A Heggstad petition can be an effective legal remedy when assets are not properly transferred to a trust after the trustmaker’s death. At the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman in Santa Clara, we help families understand when a Heggstad petition may be appropriate, how the process works in California courts, and what evidence is typically required to show that assets should be treated as trust property. This page explains the core concepts of a Heggstad petition, common scenarios that prompt filing, and practical steps to evaluate whether this remedy fits your estate administration needs in Santa Clara County.
Although discussing estate matters can feel overwhelming, clear information helps families make timely decisions. A Heggstad petition is sometimes used when a deceased person intended to fund a trust but failed to complete formal transfer steps for certain assets. The petition asks the court to recognize those assets as trust property so the trustee can manage or distribute them according to the trust terms. This guide outlines what to expect from the process, possible timelines in Santa Clara County, and how the trust’s documents and surrounding circumstances influence the outcome for beneficiaries and fiduciaries.
A Heggstad petition can bring clarity and resolution when trust funding was incomplete or assets were overlooked. By seeking a court determination that specific assets belong to a trust, heirs and trustees can avoid prolonged disputes, facilitate proper distribution, and ensure that the trust’s instructions are followed. The petition process can protect beneficiaries’ interests while allowing the trustee to exercise authority over assets without invoking full probate for every item. In many cases, this approach reduces delay and administrative burden, helping families move forward with final accounting and distribution consistent with the settlor’s documented intentions.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman represent clients in estate planning and trust administration matters in Santa Clara County and throughout California. Our approach focuses on clear communication, careful document review, and deliberate preparation of filings to present a persuasive record to the court. We work closely with trustees, beneficiaries, and family members to gather the relevant evidence that supports a Heggstad petition, including trust instruments, account records, transfer documents, and witness statements. Our goal is to resolve questions about trust ownership efficiently while protecting family relationships and minimizing contested litigation when possible.
A Heggstad petition asks the probate court to declare that certain assets should be treated as trust property despite not being formally transferred into the trust. California law recognizes that when a trustmaker intended to transfer an asset to a trust and took some steps toward that transfer, a court may correct the record to reflect the trust’s ownership. Proving intent and actions taken prior to death is central to the petition. Evidence can include copies of account forms, transfer paperwork, beneficiary designations, correspondence, and testimony that demonstrate the trustmaker’s plan to fund the trust during their lifetime or by pour-over will.
The success of a Heggstad petition often depends on detailed factual presentation. Courts evaluate whether the trustmaker manifested a clear intent to place the asset in trust and whether there were substantial steps taken toward accomplishing that goal. Filing involves drafting pleadings that explain the asset, describe the actions already completed, and attach supporting evidence. The process may involve service on interested parties and resolution of objections. Understanding how Santa Clara County courts handle these matters helps families set expectations for timing, potential disputes, and next steps if the petition is granted or contested.
A Heggstad petition is a judicial procedure that asks a probate or superior court to recognize that property should be treated as part of a decedent’s trust despite formal transfer having not occurred. The petition is grounded in evidence that the trustmaker intended the trust to receive the asset. California courts consider the totality of the circumstances, including documentation and actions taken before death, to determine whether correcting the title or granting relief is appropriate. When granted, the court’s order enables the trustee to manage and distribute the asset according to the trust terms, avoiding additional probate administration for that asset.
Critical elements of a Heggstad petition include showing the trust document, demonstrating the decedent’s intent to fund the trust, and presenting evidence of actions toward transferring ownership. Typical procedural steps include preparing the petition and supporting exhibits, serving interested parties, responding to any objections, and appearing for a hearing. The court may require declarations from witnesses, copies of account forms, and a narrative explaining the sequence of events. Attorneys often coordinate with financial institutions or title companies to obtain records that corroborate testimony, ensuring the petition presents a clear, persuasive case to the judge.
Understanding terminology helps navigate Heggstad matters. Important terms include settlor, trustee, beneficiary, pour-over will, trust funding, and informal transfer steps. A pour-over will can direct assets to a trust but may still require court action to transfer certain items. Trust funding refers to the act of transferring assets into the name of the trust or designating the trust as beneficiary. Recognizing how institutions title accounts and record ownership is essential when preparing documentation for a petition. This glossary clarifies language commonly used in pleadings and hearings so interested parties can better follow the process.
The settlor, often called the trustmaker, is the individual who creates a trust and establishes its terms. The settlor’s intent is central to a Heggstad petition because courts look for clear evidence that the settlor wanted specific property to be governed by the trust. Documents such as the trust instrument, communications with advisors, and transaction records can shed light on that intent. For purposes of a petition, demonstrating the settlor’s plan and actions to place assets in the trust helps the court decide whether to treat those assets as trust property despite formal transfer steps being incomplete at the time of death.
A pour-over will is a testamentary document that directs probate assets to ‘pour over’ into an existing trust when the estate is administered. While a pour-over will helps consolidate assets under the trust, it does not always avoid court involvement, and additional filings may be necessary to move specific assets. In Heggstad petition cases, a pour-over will can support the claim that the decedent intended trust distribution. Courts will evaluate whether the pour-over will, combined with other evidence, demonstrates that the asset was meant to become trust property and therefore should be administered under the trust terms.
Trust funding refers to the process of transferring assets into the legal ownership of a trust so the trustee can manage them according to the trust terms. Funding can include changing account registrations, retitling real estate, assigning interests, or designating the trust as beneficiary on retirement accounts and policies. When funding is incomplete at death, a Heggstad petition can be used to show that the settlor intended the assets to be held by the trust. Demonstrating the steps taken toward funding is a key part of establishing that intent for the court.
The trustee is the person or entity charged with administering trust assets for the benefit of beneficiaries under the trust’s terms. Beneficiaries are those entitled to receive benefits from the trust. Interested parties in a Heggstad petition may include trustees, beneficiaries, heirs, and any parties with potential claims on the assets. Courts require notice to interested parties so they can object or present evidence. Clear communication among these stakeholders and careful preparation of evidence help the court resolve whether particular assets should be recognized as trust property.
When assets were not properly transferred into a trust, families may consider different legal approaches. A Heggstad petition seeks a court order that treats assets as trust property based on the decedent’s intent and actions. Alternatives include full probate administration, negotiated settlement among heirs and beneficiaries, or informal transfers if all interested parties agree. Each option carries trade-offs in cost, timing, and potential conflict. A Heggstad petition can be more focused and cost-effective when the evidence supports trust ownership, while probating an estate may be necessary in cases with unclear intent or competing claims.
A limited approach like filing a Heggstad petition may be appropriate when documentation and circumstances clearly show the decedent intended to fund the trust and took some concrete steps toward that goal. Examples include signed account change forms, beneficiary designations naming the trust, or correspondence with financial institutions indicating transfer plans. When these elements exist, a focused petition can avoid full probate proceedings and allow trustees to bring assets into trust administration with court approval. The presence of corroborating evidence reduces uncertainty and supports a streamlined court determination.
When beneficiaries and other interested parties are willing to cooperate, a Heggstad petition can be resolved more quickly and with less expense. Cooperative resolution may involve stipulations, consent orders, or joint filings that streamline court review. Agreement reduces contested litigation and helps the trustee take prompt control of assets to meet distribution or management obligations. Even when disagreements exist, early communication and willingness to exchange records can lead to negotiated outcomes that make a limited judicial determination both practical and cost-effective compared with protracted probate litigation.
A comprehensive legal approach may be necessary when documentation is ambiguous or multiple parties claim ownership or entitlement to the same asset. In those situations, the court may require more extensive briefing, additional discovery, and careful advocacy to resolve factual disputes. Comprehensive representation involves preparing for contested hearings, coordinating evidence from financial institutions or title companies, and anticipating objections. When stakes are higher or relationships are strained, a thorough approach helps protect fiduciary duties and ensure the court receives a full and organized presentation of the facts and applicable legal principles.
Assets such as business interests, jointly held real property, or accounts with complex beneficiary designations can complicate a straightforward petition. Similarly, when assets span different states or involve out-of-state institutions, additional legal issues may arise. A comprehensive approach addresses these complexities by coordinating with third parties, obtaining necessary records, and potentially working with counsel in other jurisdictions. Preparing for these contingencies helps ensure that the petition accounts for all relevant legal and factual issues and reduces the risk of later disputes about asset ownership or administration.
A thorough approach to preparing a Heggstad petition produces clear documentation, reduces the likelihood of surprise objections, and can lead to more predictable results in court. Investing time to collect bank records, correspondence, transfer forms, and witness statements strengthens the factual narrative and demonstrates that the trustmaker intended the asset to be held by the trust. Well-organized exhibits and declarations make it easier for judges to see the basis for relief, which can shorten hearings and improve the chance of a favorable ruling that brings the asset under trust administration with minimal further litigation.
Comprehensive preparation also supports smooth post-judgment administration, since the court’s order can be used with financial institutions and title companies to retitle assets or change account registrations. This reduces administrative delays, provides clarity for trustees and beneficiaries, and helps accomplish the trustmaker’s distribution goals in a timely manner. Additionally, a careful approach anticipates potential objections and addresses them in the initial filing, which can minimize costly follow-up proceedings and preserve family relationships by resolving ownership questions efficiently.
When a petition is supported by a robust set of records and declarations, courts have a clearer basis for making findings about the settlor’s intent and the status of the asset. Thorough evidence reduces the chance that interested parties will raise new objections based on missing information, and it helps the judge resolve factual disputes without extensive discovery. This proactive strategy often leads to a more efficient hearing and can limit the scope of contested litigation, enabling trustees to proceed with administration and distribution according to the trust document.
A well-documented court order recognizing assets as trust property provides a clear authority for trustees to present to banks, title companies, and other institutions. This clarity makes it simpler to retitle accounts, transfer deeds, or access funds necessary for distribution or estate settlement. By addressing potential challenges ahead of time and obtaining a comprehensive order, trustees can avoid repeated interactions with institutions or reopening disputes later, allowing for a smoother and more predictable administration process that honors the trustmaker’s intentions.
Begin assembling relevant records as soon as possible because timely documentation strengthens a petition. Collect trust documents, account statements, change-of-title paperwork, beneficiary designation forms, and any written correspondence that reflects the trustmaker’s intent. Speaking with bank or brokerage representatives to obtain transaction records and account opening documents may be necessary. Detailed timelines and copies of communications can corroborate witness statements and help the court view the transfer steps in context. Early evidence collection also helps identify gaps and directs follow-up actions that may prevent delays in filing.
Organize exhibits and declarations so the judge can easily follow the sequence of events leading to the attempted funding. Label documents, create a clear index of exhibits, and include concise declarations that summarize the evidence and explain its importance. Clear presentation reduces judicial uncertainty and makes it easier for a court to recognize the trustmaker’s intent. Well-prepared filings also assist financial institutions when they review court orders for retitling or account access, helping move assets into trust administration efficiently after the petition is granted.
Families consider a Heggstad petition when assets intended for a trust were not fully retitled before the trustmaker’s death and a probate process seems avoidable. The petition focuses on recognizing particular assets as trust property so trustees can manage and distribute them without separate probate on each item. This approach can save time and expense compared with a full probate estate, provided the evidence supports trust ownership. It is particularly helpful when the trust’s terms are clear and the necessary documentation or testimony can demonstrate the decedent’s transfer intent and steps taken toward funding.
Another reason to pursue this remedy is to reduce potential family conflict by obtaining a definitive court determination rather than dealing with uncertain claims. A judicial order clarifying ownership gives trustees the authority needed to present documentation to banks and title companies and to complete distributions according to the trust. If multiple institutions or account types are involved, a consolidated order can facilitate consistent handling across entities and help trustees close administrative tasks more predictably and with greater confidence in the legal basis for their actions.
Typical scenarios prompting a Heggstad petition include situations where a decedent executed a trust and intended to fund it but died before retitling accounts or transferring deeds. Other circumstances involve account forms submitted but not completed, beneficiary designations not updated, or bank errors that left assets in the decedent’s individual name. Sometimes a pour-over will exists but institutions require a court order to release funds to the trust. Each situation requires careful review of records and communications to show the decedent’s plan and the steps taken toward accomplishing that plan.
A common issue arises when a trustmaker intended to move bank or brokerage accounts into trust but did not complete title changes. Institutions may continue to report assets in the decedent’s name, creating an apparent need for probate. In those circumstances, a petition can present evidence of intent and partial funding efforts to convince a court to recognize the account as belonging to the trust. Demonstrating contemporaneous actions and communications that show the settlor’s plan supports a judicial determination that aligns asset ownership with the trust terms.
Sometimes beneficiary designations or account forms were left incomplete, listing the decedent rather than the trust as beneficiary. Other times, paperwork was submitted but not fully processed by the financial institution. A Heggstad petition can address such gaps by showing evidence of the trustmaker’s intent and actions taken to complete beneficiary designations. Courts will consider whether the available records and testimony support treating the asset as trust property, and a favorable order allows the trustee to pursue proper administration consistent with the trustmaker’s aims.
Real estate may pose challenges when deeds were not transferred into the trust before death or when joint ownership and community property considerations complicate the record. A Heggstad petition can be used to clarify ownership when circumstances demonstrate the decedent intended the property to be a trust asset. Supporting evidence may include draft deeds, correspondence with title companies, or placement of the property in the settlor’s estate planning documents. Careful presentation helps courts determine whether equitable relief is appropriate to treat the property as part of the trust.
If you are facing an incomplete trust funding issue in Santa Clara County, the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman can help evaluate your situation and prepare the necessary court filings. We assist trustees, beneficiaries, and family members with gathering the documentation courts typically require and preparing clear, well-organized petitions. Working with local court procedures and Santa Clara County practices, we aim to present a persuasive record that supports recognition of trust ownership when appropriate. Contact our office to discuss the particular facts of your case and next steps toward resolution.
Our firm provides focused representation in trust administration and probate-related matters throughout Santa Clara County. We prioritize clear communication and careful preparation of legal filings to make the court’s work straightforward. We take the time to review trust instruments and related records, outline the factual narrative that supports a petition, and coordinate evidence-gathering from institutions and witnesses. By organizing documentation and presenting concise arguments, we strive to help trustees and beneficiaries obtain timely court determinations that reflect the trustmaker’s intentions.
We understand the practical steps required to present a Heggstad petition effectively in local courts. Our approach includes explaining the process, advising on gathering records, and preparing declarations and exhibits that clarify how the settlor attempted to fund the trust. We also work to anticipate and respond to potential objections, aiming to resolve disputes efficiently when possible. Because court procedures and institutional requirements vary, careful preparation and thoughtful presentation of the facts can make a meaningful difference in the outcome.
When families are navigating sensitive estate matters, we strive to balance legal advocacy with practical guidance and clear expectations. We help trustees understand their duties and responsibilities after a court determination, including steps to retitle accounts and distribute trust assets. Our office also communicates with third parties such as banks and title companies to facilitate post-judgment implementation. By providing attentive support from filing through to administration, we aim to help families resolve trust funding issues while preserving relationships and honoring the trustmaker’s intentions.
Our process begins with an intake meeting to understand the facts surrounding the alleged funding and to review the trust and related documents. We then identify the records needed from financial institutions, title companies, and other third parties and assist clients in obtaining those materials. After gathering evidence, we draft the petition, prepare declarations and exhibits, and serve required parties. If objections arise, we respond with additional documentation or legal briefing. We aim for thorough preparation to present a clear, organized case to the court and to facilitate post-order administration.
The first step involves a careful assessment of the trust instrument, estate planning documents, and any account paperwork to determine whether a petition is appropriate. We review deeds, account statements, beneficiary forms, and correspondence for evidence of intent. Next, we compile a list of necessary records and coordinate requests to institutions for transaction histories, change-of-title requests, and other supporting documents. Early collection helps identify gaps and informs the strategy for presenting the strongest possible petition to the court.
Examining the trust document and related estate planning materials is essential to frame the legal argument. We look for provisions that indicate intended distributions, powers granted to the trustee, and any language about funding. Contextual evidence such as correspondence with advisors, drafts of deeds, and notes about transfer plans can all be important. Establishing a clear narrative about the settlor’s intent helps the court understand why an exception to formal title requirements may be appropriate in order to give effect to the trust terms.
Gathering formal records from banks, brokerages, and title companies often requires targeted requests and sometimes subpoenas if institutions are slow to respond. These records can include account opening documents, signature cards, transfer forms, or internal notes showing attempted changes of ownership. Having these materials assembled and properly organized for filing strengthens the factual presentation and helps the court see the pattern of actions indicating the settlor’s intent to fund the trust. Cooperation from institutions expedites the process when possible.
Once records are compiled, we prepare a petition that sets forth the facts, legal basis, and requested relief. Supporting declarations and an index of exhibits explain the timeline and attach key documents that corroborate the settlor’s intent. Clear pleading helps the court quickly identify the assets in question and the grounds for a trust recognition order. We also prepare required notices and coordinate service on interested parties, ensuring procedural requirements are satisfied before a hearing is set in Santa Clara County.
Declarations from trustees, beneficiaries, and witnesses summarize the facts and refer to specific exhibits, providing the judge with a coherent narrative. An organized exhibit index helps the court and opposing parties locate supporting documents quickly. Declarations should be factual, concise, and properly authenticated to be persuasive. Clear organization and careful attention to evidentiary detail reduce the likelihood of delays caused by requests for additional documentation and help the court address the petition efficiently.
After filing, the petition is served on interested parties who may have a right to object. If objections arise, timely responses with additional records or legal argument may resolve issues without further litigation. Where disputes persist, we prepare for hearings and may seek continuances to secure more evidence. Responding proactively and professionally to objections can narrow contested matters and often leads to quicker resolution, while ensuring that all parties have a full opportunity to present their positions to the court.
At the hearing, the court reviews the petition, declarations, and exhibits and may hear argument from the parties. If satisfied that the evidence supports trust ownership, the judge will enter an order recognizing the asset as trust property. That order is then used to update account registrations, retitle deeds, or instruct institutions to release funds to the trustee. We assist trustees in presenting the order to relevant institutions and in completing any follow-up steps necessary for distribution, accounting, or further trust administration tasks.
After receiving a court order, trustees must present it to financial institutions or title companies to effect changes. Institutions often require certified copies, identification, and additional forms before retitling accounts or transferring deeds. Having the court order framed with clear language about the asset and the trustee’s authority simplifies institutional compliance. We work with trustees to ensure they understand each institution’s requirements and assist in communicating with third parties to complete asset transfers promptly and according to the court’s directive.
Once assets are recognized as trust property and retitled as needed, trustees can proceed with administration and distribution under the trust terms. This may include assembling final accountings, providing notices to beneficiaries, and making distributions. We provide guidance on trustee responsibilities, documentation required for distributions, and steps to close trust administration when appropriate. Clear post-judgment planning helps prevent future disputes and ensures the trustmaker’s objectives are fulfilled in an orderly manner.
A Heggstad petition is a court proceeding asking a judge to declare that certain assets should be treated as trust property despite not being formally retitled before the trustmaker’s death. Courts evaluate whether the trustmaker demonstrated an intent to place the asset in trust and whether meaningful steps toward transfer were taken. The petition attaches the trust document, relevant account records, declarations, and other evidence to show why the asset belongs with the trust rather than passing via probate. This remedy is used when the trustmaker’s intent and actions are sufficiently clear but formal transfer was incomplete. It helps trustees gain authority to manage and distribute assets under the trust without opening probate for each item. The proceeding focuses on the facts and documentation that support trust ownership, and parties can present objections or additional evidence before the court issues a ruling.
A Heggstad petition specifically seeks a judicial determination that particular assets are trust property, while probate is a broader court process that administers a decedent’s estate when assets are not held in trust. Probate typically involves appointing a personal representative, inventorying assets, paying debts, and distributing remaining property under probate law or the decedent’s will. By contrast, a Heggstad petition aims to incorporate specific assets into an existing trust so they can be handled under the trust’s terms without separate probate for those assets. The petition can therefore be a narrower, more targeted procedure focused on ownership questions rather than full estate administration. When successful, it allows trustees to avoid redundant probate steps for those assets, potentially saving time and expense relative to administering each asset through probate.
Useful evidence for a Heggstad petition includes the trust document itself, account statements, change-of-title forms, beneficiary designation forms, correspondence with financial institutions, and declarations from witnesses who can attest to the trustmaker’s intent and actions. Draft deeds, internal bank notes, and transaction histories showing attempted transfers can be particularly persuasive. The court looks for a pattern of behavior and documentary support that demonstrate the trustmaker intended the assets to become trust property. Witness declarations that explain the context and timeline, along with organized exhibits that highlight key documents, strengthen the petition. Courts consider the totality of the evidence, so assembling a coherent factual narrative with corroborating records increases the chances of a favorable determination that aligns ownership with the trust instrument.
Timing for a Heggstad petition in Santa Clara County varies depending on the complexity of the facts, the responsiveness of financial institutions, and whether objections are filed. A straightforward, uncontested petition with readily available records may be resolved more quickly, while contested matters or cases requiring additional discovery can take longer. The local court schedule and hearing availability also affect timing, and obtaining certified documents or institutional records can introduce delays if third parties are slow to respond. Preparing a complete petition with organized exhibits and declarations before filing can help shorten the timeline by reducing the need for supplemental filings. Early coordination with banks, title companies, and witnesses also speeds evidence collection. If contested, resolution may include hearings or additional briefing, which can extend the timeframe based on court availability and the complexity of contested factual issues.
Yes, beneficiaries and other interested parties can object to a Heggstad petition. Courts require notice to interested parties so they have an opportunity to respond and present evidence. Objections may challenge the sufficiency of the evidence, raise competing claims to the asset, or question the alleged transfer steps. When objections are filed, the petitioner may respond with additional documents or declarations to address the concerns raised and support the claim that the asset should be treated as trust property. If disputes persist, the court may hold a contested hearing that allows both sides to present testimony and documentary evidence. Resolving objections often involves developing a clear factual record and legal argument to persuade the judge to recognize the asset as part of the trust despite the absence of formal retitling prior to death.
A Heggstad petition determines ownership for trust administration purposes but does not by itself resolve tax liabilities or creditor claims. Creditors with valid claims against the decedent’s estate may still seek recovery, and tax consequences depend on the asset type and applicable rules. Trustees and heirs should be aware that court recognition of trust ownership may not insulate assets from legitimate creditor claims or reporting requirements, and additional steps may be required to address tax filings or creditor notices. When considering a petition, it is advisable to coordinate with counsel on potential tax or creditor issues and to ensure required notices are provided as part of the court process. Addressing these matters proactively helps minimize the risk of unexpected claims after transferring assets into trust administration.
After a court grants a Heggstad petition, the order serves as legal authority to treat the asset as trust property. Trustees can present the court order to financial institutions or title companies to retitle accounts or change registrations. The order guides the trustee in exercising authority to manage, invest, or distribute the asset under the trust’s terms. Trustees should follow institutional procedures for implementing the court order, which may include providing certified copies and completing additional forms. Subsequent steps often include updating account registrations, preparing trust accountings, and making distributions consistent with the trust. Trustees should document each administrative action and maintain records demonstrating compliance with the court order and the trust provisions to ensure transparent and defendable administration.
Most banks, brokerage firms, and title companies will comply with a valid court order, but compliance can require submission of certified documents, identification, and administrative forms. Institutions may review the order to ensure it clearly identifies the asset and the trustee’s authority. Occasionally, institutions raise additional questions or request further documentation before effectuating transfers. Anticipating these requirements and preparing the necessary paperwork in advance helps facilitate cooperation and reduces delays. If an institution refuses to comply, additional legal steps or further clarification from the court may be necessary. Working with counsel to present a clear, enforceable order and to respond to institutional requests typically resolves most compliance issues and enables trustees to complete the transfers required for trust administration.
The cost of a Heggstad petition varies with complexity, the amount of document collection required, and whether parties contest the matter. In many cases, a focused petition can be less costly than full probate because it addresses ownership of specific assets rather than administering an entire estate through probate procedures. However, contested petitions or those requiring extensive third-party records can increase time and expense, so the practical cost depends on the facts and level of opposition encountered. Careful upfront preparation to assemble records and address foreseeable objections can reduce litigation time and overall expense. Discussing the likely timeline and potential costs with counsel early helps trustees and beneficiaries weigh the advantages of pursuing a petition versus alternative approaches such as probate or negotiated settlement.
To begin, gather any trust documents, account statements, deeds, beneficiary designation forms, and correspondence that may show the trustmaker’s intent to fund the trust. Make a list of potential interested parties and identify institutions that hold the assets in question. Early organization of records allows counsel to assess the strength of a petition and determine what additional documents may be needed from banks or title companies. Contact a Santa Clara County practitioner experienced in trust administration matters to review your records and advise on next steps. A preliminary consultation can clarify whether a Heggstad petition is likely to be effective, outline the evidence required, and provide an estimate of timing and costs for preparing and filing the petition in the local court.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas