A Heggstad petition can resolve a common but often stressful problem when assets intended for a trust were not formally retitled before a transferor’s death. At the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman, we help people in Los Altos Hills and throughout Santa Clara County navigate the court process to have assets recognized as trust property. This page explains what a Heggstad petition does, when it may be needed, and how our firm approaches these matters for families working to preserve estate plans and avoid unintended probate delays or disputes over title and beneficiary intent.
When assets remain in the decedent’s name despite clear intent to transfer them to a trust, beneficiaries and trustees may face administrative and legal hurdles. A Heggstad petition asks the court to declare those assets part of the trust as of the date of death, aligning legal title with the decedent’s estate plan. This process can help prevent property from passing through probate and can provide clarity for financial institutions and successor trustees. The information here outlines the petition, likely outcomes, timelines, and how to prepare documentation and witness statements that support a favorable resolution.
A Heggstad petition can be decisive when a decedent intended assets to be trust property but formal title transfer did not occur. Filing the petition clarifies ownership, helps trustees access and manage trust assets, and can prevent unnecessary probate proceedings that would otherwise delay distributions. This remedy is especially important where financial institutions require clear legal authority to release funds or transfer real estate. By pursuing a petition, interested parties seek a legally binding declaration that confirms the trust’s ownership, thereby protecting beneficiaries’ expectations and preserving the decedent’s estate plan while reducing administrative friction.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provides estate planning and trust administration support to families across San Jose, Los Altos Hills, and nearby communities. Our approach to Heggstad petitions emphasizes careful document review, factual development, and clear communication with trustees, beneficiaries, and financial institutions. We focus on practical solutions that align legal outcomes with the decedent’s documented intentions. Clients benefit from accessible guidance through each step of the petition process, including preparing declarations, assembling supporting evidence, and negotiating with opposing parties when necessary to expedite a resolution that serves the trust and its beneficiaries.
A Heggstad petition is a litigation procedure used to establish that certain assets were intended to be held in a trust despite not being formally retitled. The petition typically requires submitting declarations, copies of the trust and will, and any documents showing intent to fund the trust. The court evaluates evidence such as beneficiary statements, drafts of estate planning documents, bank communications, and testimony from persons familiar with the decedent’s intent. This mechanism addresses technical title defects and aligns legal ownership with the estate plan so trustees can manage trust property without protracted disputes or probate intervention.
Not all situations call for a Heggstad petition; however, when improper title prevents a trustee from accessing assets or dispersing trust distributions, a petition may be the most appropriate remedy. The process is fact-specific and may include negotiating with banks, insurance companies, or retirement plan administrators to accept alternative evidence before filing. If informal resolution is not possible, the petition is filed with the probate court and served on interested parties. A favorable court determination establishes ownership as of the decedent’s death, which can streamline trust administration and reduce costs associated with full probate proceedings.
A Heggstad petition seeks a judicial declaration that assets not formally moved into a trust were intended to be trust property when the decedent died. The petition draws on case law and evidence of intent to show the decedent’s probable plan for those assets. Typical evidence includes trust documents, beneficiary designations, communications with advisors or financial institutions, and witness declarations. The court reviews the totality of the evidence to determine whether the assets should be treated as trust property, allowing trustees to administer the trust according to the decedent’s wishes rather than having those assets pass through probate proceedings.
Several elements factor into whether a Heggstad petition will succeed: documentation showing the decedent’s intent to fund the trust, contemporaneous communications or instructions to financial institutions, court-submitted declarations from trustees or witnesses, and any draft deeds or transfer paperwork. The process often begins with gathering all relevant trust paperwork and correspondence, contacting holders of the assets to seek informal acceptance of the trust’s claim, and then preparing declarations and supporting exhibits for the court. A clear, well-documented factual record improves the likelihood that a judge will find in favor of recognizing the trust’s ownership interest.
Understanding the terminology involved in Heggstad petitions helps trustees, beneficiaries, and family members follow the legal process more easily. Common terms include trust funding, petition, declaration, probate, trustee powers, and property title. Review these definitions to better understand how courts evaluate intent and title issues. Being familiar with these terms makes it easier to collect and present evidence, communicate with institutions holding the assets, and recognize what documentation is most persuasive when building a petition that accurately reflects the decedent’s estate plan and intentions regarding asset distribution.
Trust funding refers to the process of transferring assets into a trust so the trust holds legal title and the trustee can manage assets for the beneficiaries. Proper funding may involve changing titles, financial account designations, or beneficiary designations. When funding is incomplete or omitted, a Heggstad petition can address the discrepancy by demonstrating the decedent’s intent that the assets be part of the trust. Proof of funding intent, such as drafts of deeds, bank communications, or a pattern of transfers consistent with the trust plan, helps courts determine the appropriate legal conclusion.
A declaration is a written, sworn statement submitted to the court that explains the factual basis for the petition. Declarations supporting a Heggstad petition often come from the trustee, beneficiaries, witnesses, or professionals who can attest to the decedent’s intent and the circumstances surrounding the transfer or nontransfer of title. Clear declarations that reference documents, conversations, and observable acts provide the judge with essential factual context. Well-prepared declarations tie documentary evidence to the decedent’s plan and help the court assess whether to recognize contested assets as part of the trust.
Probate avoidance describes the goal of keeping assets out of probate and allowing a trust to govern distribution after death. A Heggstad petition supports probate avoidance by asking the court to declare that assets belong to the trust as of the date of death, thereby preventing those assets from being administered through probate. Avoiding probate can reduce delays, limit public disclosure of estate details, and ease administration for beneficiaries. Demonstrating contemporaneous intent and documentary evidence that assets were meant to be in the trust helps the court reach a decision that honors the decedent’s privacy and planning objectives.
Declaration of trust ownership is the court’s order or ruling that confirms certain assets are part of the trust despite lacking formal title changes. Once the court issues this declaration, trustees can manage, sell, or distribute the assets pursuant to the trust’s terms, and third parties are generally required to recognize the judgment. This outcome depends on persuasive evidence and may include recorded deeds, account statements, or written instructions showing the decedent’s intent to fund the trust. The court’s declaration aligns legal title with the decedent’s estate planning goals, facilitating smoother trust administration.
When assets lack formal transfer into a trust, there are several pathways to resolve ownership: negotiating informally with account holders to accept alternative proof of trust ownership, filing a Heggstad petition to seek a judicial declaration, or administering assets through probate. Informal resolution can be quicker and less costly when institutions accept the trust’s evidence, while a Heggstad petition provides a judicial remedy when institutions refuse to cooperate. Probate can be more time-consuming, public, and expensive. Choosing the right path depends on the asset holders’ positions, the strength of documentation showing intent, and the urgency of access to the assets.
A limited approach may be appropriate if banks, title companies, or other institutions are willing to accept documents and sworn statements in lieu of formal retitling. If account holders review trust documents, declarations, and correspondence and determine those materials sufficiently demonstrate the decedent’s intent, they may release funds or retitle accounts without court intervention. This outcome depends on the institution’s policies and willingness to accept alternate evidence. An initial effort to negotiate and present a clear factual record can often avoid more formal proceedings and reduce time and expense for the trust and beneficiaries.
A limited approach can succeed when the facts surrounding the untransferred asset are straightforward and all interested parties agree on the decedent’s intent. If trustee statements, documentation, and beneficiary consent present a consistent narrative, parties holding the asset may be comfortable resolving the matter administratively. This avoids court filings and can speed distribution to beneficiaries. However, if disagreements arise or the institution insists on formal title changes, pursuing a Heggstad petition may become necessary to secure a definitive legal determination and prevent future contestation of ownership.
Comprehensive legal action, including filing a Heggstad petition, is often required when financial institutions, title companies, or other holders of assets refuse to accept documentary proof of trust ownership. In such cases, trustees may lack the authority to access funds or transfer property, and an orderly administration of the trust is impeded. Filing a petition allows the probate court to examine the evidence, hear any objections, and make a binding determination that aligns legal title with the decedent’s intended estate plan, thereby resolving institutional refusals and enabling trustees to carry out their duties.
When beneficiaries, heirs, or other interested persons dispute whether an asset should be treated as trust property, a comprehensive legal approach becomes necessary to protect the trust’s administration and beneficiaries’ interests. A court proceeding allows evidence to be tested, witnesses examined, and a neutral judge to resolve contested facts. This process provides a final legal resolution that reduces the risk of future litigation and clarifies fiduciary authority. Preparing for such proceedings requires careful factual development and clear presentation to the court to support the petition’s relief.
Seeking a formal judicial declaration through a Heggstad petition provides legal certainty about asset ownership, enabling trustees to act with confidence in managing, transferring, or distributing property. This path can prevent delays caused by institutional holdbacks and reduce the risk that assets will be subjected to probate when the decedent intended otherwise. A court order carries weight with banks, title companies, and third parties, ensuring the trust’s directions are followed. For families aiming to honor a decedent’s estate plan and avoid future disputes, a judicial determination can be an effective and stable solution.
Another advantage of a court-based resolution is the finality it brings to ownership questions, which protects trustees and beneficiaries from subsequent challenges. When the court declares assets to be part of the trust, institutions must generally comply with the order, and the likelihood of re-litigation diminishes. This outcome supports efficient administration and distribution according to the trust’s terms, helping families move forward with clarity and reduced administrative burdens. While court proceedings involve time and costs, their ability to provide binding resolution often outweighs the drawbacks in contested or uncertain situations.
A court declaration establishes the trustee’s authority over assets that were intended to be trust property, giving financial institutions clear instructions on how to proceed. This reduces delays in accessing funds needed for estate administration, paying debts, or distributing assets to beneficiaries. It also protects trustees from personal liability by providing a judicially recognized basis for their actions. When title defects would otherwise prevent trust administration, a Heggstad petition supplies the legal foundation a trustee needs to fulfill fiduciary duties in a timely and orderly way for the benefit of the trust’s beneficiaries.
By resolving ownership disputes in a formal court proceeding, a Heggstad petition limits the risk of future challenges that could reopen asset distribution questions. A judicial determination is durable and typically deters later claims that the asset should have passed differently. This stability helps beneficiaries receive their intended distributions without repeated legal interruption, and it allows trustees to close the administration of the trust with confidence. While litigation is sometimes necessary, the value of a definitive ruling can far outweigh the short-term inconvenience by preventing longer, costlier disputes down the line.
Begin by gathering all trust-related paperwork, wills, deeds, beneficiary designations, account statements, and any correspondence with financial institutions. Early document collection strengthens the factual record, reducing the time needed to prepare a persuasive petition if court action becomes necessary. It also helps determine whether institutions may accept the trust’s claim without filing a petition. Consistent documentation that shows the decedent’s intent to fund the trust and any steps taken toward retitling is often the most influential evidence when contesting title or negotiating an administrative resolution with third parties.
Well-crafted declarations from trustees, witnesses, or professionals who can recount the decedent’s intent are essential to a successful petition. Declarations should be specific, reference supporting documents, and explain why title was not formally changed. Witness statements that corroborate planning conversations or the decedent’s consistent actions can be especially persuasive. Thorough, factual declarations help the court assess the credibility of the claim and connect documentary evidence to the decedent’s actual intentions regarding trust funding.
You may need a Heggstad petition if clearly intended trust assets remain in the decedent’s name, preventing trustees from administering or distributing property according to the trust. This scenario can lead to institutional refusals, delays, and increased administrative costs. A judicial declaration helps align legal title with the estate plan, avoiding the time and public nature of probate. Seeking court resolution can also protect beneficiaries’ interests and reduce the risk of future disputes by creating an official record that documents the decedent’s intent and confirms the trust’s ownership rights.
Another reason to consider this service is when disputes or uncertainty among heirs threaten the orderly administration of the estate. If assertions conflict about whether assets were meant for the trust, a petition provides a forum for testing evidence and reaching a final determination. Obtaining a court ruling can simplify relationships among interested parties, authorize trustees to act, and set a clear path for distributing assets. The process can restore momentum to estate administration and ensure the decedent’s documented planning choices are respected and implemented.
Typical circumstances include real estate or bank accounts never retitled into the trust, insurance proceeds payable to the estate instead of the trust, retirement accounts with conflicting beneficiary designations, and deed transfers that were never recorded. These technical defects do not always reflect the decedent’s true intentions, but they can prevent trustees from accessing assets. When institutions require formal proof or when interested parties disagree, a Heggstad petition can resolve these ownership ambiguities and allow the trust to operate according to the decedent’s plan.
Real property intended for a trust may not have been transferred or recorded before the owner’s death, leaving title in the decedent’s name. This can block the trustee’s ability to sell, refinance, or transfer the property to beneficiaries. A Heggstad petition requests a court declaration that the property was intended to be trust-owned, supported by documentation like trust language, draft deeds, or communications with title professionals. Securing a court determination clears title issues and gives the trustee authority to take actions consistent with the trust’s provisions.
Bank and brokerage accounts may have been overlooked during funding and remain titled in the decedent’s name at death. Because many institutions require formal proof of ownership before transferring or liquidating accounts, trustees can be left unable to access funds for expenses, taxes, or distributions. Presenting account statements, trust documents, and sworn declarations can persuade some institutions, but if that is not sufficient, a Heggstad petition offers a judicial path to recognize the accounts as trust property and allow the trustee to manage them according to the trust terms.
Conflicts arise when beneficiary designations on life insurance, annuities, or retirement accounts do not reflect the decedent’s trust plan, or when competing documents suggest different intentions. A Heggstad petition can reconcile these conflicts by providing a forum to present evidence of the decedent’s overall estate planning intent. Courts consider the full picture, including draft documents and witness statements, to determine whether the assets should be treated as part of the trust. This helps ensure distributions align with the decedent’s broader planning choices rather than isolated paperwork errors.
Residents of Los Altos Hills and surrounding areas can rely on local counsel to navigate the nuances of Heggstad petitions and trust administration matters. Local knowledge of county probate procedures and relationships with area courts and institutions can streamline filings and communication. We focus on gathering the right evidence, preparing court filings where necessary, and advocating for the orderly resolution of title disputes. If you are a trustee, beneficiary, or family member facing delays due to untransferred assets, reach out to discuss practical steps toward securing a legal determination that reflects the decedent’s plans.
Our firm emphasizes attentive client communication, careful document review, and a solutions-oriented approach to resolving title and trust funding disputes. We help clients understand their options, weigh the potential benefits of informal negotiation versus a court petition, and prepare the strongest possible evidentiary record for presentation. Our practice focuses on delivering clear legal guidance and practical steps that align with the client’s objectives, whether that means pursuing a negotiated outcome with institutions or seeking a formal court declaration when necessary to enforce the decedent’s intent.
We work closely with trustees and beneficiaries to collect documentation, draft thoughtful declarations, and develop a coherent narrative connecting documents and testimony. That careful preparation helps courts and third parties see the decedent’s planning intentions. Throughout the process, we communicate options, likely timelines, and potential costs so clients can make informed decisions about how to proceed. Our goal is to minimize delay, protect beneficiaries’ rights, and secure a legally sound path forward for administering the trust.
When court action is necessary, we present petitions with clarity and thoroughness, supporting the request with clear exhibits and factual declarations. We also explore settlement opportunities where appropriate, seeking efficient resolutions that serve the trust and its beneficiaries. Whether dealing with banks, title companies, or adverse parties, our approach prioritizes reducing disruption to trust administration while pursuing a definitive resolution that honors the decedent’s estate plan and protects the interests of those who rely on it.
Our process begins with a thorough review of trust documents, wills, account records, and any correspondence that sheds light on the decedent’s intent. We then contact the asset holders to attempt an administrative resolution. If that approach fails, we prepare the petition, supporting declarations, and exhibits for court filing. We handle service on interested parties, respond to objections, and advocate for a declaration that aligns legal title with the trust. Throughout, we keep clients informed of developments and tactical choices so they understand what to expect at each stage of the proceeding.
The first step focuses on assembling all relevant documents and evidence, including the trust instrument, wills, deeds, account statements, beneficiary designations, and any communications with financial institutions. This evidence forms the backbone of a petition and helps determine whether an informal resolution is possible. We identify witnesses who can attest to the decedent’s intent and prepare declarations that tie documents to factual circumstances. A complete factual record improves the chance of a favorable administrative or judicial outcome and clarifies whether filing a petition is warranted.
Careful examination of the trust instrument, any draft or executed deeds, and related estate planning documents helps reveal the decedent’s intended asset allocations and steps taken toward funding. We compare account titles and beneficiary designations to the trust’s directions and note discrepancies. Identifying these inconsistencies early allows us to develop a strategy for either convincing institutions to accept the trust’s claim or preparing a petition that explains the reasons for the missing title transfers and demonstrates the intent to fund the trust.
We compile account statements, correspondence with financial institutions, draft deeds, and declarations from knowledgeable witnesses to create a cohesive evidentiary record. Witness statements can describe conversations the decedent had about the trust and any instructions given to advisors. This factual foundation is used both for informal negotiations with institutions and, if necessary, to support the petition filed with the court. Strengthening the record early reduces surprises and positions the petition for effective judicial consideration.
After evidence gathering, we approach the institutions holding the assets with a clear presentation of the trust documents and supporting declarations to seek voluntary recognition of trust ownership. If institutions accept the evidence, retitling or release of assets may proceed without court intervention. When institutions decline to cooperate, we prepare the Heggstad petition with exhibits and sworn declarations tailored to persuade the court that the assets were intended to be trust property and should be recognized as such as of the decedent’s death.
We provide institutions with a well-organized packet of documents and declarations to support the trust’s claim and request retitling or release of funds. These negotiations are documented and can demonstrate to the court that administrative remedies were pursued prior to filing. Where helpful, we explain the legal basis for the trust’s ownership claim and offer practical solutions to remove holdbacks. Successful negotiation avoids formal court proceedings and often leads to faster access to assets for necessary estate administration tasks.
If institutions decline to accept the presented evidence, we prepare the Heggstad petition for filing in probate court, attaching the trust, related documents, and supporting declarations. The petition sets forth the factual and legal basis for declaring the asset trust property and identifies interested parties for service. Filing initiates the judicial process and positions the court to evaluate the evidence. We monitor timelines, manage service on parties, and respond to any initial court inquiries to keep proceedings moving efficiently toward resolution.
Following filing and service, the court may schedule a hearing to evaluate the petition and any objections. We present supporting declarations and exhibits and address questions the judge may have about intent, documentation, and the circumstances that prevented formal retitling. If the court finds the evidence persuasive, it issues a declaration recognizing the asset as trust property as of the decedent’s death. That order clarifies fiduciary authority and directs institutions to honor the trust’s ownership, allowing trustees to proceed with management and distribution.
Preparation for a hearing involves ensuring declarations are clear, exhibits are organized, and witness statements are available to corroborate the narrative of the decedent’s intent. We anticipate potential objections and prepare legal arguments to address them. Presenting the evidence succinctly and persuasively helps the court reach a reasoned determination. If necessary, we work with opposing parties to narrow contested issues and seek agreements that reduce hearing time and judicial resources while preserving the trust’s goals.
After the court issues a declaration, we assist with enforcing the order and communicating it to banks, title companies, and other institutions. This may involve recording a certified copy of the order or providing the institution with court-authenticated paperwork. If a third party resists compliance, we use the court’s ruling to obtain enforcement and ensure the trustee can complete necessary transactions. Post-declaration work also includes advising on necessary trust administration steps to effectuate distributions and close the matter efficiently.
A Heggstad petition is a legal request to the probate court to declare that specific assets were intended to be trust property even though title was not formally transferred prior to the owner’s death. It is used when lack of formal retitling prevents a trustee from accessing or distributing assets according to the trust’s terms. The petition relies on documentary evidence and sworn statements to demonstrate the decedent’s intent and asks the court to align legal title with that intent so the trust can be administered as planned. The petition is appropriate when administrative approaches have failed or when a clear judicial determination is necessary to overcome institutional refusals or potential disputes among interested parties. Courts assess the totality of evidence, including trust language, draft deeds, account records, and witness declarations. The goal is to provide a definitive legal resolution that permits rightful trust administration and protects beneficiaries from unnecessary probate or prolonged uncertainty.
The time to resolve a Heggstad petition varies depending on factors like whether an administrative resolution is possible, court calendars, and whether the petition is contested. Some matters are resolved quickly if institutions accept documentation without a hearing, while contested petitions that require a hearing may take several months. Early efforts to negotiate with asset holders and thorough preparation of supporting evidence can shorten the overall timeline by reducing contested issues and helping institutions see the claim’s validity. Court schedules and the need to serve and allow time for responses from interested parties affect timing. Preparing a complete petition with clear declarations and exhibits can prevent delays caused by supplemental filings or requests for more evidence. While timing is case-specific, proactive evidence gathering and communication often lead to a more efficient process and quicker resolution for trustees and beneficiaries.
The most persuasive evidence in a Heggstad petition demonstrates the decedent’s intent to fund the trust and explains why title was not transferred. This may include the trust document itself, draft deeds or transfer paperwork, account statements suggesting the asset was earmarked for trust funding, emails or letters describing the plan, and declarations from witnesses who can attest to the decedent’s statements or actions. Clear documentary links between the decedent’s planning and the asset at issue strengthen the case. Additionally, declarations from trustees, family members, or advisors that recount contemporaneous conversations and behaviors can corroborate documentary evidence. Evidence that institutions were informed of the trust or that the decedent took steps toward funding but did not complete retitling also helps the court understand the circumstances and reach a conclusion consistent with the decedent’s intent.
Yes, negotiating with the bank or title company is often a good first step and can lead to a faster, less costly resolution. Many institutions will review trust documents, declarations, and supporting records and may decide to release funds or retitle accounts without a court order. Documenting these communications and the institution’s responses is important because it demonstrates that administrative remedies were attempted before seeking judicial relief, which courts often view favorably. However, if institutions refuse to accept the provided evidence or require a court judgment, a Heggstad petition may be necessary. The petition then becomes the formal mechanism to obtain the legal authority needed for trustees to manage or distribute the assets in accordance with the trust.
When filing a Heggstad petition, you must notify all interested parties who have a legal stake in the estate or the specific asset. This typically includes beneficiaries named in the trust and will, heirs at law, trustees, and anyone with a recorded interest in the property. Proper service ensures that those parties have an opportunity to respond or object, and it allows the court to consider any concerns raised by potentially affected persons. The exact list of required notice recipients depends on the asset and the trust’s terms. Ensuring accurate service and meeting procedural requirements is vital to avoid challenges to the court’s eventual declaration and to ensure the petition proceeds without procedural complications that could prolong resolution.
If a petition is denied, alternatives may include refining the evidentiary record and refiling with additional documentation, negotiating settlements with interested parties, or pursuing other probate remedies where appropriate. Sometimes supplemental evidence or additional witness declarations can address deficiencies identified by the court. In other instances, parties may reach a negotiated agreement that resolves ownership without further litigation. A denial may also prompt review of whether administration through probate is required or advisable for particular assets. Discussing the court’s reasoning and exploring alternative legal routes with counsel can identify next steps to protect beneficiaries’ interests and pursue the most effective resolution consistent with the estate plan.
A Heggstad petition primarily addresses questions of title and ownership as of the decedent’s death and is not itself a tax proceeding. However, the petition’s outcome can affect administration steps that have tax implications, such as property transfers or distributions. Trustees should coordinate with tax advisors to understand any tax reporting or liabilities that result from recognizing assets as trust property and to ensure proper handling of tax matters during administration. Creditors’ claims are generally addressed through the probate process, but recognizing assets as trust property may change how certain claims are handled depending on timing and the asset type. Trustees should consider creditor timelines and notification requirements and seek advice to ensure that the resolution of title issues does not inadvertently affect the estate’s obligations.
Yes, a trustee has standing to file a Heggstad petition to obtain court recognition of assets that were intended to be part of the trust. Trustees act on behalf of the trust and its beneficiaries to secure the assets necessary for proper administration. Filing a petition is one mechanism a trustee can use to assert the trust’s rights and gain the authority needed to manage or distribute the contested assets in accordance with the trust’s terms. When trustees take this step, they must gather and present evidence that supports the trust’s claim and follow procedural requirements, including providing notice to interested persons. Courts will evaluate the trustee’s petition in light of the evidence and the trustee’s fiduciary obligations to manage trust property for beneficiaries.
Yes, filings in probate court generally become part of the public record, including Heggstad petitions and associated orders. This means the petition, supporting exhibits, and the court’s decision may be accessible to the public. For clients concerned about privacy, exploring administrative resolutions or redacting sensitive information consistent with court rules may be possible, though some information will typically remain public once filed. If privacy is a significant concern, consider attempting administrative solutions with institutions before filing and discussing confidentiality options with counsel. In some cases, courts may allow limited filings or specific protective measures for particularly sensitive materials, but public filing is usually part of the formal judicial process.
To start the process, gather the trust document, wills, deeds, account statements, beneficiary designations, and any correspondence related to the asset in question. Contact the institution holding the asset to present the trust documentation and determine whether it will accept alternative proof of ownership. Document your communications and any refusals, as that record is helpful if court action becomes necessary. If the institution declines to cooperate or if there are disputes among interested parties, consult with counsel to evaluate the evidence and discuss filing a Heggstad petition. Legal counsel can help assemble declarations, organize exhibits, and prepare the petition so that the probate court can promptly consider declaring the asset part of the trust.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas