A trust modification petition can be an important step when the settlor or interested parties need to change the terms of an existing trust in response to changed circumstances. At the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman, we assist Portola Valley clients with clear explanations of when a petition may be appropriate, which courts have jurisdiction, and how modifications may affect beneficiaries and trustees. This introductory overview explains the basic grounds for modification, typical timelines, and how a thoughtful approach can help preserve family relationships and uphold the settlor’s intent while complying with California law.
Many trust modification matters arise from life events such as remarriage, changing tax laws, or the settlor becoming incapacitated. Our practice emphasizes careful document review and open communication with trustees and beneficiaries to identify practical solutions. We outline both informal and formal paths to modify a trust, including settlement agreements among parties and court petitions when agreements are not possible. Clients in Portola Valley benefit from personalized guidance that explains possible outcomes and steps to reduce contention, aiming to reach a resolution that aligns with the settlor’s objectives and the legal framework applicable in San Mateo County.
A trust modification petition can protect the long-term intentions of the settlor by correcting provisions that are outdated, ambiguous, or impossible to carry out. It can also address changes in family dynamics, asset composition, or tax consequences, ensuring the trust continues to serve its intended purpose. Pursuing a petition provides a legal pathway to resolve disputes, clarify trustee powers, and secure court approval for changes that might otherwise be challenged. For Portola Valley residents, taking a proactive stance through a petition can minimize future conflicts and provide reassurance that the trust will operate as intended under California law.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman serves clients across San Jose, Portola Valley, and the surrounding Bay Area with focused estate planning and trust administration services. Our approach centers on clear communication, thorough document review, and tailored strategies that reflect each family’s unique needs. We represent petitioners and beneficiaries in trust modification matters, helping them navigate procedural requirements and negotiate resolutions when appropriate. Clients can expect careful preparation of court filings, diligent attention to deadlines, and ongoing guidance to help manage sensitive family issues during the modification process.
A trust modification petition is a formal request to the probate court to alter the terms of an existing trust when circumstances justify changes or when parties cannot reach agreement informally. Under California law, modifications may be sought for a variety of reasons including mistake, changed circumstances, or to achieve the settlor’s current intent. The court reviews evidence, considers the interests of beneficiaries, and evaluates whether the proposed modification is consistent with the trust’s purpose. This process can involve negotiations among interested parties and, in some cases, hearings to resolve factual or legal disputes.
Before filing a petition, it is important to review trust documents, related estate planning instruments, and communications that reflect the settlor’s intentions. Courts will weigh factors such as whether the settlor had capacity when making changes and whether beneficiaries were properly informed. A clear factual record and carefully drafted petition increase the chances of a favorable outcome. Our team helps gather declarations, supporting documents, and legal authority to present a persuasive case, while also exploring settlement opportunities to avoid prolonged litigation and reduce emotional and financial strain on the family.
A trust modification petition asks the probate court to approve a change to the terms of a trust or to resolve disagreements about trust administration. Modifications can address clerical errors, ambiguous language, or substantive changes needed because of shifting family circumstances or legal developments. The court considers the settlor’s original intent, the interests of current beneficiaries, and applicable statutes when deciding whether to grant a petition. This process provides a structured legal remedy when parties cannot resolve issues by agreement, while enabling a judge to issue a binding directive that clarifies rights and duties under the trust.
Key elements of a trust modification petition include a clear statement of the requested change, factual declarations supporting why modification is necessary or appropriate, and identification of all interested parties. The filing must comply with procedural rules for notice and service so beneficiaries have the opportunity to respond. Courts may hold hearings to evaluate evidence and determine whether the requested modification aligns with the trust’s purpose. Throughout the process, parties may negotiate settlement agreements to resolve disputes without a contested hearing, which can save time and expense while preserving relationships among family members.
Understanding common terms used in trust modification matters helps clarify the legal process and what to expect. Familiarity with definitions such as settlor, trustee, beneficiary, petition, decanting, and court jurisdiction enables clients to follow procedural steps and communicate effectively with counsel. This glossary provides straightforward explanations of terms frequently used in petitions and court proceedings, empowering clients in Portola Valley and San Mateo County to make informed decisions about potential modifications and the consequences those changes may have for asset distribution and fiduciary duties.
The settlor is the person who created and funded the trust originally and whose intent guides how the trust should operate. When considering a petition to modify a trust, courts often look closely at evidence of the settlor’s intent, including amendments, letters, or communications that reflect decisions about distributions and trustee powers. If the settlor is still living, their current wishes may carry significant weight. When the settlor is deceased, courts rely on the record and testimony to determine how closely a proposed modification aligns with the settlor’s documented objectives and the overall purpose of the trust.
The trustee is the individual or entity responsible for managing trust assets and carrying out the terms of the trust for the benefit of the beneficiaries. Trustees have duties of loyalty, prudence, and impartiality which must be considered during any modification proceeding. When a petition proposes to change trustee powers, remove a trustee, or adjust administrative procedures, the court evaluates whether the change promotes proper administration and protects beneficiary interests. Trustees are often required to provide accountings and participate in discovery or hearings related to modification petitions to ensure transparency and compliance with trust terms.
A beneficiary is a person or entity entitled to receive benefits under the terms of a trust, such as income, principal distributions, or other specified rights. Beneficiaries may oppose or support a petition to modify a trust depending on how the proposed changes affect their interests. Courts carefully consider beneficiary rights and the potential impact of any modification on distribution patterns and protections that the trust originally afforded. Proper notice and an opportunity to be heard are essential to protect beneficiary interests during the petition process and to ensure that any court-approved modification is fair and legally sound.
A petition is a formal request filed with the probate court seeking approval for a specific change to a trust or a ruling on a disputed matter. Petitions must include supporting facts, legal grounds, and identification of interested parties. The court uses the petition as the basis for determining whether a modification is appropriate under state law and whether notice and other procedural requirements have been met. The petition typically triggers a period for responses, negotiations, and potentially a hearing, during which the court evaluates evidence and issues an order that resolves the contested issue or approves the requested amendment.
When addressing a trust that may need modification, parties can choose informal negotiation, mediation, or a formal petition to the probate court. Informal agreements can be faster and less costly when beneficiaries and trustees are willing to cooperate, but they may lack the finality or enforcement of a court order. A petition provides a formal resolution with the force of a judicial decree, which can be important when disputes persist or when changes affect third parties. The right approach depends on the level of consensus among interested parties and the complexity of the legal issues involved.
Minor administrative errors or ambiguities in a trust document can often be addressed through agreement among the trustee and beneficiaries without filing a court petition. Examples include correcting typographical mistakes, clarifying ambiguous language, or updating contact information for fiduciaries. These matters can sometimes be resolved with an informal amendment, a memorandum, or an agreement that is documented and executed by the appropriate parties. Using an informal approach can save time and expense, provided all interested parties agree and the change does not alter fundamental distribution provisions or violate statutory protections.
If the settlor is living and retains the power to amend the trust directly, changes can often be made without court involvement by executing a valid amendment in accordance with the trust document’s formalities. This approach enables the settlor to update distributions, trustee designations, or administrative procedures to reflect current circumstances. Ensuring proper execution and documentation is important to prevent future disputes. When the settlor’s mental capacity or consent is in question, it may be prudent to seek a court determination to validate amendments and prevent later challenges from beneficiaries or other interested parties.
When beneficiaries or trustees disagree about the meaning or administration of trust provisions, a formal petition to the probate court may be necessary to obtain a binding resolution. The court can evaluate evidence, interpret ambiguous provisions, and issue orders that settle disputes and define the rights and responsibilities of all parties. This approach is especially helpful when relationships are strained, parties cannot reach a consensus, or when significant assets or long-term administration issues are at stake. A court order reduces the risk of future litigation by providing clear legal authority for the adopted changes.
Complex legal or tax considerations, such as the need to restructure distributions to address tax consequences or to adapt to changes in family circumstances, often warrant a formal petition and careful legal analysis. The probate court’s approval can validate transactions or modifications that have significant fiscal or administrative effect. Where trusts intersect with retirement accounts, life insurance arrangements, or irrevocable provisions, a comprehensive legal strategy helps ensure modifications comply with statutory limits and preserve intended benefits for beneficiaries while managing potential tax exposures and administrative complications.
A comprehensive approach that includes a court-approved modification delivers legal certainty and enforceability, which can protect beneficiaries and trustees from later disputes. Court involvement creates a formal record explaining the reasons for the change and provides a durable resolution that subsequent parties must respect. This approach is particularly useful when changes affect the fundamental distribution plan or when third parties rely on the trust’s terms. For families in Portola Valley, securing court approval can bring peace of mind that the trust will operate under clear, authoritative guidance aligned with the settlor’s goals.
Comprehensive modification often includes detailed drafting, full disclosure to interested parties, and negotiation where feasible, which helps manage expectations and reduce future conflict. The court process provides structured opportunities to present evidence and legal arguments, helping to resolve contested issues fairly. When settled through the court, modifications can also address related matters such as trustee removal, accounting approvals, or changes to administrative powers. This holistic approach seeks durable solutions that reduce the likelihood of repeated litigation and protect trust assets for intended beneficiaries.
A court approved modification provides legal finality and clarity that informal agreements may lack, creating an enforceable order that governs the trust going forward. This finality protects trustees and beneficiaries by reducing ambiguity about rights and obligations and by limiting the grounds for future challenges. For trusts holding significant assets or involving complex distribution schemes, a judicial order can prevent costly disputes and streamline administration. It also offers predictable outcomes for third parties such as financial institutions that rely on court orders when releasing assets or recognizing a trustee’s authority.
A comprehensive petition process includes notice, an opportunity to be heard, and judicial review, all of which help protect beneficiary interests by ensuring changes are transparent and legally justified. By resolving disputes through the court, families can reduce lingering uncertainty and focus on administration rather than prolonged disagreements. In some cases, the process also facilitates mediated resolutions that preserve relationships while obtaining court confirmation. This balanced approach can be particularly valuable in families with blended relationships, special needs concerns, or other complexities that require careful coordination and clear legal authority.
Start by collecting and carefully reviewing the original trust document, any amendments, related estate planning instruments like wills and powers of attorney, and any communications that reflect the settlor’s intent. A detailed review often reveals whether the change sought is administrative, clerical, or substantive, and it helps identify potential objections from beneficiaries. Document review also highlights procedural requirements in the trust for amendments. Taking this step early improves the quality of any petition and reduces the risk of surprises during negotiations or court proceedings.
If a petition becomes necessary, a persuasive factual record is essential. Gather declarations, financial statements, correspondence, and any medical or other records that demonstrate the reasons for the requested modification. Address issues of settlor intent, capacity, and changed circumstances with objective documentation where possible. Well-organized evidence helps the court understand why the change is appropriate and reduces the likelihood of contested testimony. This preparation also enhances prospects for settlement by making positions and supporting facts clear to all parties.
People pursue trust modification petitions for a range of reasons including changes in family structure, errors in the original document, outdated tax planning provisions, or the need to clarify trustee powers. Modifications can address practical issues such as removing a deceased beneficiary, updating distribution mechanisms to reflect modern circumstances, or correcting provisions that produce unintended results. For families in Portola Valley, thoughtful review and timely action can prevent administration complications and align the trust document with current objectives and realities.
Other reasons include adapting trusts for beneficiaries with special needs, adjusting provisions to comply with new laws, or resolving disputes about whether the trustee is fulfilling their duties. In some cases, modifications are sought to consolidate assets, change administrative procedures, or reconcile conflicts between a trust and related documents like retirement plan designations. A formal petition can provide the certainty families need to move forward with confidence and protect assets for intended beneficiaries according to the settlor’s aims.
Circumstances that frequently prompt modification petitions include remarriage, divorce, births or deaths, changes in health or financial position, and shifts in tax law that make existing provisions ineffective. Disputes among beneficiaries or between beneficiaries and trustees also commonly lead to petitions, as do clerical errors or ambiguous language that the parties cannot resolve on their own. Identifying the precise reason for seeking modification helps determine whether an informal amendment, mediated resolution, or court petition is the most appropriate path to address the issue.
Life events such as marriage, divorce, the birth of additional children, or the death of a family member often change the circumstances under which a trust was created. Those changes can alter distribution needs, trustee choices, or the way assets should be allocated. When the original provisions no longer reflect the family’s current situation, a petition can update the trust to better match present intentions while giving all interested parties a chance to respond and to ensure that the modifications comply with applicable California statutes and case law.
Drafting errors and ambiguous clauses in trust documents can lead to disputes about how terms should be interpreted and executed. Such problems can be addressed through a court petition that asks the probate court to interpret language, correct mistakes, or reform the document to reflect the settlor’s intent. The court will review evidence including the document history and any extrinsic evidence permitted by law. Resolving ambiguities through a judicial order helps avoid inconsistent administration and protects fiduciaries who must act in reliance on the trust terms.
Conflicts among beneficiaries or between beneficiaries and trustees about distribution decisions, trustee conduct, or the interpretation of trust provisions often necessitate formal intervention. When parties cannot resolve disputes through communication or mediation, filing a petition brings issues before the court for a binding decision. The court evaluates the factual record and legal arguments and can issue orders to modify the trust, remove or replace trustees, or delineate trustee powers to ensure proper administration and protect beneficiaries’ interests in accordance with the trust’s purpose.
Our Portola Valley trust modification services focus on practical solutions that respect family dynamics and legal requirements. We work with trustees and beneficiaries to assess options, prepare petitions when necessary, and seek resolution through negotiation or court proceedings. We assist with matters such as correcting defective provisions, updating trustee powers, and seeking approval for arrangements that affect distributions or administration. Clients receive clear guidance about procedural steps, likely timelines, and how proposed changes may impact beneficiary rights under California law.
Clients choose the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman for trust modification matters because we emphasize careful preparation, clear communication, and practical strategies that address both legal and family considerations. We focus on thorough document review and factual development to support petitions or negotiations and aim to minimize conflict while protecting client interests. Serving Portola Valley and the broader San Mateo County area, we provide responsive service and help clients understand the implications of potential changes before moving forward with formal court action.
We assist with drafting petitions, preparing supporting declarations, coordinating notices to interested parties, and representing clients at hearings when necessary. Our approach considers alternatives to litigation, including mediation and settlement, while ensuring that any agreement or court order addresses the long term administration of the trust. Clients appreciate our attention to detail, timely communication, and focus on achieving legally sound outcomes that reduce the likelihood of later disputes and support efficient trust administration.
When clients contact our office, we start by gathering relevant documents and assessing goals, risks, and potential remedies. Whether a matter can be resolved through agreement or requires a formal petition, we provide clear options and next steps so clients can make informed decisions. Our representation seeks to balance legal considerations, cost efficiency, and preservation of family relationships, offering realistic guidance tailored to the circumstances of each case in Portola Valley and throughout San Mateo County.
Our process begins with a focused intake to identify the trust documents, the settlor’s situation, and the interests of trustees and beneficiaries. We then evaluate whether an informal resolution is feasible or if a court petition is the appropriate course. When preparing a petition, we assemble supporting evidence, draft clear legal arguments, and ensure procedural compliance for notice and filings in San Mateo County. If the matter proceeds to hearing, we present a well-organized case to the court and pursue settlement where it serves our client’s objectives.
The first step involves a thorough review of the trust, amendments, related estate planning documents, and any correspondence relevant to the settlor’s intent. We identify potential legal issues, assess the strength of proposed modifications, and outline procedural requirements such as notices and service. This assessment helps determine whether negotiation, mediation, or a formal petition best suits the circumstances. We also advise clients about likely timelines and costs so they can make informed choices about moving forward.
Collecting a complete set of trust documents, amendments, beneficiary designations, and financial records is essential to build a persuasive case. We help clients identify where assets are titled, locate original trust instruments, and compile any correspondence or evidence reflecting the settlor’s intentions. Medical records or declarations may be necessary when capacity or undue influence is at issue. Organizing this material early improves the clarity of a petition and helps identify opportunities for informal resolution or the need for court intervention.
Properly identifying and providing notice to interested parties is a procedural requirement that can affect the validity of any court action. We research and list beneficiaries, contingent beneficiaries, and other persons with potential interests, and we ensure compliance with local rules for service and filing. Adequate notice promotes fairness, reduces grounds for later objections based on lack of notice, and allows all relevant parties to participate in negotiations or hearings. Clear record keeping of notice efforts is maintained throughout the process.
If a petition is necessary, we draft a targeted petition that clearly states the requested modification, the legal basis for relief, and the supporting facts. The petition includes declarations and exhibits that document the need for the change, and complies with local filing requirements in the probate court. We coordinate service on all interested parties and respond to any initial challenges or requests for additional information. Thoughtful drafting and accurate supporting evidence improve the chance of a favorable resolution, whether by court order or negotiated settlement.
Supporting declarations and exhibits are often the most important components of a petition, presenting factual narratives and documentary proof that justify the requested modification. We assist in preparing declarations from trustees, beneficiaries, or professionals who can attest to relevant circumstances, and we attach financial records, correspondence, and certified documents as exhibits. A clear and persuasive factual presentation helps the court understand the context and necessity for change, and it also facilitates meaningful settlement discussions among the parties.
After filing the petition, we ensure that all required notices are served according to probate procedures and track any responses or objections from interested parties. We address preliminary procedural matters and, where appropriate, engage in settlement negotiations to resolve disputes without contested hearings. If objections arise, we prepare responsive pleadings and evidence to counter opposing arguments. Managing responses promptly and professionally helps keep the case focused and positions our clients for either negotiated resolution or success at a hearing.
The final stage may involve a court hearing where evidence is presented and the judge decides whether to approve the modification. Alternatively, parties may reach a settlement that is presented to the court for approval, producing an enforceable order. We represent clients during hearings, advocate for their positions, and work toward practical resolutions that meet the settlor’s intent and the beneficiaries’ needs. Once the court issues an order, we assist with implementing changes to trustee powers, asset titles, and administrative procedures to reflect the modification.
At a hearing, the court evaluates evidence and testimony to determine whether the proposed modification should be approved. We prepare witnesses, organize exhibits, and present arguments that explain why the change aligns with the trust’s purpose and applicable law. When settlement is possible, we negotiate terms that address the main concerns of the parties and then provide the court with a stipulated order for approval. Both paths require disciplined preparation to ensure the final outcome is clear, enforceable, and administratively workable.
After a court approves a modification, it is important to implement the order correctly by updating trust records, retitling assets if necessary, and notifying financial institutions and other relevant parties. Trustees must follow any revised distribution instructions and administrative powers set by the order. We guide clients through these steps to ensure compliance and help prevent future disputes. Proper implementation consolidates the benefits of the order and supports ongoing trust administration consistent with the settlor’s updated direction.
A trust modification petition is a formal request filed with the probate court seeking approval to alter the terms or administration of an existing trust. The petition sets out the proposed change, factual support for why the change is appropriate, and identification of interested parties. Courts consider petitions when parties cannot reach agreement informally or when changes affect important rights or administrative structures that warrant judicial review. In California, interested parties such as trustees, beneficiaries, or successor trustees may file or be the subject of a petition depending on the relief sought. The court will require proper notice to all interested persons and evaluate the petition based on evidence, the settlor’s intent, and applicable statutory or case law. A qualified review of the trust and situation helps determine who should file and what relief to request.
The timeline for a trust modification petition varies depending on complexity, the level of dispute among parties, and local court schedules. Simple, uncontested matters may proceed relatively quickly, sometimes within a few months, while contested petitions that require discovery and hearings can take significantly longer. Factors such as the need for expert testimony, the volume of evidence, and the court’s calendar all influence timing. Parties who pursue negotiation or mediation may shorten the overall timeline by avoiding contested hearings. Early and thorough preparation of documents and supporting evidence also helps move a matter efficiently. Consulting with counsel early allows you to anticipate likely timing and prepare for potential delays inherent in contested proceedings.
Yes, a trust can be modified after the settlor has passed away under certain circumstances. California law permits petitions to reform or modify trusts to correct mistakes, reflect the settlor’s probable intent, or address changed circumstances that make the original terms impracticable. The court will examine evidence about the settlor’s intent and the factual basis for the requested modification to determine whether judicial relief is appropriate. Postmortem modifications typically require a showing that the change is consistent with the settlor’s objectives or necessary to carry out the trust’s purpose. Because the settlor cannot personally approve changes after death, courts carefully weigh documentary evidence, course of conduct, and other supporting materials when evaluating such petitions to ensure that beneficiary rights and statutory protections are respected.
A trust modification can affect beneficiaries by altering distribution timing, amounts, or conditions. Because beneficiaries have a legal interest in the trust, courts require notice to ensure they have the opportunity to object or support the proposed change. Notice procedures vary depending on the nature of the petition and the individuals involved, but providing clear and timely notice is essential to protect their rights and to validate the court’s eventual order. Beneficiaries who receive notice can file responses or participate in settlement discussions. When a petition is resolved by agreement or court order, beneficiaries’ rights and new expectations are documented, which reduces the risk of future disputes. Open communication and formal notice help maintain transparency and fairness throughout the modification process.
Courts consider a range of evidence when deciding a trust modification petition, including the trust instrument and any amendments, correspondence that reflects the settlor’s intent, financial records, and declarations from trustees or beneficiaries. Where questions of capacity or undue influence arise, medical records, witness declarations, or expert testimony addressing the settlor’s condition at relevant times may be considered by the court. The weight given to each item depends on the legal issue presented and evidentiary rules. Documentary evidence that demonstrates consistent intent, patterns of conduct, or contemporaneous statements by the settlor can be particularly persuasive. Thorough preparation of exhibits and supporting declarations improves the clarity of the petition and assists the court in determining whether the requested modification is appropriate and legally sound.
Alternatives to filing a petition include negotiating a settlement with other interested parties, using mediation to resolve disputes, or, when the settlor is living, having the settlor execute a valid amendment if permitted by the trust. These alternatives can be faster and less expensive than contested litigation and may preserve family relationships better than a protracted court battle. Informal resolutions are a practical choice when parties are willing to cooperate and the changes do not require judicial validation to be effective. However, when agreement cannot be reached or when parties seek the enforceability and finality that a court order provides, a petition remains the appropriate option. Counsel can help evaluate whether informal methods are feasible and, if not, prepare a petition that addresses the necessary legal and procedural safeguards for court review.
Common outcomes after a trust modification petition include court approval of the requested changes, denial of the petition, or a negotiated settlement presented to the court for approval. If the court approves the modification, it issues an order that becomes part of the official record and governs the trust going forward. The court may also grant partial relief or require specific conditions to be met before finalizing changes. When a petition results in approval, implementation steps such as updating asset titles, adjusting distribution procedures, and notifying financial institutions will follow. If the petition is denied, interested parties may evaluate appeal rights or consider alternative settlement options. The court’s decision aims to balance the settlor’s intent with beneficiary protections and proper trust administration.
Yes, removal of a trustee can be sought through the modification or related petitions when there is evidence that the trustee has breached fiduciary duties, is incapacitated, or otherwise fails to perform necessary functions. The court evaluates whether removal is warranted based on conduct, conflicts of interest, or the trustee’s inability to fulfill duties. Removing a trustee is a significant action, and courts generally require clear factual support before ordering removal and appointing a successor trustee. When removal is pursued, the petition should propose a successor trustee and provide a plan for transitioning asset management and distributions. Ensuring a smooth handoff and documenting the reasons for removal helps the court safeguard beneficiary interests and maintain continuity in trust administration following any change in trusteeship.
Disputes about settlor capacity or undue influence are handled through evidentiary proceedings where the court considers medical records, witness testimony, and documentary evidence. Courts evaluate whether the settlor had the mental capacity to understand the nature and consequences of the trust transaction and whether any improper pressure or influence led to changes that do not reflect the settlor’s true intent. These matters often involve detailed factual inquiries and sometimes expert testimony regarding medical conditions or cognitive function. Because capacity and undue influence claims can be contested and sensitive, careful evidence gathering and legal argumentation are essential. Courts weigh the credibility and timing of evidence, and a well-prepared factual record increases the likelihood of a fair resolution that protects the settlor’s authentic intentions and beneficiary rights.
For an initial consultation about a trust modification, bring the trust document and any amendments, related estate planning instruments such as wills and powers of attorney, recent account statements for trust assets, and correspondence or records relevant to the issue. If there are medical concerns, bringing relevant medical records or information about providers can be helpful. The more documentation available, the better counsel can evaluate options and formulate a strategy. Be prepared to explain the reason for seeking modification, the identities of trustees and beneficiaries, and any history of disagreements or communications that bear on the matter. This background helps identify whether negotiation, mediation, or a formal petition is most likely to meet your goals and allows counsel to outline likely timelines, procedural steps, and potential outcomes.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas