A Heggstad petition can be an essential tool when a decedent’s assets need to be transferred into trust administration without formal probate. At the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman, we help clients in North Fair Oaks and the surrounding San Mateo County area understand how a Heggstad petition works, what the likely outcomes are, and what to expect during the court process. This introduction explains the purpose of the petition, when it may be appropriate, and how it can streamline certain trust-related transfers to avoid lengthy probate proceedings.
When a trust has been funded informally or assets remain titled in a deceased person’s name, a Heggstad petition provides a judicial mechanism to confirm that those assets actually belong to the trust. The petition asks the court to recognize transfers into trust and to allow the trustee to manage or distribute the property according to the trust terms. This paragraph outlines typical scenarios where petitioning the court reduces disputes, clarifies title for third parties, and enables trustees to carry out their duty to beneficiaries promptly and with minimized delay.
A Heggstad petition can resolve uncertainty over asset ownership after a trustmaker’s death and avoid the complexity of full probate. Filing the petition provides court confirmation that specific assets should be treated as trust property, which helps financial institutions, title companies, and other third parties accept trust authority. The process reduces the risk of competing claims, clarifies the trustee’s authority to manage or convey assets, and protects beneficiaries’ interests. For families attempting to administer a trust efficiently, the petition offers a legal path to clear title and facilitate distributions without unnecessary delay.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provides clients in San Jose, North Fair Oaks, and throughout California with practical legal support for estate planning and trust administration. Our approach emphasizes clear communication, careful review of trust documents, and efficient court filings when a Heggstad petition is the right course of action. We guide trustees and family members through required notices, documentation, and court steps while striving to minimize tension among beneficiaries. Our goal is to resolve title questions and keep the focus on honoring the trustmaker’s intentions in a timely manner.
A Heggstad petition is filed in the probate court to establish that property initially titled in a deceased person’s name was intended to be part of a revocable living trust. The petition typically includes facts about how the assets were intended to be transferred into the trust, copies of relevant trust and estate documents, and proof of the trustee’s authority. Courts evaluate the evidence and may issue orders confirming trust ownership, allowing trustees to re-title assets and proceed with administration. This explanation helps trustees and family members recognize the documentation and steps commonly required for a successful petition.
The Heggstad petition process involves preparing a factual declaration showing the trustmaker’s intent and the circumstances of the asset transfer, filing the petition with the appropriate county court, and providing required notices to heirs and interested parties. The court may set a hearing or proceed on the papers depending on objections and the complexity of the matter. If no valid opposition is raised, the court will often issue an order confirming trust title, which facilitates selling, transferring, or otherwise managing the asset on behalf of beneficiaries. This overview clarifies expected timelines and potential outcomes.
A Heggstad petition is a legal request to the probate court that certain property of a deceased person should be treated as trust property because of a prior transfer or intent to transfer into a trust. Named after a leading California case that addressed these circumstances, the petition allows trustees to clear title and obtain court recognition without full probate administration. It is commonly used when assets were never formally re-titled after the trust was created or when the trustmaker’s wishes are clear but third parties require judicial confirmation before transactions occur. This clarification helps trustees move forward with administration.
Key elements of a Heggstad petition include a clear factual declaration by the trustee or interested party, copies of the trust and any relevant transfer instruments, proof of the trustmaker’s death, and identification of heirs and potential claimants who must be notified. The trustee must explain why the property should be treated as trust assets and provide supporting documentation for the intended transfer. The court’s role is to evaluate evidence of intent and to determine whether the asset belongs to the trust, allowing re-titling or distribution. Understanding these steps helps trustees prepare an effective petition and anticipate possible objections.
This glossary explains common terms encountered during Heggstad petition matters, including trustee, trustmaker, probate court, title transfer, and beneficial interest. Understanding these terms helps trustees and family members follow legal filings, respond to court notices, and provide the necessary documentation. Clear definitions can reduce confusion when communicating with banks, title companies, and other institutions involved in re-titling assets. Familiarity with these terms also helps in evaluating whether a Heggstad petition or a different legal procedure is the best path forward for resolving ownership questions and completing trust administration.
A trustee is the person or entity appointed under a trust agreement to manage trust assets, carry out the trustmaker’s instructions, and distribute property to beneficiaries according to the trust terms. The trustee has fiduciary duties to the beneficiaries, including duties of loyalty and prudent administration. In a Heggstad petition context, the trustee often files the petition to establish court recognition that specific assets are trust property so the trustee can manage or convey those assets properly. Clear documentation and transparent actions by the trustee help reduce disputes and support court approval.
A Heggstad petition is a court filing used to establish that specific assets of a deceased person should be treated as part of a trust, even if they were never formally re-titled. The petition submits evidence of the trustmaker’s intent and the circumstances surrounding the asset’s placement or intended placement in the trust. If the court finds the required facts, it can issue an order confirming trust ownership and authorizing the trustee to manage, transfer, or distribute the property. The petition streamlines administration where formal probate might otherwise be necessary for title issues.
Probate court is the judicial body that handles matters related to estates, guardianships, conservatorships, and certain trust disputes. In Heggstad petition cases, the probate court reviews evidence about whether assets should be treated as trust property and issues orders resolving title questions. Courts determine whether the trustmaker’s intent and documentation support trust ownership, and they may require notice to heirs and interested parties before ruling. Understanding which county’s probate court has jurisdiction is an important early step when pursuing a petition to confirm trust title.
Re-titling refers to the process of changing the legal ownership of an asset from an individual’s name into the trust’s name so the trustee can manage or distribute it under the trust’s terms. When re-titling does not occur before the trustmaker’s death, a Heggstad petition may be necessary to obtain court confirmation that the asset belongs to the trust. Successful re-titling simplifies asset management and reduces obstacles when selling property or transferring accounts, and courts often issue orders directing title companies and financial institutions to recognize trust ownership after a petition is granted.
When assets remain in a deceased person’s name despite a trust, interested parties can pursue different legal paths, including full probate, a Heggstad petition, or negotiation with third parties to accept trust documentation. Probate is more formal and can involve broader administration and fees, while a Heggstad petition focuses narrowly on confirming trust ownership of specific assets. The right option depends on the scope of the estate, the number of assets involved, potential creditor claims, and the willingness of institutions to accept trust documents. This comparison helps families select the least disruptive route to clear title and proceed with administration.
A Heggstad petition is often sufficient when only a few assets remain titled in the deceased individual’s name and the trust is otherwise intact. In these situations, focusing on the specific asset or assets that need recognition by the court can avoid the time and expense associated with a full probate administration. Trustees can present focused evidence of intent and documentation regarding those assets, which typically leads to a streamlined hearing or order. This approach is appropriate when there are no contested creditor claims and when beneficiaries agree on the trust’s validity and intended distributions.
A limited petition works well when the trust documents, declarations, and any supporting instruments clearly indicate that the assets were meant to be part of the trust, and when heirs or beneficiaries are cooperative. When interested parties do not object and the factual record is strong, courts can quickly confirm trust ownership. This cooperative context minimizes litigation risk, shortens the timeline, and reduces administrative effort. Trustees should still ensure proper notice and follow required procedures to protect the process against later challenges that could reopen title issues.
A comprehensive legal approach is advisable when multiple assets are involved, titles are complex, or there are disputes among heirs. These circumstances can increase the risk of contested hearings and may require broader estate administration or coordinated filings, including conservatorship matters, creditor notices, or parallel litigation. A broader approach ensures that fiduciary duties are met, deadlines are observed, and potential claims are addressed in a structured way. It also helps to prevent piecemeal litigation that could delay distributions and increase costs over time.
When there is a risk of creditor claims or complex tax implications related to assets, a more complete legal strategy is often necessary. Addressing creditor notice requirements, potential estate tax filings, and the implications of re-titling particular accounts can require careful coordination. A comprehensive approach addresses not only title confirmation but also the wider legal and financial context to limit liability and preserve estate value. Trustees and beneficiaries should consider a full assessment to identify any exposure before pursuing limited remedies that might overlook important obligations.
Taking a comprehensive approach to trust administration and petitioning can provide greater protection against later challenges and ensure all legal requirements are satisfied. Coordinated planning includes proper notice to heirs, attention to creditor timelines, tax considerations, and clear documentation to support court filings. This thoroughness reduces the likelihood of disputes that reopen settled matters and helps trustees make distributions with confidence. Beneficiaries benefit from an orderly process that addresses both title issues and related obligations, leading to more predictable outcomes and preservation of estate assets.
Comprehensive representation also allows for proactive resolution of issues that might otherwise complicate trust administration, such as ambiguous trust provisions or conflicting beneficiary claims. By addressing these matters early and using appropriate filings when necessary, trustees can minimize delays and protect the interests of all parties. A full-service approach to petitions and administration helps ensure that orders issued by the court are broad enough to support necessary transfers, provide clarity to third parties, and allow trustees to complete their duties responsibly and efficiently.
One important benefit of a comprehensive approach is the court’s ability to issue clear orders that third parties will accept for re-titling, sale, or transfer of property. When the probate court affirms that certain assets are trust property, title companies and financial institutions are more likely to proceed without requiring separate litigation. This clarity reduces the time required to complete sales or account transfers and gives trustees the documented authority needed to act. The result is smoother administration and fewer post-settlement disputes over ownership.
A thorough legal approach minimizes the risk that unresolved title issues or inadequate notice will lead to later challenges from heirs or creditors. By ensuring the record is complete, notices are properly served, and the court’s orders address relevant claims, trustees can significantly reduce the chances of re-litigation. This protection helps beneficiaries receive intended distributions more quickly and with less uncertainty. Taking steps to fully document the process and secure judicial approval where appropriate provides long-term peace of mind for everyone involved.
Before filing a Heggstad petition, gather the trust document, any transfer instruments, account statements, deeds, and correspondence showing the trustmaker’s intent. A well-organized file supports the factual declaration required by the court and reduces the need for follow-up subpoenas or additional hearings. Proper documentation also helps ensure that interested parties receive accurate notice and that the evidence presented leaves little room for confusion. Early preparation improves the chance of a smooth process and saves time for trustees and beneficiaries.
Recognize that banks, title companies, and other institutions may require a court order, certified copies of documents, or additional proof before accepting trust authority. Anticipate those requirements by requesting certified orders, obtaining necessary certifications, and being prepared to provide copies of trust documents. Understanding the practical needs of third parties expedites transfers and avoids repetitive requests. Trustees should confirm institution-specific procedures in advance so that the petition, once granted, can be used effectively to re-title or transfer assets without further delay.
Filing a Heggstad petition is often considered when a trustmaker’s assets were not formally re-titled during their lifetime, leaving property in their individual name at death. The petition offers a practical way to obtain judicial recognition that those assets belong to the trust, enabling the trustee to manage or distribute them according to the trust terms. Families considering this option typically seek a faster resolution than full probate, clearer documentation for third parties, and a formal court order to protect against future ownership disputes or claims by heirs.
Another reason to pursue a petition is to facilitate transactions that require clear title, such as selling real estate or transferring financial accounts. Without court confirmation, institutions may refuse to recognize trust authority or accept transfers, which can cause delays and added expense. The petition helps create a documented record that supports trustee actions and reassures beneficiaries and third parties that the transfer aligns with the trustmaker’s intentions. This pathway is especially useful when the facts supporting trust ownership are straightforward and documentation can be presented effectively.
Common circumstances include situations where real property remains deeded in the deceased’s name, bank accounts were not retitled to the trust, or retirement accounts require clarification regarding beneficiary designations and trust ownership. Discrepancies between the trust document and asset titles often prompt trustees to seek court confirmation. Other reasons involve institutions refusing to accept the trust document without a court order or when heirs demand judicial determination to clear title. Identifying these circumstances early helps trustees choose the appropriate legal path and prepare necessary evidence.
When real property remains in the decedent’s name because deeds were not transferred into the trust, a Heggstad petition can obtain a court order recognizing the property as trust property. This helps trustees sell or transfer the property under trust directions and provides the title company with the documentation it needs. The petition outlines the trustmaker’s intent, presents the trust and deed history, and requests an order that clears title for future transactions. Addressing real property through the petition reduces uncertainty and helps facilitate sales or distributions.
Financial accounts and retirement plans sometimes remain payable to or held in the decedent’s name, creating friction when a trustee seeks to access or transfer funds. A Heggstad petition can clarify whether such accounts were intended to be controlled by the trust or whether beneficiary designations govern distribution. Courts can issue orders that resolve title questions and instruct financial institutions on how to proceed, which streamlines administration and prevents prolonged disputes. Trustees should gather account statements and designation documents to support the filing.
Banks and title companies occasionally decline to accept trust documentation without judicial confirmation, especially when the trust was amended or when trust copies are incomplete. In these cases, filing a Heggstad petition and obtaining a court order often convinces institutions to accept transfers or allow account management under the trustee’s authority. The petition creates a formal record that institutions respect, reducing the friction that can occur when relying solely on private documents. This path protects trustees and beneficiaries by creating an authoritative basis for action.
We assist trustees and families in North Fair Oaks and nearby communities with Heggstad petitions, trust funding issues, and related estate administration tasks. Our firm helps gather required documentation, prepare factual declarations, file petitions with the San Mateo County probate court when appropriate, and manage notices to interested parties. We aim to reduce delays in re-titling assets and support trustees in carrying out their duties with clear legal backing. If institutions refuse to accept trust documents, a petition can often provide the judicial confirmation needed to move forward.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman offers practical legal counsel for estate planning and trust administration matters, including Heggstad petitions. We focus on preparing complete filings, organizing supporting documentation, and pursuing efficient court resolutions tailored to the needs of trustees and beneficiaries. Our office serves clients throughout San Mateo County and the Bay Area, bringing a local understanding of probate court practices and third-party administrative requirements. We help clients anticipate procedural steps and minimize the potential for disputes during the petition process.
Clients benefit from clear guidance about notice requirements, evidence collection, and post-order steps such as securing certified copies for title companies and financial institutions. We work to keep families informed and engaged throughout the process, responding to questions and updating interested parties on progress. By addressing both legal and practical elements of trust administration, we help trustees complete necessary transfers and distributions effectively. Our approach is to prepare each petition so that it supports orderly outcomes and reduces the chance of future litigation.
We also advise trustees on parallel considerations such as creditor timelines, tax-related filings, and potential need for broader administration in complex matters. When a Heggstad petition is appropriate, our office helps craft a confident factual record for the court and coordinate any additional filings that may protect estate value. Our goal is to provide trustees and beneficiaries with realistic expectations, practical solutions, and a clear path to resolving title issues in a manner consistent with the trustmaker’s intentions and applicable law.
Our legal process begins with a careful review of the trust document and relevant asset records to determine whether a Heggstad petition is the appropriate remedy. We identify interested parties for notice, assemble the factual declarations and supporting exhibits, and file the petition in the appropriate probate court. We monitor the case docket, address any objections that arise, and obtain court orders that facilitate re-titling or distribution. After the order is issued, we assist with obtaining certified copies and liaising with banks and title companies to complete transfers.
The first step is to evaluate the trust, the assets in question, and the available evidence showing the trustmaker’s intent to include those assets in the trust. This includes collecting deeds, account statements, transfer documents, and any records of communications or instructions. We also identify heirs and potential claimants who must be notified and confirm the appropriate county jurisdiction for filing. This thorough initial review forms the basis for a factual declaration that clearly presents the circumstances to the court.
Reviewing trust documents and asset histories ensures that the petition will address the facts the court needs to consider. We analyze trust provisions, any amendments, and the sequence of events regarding asset ownership. When deeds or accounts were intended to be placed in trust but remain in personal names, we document the timeline and supporting evidence that demonstrates the trustmaker’s intent. This careful review strengthens the petition and prepares the trustee to address common questions from the court or interested parties.
Identifying and notifying all required parties is a critical early step. We determine who must receive notice under California law, including heirs, beneficiaries, and certain creditors, and prepare service documents accordingly. Proper notice reduces the risk of later procedural challenges. We also prepare proof of service for the court record. Transparent handling of notices helps demonstrate that the petition is appropriately presented and that interested parties had the opportunity to object before the court ruled.
After gathering documentation and confirming notice requirements, we draft the petition, supporting declaration, and exhibits for court filing. The petition presents the factual basis for treating the specific asset as trust property and requests an appropriate order from the probate court. We ensure filings comply with local court rules and submit all necessary paperwork. If potential opponents are identified, we include preemptive legal arguments and supporting evidence to reduce the likelihood of contested hearings and to promote efficient resolution.
The factual declaration is central to a Heggstad petition because it explains why the asset should be treated as part of the trust. We prepare a declaration that recounts the trustmaker’s actions, any transfer steps taken, account histories, and communications that support the intent to fund the trust. The declaration format, language, and supporting exhibits are tailored to the probate court’s expectations to maximize clarity and reduce the need for supplemental filings. A clear factual record increases the chance of timely judicial recognition.
We compile and submit all required documents, including the petition, declaration, trust excerpts, deeds, account statements, and proof of death. We also prepare the required notices and forms for service. Ensuring exhibits are properly authenticated and organized helps the court review the matter efficiently. Once filed, we monitor court responses and address any procedural issues promptly. Effective filing and follow-up reduce delays and help trustees achieve the relief they need to manage or dispose of trust property.
After the court issues an order recognizing trust ownership, there are important post-order actions to complete, such as obtaining certified copies of the order and providing them to banks or title companies. Trustees should use the court order to re-title property, transfer accounts, or sell assets as authorized by the trust. We assist with these final steps to ensure the assets are properly administered and that distributions proceed in accordance with the trust instructions. Completing the post-order tasks closes the loop on the petition process.
Once the petition is granted, obtaining certified copies of the court order and preparing cover letters for banks, title companies, and other institutions helps facilitate transfers. Institutions often require certified documentation and may have their own internal procedures for accepting orders. We work with trustees to present the court’s order in the format institutions require, coordinate with title companies for real property transfers, and follow up until the assets are re-titled or distributed as directed by the trust.
With court confirmation in hand, trustees can proceed with transfers, sales, or distributions authorized by the trust. We help ensure these transactions comply with trust provisions and any court conditions, and we advise on documentation needed to finalize transfers. Proper completion of these steps preserves estate value and ensures beneficiaries receive what was intended. Trustees also receive guidance on recordkeeping and reporting that supports future accounting or beneficiary inquiries.
A Heggstad petition asks the probate court to recognize that certain assets of a deceased person belong to a trust based on the trustmaker’s intent or prior transfer efforts. It is commonly used when the trust exists but specific assets were never formally re-titled into the trust, leaving banks or title companies reluctant to accept trust authority. The petition presents declarations and supporting exhibits to show the circumstances of the intended transfer and requests an order confirming trust ownership so the trustee can manage or distribute the property. You might need a Heggstad petition when third parties will not honor trust documents alone and require a court order to accept transfers or changes in title. It is also useful when heirs desire judicial clarity to avoid future disputes. Filing the petition can speed access to funds or permit the sale of property while reducing the need for a full probate administration when the issue is limited to title recognition.
The timeline for a Heggstad petition varies depending on the county court’s docket, whether objections are filed, and how quickly required notices are served. In cases with no objections and complete documentation, courts may resolve petitions within a few weeks to a few months. When hearings are required or when interested parties contest the petition, the process can extend several months. Anticipating potential delays and preparing a thorough filing helps keep the case moving efficiently. Factors that influence timing include the completeness of the evidence, the responsiveness of heirs and institutions to notice, and the court’s workload. Ensuring that all required parties are properly identified and served, and that exhibits are organized and authenticated, reduces the likelihood of continuances and supplemental filings that add to the timeline. Early coordination with third parties can also speed post-order re-titling once the court issues an order.
Supporting a petition typically requires the trust document or relevant excerpts, any deeds or transfer instruments, account statements, correspondence demonstrating intent, and a certified death certificate. A trustee’s factual declaration should explain the sequence of events and why the asset should be treated as trust property. Exhibits should be organized and labeled for the court, and authentication may be needed for certain documents. The more complete and coherent the documentary record, the stronger the petition. Additional helpful documents include prior amendments to the trust, beneficiary designation forms, and any communications with financial institutions or title companies about the intended transfer. Proof of proper notice to heirs and interested parties is also required. Gathering these materials in advance streamlines filing and improves the likelihood that the court will grant the requested order without extended inquiries.
Yes. California law requires that certain interested parties, such as heirs and named beneficiaries, receive notice of a Heggstad petition. Proper notice allows those with potential claims to respond or object and is part of the court’s process for ensuring fairness. The petitioner must prepare and serve notice documents and file proof of service with the court. Proper service and documentation reduce the risk of procedural challenges later on. Notifying interested parties often leads to more efficient resolution when beneficiaries are informed and agree with the petition. If objections are raised, the court will address them, which can extend the process. Clear communication and careful proof of service help demonstrate that all interested parties were given the opportunity to participate and protect the integrity of the court’s eventual order.
Yes, a Heggstad petition can resolve title issues for real estate when deeds were not transferred into a trust before the trustmaker’s death. The petition presents evidence demonstrating that the real property was intended to be trust property and requests a court order that confirms trust ownership and directs the county recorder or title company to accept re-titling or transfers. Courts often grant such orders when the factual record supports the trustmaker’s intent and notice requirements have been met. After the court issues an order, the trustee can use certified copies of the order along with deed forms to complete re-titling with the county recorder and to satisfy title companies. This confirmation is particularly valuable when selling or refinancing property, since it provides third parties with judicial assurance about ownership that informal trust documents alone may not provide.
If someone objects to a Heggstad petition, the court will consider the objection and may set a hearing to resolve disputed facts. Objections might challenge the validity of the trust, the trustee’s authority, the sufficiency of evidence, or other legal points. When objections arise, the matter can require additional evidence, witness declarations, or legal briefing. Preparing for potential objections by compiling strong evidence and clear documentation reduces the chances of prolonged disputes. The court’s decision will depend on the evidence presented and the legal arguments from both sides. If the objection is sustained, the court may deny the petition or limit the scope of its order, potentially requiring formal probate or other remedies. Resolving objections often takes more time and may require negotiation or settlement discussions to avoid protracted litigation.
Alternatives to a Heggstad petition include pursuing full probate administration, attempting negotiated resolutions with banks and title companies, or using affidavit-based transfers when statutes permit. Probate provides a comprehensive process for distributing assets and addressing creditor claims but can be more time-consuming and expensive. Negotiating directly with institutions can sometimes avoid court filings if they accept trust documents, though this is not always successful. Choosing the right path depends on the number of assets, potential claims, and the willingness of third parties to cooperate. In some limited circumstances, statutory affidavit procedures or small estate options may apply, allowing certain transfers without probate or a Heggstad petition. These alternatives have specific eligibility requirements and may not be appropriate for all assets. Consulting on the available remedies helps trustees select the most efficient route to transfer property while safeguarding beneficiaries’ interests and meeting legal obligations.
The cost of pursuing a Heggstad petition depends on factors such as the complexity of the factual record, the need for supplemental documentation, the number of interested parties to notify, and whether objections arise. When matters are straightforward and uncontested, costs are generally lower because the court process can proceed without lengthy hearings. If the case becomes contested or requires extensive evidentiary support, expenses increase accordingly. We discuss potential fees and likely ranges during an initial consultation to provide realistic expectations. Cost-saving measures include organizing documents carefully, confirming that notice lists are accurate, and resolving potential issues with heirs through communication before filing. Early preparation and a focused petition reduce the time spent on court appearances and help control expenses. We provide transparent guidance on anticipated costs and assist trustees in making informed decisions about the most efficient path to confirmation of trust ownership.
While it is legally possible for a trustee to file a Heggstad petition without legal representation, the process involves court rules, notice requirements, and evidentiary standards that can be challenging to navigate for those unfamiliar with probate procedures. Courts expect filings to conform to local rules, and inadequate paperwork or improperly served notices can result in delays or denial. Legal guidance helps ensure the petition is properly prepared and increases the likelihood of achieving the desired court order efficiently. Seeking assistance can be especially beneficial when titles are complex, multiple heirs are involved, or institutions are reluctant to accept trust documentation. A well-prepared petition reduces the likelihood of objections and facilitates post-order actions, such as obtaining certified copies and completing transfers. Trustees should weigh the complexity of their situation against their comfort with legal procedures when deciding whether to proceed without representation.
After receiving a court order confirming trust ownership, a trustee should obtain certified copies of the order and present them to banks, title companies, and other institutions that require formal proof of authority to transfer or manage assets. The trustee should follow the institution-specific procedures for re-titling property, closing accounts, or completing sales, and ensure all actions comply with the trust’s distribution provisions. Keeping detailed records of post-order transactions supports transparency and beneficiary accounting requirements. Trustees should also confirm that notices and any required filings have been completed, and address remaining administrative tasks such as paying valid creditor claims, filing tax returns if necessary, and preparing final distributions. Maintaining clear communication with beneficiaries about how the court order affects asset administration helps reduce misunderstandings and supports an orderly closing of the trust’s affairs.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas