If a trust was intended to hold real property but the title was never transferred into the trust, a Heggstad petition can help confirm that property belongs to the trust. The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman assist San Bruno and surrounding communities with Heggstad petitions tied to estate plans that include revocable living trusts and pour-over wills. Our approach begins with a careful review of trust documents, deeds, and probate history to evaluate whether a court declaration is likely to be granted. We focus on practical steps to preserve family property rights while minimizing time and cost for beneficiaries and trustees in a clear, communicative process.
A successful Heggstad petition often prevents the need for formal probate and resolves title issues that arise when trust funding was incomplete. We explain how a Heggstad petition works under California law and what evidence helps support a judicial determination that property should be treated as trust property. Clients receive guidance on assembling deeds, affidavits, and trust certifications such as a Certification of Trust or General Assignment of Assets to Trust. Clear planning and timely action can smooth transitions for beneficiaries, avoid future disputes, and protect long-term asset management within the framework of the trust.
A Heggstad petition offers a legal pathway to clarify ownership for property that was always intended to be held in trust but was never formally retitled. This remedy can preserve the settlor’s intent, maintain continuity of management for real property, and avoid the delays and publicity of probate. For families in San Bruno, resolving title issues through a Heggstad petition can safeguard trust assets for future generations, maintain privacy, and reduce administrative costs compared with probate proceedings. Developing a clear record demonstrating the settlor’s intent and supporting documentation increases the likelihood of an efficient judicial determination that the property belongs to the trust.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provide estate planning and trust administration services to clients throughout San Bruno and San Mateo County. Our practice addresses common trust administration challenges such as incomplete trust funding, Heggstad petitions, trust modification petitions, and pour-over wills. We collaborate with clients to assemble deeds, trusts like revocable living trusts and irrevocable life insurance trusts, and related documents such as financial powers of attorney and advance health care directives. Our focus is on clear communication, careful document review, and actionable strategies that reduce the likelihood of future disputes and promote orderly transfer of assets according to the settlor’s intent.
A Heggstad petition is a judicial request to treat property as if it had been transferred into a trust when the intent to fund the trust is evident despite missing title documents. This process is often used when a settlor prepared a revocable living trust but omitted retitling a deed into the trust prior to death or incapacity. The petition requires clear demonstration of the settlor’s intent, relevant trust provisions, and supporting evidence such as a pour-over will, deed drafts, or contemporaneous statements. The court evaluates whether treating the property as trust property honors the settlor’s plan while protecting third parties and creditors under California trust law.
Filing a Heggstad petition involves compiling documentary evidence and preparing declarations that establish the chain of events leading to incomplete funding. Common supporting materials include the trust instrument, a draft or record of the intended deed, a Certification of Trust, and affidavits from trustees or witnesses. The petition seeks a judicial declaration that the property is part of the trust so trustees can manage or transfer it according to the trust’s terms. Timely action can prevent title disputes, reduce the need for probate, and help beneficiaries receive their intended inheritances with greater certainty.
A Heggstad petition is named after a California case that clarified when a court may recognize property as belonging to a trust despite imperfect title transfer. The petition asks the superior court to declare that specific property should be treated as trust property because the settlor intended it to be part of the trust estate. Key elements include the trust instrument showing the intended disposition of property, evidence of attempts or intent to transfer title, and factors showing that third parties are not prejudiced. The remedy helps bridge administrative oversights while respecting the settlor’s testamentary plan within California probate and trust procedures.
A successful Heggstad petition typically requires assembling a clear factual record, drafting a petition and supporting declarations, notifying interested parties, and working with the court to obtain a declaratory judgment. Important elements include the original trust document, any drafts or communications reflecting intent to fund the trust, deeds or escrow instructions, and a Certification of Trust when necessary. The process may involve informal resolution with title companies or filing a petition to ensure the title is corrected. Effective preparation reduces delays and helps trustees and beneficiaries proceed with trust administration and property transfers in accordance with the settlor’s wishes.
Understanding common terms helps clients navigate Heggstad petitions and related estate planning matters. This glossary covers trust, beneficiary, trustee, deed, funding, pour-over will, Certification of Trust, and other relevant terms. Clear definitions make it easier to gather the necessary documents and understand the obligations and rights of parties involved. Familiarity with these terms helps trustees and beneficiaries communicate effectively, compile evidence, and follow the procedural steps required for a successful petition under California law, reducing confusion during trust administration and potential court proceedings.
A revocable living trust is a living trust that the settlor can modify or revoke during their lifetime and that directs the management and distribution of assets either during incapacity or after death. The trust typically names a successor trustee and beneficiaries and can include provisions for property management and distribution sequences. Funding the trust means transferring asset titles or beneficiary designations into the trust. Proper funding is essential to avoid probate; when funding is incomplete, a Heggstad petition may be used to resolve property intended for the trust that was not formally retitled.
A pour-over will is a testamentary document that directs that any property not already placed in a trust at the time of death should be transferred into the settlor’s trust. While it ensures decedent property eventually moves into the trust, a pour-over will does not avoid probate for assets that were not funded into the trust during the settlor’s life. Evidence of a pour-over will can support a Heggstad petition by demonstrating the settlor’s intent to include certain assets in the trust, and helps the court understand the overall estate plan and intended distributions.
A Certification of Trust is a concise document that verifies the existence and key terms of a trust without revealing its full contents. It is often used to satisfy third parties such as title companies, banks, or real estate agents who need assurance that the trustees have authority to act. A Certification of Trust can accompany a Heggstad petition or other trust administration tasks to prove that a trust exists and who the trustees are, supporting actions to transfer or manage trust property while preserving the privacy of the trust instrument itself.
A Heggstad petition is a court action in California seeking a judicial declaration that particular property should be treated as trust property despite a defective or missing title transfer. The petition relies on evidence that the settlor intended the property to be included in the trust, and it assists trustees in resolving ownership for administration or transfer purposes. This remedy is particularly useful when avoiding formal probate is in the beneficiaries’ interest and when documentary proof supports the settlor’s expressed intent regarding the property.
When property intended for a trust lacks proper title, several options may be available: informal title corrections, Heggstad petitions, or full probate administration. Informal title correction may work when all parties and a title company agree, but this is not always possible. A Heggstad petition seeks judicial recognition to avoid probate and restore trust control. Probate administers estate assets through court supervision and may be necessary where other remedies fail or when a pour-over will must be processed. The right choice depends on factors such as documentation, creditor rights, and the complexity of beneficiaries and ownership claims.
An informal approach can be suitable when title problems are minor and all interested parties agree about the settlor’s intent. Situations that support a limited correction include clear deeds or escrow instructions showing the intent to fund a trust, cooperative beneficiaries, and no creditor disputes. In these circumstances, a title company may accept a Certification of Trust and updated deed, allowing record correction without court involvement. This path tends to be faster and less expensive, but it requires unanimous cooperation and convincing documentation that a court would later recognize as demonstrating the settlor’s intent.
A limited approach may be feasible when banks, title companies, or other third parties accept trust certifications and supporting affidavits that demonstrate trustee authority. Cooperation from these entities can streamline the process of transferring assets into the trust without a court ruling. That said, when third parties decline to act due to uncertainty or concerns about liability, filing a Heggstad petition provides a formal legal resolution. Assessing cooperation early helps determine whether an informal correction is realistic or whether formal court action will be more reliable to protect the trust’s interests.
A comprehensive legal approach is warranted when title issues involve competing claims, undocumented transfers, or creditor concerns that could complicate trust administration. In such cases the formal process of a Heggstad petition provides judicial clarity that helps protect trustees and beneficiaries from future disputes. Preparing a full evidentiary record, addressing potential objections, and coordinating required notices to interested parties reduces the chance of later litigation. This careful approach helps preserve the settlor’s intent while safeguarding the property from unforeseen claims that might otherwise lead to protracted legal battles.
When clients want to minimize the likelihood of future challenges to ownership or distribution, pursuing a formal judicial declaration through a Heggstad petition creates a clear legal record. This is important for properties with significant value, multiple beneficiaries, or when the settlor’s actions are not fully documented. A formal ruling reduces ambiguity, provides enforceable authority for trustees, and supports title transfer to buyers or successors with confidence. Investing in a thorough process upfront can avoid additional expenses and uncertainty later for heirs, trustees, and title insurers.
A comprehensive approach to a Heggstad petition secures a judicial declaration that clarifies ownership and supports trust administration without the need for full probate. That declaration helps trustees manage, sell, or transfer property according to the trust terms, reducing the risk of future disputes. The process also creates a documented court record that title companies and financial institutions will accept, smoothing transactions and protecting beneficiaries’ interests. Clarity from the bench can prevent delays in settlement and provide peace of mind that assets will be handled as the settlor intended.
Pursuing a formal petition also helps address creditor or lien issues and ensures proper notice to interested parties, which can limit later claims against trust property. A well-prepared petition can include supporting affidavits, copies of trust instruments such as revocable living trusts and irrevocable life insurance trusts, and any relevant communications indicating intent. This holistic documentation reduces the chance that title issues will derail transactions or create administrative burdens for trustees, preserving family assets and promoting orderly administration consistent with the trust instrument.
One key benefit of a judicial declaration is obtaining clear, marketable title that buyers, lenders, and title insurers will accept. When a court rules that property belongs to the trust, trustees can proceed with sales or refinancing with reduced risk of title defects or future contestation. This certainty benefits beneficiaries who may need to liquidate assets or transfer ownership as part of the trust’s distribution plan. By securing a declaratory judgment, trustees create a robust basis for transactional actions and reduce obstacles that might otherwise prevent timely resolution of trust matters.
A formal court decision addressing ownership reduces ambiguity that often leads to later litigation among heirs or creditors. When a Heggstad petition is supported by a comprehensive record and appropriate notices, remaining disputes are less likely to arise because the court’s ruling provides an authoritative resolution. This saves time and expense for trustees and beneficiaries who otherwise might face contested proceedings. Establishing a clear legal foundation for trust ownership fosters smoother administration and provides greater assurance that the settlor’s directions will be carried out without repeated legal challenges.
Gathering complete documentation is essential when preparing a Heggstad petition. Begin by locating the trust instrument, deeds, any draft deeds, the pour-over will, and related trust documents like Certifications of Trust or General Assignment of Assets to Trust. Affidavits or statements from the settlor or witnesses that reflect the intent to fund the trust can be highly persuasive. Early collection reduces delays and helps identify gaps that may require additional affidavits or declarations. Prepared documentation supports efficient petition drafting and increases the likelihood of a favorable court declaration.
Evidence showing the settlor’s intent to include property in the trust is central to a Heggstad petition. Keep records such as correspondence, draft deeds, escrow instructions, bank records showing payments toward purchase under trust planning, and witness statements that reflect the settlor’s plans. Even contemporaneous notes or estate planning summaries prepared when the trust was created may support the court’s understanding of intent. Preserving and organizing this evidence improves the ability to present a persuasive case and reduces the risk that the court will require a more extensive factual hearing.
Consider a Heggstad petition if property intended for a trust was never formally retitled, if a transfer failed at escrow, or if heirs are facing delays due to title defects. The petition can provide a judicial declaration that treats the property as trust assets, enabling trustees to manage or distribute the property according to the trust terms rather than through probate. This approach helps protect privacy, reduce administrative costs, and maintain continuity in asset management. Taking timely steps to resolve title defects preserves the settlor’s intentions and assists beneficiaries in receiving their inheritances as planned.
Another reason to pursue a Heggstad petition is to ensure marketability of title for sale or refinancing. Lenders and buyers often require clear title documentation; a court declaration confirming trust ownership can satisfy these requirements. Additionally, a Heggstad petition can clarify trustee authority where institutions are reluctant to accept trustee actions without a formal court ruling. For families navigating property division, creditor matters, or estate settlement tasks, a judicial declaration can provide the certainty needed to move forward with confidence and reduced risk of later disputes.
Typical circumstances prompting a Heggstad petition include a deceased settlor who prepared a revocable living trust but did not transfer a deed before death, property purchased with the intent to be held in trust but recorded in the settlor’s name, or title problems discovered during a planned sale or refinance. Other scenarios include failure to update beneficiary designations, transfers that did not complete, and disputes among heirs about the settlor’s intent. Identifying these situations early allows trustees and beneficiaries to seek the appropriate remedy and preserve trust objectives.
When a deed remains recorded only in the settlor’s name after the settlor’s death, the property may be subject to probate rather than trust distribution. A Heggstad petition seeks a judicial finding that the property was intended to be part of the trust, allowing trustees to administer it without probate. Documentation such as the trust instrument, purchase records, and statements from those involved in the transfer process can support the petition. Resolving the issue through court declaration preserves the settlor’s plan and simplifies administration for trustees and beneficiaries.
Title companies or lenders may refuse to recognize trustee authority when documentation is incomplete or when the deed was not retitled. In these cases, attempts to resolve the matter directly can fail, prompting the need for a Heggstad petition to obtain a formal ruling. The petition creates a court record that satisfies institutional requirements, enabling sales, refinancing, or other transactions. Preparing clear supporting evidence and addressing potential objections helps secure the declaration needed to move forward with confidence and avoid prolonged delays.
When heirs dispute whether property was intended to be in the trust, a Heggstad petition can clarify ownership and minimize prolonged conflict. The court examines evidence of the settlor’s intent and will issue an order that resolves the contested claim, allowing trustees to carry out trust terms. This process reduces uncertainty and helps ensure that distributions follow the settlor’s wishes. Engaging in a formal proceeding protects trustees acting in good faith and prevents future contests that could otherwise jeopardize family assets and create added expense and delay.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman serve San Bruno, San Mateo County, and nearby communities to address trust funding issues and Heggstad petitions. We guide clients through document collection, title inquiries, and, when necessary, the preparation and filing of petitions that seek judicial declarations. Our local knowledge of county recording practices and probate procedures supports effective case preparation. Clients benefit from clear communication about timelines, possible outcomes, and the documentation needed to pursue the most appropriate remedy for correcting title or confirming trust ownership.
Clients turn to the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman for focused guidance on trust funding problems and Heggstad petitions because we prioritize careful review of trust instruments and property records to develop pragmatic solutions. We help gather deeds, Certifications of Trust, pour-over wills, and other records needed to support a petition or to attempt informal correction. The objective assessment of options allows trustees and beneficiaries to choose a path that balances cost, timing, and legal certainty in accordance with the settlor’s intentions and California law.
Our practice emphasizes clear communication throughout the process of assembling facts, responding to title company questions, and preparing court filings when necessary. We provide realistic guidance about potential outcomes, including whether an informal title correction is viable or whether a petition is preferable. By preparing detailed declarations and coordinating notice to interested parties, we work to reduce the risk of future disputes and help trustees proceed with confidence in managing or transferring trust property as intended.
We also assist with related estate planning documents that often appear in Heggstad matters, such as revocable living trusts, pour-over wills, financial powers of attorney, advance health care directives, and Certifications of Trust. This integrated approach helps families address gaps that may have contributed to incomplete funding, and to implement practical solutions that prevent similar issues in the future. Comprehensive planning and responsive legal support aim to protect assets and ensure orderly trust administration.
Our process for Heggstad petitions begins with a thorough intake and document review to determine the strength of the record showing intent to fund the trust. We then attempt informal resolution when practical by communicating with title companies and affected parties. If formal relief is required, we prepare a petition and supporting declarations, file the case, and ensure proper notice. Throughout the process we keep trustees and beneficiaries informed, work to minimize delays, and coordinate with title professionals and courts to secure a clear outcome that supports trust administration and property disposition.
The first step is collecting and reviewing all relevant documents, including the trust instrument, deeds, escrow records, and any evidence of intent to transfer property into the trust. This review identifies gaps and determines whether a title company will accept trust certifications or whether a formal petition is necessary. We obtain copies of recorded instruments and, when appropriate, declarations from witnesses who can describe the settlor’s intent. A complete factual record streamlines subsequent steps and helps shape the petition strategy.
Collecting the trust instrument, Certification of Trust, current deeds, and any draft conveyances is essential for establishing the settlor’s intent. We also look for related estate planning documents such as pour-over wills and powers of attorney that corroborate the trust plan. These materials show the court the trust’s terms and provide support for treating the property as trust assets. Organizing documents early reduces surprises and helps establish a clear factual basis for a petition or for informal corrections with title companies.
Interviewing trustees, family members, escrow officers, and others involved in the original transaction can yield statements that demonstrate the settlor’s intent. Affidavits or declarations from these witnesses often strengthen the factual record required by the court. Detailed witness accounts describing conversations, drafts, and efforts to retitle property provide context that written instruments alone may not capture. These recollections are documented and incorporated into declarations that accompany the petition to create a persuasive narrative for the court.
After assembling documents and witness statements, we first explore whether title companies or institutions will accept a Certification of Trust and related affidavits to correct title without court involvement. If third parties decline to proceed, we draft and file a Heggstad petition supported by the factual record. The petition outlines the facts, legal basis, and requested declaration. We also coordinate proper notice to interested parties, including beneficiaries and creditors, to comply with court procedures and reduce the likelihood of procedural challenges.
Coordinating with title insurers and lenders can sometimes resolve title defects quickly when they accept a Certification of Trust and supporting documentation. We present the assembled evidence and address any inquiries to bridge institutional concerns. When this succeeds, the deed can be corrected without litigation. When institutions refuse, the recorded responses and their reasons become part of the factual record supporting a petition. Clear documentation of these efforts strengthens the case for judicial intervention if needed.
If informal measures fail, we prepare the formal petition seeking a court declaration that the property is trust property. The petition includes the trust instrument, deeds, witness declarations, and any correspondence with title companies. We file the petition in the appropriate superior court and arrange service on interested parties in compliance with California rules. The thorough preparation of the petition and supporting exhibits positions the case for an efficient resolution while providing the court with a complete record of the settlor’s intent.
Once a petition is filed, the court will review the record and schedule proceedings as required. We respond to any objections, present declarations, and, when necessary, appear at hearings to present the legal basis for declaring the property part of the trust. The court may issue a declaratory judgment or order that corrects title and clarifies trustee authority. After the order is entered, we coordinate with the county recorder and title companies to ensure deeds and records reflect the court’s ruling and to complete any transfer or sale transactions.
During the court phase we address objections by interested parties and submit declarations and documentary evidence to support the petition. Clear presentation of the settlor’s intent, the trust’s provisions, and the chain of events leading to incomplete funding is essential. We prepare the record carefully to minimize the need for extended litigation and to facilitate a prompt ruling. By anticipating likely objections and presenting organized evidence, trustees improve their chances of obtaining a favorable order without protracted disputes.
After the court issues an order declaring the property as trust property, we assist with recording the court order and updating deeds or title records as necessary. This step ensures that the title reflects the court’s ruling and that the trustee can manage or transfer the property according to the trust terms. We coordinate with county recorder offices and title companies to implement the order, provide documentation to lenders if needed, and ensure that subsequent transactions proceed smoothly with marketable title and clear documentation of trustee authority.
A Heggstad petition is a court filing that asks a California superior court to declare that specific property should be treated as trust property despite a defective or missing title transfer. It is commonly used when a settlor created a revocable living trust but failed to retitle real property into the trust before death or incapacity. The petition focuses on demonstrating the settlor’s intent and producing supporting documentation such as the trust instrument, deeds, and witness declarations. The petition is intended to provide a judicial declaration that allows trustees to administer or transfer property according to the trust terms rather than through probate. When successful, the ruling assists trustees and title companies in accepting the property as belonging to the trust, which facilitates sales, refinancing, or distribution to beneficiaries while reducing future ownership disputes.
Timing for a Heggstad petition can vary depending on case complexity, court schedules, and whether objections arise. In uncomplicated matters with cooperative interested parties, the process may move more quickly because the court can review a well-documented petition and issue a declaratory order without extended hearings. Gathering evidence and preparing detailed declarations are important initial steps that affect timing. When objections are filed or further factual development is required, the process can extend over several months. Coordination with title companies and proper service on interested parties also contributes to the timeline. Early document assembly and clear communication with involved parties can help streamline the process and reduce delays associated with additional discovery or contested hearings.
Evidence that supports a Heggstad petition typically includes the trust instrument, any draft or intended deeds, the pour-over will, escrow records, and declarations from witnesses who can attest to the settlor’s intent to place property in the trust. A Certification of Trust can help demonstrate the trust’s existence and the identity of trustees without revealing confidential details. Detailed contemporaneous records or correspondence showing the settlor’s plans are also valuable. Affidavits from trustees, family members, escrow officers, or attorneys involved in the transaction can strengthen the factual narrative. Documentation of attempts to retitle the property or communications with title companies showing reluctance to record a trust deed can further support the petition. A complete factual record reduces the need for extended litigation and enhances the petition’s persuasiveness.
A Heggstad petition can prevent the need for full probate for the specific property at issue when the court declares the property part of the trust, allowing trustees to administer or distribute it under the trust’s terms. This outcome preserves privacy and can reduce administrative costs compared with probate for that property. However, the petition applies to the particular assets addressed and does not automatically resolve unrelated estate administration matters that may still require probate or other proceedings. If other assets or claims require probate oversight, those matters may proceed separately. The Heggstad petition is most effective when focused on specific title defects and supported by a clear record of the settlor’s intent. When in doubt, reviewing the overall estate plan and discussing whether additional estate administration steps are necessary helps determine the comprehensive approach needed.
Creditors’ rights are an important consideration when filing a Heggstad petition. The court process includes providing notice to interested parties and potential creditors as required by procedural rules. If creditors have valid claims, the petition does not extinguish their rights; it clarifies ownership for trust administration while preserving lawful creditor remedies. Proper notice and timing help ensure that creditor interests are addressed in accordance with California law. When a property is declared part of a trust, trustees still must consider outstanding liens or recorded claims that affect title. The petition does not eliminate recorded encumbrances, and trustees may need to address liens or negotiate resolutions before transferring or selling the property. A careful review of title and creditor issues precedes final actions on the property.
Costs for a Heggstad petition vary based on factors like case complexity, the need for extensive documentary assembly, and whether the matter is contested. Typical expenses include filing fees, costs for serving interested parties, title searches, and legal fees for preparing the petition and supporting declarations. When matters are straightforward and uncontested, overall costs tend to be lower because fewer court appearances and less discovery are required. Contested cases or those requiring additional evidence and hearings will increase costs due to additional attorney time, possible expert testimony, and extended court involvement. Exploring informal resolution options with title companies first can sometimes limit expenses, and early documentation reduces the likelihood of costly litigation.
A Heggstad petition can be used for both residential and commercial property when the facts show the settlor intended the property to be held in trust. The key issue is demonstrating the intent to transfer the property into the trust and presenting supporting documentation. Whether the property is a family home or commercial real estate, similar evidentiary considerations apply, including deeds, escrow records, trust provisions, and witness declarations. Complex commercial transactions may involve additional title encumbrances, lenders, or contractual obligations that require careful review. In such cases, coordinating with title companies, lenders, and counsel experienced in commercial real estate matters is helpful to ensure that the petition addresses all relevant concerns and secures a clear outcome acceptable to transactional parties.
Yes. Proper notice to beneficiaries and other interested parties is typically required when filing a Heggstad petition. California procedural rules mandate service and notice so that parties who might be affected by the court’s declaration have an opportunity to review and object. This step protects the rights of beneficiaries, creditors, and other interested individuals, and helps ensure that the court’s order will be enforceable and defensible. Providing clear notice also reduces the likelihood of surprise objections later. Sufficient service records and documentation of notice proceedings are included in the court file, and the petition process accounts for reasonable time periods for responses or objections. Timely and accurate notice supports an orderly resolution of title issues.
If an interested party objects to the petition, the court will consider the objection and may schedule a hearing to resolve factual disputes or address legal issues. Objecting parties can present evidence or challenge the sufficiency of the record demonstrating the settlor’s intent. Responding to objections often requires supplemental declarations, documentary proof, or deposition testimony to address contested points and clarify the chain of events concerning title and trust funding. Resolving objections may extend the timeline and increase the complexity of the proceeding, but a well-prepared petition with comprehensive supporting materials reduces the likelihood of successful challenges. In some cases, mediation or negotiated settlements among parties can resolve disputes without prolonged litigation, allowing the court to enter an agreed order that accomplishes the petition’s objectives.
To begin resolving a title issue, start by gathering all trust documents, deeds, escrow records, and any correspondence or drafts related to the intended transfer. Identifying witnesses who can confirm the settlor’s intent is also helpful. With this initial information, schedule a consultation to review the facts and determine whether informal correction is possible or whether a Heggstad petition is advisable based on the strength of the documentation and the position of title companies or lenders. Early action to compile records and communicate with involved parties is beneficial. A thorough initial review clarifies options and helps prioritize steps such as requesting a Certification of Trust, contacting title insurers, or preparing a petition. Prompt attention reduces the risk of delays that can complicate administration and supports a more efficient resolution.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas