A Heggstad petition can be an important legal tool for transferring assets into trust without full probate proceedings, and residents of Emerald Lake Hills often seek clear guidance when property was transferred improperly or needs clarification after a trustmaker’s death. Understanding whether a Heggstad petition applies to your property involves a careful review of trust documents, deeds, and the sequence of transfers. Our local approach focuses on explaining the petition process in plain language, identifying the documents required, and outlining likely timelines so you can make informed decisions about protecting trust assets and preserving intended distributions for beneficiaries.
Often the need for a Heggstad petition arises when a deed or transfer appears to have bypassed the trust despite the trustmaker’s intent to fund the trust. When ownership records do not clearly reflect the trust’s interest, a court proceeding can confirm that the property belongs to the trust. This guide describes what homeowners and beneficiaries in Emerald Lake Hills should expect, how to gather supporting documentation, and how effective representation can streamline the process while minimizing delays and confusion during estate administration and trust settlement.
Filing a Heggstad petition can prevent unnecessary probate, correct title records, and ensure the trust’s terms are honored, which benefits both trustees and beneficiaries. Confirming that property is properly held by a trust avoids future disputes and simplifies asset management, particularly when the trust is central to retirement planning, care planning, or estate distribution. For property included in a living trust, establishing clear ownership through a Heggstad petition preserves the trustmaker’s intent and can reduce administrative burdens. The petition offers a formal court recognition that supports smooth transfers and helps the trust continue to function as intended without prolonged litigation.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman serves clients across San Mateo County with a focus on thoughtful estate planning, trust administration, and related court petitions such as Heggstad petitions. The firm combines thorough document review, practical courtroom experience, and a local perspective to help families navigate asset transfers and trust disputes. We work to tailor solutions that reflect each client’s goals, whether that means clarifying property ownership, preparing necessary pleadings, or negotiating orderly resolutions with beneficiaries. Communication is prioritized to ensure clients understand options and likely outcomes at each step of the process.
A Heggstad petition is filed to establish that a property was intended to be part of a trust even though the recorded title or deeds do not reflect the trust’s name. The petition requires evidence that the trustmaker intended the property to be trust property and that a transfer occurred in a manner consistent with that intent. Court review may include examination of signed trust documents, deeds, communications, and any transfers made near the time of trust funding. This process clarifies record titles, resolves ambiguities, and prevents future challenges to the trust’s control over the property.
Successful resolution often depends on assembling clear documentary proof and credible witness statements that show the trustmaker’s intent to place the asset in trust. Timely action is important because delays can complicate recovery of title or permit competing claims. The petition typically asks the court to declare that the property belongs to the trust and may seek related orders to correct public records. Preparing the petition carefully and presenting organized evidence helps reduce the chance of contested proceedings and supports a more efficient court determination consistent with the trust’s terms.
A Heggstad petition is a legal pleading asking a probate court to recognize that certain property belongs to a revocable living trust despite discrepancies in record title. It originated from case law that permits judicial confirmation of trust property ownership when a trustmaker’s actions or intent clearly show placement of the asset into trust. The petition explains the discrepancy, presents supporting documents, and requests a judicial declaration to correct the record. The declared ownership enables trustees to manage and distribute the asset according to the trust without further probate distribution or challenges to the trust’s authority.
A typical Heggstad petition must identify the property, explain the discrepancy between the trust documents and public records, and provide evidence of the trustmaker’s intent to place the asset into the trust. Supporting records can include the trust instrument, deeds, affidavits, escrow or title reports, and communications such as letters or notes made by the trustmaker. The petition process includes filing, notifying interested parties, and possibly attending hearings. Courts evaluate the sufficiency of proof and may order corrective recording or other relief, which helps preserve beneficiaries’ rights and supports orderly trust administration.
Understanding common terms used during a Heggstad petition can reduce confusion. Terms such as revocable living trust, trustee, beneficiary, deed, title, probate, and declaration are frequently encountered. Familiarity with these definitions helps clients gather the correct documents and understand procedural steps. Clarifying which party has legal title versus beneficial ownership is particularly important. The glossary below provides straightforward definitions and practical implications for each term, so homeowners and beneficiaries can better follow proceedings and take the right preparatory steps when a petition becomes necessary.
A revocable living trust is a legal arrangement in which an individual transfers ownership of assets into a trust during their lifetime for management and eventual distribution. The trustmaker can usually modify or revoke the trust while alive, and after death the trust assets are managed by a trustee for the benefit of named beneficiaries. Funding the trust with deeds, account designations, and assignments is essential to avoid probate. A Heggstad petition may be used to confirm that a specific asset was intended to be held by such a trust when public records do not reflect the intended ownership.
A deed is the legal instrument that conveys real property, and the title represents legal ownership as recorded in public land records. When a property is intended to be held by a trust, the deed should reflect that transfer; if it does not, the recorded title can create ambiguity about ownership. A Heggstad petition addresses this gap by asking a court to recognize the trust’s interest based on surrounding evidence. Correcting the deed or recording an order helps align public records with the trustmaker’s documented intent and enables trustees to exercise their duties.
The trustee is the person or entity responsible for managing trust assets according to the trust’s terms and in the beneficiaries’ best interests. Trustees have a duty to collect, manage, and distribute trust property as designated in the trust document. When property title is unclear, trustees may need to pursue a Heggstad petition to establish legal recognition of the trust’s ownership. Proper documentation and adherence to fiduciary duties are important during this process to ensure decisions align with the trustmaker’s expressed wishes and applicable law.
A beneficiary is an individual or entity named in a trust or estate plan to receive assets or benefits. Beneficiaries have a vested interest in clear title to trust assets so distributions can be made smoothly. If a property’s recorded title does not reflect trust ownership, beneficiaries may be affected by delays or disputes. A Heggstad petition helps protect beneficiary interests by clarifying ownership and facilitating the trustee’s ability to administer the trust as intended, which supports timely distribution and reduces the likelihood of contested claims.
When property records conflict with trust documents, there are several legal pathways to consider, including filing a Heggstad petition, pursuing probate administration, or negotiating corrective deeds with title companies and successors. Each option carries different timelines, costs, and evidentiary requirements. A Heggstad petition is often the most direct route to secure a judicial declaration that aligns public records with the trustmaker’s intent. The choice depends on the strength of documentary evidence, the presence of competing claims, and client priorities around speed, cost, and finality in resolving ownership of the asset.
If the trust document, a contemporaneous deed, and title company records consistently show that the trustmaker intended to include the property in the trust, a limited administrative solution may suffice without a full court petition. In these situations, working with the title company to clear an exception or recording a corrective deed can resolve discrepancies. Addressing minor clerical errors or updating ownership designations may avoid court involvement and reduce costs, while still bringing title records into alignment with the trust’s terms for the benefit of trustees and beneficiaries.
When all heirs, beneficiaries, and interested parties agree about the trustmaker’s intent and consent to corrective actions, informal or administrative remedies can achieve a clean transfer more quickly. Agreeing parties can coordinate to execute deeds, affidavits, or title company affidavits that document the intended ownership. Such cooperation reduces the need for a judicial declaration and shortens the timeline for recording corrected documentation. It is important however to ensure that the record created is legally sufficient to prevent future disputes about ownership and distribution.
A Heggstad petition becomes necessary when title records conflict with trust documents and there are competing claims from heirs, creditors, or transferees that cannot be resolved informally. When documentary evidence is ambiguous or transfers occurred under uncertain circumstances, court adjudication provides a definitive ruling. Preparing for such a proceeding requires careful evidentiary compilation, proper notice to interested parties, and readiness for hearings. In these contested scenarios, a comprehensive approach helps protect the trust’s integrity and ensures that the court can issue an enforceable declaration of ownership.
Higher-value real estate or property subject to liens, multiple transfers, or conflicting title claims often demands a formal judicial resolution to avoid ongoing disputes and to secure the trust’s ability to manage or sell the asset. Complex ownership histories may require forensic review of deeds, escrow files, and recorded instruments, and courts may need to evaluate the credibility of competing documentary narratives. A comprehensive petition helps establish clear legal title, enabling trustees to act confidently in the best interests of beneficiaries while reducing long-term risk.
Pursuing a full Heggstad petition provides a durable court order that clarifies title and confirms the trust’s ownership, which is important when informal remedies are inadequate. A judicial declaration offers finality, reduces the chance of later challenges, and allows trustees to proceed with property management, sale, or distribution according to the trust. While a court process can require more time and resources upfront, it also minimizes lingering uncertainty and protects beneficiary interests, particularly when ownership issues could otherwise cloud transferability or complicate tax and estate planning steps.
Comprehensive proceedings also create a public record that aligns the title with the trustmaker’s intent, which benefits future transactions and helps avoid title insurance issues or lender complications. The resulting court order can be recorded to correct the chain of title and support any necessary updates to deeds or title reports. Establishing this legal clarity enhances the trustee’s ability to perform duties confidently, reduces the likelihood of litigation down the road, and helps ensure the trust functions as designed for the benefit of current and future beneficiaries.
A definitive court order from a Heggstad petition offers legal certainty about whether a property belongs to the trust, which decreases the chance of later disputes among heirs or third parties. This finality supports smooth administration and distribution of trust assets, allowing trustees to move forward with confidence. When title discrepancies are settled through the court, beneficiaries benefit from a clear record of ownership that simplifies transactions like sales or refinancing, and reduces friction during tax reporting or subsequent estate planning steps.
By resolving ownership with a court declaration, trustees can record the resulting order to correct public records, improving the property’s marketability and making it acceptable to title insurers and lenders. This is especially important when families need to sell or refinance property that otherwise has an ambiguous title. Clear title reduces transaction friction, speeds closings, and minimizes the risk of future claims that could derail a sale. A Heggstad petition can therefore be an essential step for achieving clean and market-ready title for trust-held real estate.
Start by gathering all relevant trust documents, deeds, escrow records, and any written notes or correspondence by the trustmaker that show intent to place property into the trust. Collecting title reports, mortgage statements, and closing statements can also be helpful. Early document organization speeds the petition process by creating a clear evidentiary record and helps the court understand the transaction history. When you know what is missing, you can proactively seek affidavits or supporting statements from witnesses to build a stronger case without last-minute delays that can prolong resolution.
Coordinate with the title company to understand title exceptions and what corrective recordings are required following a court order. Title insurers can advise about the precise language needed for recorded orders or corrective deeds to ensure marketable title. When a Heggstad petition is successful, the title company can help record the order and update reports so future transactions proceed smoothly. Working with the title company reduces surprises during sales or refinancing and helps ensure the court’s ruling is properly integrated into the public record.
Consider a Heggstad petition whenever property records do not match the trust documents and you need a formal legal declaration of ownership to proceed with administration, sale, or distribution. If an intended trust transfer failed to appear on recorded title, or a deed was executed incorrectly, a petition helps align the public record with the trustmaker’s intent. Acting proactively avoids the risk of later challenges, clarifies duties for trustees, and ensures beneficiaries receive intended distributions without having property remain in limbo or subject to competing claims that complicate settlement.
You should also consider a petition when title issues could impede refinancing, sale, or transfer of property, or when the property is high-value and any ambiguity poses substantial financial risk. Timely filing can protect the trust’s interest and support efficient handling of estate matters that depend on clear ownership. When informal resolution is not possible because of missing documentation, conflicting accounts, or resistance from interested parties, the court declaration provides the legal authority needed to correct public records and allow trustees to act with legal certainty.
Typical circumstances include deeds recorded in the wrong name, property transferred to a trustee informally without updated public records, transfers completed shortly before death, and disputes between family members about ownership. Other triggers are clerical errors in deed preparation or closing documents that fail to reference the trust. Real estate held in joint tenancy that should have been assigned to a trust and discrepancies from loan payoff or title insurance issues can also necessitate a petition. Each situation requires careful review to determine the most efficient path to clear title.
Clerical errors, such as incorrect grantee names or omitted references to the trust during recording, can create significant ownership ambiguity that prevents trustees from managing or disposing of property. These recording errors are often rectified through corrective deeds or, when necessary, a Heggstad petition that establishes the trust’s ownership as intended by the trustmaker. Correcting such errors involves detailed review of original closing documents, correspondence, and any contemporaneous evidence showing the trustmaker’s intent, and may require liaison with county recording offices to implement the court’s order.
When the trustmaker intended to fund the trust but did not complete the transfer steps for all assets before death, property that should be in the trust may remain titled in the decedent’s name. This incomplete funding leads to administrative complications for trustees and beneficiaries. A Heggstad petition can provide court recognition that the property was intended to be trust property despite the incomplete paperwork, enabling trustees to manage or distribute it according to the trust, and helping prevent probate from becoming necessary for assets that the trust intended to include.
Family disagreements over whether property belonged to the trust can escalate into contested title issues that impede administration and distribution. When parties disagree about the trustmaker’s intent or the validity of transfers, a Heggstad petition can provide a neutral legal determination to resolve conflicting claims. Courts evaluate the documentary and testimonial evidence to declare ownership, which helps families move forward without protracted disputes. A clear judicial ruling reduces the emotional and financial costs of lingering uncertainty and supports fair and orderly implementation of the trust’s terms.
If you face title ambiguity affecting property in Emerald Lake Hills, we provide focused legal assistance to evaluate whether a Heggstad petition is the appropriate remedy and to prepare a strong case. We review trust instruments, deeds, escrow files, and related documents, advise on alternatives such as corrective deeds or title company actions, and take steps to protect the trust’s assets and beneficiaries’ interests. Our aim is to resolve ownership issues efficiently so trustees can manage or dispose of property with the legal authority they need while minimizing delay and uncertainty for families.
Clients in San Mateo County work with our firm because of our practical, detail-oriented approach to trust administration and court petitions. We focus on clear communication, thorough document preparation, and follow-through with title companies and county recorders to ensure ordered outcomes. Our goal is to reduce confusion and to secure the legal recognition needed to align public records with trust documents. By prioritizing timely resolution and careful preparation, we help trustees and beneficiaries navigate the procedural and evidentiary requirements involved in confirming trust ownership.
When property issues are complex or there are competing claims, we develop case strategies tailored to the facts, whether that means pursuing a petition, coordinating corrective deeds, or negotiating consensual solutions with interested parties. We assist with gathering affidavits, locating closing documents, and preparing pleadings to present a clear factual narrative to the court. Our practice emphasizes practical solutions that protect assets and preserve family relationships where possible while making sure legal interests are fully represented and supported by the record.
Beyond litigation, we help trustees implement the court’s order by coordinating with title companies and recorders to update public records and facilitate sales or refinancing if needed. That follow-through ensures the court declaration has practical effects on marketability and administration and that beneficiaries receive the benefit of clear title. Clients benefit from consistent guidance through each phase of the process so that once the petition is resolved, trustees can proceed with confidence in carrying out the trust’s terms.
Our process begins with an initial review of the trust and property records to determine whether a Heggstad petition is appropriate. We identify relevant documents, advise on immediate steps to protect assets, and outline potential timelines and costs. If a petition is needed, we prepare the required pleadings, gather supporting evidence, and serve notice to interested parties in compliance with court rules. We represent clients at hearings, negotiate where possible, and coordinate recording of any court orders or corrective instruments to ensure the public record is updated to reflect the trust’s ownership.
We begin by collecting the trust instrument, deeds, closing statements, escrow records, and any communications demonstrating the trustmaker’s intent. This assessment includes reviewing title reports and identifying any liens, mortgages, or exceptions that may affect the property. We evaluate whether administrative corrections are possible or whether a Heggstad petition is necessary, then advise on the evidence that will be most persuasive to the court. Preparing a complete factual record at the outset helps reduce the chance of delays and strengthens the petition should court action be required.
Collecting all relevant documents is critical, including any drafts, signed deeds, trust amendments, escrow closing statements, and communications reflecting intent. We also look for contemporaneous affidavits or witness statements from individuals who can corroborate the trustmaker’s actions or statements. A well-documented file helps reconstruct the property’s ownership history and supports the arguments made in the petition. Organizing this material early reduces the time needed for court presentation and increases the likelihood of obtaining a favorable declaration.
An early title evaluation helps identify any potential defenses or competing claims that could arise, such as liens, prior transfers, or claims from heirs. Understanding these issues allows us to anticipate and address challenges through additional documentation or negotiation. We also determine whether corrective deeds or title insurance options could resolve concerns without court intervention. When litigation is necessary, this evaluation informs the petition’s strategy and helps prioritize actions that will most effectively secure the court’s recognition of the trust’s ownership.
If a Heggstad petition is necessary, we prepare the court pleading that sets out the factual history, identifies the property, and presents supporting evidence demonstrating the trustmaker’s intent. The petition is drafted to meet local court requirements, including the form of notice to interested parties. Accurate, well-supported pleadings reduce the likelihood of procedural objections and prepare the case for the evidentiary stage. Once filed, the matter proceeds through the court’s schedule for service, response, and any hearings necessary to resolve the dispute.
The petition includes a precise description of the property, a narrative of the transfer history, and references to the documentary evidence that supports the trust’s claim. Exhibits such as trust excerpts, deed copies, and closing statements are attached to the pleading to create a clear record. We focus on organizing exhibits and testimony in a way that is easy for the court to follow, highlighting the strongest direct evidence of the trustmaker’s intent. A compelling presentation at filing sets a constructive tone for subsequent proceedings.
After filing, we ensure proper service on all required parties so the court can move forward. We prepare proof of service, monitor deadlines for any responses or objections, and address procedural issues promptly. When interested parties respond, we review their positions and consider negotiation or stipulation where feasible. If disputes remain, we prepare for hearings by refining witness statements and exhibits. Handling notice and responses carefully prevents delays and helps maintain momentum toward obtaining an enforceable court order.
If the court schedules a hearing, we present the evidence and arguments to demonstrate that the property should be recognized as trust property. The court may ask questions, consider competing claims, and evaluate the sufficiency of proof. Following a ruling, we take steps to record any order or judgment that clarifies title and coordinate with the county recorder and title company to ensure public records reflect the court’s decision. This final step converts the legal determination into practical changes that allow trustees to act on the trust’s terms.
At a hearing, we organize witness testimony, documentary exhibits, and legal argument to provide a coherent narrative that demonstrates the trustmaker’s intent and the legitimacy of the trust’s claim. Preparation includes rehearsing testimony, ensuring exhibits are admissible, and addressing potential cross-examination points. A polished presentation helps the court appreciate the factual context and issue an order consistent with the evidence. Clear oral and documentary presentation at the hearing supports an outcome that aligns public records with the trust’s documented wishes.
Once a court issues an order recognizing trust ownership, we assist with recording that order and any corrective instruments so the county records and title reports accurately reflect the trust’s interest. Working with the recorder’s office and title company ensures the recorded documents meet formal requirements and clear title exceptions. This recording completes the process, enabling trustees to manage, refinance, or sell the property without lingering ambiguity. Ensuring accurate public records protects heirs and beneficiaries and promotes a smooth transition for any future transactions.
A Heggstad petition is a probate court filing that asks the court to declare that a particular asset belongs to a trust despite the public record showing a different title or ownership form. This petition is used when the trustmaker intended to fund the trust but recorded documents or other circumstances left the property appearing outside the trust. The petition provides a formal declaration that aligns the legal record with the trustmaker’s intent so trustees can manage or distribute the asset under the trust’s terms. Filing is appropriate when informal or administrative fixes cannot correct the records, when there are competing claims, or when clearer legal authority is needed to enable trustees to act. The court evaluates documentary and testimonial evidence of intent, and if convinced, issues an order that can be recorded to correct title. This process reduces the need for probate of the property and supports orderly trust administration going forward.
Timing for a Heggstad petition varies based on the complexity of the title issues, the completeness of documentation, and the court’s schedule. Some matters with clear evidence and cooperative parties may resolve in a few months, while contested cases or those requiring extensive evidence collection can take longer. The timeline also depends on required notice periods and whether interested parties file oppositions that require hearings or additional briefing. Early preparation and thorough documentation help speed the process by limiting procedural delays and reducing the need for extended discovery. Working proactively to gather deeds, closing statements, and affidavits can shorten the time to resolution. If parties reach agreement, the case can sometimes be resolved more quickly through stipulated orders rather than contested hearings.
Yes. When a deed was never recorded in the trust’s name, a Heggstad petition can be used to present the trustmaker’s intent and the factual circumstances showing the property was meant to be trust property. The petition explains the discrepancy and submits supporting documents such as the trust instrument, closing statements, and any contemporaneous communications or affidavits that demonstrate the transfer intent. The court can then declare that the property belongs to the trust despite the absence of a recorded deed in the trust’s name. This remedy is particularly helpful when deeds were prepared but not recorded, when transfers were executed informally, or when clerical errors prevented proper recording. The petition creates a judicial record to correct public records and enables trustees to manage the property as trust property once the court’s order is recorded with the county.
A successful Heggstad petition typically results in a court order that can be recorded to update public records so title companies and lenders recognize the trust’s interest. This recorded order helps clear exceptions in title reports and can facilitate sales or refinancing that would otherwise be delayed by ambiguous ownership. Title insurers and lenders often depend on recorded documentation, so updating the public record is a key step toward restoring marketability and enabling financial transactions involving the property. While the petition does not eliminate preexisting liens or mortgages, it clarifies ownership for the purpose of administration and transactions. Trustees may still need to coordinate with lenders and title companies to address any outstanding encumbrances, but having a court-declared ownership status significantly improves the prospects for successful sale or refinancing.
The most persuasive evidence includes the trust document itself, a deed or closing statement indicating the transfer, escrow or title reports, and any contemporaneous correspondence or notes by the trustmaker reflecting the intent to fund the trust. Affidavits from witnesses who observed the transfer or discussions about the trust can also be valuable. When multiple documents consistently point to the trustmaker’s intent, the court is more likely to recognize the trust’s claim. Clear, contemporaneous records are stronger than later recollections, so locating original closing paperwork, recorder logs, and title company materials is important. A well-organized set of exhibits and witness statements that corroborate the documentary record presents a convincing factual narrative to the court and increases the chance of a favorable ruling.
Alternatives include pursuing corrective deeds, obtaining affidavits filed with the county, or working with the title company to clear title exceptions when all interested parties consent and documentation is straightforward. When heirs and beneficiaries agree, executing corrective instruments or administrative affidavits may resolve the issue without court involvement. Title insurance endorsements or corrections through title companies can sometimes address defects discovered during a sale or refinancing. However, when parties disagree, evidence is lacking, or the title problem is complex, these administrative solutions may not be sufficient. In such cases a Heggstad petition provides a durable legal determination and is often the most reliable path to ensure the trust’s ownership is recognized in perpetuity and recorded officially.
Yes. Probate rules typically require notice to interested parties, including heirs and beneficiaries, so they have an opportunity to respond to the petition. Proper notice ensures the court can resolve the matter fairly and that any affected parties are aware of claims against the property. Providing notice early and thoroughly reduces the chance of procedural challenges that could delay final resolution and helps preserve the integrity of the court’s eventual ruling. While notice is required, communicating with interested parties outside court proceedings can also help achieve consensual resolutions and sometimes avoid contested hearings. When parties understand the facts and the intended outcome, they may agree to corrective steps that save time and resources for everyone involved.
Not always. Many Heggstad petitions are resolved through written submissions and stipulated agreements when parties are cooperative and the documentary record is strong. The court may grant relief based on the submitted evidence without a prolonged trial. However, if objections are raised or the facts are heavily disputed, the matter can proceed to evidentiary hearings or trial where testimony and cross-examination are required to resolve conflicting accounts of intent and transfer history. Preparation for potential hearings includes organizing evidence, obtaining affidavits, and preparing witnesses to provide clear testimony. Early case assessment aims to limit the need for trial by identifying dispute drivers and exploring settlement or administrative remedies when feasible to conserve time and reduce costs.
A Heggstad petition primarily addresses ownership and title recognition rather than tax liability or creditor claims, but clarifying ownership can affect how estate assets are treated for tax or creditor purposes. If property is declared trust property, it ordinarily passes according to the trust’s terms and may avoid probate administration that could otherwise create additional tax reporting or creditor notice processes. However, property ownership determination is one piece of the broader estate and creditor landscape and should be coordinated with tax and creditor counsel when significant liabilities or tax considerations exist. Creditors’ rights and estate tax consequences depend on the trust structure, timing of transfers, and applicable state and federal rules. While a court’s declaration of ownership can help streamline administration, trustees should still consider potential claims and reporting requirements and work to address any creditor or tax issues consistent with the trust’s terms and legal obligations.
Start by collecting the trust instrument, deed copies, closing statements, escrow records, and any relevant correspondence that demonstrates intent to fund the trust, then reach out for an initial review to determine whether a Heggstad petition is the appropriate step. A preliminary assessment will identify missing pieces of evidence and potential alternatives such as corrective deeds or title company solutions. Early review helps set realistic expectations about timelines and necessary steps to secure an enforceable court declaration or administrative correction. If court action is needed, the process involves drafting the petition, serving notice to interested parties, and preparing exhibits and witness statements. Coordinating with title companies and recording offices is also important for finalizing the order’s practical effects. Getting started early with a focused document collection and local legal guidance will help preserve the asset’s value and move the matter toward resolution.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas