A Heggstad petition helps property intended for a living trust pass to the trust even when the title was not retitled prior to the owner’s death or incapacity. In Menlo Park and elsewhere in California, these proceedings can resolve title problems for assets that the trust creator intended to include but that remain in the decedent’s individual name. The petition proceeds through probate court and asks the judge to confirm that the assets are trust property and should be distributed or managed under the trust’s terms. Early assessment of documentation and consistent trustee or successor trustee action can make the Heggstad petition process smoother and reduce delays in administering estate matters.
If you are handling the estate of a trustmaker and discover assets titled in the individual name rather than the trust, a Heggstad petition often offers a practical remedy. The petition typically requires proof of the trust document, the decedent’s intent to fund the trust, and evidence that the asset was intended to be held by the trust. Courts consider declarations, deeds, beneficiary designations, and other records to determine the settlor’s intent. Because timing, documentation, and procedural detail matter, many trustees and beneficiaries seek careful preparation of petitions to avoid contested proceedings and to ensure assets are transferred in accordance with the trust’s terms and the settlor’s wishes.
A properly prepared Heggstad petition can prevent unnecessary probate, clarify title for trust administration, and permit trust terms to control distribution of assets as intended by the trustmaker. For trustees, it restores the authority to manage or distribute property that was overlooked during trust funding. For beneficiaries, the petition provides a mechanism to access assets sooner under the trust’s direction rather than through an alternate probate proceeding. The legal process also helps settle disputes over intent by presenting evidence to the court, reducing uncertainty and enabling the trust administration to proceed with a clearer record and lawful transfer of property into the trust name.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman, serving San Jose and the broader Bay Area, focuses on estate planning and trust administration matters including Heggstad petitions. Our approach emphasizes careful document review, practical courtroom filings, and clear communication with trustees and beneficiaries. We evaluate the trust document, deeds, beneficiary forms, and any communications that reflect the settlor’s intent, then prepare a petition that presents the strongest available record to the probate court. Our goal is to secure a judicial determination that aligns title with the trust so administration and distribution can proceed consistent with the trustmaker’s objectives, minimizing delay and confusion for family members.
A Heggstad petition is a probate petition used in California when property that should belong to a living trust remains titled in the individual name of the deceased or incapacitated trustmaker. The petition asks the probate court to declare that the property is trust property and to direct transfer or confirmation of title to the trustee. The court evaluates whether the trustmaker clearly intended that the asset be part of the trust, looking at instruments such as the trust document, deeds, beneficiary designations, and other contemporaneous evidence. The petition can be a streamlined path to correct funding oversights without a full contested probate.
The Heggstad process involves filing the petition in the probate court of the county where the decedent lived, providing notice to interested parties, and submitting declarations and supporting documents that show a prior intent to fund the trust. The court may schedule a hearing and allow objections. When the judge finds sufficient evidence of intent, the order may confirm the property belongs to the trust, enabling the trustee to record an order or deed reflecting trust ownership. Attention to proper notice, accurate documentation, and clarity in describing the asset and its relationship to the trust is essential to a successful petition.
A Heggstad petition derives its name from case law that supports treating mis-titled property as trust property when the trustmaker clearly intended the asset to be in the trust. It is used when a transfer into the trust was incomplete prior to death or incapacity — for example, when a deed was never recorded or beneficiary designations were not updated. The petition asks the court to recognize the trustmaker’s intent and to order corrective action so that the trustee can administer the asset under the trust. This remedy avoids re-opening estate plans that were otherwise properly documented and honors the settlor’s documented wishes while following probate procedures.
Key elements of a Heggstad petition include a copy of the trust instrument, evidence of the property description and chain of title, declarations from individuals with knowledge of the trustmaker’s intent, and a clear explanation of why the asset should be considered trust property. Procedurally, the petition must be filed in county probate court, notices must be given to heirs and interested parties, and supporting evidence must be submitted to the judge. A hearing may be necessary if objections arise. Precise property descriptions, accurate records of communications about the trust, and documentary evidence such as draft deeds or transfer instructions strengthen the petition’s chance of success.
Understanding the common terms used in petitions helps trustees and beneficiaries track progress and understand court orders. Terms like settlor, trustee, beneficiary, title, trust funding, probate court, and declaration appear frequently in filings and court communications. Knowing the meaning of these words and how they relate to property ownership and trust administration clarifies why a Heggstad petition is necessary and what proof the court seeks. Familiarity with these concepts also helps involved parties gather appropriate documents and statements to support the petition, making the process more efficient and less stressful for families managing estate matters.
Settlor refers to the person who created the living trust and transferred assets or intended to transfer assets into that trust. The settlor’s documented intent is the primary focus of a Heggstad petition. Evidence of intent can include the trust document itself, correspondence indicating the settlor’s wishes, draft deeds or other transfer documents, and testimony from those who knew the settlor’s plans. Courts look to the settlor’s manifestations of intent, and when the settlor’s wishes are clear, the court can order that mis-titled property be treated as trust property for administration and distribution under the trust’s provisions.
Trustee is the individual or entity appointed to manage trust assets, carry out the terms of the trust, and distribute property to beneficiaries. After a Heggstad order confirms that a particular asset belongs to the trust, the trustee has the legal authority to take steps such as recording an order, transferring title, managing the asset, or distributing it according to the trust’s instructions. The trustee’s duty is to act in the trust’s and beneficiaries’ best interests while following the trust terms and California law governing fiduciary responsibilities and trust administration.
A beneficiary is a person or entity entitled to receive benefits, assets, or distributions under the terms of a trust. Beneficiaries are often notified of Heggstad petitions because the petition affects how and when assets will be distributed. Beneficiaries may support the petition to ensure assets are handled according to the trustmaker’s wishes or may raise objections if there are disputes about intent, asset identity, or distribution outcomes. Clear notice and transparent documentation help reduce conflicts and promote orderly trust administration following court determinations.
A probate court order is a judicial determination that resolves legal questions related to estate or trust administration, including the status of property when its title is in question. In a Heggstad proceeding, the court order may declare that specific property is trust property and direct the recorder’s office or other parties to accept a corrected title or order reflecting trust ownership. This order provides legal authority for the trustee to act, including transferring, selling, or distributing assets in accordance with the trust, and serves as an official record that aligns property title with the settlor’s documented intentions.
When property intended for a trust remains mis-titled, several legal options may be considered depending on the circumstances. A Heggstad petition asks the probate court to treat the property as part of the trust based on demonstrated intent, which can be faster and more directly tied to the trust document than initiating full probate for the estate. Alternative remedies may include corrective deeds, inter vivos transfers, or petitions under different probate statutes if the property was never meant to be in the trust. The right choice depends on timing, asset type, owner capacity, and whether interested parties agree, so assessing facts and record evidence is essential to selecting the most appropriate path.
When there is clear, contemporaneous written evidence showing the trustmaker intended the asset to be included in the trust, a focused court filing or a corrective deed may be sufficient. Documentation such as the trust instrument, signed transfer instructions, draft deeds, or correspondence that directly references the asset and the intent to fund the trust strengthens a limited approach. In these circumstances, the court may accept concise declarations and supporting paperwork that establish intent without a broad contested proceeding, enabling the trustee to obtain the necessary order to reflect trust ownership and continue administration in a timely manner.
When beneficiaries, heirs, and other interested parties agree that the property belongs to the trust and consent to corrective action, the process can be streamlined. Cooperation allows for stipulated orders, uncontested petitions, or agreed-upon corrective deeds that resolve title issues more quickly. Courts consider the absence of opposition and the strength of documentary proof in granting relief. Open communication and agreement among parties reduce the risk of hearings and disputes, enabling the trustee to take steps to record corrected title and proceed with trust administration under the settlor’s documented instructions.
A comprehensive legal approach is advisable when title questions are complex, multiple assets are involved, or interested parties dispute ownership or the settlor’s intent. In such cases, careful investigation, deposition or affidavit gathering, and detailed legal briefing may be necessary to present a persuasive case to the court. Complex matters may involve assets held in multiple forms, conflicting beneficiary designations, or claims by creditors. A thorough approach seeks to anticipate challenges, assemble persuasive documentary and testimonial evidence, and prepare for hearings so the probate court can resolve the issues and confirm the proper ownership and administration path.
Assets of significant value or those that require precise title handling, such as real estate, retirement accounts, or property with complex ownership histories, often merit a more detailed legal strategy. Ensuring the correct property description, resolving liens or encumbrances, and coordinating with recorders and financial institutions can involve multiple procedural steps. A comprehensive approach addresses these technical requirements, secures necessary court orders, and confirms the trustee’s authority to manage, transfer, or distribute the asset in accordance with the trust, thereby protecting beneficiaries and reducing the likelihood of later disputes over title or distribution.
Taking a comprehensive approach to a Heggstad petition can reduce the chance of post-order challenges and help resolve related issues such as liens, outstanding transfer documents, or conflicting beneficiary claims. Detailed preparation results in a stronger presentation to the court, clearer orders that recorders and title companies will accept, and a more predictable administration timeline. For trustees and beneficiaries, this approach aims to protect the estate’s value, avoid protracted litigation, and ensure that distributions follow the trust document as faithfully as possible while meeting legal and procedural requirements.
A thorough strategy also provides guidance on interacting with financial institutions, county recorders, and title insurers after the court issues its order. Comprehensive preparation anticipates questions that these third parties commonly raise and supports the trustee in obtaining clear title or updated ownership records. When the court order is well-supported and carefully drafted, recording the order or obtaining corrective title becomes more straightforward, reducing delays in transferring, selling, or distributing assets as required by the trust’s terms and minimizing administrative burden for trustees and beneficiaries alike.
A comprehensive petition creates a clear and compelling court record that documents the settlor’s intent and the factual basis for treating property as trust property. This record improves the likelihood that the court’s order will be recognized by recorders, title companies, and financial institutions, facilitating the practical steps needed to reflect trust ownership. Clear documentation reduces the chance of future disputes about title or the authority of the trustee, supports efficient asset management, and helps beneficiaries receive their distributions without unnecessary delays or additional litigation.
When the petition and supporting evidence thoroughly address likely objections and ambiguous facts, the court’s order is more resistant to challenges. By assembling declarations, documentary proof, and a clear factual narrative, the filing anticipates contested issues and provides the judge with the information needed to make a firm ruling. That careful preparation limits opportunities for interested parties to reopen disputes later and helps trustees manage assets with greater confidence, protecting the trust’s intended distributions and reducing stress for family members navigating post-death administration.
Collecting all relevant documents as early as possible strengthens a petition. This includes the trust document, any draft or unrecorded deeds, beneficiary forms, correspondence reflecting the settlor’s intent, and bank or brokerage records that show the settlor’s prior actions. Create a clear inventory of the asset at issue, including legal descriptions for real property. Early document assembly makes it easier to prepare declarations that describe the trustmaker’s expressed intentions and streamlines the filing process. Timely collection also reduces the risk of evidence being lost or contested later in the proceeding.
A precise description of the asset and its chain of title helps the court and third parties verify the connection to the trustmaker. For real property, include the legal description, parcel number, and any recorded instruments affecting title. For financial accounts or personal property, include account numbers, statements, or provenance documents. Clear descriptions reduce ambiguity that can lead to objections or delays, and they facilitate recording the court’s order or arranging for title to be updated, streamlining the trustee’s ability to manage or distribute the asset under the trust’s provisions.
Consider a Heggstad petition if a trustmaker’s assets were intended for a living trust but some items remain titled in the individual’s name after death or incapacity. The petition is particularly appropriate when the trust document and other records clearly show intent to fund the trust, and when the trustee needs authority to manage or distribute a specific asset. It can also be the better option when avoiding a full probate proceeding is desirable and when interested parties prefer a process that aligns title with the trust document rather than contesting ownership through alternative estate remedies.
Another reason to file a Heggstad petition is to obtain a court order that recorders and financial institutions will accept to update title or account ownership. Without a court order, title companies and custodians may refuse to recognize the trustee’s authority, which can delay sales, transfers, or distributions. The petition provides judicial confirmation that the asset should be treated as trust property and supplies the legal basis for the trustee to act, helping to protect beneficiaries’ interests and enabling the trust administration to proceed in an orderly fashion under the trust’s terms.
Common circumstances include a missed deed transfer for real property, retirement accounts or bank accounts not retitled or not updated with payable-on-death designations, or personal property that was meant to pass to the trust but remained in the settlor’s name. Other situations involve discrepancies between trust schedules and actual asset titles, clerical errors in recording, or a settlor who attempted but did not complete the funding process. These scenarios create gaps in trust funding that a Heggstad petition can address so the trustee may complete administration consistent with the trust document.
A frequent cause of Heggstad petitions is real estate that was intended to be part of a living trust but was never retitled into the trust’s name. This may occur due to oversight, last-minute changes, or incomplete signing or recording of deeds. When a trustee discovers property still in the decedent’s individual name, a Heggstad petition can ask the court to determine that the property belongs to the trust based on the settlor’s intent, enabling the trustee to obtain an order that corrects title and allows administration or distribution under the trust.
Bank or retirement accounts that still carry outdated beneficiary designations or that were never retitled to a trust may create issues during administration. If the settlor intended those accounts to be trust assets but did not complete the necessary changes, the trustee may pursue a Heggstad petition to align ownership with the trust document. The petition typically includes account statements, communication records, and the trust instrument to show the settlor’s intent, enabling the court to issue an order that supports trust administration and distribution as directed by the trust.
Smaller personal property items or documents such as vehicle titles, stock certificates, or signed but unrecorded instruments can also trigger Heggstad petitions when they remain under the settlor’s name. Evidence like contemporaneous notes, instructions to transfer assets, or draft transfer documents can demonstrate intent to include these items in the trust. Even when assets are not high value, resolving title for all trust-owned items preserves the settlor’s overall estate plan and ensures beneficiaries receive distributions as intended without inconsistent handling of different assets.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman assist trustees, successor trustees, and beneficiaries in Menlo Park and San Mateo County with Heggstad petitions and trust administration matters. We help identify the assets at issue, gather necessary documents, draft the petition and supporting declarations, and handle court filings and notices. Our focus is on clear communication with clients and interested parties, creating a record that demonstrates the settlor’s intent, and securing court orders that allow trustees to proceed with management and distribution under the trust, while minimizing procedural delays and uncertainties.
Clients choose the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman for careful preparation and practical guidance during Heggstad proceedings. We combine focused legal filings with an emphasis on documentation and procedural compliance to help courts recognize trust-owned property. Our process includes a thorough review of the trust document, title records, and communications that reflect the trustmaker’s intent, and we prepare clear, persuasive petitions and declarations tailored to the court’s expectations.
We prioritize transparent client communication and timely filings so trustees and beneficiaries understand next steps and potential timelines. We also assist with notice requirements and coordination with recorders and financial institutions after a court order is obtained, helping to translate legal rulings into practical title corrections and distributions. Our goal is to provide a steady, well-documented path from discovery of mis-titled assets to resolution and trust administration completion.
If disputes or objections arise, we prepare to address them through clear factual narratives and supporting evidence so the court can resolve competing claims. By focusing on organized documentation and methodical presentation, we aim to achieve orders that recorders and third parties will accept, enabling trustees to manage and distribute assets under the trust’s terms with as little interruption as possible for family members and beneficiaries.
Our process begins with a detailed intake to identify the asset, review the trust instrument and any relevant transfer documents, and determine which interested parties must be noticed. We then assemble declarations, compile documentary evidence, prepare the petition, and handle filings and service in accordance with county rules. If a hearing is necessary, we present the factual record and legal arguments to support the request. After the court issues an order, we assist with implementing the order by coordinating with county recorders, title insurers, and financial institutions to reflect the trust’s ownership and to facilitate administration and distribution.
The initial step involves a comprehensive review of the trust document, deeds, account statements, and any communications that indicate the settlor’s intent to include the asset in the trust. We identify interested parties who must be given notice and evaluate whether additional evidence, such as declarations from witnesses, is needed. This stage focuses on assembling a complete factual record, clarifying asset descriptions, and preparing the documentation that will form the backbone of the petition to present to the probate court.
We carefully identify the legal description or identifying details for the asset at issue and collect recorded instruments, account statements, and any draft transfer documents. This helps establish the connection between the asset and the settlor’s intent. Accurate, itemized documentation reduces ambiguity and supports a clear narrative for the petition, facilitating the court’s review and assisting recorders or financial institutions that will rely on the order to update title or account ownership.
To support the petition, we obtain declarations from witnesses, trustees, or others who can attest to the settlor’s intent and actions to fund the trust. Declarations explain the circumstances around the asset and confirm the settlor’s expressed plans. Together with documentary evidence, witness statements create a persuasive factual record that the court can evaluate when deciding whether to treat the asset as trust property and issue an order to correct title or confirm trust ownership.
After assembling evidence, we draft the Heggstad petition to present a coherent account of the asset, the trustmaker’s intent, and the legal basis for treating the property as part of the trust. The filing includes the petition itself, supporting declarations, copies of the trust and any relevant instruments, and proof of service instructions. We ensure compliance with local court rules on format, content, and notice so the petition is procedurally sound and positioned for judicial consideration.
Proper notice to heirs, beneficiaries, and other interested parties is a court requirement and a key part of our filing process. We prepare and serve notice documents, maintain proof of service, and address any service-related challenges. Clear notice minimizes procedural objections and helps create a defensible record that the court can rely on when making its determination about the asset’s status and the trust’s authority to manage or distribute it.
Once the petition and supporting documents are filed, we monitor the court calendar for any hearings, track deadlines for responses or objections, and prepare courtroom materials if a hearing is required. We communicate with clients about expected timelines, potential outcomes, and any additional evidence or testimony the court may request. Active case management helps reduce surprises and keeps the process moving to secure an order that enables trust administration to proceed.
After the court reviews the petition and any objections, it may issue an order declaring the asset to be trust property or directing other corrective actions. We help interpret the order, prepare documents needed to record the order with the county recorder or submit it to financial institutions, and coordinate steps required to reflect trust ownership. Implementation includes addressing title recording, resolving liens or encumbrances, and guiding the trustee through subsequent administration tasks under the trust’s terms.
When the court issues an order, recording the order or preparing a deed consistent with the order is often necessary to complete the title correction. We assist in preparing the recording instruments and in coordinating with the county recorder’s office to ensure the order is properly reflected in public records. Doing so secures the trustee’s authority to manage or transfer the asset and reduces the likelihood of future title disputes or challenges from third parties unfamiliar with the court’s determination.
Following recording, we work with banks, brokerages, and title companies to confirm they accept the court’s order and update account ownership or title records as appropriate. We also guide trustees on any remaining steps for distribution under the trust, such as paying debts, accounting for beneficiaries, and closing the matter once assets are distributed. This final coordination helps convert the court’s ruling into practical outcomes for beneficiaries and completes the trust administration process.
A Heggstad petition is a court filing used in California to request a judicial declaration that specific property belonged to a decedent’s living trust despite the property remaining titled in the decedent’s individual name. The petition is appropriate when the trust document and supporting evidence indicate the settlor intended the asset to be part of the trust but proper retitling did not occur before death or incapacity. The court considers the totality of the evidence to determine whether the asset should be treated as trust property and administered or distributed under the trust. Filing a Heggstad petition typically involves submitting the trust instrument, relevant deeds or account records, and declarations that explain the settlor’s intent and actions. If the court finds satisfactory proof, it can issue an order confirming trust ownership, enabling the trustee to record the order and manage or transfer the asset under the trust’s terms. The petition provides a procedural route to correct oversights in trust funding without pursuing a full probate proceeding.
An asset may require a Heggstad petition when documentation shows the settlor intended the asset to be in the trust but the title remains in the settlor’s name, or when beneficiary designations and recorded instruments conflict with the trust’s provisions. Examples include real estate never retitled, accounts with outdated pay-on-death designations, or personal property that was meant to pass through the trust. If records, communications, or draft transfer instruments demonstrate intent, a petition may be appropriate to align title with the trust. Determining whether a petition is necessary often requires a review of the trust, title records, and any relevant communications or draft documents. If the evidence of intent is strong and interested parties do not object, the court may grant the petition. When evidence is ambiguous or parties dispute the facts, additional documentation, witness declarations, or a more detailed court presentation may be required to support the petition successfully.
Courts look for evidence that the trustmaker intended the asset to be part of the trust. Common supporting materials include the trust document itself, deeds or draft deeds, account statements, beneficiary designation forms, and correspondence or notes indicating the settlor’s plan to fund the trust. Declarations from trustees, witnesses, or family members who can attest to the settlor’s statements or actions can provide essential factual context. Clear, contemporaneous documents are typically most persuasive. The petition should present a coherent narrative tying the asset to the settlor’s intent, supported by documentary evidence and witness declarations. The more complete and organized the record, the more readily a court can determine that the asset should be treated as trust property. Courts may require precise descriptions of the asset and confirmation that procedural notice requirements were satisfied before issuing an order.
The timeframe for a Heggstad petition varies with the county court’s docket, the complexity of the matter, and whether objections are filed. In uncontested situations with clear documentation and no scheduling delays, the process may conclude in a matter of weeks to a few months. When hearings are required or when interested parties object, the matter can take longer as additional evidence is gathered and court dates are scheduled. Other factors affecting the timeline include the time needed to locate and assemble records, prepare declarations from witnesses, and coordinate service on all interested parties. After the court issues an order, additional time may be needed to record the order with the county recorder or to work with financial institutions and title companies to update ownership records based on the court’s ruling.
A Heggstad petition can avoid separate probate for the specific asset at issue by obtaining a court order that treats the property as trust property, allowing administration under the trust’s terms rather than through an estate probate proceeding. However, whether probate is entirely avoided depends on the asset type and the broader estate circumstances. If the asset is only one of several mis-titled items, additional petitions or corrective actions may be needed to address each item or any related claims affecting the estate. Even when a Heggstad petition succeeds, other estate matters such as creditor claims or unrelated assets may still require probate steps. The petition addresses title and trust funding issues for the specified asset, and its success facilitates trust administration for that asset while other estate proceedings may proceed separately if necessary.
Interested parties, typically including heirs, beneficiaries, the named trustee or successor trustee, and certain creditors, must receive notice of a Heggstad petition in accordance with probate rules. Proper service ensures that those with legal interests in the estate have an opportunity to review the petition and respond if they believe the court should not treat the asset as trust property. Providing notice and documenting service is an essential procedural step to preserve the validity of the court’s eventual order. Failure to provide proper notice can lead to procedural challenges or delays, so it is important to identify all parties entitled to notice early in the process. We help clients prepare and serve notice documents and maintain proof of service so the court record accurately reflects compliance with notice requirements and interested parties’ opportunities to be heard.
Yes, beneficiaries or heirs can contest a Heggstad petition if they believe the asset should not be treated as trust property or if they dispute the settlor’s intent. Objections often focus on conflicting documentation, questions about the trustmaker’s capacity or intent, or competing claims to the asset. When objections are raised, the court will consider the evidence from all sides and may require additional declarations, discovery, or a contested hearing to resolve factual disputes. Contested matters typically take longer and may require more extensive factual development. Preparing for potential objections by assembling strong documentary evidence and clear witness statements can reduce the risk of protracted disputes and help the court reach a well-supported decision that clarifies title and the trustee’s authority to administer the asset.
Once the court grants a Heggstad petition, it typically issues an order declaring the asset to be trust property or directing corrective action to align title with the trust. The trustee can then record the order or take other required steps to update ownership records and proceed with trust administration. The order provides the legal basis for the trustee to manage, transfer, or distribute the asset according to the trust’s terms, subject to any conditions in the order or applicable law. After the order is implemented, trustees should coordinate with recorders, title companies, and financial institutions to confirm that the court’s determination is reflected in public or account records. Completing these implementation steps ensures that the trustee can carry out administration responsibilities and helps protect beneficiaries’ interests by securing clear title and legal authority to act.
Alternatives to a Heggstad petition depend on the asset type and the settlor’s prior actions. In some instances, corrective deeds or inter vivos transfers might remedy a mis-titling if all interested parties agree and there is no dispute. Where beneficiary designations are the issue, updating or reconciling account forms and working with custodians may resolve the problem without court involvement. The feasibility of nonjudicial solutions depends on cooperation from title holders, financial institutions, and the willingness of parties to execute corrective documents. When parties disagree or when third parties such as banks or title companies require a judicial order to change ownership, a Heggstad petition may be the most reliable method to obtain clear legal authority. Evaluating alternatives requires a factual review of title records, institutional policies, and the presence of any competing claims, which informs whether a judicial petition or a negotiated correction is the practical path forward.
Preparing to file a Heggstad petition involves gathering the trust document, any deeds or draft instruments relating to the asset, account statements, beneficiary designations, and any communications that reflect the settlor’s intention to fund the trust. Identifying all interested parties and obtaining witness declarations from individuals who can attest to the settlor’s expressed intent strengthens the petition. A clear inventory and organization of documents make the filing more persuasive and efficient for the court to review. It is also important to verify recorded encumbrances, liens, or other title issues that may affect corrective steps after an order is issued. Anticipating questions from the court and third parties, such as the county recorder or financial institutions, and preparing the necessary implementation steps can shorten the time between obtaining a court order and updating title or account ownership to reflect the trust’s control.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas