A trust modification petition can be an effective legal tool for adjusting a trust to reflect changed circumstances, updated intentions, or to address errors. Residents of North Fair Oaks and nearby communities often seek to modify revocable trusts to clarify distribution plans, add or remove beneficiaries, correct drafting issues, or respond to changes in family dynamics. The process typically begins with reviewing the existing trust document and identifying the legal grounds for modification, then preparing a petition that explains the requested changes and the reasons for them to the court. Timely, well-documented petitions protect your goals and reduce future disputes among beneficiaries.
When considering a petition to modify a trust, it helps to work with a law firm familiar with San Mateo County practice and local court procedures. Our office can guide you through evaluating eligibility for a modification petition, whether the trust is revocable or irrevocable, and what evidence or beneficiary consent may be needed. We prepare clear, persuasive petitions and accompanying declarations to present to the court, helping you pursue changes while minimizing delays and objections. With careful planning and attention to statutory requirements, a modification petition can restore clarity and effectiveness to an estate plan.
Filing a trust modification petition can preserve the intent of the settlor and ensure distributions match current circumstances, avoiding unintended outcomes. Benefits include resolving ambiguities in trust language, addressing changed financial situations or family relationships, and correcting mistakes that might otherwise cause litigation after the settlor’s death. Modifications can also modernize provisions to reflect tax law changes or new asset types. Pursuing a petition through the proper legal channels helps create a clear record of the requested changes and the reasons behind them, which reduces the likelihood of later disputes and strengthens the administration of the trust for trustees and beneficiaries alike.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman serve clients across North Fair Oaks, San Jose, and the wider San Mateo County area, focusing on thoughtful, client-centered estate planning and trust matters. We help clients assess whether a modification petition is appropriate, draft the necessary pleadings, and coordinate communications with trustees and beneficiaries. Our approach emphasizes clear communication, careful factual development, and practical strategies tailored to each family’s goals. We strive to minimize conflict and work efficiently with the probate court when petitions are required, combining legal knowledge with a practical sense for resolving complex trust issues.
A trust modification petition is a court filing asking a judge to approve changes to an existing trust or to resolve a legal question about a trust’s terms. Grounds for a petition may include ambiguous drafting, clerical errors, changed circumstances that make original terms impracticable, or the need to restructure distributions. Courts evaluate petitions based on statutory standards and whether proposed changes align with the settlor’s probable intent. Preparing a successful petition requires assembling relevant documents, drafting persuasive legal arguments, and, where appropriate, securing beneficiary consent or presenting evidence that supports the requested modification while protecting the trustee’s fiduciary duties.
The procedural steps for a trust modification petition often include notifying interested parties, filing the petition and supporting declarations, and attending a court hearing if objections arise. In many cases, reaching voluntary agreement among beneficiaries can streamline the process and avoid contested litigation, but court action may be necessary when parties disagree or when the requested change has complex legal implications. Working through each step methodically and with attention to local court rules and timelines reduces the risk of delays, ensures proper service on all interested persons, and improves the likelihood of a favorable resolution that honors the settlor’s wishes.
A trust modification petition asks the court to reform, revise, or clarify terms of an existing trust to better reflect the settlor’s intent or to address unforeseen circumstances. The petition typically explains the reason for the change, provides the relevant trust provisions, and offers supporting evidence such as declarations or documents that show the settlor’s probable intent. Courts consider whether the requested modification is consistent with the trust’s overall purpose and whether it is equitable among beneficiaries. The petition may also request specific judicial findings to guide trustees and beneficiaries in administering the trust moving forward.
Successful petitions generally include a clear statement of the requested modification, the factual background supporting the change, and legal authority for the court to grant relief. Essential components are proper notice to all interested persons, well-organized documentation of the trust and related instruments, and persuasive legal argument tailored to applicable California statutes and case law. The process may involve informal negotiation with beneficiaries, filing the petition with the probate court, and responding to any objections at a hearing. Properly prepared petitions reduce the risk of procedural flaws and promote a smoother judicial review and outcome.
Understanding common terms used in trust modification matters helps trustees and beneficiaries follow the process. Terms such as settlor, trustee, beneficiary, amendment, reformation, revocation, and decanting often arise, along with references to statutory authority that governs trust changes. Familiarity with these concepts clarifies the options available, how rights and duties shift, and what kinds of court orders may be requested. Clear definitions empower parties to communicate effectively and to make informed decisions when negotiating changes or preparing petitions for the probate court.
The settlor is the person who created the trust and established its terms, distributions, and purposes. The settlor’s intent—what they intended to accomplish with the trust—is central to many modification petitions. Courts consider the settlor’s probable intent when evaluating requests to modify or reform trust provisions, and documentary or testimonial evidence may be used to clarify that intent. In cases where the settlor is incapacitated or deceased, the court carefully assesses whether the proposed changes align with the settlor’s original objectives and the trust’s overall purpose.
Reformation is a judicial remedy used to correct mistakes in the trust document so that the instrument reflects the settlor’s actual intent. A reformation petition will typically present evidence that a drafting error or miscommunication led to language that does not match the settlor’s wishes. The court may order reformation to align the trust text with what was intended, provided there is sufficient proof of error and the resulting change is consistent with the trust’s purpose. Reformation preserves the settlor’s goals without creating new provisions that were never contemplated.
An amendment is a change made according to procedures specified in the trust document, often while the settlor is living and has the capacity to act, whereas a modification may refer to a court-ordered change when the trust cannot be amended by the settlor alone. Amendments typically follow the trust’s internal requirements for changes, while modification petitions request judicial authority to alter the trust due to ambiguity, changed circumstances, or other legal grounds. Understanding this distinction helps parties determine whether court involvement is necessary or whether a private amendment will suffice.
Beneficiary consent can play an important role in trust modification matters because unanimous, informed agreement among beneficiaries may obviate the need for contested court proceedings. When all interested parties agree to a proposed change, they can often execute agreements or stipulations that the court can adopt, speeding up the process and reducing costs. However, consent must be properly documented and legally effective, and courts will still assess whether the consented changes are valid under governing statutes and consistent with the settlor’s probable intent.
Clients considering changes to a trust may choose among several legal options depending on the trust terms and circumstances, including private amendment by the settlor, decanting where permitted, or filing a court petition for modification or reformation. Each route has advantages and trade-offs: private amendments are often quicker but require settlor capacity and proper execution, decanting can shift assets to a new trust with improved terms if allowed, and court petitions provide authoritative relief when private means are unavailable or contested. Evaluating these choices requires a careful review of trust language, beneficiary rights, and applicable law to select the most effective strategy.
A limited approach may be sufficient when the settlor is alive and retains the capacity to amend the trust under its terms. In such situations, the settlor can execute an amendment or restatement that specifically addresses the needed adjustments, such as adding or removing assets, changing trustee designations, or updating distribution provisions. These amendments are usually less costly and faster than court petitions, and they keep control of the trust changes in the hands of the person who created the trust. Proper drafting and execution according to state formalities are essential to ensure the amendment is valid and enforceable.
When all beneficiaries are agreeable and can provide informed, written consent, a limited approach through beneficiary agreement can resolve many trust issues without litigation. Parties can negotiate and document modifications or enter into settlement agreements that the trustee can follow. This collaborative path reduces legal fees, shortens timelines, and avoids potentially adversarial court proceedings. Even with unanimous consent, careful attention must be paid to legal formalities and to ensuring the agreement respects any statutory protections and the settlor’s documented intentions.
A comprehensive legal approach is warranted when beneficiaries dispute the meaning of trust provisions or when the settlor’s intent is unclear from the trust document and available evidence. In such cases, court intervention may be necessary to interpret language, reform provisions, or issue binding directives for trustees. Litigation provides a formal mechanism for weighing evidence, taking testimony if needed, and resolving competing claims. A full legal process helps establish clear, enforceable results that guide ongoing administration of the trust and reduce uncertainty.
When a trust holds complex assets, when tax implications are significant, or when competing claims threaten the trust’s purpose, a comprehensive petition strategy can protect beneficiaries’ interests and clarify administration. Court-approved modifications can address distribution timing, trustee powers, and tax planning measures that affect the trust’s overall value and operation. Ensuring the petition incorporates financial analysis and properly drafted orders prevents unintended consequences and supports stable management of trust assets for the long term.
A court-granted modification creates an authoritative record that clarifies the trust and reduces the likelihood of future disputes. Judicial approval can confirm the legality of changes, resolve ambiguous provisions, and provide clear directives for trustees. When changes are significant or contested, the formal process ensures that all interested parties receive notice and an opportunity to be heard, producing a final order that binds successors and promotes orderly trust administration. This certainty can be especially valuable for trusts that will remain in effect for many years.
Comprehensive petitions also protect trustees from future liability by obtaining judicial guidance on contested matters, clarifying their powers and duties under revised terms. When the court reviews a petition and issues an order, trustees have documented authority to act under the revised provisions without fear of later personal exposure. This protective effect helps trustees manage assets confidently and focus on carrying out the trust’s purpose without persistent concern about future challenges to their actions.
Securing a judicial order for a trust modification offers legal finality that private agreements may not achieve, especially when beneficiaries contest the change or absent parties cannot be located. A court’s ruling reconciles competing claims and issues a directive that governs trustee actions and beneficiary expectations. That clarity diminishes the risk of future challenges and streamlines administration. For families seeking long-term stability and certainty, obtaining formal judicial approval is often the most reliable path to preserving the settlor’s intent while minimizing ongoing disputes among heirs.
When a modification is approved by the court, trustees receive clear legal guidance regarding their duties, powers, and the scope of authorized actions under the revised trust. This clarity reduces ambiguity when managing investments, making distributions, or interpreting discretionary provisions. Clear court orders also assist successor trustees, heirs, and advisors who may rely on the revised terms years later, helping to ensure consistent administration over time and minimizing disagreements that can arise from uncertain trust language or conflicting interpretations.
Thorough documentation of the reasons for a requested modification helps the court understand the need for change and improves the petition’s credibility. Gather relevant communications, financial records, and any evidence that shows the settlor’s probable intent or demonstrates why the current provisions are impractical. Clear, organized documentation reduces uncertainty and can help persuade interested parties that the change serves the trust’s purpose. Proper records also facilitate settlement discussions and may encourage beneficiaries to agree without prolonged litigation.
Whenever feasible, seek to resolve proposed modifications through negotiation and written agreements among beneficiaries or with the trustee rather than contested court proceedings. Settlements save time and expense and often produce more flexible, tailored outcomes that reflect parties’ interests. Even if a petition is ultimately required, early settlement efforts can narrow issues, reduce litigation costs, and lead to an agreed order that the court can adopt. Document any agreements carefully to ensure they are enforceable and consistent with statutory requirements.
Consider a trust modification petition when the trust’s terms no longer reflect the settlor’s intent, when ambiguous provisions cause conflict, or when changed circumstances make original directives impracticable. Other reasons include correcting drafting mistakes, responding to tax or legal changes, and resolving disputes among beneficiaries that impede trust administration. A petition can provide judicial clarity that protects beneficiaries and trustees and aligns the trust with current realities. Timely action helps avoid more complicated disputes down the road and preserves the trust’s intended purposes.
You may also consider a petition when beneficiaries cannot be located to provide consent, when trustees are uncertain about their powers, or when competing claims threaten the estate’s value. Court involvement can authorize specific steps, confirm trustee authority, and produce a binding order that resolves contested issues. Engaging counsel early to evaluate the trust document and possible avenues for change helps identify whether a petition is necessary or whether alternative measures like amendment or beneficiary agreements might suffice. Early evaluation preserves options and saves time and expense.
Typical circumstances prompting petitions include drafting errors that contradict the settlor’s intent, changes in family relationships such as divorce or remarriage, the need to address new or previously unanticipated assets, and conflicts that prevent trustees from acting. Sometimes tax law changes or court rulings require updating trust terms for continued effectiveness. When a trust’s language produces uncertainty about distributions or trustee powers, a modification petition can provide an authoritative resolution and allow the trust to function as intended.
Ambiguous provisions can cause trustees and beneficiaries to disagree about distribution timing, conditions, or trustee discretion. When language is internally inconsistent or unclear, a petition can ask the court to interpret the terms or reform the document to reflect the settlor’s probable intent. Seeking judicial clarity helps trustees fulfill their duties without fear of future challenge and prevents beneficiaries from being disadvantaged by unclear administration. Clear court orders reduce misinterpretation and help the trust operate predictably.
Family changes such as divorce, births, deaths, or estrangements often prompt reconsideration of trust provisions. A modification petition can adjust beneficiary designations, alter distribution timing, or address new caretaking needs that were not contemplated when the trust was created. Courts will evaluate proposed changes in light of the trust’s purpose and the settlor’s likely wishes, but addressing shifts in family dynamics through formal proceedings can prevent gaps in the plan and reduce future conflicts among family members.
Drafting errors, omissions of provisions, or inconsistencies between related estate planning documents can undermine a trust’s administration. When such errors are discovered, a modification petition can correct the record through reformation or other judicial relief, aligning the document with the settlor’s intentions. Correcting mistakes early preserves the trust’s integrity and avoids contentious disputes after the settlor’s incapacity or death. Careful review of the trust and related documents is the first step toward resolving these concerns in an orderly fashion.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provide dedicated representation for residents of North Fair Oaks and nearby communities facing trust modification questions. We assist clients at every stage, from initial evaluation and document review to filing petitions and representing interests in probate court when needed. Our local knowledge of San Mateo County procedures and the local probate bench helps us prepare thorough petitions and manage communications with interested persons. We focus on minimizing conflict and reaching effective outcomes that honor the settlor’s intent while protecting beneficiaries’ rights and trustees’ obligations.
Our firm brings practical legal experience handling trust disputes and modification petitions across San Mateo County, offering clear guidance tailored to your family’s circumstances. We thoroughly review trust documents and related estate planning instruments, identify legal avenues for modification, and craft persuasive petitions or agreements for court consideration. We prioritize clear communication with clients and other parties, seeking to resolve matters efficiently and respectfully while protecting your legal rights and the integrity of the trust.
We emphasize strategic planning and thorough preparation, ensuring that petitions are supported by complete documentation and sound legal reasoning. When negotiations are possible, we pursue collaborative solutions to reduce cost and delay. When court proceedings become necessary, we advocate for outcomes that align with the settlor’s intent and provide clear directives for trustees. Our goal is to achieve stable, enforceable results that allow the trust to serve its purpose for beneficiaries into the future.
Clients benefit from our local familiarity with probate procedures and our experience advising on a wide range of trust instruments, including revocable living trusts, pour-over wills, and various trust subtypes such as special needs and irrevocable life insurance trusts. We assist with associated documents like powers of attorney, health care directives, and trust certifications, ensuring that the broader estate plan functions cohesively. Our approach focuses on practical solutions that reduce uncertainty and support orderly administration of trust assets.
Our process begins with a comprehensive review of the trust and related documents to determine whether a petition is appropriate and which legal grounds apply. We identify interested parties and handle required notices, prepare the petition and supporting declarations, and attempt resolution where possible. If litigation is necessary, we represent you in hearings and advocate for clear judicial orders. Throughout the process we keep clients informed, organize evidence to support the petition, and work to achieve efficient and enforceable outcomes that serve the trust’s purpose and the parties’ long-term interests.
The first step is a detailed review of the trust, any amendments, and related estate planning documents to understand the settlor’s goals and identify issues requiring correction or clarification. We collect relevant records, communications, and financial information that evidence intent or demonstrate impracticability. During this phase we determine whether beneficiary consent is feasible, whether alternative remedies exist, and what legal arguments and evidence will best support a petition. This assessment shapes the strategy and timeline for any petition or negotiation.
Gathering documentary evidence and relevant communications is essential to show why a modification is necessary and how it aligns with the settlor’s probable intent. This may include prior drafts, correspondence, financial records, or testimony from individuals familiar with the settlor’s wishes. Well-organized evidence strengthens the petition and helps the court understand the factual basis for a requested change. We assist clients in identifying and compiling this material to present a clear, persuasive case for modification or reformation.
We evaluate the procedural steps required by California probate law and San Mateo County rules, including service requirements, statutory notice timelines, and filing protocols. Proper procedural compliance avoids delays and jurisdictional challenges that can derail a petition. Our review includes identifying interested persons, preparing required forms, and ensuring all filings meet court standards. Anticipating procedural hurdles early allows us to plan for timely filings and reduces the risk of technical objections that could prolong the matter.
After assembling evidence and assessing procedural needs, we draft a petition that clearly sets forth the requested modification, the factual background, and the legal basis for relief. The petition includes supporting declarations, exhibits, and a proposed order for the court’s consideration. We prepare all necessary notices and coordinate service on interested parties. Careful drafting focuses the court on the essential issues and anticipates likely objections, positioning the petition for efficient judicial review and potential resolution without prolonged litigation.
Effective petitions present a clear narrative tying the facts to applicable legal standards, demonstrating why the requested modification aligns with the trust’s purpose and the settlor’s intent. We craft arguments that address statutory requirements and relevant case law, organizing evidence in a way that supports judicial findings. Clear, well-reasoned pleadings increase the likelihood the court will grant the requested relief or will facilitate settlement discussions among interested parties, reducing time and expense.
Once the petition and supporting materials are prepared, we file the documents with the appropriate probate court and ensure proper service on all interested persons as required by law. Proper filing and service protect the court’s authority to decide the matter and prevent later challenges based on defective procedure. We monitor the court calendar for hearings, respond to any procedural inquiries, and communicate with opposing parties to explore potential agreements or to prepare for contested hearings if necessary.
Following filing, the court may grant the petition without a hearing if the matter is uncontested, or the case may proceed to hearing if objections are raised. We represent clients at hearings, present evidence and legal argument, and seek orders that clearly specify revised terms and trustee directives. After a favorable ruling, we assist with implementing the changes, updating trust records, and advising trustees on carrying out the court’s order to ensure the trust operates in accordance with the revised terms and the settlor’s intent.
If a hearing is required, we prepare witness declarations, documentary exhibits, and argument focused on the legal standard for modification or reformation. We aim to present a concise, well-supported case that demonstrates why the requested change is appropriate and consistent with the settlor’s probable intent. Careful preparation reduces the risk of unexpected issues at the hearing and allows the court to make a reasoned decision that resolves disputes and provides clear instructions for trustees and beneficiaries.
After the court issues an order, we assist clients and trustees with the necessary steps to implement the change, including executing any required documents, updating trust records, and notifying financial institutions or other parties that manage trust assets. Following the court’s directives ensures the trust is administered according to the revised terms and helps prevent future disputes about compliance. We remain available to advise trustees on interpreting the order and handling any follow-up matters that arise during administration.
A trust modification petition is a court filing that requests a judge to change or clarify the terms of an existing trust when private amendment is not possible or when disputes arise. Petitions are commonly used to correct drafting errors, resolve ambiguous language, or address circumstances that make original provisions impracticable. The petition sets out the proposed change, the factual basis for it, and supporting evidence such as communications or documents that shed light on the settlor’s intent. Courts consider statutory standards and whether the requested modification aligns with the trust’s purpose. You might need a petition when the settlor cannot amend the trust due to incapacity or death, when beneficiaries cannot agree, or when legal or tax complexities require formal judicial approval. Filing a petition creates an official record and provides a binding judicial determination that clarifies trustee duties and beneficiary rights. Early consultation helps determine whether a petition is necessary or whether other options like beneficiary agreements or decanting are feasible alternatives.
Yes, a trust can sometimes be modified without court involvement if the settlor is alive and has capacity to execute an amendment according to the trust’s terms. When all beneficiaries are identifiable and provide informed, written consent, they may be able to agree to changes that the trustee can implement. Another private option is decanting, where assets are distributed into a new trust with improved terms if state law and the trust document allow. These private approaches tend to be faster and less costly than a court petition. Private modifications require careful documentation to ensure they are legally effective and enforceable. Even with unanimous consent, it is important to ensure the method used complies with California law and the trust’s internal requirements. In cases involving disputes, missing beneficiaries, or uncertainties about the settlor’s intent, a court petition may still be the most appropriate and reliable route.
Evidence to support a trust modification petition typically includes the trust document and any amendments, related estate planning records, financial documents, and communications that help demonstrate the settlor’s probable intent. Declarations from individuals with direct knowledge of the settlor’s intentions, prior drafts that reflect intended language, and correspondence that clarifies goals can all be persuasive. The objective is to create a factual record that shows why the proposed change aligns with the settlor’s wishes or corrects an identifiable error. In contested matters, carefully organized exhibits and witness statements are particularly important to address objections and to explain how the requested relief preserves the trust’s purpose. Courts weigh this evidence against statutory standards for reformation or modification, so thorough preparation and a clear factual narrative are crucial to success.
The timeline for a trust modification petition varies with complexity, the level of consent among interested parties, and county court schedules. Uncontested matters that resolve by agreement may be completed relatively quickly, while contested petitions can take months or longer depending on discovery needs, hearings, and potential appeals. San Mateo County probate timelines are influenced by court availability and whether parties raise procedural objections that delay proceedings. Planning for potential delays and addressing procedural requirements promptly can reduce overall time. Early identification of interested parties, careful evidence collection, and proactive communication often speed resolution. If prompt relief is needed, discussing expedited options and procedural strategies with counsel at the outset helps set realistic expectations about a likely timeline.
Modifying a trust can have tax implications depending on the nature of the change, the types of assets involved, and the tax characteristics of the trust. Some modifications may alter income tax reporting, estate tax exposure, or beneficiary tax outcomes. Changes that affect how assets are titled or distributed can also trigger reporting or tax consequences. Evaluating the tax impact alongside the proposed legal changes helps avoid unintended financial results and ensures the modification supports overall planning objectives. Because tax outcomes depend on specific facts and the types of trusts involved, it is often advisable to coordinate with tax advisors in addition to legal counsel. This coordination helps identify potential tax consequences early and enables drafting of a modification that mitigates adverse effects while achieving the settlor’s objectives.
When beneficiaries object to a proposed modification, the court will typically schedule a hearing where the parties can present evidence and legal argument. Objections may raise issues such as lack of authority for the change, insufficient evidence of settlor intent, or procedural defects in notice or service. The court will consider the objections in light of statutory standards and the evidence presented before deciding whether to grant, modify, or deny the petition. Objections do not necessarily prevent a favorable result; resolving factual disputes through declarations or testimony can sometimes persuade the court. Mediation or settlement discussions during the litigation process can also produce an agreeable resolution without protracted hearings. Preparing a strong factual record and engaging in constructive negotiation often reduce conflict and lead to practical outcomes.
Yes, a trustee may file a petition to modify a trust when circumstances require court guidance, such as when the trustee faces conflicting beneficiary claims or uncertainty about the scope of trustee powers. Trustees sometimes seek judicial instructions to limit liability and obtain authoritative directives on how to administer the trust under challenging conditions. A trustee’s petition typically explains the operational difficulties and requests specific findings or clarifications to permit prudent administration. Filing by a trustee emphasizes the need for clear, enforceable instructions to perform fiduciary duties properly. Courts weigh the trustee’s position and the interests of beneficiaries, and a trustee-appointed petition can result in orders that protect trustees from future liability while facilitating reliable management of trust assets.
Notice to interested parties is a fundamental procedural requirement for trust modification petitions and is governed by California probate rules. The petitioner must identify beneficiaries, heirs, and any other persons with an interest in the trust and provide them with required documents and proof of service. Proper notice gives parties the opportunity to object or participate in the proceeding, and failure to provide correct notice can lead to delays or challenges to the court’s jurisdiction. Because effective notice is critical, we carefully locate and identify interested persons and follow statutory service procedures. When parties cannot be located, the court may allow alternative methods of notice or other measures to ensure due process. Handling notice correctly at the outset protects the validity of any resulting order.
Alternatives to modifying a trust by petition include private amendment by the settlor when they have capacity, beneficiary agreements, and decanting into a new trust where allowed. These options can be faster and less costly than court action and may achieve the desired changes without judicial involvement. They are appropriate when the settlor can act or when beneficiaries agree and legal requirements for the alternative method are satisfied. Each alternative has legal constraints and must be executed carefully to ensure enforceability. For example, decanting is subject to statutory limits and may not be available for all trusts. Consulting counsel to assess whether an alternative is valid and to document the process protects parties’ interests and reduces the risk of later disputes.
Costs for filing a trust modification petition in San Mateo County vary depending on case complexity, whether matters are contested, and attorney and court fees. Basic fees include the court filing fee and potential costs for service, but attorney fees and additional expenses such as preparing declarations, gathering evidence, and attending hearings typically make up the largest portion of the overall cost. Uncontested matters resolved by agreement are generally less expensive than contested litigation, which increases time and resources required. It is helpful to obtain a clear estimate early and to discuss fee structures, including flat fees for specific tasks or hourly rates for litigation. Exploring settlement options and preparing a focused petition can reduce time in court and associated costs. We provide transparent fee discussions so clients understand likely expenses and can make informed decisions about pursuing a petition.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas