A Heggstad petition is a specialized legal remedy used to recognize property as part of a deceased person’s revocable trust when the decedent intended the asset to be in trust but title was never properly transferred. For Moss Beach and wider San Mateo County families, this process can mean avoiding unnecessary probate, clarifying ownership for heirs, and preserving the decedent’s estate plan. The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman can assist by explaining the petition, gathering supporting evidence of trust intent, and representing clients through the court process so property transfers occur in line with the trust documents and the decedent’s intentions.
Many families discover after a loved one’s death that a home, bank account, or other asset was meant to be held by a revocable living trust but still lists the decedent as owner. A Heggstad petition seeks a court declaration that the asset belonged to the trust at the time of death despite the missing title change. This process relies on documentation, testimony, and established legal standards to prove intent. For Moss Beach residents, pursuing a Heggstad petition can reduce delay and cost compared with formal probate procedures and help ensure that the trust’s distribution plan is followed.
Filing a Heggstad petition is often the most efficient path to reunite assets with a revocable trust after the owner’s death when transfer formalities were overlooked. The principal benefits include minimizing the time and expense associated with probate, restoring the trust’s intended distribution scheme, and providing clear title for heirs and purchasers. In Moss Beach, where property values and family concerns can be significant, securing a court declaration that an asset was always meant to be part of the trust protects beneficiaries and prevents later disputes. The petition process focuses on evidence of intent, so preserved documents, communications, and regular estate administration practices are important to assemble.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provides personalized estate planning and trust administration representation for residents of Moss Beach and San Mateo County. The firm handles a wide range of trust-related matters, including Heggstad petitions, trust modifications, probate avoidance planning, and trust-related court filings. When a transfer to a trust was intended but not completed, we work to collect the necessary documents, prepare a clear petition, and present persuasive evidence to the court. Our goal is to guide families through a difficult time with practical legal support, clear communication, and focused attention on preserving estate objectives and family harmony.
A Heggstad petition asks the court to recognize that an asset should be treated as trust property because the decedent intended it to be transferred into the revocable trust before death. This is often necessary when deeds, account registrations, or other formal title changes were not completed. The petition relies on evidence such as trust documents, transfer instructions, correspondence, and conduct showing the decedent treated the asset as trust property. Knowing how to assemble and present that evidence effectively is central to success, and the process includes notice to interested parties and a court hearing to resolve any objections.
Not every missing transfer requires a Heggstad petition; sometimes corrective deeds or administrative solutions are possible without court involvement. A Heggstad petition is appropriate when the asset needs a judicial declaration to clear title and reflect the decedent’s trust plan. The remedy can apply to real estate, bank accounts, and other titled assets where the intent to place the property in trust is documented or clearly demonstrated. For Moss Beach residents, the petition can be an efficient alternative to formal probate, helping ensure property passes according to the trust and reducing complications for beneficiaries and lenders.
A Heggstad petition asks the court to declare that certain assets were intended to be included in the decedent’s revocable trust, despite a failure to complete formal title transfers before the decedent’s death. The petition presents evidence that the decedent created the trust with the intent to fund it and acted in ways consistent with that intent. The court then reviews the materials, hears from interested parties, and may issue an order confirming that the asset is trust property. That order allows trustees to manage and distribute the asset according to the trust without resorting to a full probate administration.
A successful Heggstad petition typically requires several elements: the original trust document or certified copy, evidence of the decedent’s intent to fund the trust for the specific asset, documentation showing the asset was treated as part of the trust, and appropriate notice to heirs and other interested parties. The process involves preparing the petition, filing it in the appropriate California court, serving notice, and attending a hearing where the petitioner presents evidence and witnesses. The court then decides whether to issue an order that validates the asset as trust property, enabling the trustee to administer it under the trust’s terms.
Understanding commonly used terms can help demystify the Heggstad petition process. Basic concepts include the revocable living trust, trustee, beneficiary, title transfer, deed, probate, and court declaration. Familiarity with these terms helps participants follow the petition process, assess the available evidence, and understand the court’s role in resolving ownership questions. Clear definitions reduce confusion and make it easier to gather the documents and witness statements that support a petition. Below are short glossary entries for terms you are likely to encounter during the process.
A revocable living trust is a legal arrangement created by an individual to hold assets during their lifetime and provide directions for management and distribution after death. The trust typically names a trustee to manage assets and beneficiaries who will receive distributions according to the trust’s terms. A revocable trust can be changed during the creator’s life and is commonly used to avoid probate, maintain privacy, and provide for seamless asset management if incapacity occurs. Proper funding, meaning the transfer of assets into the trust, is essential for the trust to operate as intended.
A Heggstad petition is a court filing under California law asking the court to recognize that certain assets were intended to be part of a decedent’s revocable trust despite a defect in title transfer. The petition presents evidence of intent, such as the trust document, instructions to transfer assets, or the decedent’s actions showing they treated the asset as part of the trust. If successful, the court issues an order confirming the asset belongs to the trust, which allows trustees to administer the asset according to the trust terms and avoids formal probate for that property.
Probate is the court-supervised process for administering a deceased person’s estate when assets are titled in the decedent’s name and not otherwise transferred through a trust or beneficiary designation. Probate can involve validating a will, appointing a personal representative, paying debts and taxes, and distributing assets under court oversight. Probate can be time-consuming and public. A Heggstad petition is one way to remove an asset from probate by proving it was intended to belong to a trust, allowing distribution under the trust without full probate proceedings.
A Certification of Trust is a short document that provides proof of a trust’s existence and basic terms without revealing the full trust document. It typically includes the trustee’s name, the trust date, and the trustee’s authority to act, and lenders or third parties often accept it instead of a full trust copy. In Heggstad proceedings, a Certification of Trust can help verify the trust structure and the trustee’s authority to manage assets, while minimizing disclosure of the trust’s private provisions during the petition process.
When an asset is not retitled to a revocable trust prior to death, there are multiple possible legal paths, including filing a Heggstad petition, pursuing a full probate administration, using small estate procedures when eligible, or seeking a corrective deed. Each approach has trade-offs. A Heggstad petition is often faster and less formal than probate for a specific asset when strong evidence of trust intent exists. Probate may be necessary for complex estates or when significant creditor claims exist. A corrective deed may be possible when all parties agree. Evaluating which route fits a Moss Beach situation depends on asset type, available proof, and family priorities.
A limited approach can be sufficient when there is persuasive written evidence showing the decedent intended to place a specific asset in the revocable trust, such as transfer instructions, trust funding checklists, or contemporaneous correspondence. When the documentation clearly links the asset to the trust and interested parties do not object, it may be possible to obtain a corrective deed or to complete administrative transfers without extensive court involvement. This path can save time and cost while honoring the decedent’s plan, but it requires careful review to ensure title issues are fully resolved and third parties like lenders are satisfied.
A limited approach may be appropriate where beneficiaries and heirs are cooperative and willing to sign necessary deeds, consents, or affidavits confirming the intended funding of the trust. In those circumstances, a corrective deed or administrative transfer can sometimes be executed efficiently, avoiding the time and expense of a court petition. However, even with agreement, institutions holding the asset may require formal documentation or a court order for certain types of property, and obtaining those assurances can require careful legal handling to prevent future title disputes or challenges.
Comprehensive legal action, such as filing a Heggstad petition, is often necessary when there are conflicting claims to the asset or when evidence of the decedent’s intent is incomplete or contested. In those cases, a judicial determination provides finality, clarifies title, and protects the trustee and beneficiaries from future disputes. A petition collects testimony and exhibits into a formal record so the court can evaluate competing claims. For Moss Beach families facing contested transfers, pursuing a petition can prevent prolonged uncertainty and help ensure the trust’s distribution plan proceeds with legal authority.
Some banks, title companies, and other institutions will not retitle accounts or real estate without a court order, especially when asset paperwork is incomplete or the decedent’s intent is disputed. In those situations, a Heggstad petition provides the formal judicial backing institutions require to release funds, record property transfers, or accept trust authority. Filing the petition ensures that trustees can access and manage the asset under the trust and protects all parties by creating a clear, enforceable court order recognized by third parties and future courts.
A comprehensive approach that includes a well-prepared Heggstad petition can provide legal certainty, reduce the risk of future litigation, and create a clear path for title transfer and trust administration. By presenting a complete record to the court, the petition can eliminate ambiguity about asset ownership and free trustees to carry out the trust’s distribution scheme. For Moss Beach families who value closure and protection of assets, the judicial declaration can prevent debt collectors, surprise heirs, or later challenges from disrupting estate administration.
Another benefit of a thorough petition process is peace of mind for beneficiaries and trustees when property must be sold, refinanced, or otherwise transferred. A court order confirming trust ownership reduces delays with title companies and financial institutions and supports smoother transactions. Additionally, resolving ownership through a petition can preserve the privacy of the trust’s terms by avoiding an extended probate record while still addressing the title defect in a focused legal proceeding, which helps keep family matters more contained.
A principal benefit of obtaining a court declaration is reducing the chance of future disputes over property ownership. A judicial order creates a strong public record clarifying that the asset belonged to the trust, which discourages later challenges and provides clear authority for trustees to distribute or sell the property. For coastal communities like Moss Beach, where real property values and title issues may be high-stakes, resolving those risks promptly helps preserve estate value and provides heirs with a reliable path forward for asset management and distribution.
When an asset is officially recognized as trust property by court order, trustees can proceed with necessary transactions such as selling or refinancing real estate, transferring accounts, or distributing proceeds to beneficiaries. This formal recognition is often required by title companies and lenders, and it streamlines administrative tasks. By addressing title defects through the petition process, trustees avoid repeated obstacles and can focus on executing the trust’s terms efficiently, protecting beneficiaries’ interests and preserving the value and intent of the estate plan.
Collect and preserve all documents that show the decedent’s intent to fund the revocable trust, including the trust instrument, transfer instructions, correspondence, bank statements, and drafts of deeds. Photocopies of checks or notes about intended transfers and emails or letters discussing the trust’s funding can be persuasive. Organize digital and hard copies so they can be presented clearly to the court. Early organization helps reduce delays and allows a focused petition to demonstrate that the asset was always meant to be trust property, increasing the likelihood of a favorable administrative or judicial outcome.
Engage with title companies, banks, and other institutions that hold the asset early in the process to determine their documentation requirements. Some institutions accept a Certification of Trust or corrected deed, while others require a court order before completing a transfer. Understanding each third party’s standards lets you plan an effective legal strategy and avoids surprises at closing or payoff. A proactive approach reduces transaction delays and helps ensure the trustee can manage or transfer the asset according to the trust once the proper documentation or court order is in place.
Consider a Heggstad petition when an asset that should have been placed into a revocable trust remains titled in the decedent’s name and probate would otherwise be necessary. If the decedent created a trust and took steps indicating an intent to fund it but a deed or account title was not updated, the petition can provide a focused judicial remedy. Families should weigh the strength of available evidence, the level of agreement among heirs, and the requirements of third parties holding the asset to determine whether a petition is the right course for resolving ownership and ensuring the trust’s distribution instructions are followed.
You may also consider filing a petition if you anticipate difficulty obtaining cooperation from institutions or if there are competing claims from creditors or heirs that could delay administration. The petition creates a formal record that supports the trustee’s authority and protects beneficiaries by clearing title and allowing timely management of the asset. For Moss Beach residents concerned with real property transactions, lender requirements, or preserving estate plan intentions, a Heggstad petition often offers clarity and legal force to move matters forward with minimal additional disruption.
Common circumstances include when a decedent completed a trust but neglected to record a deed transferring real estate, when bank accounts were intended to be retitled to the trust but were not, or when changes in circumstances left assets improperly titled. Other scenarios include mismatches between the trust language and recorded documents and situations where estate planners waived certain formalities but the records do not reflect the decedent’s intent. In these situations, a Heggstad petition can align recorded title with the trust’s intent, avoiding probate and allowing trustees to administer assets according to the estate plan.
A frequent issue arises when a home or parcel in Moss Beach was intended to be held by the revocable trust but the deed remained in the decedent’s personal name due to oversight or delay. Because title shows the decedent as owner at death, the property could be subject to probate unless a Heggstad petition or corrective deed demonstrates otherwise. Filing a petition assembles evidence that the property was meant to be trust property, allowing the court to declare the asset part of the trust, clear title for the trustee, and avoid lengthy probate proceedings that could burden the family and reduce estate value.
Accounts that were intended to be placed into a trust but remain in the decedent’s personal name can become stuck during estate administration when institutions refuse to transfer assets without a court order. A Heggstad petition can establish that those accounts were part of the trust, enabling the trustee to access funds for administration and distribution. Presenting statements, beneficiary designations, and related correspondence can be persuasive evidence. Resolving account title issues through a petition prevents delays in paying expenses and distributing inheritance to beneficiaries according to the trust terms.
Sometimes the trust document’s language and recorded instruments do not align, such as when a deed references a different title holder or when a trust amendment was not reflected in recorded records. These mismatches create uncertainty about ownership. A Heggstad petition allows the court to examine the trust, related documents, and conduct of the decedent to reconcile differences and issue an order clarifying that the asset belongs to the trust. This outcome simplifies administration and protects beneficiaries from creditor or claimant challenges based on the record title.
If you are dealing with an asset that was intended to be in a revocable trust but was not properly retitled, local counsel familiar with San Mateo County practice can make a difference. The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman offers representation tailored to Heggstad petitions, including evidence gathering, petition drafting, service of notice, and courtroom advocacy when required. Serving Moss Beach residents, the firm focuses on practical solutions that honor the decedent’s estate plan while managing procedural requirements, communication with interested parties, and coordination with banks and title companies to obtain the necessary orders.
Families in Moss Beach and San Mateo County rely on a trusted legal partner who understands trust administration, title issues, and local court procedures. Our firm offers hands-on assistance preparing documentation, identifying persuasive evidence of the decedent’s intent, and presenting a clear petition to the court. We work to minimize delays and to resolve title defects efficiently so trustees can manage and distribute assets under the trust. Our approach emphasizes clear communication with beneficiaries and third parties, timely handling of filings, and careful attention to the legal standards that matter in Heggstad proceedings.
We recognize the sensitive nature of probate alternatives and the emotional and financial concerns families face after losing a loved one. Our team assists with securing court orders when necessary and pursuing administrative solutions when possible, always focused on protecting estate assets and carrying out the decedent’s plan. We coordinate with title companies, lenders, and financial institutions to ensure the order or corrective documentation meets their requirements and avoids further delays in accessing or transferring the asset to the trust.
From initial consultation through court resolution, we aim to keep the process understandable and manageable for clients, providing practical advice on documentation and a clear roadmap for moving forward. Whether pursuing a petition for real estate, accounts, or other titled property, the goal is to secure a binding resolution that allows trustees to perform their duties and beneficiaries to receive what the trust intended, all while keeping the family’s interests and timelines at the forefront.
Our process begins with a thorough intake to identify the asset, review the trust document and supporting evidence, and evaluate alternatives to court action. We explain likely timelines and costs and outline a strategy tailored to your situation. If a petition is appropriate, we prepare the necessary pleadings, obtain required supporting documents, serve notice on interested parties, and represent the trustee at the hearing. Throughout the process we coordinate with title companies and financial institutions to ensure the court order will satisfy their requirements and to facilitate prompt transfer and administration under the trust.
During the initial stage we review the trust, deeds, account records, and any written or recorded communications that show the decedent’s intent to fund the trust. This includes seeking bank statements, emails, signed transfer instructions, and records of related transactions. We also identify interested parties and potential objections and determine whether an administrative fix may be possible. The comprehensive review establishes the foundation for a persuasive petition and helps estimate the likely outcomes and timing for the process.
Collecting and organizing documents is essential evidence for a Heggstad petition. We work with trustees and family members to locate deeds, trust copies, account statements, correspondence, and any drafting notes or memos that indicate intent to fund the trust. Organizing this material into a coherent file allows us to present a convincing narrative to the court and to third parties. Proper documentation also reduces the chance of surprises during the hearing and increases the likelihood that the petition will be resolved efficiently.
Before filing, we often reach out to title companies, banks, and known heirs to determine whether a cooperative solution is possible. Some institutions will accept supplemental documentation or a corrective deed when all parties agree, avoiding court. When agreement is not feasible or institutions require judicial confirmation, early outreach helps ensure the petition addresses their concerns and is likely to produce an order they will accept. This step can streamline the overall process and reduce delays once the petition is filed.
If a Heggstad petition is the appropriate path, we prepare and file the petition in the proper California court, set forth the factual basis and supporting exhibits, and arrange for statutory notice to heirs, beneficiaries, and other interested parties. The petition will identify the asset, the trust instrument, and the evidence demonstrating the decedent’s intent to fund the trust. Serving notice gives interested parties an opportunity to respond and ensures the court can proceed fairly in evaluating any objections and issuing a determination.
Drafting the petition requires assembling the trust, deeds, account records, and witness declarations into a clear and persuasive filing. Exhibits should be labeled, organized, and supported by affidavits or declarations that explain the documents’ relevance. The petition frames the legal issues and sets forth the relief requested, typically a declaration that the asset is trust property. Careful drafting anticipates questions from the court and interested parties and reduces the risk of procedural defects that could delay resolution.
After filing, we ensure notice is provided according to California rules so heirs and other affected parties have a meaningful opportunity to respond. The notice period allows for objections, negotiated resolutions, or settlement discussions. If objections arise, we address them through briefing and evidence or settlement where appropriate. When notice runs and no viable objections remain, the court can proceed to a hearing to evaluate the petition’s evidence and, if persuaded, issue an order confirming the asset’s status as trust property.
The hearing provides an opportunity to present evidence and testimony supporting the petition. We prepare declarations, arrange witness appearances if necessary, and present legal arguments that show the asset should be treated as trust property. If the court finds the evidence persuasive, it issues an order declaring the asset part of the trust and directing appropriate record changes. That order enables trustees to manage, transfer, or distribute the asset under the trust’s terms and provides the documentation third parties often require to complete transactions.
At the hearing, the court reviews documentary and testimonial evidence demonstrating the decedent’s intent to fund the trust. We present a clear narrative supported by exhibits and witness statements, explaining why the court should declare the asset trust property. Effective presentation addresses foreseeable objections, clarifies any discrepancies in recorded instruments, and ties the asset to the trust’s provisions. A well-organized hearing reduces the chance of continued litigation and supports obtaining a definitive order that third parties will recognize.
Once the court issues an order recognizing the asset as trust property, the trustee can present the order to title companies, banks, and other institutions to effect transfers, sales, or distributions. We provide guidance on recording deeds, updating account registrations, and taking administrative steps to implement the order. The court’s decree serves as authoritative proof of the trust’s ownership interest and protects trustees and beneficiaries against future challenges when relied upon properly during transactions.
A Heggstad petition is a court action that asks the court to recognize certain property as belonging to a revocable trust despite a failure to complete a formal transfer before death. It is used when a decedent created a trust with the intent to place specific assets into it but title to those assets remains in the decedent’s name. The petition presents evidence such as the trust document, deeds, account records, and correspondence to show intent and to ask the court to issue an order validating trust ownership of the asset. This remedy is particularly useful when third parties or conflicting claimants prevent an administrative transfer, or when the asset’s recorded title would otherwise require probate. The petition process includes filing pleadings, serving notice to interested parties, and a court hearing where evidence is presented. If the court is persuaded, it issues an order that allows trustees to administer or transfer the asset under the trust terms.
The timeline for resolving a Heggstad petition varies depending on the court’s calendar, the complexity of the facts, and whether interested parties object. In straightforward matters with clear documentation and no opposition, the process can be completed more quickly. Preparing a thorough petition and coordinating with title companies and institutions in advance helps shorten delays and increases the likelihood of an efficient resolution. If objections arise or additional evidence is needed, the matter can take longer as the court schedules hearings and considers supplemental filings. Working with counsel who understands local practice and who can anticipate institutional requirements helps keep the process focused and can reduce the overall time required to obtain the court order recognizing the asset as trust property.
Evidence that supports a Heggstad petition typically includes the trust document or a certified copy, deeds or account records linking the asset to the decedent, written transfer instructions, correspondence showing intent to fund the trust, and witness declarations describing the decedent’s actions or statements. The more direct and contemporaneous the documentation, the stronger the petition will be. Photocopies of checks, draft deeds, or notes about funding the trust are often persuasive when combined with declaratory statements from people who observed the decedent’s intent. Courts evaluate the totality of the evidence, so assembling a cohesive narrative with supporting exhibits is critical. It is also important to provide clear, organized documentation for title companies and financial institutions to reduce post-order complications and facilitate the trustee’s ability to manage and transfer the asset under the trust.
A Heggstad petition can remove a particular asset from the probate process by securing a court declaration that the asset belonged to the trust at the time of death. That allows the trustee to handle the asset under the trust’s terms rather than through probate administration. While the petition addresses specific assets with title issues, other portions of an estate that are properly titled in the decedent’s name may still require probate. The petition is therefore a focused tool for correcting funding defects without initiating a full estate probate when appropriate. Using a petition to resolve title defects can substantially reduce the time, cost, and public exposure that often accompany probate, but its appropriateness depends on the evidence for each asset and any creditor or claimant issues that might require broader estate administration. Consulting about the entire estate picture is helpful to determine whether additional probate steps are necessary.
Many banks, title companies, and other institutions accept a court order resulting from a Heggstad petition as sufficient proof to retitle accounts or record deeds in the name of the trustee. Acceptance depends on the institution’s internal policies and the clarity of the court’s order. Preparing the petition with an eye toward what third parties require and obtaining specific language in the court order that addresses recording or transfer needs improves the likelihood that institutions will act promptly. When institutions maintain stricter standards, we coordinate with them in advance to understand their documentation requirements and, if needed, seek tailored orders that satisfy their conditions. This proactive collaboration helps ensure the trustee can implement the court order without further delay or complication.
When filing a Heggstad petition, you must provide notice to heirs, beneficiaries, and other interested parties as required by California law so they have an opportunity to respond or object. Proper notice ensures the court proceeds fairly and gives affected persons a chance to participate. The list of parties requiring notice depends on the estate’s circumstances, the trust terms, and known heirs, and it may include personal representatives, creditors, and named beneficiaries of the trust or will. Serving notice correctly is a procedural requirement that helps prevent later challenges to the petition’s validity. Careful identification and service of all interested parties reduces the risk of procedural defects and supports a more conclusive court order that third parties will accept in subsequent transactions.
Alternatives to filing a Heggstad petition include corrective deeds, affidavits of death and transfer where permitted, small estate procedures when the estate falls within statutory limits, or administrative transfers accepted by banks and title companies. When all interested parties agree, a corrective deed or joint affidavit may suffice to transfer real property to the trust. Likewise, some institutions accept a Certification of Trust or other supporting documents to retitle accounts without a court order. However, when institutions refuse to act, or when disputes or unclear evidence exist, a Heggstad petition provides the judicial authority needed to resolve ownership definitively. Evaluating alternatives early helps determine whether a petition is necessary or whether a less formal administrative path is feasible.
Filing a Heggstad petition involves legal fees and court costs, and those expenses vary with the complexity of the facts and whether objections are raised. A petition can still be more cost-effective than full probate when the issue concerns a single asset or limited set of assets, particularly if it avoids the expense and delay of estate administration through probate. The overall cost depends on evidence gathering, drafting, service, and any required hearings, so an early assessment of likely resistance and documentation needs helps estimate fees. Working toward a focused, well-supported petition and exploring administrative alternatives when appropriate can keep costs reasonable. Transparent communication about expected costs and potential outcomes helps clients make informed decisions about pursuing a petition versus other options.
Yes. Once a Heggstad petition is granted and the court issues an order recognizing the property as trust property, the trustee may have authority to sell or refinance the property as provided by the trust and applicable law. The court order serves as proof of the trustee’s title and authority for third parties involved in a sale or financing transaction. It is important to ensure the order contains any specific language needed by title companies or lenders to proceed without delay. After obtaining the order, the trustee should follow standard procedures for sales or refinances, including obtaining title insurance if required and coordinating with escrow and lending institutions. The court order simplifies these transactions by creating a clear legal basis for the trustee’s actions under the trust.
To begin, gather the trust document, any deeds, account statements, transfer instructions, and communications that show the decedent intended the asset to be in the trust. Contact counsel experienced in trust administration and Heggstad petitions to review the materials and advise on the best course, whether that is a petition or an administrative solution. Early steps include identifying interested parties who must be notified and checking institution requirements for transfers or recording. An initial consultation will help determine whether there is sufficient evidence to proceed and outline a plan for collecting remaining documents, preparing necessary affidavits, and, if needed, filing a petition with the court. Acting promptly and with organized documentation improves the chances of an efficient resolution.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas