A Heggstad petition can be a vital tool for families facing issues with trust property that was not transferred correctly into a living trust. At the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman, we help clients in Pacifica and San Mateo County navigate the procedural steps necessary to bring improperly titled assets under their trust. A petition to the court can confirm that property belongs to the decedent’s trust and allow the trustee to take control without a full probate case. This introduction outlines what a Heggstad petition does, who might need one, and how it fits into broader estate planning work in California.
Many people create revocable living trusts to avoid probate and provide continuity for beneficiaries, yet assets sometimes remain titled in the decedent’s name. A Heggstad petition asks the superior court to recognize that property was intended to be part of the trust despite the title. This process is typically quicker and less costly than probate, though it requires careful documentation and proof of intent or trust terms. This paragraph explains the basic purpose, typical timeline, and the kinds of records and affidavits that commonly support a successful petition in San Mateo County and surrounding areas.
Filing a Heggstad petition can restore the intended operation of a trust by confirming ownership of assets that were overlooked at the settlor’s death. The key benefits include streamlined transfer of title, avoidance of a full probate administration for specific assets, and clarity for banks, title companies, and successor trustees who may otherwise refuse to recognize the trust’s authority. In practical terms, it can reduce delays and additional costs while honoring the decedent’s plan. Proper preparation and supporting documents are essential to maximize these benefits and prevent contested outcomes from beneficiaries or third parties.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman serves clients in Pacifica, San Jose, and throughout California with a focus on trust administration and estate planning matters. Our approach emphasizes thorough document review, clear communication, and practical steps to achieve client goals while minimizing court involvement where possible. We assist with Heggstad petitions, trust funding guidance, related filings such as certification of trust, and coordination with title companies and financial institutions. Clients receive careful attention to timelines and documentation needed to support petitions and to help trustees carry out the settlor’s intentions efficiently and respectfully.
A Heggstad petition is a specific type of court filing used in California to ask a probate court to declare that certain property belonged to a decedent’s revocable trust at the time of death. This can occur when deeds, accounts, or other assets were never retitled into the trust even though the trust document indicates they were intended to be trust property. The petition typically includes the trust instrument, death certificate, declarations from the trustee, and any supporting evidence that demonstrates the settlor’s intent. The process can resolve title issues, enabling the trustee to manage or transfer the assets according to the trust terms.
The court evaluates evidence of the settlor’s intent, the trust terms, and the circumstances surrounding the asset’s titling at death. If the judge grants the petition, a court order will be issued confirming that the asset is trust property and instructing relevant parties to transfer title to the trustee. This avoids a full probate estate administration for the particular asset and helps successor trustees handle real property, bank accounts, or investment accounts more smoothly. Knowing which records and affidavits work best and how to present them is an important part of preparing a successful petition.
A Heggstad petition asks the probate court to recognize that property improperly titled in a deceased person’s name should be treated as trust property under the terms of a revocable living trust. The petition is grounded in case law and statutes allowing courts to correct title when the settlor clearly intended that the trust would own the property. Typical examples include deeds not transferred, bank accounts left in the decedent’s name, or retirement accounts with ambiguous beneficiary designations. The petition lays out factual evidence, trust provisions, and legal arguments to convince the court that the asset belongs to the trust.
Effective Heggstad petitions rely on clear documentation showing the settlor’s intent, including a complete trust instrument, relevant deeds or account statements, and contemporaneous evidence such as transfer drafts or instructions. Declarations from the trustee and any necessary witnesses often explain how the omission occurred and why the trust should control the property. The petition will identify parties with an interest in the asset, propose notice to heirs or beneficiaries, and request a specific court order confirming trust ownership. Attention to procedural requirements, accurate legal descriptions, and timely notice are essential components of the process.
Understanding the common terms used in trust funding and Heggstad petitions helps trustees and beneficiaries follow the legal process. Terms such as ‘trustee,’ ‘settlor,’ ‘probate,’ ‘transfer on death,’ and ‘constructive trust’ frequently arise in filings and communications with financial institutions. Clear definitions reduce confusion when preparing supporting documents and ensure correct legal descriptions and account designations. This section lists basic definitions you’ll encounter and explains why each concept matters when drafting petitions or requesting that title companies accept trust authority to transfer property out of a decedent’s name and into the trust.
A trustee is the person or entity appointed in a trust document to hold legal title to trust assets and manage those assets for the benefit of the trust’s beneficiaries. The trustee has a fiduciary duty to act in the beneficiaries’ best interests, to follow the trust terms, and to preserve and administer trust property. When a Heggstad petition is filed, the trustee typically petitions the court to confirm that a particular asset is trust property so the trustee can legally manage and distribute it under the trust terms. Trustees often need to provide declarations and documentation to support the petition.
The settlor or grantor is the individual who created the trust and transferred property into it or intended that property be held for the trust’s benefit. The settlor sets the terms of the trust, designates successor trustees, and specifies how assets are to be used or distributed. Evidence of the settlor’s intent is central to a Heggstad petition because the court will consider whether the settlor meant for the asset to be included in the trust despite any failure to retitle it before death. Trust documents, correspondence, and related records often shed light on the settlor’s intent.
Probate is the court-supervised process to settle a decedent’s estate, pay debts, and distribute assets according to a will or intestate succession if no will exists. Probate can be time-consuming and costly, which is why many people use revocable living trusts to avoid it for trust assets. A Heggstad petition can prevent an otherwise unnecessary probate administration by proving that an asset should be treated as trust property. When the court grants the petition, the asset moves under the trustee’s control and does not need to go through a full probate proceeding, reducing delay and public filings.
A Certification of Trust is a shortened document that provides key details about a trust—such as the trust’s existence, the trustee’s name, and the trustee’s powers—without revealing the trust’s full terms. Financial institutions and title companies often accept a certification in place of the complete trust document to confirm the trustee’s authority. When filing a Heggstad petition or requesting transfers, presenting a properly executed Certification of Trust can streamline the process and reduce unnecessary disclosure of confidential provisions while still proving that the trustee has authority to administer or transfer the asset.
When confronted with assets that were not retitled into a trust, people must choose among several legal paths: file a Heggstad petition, open a probate administration, or pursue transactional solutions with financial institutions. A Heggstad petition is often faster and less public than full probate for specific assets, but it requires persuasive evidence of intent and proper notice to interested parties. In some situations, institutions may accept affidavits or transfer forms without court involvement. Comparing timeframes, costs, privacy, and risk of contest helps determine the best route in each case, and careful planning reduces the likelihood of needing court relief.
For certain small accounts or assets, financial institutions or title companies may accept affidavits, transfer-on-death forms, or a Certification of Trust to change ownership without a court order. If the asset’s value is modest and the institution’s policies allow direct transfer to a trustee or beneficiary, a transactional approach can avoid the time and expense of filing a petition. However, differing institutional requirements and potential challenges from heirs mean that careful documentation is still necessary. Confirming the institution’s precise requirements and preparing clear supporting records improves the chance of a successful nonjudicial transfer.
When assets carry binding beneficiary designations or payable-on-death instructions that directly pass outside of probate, those mechanisms often resolve title without court involvement. For example, accounts with valid beneficiary designations or vehicles with transfer-on-death registration may pass directly to the named parties. In such cases, trustees and heirs can follow the institution’s procedures to claim the asset. Careful review of the account documents and coordination with the trustee ensures that transfers align with the overall estate plan and do not inadvertently create conflicts between designated beneficiaries and trust terms.
When ownership is ambiguous or multiple parties claim an interest in the same asset, a Heggstad petition can provide definitive legal clarity by asking the court to declare the property part of the trust. Competing heirs, unclear deeds, or accounts with outdated registrations often require judicial resolution. The court’s order provides legal weight that financial institutions and title companies recognize, reducing the risk of future disputes. Preparing the petition with thorough documentation and legal arguments improves the chance of a favorable ruling and reduces exposure to contested litigation later on.
Some banks, brokerages, and title companies will not transfer assets based on affidavits or a Certification of Trust alone and insist on a court order. When institutions refuse to recognize the trustee’s authority without judicial confirmation, a Heggstad petition becomes the practical solution to complete the transfer. The petition compels recognition of the trust’s ownership, enabling the trustee to obtain title, access funds, or list and sell property as needed. Addressing these institutional obstacles through the court process ensures the trust functions as intended and assets are managed properly.
A comprehensive approach combines careful pre-filing documentation, targeted communication with institutions, and a well-prepared petition when court involvement is necessary. This strategy reduces delays by anticipating common objections, securing clear legal descriptions, and delivering persuasive declarations that support the settlor’s intent. When the firm coordinates with title companies, banks, and beneficiaries ahead of filing, the petition process tends to proceed more smoothly. The result is a more predictable timeline and reduced risk of procedural errors that could prolong the matter or invite disputes.
Taking a thorough approach safeguards privacy and estate value by avoiding unnecessary open probate proceedings and by resolving title issues with minimal public filings. It also ensures trustees have the documents needed to manage assets responsibly and to comply with fiduciary duties. When transfer problems are anticipated and addressed proactively, beneficiaries benefit from clearer communication and faster distribution of assets. Courts appreciate petitions that present organized evidence and clear legal claims, which can contribute to quicker judicial resolution and enforceable orders that streamline trust administration.
A comprehensive strategy focused on documentation and communication helps reduce the delays frequently associated with mis-titled assets. By assembling deeds, account records, trust instruments, and trustee declarations before filing, the petition can proceed on a clearer footing, reducing the need for repeated court appearances or supplemental filings. This approach limits administrative burden for trustees, reduces waiting periods for beneficiaries, and minimizes the potential for contested disputes. Thoughtful preparation allows the trustee to act sooner to protect assets and fulfill the trust’s distribution plan efficiently.
Presenting the court with a well-documented petition strengthens the legal position and increases the likelihood that banks and title companies will accept the resulting court order. Clear evidence of the settlor’s intent, accurate legal descriptions, and properly executed certifications minimize the chance that third parties will resist the transfer. A thoughtfully prepared petition anticipates common questions and provides courts the information they need to issue a decisive order. Institutional acceptance following a clear order streamlines the trustee’s ability to manage, sell, or distribute the asset in accordance with trust terms.
Begin by collecting the complete trust instrument, all deeds, account statements, beneficiary designations, and any correspondence that shows the settlor’s intent. Early assembly of these documents helps identify which assets were not retitled and reduces the risk of last-minute surprises. Bank and title company rules vary, so review account agreements and deed histories to understand potential objections. Keep originals or certified copies secure and prepare clear summaries of each asset’s status to streamline conversations with institutions and to support a concise court filing if a petition becomes necessary.
When filing a petition, make sure notice requirements are met for heirs, beneficiaries, and any other parties with potential claims. Transparent notice and early outreach reduce the likelihood of contested hearings and help resolve potential objections before they escalate. If disputes do arise, timely communication and documentation often narrow the issues for the court, making resolution more efficient. Maintaining respectful, evidence-based correspondence with interested parties supports both the petition process and the trustee’s ongoing ability to administer the trust smoothly.
You should consider a Heggstad petition when trust assets have not been retitled and institutions refuse to transfer them without judicial confirmation. The petition is designed to address precisely this scenario by asking the probate court to declare certain property part of the decedent’s trust. Choosing this path can prevent the trustee from having to open a full probate administration, save time in accessing or selling property, and provide a clear, enforceable remedy that institutions accept. Assess the value of the asset, the complexity of title, and the potential for objections when deciding whether to file.
Other reasons include ambiguous beneficiary designations, competing claims from heirs, or assets with outdated depositions that cannot be resolved through simple affidavits or institutional procedures. When an asset’s legal status is uncertain and the trustee needs immediate authority to manage it, a court order can provide the necessary clarity. The petition process is tailored to secure recognition of trust ownership for specific items rather than creating a broad probate estate, making it an efficient targeted solution when properly supported by documentation and declarations.
Common situations include real property with a deed still in the decedent’s name, bank and brokerage accounts not retitled to the trust, vehicles without transfer documents, and retirement plans with unclear beneficiary designations. The Heggstad petition remedies such situations by seeking a judicial declaration that the asset belongs to the trust. Other scenarios include overlooked safe deposit contents, digital assets held in personal accounts, and errors in recording transactions that leave title inconsistent with the trust document. Identifying these circumstances early helps trustees collect supporting evidence and plan the correct legal response.
One frequent circumstance is when a home or other real property retains a deed in the decedent’s individual name rather than in the trust. This can occur due to oversight, timing, or clerical errors. When the deed does not reflect the trust despite clear trust language, the trustee may need a Heggstad petition to obtain a court order confirming that the property belongs to the trust. The petition will include the trust, death certificate, deed history, and declarations explaining why retitling was not completed, enabling the trustee to record any corrective documents after the court’s decision.
Bank and investment accounts often require separate retitling or beneficiary designations, and accounts that remain in the decedent’s name can hamper the trustee’s ability to access funds. Financial institutions may ask for additional proof of entitlement or refuse to transfer assets without a court order. Filing a Heggstad petition provides clear legal recognition that the assets are trust property and allows the trustee to obtain control. Preparing account records, statements, and correspondence that show the settlor’s intent strengthens the petition and expedites institutional cooperation.
Vehicles, retirement accounts, and smaller personal property can also be affected by improper titling or outdated beneficiary designations. Even items with lower monetary value may require legal action if institutions will not recognize trust authority without a court order. A targeted petition focusing on specific assets resolves title questions without creating a probate estate for unrelated property. The trustee should gather registration documents, account paperwork, and any instructions left by the settlor to demonstrate the intended inclusion of these assets in the trust and to support the court’s determination.
We assist Pacifica residents with Heggstad petitions, trust funding issues, and related estate planning and administration matters. Our office coordinates directly with San Mateo County courts and local title companies to facilitate efficient resolution of mis-titled assets. We guide trustees through procedural steps from document assembly to service of notice and court appearances if needed, helping reduce delays and uncertainty. Whether you are handling a small account or significant real property, we provide practical legal support to secure trust ownership and to help trustees fulfill their duties responsibly and with clear documentation.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provides focused legal services in estate planning and trust administration to clients across Pacifica and San Mateo County. We emphasize careful document review and practical solutions tailored to each client’s situation, preparing petitions and coordinating with institutions to minimize delay. Our goal is to obtain clear court orders when necessary, and to help trustees secure and manage trust property efficiently. Clients benefit from responsive communication, clear timelines, and a steady focus on preserving estate value while respecting the settlor’s intentions.
We work closely with title companies, banks, and court clerks to ensure filings meet local procedural norms and institutional expectations. This coordination can make a meaningful difference in achieving timely transfers and reducing the need for multiple corrections. By anticipating common documentation requests and preparing robust supporting declarations, the firm seeks to shorten the administrative burden on trustees and beneficiaries. Our practical orientation helps align the legal process with real-world concerns, such as avoiding unnecessary probate and protecting privacy when possible.
Clients receive clear guidance on when a petition is the most appropriate remedy versus pursuing institutional or transactional pathways. We explain the implications for timing, costs, and notice requirements so trustees can make informed decisions. The firm’s approach stresses careful evidence collection, transparent communication with interested parties, and efficient court presentation when needed. For Pacifica families confronting mis-titled assets, this combination of thorough preparation and focused advocacy aims to resolve title issues while preserving estate assets and honoring the settlor’s plan.
Our process begins with an initial consultation to identify the assets at issue and to review the trust and supporting paperwork. We then gather the necessary documents, prepare trustee declarations, and contact institutions to explore nonjudicial resolutions where appropriate. If a petition is required, we draft the petition, prepare required notices, and file with the San Mateo County probate court. Throughout the process we keep trustees and beneficiaries informed, coordinate any requested follow-up, and seek a court order confirming trust ownership so the trustee can proceed with administration or distribution.
In the first step we collect the trust document, deeds, account statements, beneficiary designations, and any correspondence showing the settlor’s intent. This assessment identifies assets needing retitling, the institutional rules that apply, and whether a petition is likely necessary. The preliminary work includes reviewing the trust’s language, confirming successor trustee authority, and evaluating potential objections from heirs. A thorough early assessment helps shape strategy, whether that is a transactional solution with an institution or the preparation of a Heggstad petition with supporting declarations and exhibits for court filing.
We assist trustees in locating and organizing trust instruments, deeds, account agreements, and records of transfers. This documentation forms the backbone of any petition and supports institutional requests. Careful review of records helps determine whether assets were intended to be trust property and reveals any inconsistencies that need explanation. By creating clear, labeled exhibits and summaries, trustees can present a coherent narrative to both institutions and the court, which improves the chances of a smooth transfer and reduces the need for follow-up documentation requests.
Before filing a petition we contact banks, brokerages, and title companies to learn what evidence they will accept. In some cases, these institutions will allow transfers with a Certification of Trust or specific affidavits, avoiding court involvement. When institutions refuse a nonjudicial transfer, we document their requirements and prepare the records needed for filing. Early institutional outreach can identify hurdles in advance, enabling us to craft a petition that directly addresses foreseeable objections and conforms to the institution’s expectations for a court order.
If a court order is needed, we prepare the Heggstad petition with the trust, relevant exhibits, trustee declarations, and a proposed order tailored to institutional needs. The petition identifies interested parties, provides legal and factual support for the claim that the asset belongs to the trust, and requests the court’s declaration of ownership. We ensure procedural requirements such as proper service and filing formats are met, and we monitor the court’s docket for any procedural responses. Thoughtful preparation reduces the risk of continuances and supports timely judicial resolution.
Declarations from the trustee and any witnesses are drafted to explain the factual background, how the omission occurred, and why the trust should control the asset. Exhibits typically include the trust instrument, the decedent’s death certificate, deeds, statements, and any communications that demonstrate intent. The declarations are written to be concise, factual, and persuasive, helping the court understand the circumstances without unnecessary complexity. Clear exhibits and declarations minimize the likelihood of supplemental hearings and support a straightforward order confirming ownership.
After filing the petition we serve required parties and confirm compliance with notice rules. We track court scheduling, respond to any petitions to intervene or objections, and attend hearings when necessary. If the petition is uncontested, the court may grant the requested order efficiently; contested matters require additional litigation steps. We prepare bundled pleadings and proposed orders that align with local court practices to streamline the judge’s review process. Our aim is to secure an enforceable order that institutions will accept for title transfer.
Once the court issues an order confirming trust ownership, we assist the trustee in recording deeds, updating account registrations, and presenting the court order to financial institutions to complete transfers. We prepare any additional documentation those institutions request and coordinate the steps required to put assets under the trustee’s control. Finalizing transfers allows trustees to manage, sell, or distribute assets according to the trust terms. We also advise on trust administration tasks that follow, such as inventorying assets, paying debts, and making distributions to beneficiaries.
When the order covers real property, the trustee typically records a certified copy of the court order and any required corrective deed in the county recorder’s office. We prepare the documents and guide the trustee through recording requirements and tax reporting implications. Recording the order and the deed places the title in the trust’s name and resolves public record inconsistencies. After recording, the trustee can manage or sell the property under the trust’s terms, reducing the risk of future disputes about ownership among heirs or third parties.
For bank and investment accounts, the trustee presents the certified court order, a Certification of Trust if appropriate, and identification documents to effect transfers. Institutions may require specific forms or confirmation language, which we prepare in advance to avoid repeated requests. Once institutions accept the order and process the transfer, accounts can be retitled or funds distributed according to the trust. This step completes the legal transition of assets into the trustee’s control and enables the trustee to fulfill the trust’s management and distribution directives.
A Heggstad petition is a court filing in California that asks the probate court to declare that specific property was intended to be trust property at the time of the settlor’s death, despite not being retitled into the trust. The petition is appropriate when a deed, bank account, vehicle registration, or other asset remains in the decedent’s name but the trust document indicates it should have been held by the trust. The court considers evidence of the settlor’s intent, trust provisions, and any relevant transactional history when deciding whether to grant the petition. You should consider filing when financial institutions or title companies refuse to complete transfers based on affidavits or Certifications of Trust, or when competing claims make institutional compliance unlikely. Filing is also advisable when the asset is significant in value or when clear judicial confirmation will prevent future disputes. Preparing a strong packet of documents and declarations increases the likelihood of a successful outcome, and our office can help identify the specific evidence the court will expect in San Mateo County.
The timeline for a Heggstad petition varies depending on factors such as court schedules, whether the petition is contested, and the completeness of supporting documents. In an uncontested matter with complete exhibits and proper notice, some petitions may be resolved within a few months from filing to the court’s order. However, contested petitions or those requiring additional evidence can take longer, sometimes extending into several months or more depending on hearings and procedural steps. Working proactively to gather documents, provide clear declarations, and address potential objections early can shorten the timeline. We coordinate with court clerks to understand expected processing times and prepare petitions that conform to local practice, reducing delays caused by technical errors or incomplete filings. Our goal is to present the matter for efficient judicial review while ensuring all notice and procedural obligations are met.
Supporting documents typically include the complete trust instrument, the decedent’s death certificate, deeds or account statements demonstrating current title, and any correspondence that evidences the settlor’s intent to include the asset in the trust. Declarations from the trustee and any witnesses that explain the circumstances of the omission are also important. In addition, a Certification of Trust, if permitted by the institution, and a proposed order tailored to the entity’s requirements may be filed to facilitate transfers after the court order. The exact documents needed depend on the asset type and the institution’s policies. For real property, a title history and recorded documents are helpful; for financial accounts, recent statements and account agreements are often required. Identifying and assembling these materials early helps produce a coherent petition and can increase the likelihood that the court grants the requested order.
A Heggstad petition can avoid probate for the specific asset that is the subject of the petition by obtaining a court declaration that the property belongs to the trust. This targeted remedy resolves title for those assets without opening a full probate estate for all of the decedent’s property. However, the petition only affects the particular asset addressed; other assets not held by the trust still may require separate administration or probate if they lack appropriate transfer mechanisms. If the estate contains multiple mis-titled assets, several petitions or other remedies may be necessary to avoid probate completely. Our office helps trustees evaluate whether concentrated petitions or alternative transactional approaches with institutions will best achieve the goal of keeping assets out of probate while respecting legal and institutional requirements.
Yes, beneficiaries, heirs, or other interested parties can contest a Heggstad petition by filing an objection or petition to intervene in the court proceeding. Contests typically focus on disputes over whether the settlor intended the asset to be part of the trust or on competing claims to ownership. When objections arise, the court will consider evidence from all parties before deciding whether to grant the requested declaration of trust ownership. Contested matters can extend timelines and increase costs. Early communication, transparent notice, and strong documentary support for the settlor’s intent often reduce the likelihood of successful challenges. When disputes arise, we represent trustees in responding to objections and presenting the factual record that supports inclusion of the asset in the trust.
Costs for filing a Heggstad petition vary based on court filing fees, service costs, and professional fees for preparing documents and attending hearings. Simple, uncontested petitions tend to incur lower costs, while contested matters require more attorney time and potentially additional court proceedings, increasing overall expense. The value and complexity of the asset, the number of interested parties, and the need for expert reports or title work also influence the cost. We provide an initial assessment to estimate likely fees and walk clients through the components of cost, including any potential additional expenses for record retrieval, title reports, or posting bond if required. Our focus is on presenting an efficient path to resolution while clarifying budget expectations at the outset.
If the court denies a Heggstad petition, the trustee may need to explore alternative remedies, which could include filing a full probate administration for the asset, attempting negotiated resolution with institutions or heirs, or correcting title through other available procedures. The denial may be based on insufficient evidence of the settlor’s intent or unresolved competing claims. Carefully reviewing the court’s reasons helps determine whether a renewed petition with additional evidence or a different legal approach is appropriate. When a petition is denied, we analyze the court’s findings and counsel trustees on next steps to protect estate value and to pursue available legal or transactional options. In some situations, parties reach mediated settlements or provide additional affidavits or records that address the court’s concerns and permit a subsequent successful filing.
Yes, some mis-titled assets can be resolved without court intervention if financial institutions or title companies accept a Certification of Trust, affidavits, or transfer-on-death designations. This path is more likely for smaller assets or when institutions have clear procedures for nonjudicial transfers. Proactively contacting institutions to learn their requirements and presenting well-organized documentation often resolves matters without filing a petition. However, when institutions refuse to transfer property or when competing claims exist, court confirmation through a Heggstad petition may be required. We evaluate the likely success of nonjudicial routes and attempt those avenues first when appropriate, reserving petitions for situations where judicial authority is necessary to secure clear title.
A Heggstad petition can apply to many types of property, including vehicles and certain retirement accounts, depending on the circumstances and how each asset is titled. Retirement accounts with beneficiary designations may pass outside of trust administration, but where titling or beneficiary instructions conflict with the trust terms, a petition can clarify ownership. Vehicles that remain in the decedent’s name and will not be transferred by the DMV without court confirmation are common subjects of petitions. Each asset type has specific documentary requirements and institutional procedures. For retirement accounts, plan administrators have distinct forms and sometimes litigation thresholds. For vehicles, county DMV rules and title documentation are important. We tailor petitions and supporting exhibits to the asset type to meet institutional and court expectations.
To start the process, contact the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman for an initial consultation where we will review the trust documents and identify assets that may require a petition. Bring any deeds, account statements, beneficiary forms, and the trust instrument if available. During the consultation we will assess whether a nonjudicial transfer is feasible or whether a Heggstad petition is the best remedy and outline the likely steps, documents, and timeline for resolution. If you decide to proceed, we will assist in assembling the necessary exhibits, preparing trustee declarations, contacting institutions, and filing the petition if required. We also handle service of notice and court follow-up, keeping clients informed at every step to ensure a clear and organized path to title resolution.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas