that were not properly transferred into the trust before death. If any asset remains solely in the decedent’s name at death, the pour-over will directs that asset into the trust for administration under trust terms. The combination of a pour-over will and a general assignment helps capture both unretitled items and overlooked assets, providing a more complete plan for transferring the grantor’s estate into the trust structure. Relying solely on a pour-over will can increase the likelihood that assets will pass through probate, so pairing a pour-over will with retitling where possible and a general assignment for miscellaneous items reduces probate exposure and streamlines the transfer process for the trustee and beneficiaries.
Retirement accounts and many insurance policies use beneficiary designations rather than ownership titling to transfer at death. A general assignment typically does not change beneficiary designations, so it is important to review and coordinate those designations with the trust plan. In some cases, retirement accounts may be directed to a trust or to named beneficiaries outside the trust; each option has tax and administrative implications that should be considered when drafting the overall plan. To ensure consistency, clients should review beneficiary forms periodically and consult about whether naming the trust as beneficiary, updating individual beneficiaries, or using a retirement plan trust is most aligned with their goals. Coordination reduces conflict and ensures that retirement assets are distributed as intended under the broader estate plan.
An inventory that accompanies a general assignment should list household items, collections, jewelry, vehicles, and other tangible personal property with a brief description and any known value or intended beneficiary information. The inventory serves as a practical guide for trustees and heirs, helping identify items that require special handling or distribution according to the grantor’s wishes. Photographs, receipts, or appraisals for higher-value items provide useful supporting documentation and reduce questions about ownership or value during administration. Keeping the inventory current is important, particularly after major purchases, gifts, or disposals. A well-maintained inventory paired with the assignment and trust documents makes it easier for the trustee to locate and manage property and reduces the risk of items being overlooked or contested later.
Whether a successor trustee can act without going to court depends on how comprehensively assets were transferred into the trust and whether institutions recognize the trustee’s authority. When assets are properly retitled and the trustee has a certification of trust and other documentation, many financial institutions will allow the trustee to manage trust property without court involvement. A general assignment and clear supporting documents help the trustee demonstrate the grantor’s intent and can reduce the need for probate or court petitions, provided assets are identifiable and institutions accept the documentation. If significant assets remain in the decedent’s name or if disputes arise, court involvement such as probate or a contested Heggstad petition may be necessary. Proper planning and documentation reduce that risk and increase the likelihood that trustees can act promptly under the authority of the trust and assignment documents.
A Heggstad petition may be necessary when a court must determine that assets titled in the decedent’s name were intended to be trust property despite not being formally retitled. Even with a general assignment, disputes or lack of supporting evidence about intent can lead to litigation where a Heggstad petition clarifies ownership so the trust can administer the assets. This petition asks the court to recognize that the decedent intended the trust to own the asset and to permit administration under trust terms to avoid or resolve probate matters. Having a clear assignment, contemporaneous inventory, and documentation demonstrating intent reduces the likelihood that a Heggstad petition will be required. However, when title issues or challenges arise, the petition provides a remedy to establish trust ownership and allow distribution under the trust consistent with the grantor’s wishes.
It is advisable to review a general assignment and the rest of your estate plan periodically and after significant life events such as marriage, divorce, birth or adoption, major acquisitions or disposals of property, or changes in health status. Regular reviews ensure beneficiary designations, account registrations, and assignments remain aligned with your intentions and that the trustee has up-to-date documentation. A periodic review helps identify assets that should be retitled or designations that should be updated to maintain coherence in the plan. Life changes and evolving laws can affect the best way to fund a trust, so scheduled reviews every few years or after major events are prudent. Updating the inventory and ensuring the successor trustee has current information will keep the plan functional and reduce the chance of unexpected complications when the trust must be administered.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas