A Heggstad petition is a legal route in California to transfer real property into a trust when title was not properly retitled during the estate planning process. If you established a revocable living trust but the deed to a parcel of property was never changed, a Heggstad proceeding can confirm your intent and place that asset in the trust without having to re-record deeds in complex circumstances. At the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman in San Jose, we assist Morgan Hill residents with understanding when this petition is appropriate and the steps needed to protect family property and preserve the trust plan.
Filing a Heggstad petition involves demonstrating that the property owner intended the asset to be held in trust and that the failure to transfer title was inadvertent or an oversight. This process may be needed for single-family homes, vacant land, or other real estate that is part of an estate plan but remains titled in the grantor’s name. Timely action often helps avoid probate and reduces administrative friction for beneficiaries. Our team explains the documentation typically required, possible court timelines, and realistic outcomes so you can make informed decisions about preserving your estate plan.
A Heggstad petition can restore the intent of a trust arrangement by moving an inadvertently unfunded asset into the trust without needing a full probate proceeding. This helps ensure beneficiaries receive property under the terms the grantor intended while minimizing delay and cost. For families in Morgan Hill and surrounding Santa Clara County, resolving funding gaps protects privacy, streamlines administration, and lowers the risk of disputes about whether property was meant to be in the trust. Properly handled, a Heggstad petition supports the smooth transfer of assets and preserves the estate planning goals set out in the trust document.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman focuses on estate planning matters for individuals and families across San Jose, Morgan Hill, and broader Santa Clara County. Our practice covers revocable living trusts, wills, financial powers of attorney, advance health care directives, and actions such as Heggstad petitions to correct trust funding oversights. We provide clear explanations of legal procedures, help gather supporting documents like trust instruments and deeds, and guide clients through filings and hearings when necessary. Our approach emphasizes thorough preparation, thoughtful communication with clients, and careful attention to the court requirements that affect trust administration.
A Heggstad petition asks a court to declare that a particular property was intended to be held in a trust even though title was never formally retitled into the trust’s name. To succeed, the petition typically must show convincing evidence of the grantor’s intent to place the property in trust, such as the trust document, contemporaneous notes, declarations, or other corroborating actions consistent with funding. Family conversations, the sequence of estate planning documents, and prior legal or financial advice can also be relevant. The court then assesses whether granting the petition will align the legal ownership with the grantor’s documented estate plan.
The practical steps for a Heggstad petition involve identifying the affected parcel, collecting the trust and related records, preparing declarations that explain the circumstances of the omission, and filing a petition in the appropriate California superior court. Parties who might have an interest in the property are notified and can object, so careful notice and documentation are essential to limit contested proceedings. When successful, the petition results in a court order directing county recording officials to recognize the trust’s ownership or authorizing other actions necessary to reflect the trust’s intent in official records.
A Heggstad petition is a specialized probate court action in California used to correct the title of real property intended to be held by a trust when record title remains in the name of the deceased or incapacitated owner. The petition explains the discrepancy between recorded title and the estate planning documents, and asks the court to confirm that the trust holds ownership under California law. This tool is commonly used for properties that were overlooked during funding of a revocable living trust, addressing matters that simple postmortem deeds or transfers cannot resolve without court approval.
Critical elements include the trust document itself, statements showing the grantor’s intent to fund the trust, and any contemporaneous actions pointing to that intent. Supporting material may include deed drafts, correspondence, loan or title company communications, and witness declarations from individuals familiar with the grantor’s planning. The petition must also provide proper legal description of the property and proof of notice to interested parties. Attention to procedural requirements, accurate property descriptions, and clear evidentiary support improves the likelihood of a favorable outcome without unnecessary litigation.
Understanding legal terms helps demystify the Heggstad process. Key terms include grantor, trust, beneficiary, deed, probate court, and notice of petition. Each term frames a different aspect of the filing and affects who must be informed and how ownership questions are resolved. Knowing these definitions helps property owners and family members follow the steps necessary to present coherent evidence to the court. The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provides clear explanations of these terms so clients feel informed about the procedural and substantive elements involved in aligning title with estate documents.
Grantor refers to the person who created the trust and who transferred or intended to transfer assets into that trust. In Heggstad matters, the grantor’s actions and written planning documents are the central evidence for showing intent to hold property in trust. Declarations, notes, or contemporaneous documentation from the grantor can help prove that a property was meant to be included even when the recorded title was never updated. Accurate documentation of the grantor’s plan and consistent instructions reduce ambiguity and support the petition in court.
Trust funding describes the process of transferring ownership of assets into the name of a trust so the trust controls those assets during the grantor’s life and at death. Common funding steps include executing and recording deeds for real property, changing account ownership for financial assets, and assigning titles where required. A Heggstad petition addresses situations where funding was incomplete or omitted for real property, and therefore seeks to align formal records with the grantor’s clearly stated trust plan and intent to avoid probate or administrative confusion.
Probate court is the venue where matters of estate administration and trust-related disputes are resolved under state law. For a Heggstad petition, the probate or superior court reviews the evidence presented to determine whether recorded title should be recognized as belonging to the trust. The court’s authority includes issuing orders to correct records, resolve competing claims, and approve transfers consistent with the grantor’s intent. Proper filings, legal arguments, and notice protocols must conform to court rules to achieve a straightforward resolution.
Notice and interested parties are central to the Heggstad process because the court requires that those with potential legal or financial interests in the property be informed of the petition. Interested parties may include beneficiaries, heirs at law, creditors, and anyone holding a recorded interest in the property. Providing accurate notice allows these parties to raise objections or consent to the petition. Thoroughly identifying and notifying interested parties reduces the risk of later disputes and helps produce a final order that accurately reflects ownership consistent with the grantor’s planning.
When property intended for a trust remains untitled, options include recording a corrective deed, initiating a Heggstad petition, or pursuing a full probate administration. Corrective deeds can work when the grantor is alive and competent to sign or when statutory procedures apply, but they may not resolve disputes when the grantor has died or lacks capacity. Probate can settle title but often consumes more time and resources. A Heggstad petition provides a targeted court remedy to confirm trust ownership without full probate, making it a preferable choice in many cases where documentary evidence supports the grantor’s intent.
A limited, nonjudicial approach such as a corrective deed may be adequate when the grantor remains competent and can execute proper transfer documents, or when state law permits a simple deed of transfer into the trust. These approaches avoid court involvement, reduce costs, and can be completed relatively quickly. However, they require that the grantor or lawful representative have the authority to sign and that no third party objects. When these conditions are present, families can correct funding gaps with minimal legal proceedings and maintain the trust’s original estate planning goals.
If all affected parties, including beneficiaries and potential heirs, agree that the property should be in the trust and there are no competing claims, parties can often accomplish the transfer without court action by preparing and recording the necessary documents. Written consents, corrective deeds, and clear chain-of-title information make it straightforward to reflect the trust’s ownership in public records. This cooperative route reduces expense and complexity, but it requires careful documentation to prevent future disagreements and to ensure clear title for transactions such as sales or refinancing.
Comprehensive legal assistance is often required when there are competing claims to a property, unclear documentation, or objections from beneficiaries or creditors that raise complex legal questions. In these situations, a formal Heggstad petition presents evidence to the court and addresses objections through legal argument and filings. The process may involve depositions, hearings, and negotiations to resolve claims while preserving the overall estate plan. Careful legal preparation and advocacy help establish the facts the court needs to make a lawful determination about ownership and trust funding.
If records are incomplete, inconsistent, or ambiguous about the grantor’s intent, professional legal services can assemble the strongest possible evidentiary showing for the court. Gathering deeds, trust instruments, correspondence, and credible witness declarations requires time and legal knowledge about admissible evidence. When paperwork is unclear, strategic legal presentation can bridge gaps by tying together contemporaneous documents and factual history. Courts respond to coherent narratives supported by admissible documents, so thorough preparation is critical to obtaining an order that properly reflects the grantor’s plan.
A comprehensive, court-based resolution such as a Heggstad petition can provide finality and clarity where nonjudicial fixes are inadequate. By obtaining a judicial declaration of trust ownership, families reduce the likelihood of subsequent title challenges and create a clear record that county officials and financial institutions can rely upon. A judicial order can also address complex lien or mortgage issues that might otherwise complicate transfers. For many families, the certainty afforded by a court order outweighs the additional steps involved in seeking judicial confirmation.
Additionally, proceeding through the court provides a structured process for notifying interested parties and resolving competing claims in a transparent way. This can preserve family relationships by creating an objective forum for disputes and a legally enforceable result. A comprehensive approach also ensures that the property’s legal description is accurate in court records and that subsequent recordings reflect the trust’s ownership, which facilitates future transactions such as sales, refinances, or distributions to beneficiaries under the trust terms.
Securing a court order through a Heggstad petition significantly lowers the chance that a third party will later contest title to the property. The judicial record provides a definitive statement as to ownership that title companies and successors can accept with confidence, simplifying future transfers or sales. This benefit is especially important when properties are high value or when multiple heirs could claim conflicting interests. Establishing clear title now avoids expensive litigation later and helps beneficiaries proceed with greater certainty when carrying out the grantor’s wishes.
A Heggstad petition centers the grantor’s documented intent and aligns the legal record with the trust provisions designed to govern asset distribution. The court’s order restores the plan’s effect and prevents unintended outcomes that could arise from unrecorded title. Preserving the grantor’s intention helps family members honor the estate plan and ensures that assets flow according to the trust’s instructions rather than default probate rules. This preserves both the legal and practical goals of estate planning for beneficiaries and fiduciaries.
Assembling all relevant documents at the outset makes a Heggstad filing more efficient and persuasive. Collect a complete copy of the trust instrument, any amendments, deeds or memos referencing the property, title reports, mortgage statements, and any correspondence that references the grantor’s intent. Witness statements from individuals familiar with the grantor’s plan can also strengthen the petition. Early organization helps identify gaps and reduces the need for supplemental filings or continuances, enabling the court to reach a decision more quickly and with fewer disputes.
Courts want a clear explanation of why title was never changed and what actions reflect the grantor’s intent to include the property in the trust. Prepare a concise narrative supported by documents and witness statements that explains the oversight, whether it resulted from timing issues, administrative error, or other circumstances. A thoughtful, well-documented explanation demonstrates the underlying intent and increases the likelihood of a favorable judicial determination, while reducing the scope for adversarial challenges or extended litigation.
Pursuing a Heggstad petition is often appropriate when a property was clearly intended to be part of a trust but remains in the grantor’s name due to oversight. This petition helps avoid probate, preserves privacy for the estate, and reduces delays for beneficiaries who would otherwise need to wait for a probate administration. For properties with liens, mortgages, or complex title histories, the petition can clarify ownership and enable financial institutions to accept the trust as the rightful owner. When the evidence is supportive, this route brings legal finality consistent with the trust terms.
Another important reason to consider a Heggstad filing is to protect family relationships by resolving ownership questions through a formal process rather than informal, potentially contested transfers. The court’s oversight ensures that competing claims are addressed impartially and that notice is provided to all parties who may be affected. For many families, the certainty of a judicial order outweighs the expense of litigation because it minimizes the risk of later disputes and provides a clean title record that beneficiaries can rely upon for future transactions.
Typical circumstances include a grantor who created a revocable living trust but failed to retitle real property before death, an estate where the trust was intended to hold certain parcels but documentary errors occurred, or situations where property was purchased with the intent to fund a trust but was inadvertently left in the buyer’s personal name. These scenarios often come to light during estate administration or when beneficiaries attempt to transfer or sell the property and discover the title does not match the trust records, prompting the need for court clarification.
Properties can be overlooked for many reasons, including a change of residence, reliance on third parties to record deeds, or misunderstanding of funding procedures. When an asset is left in the grantor’s name, it may not pass under the trust as intended, leading to confusion for heirs and beneficiaries. A Heggstad petition addresses these oversights by presenting the trust and supporting evidence to the court and seeking an order that recognizes the property as part of the trust, helping restore the estate plan’s original intent and facilitating efficient administration.
Deeds prepared but never recorded, or deeds with technical mistakes such as incorrect legal descriptions or missing signatures, can prevent clear title from showing the trust as owner. These defects may be discovered when a sale or refinance is attempted, or during routine estate review. A Heggstad petition can remedy these defects by allowing the court to validate the intended transfer, provided there is sufficient evidence of the grantor’s intent and proper notice to interested parties, thereby enabling marketable title and future transactions to proceed.
Family disagreements about whether property was meant to be in a trust can stall estate administration and create risk of litigation. When parties dispute title or the grantor’s intent, bringing the matter before the court through a Heggstad petition provides a neutral forum for resolution. The court evaluates the evidence and issues an order that clarifies ownership. This judicial path reduces uncertainty and helps prevent extended disputes by producing an enforceable determination about the property’s status relative to the trust.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman serves clients in Morgan Hill, San Jose, and throughout Santa Clara County with practical legal assistance for trust funding issues, including Heggstad petitions. We provide personalized attention to gather documents, prepare clear statements of intent, and meet all procedural requirements for court filings. Our goal is to guide families through each step so they understand the likely timeline and possible outcomes, and so that title issues are resolved efficiently and in a way that honors the original estate planning objectives.
Clients work with our firm because we combine experience in California trust and probate procedures with a focused approach to resolving title and funding mistakes. We aim to reduce stress by explaining legal options clearly, outlining realistic timelines, and preparing filings that comply with court requirements. For families in Morgan Hill and the surrounding area, our local knowledge of county recording practices and probate court preferences helps to anticipate procedural needs and streamline the path to a judicial declaration when that is the best course of action.
We prioritize thorough document review and careful notice to interested parties to limit delays and reduce the likelihood of contested proceedings. Preparing strong supporting evidence, including pertinent trust provisions and witness declarations, makes a petition more persuasive. Our approach emphasizes communication with clients about the strengths and potential challenges of their case so they can make informed decisions. When litigation is necessary, we advocate for efficient resolution while protecting the grantor’s stated intentions and the beneficiaries’ interests.
Additionally, our practice handles related estate planning updates to prevent future funding errors, such as preparing pour-over wills, recording certifications of trust, and advising on deeds to ensure other assets are properly titled. We help clients review existing estate plans to identify risks and implement corrective measures that reduce the need for court intervention down the road. By combining remediation of current title issues with preventive planning, families receive a comprehensive path back to a cohesive estate plan.
Our process begins with a focused intake to understand the property, the trust provisions, and the circumstances that led to untitled assets. We then gather documents, identify interested parties, and assess whether a corrective deed or a Heggstad petition is the most appropriate path. If a petition is advisable, we prepare declarations and evidence that present a clear narrative of intent and file the petition with the superior court. We handle notices, respond to any objections, and seek an order that aligns title with the trust while minimizing delay and expense for the family.
In the initial phase, we review the trust instrument, any relevant deeds, title reports, mortgage records, and correspondence that reflect the grantor’s planning. We interview available witnesses and collect statements that corroborate the grantor’s intent. This stage identifies possible procedural hurdles, interested parties, and evidentiary gaps that need to be addressed. Accurate legal descriptions and a full understanding of the property’s title history are essential to drafting a persuasive petition and anticipating potential objections or competing claims.
We obtain copies of the trust, any amendments, draft deeds, and prior title reports to reconstruct the funding chronology. These documents often include signatures, notarial acknowledgments, and contemporaneous notes that support the claim the grantor intended ownership by the trust. Where documents are missing, we seek alternative evidence such as written communications, banking records, or witness declarations. Complete documentation helps the court understand the grantor’s intent and reduces the need for supplemental requests or contested evidentiary hearings.
We research public records to list heirs, beneficiaries, lienholders, and other parties with potential interests, and prepare required notices in accordance with court rules. Proper notice is critical to avoid later objections based on improper service. We also reach out to family members to explain the process and encourage cooperation where possible. Adequate notice supports prompt resolution and demonstrates to the court that all affected parties have been given an opportunity to be heard, reducing the risk of delays or contested hearings.
With the evidence in hand, we draft the petition and supporting declarations that explain the circumstances and legal basis for recognizing the trust’s ownership of the property. The filing includes an accurate legal description, a clear statement of the grantor’s intent, and documentation of notice to interested parties. We aim to present a concise but comprehensive record that allows the court to grant relief without prolonged discovery or evidentiary disputes when the facts are clear and the interested parties are properly informed.
Declarations articulate the factual basis for the petition, recount the grantor’s actions, and submit evidence such as trust excerpts and contemporaneous communications. Witness declarations often confirm discussions or acts demonstrating intent to fund the trust. We focus on presenting declarations that are factual, well-organized, and legally admissible so the judge can readily assess whether the property belongs in the trust. Strong declarations are central to avoiding extended litigation and helping the court issue a definitive order.
We file the petition in the appropriate superior court and follow local rules for submitting documents, paying fees, and scheduling hearings. Accurate filing and adherence to procedural requirements reduce the risk of dismissal or postponement. Once filed, the court sets a schedule for responses, objections, and the eventual hearing. We monitor deadlines, serve notified parties as required, and handle any requests for continuances or supplemental filings that arise during the process to maintain momentum toward a resolution.
After the hearing, the court may grant the petition and issue an order confirming the trust’s ownership of the property. That order is used to record corrected title documentation with county officials and to update the public record so the trust is reflected as owner. If objections arise, we represent clients at hearings to resolve disputes and propose equitable remedies. Once the order is recorded, beneficiaries can proceed with sales, transfers, or distributions in accordance with the trust, and the property is protected from uncertainty regarding ownership.
When the judge issues a favorable order, we prepare the necessary documents to record that order with the county recorder’s office so the trust appears as owner in public records. Recording the order clarifies title and is essential for future transactions involving the property. We coordinate with title companies and county officials to ensure the recorded documents meet requirements, and we provide copies to clients and beneficiaries so they have a complete file showing the judicial resolution and the updated title status.
After recording, trustees and beneficiaries can manage the property according to the trust terms, including selling, refinancing, or distributing proceeds consistent with the document. We advise trustees on recordkeeping and reporting obligations and help prepare any additional documents like certifications of trust or assignments needed for third parties. Clear communication to beneficiaries about the outcome and next steps ensures smooth administration following the court order and reduces the chance of future misunderstandings about the property’s status.
A Heggstad petition is a probate court proceeding in California used to confirm that real property was intended to be owned by a trust even though the deed was never transferred into the trust’s name. It is typically considered when a grantor created a revocable living trust but an asset was overlooked during the funding process and the property remains titled in the grantor’s personal name. The petition asks the court to recognize the trust as the rightful owner based on the grantor’s documented intent and supporting evidence. You should consider filing a Heggstad petition when nonjudicial remedies are unavailable or inadequate, such as when the grantor has died or lacks capacity and corrective deeds cannot be executed. The petition is particularly useful when there is clear documentary or witness evidence showing intent to fund, but the recorded title does not reflect that intent. The petition can bring finality by aligning title with the trust and avoiding full probate in many cases.
A corrective deed is a nonjudicial document that can transfer title into a trust without court involvement when the grantor is alive and able to execute the deed, or when statutory procedures allow a transfer. A Heggstad petition, by contrast, is a court proceeding used when a nonjudicial fix is not possible, such as after the grantor’s death or when there are competing claims or unclear authority to sign. The petition asks the court to rule on ownership and can be used to correct title when a deed alone will not suffice. Choosing between these options depends on circumstances like the grantor’s capacity, the existence of clear deed language, and whether there are objections from heirs or creditors. When records are ambiguous or an interested party contests the transfer, a Heggstad petition provides a judicial avenue to resolve disputes and ensure the trust’s ownership is officially recognized in county records.
When filing a Heggstad petition, you must provide notice to all interested parties who may have a legal or financial stake in the property. This generally includes beneficiaries named in the trust, heirs at law, recorded lienholders, co-owners, and sometimes creditors depending on the circumstances. Properly identifying and serving these parties is a procedural requirement, and proof of service is typically filed with the court as part of the petition package to demonstrate compliance with notice obligations. Failure to notify interested parties can lead to delays or challenges based on inadequate service, so careful research of public records and family connections is important. Notifying parties also gives them an opportunity to raise objections or consent to the petition, which the court will consider before issuing an order transferring or recognizing trust ownership of the property.
The court usually looks for clear and convincing evidence of the grantor’s intent to place the property in the trust. This evidence can include the trust document and its terms, contemporaneous notes or writings, draft deeds referencing the property, title company communications, and witness declarations from people who can attest to the grantor’s statements or actions. The better the documentary record and corroborating testimony, the stronger the petition’s prospects for success in court. Evidence that shows consistent planning behavior and steps toward funding the trust strengthens the petition. Courts weigh the totality of the evidence, so a combination of written documents and credible witness accounts that demonstrate the grantor’s intent and the reason for the omission is often persuasive. Preparing these materials carefully helps the court reach a clear conclusion aligned with the trust’s terms.
A Heggstad petition can often avoid a full probate administration by confirming the trust’s ownership of the property and removing it from estate assets that would otherwise be subject to probate. If the property is successfully recognized as trust property, it will pass under the terms of the trust rather than through the probate process. This can save time, expense, and public disclosure associated with probate, though circumstances vary depending on other estate matters and creditor claims. However, a Heggstad petition is not a universal substitute for probate in all cases. If other estate issues exist, such as additional assets titled solely in the decedent’s name or significant creditor claims, further legal steps may be necessary. The petition addresses the specific title issue but does not automatically resolve unrelated probate matters that fall outside the court’s order concerning the property at issue.
The duration of a Heggstad petition varies based on factors like court scheduling, whether interested parties object, and how quickly necessary documentation can be assembled. In uncontested cases with clear evidence and timely notice, the process can move more quickly and conclude within a few months. Contested matters, scheduling delays, or the need for additional evidence can lengthen the timeline significantly, sometimes extending the process much longer depending on the court’s calendar and complexity of disputes. Early preparation of documents, prompt service of notice, and cooperation among interested parties can shorten timelines. Working with counsel who understands local court procedures and recording practices also helps anticipate potential issues and maintain momentum toward a hearing and final order, reducing the risk of avoidable delays.
Yes, creditors, heirs, or other interested parties can challenge a Heggstad petition if they believe the property should not be placed into the trust or if they claim a superior interest. Courts will allow objections to be heard and consider the merits of any challenge under applicable law. Proper notice and a well-documented petition reduce opportunities for successful challenges by ensuring parties have a chance to raise concerns early in the process. When objections arise, litigation may be needed to resolve factual disputes about intent, timing, or competing interests. Preparing strong evidence and clear declarations at the outset helps address likely objections and can narrow contested issues. The court weighs all arguments and evidence before issuing a binding determination on ownership.
If the property has a mortgage or lien, those recorded interests must be identified and considered when pursuing a Heggstad petition. The petition does not automatically eliminate valid liens, but the court order can clarify ownership and be recorded alongside existing encumbrances. Lienholders must be notified as interested parties so they can protect their positions, and the resolution may involve negotiations with mortgage lenders or lienholders to address outstanding obligations and ensure the trust can manage the property responsibly. In some cases, lenders may require documentation or approval before acknowledging the trust as owner for servicing or refinancing. Clear communication with lienholders and proper procedural notice helps manage expectations and creates a path toward resolving encumbrances after the court confirms ownership, facilitating future transactions while respecting existing creditor rights.
Costs for a Heggstad petition vary by case complexity, local court fees, and whether significant litigation or discovery is required. Typical expenses include court filing fees, costs of serving notice to interested parties, title and recording fees, and attorney fees for preparing the petition and supporting declarations. Uncontested matters with strong documentary support usually incur lower fees, while contested proceedings or cases requiring substantial evidence gathering will be more costly due to additional attorney time and possible court appearances. Prior to proceeding, firms often provide an estimate of likely costs based on the specifics of the matter and anticipated steps. Discussing budget expectations and potential fee structures early helps families plan financially and decide whether a Heggstad petition is the most appropriate option given the likely costs and benefits for resolving title in favor of the trust.
When property is owned jointly, the utility of a Heggstad petition depends on the nature of joint ownership and the grantor’s intent. If joint ownership includes the trust or if proper conveyances were intended but never recorded, a petition may still be appropriate in certain circumstances. However, joint tenancy or tenancy in common arrangements introduce additional legal considerations and potential rights of co-owners that the court will address. Each situation requires a careful review of deeds, trust terms, and ownership structure. If co-owners object or hold independent rights, resolving title may require negotiation or additional legal remedies beyond a Heggstad petition. Courts will evaluate the specific legal relationships among owners and the trust to determine whether the petition is suitable or whether alternative legal steps are necessary to effect an appropriate transfer consistent with the grantor’s plan and the rights of co-owners.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas