If you created a trust and now need to modify its terms or correct provisions, a trust modification petition can help you adjust the document while protecting beneficiaries and assets. At the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman, we assist residents of Vandenberg Village and Santa Barbara County with practical strategies for seeking court approval to change an existing trust when circumstances have changed. This page explains when a petition is appropriate, what the process looks like in California courts, and how to prepare the necessary documents and evidence to support a successful modification request.
Trust modification petitions arise for many reasons, including changes in family dynamics, tax law updates, property transfers, and errors in original trust documents. Filing a petition requires attention to detail, careful drafting of proposed amendments, and a clear presentation of the reasons for modification to the court. We outline the steps to begin a petition in Santa Barbara County, the notice requirements to beneficiaries, and common outcomes so you can make informed decisions about whether a petition is the right approach for your situation.
A trust modification petition allows parties to request judicial approval to change trust terms that no longer reflect the grantor’s intent or current circumstances. Benefits include correcting drafting errors, accommodating life changes such as marriage, divorce, or the birth of children, and updating provisions to reflect new tax rules or asset structures. Seeking a court-ordered modification can provide legal clarity, reduce future disputes among beneficiaries, and ensure that fiduciary duties are observed moving forward. Properly managed petitions can preserve the trust’s overall framework while addressing targeted issues that might otherwise cause conflict or administrative difficulty.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman represents clients across California in estate planning matters, including trust modification petitions. Our team helps clients analyze trust documents, determine the most effective legal pathway for change, and prepare petitions and supporting declarations tailored to local court requirements. We provide clear guidance on notice to beneficiaries, negotiation strategies to avoid contested hearings where possible, and courtroom representation if a hearing is necessary. Our approach focuses on practical solutions that protect client goals while reducing the risk of future litigation or administrative burdens for trustees and beneficiaries.
A trust modification petition is a legal filing asking a court to approve changes to a trust when circumstances make the original terms inappropriate or unworkable. In California, modifications can be sought for a variety of reasons, including ambiguity in trust language, changes in assets, altered relationships among beneficiaries, or newly discovered facts. The court considers factors such as the grantor’s probable intent, fairness to beneficiaries, and whether the requested changes align with statutory rules. Understanding these criteria helps petitioners prepare a persuasive record and anticipate potential beneficiary objections during the process.
Preparation for a petition typically involves gathering trust documents, financial records, correspondence, and other evidence that explains why modification is necessary. Petitioners must also follow procedural rules for filing in the appropriate county, serving notice on interested parties, and submitting proposed amended trust language. Courts may require mediation or informal negotiation before hearing contested matters. A well-prepared petition emphasizes clarity, documented reasons for change, and proposed language that balances the grantor’s original intent with present realities, which can help achieve an efficient and favorable outcome.
A trust modification petition formally requests judicial authority to amend an existing trust instrument. The petition explains the grounds for modification, such as errors, changed circumstances, or the grantor’s later intent, and offers proposed revised terms for the court to review. Courts evaluate whether the requested modification is fair to beneficiaries and consistent with the law. Filing a petition is appropriate when informal agreement among interested parties is not possible or when legal clarity is required to resolve uncertainties that could impede administration of the trust or lead to disputes in the future.
Key elements of a trust modification petition include a clear explanation of circumstances warranting change, supporting evidence, proposed amended trust language, and proof of service to beneficiaries and other interested parties. The court process may involve an initial petition filing, a response period for beneficiaries, and a hearing where the judge reviews the evidence and arguments. Depending on the case, the court may approve the petition, deny it, or request modifications to the proposed terms. Petitioners should be prepared to address questions about intent, fairness, and the practical effects of the requested amendments.
Understanding common terms helps clarify the modification process. Definitions include grantor, trustee, beneficiary, petition, proposed amendment, and notice of hearing. Recognizing how these roles and documents interact aids in preparing a petition that meets procedural requirements and communicates the reasons for change in a way the court can evaluate fairly. This glossary section summarizes terms you will encounter while pursuing a trust modification and explains how they apply within the California probate and trust law framework, reducing confusion during each stage of the process.
The grantor is the person who established the trust and originally set its terms. The grantor’s intent, as reflected in the trust document and related evidence, plays a central role in petitions to modify the trust. Courts aim to honor that intent while allowing adjustments when circumstances change or drafting errors arise. In modification proceedings, petitioners often present evidence of the grantor’s probable intent or later statements that clarify how the grantor would have wanted the trust to operate under current conditions.
A proposed amendment is the specific language submitted to the court describing the requested change to the trust. It should be clear, legally precise, and framed to achieve the intended effect while minimizing ambiguity. Judges review proposed amendments to determine whether they respect the grantor’s intent and protect beneficiaries’ rights. Well-drafted proposed amendments also address implementation details, such as successor trustee powers and distribution timelines, so that the court can approve terms that are administrable and consistent with trust law.
The trustee is the individual or entity charged with administering the trust assets and carrying out the terms of the trust for the benefit of beneficiaries. Trustees have fiduciary duties to manage assets prudently, follow trust provisions, and act in beneficiaries’ best interests. In a modification petition, trustees may be petitioners, respondents, or neutral parties responsible for implementing court-approved changes. The court will consider how proposed modifications affect trustee responsibilities and whether additional powers or safeguards are needed to ensure proper administration.
Beneficiaries are the individuals or organizations entitled to receive benefits from the trust. Their rights and interests are central to any modification petition because changes can materially affect distributions and entitlements. Courts require notice to beneficiaries and an opportunity to respond to proposed amendments. When beneficiaries object, the court weighs their concerns along with the petition’s stated rationale to determine whether the modification is appropriate and equitable under the circumstances.
When considering changes to a trust, parties may pursue informal amendments through agreement among the grantor and beneficiaries or proceed with a formal court petition. Informal amendments can be quicker and less costly when all interested parties agree and the trust allows such modification without judicial approval. However, informal processes may not resolve disputes or provide legal certainty. A court petition creates an enforceable order and resolves contested issues but involves filing, notice, and potential hearings. Choosing the right route depends on the nature of the change, the willingness of beneficiaries to cooperate, and the need for definitive judicial approval.
A limited approach to modifying a trust may be sufficient when all beneficiaries and the grantor agree to the change and the trust instrument permits such modifications without court intervention. In these situations, parties can document the amendment in writing, obtain necessary signatures, and update trust administration records. This path avoids the time and expense of a petition while achieving the desired outcome. It still requires careful drafting to ensure the amendment is valid under California law and addresses tax or asset transfer implications to prevent unintended consequences later on.
Technical corrections or clarifying ambiguous language may be resolved without court action when the change does not alter beneficiary rights or distribution amounts and all interested parties consent. Examples include fixing typographical errors, clarifying dates, or correcting legal descriptions of property. Even for minor changes, it is important to maintain clear documentation showing the reason for the correction and the agreement of beneficiaries to avoid future disputes. When uncertainty remains about the effect of a correction, seeking legal advice can help determine whether a petition is advisable for long-term certainty.
When beneficiaries disagree about proposed changes, a court petition is often necessary to resolve disputes and obtain legally enforceable direction. Litigation provides a structured forum where evidence can be presented, competing interpretations weighed, and the judge can issue an order that binds all parties. This process protects the integrity of the trust and reduces the risk of future challenges by creating a clear, court-validated record of the reasons for modification and the exact terms approved.
Substantial changes affecting distributions, beneficiary rights, or trustee powers typically require formal judicial review to ensure fairness and legality. Courts scrutinize major amendments for consistency with the grantor’s intent, statutory constraints, and potential impacts on creditors and contingent beneficiaries. A court-approved modification provides legal certainty, clarifies the trustee’s authority to act under the new terms, and limits the risk of subsequent challenges that could unsettle trust administration or expose trustees to liability for acting without judicial authorization.
Pursuing a comprehensive, court-approved modification provides a definitive resolution when trust terms are disputed or require substantive change. Court approval reduces the likelihood of future litigation, clarifies the legal obligations of trustees, and ensures that amendments are enforceable against all beneficiaries. This approach also creates a public record that reflects the rationale for change and the exact language approved, which assists future trustees and legal commentators in understanding how the trust should be administered under the revised terms.
A comprehensive approach can also address complex issues such as tax consequences, property transfers, and retirement account allocations under revised provisions. By bringing these matters before the court, petitioners gain a level of legal certainty that informal changes lack. The judge’s order can provide guidance on implementation steps, deadlines, and trustee powers, which can streamline administration and reduce prolonged disputes among beneficiaries or third parties who might otherwise challenge unclear or informal modifications.
One major benefit of a comprehensive court-approved modification is legal certainty. When the court approves changes, those modifications become enforceable and less vulnerable to later challenges by disgruntled beneficiaries. Finality reduces administrative burdens on trustees and provides clear direction on distributions and fiduciary duties. This certainty supports smoother estate administration and can protect trustees from disputes that would otherwise consume time and resources, enabling beneficiaries to receive their intended benefits without prolonged litigation.
Court-ordered modifications safeguard both trustees and beneficiaries by clarifying responsibilities and rights under the new terms. Trustees gain explicit authority to act according to the approved changes, reducing exposure to liability claims for lawful administration. Beneficiaries benefit from documented court findings that explain why changes were necessary and how distributions will proceed. This shared protection promotes transparency and trust in the administration process while minimizing the potential for later contests or uncertainty about fiduciary actions.
Compile all relevant documents and written evidence that explain why a change to the trust is needed. This includes the original trust, amendments, correspondence, financial records, and any statements reflecting the grantor’s later intentions. Clear documentation helps the court understand the factual basis for the petition and reduces ambiguity about the reasons for modification. Comprehensive records also make it easier to address objections from beneficiaries and to demonstrate that the proposed changes align with the grantor’s probable wishes and current circumstances.
Provide timely and accurate notice to beneficiaries and other interested parties in accordance with California procedural rules. Early communication can sometimes facilitate negotiated resolutions that avoid contested hearings. Even when parties cannot agree, proper notice ensures the court can proceed and that all stakeholders have an opportunity to be heard. Documenting service and communications with beneficiaries also helps establish that the process complied with legal requirements and reduces grounds for later challenges to the petition on procedural bases.
Consider a trust modification petition when the trust no longer reflects the grantor’s intent or when changes in personal or financial circumstances make the original provisions impractical. Common triggers include changes in family relationships such as divorce or remarriage, significant shifts in asset composition, new tax considerations, or newly discovered errors in the trust instrument. A petition provides a formal avenue to correct these issues in a way that clarifies rights and obligations for trustees and beneficiaries, reducing uncertainty in estate administration going forward.
Another reason to pursue a petition is to protect fiduciaries who must act under the trust’s terms. When trustees face ambiguities or conflicting interpretations, a court order authorizing specific actions can prevent future claims of mismanagement. A petition is also appropriate when informal agreements are unreachable or when beneficiaries have legitimate concerns that require judicial resolution. In these circumstances, a court-approved modification creates a binding resolution that guides future administration and minimizes the potential for prolonged disputes or costly litigation down the road.
Common circumstances include changes in family status, like births, deaths, or divorces; transfers or sales of major assets that alter the trust’s asset mix; discovery of drafting mistakes or misstatements in the original document; and shifts in tax or retirement laws that affect distribution strategies. Additional factors may include the grantor’s later statements indicating a different intent, beneficiary incapacity concerns, or a trustee’s need for clear authority to perform administrative tasks. Each situation requires careful evaluation to determine whether a petition is warranted and how to frame the request for judicial approval.
When beneficiaries’ lives change through marriage, divorce, death, or the birth of children, trust provisions that once made sense may no longer align with the grantor’s wishes or present-day realities. These life events can alter needs and priorities, making it appropriate to seek a modification that addresses new responsibilities, adjusts distributions, or clarifies contingent interests. A properly constructed petition explains how the proposed change reflects the grantor’s intent and the practical needs of beneficiaries under current circumstances.
Errors or ambiguous language in the original trust document can create confusion for trustees and disagreements among beneficiaries about meaning and intent. Whether stemming from typographical errors, unclear descriptions of assets, or conflicting clauses, these issues can undermine consistent administration. A petition to modify the trust can correct those provisions, offer clear instructions for trustees to follow, and reduce the likelihood of disputes. The petition should include evidence demonstrating the intended meaning and the reason the correction is necessary.
Major asset transfers, the sale of real property, or changes in tax law can alter the optimal structure for trust distributions and administration. Trust terms created under different financial realities may produce unintended tax consequences or fail to protect assets effectively. Filing a modification petition allows the court to authorize changes that align the trust with current financial circumstances and tax planning goals, ensuring that beneficiaries receive intended benefits and that trustees have the authority needed to manage the trust in the most prudent manner possible.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman assist clients in Vandenberg Village and Santa Barbara County with trust modification petitions and related estate planning services. We are available to review trust documents, advise on the best legal approach, prepare and file petitions, and represent clients at hearings if necessary. Our goal is to provide practical guidance that clarifies options, protects beneficiaries’ interests, and helps trustees follow lawful procedures when implementing approved changes. Contact our office to discuss your situation and learn the steps involved in seeking a modification.
Choosing representation from the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman offers personalized attention to the unique facts of your trust matter. We take time to review documents and listen to client goals, explaining procedural requirements, probable timelines, and potential outcomes. Our approach emphasizes thorough preparation of petitions and supporting evidence so the court can evaluate requests efficiently. That preparation helps minimize surprises during hearings and supports practical resolutions that align with the grantor’s probable intent and beneficiaries’ legitimate interests.
Clients benefit from clear communication about filing requirements, notice procedures, and documentation that courts expect in Santa Barbara County. We help assemble records, draft proposed language, and coordinate service to interested parties to ensure the process moves forward smoothly. When disputes arise, we work to resolve matters through negotiation and mediation when appropriate, and we are prepared to present a focused case in court if judicial intervention is necessary to secure a durable solution that allows proper trust administration to proceed.
We are available to assist with related estate planning needs that often accompany trust modifications, such as updating pour-over wills, powers of attorney, health care directives, and trust certifications. Coordinating these documents ensures that changes to the trust fit within a broader estate plan and reduce inconsistencies that can cause problems later. Our office provides guidance on administrative steps following court approval so trustees understand their duties and beneficiaries understand how distributions will be handled under the revised terms.
Our process begins with a thorough review of the trust and related documents to identify the issues that warrant modification. We then outline options, prepare a petition with proposed amended language, and coordinate service on beneficiaries and other interested parties in accordance with local rules. We aim to resolve matters through negotiation when possible, and we prepare a clear evidentiary record for court presentations when necessary. Following court approval we assist with implementing the order, updating trust records, and advising trustees on next steps so the modified trust can be administered effectively.
The initial assessment involves collecting the original trust, any existing amendments, related estate planning documents, and records relevant to the requested change. We review financial statements, property deeds, beneficiary designations, and any communications that bear on the grantor’s intent. This stage identifies procedural deadlines, potential notice obligations, and legal theories to support the petition. Clear understanding at the outset enables efficient drafting of the petition and helps determine whether a negotiated resolution is feasible or if formal court action is necessary.
Collecting all relevant records is critical to establish context for the requested modification. Documents may include the trust instrument, amendments, property deeds, account statements, tax returns, and correspondence that illuminates the grantor’s intentions. These materials provide the factual foundation for the petition and help anticipate beneficiary responses. A complete record supports well-reasoned proposed amendments and strengthens the position presented to the court by demonstrating the practical need and legal basis for the requested change.
Once records are collected, we evaluate the legal grounds for modification under California law and consider options such as informal amendment, petition for judicial modification, or settlement negotiations. This analysis includes assessing the likely responses of beneficiaries, potential procedural hurdles, and the type of evidence the court will require. With this understanding, we can recommend a strategy aimed at achieving the client’s goals while minimizing costs, delays, and the risk of contentious litigation whenever feasible.
In the drafting stage we prepare a petition that lays out the factual background, legal basis for modification, and the precise language we ask the court to adopt. The packet typically includes declarations, exhibits, a proposed order, and proof of service forms. Attention to detail ensures the filing complies with local court rules in Santa Barbara County and provides interested parties with clear notice of the request. Properly drafted petitions increase the likelihood of efficient processing and favorable consideration by the court.
Supporting declarations explain why the modification is necessary, present relevant facts, and authenticate documents attached as exhibits. Declarations may include statements from trustees, beneficiaries, or others with direct knowledge of the circumstances prompting change. Exhibits such as trust pages, correspondence, and financial records help the court evaluate the petition. Well-structured supporting material allows the judge to see the context for the request and understand how the proposed amendments align with the grantor’s intent and the best interests of beneficiaries.
After filing the petition, it is essential to serve notice on beneficiaries and other interested parties in accordance with California procedures. Proper service establishes the court’s jurisdiction over those parties and provides an opportunity for responses or objections. The notice should be clear about the requested changes and include instructions about responding or appearing at any scheduled hearing. Documenting timely and accurate service is a critical step that helps prevent procedural challenges and ensures the court can proceed with evaluating the petition on its merits.
After filing and service, the court process may involve a response period, potential settlement negotiations, and a hearing if objections are raised. At the hearing the judge reviews evidence, hears argument, and decides whether to approve, modify, or deny the proposed changes. If the court approves the petition, it issues an order and often a signed amended trust or instructions for the trustee to implement the modification. We assist clients with carrying out the court’s order, updating trust records, and advising trustees on compliance with the new terms.
Many contested matters can be resolved through negotiation or mediation prior to a hearing. These alternative dispute resolution methods allow parties to reach a mutually acceptable resolution that can then be submitted to the court for approval. Mediation can save time and costs while preserving relationships among family members. When settlement is possible, we help draft settlement agreements and proposed amendments that reflect the terms of resolution and are suitable for court review and acceptance.
If the matter proceeds to a hearing, we present the factual and legal basis for the requested modification and respond to any objections raised by beneficiaries. The judge then issues an order based on the record. Once a final order is entered, we assist with preparing the documents the court requires for implementation, updating trust records, and guiding trustees through any new administrative steps. Ensuring proper implementation is essential to preserve the benefits of the modification and prevent further disputes.
A trust modification petition is a formal request filed in probate or superior court asking the judge to approve specific changes to an existing trust. Petitioners typically explain why the original trust no longer reflects the grantor’s intent or has become impractical due to changed circumstances, errors, or newly discovered facts. The petition sets out the proposed revised language and supporting facts, and it gives beneficiaries an opportunity to review and respond. Filing a petition creates a clear, enforceable court order if approved, which reduces uncertainty in administration and limits the potential for future disputes. People use this process when informal amendment is not possible or when beneficiaries disagree about the changes. A petition is also appropriate when the grantor is deceased or incapacitated and the parties need judicial authorization to implement substantive modifications. Because courts evaluate proposed changes for fairness and consistency with the grantor’s probable intent, the petition should include detailed documentation and well-drafted proposed amendments to improve the likelihood of favorable review.
Notice to beneficiaries and other interested parties is a required part of the petition process in California. After filing, petitioners must serve documents in accordance with statutory rules, which often include personal service or mail depending on the party and their location. Proof of service forms must be filed with the court to demonstrate compliance. Proper notice ensures that beneficiaries have an opportunity to respond or object and that the court’s order will be binding on all interested persons once entered. In practice, timely and accurate notice can sometimes lead to negotiated solutions without a contested hearing. Early communication about the reasons for modification and proposed language can encourage constructive discussions. When objections arise, the court will consider the responses during its review, and evidence of good faith notice and outreach may influence the court’s appreciation of the petition’s reasonableness and the parties’ efforts to reach agreement.
Yes, trusts can be modified after the grantor becomes incapacitated or after the grantor’s death, but the legal basis and procedures differ. If the grantor is incapacitated, parties may seek a judicial modification based on changed circumstances or to correct errors that prevent proper administration. When the grantor is deceased, beneficiaries or trustees may petition the court to modify trust terms to carry out the grantor’s probable intent or to adapt the trust to new realities, provided the request aligns with statutory standards and respects beneficiaries’ rights. In both scenarios courts require adequate documentation and legal justification for changes because the grantor cannot directly confirm the modification. The petition should include evidence such as prior statements of intent, related documents, and factual explanations showing why the requested amendment reflects the grantor’s likely wishes or is necessary to address current conditions in a way consistent with the trust’s original purpose.
Courts consider several types of evidence when reviewing a trust modification petition, including the trust instrument itself, prior amendments, correspondence, financial records, and declarations from witnesses with first-hand knowledge. The judge evaluates whether the proposed change aligns with the grantor’s probable intent, whether beneficiaries’ rights are fairly considered, and whether the amendment is legally permissible under California law. Clear, organized documentation that explains the factual basis for modification increases the petition’s persuasiveness and helps the court reach a well-reasoned decision. Evidence of the grantor’s later statements or actions can be particularly persuasive if it illustrates a shift in intent that the original trust did not reflect. Courts also examine practical consequences for beneficiaries and trustee administration to ensure that the requested change is administrable and equitable. Showing how the amendment will be implemented and its effect on distributions helps the court evaluate whether to approve the petition.
The duration of a trust modification petition can vary depending on the complexity of the requested changes, the number of interested parties, and whether objections arise. Simple, uncontested petitions with clear proposed language and cooperative beneficiaries can move through filing and approval in a matter of weeks to a few months. Contested matters, or those requiring additional evidence, mediation, or multiple court appearances, can extend the process considerably and may take several months to over a year depending on court schedules and the need for discovery or hearings. Timely preparation, accurate service, and prompt responses to procedural requirements help keep the matter moving. Engaging in early communication with beneficiaries and exploring settlement or mediation can shorten timelines as well. Courts strive to resolve petitions efficiently, but differences among parties and the need for thorough review of evidence may lengthen the timeline in contested cases.
Trustees generally should not implement changes that materially alter beneficiary rights or trustee powers without court authorization if the trust does not clearly permit such actions. Doing so can expose trustees to claims that they acted outside their authority. When a proposed change affects distributions, contingent interests, or fiduciary duties, trustees typically seek judicial approval to ensure the action is lawful and to limit potential liability. Even when trustees believe a change is appropriate, obtaining a court order provides a safer path for significant amendments. For minor administrative clarifications that fall within existing trustee powers, trustees may proceed without court involvement if the trust language clearly authorizes such actions. However, when in doubt trustees should seek legal guidance to determine whether a petition is necessary. Proper documentation of the decision-making process and a conservative approach to major changes help protect trustees and beneficiaries alike from future disputes.
Alternatives to filing a petition include negotiating an informal amendment with the agreement of all beneficiaries, entering into a settlement agreement that resolves disputes, or using mediation to reach a consensual resolution. Informal amendments can be an efficient route when everyone agrees and the trust allows nonjudicial changes. Mediation can preserve relationships and yield a tailored solution that the court can later formalize if necessary. These alternatives can save time and expense compared with contested litigation when parties are willing to cooperate. However, alternatives are not always available, particularly when beneficiaries disagree or when legal clarity is needed to resolve ambiguities. In such cases a petition provides a definitive, enforceable resolution. Consulting with counsel helps determine whether negotiation, mediation, or filing a petition is the most appropriate option given the facts and the interests of all parties involved.
A court-ordered modification of a trust can affect other estate planning documents, especially if those documents coordinate with the trust through pour-over provisions, powers of attorney, or beneficiary designations. It is important to review related documents to ensure consistency after a modification. For example, changes to distribution language or trustee powers may suggest accompanying updates to wills, health care directives, or financial powers to align with the revised trust terms and avoid conflicts during administration. Following court approval, clients should review their entire estate plan to confirm that all documents function together as intended. We assist clients in identifying and making necessary adjustments to related instruments so the overall plan reflects current wishes and legal standing. Coordinating these updates reduces confusion and streamlines future estate administration.
Costs for filing a trust modification petition vary widely based on the case complexity, the need for negotiations or discovery, and whether a hearing becomes necessary. Fees typically include court filing costs, service expenses, and legal fees for preparation, drafting, and representation. Simple uncontested matters involve lower costs because they require less time and fewer court appearances, while contested cases with multiple parties and evidentiary hearings will incur higher fees due to increased attorney time and administrative expenses. Providing a thorough initial assessment helps estimate likely costs and identify opportunities to reduce expenses through negotiation or limited scope filings. We discuss anticipated fees, filing costs, and possible alternatives during the initial consultation so clients understand potential financial commitments and can make informed decisions about pursuing a petition or exploring other resolution paths.
After the court approves a trust modification petition, the court issues an order and, when appropriate, directs that the trust be reformed or amended according to the approved language. Parties must implement the order, which often includes updating trust records, distributing assets per new terms, and adjusting trustee powers if the amendment changed administrative responsibilities. Trustees should document the implementation steps and maintain records demonstrating compliance with the court’s order to protect against future challenges. We assist clients with post-approval matters such as preparing the trustee with necessary documentation, updating beneficiary records, modifying related estate planning instruments, and advising on tax or administrative obligations that arise from the change. Proper follow-through ensures the benefits of the court-approved modification are realized and that the trust operates under the intended new terms without unnecessary delay.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas