A trust modification petition can help Morgan Hill residents update their estate plan when circumstances change, legal issues arise, or terms of a trust no longer reflect the settlor’s intentions. At the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman, our approach focuses on clarifying the legal options available under California law, explaining the necessary steps to bring a petition, and helping clients prepare the required documentation. We guide clients through evaluating whether a nonjudicial modification is possible, when a court petition is necessary, and how to protect beneficiary rights while honoring the settlor’s goals for asset distribution and care planning.
Many clients come to us because their family circumstances have shifted, a trust contains ambiguous language, or a trustee transition is required. A trust modification petition can address problems such as outdated trustee provisions, changed distribution terms, or newly discovered assets. We explain the difference between modifying a revocable trust during the settlor’s lifetime and seeking court approval for changes after incapacity or death. Our goal is to help you evaluate whether amending the trust, decanting, or filing a trust modification petition is the most appropriate path given your situation and California probate code requirements.
Updating a trust through a modification petition can preserve the settlor’s intentions and reduce conflict among beneficiaries. A properly handled petition can correct errors, clarify vague language, and accommodate changed financial or family circumstances while maintaining the overall estate plan. It can help avoid prolonged disputes by documenting the legal basis for changes and involving the court when necessary to ensure enforceability. For families in Morgan Hill, resolving trust issues sooner rather than later minimizes administrative delays, protects assets from mismanagement, and provides beneficiaries with greater clarity about their rights and expectations under California law.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman offers estate planning and trust administration services for clients throughout Santa Clara County, including Morgan Hill. Our services cover trust creation, modification petitions, trust administration, and related filings like certification of trust and pour-over wills. We work closely with clients to understand their family dynamics, financial arrangements, and long-term goals so that any petition or amendment aligns with those priorities. Communication is focused on practical solutions and compliance with California law, with attention to documentation, timelines, and minimizing potential disagreements among interested parties.
A trust modification petition is a legal request filed with the probate court to change the terms of a trust when informal amendment is impossible or contested. Reasons for a petition include resolving ambiguities, adjusting trustee powers, addressing tax planning needs, or correcting mistakes in the original trust document. The process requires careful review of the trust instrument, identifying interested parties, and preparing factual declarations and legal arguments that justify the proposed modification under California statutes and case law. Filing a petition may involve notice to beneficiaries and other interested individuals to allow for objections and court consideration.
Not every trust matter needs court intervention; some modifications can be handled through amendment by the settlor or agreement among beneficiaries and trustees. When a court petition is appropriate, the filing will typically explain why a modification is necessary, what relief is requested, and how the change reflects the settlor’s intent or corrects a legal defect. The court evaluates whether the requested change is consistent with the law and the trust instrument. Throughout the process clients should expect careful documentation, sensitivity to family concerns, and guidance about how proposed changes affect distributions, trustee duties, and successor appointments.
A trust modification petition is a court filing that asks a probate judge to alter trust terms when other methods are unavailable or disputed. Common grounds include errors in drafting, ambiguous provisions that lead to conflicting interpretations, changed circumstances that undermine the trust’s purpose, or issues with trustee authority. In certain cases, modifications ensure tax intent or clarify beneficiary designations. The petition must identify the trust, the parties affected, the proposed changes, and the legal basis for the request. The court may approve modifications that preserve the settlor’s intent while resolving legal or factual problems that impede administration.
Successful petitions include a clear statement of the facts, a copy of the trust instrument, declarations from interested parties or witnesses when needed, and a proposed order reflecting the desired changes. The process generally begins with a careful review of the trust and consultation with affected family members. Next steps include preparing the petition, serving notice to beneficiaries and other interested parties, and scheduling a hearing if objections arise. The court examines the legal grounds and may request additional information. If the petition is granted, the court issues an order that becomes part of the trust’s administration record.
Understanding common terms helps clients follow the petition process. Definitions include settlor, trustee, beneficiary, trustee powers, amendment, decanting, curative petition, and successor trustee. Municipal or county procedural terms may also appear in filings. Knowing these terms helps in evaluating documents, recognizing the roles of interested parties, and understanding court orders. We provide clear explanations of terms most relevant to trust modification, including how California statutes define authority to amend trusts, requirements for notice, and criteria the court considers when evaluating whether a modification should be approved.
The settlor is the individual who created the trust and established its terms, assets, and distribution objectives. The settlor may retain powers to amend or revoke the trust while alive if those powers are expressly granted in the trust document. If the settlor is incapacitated or deceased, modification often requires either beneficiary agreement under specific statutory authority or a court petition to alter the trust for reasons such as correcting errors, addressing changed circumstances, or implementing previously intended tax planning. Identifying the settlor’s expressed intent is a central concern in modification proceedings.
Decanting refers to the process of transferring assets from one trust into a new trust with different terms using authority provided by statute or by the trust instrument. This option can allow trustees to adjust administrative provisions, clarify distribution language, or improve fiduciary powers without a court petition when the trust grants appropriate authority. Decanting is useful when changes are desired but the settlor is unavailable to amend the original trust. The transfer must comply with statutory limits and notice requirements to protect beneficiary rights and support a transparent administration process.
The trustee is the person or entity responsible for managing trust assets and carrying out the terms of the trust in accordance with the settlor’s instructions and applicable law. Trustees owe duties such as loyalty, impartiality, and prudence when administering trust property, making distributions, and interacting with beneficiaries. When conflicts arise about trustee actions or when amendments are needed to adjust administrative powers, a petition may seek to clarify trustee authority or replace a trustee. Courts review trustee conduct and any proposed changes with an eye toward protecting beneficiary interests.
A curative petition is filed to remedy defects in a trust instrument or its administration that interfere with proper execution of the settlor’s intent. Such petitions seek court approval to validate technical corrections, remove ambiguities, or confirm the validity of provisions that otherwise might be challenged. Curative relief can help avoid later disputes over distributions or trustee powers by obtaining a judicial declaration that clarifies the trust’s meaning and confirms the appropriate administration steps. Courts consider evidence about the settlor’s intent and the practical consequences of granting relief.
When addressing trust issues, clients may choose from alternatives such as informal amendment by the settlor, beneficiary agreement, decanting, or a court-filed modification petition. Each approach has benefits and limitations depending on the trust language, settlor capacity, and the degree of consensus among beneficiaries. Informal amendments are efficient when the settlor is able and willing. Beneficiary agreements can work when all parties consent. Decanting may be an option when trustees have statutory authority. When disputes, incapacity, or legal defects present obstacles, a court petition provides a formal mechanism to achieve a binding resolution under California law.
A direct amendment by the settlor is appropriate when the settlor has retained the power to change the trust and is mentally capable of signing a valid amendment. This avoids court involvement and typically results in faster implementation of changes. Amendments are ideal for updates that do not affect third party rights or that do not create ambiguity in distributions. It is important to follow any execution formalities specified in the trust document and in state law so the amendment is enforceable. Careful drafting helps minimize future disagreements among beneficiaries or trustees.
When all beneficiaries and interested parties consent to a modification in writing, they may be able to execute the change without seeking court approval, provided statutory requirements are met. Such consensual agreements can save time and reduce cost, while preserving the settlor’s original goals to the extent possible. Written agreements should clearly describe the modification, address tax implications if any, and provide for appropriate notice. Even when parties agree, documenting the change carefully is important to prevent future disputes and to ensure administrators have a clear record of the revised terms.
When family dynamics are complicated or assets involve business interests, real property, or retirement accounts, a comprehensive legal review helps ensure proposed modifications align with broader estate planning goals and legal duties. Complex scenarios raise questions about tax consequences, creditor rights, successor trustee powers, and potential beneficiary objections. A thoughtful legal approach evaluates alternative strategies, anticipates potential challenges, and prepares supporting documentation. This level of preparation can reduce the risk of costly litigation, preserve the settlor’s intent, and provide a clear roadmap for trustees responsible for implementing changes.
Where beneficiaries disagree about proposed revisions or where trustee conduct is contested, court intervention through a petition may be necessary to resolve conflicting interests and obtain a binding decision. A comprehensive legal approach includes gathering evidence, preparing persuasive declarations, and presenting legal arguments to explain why a modification should be allowed. Addressing objections proactively and coordinating notice to interested parties helps the court consider the matter efficiently. The goal is to obtain an order that affords clarity and finality, reducing ongoing conflict and facilitating proper trust administration.
A comprehensive approach to trust modification balances legal precision with practical administration considerations, helping to avoid pitfalls that could derail a settlor’s intentions. Thorough review and careful drafting reduce ambiguity, identify unintended tax or creditor consequences, and help ensure trustee actions are consistent with newly adopted terms. Engaging in a complete process that includes notice, documentation, and legal argument provides beneficiaries and trustees with a clear record, which aids in long term trust administration and reduces the chance of challenge or misunderstanding.
When a modification petition is handled thoroughly, the court order or documented amendment stands up to future scrutiny and supports efficient management of trust assets. This approach also tends to preserve family relationships by addressing concerns transparently and creating legally enforceable results. For trustees, a clear order reduces uncertainty about discretionary decisions, distributions, and successor appointments. For beneficiaries, it provides reassurance that their rights have been considered and that the trust will be administered consistently with the settled intent documented in the revised instrument.
A formal petition that results in a court order removes doubt about the validity of the modification and strengthens enforceability. The court’s review confirms that changes are supported by evidence and legal authority, which reduces the risk of later challenges. This certainty benefits trustees who must follow the revised terms and beneficiaries who rely on the trust for distributions. Proper documentation of the process also creates a reliable record for estate administration, tax reporting, and any future inquiries about the trust’s formation and modifications.
When modifications are processed with thorough notice, documentation, and adherence to legal standards, the potential for future disagreements is diminished. Clear court orders or well-drafted amendments make intentions plain and reduce misunderstandings among beneficiaries or trustees. This stability is particularly valuable when trust assets are diverse or long-term arrangements such as trusts for minors, special needs support, or pet trusts are involved. A preventive approach can protect family relationships and preserve estate value by minimizing unnecessary litigation and administrative contests.
Before pursuing a modification, read the trust instrument thoroughly to identify any clauses that limit amendments, require specific formalities, or outline successor trustee procedures. Pay attention to provisions that address settlor powers, trustee duties, and beneficiary consent. Noting these details early helps determine whether an out-of-court amendment, decanting, or a court petition is the appropriate route. Careful document review also reveals whether additional estate planning documents like a pour-over will, certification of trust, or powers of attorney must be updated in tandem with the requested modification.
Maintaining a clear paper trail supports any petition and demonstrates the basis for requested changes. Compile documentation such as medical or financial records, correspondence that reflects settlor intent, and records of trustee actions that necessitate correction. Clear records help the court evaluate the reasons for modification and strengthen your position if objections are raised. Organized documentation also assists trustees in implementing the revised terms smoothly and provides beneficiaries with transparency about why changes were made and how they will affect distributions and administration.
Consider a petition when a trust contains ambiguous language that hinders administration, when trustee authority is unclear or disputed, or when unforeseen changes make the original terms impracticable. A petition may also be appropriate to correct drafting errors that misstate the settlor’s intent or to address newly discovered assets that were not incorporated into the original trust. Where beneficiaries or trustees disagree about administration or distribution, a petition provides a formal avenue for resolution and helps establish a definitive order to guide future handling of trust affairs.
Other reasons to seek a petition include updating trust provisions to reflect major life changes such as remarriage, divorce, births, or significant shifts in financial circumstances that alter the settlor’s distribution goals. Petitioning the court can be necessary when the settlor lacks capacity to amend the trust directly or when an amendment might be challenged. In such situations, the court can evaluate the evidence of intent, interpret unclear provisions, and issue a clear order that facilitates effective administration and reduces the risk of future disputes.
Frequent circumstances that lead to petitions include trustee removal or replacement, ambiguous distribution instructions, errors in beneficiary descriptions, and unexpected tax or creditor issues that require correction. Problems can also arise when asset records are incomplete or when the settlor’s wishes were not fully reflected in the original drafting. When these problems affect the trust’s ability to operate or create conflict among beneficiaries, a petition can resolve the legal questions and authorize practical steps to implement the settlor’s intended plan.
Ambiguities in distribution language or conflicting trustee instructions can paralyze administration and lead to disputes between beneficiaries and trustees. When terms cannot be harmonized through interpretation alone, a court petition may be necessary to clarify the settlor’s intent or to reconcile conflicting provisions. The petition should present evidence of the settlor’s purpose, the context of the drafting, and any relevant communications that shed light on intended meanings. A judicial determination provides a binding resolution and enables trustees to proceed with confidence.
Situations involving trustee misconduct, incapacity, or inability to serve can create urgency to modify trustee terms or appoint a successor. A petition can request removal or replacement of a trustee, clarify successor appointment procedures, or adjust powers to ensure proper stewardship of trust assets. Documents and evidence supporting the request should focus on protecting beneficiary interests and restoring effective administration. Court involvement may be necessary to authorize changes that preserve the trust’s purpose and enable continued management of assets without further disruption.
Significant changes in family structure, health, finances, or tax law can make original trust provisions less suitable. A petition can realign distributions or administrative provisions to address these changes while keeping the settlor’s goals central. Tax or creditor concerns may require precise modifications to preserve estate value or to protect beneficiaries. The petition process gives the court a chance to review the proposed adjustments and confirm that the modifications are appropriate under the law and consistent with the purpose of the trust.
We serve clients across Morgan Hill and the surrounding Santa Clara County communities, providing guidance on trust modification petitions and related estate planning needs. Our office assists with evaluating trust documents, preparing petitions and supporting declarations, coordinating notices to interested parties, and representing clients in court when needed. We work to make the process as clear and manageable as possible, helping clients understand how proposed changes affect beneficiaries and trustees while ensuring compliance with California probate procedures and timelines.
Clients choose our firm for practical, client-focused service that addresses both legal and personal aspects of trust modification matters. We prioritize clear communication, careful document preparation, and a realistic evaluation of alternatives such as nonjudicial amendments or decanting where appropriate. Our approach emphasizes minimizing conflict, protecting family relationships where possible, and securing outcomes that support long-term administration of trusts. We guide clients step by step through notice requirements, filings, and court proceedings as necessary to achieve a stable resolution.
When court action is required, we prepare thorough petitions that explain the factual basis for requested modifications and the legal authority supporting them. We make sure interested parties receive proper notice and help clients anticipate potential objections. By providing practical recommendations and detailed documentation, we aim to obtain clear judicial rulings that trustees can follow and beneficiaries can rely upon. Our work includes coordinating updates to related estate planning documents when modifications create downstream implications for wills, powers of attorney, or beneficiary designations.
We also assist clients with preventative measures to reduce the likelihood of future disputes, such as preparing clear trust language, documenting settlor intent, and advising on trustee powers and successor provisions. When appropriate we prepare ancillary documents like certification of trust, pour-over wills, HIPAA authorizations, and guardianship nominations to ensure the broader estate plan remains consistent and functional after any trust changes. Our goal is to provide practical legal guidance that promotes smooth administration and peace of mind for families in Morgan Hill.
Our process begins with a consultation to review the trust document, learn about family and financial circumstances, and evaluate whether a petition is necessary. We then identify interested parties, gather supporting documentation, and prepare a petition with clear factual declarations and a proposed order. If notice or additional filings are required, we coordinate those steps and, when appropriate, pursue settlement discussions to avoid contested hearings. When court intervention is necessary, we represent clients at hearings and work toward a final order that clarifies the trust’s terms and administration.
The first step is a careful review of the trust instrument and related estate planning documents to determine the scope of the issue and possible remedies. We identify ambiguous clauses, check for amendment powers, and locate successor trustee provisions and beneficiary designations. This assessment includes evaluating whether nonjudicial options like decanting or beneficiary agreements are viable, or whether a court petition is required. Gathering complete documentation early enables us to form a clear strategy and prepare the necessary factual support for any petition.
We collect trust instruments, amendments, deeds, account statements, correspondence, and any medical or financial records that support the need for modification. Accurate records help demonstrate the context for requested changes and show how the trust currently operates. These materials form the backbone of the petition and are essential for addressing potential objections. Maintaining organized records also assists trustees in implementing changes and provides beneficiaries with transparency about the reasons for proposed modifications.
Identifying all beneficiaries, potential heirs, and other interested parties is crucial because California law often requires notice before certain trust proceedings. We prepare and serve notices in accordance with statutory requirements, explaining the nature of the petition and how it may affect rights or distributions. Proper notice reduces the risk of later procedural challenges and gives interested parties the opportunity to respond or participate in resolving the matter, which can sometimes lead to agreement without a contested hearing.
Once documents are gathered and parties identified, we draft the petition and supporting declarations that explain the facts and the legal basis for modification. The petition includes a clear description of the requested change, references to relevant trust provisions, and a proposed order for the court to sign. Filing the petition with the probate court initiates the formal process and sets deadlines for responses. We handle all procedural requirements to ensure filings are complete and compliant with local rules and statutory timelines.
Declarations provide the factual foundation for the petition, describing circumstances that justify modification such as drafting errors, changed conditions, or trustee issues. We assist clients in compiling declarations from witnesses, trustees, and other informed parties, ensuring the narrative is coherent and supported by documentary evidence. Well-crafted declarations help the court understand the practical implications of the proposed modification and demonstrate that the requested relief is appropriate under the law and consistent with the settlor’s intent.
After filing, we serve the petition and notice to interested parties and monitor responses and potential objections. If objections arise, we pursue negotiation where feasible and prepare for court proceedings when necessary. Managing this phase includes scheduling hearings, submitting briefing or supplemental declarations, and advising clients on settlement options and litigation risks. Prompt and professional handling of responses protects client interests and positions the petition for an efficient resolution, whether by agreement or court decision.
The final phase includes court hearings if objections prevent settlement, obtaining an order approving the modification, and implementing the court’s directives. After a successful petition, we assist with updating trust records, notifying financial institutions, and preparing any ancillary documents needed to reflect the revised terms. Implementation also involves advising trustees on how to carry out distributions and ongoing administration under the new order. Our work ensures that the court’s decision becomes an effective tool for consistent and lawful trust management.
If a hearing is required, we represent clients in court, present declarations and legal arguments, and respond to objections raised by other parties. The goal is to secure an order that accurately reflects the relief granted and provides clear guidance for trustees and beneficiaries. After the court issues its order, we help prepare certified copies, file them with necessary institutions, and advise on next steps to ensure assets and accounts are aligned with the modified terms.
Following a court order, practical tasks include updating trust records, communicating the changes to beneficiaries and trustees, and ensuring financial institutions accept the revised terms. We assist in drafting or revising related estate planning documents that may be affected, such as pour-over wills, powers of attorney, and certifications of trust. A careful post-order plan helps trustees carry out the trust according to the court’s directives and reduces the likelihood of further misunderstandings or administrative delays.
Common reasons for filing a trust modification petition include ambiguous language that impedes administration, errors in the trust document that misstate the settlor’s intent, and changed circumstances that make original provisions unworkable. Other grounds include disputes over trustee authority, the need to appoint or remove a trustee, newly discovered assets that were not included in the original trust, or tax and creditor concerns that require adjustment. A petition allows the court to review the situation and authorize changes that support the trust’s purposes. The petition process requires careful factual and legal explanation to demonstrate why modification is warranted. The court examines the trust terms, any available evidence of the settlor’s intent, and the practical ramifications for beneficiaries and trustees. When modifications preserve the settlor’s intended plan or remedy drafting defects, the court is often willing to issue an order that clarifies or corrects the trust for future administration.
Beneficiaries can sometimes agree to modify a trust without court involvement if the trust document or California law allows nonjudicial settlement agreements and all interested parties consent in writing. Such agreements are useful when all beneficiaries and trustees share the same objectives and when the proposed change does not conflict with the settlor’s expressed intent. Proper documentation is essential to ensure the modification is enforceable and prevents later disputes among parties who may not have been fully informed. Even with unanimous consent, it is important to follow statutory procedures and to document the agreement carefully. In some cases, obtaining a court order is advisable because it provides formal validation of the change, especially where there may be tax, creditor, or other legal implications. A court order creates a clear, enforceable record that trustees and institutions can rely on during administration.
The timeline for a trust modification petition varies depending on complexity, the number of interested parties, and whether objections arise. Simple petitions with cooperative parties and straightforward issues may be resolved within a few months, while contested matters that require hearings or additional discovery can extend significantly. Factors such as court schedules, the need for supplemental evidence, and the availability of parties for depositions or hearings all affect the overall duration. Preparing a thorough petition and providing clear notice to interested parties can help shorten the timeline by reducing surprises and facilitating settlement. When disputes are likely, early negotiation or mediation may also resolve issues more quickly than litigation. Throughout the process, clients should expect the firm to manage filings and communications to keep the matter moving efficiently toward resolution.
A court hearing is not always required for a trust modification petition, particularly when there is no opposition and the judge can rule based on the written petition and supporting declarations. However, if any interested party objects or raises questions about the proposed change, a hearing may be scheduled so the court can evaluate testimony and arguments. The presence of complex factual disputes, trustee conduct concerns, or significant financial implications increases the likelihood of a hearing being necessary. Even when a hearing is not required, careful preparation remains important because the judge will review the submitted materials and make a determination. Ensuring that declarations and documentary evidence clearly support the requested relief improves the chance of a prompt ruling without a contested hearing.
If a trustee refuses to make an amendment you believe is necessary, affected parties may seek judicial relief by filing a petition with the probate court. The petition can request authority to modify the trust, to remove or replace the trustee, or to clarify trustee duties and powers. The court will consider the trustee’s actions in light of legal duties and the best interests of the beneficiaries and may issue orders that direct appropriate adjustments to administration or personnel. Before pursuing court action, it often makes sense to request clarification or mediation to attempt a cooperative resolution. If those efforts fail, a petition formalizes the dispute and gives the court the authority to resolve it. Properly documenting the reasons for change and the trustee’s conduct helps support the petition and increases the likelihood of a decisive ruling.
Modifying a trust can have tax implications depending on the nature of the change, the type of trust involved, and the assets affected. Changes that alter beneficial interests, income distribution schedules, or grantor trust status may affect income tax, estate tax, or gift tax considerations. It is important to evaluate any proposed modification with awareness of potential tax consequences and to consult tax professionals when complex financial issues are implicated. When preparing a petition, the legal team will consider tax impacts and coordinate with advisors as necessary to structure changes that minimize negative consequences. Clear documentation that explains the purpose of the modification and how it aligns with estate planning goals helps in assessing tax treatment and ensuring the revised plan protects the estate and beneficiaries to the greatest extent possible.
Yes, a trust modification petition can correct drafting errors discovered after the settlor’s death when those errors prevent proper administration or misstate the settlor’s intent. The petition should present evidence that explains the nature of the mistake and why the proposed correction aligns with what the settlor intended. Courts consider documentary evidence, correspondence, and other indicia of intent to determine whether curative relief is appropriate to correct the error and honor the settlor’s true objectives. Corrective petitions must be carefully prepared with supporting declarations and documents. The court will balance the need to preserve testamentary intent with the requirement to protect beneficiary rights and ensure fairness. When successful, a curative order clarifies the trust and enables trustees to administer assets consistently with the settlor’s intended plan.
Evidence that supports a trust modification petition can include the original trust instrument and any amendments, correspondence or notes that reflect the settlor’s intent, financial records showing asset composition, and witness declarations that explain the context of certain provisions. Medical records or documents demonstrating incapacity can be relevant when the settlor’s ability to amend is at issue. Evidence must be organized and presented in a way that helps the court understand both the legal and factual reasons for the requested change. Affidavits or declarations from trustees, beneficiaries, or professional advisors who were involved in drafting or administering the trust can strengthen the petition. The more coherent and well-documented the factual narrative, the easier it is for the court to assess whether the modification serves the trust’s purpose and complies with governing statutes.
Interested parties are notified about a petition through formal service procedures required by California probate rules. Notices typically include the petition, supporting documents, and information about how the proposed modification could affect rights or distributions. Proper service gives parties an opportunity to review the request and to file objections or appear in court if they wish. Meeting notice requirements is essential to avoid procedural challenges and to allow the court to consider all viewpoints before deciding on the petition. In some cases, additional notice to known heirs, creditors, or other potentially affected parties may be required. Our firm manages service and ensures that notices comply with statutory deadlines and local court rules, thereby preserving the integrity of the process and protecting client interests throughout the proceeding.
After the court grants a trust modification petition, the judge issues an order that describes the approved changes and provides instructions for administration under the revised terms. Parties receive certified copies of the order, which trustees present to financial institutions and other custodians to implement new distribution or management instructions. The order serves as the authoritative document guiding future actions and reducing uncertainty about trustee powers and beneficiary rights. Following entry of the order, practical steps include updating trust records, notifying beneficiaries and institutions, and addressing any related estate planning documents affected by the modification. We assist clients with these administrative tasks to ensure a smooth transition and consistent implementation of the court-approved changes.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas