At the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman in San Jose, we assist Buena Vista residents with preparing and executing General Assignment of Assets to Trust documents. A general assignment moves ownership of certain assets into a living trust or clarifies that assets intended for the trust are effectively assigned when formal retitling is impractical. This service is valuable for individuals who want to ensure a smooth transfer of property to a trust upon incapacity or death. Our approach emphasizes clear documentation and careful review of each asset to avoid unintended tax, creditor, or probate complications.
A General Assignment of Assets to Trust can be a practical tool for consolidating an estate plan and supporting a revocable living trust or related instruments like a pour-over will. Whether the assets are bank accounts, investment accounts, vehicle registrations, or intangible property, a properly drafted assignment clarifies intent and supports the trust’s administration without requiring immediate retitling in every case. We help clients evaluate which assets are appropriate for assignment, coordinate with trustees and financial institutions when necessary, and prepare documents that reflect the client’s overall estate planning goals while complying with California law.
A General Assignment of Assets to Trust provides legal clarity and continuity for an estate plan by showing that certain assets are intended to be treated as trust property. This can reduce ambiguity for successor trustees and personal representatives, and can help avoid disputes during trust administration. In many cases, it complements a revocable living trust and pour-over will by supplying a document that trustees can present to financial institutions or courts to demonstrate the settlor’s intent. The assignment can also simplify the estate process by reducing the need for immediate retitling while protecting the trust’s beneficiary designations and distribution plan.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman offers focused estate planning services for individuals and families across Santa Clara County, including Buena Vista and greater San Jose. Our firm assists clients with trust formation, wills, powers of attorney, advance health care directives, and asset assignments tailored to California law. We work closely with clients to document their intentions clearly and to design plans that address family dynamics, tax considerations, and potential future incapacity. Communication, careful document drafting, and practical solutions guide our work to help clients maintain control of their assets and plan for an orderly transition.
A General Assignment of Assets to Trust is a written instrument that declares certain items belong to a trust or should be considered trust property. This device is commonly used when retitling each asset into the trust is impractical or when assets are intangible or pending transfer. The assignment clarifies the grantor’s intent and supports trust administration by creating a paper trail. In California, the document must be clear, signed, and properly integrated with the settlor’s other estate planning documents so trustees, financial institutions, and courts can rely upon the declared assignment in handling distributions and account management.
Although a general assignment does not substitute for proper titling in all situations, it can be an effective backup that helps prevent probate and supports the trust’s operation. The assignment may reference the governing trust, list categories of assets, and specify terms for transfer. It can be used alongside a pour-over will to capture assets that were not retitled during life. A careful review is necessary to ensure the assignment does not conflict with beneficiary designations, retirement accounts, or joint ownership arrangements that may require different handling under California law.
A General Assignment is a formal declaration by a grantor that certain property is to be treated as belonging to a trust, whether immediately or upon certain events. It typically identifies the trust by name and date, states the grantor’s intent, and describes the categories of property being assigned. The document may be used to assign physical property, financial accounts, or intangible rights that are not yet titled to the trust. While an assignment can establish intent and support trust administration, it should be drafted to avoid conflicts with existing account agreements, transfer restrictions, or creditor claims.
Drafting a General Assignment of Assets to Trust involves identifying the trust, describing the assets or categories being assigned, and articulating the conditions of transfer. The document should include the grantor’s signature, date, and, when appropriate, notarization for acceptance by third parties. Additional steps may include coordinating with financial institutions, verifying beneficiary designations, and updating related estate planning documents such as wills, powers of attorney, and health care directives. A careful process reduces the chance of administrative delays and aligns the assignment with tax, creditor, and family considerations that affect the trust’s administration.
Understanding the terminology used in trust and assignment documents helps clients make informed decisions. Common terms include settlor, trustee, beneficiary, grantor, pour-over will, and revocable living trust. Each term carries a specific legal meaning and affects how assets are handled during life and after death. Familiarity with these concepts can streamline communication with trustees, institutions, and family members. A clear glossary paired with practical explanations ensures that clients know how their documents interact, how assignments impact titling and control, and what to expect during trust administration under California law.
The settlor or grantor is the individual who creates the trust and transfers assets into it or declares intent that assets belong to the trust. This person sets the terms of the trust, names trustees and beneficiaries, and can retain certain powers over the trust during their lifetime. Understanding the settlor’s role clarifies who has the authority to direct trust assets, make amendments to a revocable living trust, and execute assignments. Proper documentation of the settlor’s intent helps ensure that successors and institutions follow the intended distribution and administration plan.
A trustee is the individual or entity responsible for managing the trust assets according to the trust document’s terms and in the best interests of the beneficiaries. Duties of a trustee include collecting and protecting assets, making distributions, maintaining records, and communicating with beneficiaries. When a general assignment is in place, the trustee relies on that documentation to determine whether particular assets should be treated as trust property. Choosing a trustee who can handle administrative tasks and follow legal requirements helps the trust operate as intended and supports orderly transitions during incapacity or after death.
A beneficiary is a person or organization entitled to receive benefits from the trust according to the trust’s terms. Beneficiaries may have present interests or contingent future interests depending on the distribution schedule. The general assignment affects beneficiaries by clarifying which assets are subject to the trust’s distribution plan. Clear beneficiary designations and coordination with the assignment help avoid ambiguous claims and disputes. It is important that beneficiaries understand the nature of the trust, their rights to information about trust administration, and any conditions that affect distributions under California law.
A pour-over will is a companion document to a living trust that directs any assets not already held by the trust at death to be transferred or poured into the trust. The pour-over will ensures assets not retitled during life are captured by the trust, though probate may be required to transfer certain property. When paired with a General Assignment of Assets to Trust, the pour-over will functions as a safety net, helping to preserve the settlor’s intent. Reviewing both documents together helps minimize probate exposure and supports a cohesive estate plan.
When planning transfers, clients can choose between retitling assets directly into a trust, using beneficiary designations, joint ownership arrangements, or relying on an assignment instrument. Each method has trade-offs in terms of administrative burden, potential probate avoidance, tax implications, and creditor exposure. Direct retitling provides immediate clarity, while beneficiary designations and joint ownership may bypass probate but carry other risks. A general assignment can work as a practical alternative or supplement, particularly for assets difficult to retitle promptly. Evaluating these options in the context of a client’s broader plan helps determine the best path forward.
Some assets have low value or are cumbersome to retitle, such as small personal items, private membership rights, or legacy accounts with complex transfer rules. In these cases, a general assignment can document the settlor’s intention to include those items in the trust without the immediate need for formal retitling. This approach minimizes administrative burden while still creating a clear record that trustees can rely upon. It is important to review the nature of each asset and any contractual or legal restrictions to ensure an assignment will be effective for the intended purposes under California law.
Retitling certain accounts or property may trigger fees, tax reporting changes, or loss of beneficial terms. For example, transfer of certain investment accounts or titles can alter account status or create administrative burdens that outweigh the benefits of immediate retitling. In such situations, a general assignment documents the settlor’s intent without forcing immediate changes that could have downside effects. The assignment serves as a bridge until retitling becomes practical or until the trust needs to assert ownership, reducing disruption while preserving the estate plan’s integrity.
For estates with varied asset types, including real property, retirement accounts, business interests, and life insurance, a comprehensive review ensures assignments and titling align with the overall plan. Complex ownership structures, pending litigation, or creditor concerns require coordinated planning to prevent unintended tax consequences or probate exposure. A thorough legal review helps integrate a general assignment with trust provisions, beneficiary designations, and other estate documents, creating a cohesive strategy that reflects the client’s objectives and adapts to intricate family or financial circumstances in California.
When family dynamics, blended families, or significant tax planning are factors, a more detailed approach is often required. Assignments and trust terms should account for equitable distribution goals, potential creditor claims, and tax implications of transferring assets. Proper coordination with retirement accounts, life insurance, and property transfers helps avoid disputes and ensures beneficiaries receive the intended benefits. A comprehensive review provides the opportunity to align gifting strategies, charitable goals, and succession plans to help preserve family relationships and financial outcomes while complying with applicable California regulations.
A comprehensive approach ensures that assignments, titling, beneficiary designations, and trust provisions work together to achieve the settlor’s goals. This coordination reduces the risk of accidental disinheritance, conflicting documents, or assets falling into probate. By reviewing all documents and asset records, potential issues can be identified and addressed in advance, such as inconsistent beneficiary designations or accounts overlooked during initial planning. The result is a smoother administration process for trustees and a clearer path for beneficiaries, which helps reduce stress and uncertainty during estate settlement.
Comprehensive planning also helps protect assets from avoidable costs and delays by anticipating administrative steps needed at incapacity or death. Proper alignment of documents can minimize tax exposure and support orderly transitions without unnecessary court involvement. Additionally, unified planning facilitates communication with financial institutions and family members, clarifies roles and expectations, and establishes durable mechanisms for handling unexpected events. This proactive orientation helps ensure that the settlor’s wishes are respected and that the trust serves its intended purpose effectively under California law.
Consistency is essential to prevent conflicting instructions between wills, trusts, beneficiary forms, and assignments. A comprehensive strategy aligns these instruments so that they reinforce each other rather than create uncertainty. When documents are written and reviewed together, trustees and institutions can follow a clear plan, reducing the time and expense associated with resolving discrepancies. Careful drafting and cross-references between the trust, the pour-over will, and a general assignment reduce the likelihood of contested interpretations and facilitate a more predictable administration for beneficiaries.
A coordinated set of documents and a documented assignment can speed up trust administration by giving trustees clear evidence of the settlor’s intent and the assets subject to the trust. Administrative efficiency lowers legal and administrative expenses and reduces friction among beneficiaries. By proactively addressing common problem areas—such as retirement account designations, jointly held property, and tangible personal property—clients can help prevent disputes and streamline the distribution process. That proactive work can make a significant difference in how smoothly an estate plan operates when it is needed most.
Begin by creating a detailed inventory of all assets, including account numbers, titles, and ownership arrangements. Categorize items as bank accounts, investment accounts, real property, vehicles, business interests, personal property, and intangible assets. This inventory helps determine which assets require retitling, which can be assigned, and which are governed by beneficiary designations. A clear inventory prevents surprises and supports accurate drafting of a general assignment. Regular updates to the inventory maintain alignment with financial changes over time and assist trustees if the assignment needs to be enforced.
Communicate with trustees, successor fiduciaries, and relevant financial institutions about the anticipated assignment process. Some institutions will accept a properly executed general assignment, while others may ask for formal retitling or additional documentation. Early coordination clarifies expectations and uncovers any institutional hurdles that should be addressed in advance. Providing trustees with a clear copy of the trust, the assignment, and related documents helps them act promptly when the time comes to manage or distribute assets, and reduces the administrative friction that can occur when documents are incomplete or inconsistent.
A general assignment can provide a practical method for capturing assets within a trust without immediate retitling, offering a clear expression of intent for trustees and financial institutions. It is especially helpful when assets are difficult to transfer, when retitling could create adverse tax or administrative effects, or when a settlor prefers to minimize paperwork during life. By documenting the intention to include certain assets in the trust, the assignment supports cohesive estate administration and can serve as a useful companion to a pour-over will and other estate planning documents.
Clients often choose an assignment as part of a broader estate plan because it balances practicality with clarity. It reduces the risk that assets will be overlooked or unintentionally pass outside the trust. The assignment also helps successor trustees understand which assets the settlor intended to be governed by trust terms, easing administration and reducing disputes. When used thoughtfully alongside retitling and beneficiary updates, the assignment contributes to a more reliable and manageable estate plan tailored to the client’s personal and financial circumstances in California.
Assignments are commonly used when property is hard to retitle, when accounts have restrictions, or when a settlor prefers not to change ownership during life. They are also useful for consolidating small or forgotten accounts, addressing tangible personal property distributed by list, and supporting transfer of intangible assets. Assignments can protect the settlor’s intent where joint ownership or beneficiary designations create ambiguity. Reviewing each circumstance in the context of beneficiary forms and contractual arrangements ensures the assignment will have the intended effect under California law.
Certain assets are administratively difficult to retitle, such as small or legacy accounts, collectibles with unclear documentation, or accounts held by institutions with strict transfer rules. A general assignment provides a clear statement of intent that helps trustees and institutions recognize the settlor’s wishes without immediate retitling. This approach streamlines planning while preserving the settlor’s control over assets during their lifetime. It should be combined with a thorough inventory and periodic review to ensure the assignment remains accurate and effective as financial circumstances change.
Some accounts include terms that limit or complicate transfers, such as retirement plans or contractual rights that require beneficiary designations. Using an assignment allows the settlor to document intent for assets that cannot be retitled easily without altering their legal status or incurring penalties. The assignment clarifies expectations for successors while preserving the account’s operating terms. It is important to coordinate assignments with beneficiary updates and to understand institutional rules so that the assignment complements existing agreements rather than conflicting with them.
Some clients prefer to limit the administrative tasks associated with retitling numerous accounts or property items during life. A general assignment reduces the immediate workload by documenting intent for inclusion in the trust without requiring detailed retitling for every asset. This can be particularly helpful for clients managing complex lives with limited time or for older individuals seeking a simpler planning path. Periodic reviews can ensure the assignment remains aligned with the client’s wishes, and targeted retitling can be undertaken for high-value or sensitive accounts as needed.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman supports Buena Vista residents with tailored estate planning services, including drafting General Assignments of Assets to Trust, revocable living trusts, pour-over wills, and related documentation. We provide practical guidance on asset inventories, beneficiary designations, and coordinating with institutions to effect transfers when necessary. Our office strives to make the process understandable and manageable, offering clear drafting and careful review to help clients preserve their intentions and facilitate efficient trust administration under California law.
Our firm focuses on helping clients create coherent and workable estate plans that incorporate trusts, assignments, and supporting documents. We prioritize clear communication and detailed document preparation to make sure assignments reflect the client’s intended outcome. Through careful review of asset records and beneficiary forms, we seek to minimize conflicts and align the assignment with the broader trust structure. Our goal is to provide practical, reliable documents that assist trustees and reduce administrative uncertainty at a sensitive time.
We also assist clients in coordinating with financial institutions and successor fiduciaries to ensure the assignment and trust documents are recognized and can be implemented smoothly. This includes advising on potential retitling needs, reviewing account agreements, and preparing supporting documentation trustees may need during administration. By addressing procedural details up front, we aim to reduce delays and administrative expenses for families and beneficiaries when trust assets must be managed or distributed.
Clients receive personalized attention to their circumstances, whether the need is to capture smaller assets, prevent unintended probate, or coordinate a large and complex estate plan. We help craft documents that reflect the client’s values and goals, and we provide clear instructions to trustees and family members about how assets should be handled. Our practice emphasizes thoughtful planning, thorough documentation, and practical steps to preserve the settlor’s intentions under California law.
Our process begins with an initial review of the client’s existing estate planning documents and a complete asset inventory. We assess which assets should be assigned, which require retitling, and whether beneficiary designations need updating. Next, we draft a General Assignment of Assets to Trust tailored to the client’s trust document and goals, and we coordinate with institutions as needed. Finally, we deliver signed and executed documents with instructions for trustees and trustees’ successors, and schedule follow-up reviews to ensure the plan remains current as circumstances change.
The initial step involves collecting all estate planning documents, account statements, property deeds, and beneficiary forms. We review the trust, will, powers of attorney, and any existing assignments to understand the client’s intentions. This stage identifies assets that are already titled to the trust, items that require retitling, and those best addressed through a general assignment. A thorough review helps prevent conflicts and ensures the assignment complements the overall plan, setting the stage for accurate and effective drafting of the necessary documents.
We assist clients in compiling a comprehensive inventory of accounts, real property, vehicles, business interests, and tangible personal property. Categorizing assets clarifies which items are best handled through retitling, beneficiary updates, or assignment. This inventory also reveals any accounts governed by contractual beneficiary designations or joint ownership arrangements that may require special handling. A detailed inventory helps ensure the general assignment is targeted and effective, reducing the chance that assets will be overlooked during administration.
We closely examine existing estate documents to identify inconsistencies or conflicts among wills, trusts, beneficiary forms, and previously executed assignments. Addressing discrepancies early prevents administrative confusion and potential disputes among beneficiaries. When conflicts are found, we recommend amendments or clarifying language so that the assignment and trust work together harmoniously. Clear documentation at this phase reduces the risk of contested interpretations and facilitates easier implementation by trustees and institutions.
Once assets are identified and documents reviewed, we draft a General Assignment tailored to the trust and the client’s objectives. The assignment will clearly identify the trust, describe the categories of assets involved, and state the settlor’s intent. When necessary, we prepare certificates of trust, pour-over wills, and coordination letters for financial institutions. Drafting focuses on clarity and practical acceptance by third parties while avoiding language that could create conflicts with existing account agreements or beneficiary designations.
The assignment is drafted to reference the trust by name and date, and to enumerate specific assets or categories of property. It includes the grantor’s signature and any required acknowledgements or notarization. We also cross-reference related documents such as the trust, pour-over will, and powers of attorney, so trustees and institutions can find all pertinent materials. Cross-references strengthen the assignment’s utility and reduce confusion when fiduciaries must present documentation to banks or title companies.
Financial institutions and title companies may request certificates of trust, letters of instruction, or additional forms before accepting assets as trust property. We prepare the necessary supporting paperwork and, when appropriate, liaise with institutions to confirm their requirements. Providing well-organized documentation increases the likelihood that the assignment will be accepted without the need for immediate retitling. This step anticipates administrative hurdles and helps trustees implement the settlor’s intent with minimal delay.
After drafting, we guide clients through signing and, if needed, notarization of the assignment and supporting documents. We deliver executed copies to trustees and retain records for future reference. Where institutions require additional steps, we assist with submission or follow-up communications. Finally, we recommend periodic reviews to ensure the assignment remains aligned with changing asset holdings or family circumstances. Regular check-ins help preserve the operation of the trust and the effectiveness of the assignment over time.
Execution typically requires the grantor’s signature and may call for notarization depending on institutional preferences. We provide clear instructions for distribution of signed copies to trustees, successor fiduciaries, and designated family members as appropriate. Ensuring the right parties have access to these documents supports timely action when the trust must be administered. Safe storage of originals and accessible copies reduces the risk of delays and helps trustees locate necessary materials when managing the estate.
Life changes such as new assets, marital status changes, or alterations in family circumstances may require updates to assignments and related documents. We recommend periodic reviews to confirm that beneficiary designations, account agreements, and the assignment remain aligned with the trust and the settlor’s intentions. Proactive follow-up helps avoid unexpected probate exposure or disputes and keeps the estate plan current and effective under California law. We offer ongoing support for updates and for addressing questions that may arise over time.
A General Assignment of Assets to Trust is a written statement that certain assets should be treated as belonging to a trust, either immediately or upon the occurrence of a specified event. It identifies the trust, describes asset categories, and expresses the grantor’s intent for trustees to manage or distribute those assets under the trust’s terms. This document is particularly useful when retitling each asset is impractical or when an asset’s formal title cannot be changed easily during the grantor’s lifetime. You should consider an assignment when assets are small, difficult to retitle, or when retitling could produce adverse administrative effects. It can work alongside a pour-over will and revocable living trust as part of a cohesive estate plan. However, because some accounts are governed by beneficiary designations or contractual terms, an assignment may not be sufficient in every case; a careful review ensures the assignment is appropriate and effective.
A general assignment can help prevent probate for assets that are effectively transferred to the trust and are accepted as trust property by institutions or handled by a trustee. When the assignment is clear and institutions recognize it, those assets may be administered under the trust without probate. However, not all assets will be covered automatically, and some items—such as accounts with beneficiary designations or jointly held property—may pass outside the trust despite an assignment. To reduce probate exposure, the assignment should be coordinated with retitling where needed and with updating beneficiary designations. Using a pour-over will as a safety net can capture assets not already in the trust, but the will may still require probate to be effective. A combined strategy and regular document reviews help maximize the likelihood that assets will transfer as intended.
Beneficiary designations and retirement accounts are typically governed by contract and federal rules that can supersede trust documents. For accounts like 401(k)s or IRAs, the named beneficiary on the account controls who receives the funds, regardless of a general assignment. As a result, ensuring beneficiary forms match the estate plan is essential when such accounts are part of the overall strategy. An assignment can clarify intent for other types of assets, but it should be used in concert with updating beneficiary designations and account agreements. Reviewing each retirement and insurance account prevents conflicting directions and helps ensure distributions align with the settlor’s wishes. Coordinated planning reduces confusion and helps trustees administer assets more smoothly.
Acceptance of a general assignment by financial institutions varies. Some banks and title companies will accept a properly executed assignment along with a trust certificate and supporting documentation, while others prefer formal retitling of accounts into the trust’s name. Institutional policies, account terms, and the type of asset influence the approach institutions require before recognizing the trust’s ownership. Because of this variation, it is important to identify institutional requirements early and prepare any additional documentation they may request. In some cases, retitling high-value accounts may be prudent, while a general assignment serves to record intent for other items. Effective planning includes communicating with institutions to confirm acceptable procedures for transferring or recognizing trust ownership.
Many types of property can be assigned to a trust, but the process depends on the asset type. Real estate and vehicles typically require title changes recorded with the county or motor vehicle department, while personal property and intangible assets can often be assigned by written instrument. A general assignment may document intent for certain items, but formal retitling is often the most reliable way to ensure clear trust ownership for property that requires public records. When assigning real estate or vehicles, recording deeds or transferring titles may be necessary to avoid disputes or tax complications. We review each asset type and advise on where an assignment is sufficient and where retitling or recording is advisable. Proper handling reduces the risk of administrative problems and supports the trust’s intended distributions.
Using an assignment instead of immediate retitling can simplify life for the grantor and reduce administrative friction, but it has potential drawbacks. Assignments may not be recognized by all institutions, and certain assets governed by contractual beneficiary designations or joint ownership rules may not transfer according to the assignment. This can lead to unexpected probate or disputes among beneficiaries if documents are not aligned correctly. To mitigate these risks, a combined approach is often best: use assignments for practical coverage where appropriate, update beneficiary forms for accounts governed by contract, and retitle high-value assets that require public record. Periodic reviews and clear documentation help ensure the assignment supports the estate plan effectively.
A general assignment declares that certain assets should be treated as trust property, while a pour-over will directs any property left outside the trust at death to be transferred into the trust through probate. The assignment is typically a non-probate instrument reflecting current intent, whereas the pour-over will operates at death and may require probate to move assets into the trust if they were not previously retitled. Both tools can complement each other: the assignment helps document intent during life, and the pour-over will acts as a safety net for missed assets. Using both together, along with clear beneficiary designations and targeted retitling when necessary, provides a more complete strategy for ensuring assets are governed by the trust.
Notarization is often advisable for a general assignment, especially if third parties or financial institutions require it for acceptance. While not all assignments must be notarized to be effective between the parties, notarization can increase the likelihood that institutions will accept the document without requiring further evidentiary steps. Recording is generally limited to real property; an assignment concerning real estate should be executed as a deed and recorded in the county recorder’s office when appropriate. For other asset types, notarization and a certificate of trust can help trustees demonstrate the trust’s existence and the grantor’s authority to assign assets. We advise clients on whether notarization or additional steps are needed based on the asset types and institutional requirements to maximize the assignment’s practical effectiveness.
Reviewing and updating an assignment and trust documents is recommended after major life events such as marriage, divorce, births, deaths, significant changes in assets, or relocations. Even absent major events, a periodic review every few years helps ensure beneficiary designations remain current and that the assignment accurately reflects assets and the settlor’s intentions. Regular reviews prevent assets from being overlooked and help keep the estate plan aligned with changing laws and circumstances. During reviews, we check account statements, beneficiary forms, property titles, and any contractual agreements bearing on transfers. This proactive maintenance helps reduce the risk of unintended probate, inconsistent instructions, or institutional refusal to accept trust documentation. Keeping documents current supports smoother administration when the trust becomes operative.
To begin creating a general assignment, start by assembling existing estate planning documents and an inventory of assets. Identify accounts already titled to the trust, those with beneficiary designations, jointly held property, and items that may be difficult to retitle. This inventory informs which assets should be addressed by assignment and which require retitling or beneficiary updates. Next, consult with a qualified attorney who can draft an assignment tailored to the trust and the owner’s objectives, prepare any supporting documents such as certificates of trust, and coordinate with institutions when necessary. A careful assessment and clear documentation at the outset reduce the likelihood of disputes and increase the likelihood that the assignment will function as intended.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas