At the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman we help Lompoc and Santa Barbara County families resolve Heggstad petition matters related to estate planning and trustee administration. A Heggstad petition seeks court recognition that assets were properly transferred to a decedent’s trust even though title records or beneficiary designations did not reflect the transfer at the time of death. We assist clients in assembling trust documents, proof of transfer, and supporting affidavits so a probate or superior court can confirm the trust’s control over assets. Our approach focuses on clear communication, careful documentation, and practical solutions to reduce delay and expense while honoring the decedent’s intentions.
Many Heggstad matters arise alongside related estate planning documents such as revocable living trusts, pour-over wills, certification of trust forms, HIPAA authorizations, and powers of attorney. Addressing these matters promptly helps preserve estate value and prevents family disputes that can arise from unclear title. We work with trustees and family members to identify all potentially impacted assets, coordinate with banks and title companies, prepare necessary petitions and declarations, and explain what to expect in court. Our goal is to manage the procedural requirements efficiently so that assets can be distributed according to the trust without unnecessary legal battles.
Filing a Heggstad petition can be essential to clear title and enable the trustee to manage or distribute assets according to the trust document. Resolving these issues avoids prolonged probate, reduces administrative friction with banks and financial institutions, and minimizes family uncertainty about who controls property. A favorable court determination restores confidence in the trustee’s authority, allowing transfers, sales, and distributions to proceed. Addressing the matter with thorough documentation and a carefully prepared petition helps shorten court timelines, lower dispute risk, and ensure that assets pass as the decedent intended, protecting beneficiaries and fiduciary duties alike.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman serves clients across California with a focus on practical estate planning and trust administration services. Our team assists with revocable living trusts, pour-over wills, trust modifications, trust certification documents, Heggstad petitions, and related filings to support trustees and family members during post-death administration. We emphasize careful document review, purposeful communication with beneficiaries and institutions, and thorough preparation of court filings when needed. By combining procedural knowledge with an understanding of family dynamics, we help clients resolve trust transfer issues while keeping cost and delay to a minimum.
A Heggstad petition is a court request typically used when property appears to remain outside a trust because title or transfer documentation was not updated before a person’s death. The petition asks the court to recognize that the decedent intended the property to be part of the trust and to confirm that the trust governs distribution. Preparing a successful petition involves documenting the decedent’s intent, showing the trust instrument and related assignments, and sometimes establishing that the trustee already exercised control over the asset. Clear evidence and coherent pleadings help the court make a binding determination that facilitates trust administration.
Not every transfer problem requires a Heggstad petition, but when financial institutions, title companies, or county records resist recognizing trust ownership, a petition provides a formal route to resolve the dispute. The process can involve declarations from witnesses, copies of the executed trust, assignment or trust transfer forms, and a factual narrative tying the asset to the trust. Timely action reduces the likelihood of asset depreciation, prevents administrative delays, and reduces the risk of contested proceedings among heirs. The goal is to align legal title with the trust maker’s intentions to allow administration to proceed smoothly.
A Heggstad petition seeks judicial recognition that an asset intended to be trust property was effectively transferred despite missing or outdated public records. This remedy arises from case law that permits substitution of the trust for the decedent when credible documentation shows the transfer was intended but not completed in the records. The petition asks the court to accept trust documents, affidavits, and other evidence to restore title or allow the trustee to act. The process provides legal certainty for trustees, enabling them to manage, sell, or distribute the subject asset in the ordinary course of trust administration.
Success with a Heggstad petition hinges on a well-documented factual record, including the original trust, related signature pages, assignments or transfer documents, and statements from witnesses or fiduciaries who can attest to the decedent’s intent. The preparation phase includes gathering bank statements, deeds, beneficiary designation forms, and communications that demonstrate the trustmaker’s intent. Filing requires drafting a clear petition, supporting declarations, and a proposed order for the court. Service on interested parties and careful responses to any objections are part of the process, and the court’s ruling will either confirm trust control or identify further steps needed.
Understanding common terms helps clients follow the Heggstad petition process and related trust administration matters. Key phrases include trust administration, pour-over will, certification of trust, assignment to trust, executor versus trustee distinctions, and informal versus formal probate alternatives. Knowing these concepts clarifies why a court petition may be necessary and what documents will be persuasive. We explain each term in everyday language and show how it relates to your situation so you can participate in decision making and support the trustee’s efforts to settle the estate in accordance with the trustmaker’s wishes.
A Heggstad petition is a legal filing that asks a court to recognize that an asset should be treated as part of a decedent’s trust even though public records did not reflect the transfer prior to death. The name comes from case law establishing that courts can accept evidence proving intent to transfer. Typical evidence includes the trust document, assignments, bank records, and witness declarations. The petition provides a judicial remedy to align legal title with the trustmaker’s intentions and to allow trustees to manage or distribute the asset without unnecessary delay or further dispute.
A pour-over will serves as a backup that directs any assets not already titled in the trust to be transferred into the trust upon death. It ensures that property omitted from trust funding is still intended to be administered under the trust’s terms. While a pour-over will typically still requires probate to transfer assets, it works together with a living trust to capture loose assets and help centralize distribution. Proper coordination between the trust and pour-over will reduces the need for separate probate proceedings and supports comprehensive estate administration.
A certification of trust is a short-form document that summarizes essential trust information for financial institutions and third parties without revealing private terms. It typically includes the trust name, date, trustee authority, and how the trust can be contacted, and it is often used to demonstrate a trustee’s authority to act while keeping the full trust instrument confidential. Certification can streamline dealings with banks, title companies, and insurers during administration and can be important when establishing authority before addressing Heggstad petition issues or related transfers.
An assignment of assets to trust is a document that transfers ownership of specific property from an individual to the trust. Assignments can include deeds for real estate, title transfers for vehicles, or written statements assigning bank accounts or securities to the trust. In Heggstad situations, assignments or evidence that an assignment was intended but not recorded are central to showing the trustmaker’s intent. Clear and properly executed assignment documentation reduces the need for litigation and supports the trustee’s ability to manage and distribute trust property promptly.
When dealing with assets not reflected in trust records, families may consider informal trust administration, formal probate, or a Heggstad petition to resolve title issues. Informal administration can be quicker and less costly when all parties agree, while formal probate provides a fully supervised court process that may be necessary for complex disputes or unclear instruments. A Heggstad petition targets the specific problem of unrecorded transfers and can be an efficient alternative to full probate when the evidence supports inclusion in the trust. The right choice depends on asset type, family dynamics, the banks involved, and how clear the evidentiary record is.
A limited approach may be appropriate when the trust document, assignment records, and bank statements clearly demonstrate that assets were intended to be in trust and beneficiaries or heirs agree on distribution. Cooperation from financial institutions and title companies also helps resolve matters without court intervention. In such cases, preparing a certification of trust or presenting signed assignments and ownership records may be enough to update account titles and transfer assets. Choosing this route can save time and costs, provided there is consensus and the institutions involved accept the supporting documentation.
If the asset in question has modest value and there is little risk of contest from parties with competing claims, institutions may accept documentary proof without initiating court proceedings. For instance, a bank might accept a certification of trust plus an assignment for a small account. When stakes are low and relationships among heirs are stable, informal resolution minimizes costs and administrative burden. That said, even low-value assets sometimes require formal action if title companies or recorders insist on judicial confirmation before transferring ownership.
Comprehensive legal action is often needed when beneficiaries or third parties contest whether an asset should be included in a trust, or when title companies refuse to accept documentary proof without a court order. In such situations, filing a Heggstad petition clarifies the legal status of the asset and provides a binding resolution. The court evaluates the evidence, hears objections, and issues an order recognizing the trust’s control if warranted. Handling contested matters through court filings helps avoid recurring disputes and establishes clear legal authority for trustees to act.
When asset records are complex, involve multiple jurisdictions, or include high-value property such as real estate or retirement accounts, a comprehensive legal approach is advisable. These situations may require careful forensic review of documents, coordination with out-of-state custodians, and detailed pleadings to present a persuasive case to the court. Courts may demand more fulsome evidence for significant assets, and the stakes justify professional handling to protect beneficiary interests and to ensure regulatory or institutional requirements are fully met before title can be transferred or sold.
A comprehensive approach culminating in a court order provides lasting certainty: once the judge recognizes a transfer into the trust, banks and title companies must comply, and the trustee receives clear authority to manage, sell, or distribute the asset. This finality reduces the likelihood of future challenges and protects fiduciaries from liability concerns. It also avoids fragmented outcomes where different institutions take inconsistent positions, and it provides beneficiaries with a definitive resolution that supports orderly administration of the estate under the trust document.
Choosing a court-backed process can also prevent incremental disputes that consume time and resources. While litigation is not the first choice for everyone, a well-drafted petition paired with organized evidence often resolves the core issue efficiently. The resulting order streamlines downstream transactions, including sales, title transfers, or beneficiary distributions, because it eliminates institutional reticence. For families concerned about preserving estate value and avoiding repeated challenges, the certainty provided by a judicial determination is often worthwhile despite the initial procedural steps.
Securing a court order confirming trust ownership gives trustees clear legal authority recognized by financial institutions, title companies, and third parties. This certainty prevents institutions from imposing additional delays and reduces the risk that future claims will disrupt administration. With an enforceable order, the trustee can proceed with needed transfers, sales, or beneficiary distributions without hesitation. This legal certainty also better protects trustees who must balance duty to beneficiaries and the administrative demands of dealing with reluctant institutions.
Although pursuing a formal petition involves upfront time and expense, resolving the issue definitively often reduces long-term costs by preventing repeated objections or new disputes that could arise later. A single court determination can close the door on contested claims and remove ambiguity from the estate administration process. That saved time and the reduction in administrative friction frequently offset initial costs, particularly where assets have significant value or where multiple institutions are involved. Families benefit from predictable timelines and fewer interruptions to trust administration.
Gathering the trust document, any signed assignments, bank statements, deeds, and communications that show the decedent intended the asset to be in the trust is the most important step. Early collection prevents delays later when a bank or title company requests proof. Affidavits from witnesses, trustees, or the person who handled the decedent’s affairs can strengthen the factual record. Organize these items chronologically and make clear copies so the court and institutions can readily see how the asset relates to the trust.
Open communication among beneficiaries, the trustee, and relevant institutions reduces conflict and can help resolve issues without court intervention. Provide institutions with organized documentation and clear explanations about the transfer history and the trust’s terms. When beneficiaries understand the process and see the supporting documents, they are less likely to contest routine transfers. If institutions remain uncooperative, presenting a clear plan for filing a Heggstad petition often encourages cooperation and reduces the time needed for judicial resolution.
You should consider a Heggstad petition when an asset appears to remain outside the trust due to incomplete record updates, institutional refusal to accept documentary proof, or when the trustee needs clear legal authority to act. Secure court recognition when institutions or recorders demand judicial confirmation before changing titles or releasing funds. This action protects trustee authority, preserves the estate’s value, and helps ensure efficient distribution to beneficiaries. Timely filing also reduces the risk that unresolved title issues will complicate future transactions or lead to claims against the trustee.
Another reason to pursue this service is when family disagreements or competing claims make informal resolution unlikely. A court order can resolve disputes about intent and the legal status of assets, preventing protracted conflicts and clarifying each party’s rights. A formal determination is especially important for high-value assets, property in multiple jurisdictions, or situations where institutions remain unyielding. By seeking a judicial ruling, the trustee can proceed confidently and beneficiaries obtain a clear, enforceable path to distribution under the trust instrument.
Typical circumstances include recently executed trusts where funding was incomplete, bank or brokerage accounts still bearing the decedent’s name, deeds not retitled into the trust, or retirement accounts and insurance policies with older beneficiary designations. Other triggers include institutions demanding a court order to accept a trustee’s authority, unclear assignment paperwork, or disputes among heirs that leave institutions unwilling to release assets. Recognizing these patterns early allows trustees to gather documentation and consider a petition before asset management becomes more difficult or contentious.
Real estate often remains in a decedent’s name when deeds were not updated to reflect ownership in a trust. When title companies or county recorders require more than a deed to retitle property, a Heggstad petition can provide the legal recognition needed to place the property into trust ownership. Preparing such a petition involves collecting deeds, trust documents, and any correspondence or settlement statements that show the intent to transfer. Court confirmation then enables the trustee to sell, refinance, or distribute the property as the trust directs.
Banks and brokerage firms sometimes refuse to transfer accounts to a trustee without court confirmation, particularly when account paperwork is missing or beneficiary designations are unclear. Presenting a Heggstad petition accompanied by account statements, assignment records, and a certification of trust helps persuade a court to confirm the account’s inclusion in the trust. Once the court issues an order, the institution typically will update its records and allow the trustee to manage or distribute funds in accordance with the trust.
When trust funding was left incomplete and family members disagree about whether an asset should be administered under the trust, institutions are less likely to accept informal documentation. A Heggstad petition resolves the question by placing the matter before the court, which examines the evidence and issues a binding determination. Bringing the issue to court can reduce ongoing conflict and prevent repeated challenges to the trustee’s actions, allowing the estate administration to proceed without repeated interruptions or further disputes between parties.
If you are dealing with an asset that institutions refuse to recognize as trust property, we provide focused assistance in compiling the documentary record, drafting the petition, serving interested parties, and representing the trustee at any required hearing. Serving clients in Lompoc and throughout Santa Barbara County, the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman helps navigate the procedural requirements and prepares a persuasive presentation to the court. Our goal is to obtain an enforceable order that allows trustees to proceed with management, sale, or distribution of the asset in line with the trustmaker’s directions.
We bring practical experience handling Heggstad petitions and trust administration matters across California, including in Santa Barbara County and Lompoc. Our approach emphasizes careful document assembly, clear legal pleadings, and timely communication with trustees, beneficiaries, and institutions. We focus on resolving title and transfer disputes efficiently while protecting the fiduciary’s ability to act and preserving estate value. Clients rely on us for straightforward explanations, realistic timelines, and coordinated action to reduce delays that can arise when institutions require judicial confirmation.
When financial institutions or title companies demand additional proof of trust ownership, having well-prepared pleadings and a coherent evidentiary package increases the chance of a favorable outcome. We assist by reviewing trust instruments, identifying needed supporting documents, preparing declarations that recount the trustmaker’s intent, and following the procedural rules for filing and serving interested parties. Our practice aims to streamline the process so that trustees can secure court confirmation without unnecessary procedural setbacks and proceed with trust administration as soon as possible.
We also provide practical guidance to trustees on interim steps they can take while a petition is pending, such as obtaining a certification of trust, communicating with beneficiaries, and preserving asset records. By preparing a thorough petition and evidentiary record, we aim to limit the scope of hearings and minimize contest risk. This measured approach helps clients maintain momentum in estate administration and achieve outcomes that honor the trustmaker’s directives and protect the interests of beneficiaries and fiduciaries alike.
Our process begins with a thorough intake to identify the asset, collect the trust document and supporting records, and determine which institutions are involved. We then outline the steps and timelines, prepare a certification of trust if helpful, and assemble the petition with declarations and exhibits. After filing, we serve interested parties and respond to any inquiries or objections. If a hearing is required, we present the evidence and seek a judicial order recognizing the asset as trust property. Throughout, we keep trustees informed and focused on practical next steps for administration.
The first phase involves collecting the trust instrument, any signed assignments, account or title documentation, beneficiary designations, closing statements, and witness affidavits. We review these materials to determine whether informal resolution is possible or whether a petition is advisable. This review identifies any gaps in the record and informs the supplemental evidence we will need. Early identification of missing items reduces the risk of surprise requirements from institutions or the court and expedites the path to judicial recognition if a petition is necessary.
When a certification of trust will be useful, we draft a concise document summarizing essential trust details for institutions and prepare declarations from trustees or witnesses that explain the transfer history. These documents often persuade banks or title companies to accept trustee authority without court action. We also organize exhibits such as account statements, deeds, and correspondence so that if a petition is necessary, the evidentiary record is already compiled and ready for filing with the court.
After reviewing the documents and discussing the institutions’ positions, we advise whether a formal Heggstad petition is the prudent next step. Criteria include the strength of documentary proof, the value of the asset, and the likelihood of institutional compliance without a court order. We explain the benefits and trade-offs of informal approaches versus court filings and recommend the path that best protects the trustee’s interests while seeking a timely resolution for beneficiaries.
If a petition is warranted, we draft a clear petition that lays out the factual background, attaches the trust and supporting exhibits, and presents declarations that demonstrate the trustmaker’s intent. We prepare a proposed order and follow local rules for filing and service to ensure the court has complete information. Filing begins the formal process of obtaining judicial recognition and puts institutions and interested parties on formal notice, which often prompts cooperative responses or clarifies any needed factual supplementation.
After filing, we serve beneficiaries and other interested parties following statutory requirements. We monitor responses and, if objections arise, we address them through supplemental declarations, evidence, or negotiated resolutions where appropriate. Timely and organized responses reduce distraction and help keep the matter focused on the core legal question of whether the asset should be recognized as part of the trust. We aim to resolve disputes promptly and minimize the need for protracted litigation.
If the court schedules a hearing, we prepare a concise courtroom presentation supported by declarations and exhibits that clearly demonstrate the trustmaker’s intent and the asset’s connection to the trust. We present relevant documentary evidence and any witness declarations and respond to judicial inquiries. The objective is to secure an order that confirms the trust’s ownership of the asset so institutions will comply with the trustee’s instructions and the trustee can proceed with administration, sale, or distribution as appropriate.
Once the court issues an order recognizing the asset as trust property, we assist the trustee in presenting the order to financial institutions, title companies, or county recorders to complete transfers, retitling, or distributions. We coordinate the logistics of any sale, transfer, or beneficiary distributions and ensure proper documentation is recorded. This follow-through helps translate the court’s ruling into practical outcomes, enabling the trustee to complete statutory duties and close the matter in a way that respects the trustmaker’s instructions.
After obtaining an order, we work with banks and title companies to present certified copies and any required supporting documents so assets can be transferred or released. Institutions often have internal compliance procedures that must be followed, and we help guide trustees through those steps. This coordination ensures the trustee can access funds, change account ownership, or retitle real estate in a manner consistent with the court’s directive, reducing additional hold-ups and helping finalize administration promptly.
Once transfers are complete, we advise trustees on final accounting, distribution procedures, and best practices for retaining trust records and court documents. Proper record keeping protects the trustee and provides transparency to beneficiaries. We also recommend steps to update estate plans or beneficiary designations when needed to avoid similar issues in the future. Concluding the matter with careful documentation helps prevent later disputes and maintains a clear administrative trail for any potential scrutiny.
A Heggstad petition is a court filing that requests judicial recognition that an asset should be treated as part of a decedent’s trust despite public records not reflecting that transfer at the time of death. The petition presents the trust instrument and supporting evidence showing the decedent’s intent to transfer the asset into the trust, such as signed assignments, account statements, deeds, or witness declarations. When accepted by the court, the order confirms the trustee’s authority to manage or distribute the asset under the trust’s terms. Filing a petition is often necessary when financial institutions or title companies refuse to accept documentary proof alone, or when record discrepancies create uncertainty over legal title. The petition provides a formal resolution and a binding order that institutions must recognize, enabling trustees to proceed with management, sale, or distribution. The process reduces the risk of future disputes by aligning legal title with the trustmaker’s intent through a judicial determination.
The timeline for resolving a Heggstad petition varies based on court schedules, the complexity of the evidentiary record, and whether any interested parties object. In some straightforward cases with cooperative beneficiaries and clear documentation, a petition may be resolved in a matter of weeks to a few months, particularly if the institution accepts the evidence and no hearing is required. However, if the court schedules a hearing or objections are filed, the process can extend several months depending on local court calendars and the need for supplemental evidence. Early and thorough preparation typically shortens the timeline because complete and organized documentation reduces the need for continued discovery or supplemental filings. Prompt service of the petition on interested parties and constructive engagement with institutions can also help expedite matters. While timing cannot be guaranteed, planning for possible hearings and coordinating with all stakeholders improves the likelihood of a timely resolution.
Key documents to support a Heggstad petition include the operative trust instrument, any signature or execution pages establishing the trustmaker’s intent, and records showing the asset’s connection to the trust such as deeds, account statements, closing statements, or assignment forms. Declarations from trustees, witnesses, or third parties who handled the decedent’s affairs can provide additional factual context. A certification of trust is also helpful to establish the trustee’s authority without exposing private trust terms. Information from financial institutions, title companies, and county records are often required as exhibits to the petition. Gathering these items early and organizing them into a coherent evidentiary packet makes the petition more persuasive and reduces the likelihood of additional court requests. Copies should be clear and accompanied by explanations tying each item to the trustmaker’s intent to fund the trust.
A Heggstad petition addresses the specific problem of title or record discrepancies and can often eliminate the need for a full probate proceeding for the affected asset, but it does not replace probate in all circumstances. If most estate assets are already properly funded to a trust, a Heggstad petition provides a targeted remedy to bring an unrecorded asset under trust control. This can help avoid separate probate administration for that asset, particularly when the trust governs the decedent’s estate comprehensively. However, if multiple assets remain outside the trust or other issues such as creditor claims or disputes among heirs exist, probate may still be necessary for some matters. The petition is a useful tool to minimize probate where the evidentiary record supports trust inclusion, but the broader estate context determines whether probate is required for other assets or issues.
Many banks and title companies accept a properly prepared certification of trust along with supporting documentation to establish a trustee’s authority, which can sometimes avoid the need for a court order. A certification summarizes essential trust details without disclosing private terms and may be sufficient when documentation is clear and parties are cooperative. Institutions have internal policies, and acceptance varies by institution and the type or value of the asset involved. When institutions decline to accept the certification, they often request a court order instead. In those cases, a Heggstad petition provides the judicial confirmation needed to overcome institutional reluctance. If a certification is insufficient, the petition and accompanying exhibits become the formal pathway to achieving the same outcome with enforceable court authority.
When beneficiaries object to a Heggstad petition, the court considers the evidence presented by both sides and evaluates whether the record supports inclusion of the asset in the trust. Objections may prompt supplemental declarations, discovery, or a hearing where each side can present testimony and documents. The court’s role is to resolve factual disputes and issue an order based on the weight of the evidence and relevant law. A well-documented petition that clearly shows intent and transfer-related actions improves the trustee’s position in the face of objections. Objections do not automatically prevent the trustee from pursuing the petition, but they can extend timelines and increase procedural work. Where possible, negotiating resolutions among parties or clarifying misunderstandings early often reduces contention. If the dispute proceeds, the court’s decision provides finality and a clear pathway for administration based on the ruling.
Heggstad petitions are relatively common in real estate cases because deeds and title records are often not updated before death, particularly when property owners believe the existence of a trust is sufficient or when transfers were attempted but not completed. Real estate also involves county recorders and title companies that may be cautious about retitling without judicial confirmation when the deed record is incomplete or ambiguous. For these reasons, courts frequently see petitions seeking recognition of property as belonging to a trust despite gaps in the recorded chain of title. When property is at issue, gathering closing statements, escrow records, signed deeds, and any communications indicating intent becomes especially important. Real estate transfers often demand clear documentary chains, and when that chain is imperfect, a Heggstad petition helps the trustee secure recorded title or facilitate sales with confidence that the trust’s interests are protected.
Heggstad petitions can apply to retirement accounts and life insurance in limited circumstances, but those assets often have beneficiary designations that govern their disposition outside of trust processes. If beneficiary designations are outdated or the account custodian refuses to honor a trustee’s claim, a petition may be used to clarify the account’s status when there is evidence the decedent intended the asset to fund the trust. The specific rules for retirement accounts and insurance policies differ by custodian and contract terms, so review of plan documents and beneficiary forms is necessary. Because retirement accounts and life insurance may have tax or contractual consequences, handling these assets carefully is important. A court order can resolve disputes about ownership or beneficiary designations when documentary evidence supports trust inclusion, but coordination with plan administrators and consideration of plan rules often plays a central role in the approach.
The cost of filing a Heggstad petition varies depending on the complexity of the factual record, the number of interested parties, and whether objections require additional filings or a contested hearing. Simpler matters with cooperative parties and clear documentation tend to cost less because preparation and filing are straightforward. When evidence is scattered, multiple jurisdictions are involved, or hearings are necessary, costs increase due to additional research, filings, and court appearances. Filing fees and potential service costs are separate and vary by county.
To reduce the likelihood of needing a Heggstad petition, keep estate plans well funded by retitling assets into the trust, updating beneficiary designations to align with trust objectives, and recording deeds or assignments promptly. Regularly review accounts and property titles and confirm that estate planning documents are current and coordinated. Maintaining a certification of trust on file with major institutions can help avoid future friction and provide quick proof of trustee authority if needed. Clear communication with family members about the plan, and periodic reviews with the attorney who prepared the documents, also prevent many funding oversights. When transfers are completed and records updated in a timely manner, institutions are more likely to accept the trustee’s authority without requiring court intervention.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas