A Heggstad petition can be a pivotal tool when estate planning documentation does not reflect current asset ownership or when assets remain outside a trust despite intentions otherwise. Residents of Communications Hill and the broader San Jose area often encounter situations where property titles, beneficiary designations, or retirement accounts are not fully aligned with a revocable living trust. This introductory section explains why a Heggstad petition may be needed, how it interacts with trust administration, and what outcomes it can produce. We describe the typical scenarios that lead people to consider a petition and outline the procedural framework that governs filing one in Santa Clara County courts.
Understanding the Heggstad petition process starts with recognizing common estate planning gaps, such as assets unintentionally left outside a trust or transfers made without clear documentation. This paragraph offers practical context for homeowners, account holders, and family decision-makers in Communications Hill who may be facing probate exposure or confusion about title ownership. We discuss how resolving these gaps can simplify estate settlement, protect beneficiaries’ interests, and preserve the original intent behind a trust. The goal here is to give readers a realistic sense of what filing a Heggstad petition entails and how it can bridge administrative gaps in a trust-based plan.
A Heggstad petition is important because it helps align the legal record with the trust creator’s intent, especially when assets were never properly transferred to a trust or when clerical errors have left property outside trust control. Filing a petition can avoid formal probate proceedings, clarify title and ownership for real estate, and streamline distribution to beneficiaries. For families in San Jose, addressing these issues promptly can reduce delay, legal expense, and conflict among heirs. The petition process also provides the court with a mechanism to recognize trust ownership where informal transfers or omissions occurred, preserving asset continuity and honoring the settlor’s plan.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman, based in San Jose and serving Communications Hill and the surrounding Santa Clara County communities, focuses on estate planning matters including trusts, wills, and trust administration petitions such as Heggstad filings. Our practice guides clients through drafting and trust-administration tasks while advising on practical steps to ensure assets are titled in accordance with estate plans. We handle matters ranging from residential real estate transfers to specialty trust arrangements like special needs trusts and irrevocable life insurance trusts. Clients may call 408-528-2827 to discuss how a petition could apply to their circumstances and move forward with appropriate court filings.
A Heggstad petition is a legal filing used to ask the court to recognize that certain assets are the settlor’s property of the trust, even if formal transfer documents are incomplete or absent. This can happen when real property was intended to be held by a trust but the deed never changed, or when assets were transferred informally. The petition provides a judicial remedy to confirm trust ownership, which helps avoid probate and clarifies title for beneficiaries. In practice, the petition must show evidence of intent, relevant transfer documents when available, and reasons why the court should deem the assets part of the trust.
Filing a petition requires careful preparation of documentation, informed legal argument, and adherence to local court procedures. In Santa Clara County, timelines, required notices to heirs and creditors, and the evidence that supports a finding of trust ownership will affect the outcome. Parties often present deeds, trust instruments, correspondence, and witness statements to support the petition. The process aims to produce a clear court order that resolves title questions and enables trustees to administer trust assets without the delay and expense of probate, improving certainty for those named to inherit or manage assets.
A Heggstad petition asks the probate court to recognize that particular asset transfers or holdings should be treated as trust property for purposes of administration and distribution. The court evaluates whether the settlor intended the asset to be part of the trust and whether sufficient evidence exists to treat it as such. This procedure is used when formalities were not completed, such as a deed not recorded in the trust’s name, or when transfers were informal but consistent with the trust creator’s plan. The outcome typically results in an order confirming trust ownership for specific assets, allowing trustees to manage and distribute them consistently with the trust.
A successful petition typically requires clear evidence of the settlor’s intention, documentation showing the relationship between the asset and the trust, and proper service on interested parties. Supporting materials can include the trust instrument, deeds, account statements, and communications that demonstrate the settlor’s plan. Procedural steps include drafting the petition, filing with the appropriate probate court, providing notice to heirs and interested parties, and attending any required hearings. The court then reviews the evidence and issues an order that resolves title or ownership issues, enabling trustees to proceed with administration without the need for a full probate estate process.
This glossary clarifies common terms you will encounter during a Heggstad petition: settlor, trustee, beneficiary, deed, probate, title, and trust administration. Understanding these terms helps you follow court pleadings and determine what documentation may be relevant. It also guides communication with professionals and family members when preparing a petition. Clear definitions reduce confusion and help ensure that petitions are supported with the right evidence. The glossary below explains these concepts in plain language and highlights why each matters when seeking court recognition of assets as part of a trust.
The settlor, sometimes called the grantor, is the person who created the trust and transferred assets into it or intended to do so. Determining the settlor’s intent is central to a Heggstad petition because the court looks to evidence of what the settlor wanted when deciding whether to treat an asset as trust property. Evidence can include the trust document, deeds, beneficiary designations, and communications that indicate how the settlor managed or intended to manage the asset. Clear indication of the settlor’s plan can be decisive in securing a court order that recognizes trust ownership over specific property.
A trustee is the person or entity responsible for managing trust assets and carrying out the terms of the trust. When a Heggstad petition is granted, trustees gain the authority to take possession of assets recognized as part of the trust and to manage them in accordance with the trust’s instructions. The court’s order clarifies the trustee’s power over previously ambiguous assets, allowing for transfer, sale, or distribution as the trust directs. Trustees must act in the best interest of beneficiaries and follow the trust terms as interpreted by the court order resolving the ownership question.
A deed is the formal document used to transfer real property, and title refers to the legal ownership reflected in public records. When deeds are never updated to show trust ownership, a Heggstad petition can ask the court to recognize trust ownership despite missing or mismatched record entries. The court evaluates the circumstances of transfer and the settlor’s intent. Clarifying title via a petition helps avoid future disputes, establish clear ownership for sale or financing, and ensure that property is distributed according to the trust rather than through probate proceedings.
Probate is the court-supervised process for distributing assets of someone who died with assets in their individual name, while trust administration typically avoids probate when assets are properly titled in a trust. A Heggstad petition seeks to bring certain assets into the trust administration process by having the probate court recognize the trust owner’s intent. If the court grants the petition, those assets are administered under the trust’s terms and typically avoid the more time-consuming probate formalities. This distinction often saves time, expense, and public exposure of estate matters.
When an asset’s ownership is unclear after a settlor’s passing, options include filing a Heggstad petition, opening a probate case, or exploring administrative alternatives like transfer-on-death designations. Each path has trade-offs. Probate may be required for assets outside a trust and can be lengthy and public. A petition aims to avoid probate by showing that assets belong to the trust despite technical defects. Administrative alternatives may resolve some assets without court involvement but are not always available. Choosing the right approach depends on the asset type, available evidence, and the urgency of administration for beneficiaries.
Some assets, such as bank accounts or brokerage accounts with beneficiary designations, may transfer outside of probate without a full petition if documentation is current and clearly names a trust or beneficiary. When title issues involve routine paperwork that financial institutions will accept, the parties may be able to resolve matters through institution-level processes, requiring less court involvement. This pathway can be faster and less expensive, but it depends on the institution’s policies and the clarity of documentation. If records are ambiguous or the institution refuses to effect a transfer, a petition may be necessary to secure a formal court ruling.
When a deed, assignment, or other transfer document is readily available and the recorder’s office will accept it for processing, the asset may be retitled without court action. For example, a straightforward deed that was signed but not recorded may sometimes be recorded to show trust ownership. This avoids the time and expense of litigation. However, the parties must be confident in the validity of the paperwork and the absence of competing claims. If any uncertainty exists about the settlor’s intent or possible objections from heirs, filing a petition may still be the safer course.
Complex situations involving multiple properties, retirement accounts, or mixed title evidence often require a comprehensive legal approach to ensure assets are properly recognized as part of a trust. When records conflict, or when transfers were partially completed, court intervention through a Heggstad petition can resolve disputes and provide finality. A thorough legal review helps identify necessary documents, determine required notices, and prepare persuasive filings that address potential objections. This reduces the risk of delayed distributions and prevents inconsistent outcomes that could undermine the trust creator’s intentions.
When there is disagreement among family members or potential heirs about ownership or intent, a comprehensive legal strategy including a petition provides a neutral court determination that resolves disputes. The court’s order can preempt future litigation by clarifying title and establishing the trustee’s authority to manage assets under the trust terms. Addressing disagreements early through a formal petition process reduces emotional strain on families and creates a clear roadmap for distribution, helping preserve relationships and ensuring that the trust’s provisions are carried out with authority and legal clarity.
A comprehensive approach helps ensure that all assets intended for a trust are recognized and administered according to the settlor’s plan. This reduces the risk of inadvertent probate, minimizes delay for beneficiaries, and clarifies trustee authority. Comprehensive review identifies title defects, beneficiary designation mismatches, and defective transfers so that each issue can be addressed proactively. The end result is more predictable estate settlement, reduced likelihood of post-distribution disputes, and a streamlined administration process that aligns with the settlor’s goals while complying with legal requirements.
Comprehensive handling also supports proper documentation and court filings when needed. Preparing a petition with a full evidentiary record increases the chance of a favorable ruling and helps prevent re-litigation. Working through each asset ensures trustees have the authority to take necessary actions such as selling property, transferring accounts, or distributing funds to beneficiaries. It also provides beneficiaries with transparency and a clear legal basis for actions taken during administration, which enhances trust and reduces the possibility of contested outcomes that can be costly and time-consuming.
One of the primary benefits of a comprehensive Heggstad strategy is minimizing or avoiding the probate process for assets that should have been in a trust. Probate can be slow, public, and expensive, potentially reducing the value passed to beneficiaries. By obtaining a court order that confirms trust ownership, trustees can administer these assets directly under the trust’s terms, avoiding probate deadlines and fees. This can speed distributions, lower administrative costs, and keep sensitive family matters out of public court records, giving families greater privacy and efficiency in settling the estate.
A court order confirming trust ownership provides legal certainty, empowering trustees to act confidently in managing and distributing assets. This certainty reduces the risk of disputes or future challenges from heirs who might claim assets were not properly included in the trust. With clear legal authority, trustees can resolve title issues, close accounts, and transfer property as the trust directs. That clarity supports efficient administration and helps beneficiaries understand how and when they will receive property, which can ease tensions and simplify the overall estate settlement process.
Start by collecting all relevant documents, including the trust instrument, original deeds, account statements, beneficiary designations, closing statements, and any correspondence that shows intent to fund the trust. Having a cohesive file helps demonstrate the settlor’s intention and reduces time spent tracking down records. It is also helpful to obtain copies of records from county recorder and financial institutions to corroborate ownership history. Early preparation of a complete evidentiary record strengthens the petition and can shorten court timelines, limiting the possibility of disputes and increasing the chance of a favorable resolution.
Assess potential objections in advance by reviewing who might have an interest in the assets and what arguments they could raise. Prepare evidence that addresses likely concerns, such as proof of intent to fund the trust, signed but unrecorded transfer documents, or consistent account management that aligns with trust directives. Having witness statements or affidavits that corroborate the settlor’s actions can be persuasive in court. Preparation reduces the risk of surprises at hearing and positions the petition for a smoother judicial review process.
Consider a Heggstad petition if assets that should be governed by a trust remain titled in the settlor’s individual name, if deeds or account registrations were not updated, or if there is uncertainty about whether transfers were completed. This service is particularly relevant after the settlor’s passing when trustees or family members discover title defects that could trigger probate. Addressing these issues through a petition helps align the legal record with the trust’s intent and allows trustees to proceed with administration. Early action often prevents delay and preserves estate value for beneficiaries.
You may also consider a petition when property was clearly intended to be part of a trust but informal transfer steps were taken without final recording, or when successor trustees need court confirmation of authority over disputed assets. A petition can resolve conflicting records and produce a clear court order that binds interested parties. The process is valuable for families who want to avoid probate, reduce administrative friction, and ensure that assets are distributed according to the settlor’s documented estate plan rather than default intestacy rules or contested claims.
Typical circumstances include unrecorded deeds for real property that the settlor intended to include in the trust, retirement accounts or brokerage accounts without trust designations, and titles that were not updated after a trust was created. Additional scenarios involve mixed ownership situations, bank accounts still in the settlor’s name, or paperwork that demonstrates intent but lacks formal completion. These issues often surface after the settlor’s death and create obstacles that a petition can address. Identifying the specific barrier to administration is the first step toward a successful court filing.
A frequent circumstance involves real estate where the deed was never recorded in the trust’s name despite the settlor’s intent. This may happen when a trustee or attorney believed a deed had been completed but a recording oversight left the property in the decedent’s individual name. Because public records control title, the discrepancy can expose the property to probate. Filing a petition asks the court to recognize that the property should be treated as trust property based on the settlor’s intent and supporting documents, enabling trustees to manage or transfer the property according to the trust terms.
Financial accounts such as retirement plans, brokerage accounts, or bank accounts sometimes have outdated beneficiary designations or lack instructions to flow into a trust. When such accounts fail to transfer smoothly, administrators may need a legal resolution to align distributions with the trust. A petition provides a path to confirm that the settlor intended the account to be part of the trust. It can also clarify ownership issues when beneficiary forms conflict with the trust instrument, ensuring distributions follow the settlor’s overall estate plan.
Transfers that were started but not completed, or transfers handled informally without official recording, often create uncertainty about ownership. Examples include deeds left unsigned at closing or transfers completed by third parties without appropriate documentation. These partial or informal steps can prevent trustees from administering assets smoothly. A Heggstad petition addresses these gaps by presenting evidence of intent and the circumstances surrounding the transfer, enabling the court to declare the asset part of the trust and allow trustees to proceed with administration consistent with the trust document.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman is available to assist Communications Hill residents with Heggstad petitions and related trust administration matters. We help gather documentation, prepare court filings, coordinate notice to interested parties, and advocate for efficient resolution. Our approach focuses on clear communication, practical solutions, and minimizing disruption to families during administration. If you discover title issues or assets that appear to be outside a trust, contact our San Jose office at 408-528-2827 to discuss next steps and determine whether a judicial petition is appropriate for resolving ownership questions.
Choosing a law firm for a Heggstad petition means selecting a team that understands local probate procedures and the evidentiary standards courts expect. Our firm brings experience handling trust administration matters in Santa Clara County and familiarity with the documentation judges review when considering ownership claims. We assist clients in organizing records and preparing clear petitions that address likely questions from interested parties. This procedural fluency helps move matters forward efficiently and reduces uncertainty for trustees and beneficiaries during the court’s review process.
We prioritize communication and practical outcomes tailored to each family’s situation. That begins with a thorough review of the trust and relevant asset records, followed by a clear plan for proof and required notices. Whether the issue involves residential real estate, retirement accounts, or mixed asset portfolios, we identify the strongest evidence to support recognition of trust ownership. Our goal is to secure sound legal authority for trustees while minimizing delays and costs that could otherwise reduce value for beneficiaries or prolong administration.
As part of our service, we explain the likely timeline, required steps, and potential challenges so clients can make informed decisions. We prepare filings that are consistent with local probate rules and coordinate with the court and other parties to pursue timely resolution. Clients benefit from practical guidance about whether nonjudicial alternatives exist, when a petition is the better path, and how to document and present evidence in a way that supports the trustee’s authority to manage and distribute assets under the trust’s terms.
Our process begins with a thorough intake to identify the assets, confirm the trust document, and gather preliminary evidence supporting a claim that particular property belongs in the trust. We then determine whether a petition or an administrative remedy is appropriate, prepare required notices for interested parties, and draft the petition and supporting declarations. Once filed, we monitor court schedules, respond to inquiries, and represent the trustee at any hearings. Throughout, we keep clients informed and focused on efficient resolution that honors the trust’s terms while complying with local rules and judicial expectations.
The first step involves compiling and reviewing the trust document, title records, deeds, account statements, beneficiary forms, and any communications that show intent to fund the trust. We identify gaps in the record and determine which items will most effectively support a petition. This stage is critical because the strength of the evidentiary record often determines whether court confirmation is likely. We also advise clients on how to obtain missing records from financial institutions, county recorders, or other custodians to build a comprehensive filing.
We identify and gather documents such as the original trust instrument, deeds, closing statements, beneficiary designation forms, and account histories that reflect ownership changes. Gathering the complete record enables us to present a coherent narrative to the court about the settlor’s intent and actions. We also prepare affidavits or declarations from individuals who can corroborate the settlor’s plan, ensuring the petition is supported by both documentary and testimonial evidence when appropriate.
After collecting documents, we evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of the evidence and develop a filing strategy tailored to the court and the facts. This includes deciding which assets to include in the petition, what notices are required, and how to present the record persuasively. The strategy balances thoroughness with efficiency, seeking to resolve title issues while avoiding unnecessary litigation. When needed, we coordinate with title companies or financial institutions to obtain missing records or resolve technical defects.
In this stage we prepare the formal petition and supporting declarations, assemble exhibits, and file the documents with the appropriate probate court. We ensure that required notices to heirs, beneficiaries, and other interested parties are completed according to local rules. Accurate and compliant filing reduces the risk of procedural delays. We also advise trustees about potential responses from interested parties and plan for how to address objections, including preparing supplemental evidence or stipulations when appropriate to facilitate timely resolution.
Preparing the petition involves drafting a clear narrative that ties together the trust document, asset records, and any other evidence of intent. Exhibits such as deeds, account statements, and affidavits are attached to support the factual assertions. The filing must conform to the probate court’s formatting and notice requirements to avoid procedural setbacks. A well-prepared petition frames the issues for the court and helps interested parties understand the basis for recognizing assets as trust property.
After filing, we serve notice to heirs, beneficiaries, and other interested parties as required by statute and local rule. Monitoring responses allows us to quickly address objections or negotiate stipulations that can shorten litigation. When objections arise, we gather additional evidence or propose agreements that preserve the trustee’s authority while resolving disputes. Keeping lines of communication open reduces surprises and can lead to stipulated orders that accomplish the petition’s goals without a contested hearing.
The final step typically involves the court reviewing the petition, any responses, and hearing from interested parties if necessary. The judge evaluates the evidence and issues an order either confirming trust ownership of the specified assets or directing alternative relief. Once the order is entered, trustees can act under its authority to retitle assets, transfer accounts, or distribute property according to the trust. We assist clients in implementing the court order and ensuring that public records and account registrations are updated to reflect the decision.
At any required hearing, we present the evidentiary record and legal arguments that support recognition of the assets as trust property. We respond to questions from the court and address concerns raised by interested parties. The objective is to secure a clear judicial order that leaves no ambiguity about ownership or trustee authority. A successful hearing results in an enforceable directive that guides subsequent administrative steps, such as recording deeds or notifying financial institutions to retitle accounts in the trust’s name.
Following issuance of the court order, we assist with recording deeds, submitting orders to financial institutions, and updating title records so that the trust appears as the recognized owner. This administrative work ensures that the court’s determination is reflected in public records and asset registrations, enabling trustees to manage, sell, or distribute property without further procedural barriers. Completing these steps closes the loop on the petition and helps beneficiaries receive assets according to the trust’s plan.
A Heggstad petition is a probate court filing that asks the court to recognize specific assets as belonging to a trust despite defects in formal transfer paperwork. It is commonly used when deeds were not recorded in the trust’s name, when accounts lack trust designations, or when transfers were informal but consistent with the settlor’s plan. The petition seeks a court order confirming trust ownership so that trustees can administer those assets under the trust. The petition includes supporting documentation and may require notice to heirs and interested parties. The court evaluates evidence of the settlor’s intent along with any relevant documents and testimony. If the court is persuaded that the settlor intended the asset to be part of the trust, it can issue an order recognizing trust ownership. That order allows trustees to retitle property, manage accounts, and distribute assets according to the trust, often avoiding probate for those particular assets.
The timeline for a Heggstad petition in Santa Clara County varies based on factors like the complexity of the record, whether interested parties object, and the court’s docket. A straightforward petition with clear documentation and no objections can move more quickly, often within a few months from filing to order. Gathering and preparing required documents and serving notice to interested parties also takes time and can affect the overall schedule. If objections arise or additional evidence is needed, the process can extend longer as hearings are scheduled and parties present responses. Working proactively to assemble a strong evidentiary record and communicate with potential objectors can speed resolution, while contested matters naturally require more judicial attention and time.
Helpful evidence includes the original trust instrument, deeds, account statements, signed but unrecorded transfer documents, closing statements, and correspondence that shows the settlor intended the asset to be in the trust. Affidavits or declarations from individuals who observed the settlor’s actions or who helped arrange transfers can also strengthen the record. Public records from the county recorder or financial institution statements that show title history are often important exhibits. Organizing these materials into a clear narrative that ties the asset to the trust and explains any inconsistencies is crucial. The court looks for proof of intent and a logical connection between the documentary evidence and the settlor’s plan. The stronger and more coherent the evidence, the more likely the court will grant an order recognizing trust ownership.
A Heggstad petition can help avoid probate for the specific assets it recognizes as belonging to the trust. When the court confirms trust ownership of particular property, those assets are administered under the trust’s terms rather than through probate. However, the petition does not automatically prevent probate for other assets that remain titled in the decedent’s individual name or for matters not addressed by the petition. It is a targeted remedy designed to bring specific assets into trust administration. Because each estate has unique facts, the petition’s reach depends on the evidence presented and the court’s ruling. Comprehensive review of all assets and appropriate filings can reduce the scope of probate by resolving title issues where possible, but some matters may still require separate probate proceedings if they are not addressed by the petition.
Statutes and local rules require that certain interested parties receive notice of a Heggstad petition. Typical recipients include heirs, beneficiaries named in the trust or will, and other parties with potential legal interests in the asset. Proper notice is essential to give those individuals an opportunity to object or to appear at a hearing. Failure to provide required notice can result in procedural delays or the need to re-serve documents. Ensuring accurate notice often involves identifying all potential heirs and beneficiaries and serving them with the petition and supporting materials. Our process includes reviewing family relationships, beneficiary designations, and public records to determine who must be served and then documenting service according to court requirements.
If an heir objects, the court will consider the objection and may schedule a hearing to evaluate competing evidence. Objections can raise issues such as conflicting beneficiary designations, doubt about the settlor’s intent, or claims of improper transfer. At that stage, presenting additional evidence, witness testimony, and legal argument becomes important. The court then decides whether the evidence supports recognizing the asset as part of the trust. Resolving objections may involve negotiation and, where appropriate, stipulations that narrow disputes and allow for agreed orders. When disagreements persist, the court’s hearing determines the outcome based on the evidentiary record and applicable law, and the resulting order governs the asset’s handling going forward.
Alternatives to filing a petition include pursuing administrative transfers with financial institutions, recording deeds when valid instruments exist, or using beneficiary designations and pay-on-death mechanisms when applicable. Sometimes an institution will accept documentation showing intent and retitle an account without court action. These nonjudicial approaches can be faster and less costly, but they depend on the institution’s policies and the clarity of the records. When documentation is incomplete, conflicting, or likely to generate objections, a petition provides a definitive court resolution. Evaluating alternatives requires a careful review of the records and likely responses from institutions and interested parties to determine whether a nonjudicial remedy is realistic or if filing a petition is the safer route.
A clear showing of intent is persuasive, but the court also requires adequate documentary and testimonial support to issue an order recognizing trust ownership. Judges look for a coherent record that connects the asset to the trust and explains why formal transfer steps were not completed. The presence of unambiguous, corroborating evidence increases the likelihood of a favorable ruling, but courts examine each case on its own facts and legal standards. No outcome is guaranteed; judges weigh the strength of the evidence, applicable statutes, and any objections. Preparing a thorough petition that anticipates questions and addresses likely concerns improves the prospect of a successful result, while insufficient proof may lead the court to deny recognition or require additional proceedings.
Costs vary depending on the complexity of the matter, the number of assets involved, court filing fees, and whether the petition is contested. Routine filings with clear documentation and minimal notice issues can be handled at lower cost. When multiple hearings, significant evidence gathering, or objections are involved, expenses increase. Costs can include fees for obtaining records, title searches, and legal time for preparing and responding to filings. We discuss likely costs during an initial consultation and provide a realistic assessment based on the facts. Where possible, we develop strategies to minimize expense while maintaining a strong record. Transparent communication about potential fees helps clients plan for the process and weigh alternatives.
If you suspect an asset in Communications Hill should have been included in a trust but remains titled otherwise, start by gathering the trust document, deeds, account statements, and any paperwork related to the asset. Document any conversations or correspondence that indicate the settlor’s intent. These materials form the basis for assessing whether a petition is appropriate. Contact our San Jose office to schedule a consultation and discuss the documentation you have. We will review the records, explain likely options, and outline a recommended approach for either pursuing a petition or resolving the matter through administrative channels when feasible. Early evaluation helps prevent unnecessary delays and clarifies the best path forward.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas