A Heggstad petition is a legal procedure used in California to place real property into a trust when the transfer was intended but not completed at the time of a decedent’s death. The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman assist San Carlos residents with evaluating whether a Heggstad petition is appropriate, preparing the necessary filings, and working with the probate court to establish that the deceased intended the transfer. This avoids unnecessary probate delays and helps preserve the trust terms. Our approach focuses on careful document review, clear communication with family members and fiduciaries, and efficient court presentation to achieve an orderly transfer of title when warranted.
Many families discover after a loved one’s death that a property intended to fund a trust was never formally transferred. A Heggstad petition can resolve this by asking the court to recognize that the decedent intended the property to be held in trust. In San Carlos and across San Mateo County, this process can prevent full probate and align asset distribution with the decedent’s estate plan. We help clients collect evidence of intent, draft pleadings, coordinate with trustees and beneficiaries, and advocate in court. The goal is to restore the estate plan’s original design while minimizing delay, cost, and family conflict where possible.
Filing a Heggstad petition can be the key step to honoring a decedent’s plan when property was never formally conveyed into a living trust. The petition asks the court to declare that real property belongs to the trust, avoiding the need for full probate administration. This can save time and reduce expenses for trustees and beneficiaries while keeping the estate administration consistent with the trust terms. Preparing a successful petition requires organized documentation, credible testimony or declarations regarding intent, and an understanding of local court procedures. For San Carlos families, this remedy often provides a practical pathway to carry out the decedent’s wishes efficiently and with legal certainty.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provides estate planning and trust administration services to clients across San Mateo County, including San Carlos. Our practice assists with trust funding issues, Heggstad petitions, trust administration matters, and related probate filings. We guide clients through evidence gathering, declaration drafting, and court proceedings when property transfer problems arise after death. Our approach is client-focused, emphasizing clear communication, timely updates, and practical solutions tailored to each family’s circumstances. We also advise on preventing future transfer issues by reviewing estate documents and funding practices so that trusts achieve their intended goals.
A Heggstad petition asks a California probate court to find that a decedent intended real property to be held by a trust, despite the absence of a recorded transfer. This remedy applies when there is credible evidence showing the decedent executed trust documents or otherwise expressed an intention to place the property in trust but failed to complete the formal deed or other recordable step. The petition typically includes affidavits, declarations, trust documents, and other supporting items that demonstrate intent. Courts review this evidence and, if persuaded, will order the property be treated as trust property, allowing trustees to manage or distribute it according to the trust terms.
The evidentiary threshold for a Heggstad petition centers on demonstrating the decedent’s intent by a preponderance of the evidence. This usually involves obtaining declarations from persons with direct knowledge, presenting the trust document, and showing actions taken by the decedent consistent with funding the trust. In San Carlos and throughout California, local rules and judicial preferences may vary, so preparing a clear and well-supported petition tailored to the county’s requirements improves the chance of success. The process can often avoid full probate, preserve privacy, and allow trustees to administer trust assets without unnecessary court-supervised probate proceedings.
A Heggstad petition is a legal filing used to correct an omission in funding a trust by asking a court to recognize title in the trust. It rests on evidence that the decedent intended the property to be trust property, such as signed trust documents, witnesses, or conduct showing intent. The petition explains the omission, attaches supporting materials, and requests an order that the property be treated as belonging to the trust. If granted, the court’s order allows the trustee to manage or distribute the property under the trust, avoiding the need for probate administration of that asset and aligning property ownership with the estate plan.
Filing a Heggstad petition requires assembling several components: the operative trust instrument, evidence of intent such as declarations or communications, property records, and a proposed order for the court. The petition sets out factual background about the decedent, the trust, and the circumstances of the missing transfer. It also addresses notice to heirs and potential adverse parties, and provides legal argument supporting the requested relief. Once filed, the court may set a hearing, consider written objections, and evaluate whether the evidence supports treating the property as trust property. Effective petitions present facts clearly and anticipate likely questions from the court and interested parties.
Understanding the terminology associated with Heggstad petitions can help families and fiduciaries follow the process more confidently. Terms include trust funding, trustee, beneficiary, probate, title transfer, declaration of intent, and order to quiet title in trust. Each of these plays a role in identifying whether a petition is appropriate and what evidence is necessary. Familiarity with these concepts supports better decision making, clearer communications with counsel, and more effective court presentations. Clear definitions make it easier to gather supporting documents and to explain the circumstances that led to an unrecorded transfer.
Trust funding refers to the process of transferring assets into a trust so they are controlled by the trustee according to the trust terms. Funding includes recording deeds for real property, changing account ownership for financial assets, and formally assigning titles where required. When a funding step is missed, the asset may remain titled in the decedent’s name, creating a gap between the estate plan and actual ownership. A Heggstad petition addresses that gap for real property by asking the court to recognize the decedent’s intent to fund the trust despite the missing recorded transfer.
A declaration of intent is a written or testimonial statement indicating the decedent’s desire that certain property be held by the trust. This evidence can include signed documents, correspondence, or sworn statements from witnesses who can attest to the decedent’s plans. When formal transfer steps were not completed, a clear declaration of intent becomes central to a Heggstad petition. The court evaluates these statements alongside other documents to determine whether the property should be treated as trust property, balancing credibility and corroborating evidence.
An order to treat property as a trust asset is the court’s formal declaration that a particular piece of property is to be considered part of a trust despite the absence of a recorded conveyance. Such an order typically follows a successful Heggstad petition and provides the trustee with authority to manage or distribute the property according to the trust. The order resolves title questions, allows transfer of ownership records, and eliminates the need for separate probate administration of that asset. It provides legal clarity to trustees, beneficiaries, and third parties such as title companies or lenders.
Notice and objection refer to the process of informing interested parties about a pending Heggstad petition and allowing them to respond. Parties who may have an interest in the property, including heirs, beneficiaries, or creditors, are typically given notice and an opportunity to file objections. The court will consider any objections when determining whether the evidence supports treating the property as trust property. Proper notice is important to avoid future challenges and to ensure the court’s order is enforceable, and addressing potential objections in advance can streamline the hearing process.
When property meant for a trust is not transferred, families can consider several paths: filing a Heggstad petition, pursuing full probate administration, or negotiating voluntary transfer among heirs and trustees. A Heggstad petition is often the least intrusive route when evidence of intent is strong, because it allows the court to recognize trust ownership without opening full probate for the entire estate. Probate may be necessary when title disputes are complex or when intent cannot be established. Informal transfers can work when all parties agree, but they may lack the legal finality that a court order provides. Choosing the right approach depends on documentation, parties’ positions, and desired timeline.
A limited filing like a Heggstad petition is appropriate when there is persuasive documentation or testimony showing the decedent intended the property to be held by a trust. This can include the trust document itself, communications indicating the decedent’s plan, or actions such as beneficiary designations and related estate planning steps. When these factors align, the court can often correct title without initiating full probate, saving time and legal costs. Having organized evidence ready at the outset strengthens the petition and reduces the chance of contested hearings or additional court procedures.
A limited approach is often successful when heirs, beneficiaries, and other interested parties either agree with the petition or do not raise timely objections. When parties cooperate, the court may treat the filing as a straightforward correction of title, proceed on declarations and written evidence, and issue an order placing the property into the trust. Cooperation reduces litigation risk and shortens the timeline for resolving ownership. Counsel can help coordinate notice and communications so that interested parties understand the petition and have an opportunity to raise any concerns before a hearing.
Comprehensive legal services become important when heirs or other parties contest whether the decedent intended to fund the trust or claim competing ownership rights. In such situations, filings may require more detailed evidence gathering, depositions, and court appearances. Counsel can develop a litigation strategy, identify additional documentary or testimonial support, and manage contested hearings. When property is high in value or conflicts are pronounced, a thorough approach protects the integrity of the estate plan and takes steps to resolve disputes through negotiation or litigation as appropriate, while seeking to minimize delays and the emotional strain on family members.
A comprehensive response is often needed when complicated title issues, liens, mortgages, or third-party interests affect the property. Addressing these matters may require coordination with title companies, lenders, or governmental entities, and may involve quiet title actions or related filings in addition to a Heggstad petition. Resolving encumbrances and ensuring clear marketable title can be essential when the trustee plans to sell or refinance property. Legal guidance helps identify the necessary steps to clear title, satisfy creditors properly, and obtain court orders that enable the trustee to act confidently in the estate’s best interests.
A comprehensive legal approach offers benefits such as thorough evidence collection, careful notice and service to interested parties, and proactive handling of potential objections or title issues. This approach reduces the risk of later challenges, provides stronger documentation for the court, and helps ensure that any order obtained will be durable and effective. In cases with significant assets or family disagreements, a full strategy can resolve matters more definitively and avoid repeated court returns, giving trustees and beneficiaries greater certainty about how the property will be administered under the trust.
Comprehensive handling also facilitates coordination with other estate administration tasks, such as inventorying assets, addressing creditor claims, and advising trustees on their duties after the court order. It can include post-order steps like updating title records, working with title companies to record the court order, and guiding trustees on selling or managing the property. This end-to-end assistance helps families move from a legal filing to practical asset administration, preserves estate plan intent, and supports timely distribution or management of the trust property in line with the decedent’s wishes.
A comprehensive strategy reduces the likelihood that interested parties will later attack a partial or hastily prepared court action. By collecting strong supporting evidence, ensuring proper notice, and coordinating with title and lending institutions, the resulting order is less vulnerable to collateral attack. This robust record also helps trustees act confidently when transferring, selling, or otherwise managing the property after the order. Taking these careful steps up front can save time and expense and help maintain family relationships by resolving ownership issues with clarity and legal finality.
After a successful Heggstad petition, trustees must follow through with recording orders, updating title records, and handling any financial or administrative matters tied to the property. A thorough legal approach anticipates these tasks and helps trustees complete them efficiently. Guidance on documentation required by title companies and steps to clear loans or liens prevents delays in sale or refinance situations. This planning ensures the trustee can manage or distribute the property under the trust terms without unexpected obstacles, helping beneficiaries receive their interests as the decedent intended.
Begin by collecting the trust document, any deeds, relevant communications, and records that show the decedent’s intent to place the property in trust. Early organization of these materials helps create a clear narrative for the court and may shorten the time required to prepare the petition. If there are emails, letters, or notes that reference the trust or convey intent, include them. Also assemble title reports, mortgage statements, and recent property tax records so potential encumbrances are identified and can be addressed during the process.
Identify mortgages, liens, or other encumbrances early and confirm whether lenders require additional documentation after a court order. Working with title companies or lenders in advance helps prevent unexpected obstacles when recording the court’s order or transferring title. If a sale or refinance is anticipated, understanding title clearance steps and recording procedures reduces delays. Proactive coordination ensures that the trustee can act promptly after the court ruling to manage or distribute the property in accordance with the trust terms.
You should consider a Heggstad petition when an intended trust asset remains titled in the decedent’s name and the trust document or other evidence indicates the property should have been transferred. This situation commonly arises with real estate where a deed was never recorded, or when administrative oversights left assets unfunded. A successful petition aligns legal title with the decedent’s plan, allowing trustees to oversee the asset under trust terms. Acting promptly can help avoid unnecessary probate and reduce administrative burdens on family members who take on fiduciary responsibilities.
Another reason to pursue this remedy is when heirs and beneficiaries want to honor the decedent’s expressed wishes but need a formal court declaration to clear title and permit trustee actions. A court order provides a clear legal mechanism for recording transfer and resolving any uncertainty about ownership. This is particularly helpful when the property must be sold, refinanced, or otherwise managed by the trustee. Seeking court recognition can provide the stability needed for practical administration and the fulfillment of the trust’s distribution provisions.
Common circumstances include the decedent drafting a revocable living trust but neglecting to record a deed for real property, transferring only some assets into the trust, or mistakenly leaving title in personal name. It can also arise when property ownership changes were planned but not finalized before death. These gaps generate uncertainty for trustees and beneficiaries about how to proceed without probate. A Heggstad petition clarifies the decedent’s intent and allows property to be treated as part of the trust for administration and distribution purposes under the trust’s terms.
A frequent scenario is when a deed meant to transfer real estate into a trust is prepared but not recorded before the owner’s death. In these cases, the property remains titled in the decedent’s name even though the trust document indicates an intent to fund the trust. Filing a Heggstad petition requests that the court recognize the property as trust-owned to align title with the estate plan. Successful petitions typically rely on the trust document, witness statements, and any actions showing the decedent intended the transfer.
Sometimes an estate is partially funded into a trust while other assets are inadvertently left out. Overlooked assets may include accounts, vehicles, or pieces of real property that the decedent assumed were covered. Addressing these oversight items through a Heggstad petition or other appropriate filings helps bring the estate into alignment with the trust maker’s intentions. This reduces the need for separate probate actions for each omitted asset and helps trustees administer the estate according to the trust’s terms.
When property owners move residences, refinance, or execute other transactions, title can revert to personal name unintentionally if deeds are not reissued to the trust. Similarly, some refinances may require re-conveyance steps that were not completed. These procedural lapses create situations where the asset appears outside the trust even though the decedent intended otherwise. A Heggstad petition can address such lapses by providing the court record that recognizes intended trust ownership and enables trustees to proceed with administration or disposition as needed.
If you are facing a funding omission for trust property in San Carlos, we provide practical legal assistance to evaluate the situation, gather proof of intent, and prepare the necessary court filing. We explain the Heggstad petition process, coordinate notice to interested parties, and work with title professionals when the court order needs to be recorded. Families often appreciate having a clear path to bring property into the trust so the trustee can proceed with administration. Our goal is to move cases forward in a respectful and organized manner while protecting the decedent’s plan.
We focus on practical solutions for trust funding issues, including Heggstad petitions, trust administration matters, and coordination with title companies. Our approach emphasizes thorough document review and clear communication with trustees and beneficiaries so the issues that led to an unfunded asset are resolved efficiently. Clients receive guidance on how to present evidence of intent and what steps to take following a favorable court order. The goal is to achieve a reliable outcome that allows trustees to carry out the trust’s terms without unnecessary delay.
When a trust asset is omitted, families face legal and administrative choices that affect timing, cost, and privacy. We help weigh options, from informal agreements to formal court petitions, and recommend the path that best fits the facts and the family’s objectives. We also assist with related documents such as pour-over wills, certification of trust, and transfer instruments needed after court orders are entered. Our role is to provide steady guidance so trustees can act confidently once title issues are resolved.
We also support preventive measures to reduce future issues, including reviewing estate plans and recommending funding steps that help ensure assets are properly titled during the trust maker’s lifetime. For families dealing with an unfunded asset now, we provide realistic timelines, cost estimates, and step-by-step support through filing, hearing, and post-order recording activities. Our aim is to make the legal process as straightforward as possible while preserving the decedent’s intended distribution of assets.
Our process begins with an initial review of trust documents and property records to determine whether a Heggstad petition is appropriate. We gather supporting evidence of intent, prepare the petition and required notices, and coordinate service to interested parties. If a hearing is necessary, we present the petition and supporting declarations to the court and respond to any objections. After an order is obtained, we assist with recording and title updates so trustees can manage or dispose of the property. Throughout, we keep clients informed and focus on clear next steps to move the matter to resolution.
The initial phase involves reviewing the trust, deed, and related documents to confirm that a Heggstad petition is the appropriate remedy. We identify what records are missing, determine who must be noticed, and outline the evidence needed to show the decedent’s intent. This stage often includes ordering preliminary title reports, locating mortgage or lien records, and identifying potential witnesses who can provide declarations. A clear assessment helps set expectations for timing, likely outcomes, and necessary steps.
Careful review of the trust instrument, any signed deeds, and property tax records helps build the factual foundation for a Heggstad petition. We look for language in the trust that specifically identifies the property or the mechanism intended for funding. We also verify ownership histories and any encumbrances that might affect transfer or recording of the court order. A detailed review reduces surprises and allows targeted document requests and declarations to support the petition.
Collecting statements from people who observed the decedent’s planning or who assisted with estate documents can be essential. Witnesses may include the trustee, family members, or professionals who discussed the trust with the decedent. We work with potential declarants to prepare clear narratives focused on direct observations and specific actions that demonstrate intent to fund the trust. Corroborating documentary evidence, such as emails or appointment notes, strengthens these declarations and supports a persuasive petition.
In this phase we draft the Heggstad petition, assemble declarations and supporting exhibits, and prepare the proposed court order for treatment of the property as trust property. We confirm proper notice procedures for interested parties and file the petition with the appropriate probate court in San Mateo County. The filing package is carefully organized to present a clear timeline of events and evidence of the decedent’s intent. Our goal is to make the petition straightforward for the court to review while addressing foreseeable questions or objections.
Drafting the petition requires a concise statement of facts, attachments that include the trust and property records, and declarations from relevant individuals. Exhibits are labeled and referenced clearly so the court can easily follow the evidence trail. A well-prepared petition anticipates likely challenges and frames the legal argument in a manner consistent with California probate practice. This preparation reduces the risk of continuances and positions the case for a productive hearing.
Proper service of notice to heirs, beneficiaries, and other interested parties is essential. We ensure notices comply with local court rules and statutory requirements, and we monitor responses. If objections arise, we analyze their basis and prepare responsive declarations or supplemental evidence. In many cases, timely and comprehensive responses resolve concerns and narrow the issues for the court, making the hearing more efficient and focused on the essential questions of intent and title.
At the hearing, the court reviews the petition, supporting declarations, and any objections. If the court finds the evidence persuasive, it will enter an order recognizing the property as trust property. After the order, we assist with recording the order with the county recorder, updating title records, and handling lender or title company requirements to clear the way for sale, refinance, or trustee management. These post-order tasks complete the transition from a legal ruling to practical administration of the asset.
During the hearing, the court may ask questions about the evidence, credibility of declarations, and any objections raised by interested parties. We present a clear factual narrative and respond to inquiries to support the requested relief. If the court issues an order, it typically specifies the property to be treated as trust property and may outline any steps required for recordation. A favorable ruling provides trustees with the legal authority needed to manage or distribute the asset under the trust terms.
After obtaining a court order, the next step is to record the order with the county recorder and provide it to title companies or lenders. Recording establishes the new legal status of the property and facilitates transactions like sales or refinances. If liens or mortgages exist, coordinating payoff or lien releases may be necessary. We assist trustees through these administrative steps to ensure the property’s title reflects the court’s determination and that the trustee can proceed with management or distribution consistent with the trust.
A Heggstad petition is a probate court filing used to ask the court to recognize that a decedent intended specific real property to be held by a trust despite no recorded transfer occurring before death. It is employed when the trust document or other credible evidence indicates an intention to fund the trust but a formal recorded conveyance was omitted. The petition presents facts and supporting declarations to demonstrate intent and requests that the court treat the property as part of the trust to allow trustee administration according to the trust terms. The relief provided by a Heggstad petition can be limited to the property in question and does not necessarily open full probate for the entire estate. When successful, the petition results in a court order allowing the trustee to manage or convey the property under trust authority, often streamlining administration and avoiding separate probate proceedings for that asset. The outcome depends on the evidence presented and the court’s assessment of the decedent’s intent.
A Heggstad petition may be appropriate if you can identify clear documentation or credible witness statements indicating the decedent intended the property to be held in a trust but the deed or recording step was not completed. Begin by reviewing the trust instrument, any prepared deeds, correspondence about funding the trust, and the decedent’s interactions with the trustee. If these materials suggest intent to fund the trust, a petition can often align title with the estate plan without full probate. If documentation is sparse, other remedies such as negotiated transfers among heirs or probate may be considered. The choice depends on the strength of available evidence, the level of agreement among interested parties, and any liens or title complications. Legal review helps determine the most practical route given local procedures in San Mateo County and the specifics of the property involved.
Courts evaluate evidence that shows the decedent’s intent to have the property belong to the trust. This includes the trust document, any signed deeds or transfer documents, statements by the decedent, and declarations from witnesses who had direct knowledge of the decedent’s plans. Documentary evidence such as emails, appointment notes, or contemporaneous records that reference funding the trust also supports the petition. The court assesses the credibility and consistency of these items in deciding whether to treat the property as trust property. Corroborating evidence is especially helpful when the deed was not recorded. Declarations should focus on direct observations, actions taken by the decedent toward funding the trust, and the context of estate planning activities. Clear presentation of exhibits and well-prepared witness statements increases the likelihood the court will find the evidence persuasive and issue the requested order.
A Heggstad petition can avoid the need for full probate for the specific asset at issue when the court finds the decedent intended to place it into the trust. The court’s order treats that property as trust property, allowing the trustee to manage or distribute it under the trust. However, the petition addresses only the particular asset or assets included in the filing and does not automatically resolve other estate matters that might require probate, such as assets titled solely in the decedent’s name with no clear intent to fund the trust. If property ownership or creditor issues are complex, additional court proceedings may still be necessary. The petition is most effective when targeted to specific assets with persuasive evidence of intent. When broader estate administration is needed, the Heggstad petition can be one part of a larger strategy to minimize probate where possible.
Timing for a Heggstad petition varies depending on the court’s schedule, the clarity of the evidence, and whether objections are filed. In cooperative cases with clear documentation and no objections, the process can move relatively quickly, often within a few months from initial filing to obtaining an order. Cases that encounter disputes, require additional discovery, or involve complex title issues may take longer and require multiple court appearances or supplemental filings. Working proactively to collect documents, prepare strong declarations, and provide proper notice to interested parties helps streamline the process. Local practice in San Mateo County influences hearing availability and procedure, so early assessment and careful preparation usually reduce delays and increase the chance of a timely resolution.
Notice typically must be provided to parties who might have an interest in the property or the estate, including heirs, beneficiaries, and any known creditors. The court will expect that interested parties have been informed of the petition and given an opportunity to respond. Proper service and proof of notice are important to avoid future challenges and to ensure the order can be recorded and relied upon by title companies and other third parties. Specific notice requirements can vary by county and case circumstances, so it is important to follow local rules carefully. Ensuring timely and correct notice helps prevent objections based solely on lack of information and supports a smoother hearing process for the petition.
Yes. Once the court enters an order recognizing the property as trust property, the trustee can take the necessary steps to record the court order with the county recorder and, if needed, execute a corrective deed or other conveyance consistent with the order. Recording the order establishes a public record that the property is to be treated as belonging to the trust and permits title companies to update their records accordingly. Trustees should confirm recording requirements and any document formats the recorder or title company requires. Coordination with title companies and lenders may be needed when mortgages or liens are present. Proper documentation and following recording instructions ensure the trustee can manage, refinance, or sell the property without unexpected complications related to title.
If an interested party objects to a Heggstad petition, the court will consider the objection and the supporting evidence from both sides. Objections may challenge the sufficiency or credibility of the evidence showing intent, or raise competing claims to the property. Resolving objections can involve supplemental declarations, additional documentary evidence, and sometimes testimony at a hearing. The court makes a determination based on the totality of the evidence presented and applicable legal standards. Addressing objections thoroughly and promptly is important to preserve the chance for a favorable ruling. In some cases, negotiation or mediation among interested parties can narrow disputes and lead to stipulations that simplify the court’s decision. When objections are resolvable, targeted responses and additional proof often lead to a constructive outcome that honors the decedent’s intentions.
A Heggstad petition addresses ownership of the property but does not automatically eliminate existing mortgages, liens, or other encumbrances. Those financial obligations remain attached to the property and must be handled as part of post-order administration. Trustees should identify all encumbrances early so plans for payoff, assumption, or resolution can be developed. Title companies and lenders often require documentation or steps to clear liens before transactions like sales or refinances can proceed, and coordination is necessary to satisfy those requirements. In some cases, resolving liens requires paying creditors, negotiating releases, or obtaining court orders addressing specific claims. Preparing for these matters when pursuing a Heggstad petition helps ensure that once the court recognizes trust ownership, the trustee can proceed with practical actions to manage or transfer the property without unresolved encumbrances impeding those transactions.
Preventing the need for a Heggstad petition starts with careful trust funding during the trust maker’s lifetime. This includes recording deeds that transfer real property into the trust, retitling financial accounts where appropriate, updating beneficiary designations, and confirming that all assets intended for the trust are properly titled. Regular reviews of estate plans, particularly after life events such as moves or refinancing, help catch issues before they create problems after death. Working with counsel to prepare clear funding instructions, maintain records of transfers, and coordinate with title and financial institutions reduces the chance that critical steps will be missed. Family discussions about the plan and designating a knowledgeable successor trustee who will follow through on funding steps also support a smoother transition and reduce the likelihood of needing court interventions after death.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas