If you are considering changes to an existing trust in Burbank or Santa Clara County, a trust modification petition may be the appropriate legal step. This guide explains what a trust modification petition involves, common reasons clients request changes, and how the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman can assist with the process. We work with clients to review trust terms, evaluate beneficiaries’ interests, and prepare the documents and filings required to present a petition in probate court when necessary. Our goal is to help you pursue a smooth, legally sound modification while protecting your intentions and family relationships.
Trust modification petitions are often needed when circumstances change after a trust is created. Life events such as marriage, divorce, the birth of a child, changes in health, relocation, or updated tax considerations can lead trustees or beneficiaries to seek amendments through the courts. In some cases a trust includes procedures for amendment outside court, but other situations require a formal petition to ensure the modification is legally effective. We provide clear explanations about options, prepare petitions and supporting affidavits, and represent clients in court to pursue stable, enforceable outcomes that align with donor intent and current family and financial realities.
A properly handled trust modification petition can prevent disputes, clarify beneficiaries’ rights, and address unexpected developments that the original trust did not foresee. Petitioning the court can provide legal recognition of changes to trust terms, resolve ambiguities, and allow adjustments that reflect current family relationships or asset distributions. This service is particularly beneficial where parties disagree about the validity of proposed modifications or when the trust creator is unavailable to sign amendments. By pursuing a petition, clients gain formal judicial approval that can reduce future litigation and help trustees act with greater confidence in managing trust assets for the benefit of intended beneficiaries.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman in San Jose serves clients across California with estate planning and trust administration matters, including trust modification petitions. Our attorneys bring extensive courtroom and transactional experience handling petitions to modify, reform, or construe trusts. We guide trustees, beneficiaries, and interested parties from initial assessment through court filings and hearings, preparing declarations, documentation, and legal arguments to support requested changes. Our approach is client-centered, focusing on clear communication, practical solutions, and protecting each client’s legal rights while pursuing outcomes that honor the trust maker’s intentions and adapt to changed circumstances.
A trust modification petition is a court action that requests judicial approval for changes to the terms, administration, or interpretation of a trust. The petition will typically set out the reasons for the modification, identify the trust instrument and parties, and explain how the requested change aligns with applicable law and the trust maker’s intent. Courts may grant petitions for a variety of reasons, including correcting mistakes in the trust document, addressing changed facts that make original terms impractical, or resolving disputes over interpretation. Careful fact-gathering and legal analysis are essential before filing to assess the likelihood of a favorable ruling.
Not all trust changes require court intervention; some trusts include provisions that allow trustees or the trust maker to amend terms without litigation. However, when parties disagree, when the trust maker is incapacitated or deceased, or when formal judicial recognition is needed to ensure enforceability, a petition can be the appropriate course. The petition process involves drafting pleadings, serving interested parties, potentially negotiating with beneficiaries, and presenting evidence in court. Seeking legal guidance early helps clarify options, timelines, and the documentation needed to support a modification petition effectively.
A trust modification petition is a legal request submitted to probate court asking for authorization to change or clarify trust provisions. The petition identifies the trust instrument and its relevant terms, explains the reasons for the proposed change, and requests a specific court order. Reasons for a petition can include fixing drafting errors, updating trust provisions to reflect changes in law, addressing changes in beneficiaries’ circumstances, or resolving disagreements among stakeholders. The court evaluates the petition against statutory requirements and the trust maker’s intent, weighing any objections raised by interested parties before deciding whether to grant the requested relief.
Successful petition preparation requires meticulous attention to the trust document, supporting evidence, and procedural rules. Key elements include a clear identification of the trust, factual declarations showing why modification is warranted, copies of relevant trust provisions, and legal arguments grounded in California trust and probate law. The process also involves serving notice on trustees, beneficiaries, and other interested parties, allowing them to respond. Court hearings may be required if objections arise. Adequate documentation, clear legal reasoning, and thoughtful negotiation when appropriate increase the chance of obtaining a court order that implements the intended changes while minimizing friction among parties.
Understanding common legal terms helps clients follow the petition process and participate meaningfully in decisions. This glossary covers terms you are likely to encounter, such as ‘trust instrument’, ‘trustee’, ‘beneficiary’, ‘decanting’, and ‘judicial modification’. Each term is described in plain language to show how it affects petition strategies and outcomes. Clear terminology also helps in gathering the right documentary evidence and in preparing declarations and pleadings that present a persuasive case to the court. Familiarity with these terms makes the process more transparent and reduces uncertainty for trustees and beneficiaries.
A trust instrument is the written document that creates the trust and sets out its terms, including the identity of the trust maker, trustees, beneficiaries, and the distribution scheme for trust assets. When preparing a modification petition, the trust instrument is the foundational piece of evidence; the court will closely examine its language to determine the trust maker’s intent and whether the requested change is consistent with those intentions. Copies of the instrument and any amendments should be attached to the petition. Accurate interpretation of the instrument is essential to crafting persuasive legal arguments in support of a modification.
Decanting is the process by which a trustee transfers assets from an existing trust into a new trust with different terms, where state law permits such transfers. Decanting can be a practical alternative to court petitions in certain circumstances because it allows trustees to change administrative or distribution provisions without formal court involvement, provided statutory requirements are met. However, decanting has limitations and may not be appropriate when the trustee lacks authority or when there are conflicts among beneficiaries. A petition may still be needed when court approval is necessary to protect the rights of interested parties or resolve disputes.
Judicial reformation is a court-ordered correction of a trust document where the written terms do not reflect the trust maker’s actual intent due to a mistake or ambiguity. Under California law, a court may reform a trust when clear and convincing evidence shows that the donor’s intent differed from the document’s language. Petitions for reformation require careful factual proof, such as drafts, communications, or other evidence showing the intended terms. Reformation can be a powerful remedy to align legal documents with what the trust maker actually intended when creating the trust.
An interested party is any person or entity with a legally recognized stake in a trust’s administration or distribution, including trustees, beneficiaries, remainder beneficiaries, and creditors with claims against the trust. Courts require that interested parties be notified of petitions affecting trust terms so they have the opportunity to object or appear. Identifying all interested parties early in the process is important to prevent procedural challenges or claims of inadequate notice that could delay or undermine a petition. Proper service and documentation show the court that all parties have been given an opportunity to be heard.
When seeking changes to a trust, clients may choose between filing a judicial petition or pursuing nonjudicial methods such as amendment by the trust maker, trustee action under decanting statutes, or negotiated agreements among beneficiaries. Court petitions provide formal judicial authority and can resolve disputes or clarify ambiguous terms, but they involve litigation steps, notices, and potential hearings. Nonjudicial methods can be quicker and less adversarial when parties agree or when trustees have clear authority. Evaluating the merits of each path depends on the trust’s language, the interests of parties involved, and the need for enforceable court orders to protect rights and ensure clear implementation.
If the trust maker is alive and retains the power to amend or revoke the trust, executing a formal amendment or restatement is often the most direct and effective route to change terms. In these situations the trust maker can explicitly update beneficiaries, modify distribution schedules, or alter trustee powers without court involvement. Clear execution formalities and updating related documents such as pour-over wills, powers of attorney, and health care directives ensure consistency across the estate plan. Legal guidance is still helpful to ensure formalities are observed and that new provisions accomplish the trust maker’s objectives.
When all interested parties agree on proposed changes, they can often accomplish modifications through written consents or settlement agreements that document the new terms and waive objections. Such negotiated solutions can preserve family relationships, reduce costs, and expedite implementation. Agreements should be carefully drafted to ensure they are enforceable and that they address related issues such as tax treatment, creditor claims, and trustee duties. Even with consent, it is important to verify that any nonjudicial change complies with the trust instrument and applicable law to avoid unintended consequences later.
If beneficiaries disagree about the meaning of trust provisions or the propriety of proposed changes, filing a trust modification petition can be necessary to obtain a definitive judicial ruling. The court can evaluate competing claims, consider evidence of the trust maker’s intent, and issue an order that resolves disputes and provides direction for trustees. Engaging counsel to prepare the petition and present the case ensures that factual evidence is organized and legal arguments are presented clearly, increasing the likelihood that the court will issue a durable resolution that reduces future contestation among parties.
Ambiguous, inconsistent, or poorly drafted trust provisions can make it difficult for trustees to act without fear of liability. In such circumstances, a petition asking the court for interpretation, reformation, or modification can provide authoritative guidance. The court’s ruling clarifies the trust maker’s intent and supplies legal direction for trustees and beneficiaries. Preparing a persuasive petition requires careful analysis of the trust instrument, supporting evidence such as drafts or communications, and legal authority to show why a revision or interpretation is appropriate in light of the trust maker’s probable intent.
A comprehensive, court-backed modification brings legal certainty and enforceability that nonjudicial changes may lack, especially where competing interests exist. With a judicial order, trustees can act knowing that the court has sanctioned the change, which reduces the risk of future litigation from dissatisfied beneficiaries or third parties. Court involvement can also address complex factual and legal issues, such as correcting mistakes, handling contested changes, and resolving creditor claims, ensuring that the resulting trust administration reflects both the trust maker’s intentions and applicable law.
A full-service approach includes investigation, negotiation, drafting, and court representation to achieve a legally sound modification. This methodical process helps preserve estate plan integrity, protect fiduciary decision-making, and provide documented findings that demonstrate good faith actions by trustees. While litigation can require more time and resources than a private agreement, the long-term benefits of a clear, enforceable resolution often outweigh the short-term costs when trust terms affect substantial assets or when disagreements risk ongoing conflict among family members or other interested parties.
When a court approves a modification, trustees gain confidence that their actions comply with legal requirements and the court’s order, which can shield them from claims of breach of duty. This legal certainty is especially valuable when trustees must make distributions, manage investments, or adjust beneficiary rights in ways that could otherwise prompt objections. Preparation for court includes assembling evidence of the trust maker’s intent and demonstrating that the modification serves the trust’s purpose, all of which supports trustees in fulfilling their obligations with reduced exposure to litigation risk.
Securing a judicial order to modify a trust resolves disputes in a binding way and establishes a framework for long-term administration that beneficiaries and trustees can rely on. Court-ordered modifications reduce the likelihood of repeated challenges and create a clear record of the rationale behind changes. This stability promotes smoother trust administration, lowers the chance of future litigation, and helps preserve family relationships by providing an impartial resolution when parties cannot otherwise agree on the appropriate course of action.
Gathering all relevant documents at the outset is essential to a successful petition. This should include the original trust instrument and any amendments, related estate planning documents like wills and powers of attorney, correspondence that reflects the trust maker’s intent, financial records related to trust assets, and any prior court orders that affect the trust. Well-organized documentation helps identify issues, supports factual claims, and streamlines preparation of pleadings and declarations. Preparing a thorough record from the beginning reduces delays and strengthens the legal foundation for the requested modification in court.
Where feasible, attempt to resolve differences through negotiation or mediation before filing a petition. Parties who engage in constructive dialogue may reach agreements that avoid the time and expense of court proceedings. Mediation can help clarify misunderstandings, surface shared objectives, and produce creative solutions that a court order might not provide. Nevertheless, when negotiations fail or when a binding judicial determination is needed to protect rights, filing a petition is an appropriate next step. Legal guidance can help determine whether negotiation or court action better serves long-term goals.
Clients commonly seek trust modification petitions when the original trust fails to address changed family circumstances, contains drafting errors, or becomes unworkable due to changes in tax law or asset composition. Situations such as remarriage, the birth of grandchildren, the incapacity of a trustee, or the emergence of creditor claims can all require legal intervention to adjust trust terms. Pursuing a petition provides a formal mechanism to update or correct the trust in a way that the court can enforce, which is particularly important when private amendments are impossible or contested.
Another common reason to seek a judicial modification is when the trust maker’s intent is unclear and parties disagree about interpretation. A petition can ask the court to construe ambiguous provisions or to reform the document when evidence shows the written language does not match the trust maker’s intentions. Petitioning also helps manage trustee concerns about liability by obtaining explicit court approval for proposed actions. For families facing sensitive transitions, a court-ordered modification can establish a clear path forward and reduce the likelihood of later disputes that disrupt trust administration.
Typical circumstances that prompt trust modification petitions include the need to correct drafting mistakes, address changes in family structure, respond to the trust maker’s incapacity or death, or adapt to changes in asset ownership such as acquisition or sale of significant property. Disputes among beneficiaries about distribution, trustee removal or replacement, and the interpretation of unclear provisions also frequently lead to petitions. Recognizing these circumstances early and engaging legal support can help manage expectations and guide the parties toward an orderly resolution that protects trust administration and beneficiary interests.
Drafting errors or ambiguous language can render trust provisions unclear or inconsistent with the trust maker’s intentions. In such cases a petition asking the court to interpret or reform the document can correct unintended results that would otherwise cause disputes or improper distributions. Evidence such as earlier drafts, correspondence with counsel, or contemporaneous notes can be used to show what the trust maker intended. The court’s intervention provides an authoritative correction that helps trustees perform their duties and reduces the risk of future challenges from beneficiaries or creditors.
Changes in family dynamics such as marriage, divorce, births, or deaths may make original trust provisions outdated or unfair to current beneficiaries. A petition can update distribution schedules, modify fiduciary duties, or clarify who should serve as trustee. These modifications help ensure that the trust continues to serve its intended protective and distributional purposes. Where family members disagree about the appropriate changes, court approval can produce a binding resolution that balances competing interests while reflecting the trust maker’s overall objectives.
When a trustee becomes unable or unwilling to serve, or when trustees and beneficiaries are in conflict over administration, a petition may be necessary to appoint a successor trustee, authorize specific actions, or modify trustee powers to address practical management needs. Courts can provide orders that remove or replace trustees, clarify powers, and resolve disputes about distributions. These interventions help preserve trust assets and enable continuity of management, ensuring that the trust continues to operate in accordance with legal requirements and the trust maker’s wishes.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provides representation and guidance for trust modification petitions in Burbank, San Jose, and throughout California. We assist trustees, beneficiaries, and other interested parties with case assessment, document preparation, service of process, and court appearances when needed. Our team works to explain options and likely outcomes candidly, helping clients choose between negotiation, nonjudicial alternatives, or filing a petition. We also coordinate with financial advisors and tax professionals when changes could affect estate tax or income tax consequences, aiming for predictable and durable results.
Clients turn to our firm because we combine deep knowledge of California trust and probate law with practical courtroom experience. We assist in assessing the legal and factual basis for petitions, preparing thorough supporting evidence, and communicating with interested parties to explore resolution options. Our priority is to provide attentive service, clear guidance, and thoughtful representation so clients can navigate the petition process with confidence. We place particular emphasis on protecting the trust maker’s intent and helping trustees act responsibly while advancing beneficiaries’ legitimate interests.
Our representation includes careful drafting of petitions and declarations, compliance with procedural and notice requirements, and preparation for hearings when objections arise. We explain the likely timeline and costs, help manage expectations, and pursue efficient solutions that aim to limit unnecessary litigation. Whether the matter can be resolved through negotiation or requires a full court hearing, our team prepares thoroughly to present factual evidence and legal arguments that support the requested modification, and to protect clients from avoidable procedural missteps.
We also assist clients by coordinating with other professionals such as accountants, financial planners, and trustees to ensure that any proposed changes are implemented comprehensively. This collaborative approach helps align trust modifications with broader estate planning goals, tax considerations, and practical administration needs. Our office is available to discuss the unique facts of each case and to design a strategy that seeks a stable and enforceable outcome. Contact us by phone or through our office to schedule an initial consultation about your trust modification needs.
Our process begins with a detailed intake to understand the trust document, the parties involved, and the reason for the requested change. We then review relevant documents, advise on likely avenues such as amendment, decanting, or petitioning the court, and recommend the best path forward. If a petition is appropriate, we prepare pleadings, gather supporting affidavits and evidence, serve interested parties, and attempt settlement discussions when feasible. If the matter proceeds to hearing, we represent clients at court and help implement the court’s order into trust administration and distribution plans.
Initial evaluation focuses on reviewing the trust instrument, any amendments, and related estate planning documents to determine whether a petition is necessary and what relief should be requested. We assess potential procedural obstacles such as notice requirements and identify interested parties. This step also includes collecting evidence such as drafts, correspondence, or records that illuminate the trust maker’s intent. A thorough document review at the outset helps identify disputes, clarify legal theories, and forecast likely outcomes, allowing clients to make informed decisions about pursuing a petition or alternative solutions.
Collecting the right evidence is essential for a persuasive petition. This may include earlier drafts of the trust, emails or letters that reflect the trust maker’s intentions, financial records showing asset history, and declarations from witnesses who can attest to relevant facts. Organizing this evidence into clear exhibits helps the court understand the factual context behind the requested modification. Properly prepared evidence can be the difference between a successful petition and unresolved conflict, so we emphasize careful documentation and corroboration during this early phase.
We identify all individuals and entities with legal interests in the trust and ensure they receive proper notice of the petition as required by California law. This may include current trustees, beneficiaries, successor trustees, and creditors with known claims. Proper service is vital to preserve the court’s jurisdiction and to prevent objections based on inadequate notice. Early notification also opens the possibility of negotiations or mediation that can resolve disputes without a contested hearing, which often benefits family relationships and reduces the overall cost and time associated with litigation.
Once the factual and legal basis for modification is established, we draft a petition that sets out the relief sought and attaches supporting documents and declarations. The petition explains the reasons for the requested modification, cites relevant California statutory and case law, and details the notice provided to interested parties. After filing the petition with the appropriate probate court, we coordinate service and handle any initial procedural matters, including setting hearings and responding to preliminary objections or requests for additional information from the court or opposing counsel.
Declarations accompany the petition to present factual evidence supporting the requested modification, including witness statements, documentary proof, and financial records. Exhibits such as the trust instrument, amendments, and relevant correspondence should be clearly labeled and referenced. Detailed, well-organized declarations help judges evaluate the merits of the petition and understand the reasons for modification. We work closely with clients to prepare accurate, persuasive declarations that reflect firsthand knowledge and objective documentation tied directly to the legal issues at hand.
After filing, the petition must be properly served on interested parties and the case scheduled for a hearing if necessary. We handle the procedural steps required by the court, including proof of service, responses to opposition filings, and requests for continuances when appropriate. Timely and correct filings help avoid delays and preserve clients’ rights. In many cases we also engage in settlement discussions or mediation while the case is pending to explore resolution options that reduce time in court and cost to the parties.
If a hearing is required, we present the petition, evidence, and legal arguments to the judge, address objections from interested parties, and respond to procedural questions. After the court issues an order, we assist with implementing the changes, which can include drafting conforming trust documents, updating beneficiary notices, and coordinating with financial institutions to reflect the court-approved modifications. Ensuring that the court’s order is properly entered and executed helps finalize the trust administration and provides the legal certainty necessary for trustees to continue managing assets.
At the hearing we explain the factual basis for the requested modification and present supporting evidence and legal authority showing why the court should grant relief. This may involve direct testimony, documentary evidence, and oral argument addressing objections. The hearing provides an opportunity to resolve factual disputes and persuade the court that the requested modification aligns with the trust maker’s intent and applicable law. Thorough preparation and clear presentation of evidence are central to achieving a favorable judicial resolution.
Following a court order, we assist clients with drafting any required conforming documents, notifying financial institutions or custodians of the changes, and advising trustees on revised duties and distribution steps. Proper implementation ensures the court’s decision translates into effective administration and minimizes the risk of later disputes. Documentation of the order and its integration into trust records also helps provide a transparent trail showing that changes were authorized and executed under the court’s supervision.
A trust modification petition is typically required when the trust maker is no longer able to make amendments, when beneficiaries or trustees disagree about proposed changes, or when the trust instrument contains ambiguities or errors that demand judicial interpretation or reformation. Courts also become involved when statutory procedures for trustee-initiated changes are unavailable or insufficient to address the requested relief. In such cases filing a petition provides a formal avenue to obtain an enforceable court order that clarifies rights and obligations. Before filing, we evaluate whether nonjudicial paths such as a trust maker’s amendment, trustee decanting, or negotiated settlement are feasible. When those options are not available or when their use would risk later challenges, a petition offers the most certain legal remedy. Proper documentation and clear legal arguments increase the likelihood of a favorable ruling in probate court.
The time to resolve a trust modification petition varies depending on case complexity, the level of opposition from interested parties, and court schedules. Uncontested matters that proceed smoothly may be resolved in a few months, while contested cases or those requiring extensive discovery and multiple hearings can take significantly longer. Procedural steps such as service, waiting periods, and setting hearing dates all influence the timeline. Engaging counsel early to organize evidence, handle procedural requirements, and pursue settlement options can shorten the process. Effective preparation and communication often reduce delays and help move the matter to resolution more efficiently than attempting to navigate the process without legal guidance.
Trustees can sometimes make changes without court approval if the trust instrument grants them specific powers or if state decanting statutes allow it. Such nonjudicial changes are possible when trustees act within their legal authority and when beneficiaries consent where required. However, trustees must carefully verify their authority before proceeding, because acting beyond permitted powers can expose them to liability from beneficiaries or other interested parties. When authority is unclear or beneficiaries object, court intervention may be the safer route to secure a binding modification. A petition offers a clear judicial determination that protects trustees and provides finality for all parties involved.
Courts consider a range of evidence when deciding petitions to reform or interpret a trust, including the trust document and amendments, prior drafts, correspondence that reflects the trust maker’s intent, testimony from witnesses with firsthand knowledge, and financial records showing how assets were intended to be managed. The court evaluates whether a mistake or ambiguity exists and whether presented evidence supports the requested relief under governing legal standards. Clear, credible documentary evidence and coherent witness statements strengthen a petition. Establishing a consistent narrative that ties factual documentation to the legal grounds for modification increases the likelihood that the court will grant the requested relief.
A trust modification petition can have implications for tax treatment and creditor rights depending on the changes requested. Certain modifications may affect estate or income tax consequences, while other changes could influence the ability of creditors to reach trust assets. Courts and advisors consider these impacts when proposing or approving modifications to ensure changes do not unintentionally create adverse tax liabilities or expose assets to claims. Coordinating with tax and financial advisors during the modification process helps clients understand the potential consequences and plan accordingly. Addressing tax and creditor issues early reduces the risk of unexpected outcomes after the court’s order is implemented.
Beneficiaries, trustees, and other interested parties must be given proper notice of a trust modification petition under California law so they have the opportunity to respond. Notice procedures include serving copies of the petition and related documents within statutory timeframes and filing proofs of service with the court. Ensuring correct service helps the court obtain jurisdiction over the matter and prevents procedural objections that could delay or invalidate proceedings. Our office manages service requirements, prepares the necessary proof filings, and advises clients on responding to inquiries or objections from notified parties. Timely and accurate notice supports the integrity of the petition process and promotes fair participation by all interested stakeholders.
When an interested party objects to a proposed modification, the court will consider the objection and the evidence supporting both positions. Objections may lead to additional written responses, discovery to clarify disputed facts, settlement discussions, or an evidentiary hearing where the judge evaluates witness testimony and documentary proof. The court’s role is to ensure that any modification aligns with applicable law and, where possible, the trust maker’s intent. Even with objections, many matters resolve short of a contested trial through negotiation or mediation. When resolution is not possible, presenting a well-documented petition and persuasive legal argument at hearing increases the chance of a favorable judicial ruling despite opposition.
Modifications involving beneficiaries with special needs require careful planning to preserve eligibility for government benefits while meeting the beneficiary’s needs. Courts and trustees must consider how changes to distributions or management provisions impact means-tested public benefits. Crafting language that provides supplemental benefits without jeopardizing benefits eligibility is commonly addressed through specialized trust provisions and careful coordination with benefit advisors. When changes affect a special needs beneficiary, legal counsel works with financial and benefits advisors to propose modifications that support the beneficiary’s welfare while maintaining necessary protections. A petition can formalize these protective measures and ensure the court understands and approves the intended safeguards for the beneficiary.
Alternatives to filing a petition include negotiating a settlement among interested parties, using trustee powers such as decanting where authorized by the trust and law, or obtaining consents and waivers from beneficiaries to implement changes. These nonjudicial paths can be faster and less adversarial when parties are cooperative. Mediation is often a productive tool to resolve disagreements and reach a mutually acceptable solution that avoids court involvement. However, if parties cannot reach agreement or if statutory authority is lacking, filing a petition remains the most reliable way to obtain a binding modification. Counsel can help assess the viability of alternatives and recommend whether pursuing negotiation or a petition better serves long-term goals.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman assists clients at every stage of a trust modification petition, from initial assessment through drafting pleadings, gathering evidence, serving interested parties, and representing clients in court hearings. We help evaluate alternatives, coordinate with financial and tax professionals, and prepare the factual and legal arguments needed to support a requested modification. Our role includes advising trustees on duties and steps to implement court orders to ensure compliance after a ruling. We also focus on clear communication with clients, explaining procedural steps, likely timelines, and potential outcomes so they can make informed decisions. If you are considering a trust modification, scheduling a consultation allows us to review your documents and recommend the best path forward tailored to your circumstances.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas