A Heggstad petition is a probate procedure in California used to confirm that assets which were intended to belong to a decedent’s living trust should be treated as trust assets despite not being formally transferred into the trust. If you live in Aptos Hills-Larkin Valley or nearby communities and discover property that was meant to be in a trust but remains titled in the decedent’s name, a Heggstad petition can help avoid a full probate administration. The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman, serving San Jose and Santa Cruz County, assists families in reviewing trust documents, gathering supporting evidence, and preparing the petition to present to the court in order to reflect the decedent’s clear estate planning intentions.
Many families only discover untitled assets when arranging the decedent’s affairs. The Heggstad process focuses on establishing intent, often relying on trust language, declarations, beneficiary designations, and other contemporaneous documents and actions showing that the asset should have been transferred. At the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman we provide careful review of trust instruments such as revocable living trusts, pour-over wills, and related estate planning documents to determine the most appropriate approach. We explain the timeline and evidence needed, and coordinate with banks, title companies, and other parties to support a petition that seeks to place assets under the trust without a more prolonged probate.
A Heggstad petition can reduce delay, expense, and public administration associated with probate by providing a legal mechanism to recognize assets as trust property when transfer formalities were not completed. For families in Aptos Hills-Larkin Valley, this can mean quicker access to bank accounts, title transfers for real property, and continuity in managing the decedent’s affairs. The petition helps clarify property ownership for third parties who may be reluctant to release funds or transfer deeds. By focusing on documentary and circumstantial evidence of intent, a properly prepared petition can restore the estate plan’s intended distribution without subjecting assets to a full probate process, preserving privacy and conserving estate resources.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman assists clients throughout Santa Cruz County and the greater San Jose area in resolving trust transfer issues and preparing Heggstad petitions. Our practice focuses on clear, practical legal support for estate planning and post-death administration matters. We review trust documents such as revocable living trusts, pour-over wills, and supporting instruments like advance health care directives and powers of attorney to assemble persuasive evidence of intent. We work closely with fiduciaries, family members, banks, title companies, and other professionals to present a thorough petition that advances the client’s objectives while minimizing delay and procedural risks in court proceedings.
A Heggstad petition asks the probate court to find that certain assets are trust property even though title was not retitled into the trust during the decedent’s lifetime. The petition relies on California case law and Probate Code provisions to establish that the decedent intended the asset to be held by the trust. Evidence commonly used includes the trust document itself, beneficiary designations, statements by the settlor, transfer attempts, beneficiary or trustee conduct, and related estate planning documents such as pour-over wills and certification of trust. The goal is to align the legal title with the settlor’s documented estate plan without opening a full probate estate.
The petition typically identifies the asset, describes why it was intended for the trust, and requests a court order recognizing it as trust property. Courts consider both written documentation and the totality of conduct surrounding the asset. Successful petitions can lead to the clearance of bank accounts, transfer of real property, or formal acknowledgment enabling trustees to administer those assets under the trust terms. The process can be tailored based on the asset type and the cooperation of third parties, and may involve negotiating with financial institutions or title companies prior to filing to streamline resolution.
A Heggstad petition seeks a judicial determination that specified assets belong to a decedent’s trust despite a failure to complete formal transfer steps. It is grounded in a legal analysis of intent and aims to prevent unintended probate administration. The petition will identify assets, present supporting documentation, and request an order to treat those assets as trust property, often enabling trustees to exercise powers under the trust instrument. This remedy helps families and fiduciaries align asset title with the settlor’s plan and can reduce administrative complexity, costs, and public disclosure compared with a full probate estate.
Preparation of a Heggstad petition involves collecting trust documents, related estate planning instruments such as pour-over wills, evidence of the settlor’s intent, account statements, deeds, beneficiary forms, and communications showing transfer attempts. A clear narrative is developed to explain why each asset should be treated as trust property. The petition is filed with supporting declarations and exhibits, served to interested parties, and may prompt responses or negotiations. In many cases courts grant the requested relief after reviewing the record, allowing trustees to manage and distribute assets according to the trust without a lengthy probate.
Understanding common terminology helps estate representatives, family members, and fiduciaries navigate the Heggstad process. Terms like trust settlor, trustee, beneficiary, pour-over will, certification of trust, and probate court order frequently arise. Knowing what each term means and how it relates to title transfer and asset administration reduces confusion and streamlines communication with financial institutions and the court. This glossary outlines definitions and how these concepts interact in practice, providing practical clarity for those managing a trust administration or preparing a petition to confirm trust ownership of specific assets.
The settlor is the person who created the trust and placed assets within it during life. The settlor’s intent and written trust provisions are central to a Heggstad petition because the petition asks the court to enforce the settlor’s plan when formal title transfer did not occur. Evidence of the settlor’s intent can include the trust document itself, related estate planning instruments, and statements indicating the settlor’s desire for the asset to be administered under the trust. Identifying and demonstrating the settlor’s intent is a foundational step in seeking court recognition of trust ownership for an asset.
A Heggstad petition is a request filed in probate court to establish that particular property should be treated as trust property notwithstanding that it was not formally transferred into the trust before the settlor’s death. The petition relies on a factual showing of intent and documentary support to persuade the court that the asset was meant to be part of the trust. If granted, the court issues an order enabling trustees to administer and distribute the asset according to the trust, avoiding a separate probate proceeding for those assets and preserving privacy and efficiency in estate administration.
The trustee is the individual or entity charged with administering the trust according to its terms and for the benefit of the beneficiaries. The trustee plays an important role in a Heggstad petition by presenting the facts and documents showing the asset was intended for the trust and seeking court approval to exercise trust powers over that asset. Trustees must act in accordance with fiduciary duties while pursuing legal remedies that protect trust assets and ensure proper distribution in line with the settlor’s instructions.
A pour-over will is a will designed to transfer any assets not already held by the trust at the settlor’s death into the trust, thereby ‘pouring over’ the remaining estate to be administered under the trust’s terms. While a pour-over will can direct property to the trust, it does not substitute for retitling assets during life. When assets remain untitled and a pour-over will exists, a Heggstad petition may be used to demonstrate intent that the asset belonged to the trust and to avoid separate probate for those items where appropriate.
When untitled assets are discovered after death, families can consider different remedies. Probate is one route but often involves public procedures, additional time, and increased administrative costs. A Heggstad petition offers a targeted method to establish trust ownership and avoid broader probate administration when clear evidence of intent exists. Alternative remedies may include corrective transfers, affidavits, or negotiated arrangements with financial institutions, depending on asset type and institutional policies. Evaluating the best approach requires review of documents, asset value, beneficiary interests, and the willingness of third parties to cooperate in completing transfers without court intervention.
For modest-value accounts or assets where banks and title companies have straightforward procedures to transfer funds to a trustee with minimal court involvement, a limited approach may suffice. Documentation such as a certification of trust, death certificate, and trust provisions often allows institutions to release funds or retitle accounts. In these situations, initiating direct institution-level transfers and using trustee powers can resolve matters without filing a Heggstad petition. Each institution’s policies differ, so gathering required forms and clear trust documentation is an important first step to determine whether a court filing is necessary.
When beneficiaries and potential interested parties agree that an asset was intended for the trust and are willing to cooperate, informal resolution or administrative transfers are often achievable. Cooperation reduces the need for contested court proceedings and can expedite access to funds and property. Trustees can present the necessary trust documents and declarations to institutions, which may accept the proof and process transfers. Such collaborative circumstances often make a limited administrative approach preferable, saving time and costs while achieving the settlor’s intended distribution.
If ownership is contested by family members, creditors, or other parties, or if the factual record is complex, a comprehensive legal approach is often necessary. Preparing a Heggstad petition in contested circumstances requires careful collection of declarations, contemporaneous evidence, and legal argument to persuade the court that the asset was meant to be part of the trust. A thorough legal presentation helps address opposing claims and reduce the risk that the asset will be treated as a probate estate item subject to different distribution rules. Courts weigh competing evidence, so a comprehensive, well-documented petition improves the likelihood of a favorable determination.
High-value assets or property with complicated title histories benefit from a more robust legal approach. When real estate, substantial accounts, or retirement assets are involved, ensuring that the transfer is lawful and recognized by third parties requires obtaining a court determination in some cases. A detailed petition that addresses chain of title, beneficiary designations, and related documents helps secure clear title and mitigates risk for trustees and beneficiaries. When the stakes are significant, court resolution can provide certainty and protect estate resources from prolonged disputes or challenges.
A comprehensive petition promotes legal clarity and can prevent future disputes by obtaining a formal court order recognizing assets as trust property. This court recognition simplifies administration, helps trustees carry out trust terms without uncertainty, and can remove barriers imposed by institutions hesitant to release funds. For beneficiaries, a clear process can preserve estate value and reduce the need for future litigation. Comprehensive preparation also anticipates opposing arguments and addresses evidentiary needs, creating a persuasive record that supports the settlor’s documented intent and expedites final resolution.
When a petition is well-supported by documents, declarations, and procedural compliance, courts are more likely to grant relief quickly, enabling trustees to move forward with administration and distribution. A thorough approach also helps manage relationships with banks, title companies, and other institutions by presenting a coherent legal basis for trust ownership. This reduces the likelihood of delays or additional challenges later in administration. Overall, securing a court order provides lasting clarity and helps ensure the settlor’s intentions are honored in an efficient, legally sound manner.
Obtaining a judicial order confirming trust ownership removes questions about title and authority to manage assets, giving trustees the legal foundation to act. Courts can issue specific directions that clarify how assets should be treated, which reassures third parties and reduces the chance of subsequent disputes. Clear title is especially important for transactions such as selling real property or transferring accounts, because financial institutions and title companies frequently require authoritative documentation before completing major transactions. A court determination simplifies those processes and provides a stable basis for administration.
A thorough Heggstad petition process preserves estate value by avoiding potential probate costs and delays that can erode assets. It also protects beneficiary interests by ensuring distributions follow the settlor’s written instructions. When the court resolves ownership questions, beneficiaries gain confidence that estate resources will be distributed as intended and that trustees are authorized to manage assets lawfully. This reduces the likelihood of future disputes and supports efficient administration, helping families move forward while safeguarding the intended outcomes of estate planning documents.
Begin by assembling all trust-related documents, including the original trust instrument, any amendments, pour-over wills, certifications of trust, and related forms like powers of attorney and health care directives. Collect account statements, deeds, beneficiary designation forms, correspondence showing transfer attempts, and any notes that reflect the settlor’s intent. Organized documentation reduces the time needed to evaluate whether a Heggstad petition is necessary and strengthens the factual record if court action is required. Clear records also help institutions verify trust provisions and may enable administrative transfers without a court filing.
Assemble evidence that reflects the settlor’s intent to place the asset in the trust. This can include trust provisions naming the asset class, correspondence referencing the asset, meeting notes with advisors, or statements showing the settlor directed transfers. Declarations from trustees, beneficiaries, or professionals who worked with the settlor can support the factual narrative. Contemporaneous evidence is persuasive to courts and third parties, and it helps the petitioner establish that the asset was intended to be part of the trust even though title was not formally changed prior to the settlor’s passing.
Families consider a Heggstad petition when they need to align asset title with the settlor’s trust after discovering untitled property, when institutions will not transfer funds without a court order, or when avoiding a formal probate administration would conserve estate resources. The petition is helpful when documentary and circumstantial evidence supports an intention to include the asset in the trust, and when a streamlined court determination will protect beneficiary interests. It is also appropriate when clarity and legal authority for trustees are necessary to manage, sell, or transfer assets effectively in the course of trust administration.
Other reasons to consider this service include reducing public exposure of estate details, minimizing delays in securing funds needed for estate expenses, and resolving title issues that might otherwise impede transactions. A successful petition helps trustees exercise their duties with confidence and reduces the potential for future challenges. The process can be especially valuable when resources are limited and a full probate would unnecessarily consume estate value, or when heirs and beneficiaries seek a prompt, legally supported resolution consistent with the settlor’s documented plan.
Typical circumstances prompting a petition include discovery of bank accounts still in the decedent’s name, real property not retitled into the trust, retirement or brokerage accounts with outdated beneficiary designations, or situations where a pour-over will exists but transfer formalities were not completed. Other scenarios involve assets that were never properly deeded into the trust due to oversight, life changes, or administrative error. Each situation requires careful review to determine if evidence of intent is present and whether a petition would provide the appropriate legal remedy to avoid probate or resolve title questions.
Bank and brokerage accounts that remain in the decedent’s name often pose immediate obstacles to trustees who need access to funds for estate administration. Financial institutions commonly require specific documentation to release amounts to a trustee. When account holders intended those accounts to be trust property, a Heggstad petition can provide the court order that institutions require. Preparing a petition with account statements, trust provisions, and declarations demonstrating intent can help move the funds into trust administration without initiating a full probate estate, allowing trustees to pay obligations and distribute assets according to the trust.
Real property intended for a trust but left in the decedent’s individual name often complicates administration, sale, or refinancing. Title companies and lenders may insist on a court order or clear title before proceeding. A Heggstad petition seeks a judicial determination that the property should be considered trust property, enabling trustees to manage or transfer real estate under the trust terms. Careful review of deeds, prior transfer attempts, and the trust document helps build the record courts need to issue an order confirming ownership for trust administration purposes.
Assets with beneficiary forms or designation issues can create uncertainty about ownership at death. When retirement accounts, life insurance policies, or other assets have conflicting or outdated designations but evidence shows the settlor intended inclusion in the trust, a petition can reconcile those conflicts. The proceeding clarifies whether the asset should be administered under trust terms or pass outside the trust, and helps avoid competing claims. Presenting declarations and documentation that demonstrate the settlor’s consistent plan supports the court’s ability to issue an order matching the settlor’s intent.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman serves clients in Aptos Hills-Larkin Valley and throughout Santa Cruz County with practical solutions for trust transfer issues. We help gather the necessary documents and prepare petitions that reflect the settlor’s intent, coordinate with banks and title companies, and represent fiduciaries in court when required. Our goal is to reduce delay and expense while protecting the interests of trustees and beneficiaries. Residents can call our office at 408-528-2827 to discuss their situation, learn about options, and begin assembling the evidence needed for a petition or administrative transfer.
Families rely on careful legal guidance when addressing untitled trust assets and preparing court filings. We bring a practical approach to evaluating documents such as revocable living trusts, pour-over wills, and certifications of trust to determine the best resolution. Our representation emphasizes thorough preparation of petitions, clear factual narratives supported by declarations and exhibits, and coordination with institutions to reduce unnecessary litigation. We prioritize client communication, timely action, and cost-conscious solutions aimed at preserving estate resources and achieving prompt resolution for trustees and beneficiaries.
When court filings are needed, we prepare petitions that clearly identify assets, present the contemporaneous evidence of intent, and anticipate questions from the court or interested parties. We also evaluate whether administrative remedies might resolve matters without filing, and if so we pursue those avenues to avoid delays. For complex or contested circumstances we present factual and legal arguments designed to obtain a protective order recognizing trust ownership, enabling trustees to manage or distribute assets pursuant to the trust instrument and the settlor’s documented wishes.
Throughout the process we aim to reduce stress for families by explaining the likely steps, gathering required documentation, and representing clients in negotiations or hearings if necessary. Our practice is grounded in practical experience with estate planning documents and post-death administration, including related matters like trust modification petitions, Heggstad petitions, and pour-over will issues. We work to provide clear, cost-sensitive guidance so trustees and beneficiaries can move forward with administration in a structured and legally supported manner.
Our process begins with a focused review of the trust documents and the untitled assets to determine whether a petition is appropriate. We gather supporting records, prepare declarations and exhibits, and attempt administrative resolutions with banks or title companies when feasible. If court action is required we draft and file the petition, serve interested parties, and respond to any objections. We keep clients updated at each stage and work to obtain a timely order that enables trustees to administer the assets under the trust. The goal is to secure legal recognition of the settlor’s intent with minimal delay and cost.
The initial phase involves assembling all pertinent paperwork and evaluating whether the facts support a Heggstad petition. This includes locating the original trust, amendments, pour-over wills, deeds, account records, beneficiary forms, and any correspondence indicating the settlor’s intent. We interview fiduciaries and potential witnesses to document contemporaneous actions. The assessment determines the likelihood that an institutional transfer is possible without court involvement and, if not, identifies the evidence necessary for a persuasive petition to the probate court.
Collecting complete and organized records is essential. This includes the trust instrument and amendments, death certificates, deeds, bank and brokerage statements, beneficiary designations, and any communications reflecting the settlor’s intent to include assets in the trust. We also request institutional forms and policies to understand third-party requirements. A meticulous documentation effort builds a factual foundation for either an administrative transfer or a court petition and reduces surprises during the next stages of the legal process.
Before filing, we often contact banks, brokers, and title companies to determine what documentation they will accept and whether an administrative transfer is possible. If institutions are willing to proceed with the available paperwork, we may avoid filing a petition. If institutions insist on a court order, that refusal is documented as part of the petition record. Early outreach can save time and expense by clarifying requirements and potential obstacles for each asset under consideration.
If an administrative solution is not available, we prepare the Heggstad petition with supporting declarations and exhibits that explain why the asset should be considered trust property. The petition identifies the asset, outlines supporting evidence of intent, and requests a court order recognizing trust ownership. We ensure compliance with local rules for filing and service, and craft declarations from trustees, witnesses, or professionals who can attest to the settlor’s intent. This careful preparation helps the court and interested parties evaluate the request efficiently.
Drafting focuses on a clear factual narrative supported by documentary evidence and firsthand declarations. We include trust excerpts, account histories, deeds, correspondence, and statements from witnesses. The petition explains the legal basis for the requested relief and anticipates questions about chain of title and intent. Precise, well-organized exhibits and declarations help the court quickly assess the merits of the petition and facilitate a prompt resolution when the record is persuasive.
After filing, the petition must be served on interested parties in accordance with probate rules. The court then sets review or hearing dates and may require additional information. We manage procedural deadlines and respond to any requests from the court or opposing parties. Our goal is to present a complete and convincing record so the court can issue an order recognizing the asset as trust property, enabling trustees to proceed with administration without unnecessary adjournments or line-item objections.
Once the court reviews the petition and supporting evidence, it may grant an order recognizing the asset as trust property. That order is used to present clear authority to institutions and title companies, allowing trustees to take possession, transfer deeds, or disburse funds according to the trust. If objections arise, the court process addresses competing claims and produces a definitive resolution. Obtaining the order completes the legal validation that aligns asset title with the settlor’s trust and supports the trustee’s authority to manage and distribute the asset.
When the court issues its order, trustees receive formal recognition that specific assets are trust property. This order serves as authoritative documentation for banks, title companies, and other institutions and clears the path for trustees to act. The order may include directions for how assets should be treated, and it provides a legal basis to satisfy institutional policies that may have previously blocked transfers. With this judicial recognition, trustees can proceed with administration tasks such as paying debts, transferring deeds, or distributing funds.
Following entry of the order, trustees present it along with trust documents and identification to financial institutions and title companies to complete transfers and transactions. The court order typically resolves institutional hesitancy and enables final administrative steps such as changing title, closing accounts, or selling property in accordance with the trust. Trustees should retain copies of the order and related filings in the trust administration record to document the legal basis for actions taken and to guard against future claims or misunderstandings about asset ownership.
A Heggstad petition is a legal request to the probate court asking it to recognize that specific property should be treated as trust property even though it was not formally retitled into the trust before the settlor’s death. It is used when assets were intended to be held by a trust and evidence of that intent exists, but transfer formalities were not completed. The petition relies on documentary and circumstantial evidence to demonstrate the settlor’s plan and seeks an order to align title with the trust for administration purposes. This remedy helps avoid a separate probate administration for the identified assets and provides trustees with legal authority to manage and distribute the property according to the trust. It is particularly helpful when institutions will not process transfers without a court order or when clarity and finality are needed to protect beneficiary interests and preserve estate value.
The time to resolve a Heggstad petition varies depending on the complexity of the facts, whether interested parties object, and the local court calendar. If the facts are straightforward and no objections are filed, courts can sometimes issue an order after reviewing the petition and supporting declarations within a matter of weeks to a few months. Complex or contested matters may take longer, particularly if hearings are required or additional evidence must be developed. Early outreach to institutions and thorough preparation of the petition can shorten the timeline by addressing institutional concerns and limiting contested issues. Promptly providing requested documentation and coordinating with interested parties also helps expedite court review and final resolution.
Supporting evidence commonly includes the trust instrument and any amendments, beneficiary designation forms, account statements, deeds, correspondence indicating the settlor’s intent, and declarations from trustees, beneficiaries, or professionals who can attest to transfer attempts or the settlor’s statements. A certification of trust and the settlor’s death certificate are typically included as well to satisfy institutional requirements and the court’s evidentiary needs. The strength of a petition often depends on the totality of the evidence rather than a single document. Consistent and contemporaneous records showing the settlor’s intent to include the asset in the trust are persuasive. Declarations that recount actions taken or directions given by the settlor can also be influential when they corroborate written documents.
In some cases, banks, brokerage firms, and title companies will accept a certification of trust, a death certificate, and required institutional forms to transfer assets to a trustee without a court order. Early communication to identify each institution’s policies and specific documentation requirements can often resolve matters administratively. When institutions are cooperative and the documentation is clearly aligned with the trust, filing a petition may not be necessary. However, if an institution refuses to proceed without a court order, that refusal becomes part of the factual basis for seeking a Heggstad petition. Documenting institutional refusals and pursuing a petition provides a path to obtain a court order that institutions will accept to complete transfers and resolve title matters.
Filing a Heggstad petition does not inherently open a full probate estate for all assets. The petition is a targeted proceeding seeking a court order to recognize specified assets as trust property. When granted, it avoids probate for those assets by authorizing trustees to manage them under the trust. The petition is limited to the identified property and does not require full probate administration unless broader estate issues are also present. If other assets require probate or if disputes arise that touch on broader estate issues, additional filings or proceedings may be necessary. The petition itself, however, is intended to provide a remedy specific to assets that should be in the trust but were not retitled during life.
Interested parties who may need to be notified typically include beneficiaries named in the trust, any persons with a potential financial interest in the asset, and parties required by probate rules such as the decedent’s heirs or creditors in some circumstances. Proper service ensures that affected parties have notice and an opportunity to respond, and it preserves procedural fairness in the court’s consideration of the petition. The specific notice requirements depend on local probate rules and the nature of the asset. We ensure that service and notice comply with statutory and local requirements so that the petition proceeds without procedural defects that could delay the court’s consideration or lead to challenges later in the administration process.
Costs associated with filing a Heggstad petition include court filing fees, potential service costs, and reasonable legal fees for preparing the petition, declarations, and exhibits. Fees vary based on the complexity of the case and the amount of work required to gather evidence and respond to potential objections. When an administrative approach is possible, costs may be lower because fewer court filings and hearings are necessary. We focus on cost-efficient strategies, attempting institution-level resolution when practical and recommending a petition only when it is the most effective means to secure clear title and protect estate value. We discuss anticipated costs and fees early so clients understand likely expenses and can make informed decisions about how to proceed.
If someone objects to the petition, the court will consider the objections and may schedule a hearing to evaluate competing evidence. Objections can raise factual disputes about the settlor’s intent, competing claims to the asset, or procedural issues. The court will weigh declarations, documents, and witness statements to determine whether the petitioner has shown that the asset should be treated as trust property. When objections arise we prepare responsive declarations and legal arguments to address concerns and present a complete factual record. In some cases, objections are resolved by negotiation or clarification of the evidence; in others a hearing resolves the dispute with a court order that clarifies ownership and administration rights.
A Heggstad petition can sometimes be used for certain retirement accounts or life insurance when the account owner intended the asset to be governed by the trust and when documentary evidence supports that intent. However, many retirement and insurance accounts have beneficiary designations that control disposition outside of a trust, and those forms typically govern unless changed. The role of beneficiary designations and plan rules must be carefully reviewed to determine whether a petition is appropriate or whether other administrative steps are required. When beneficiary forms are inconsistent with the trust or when plan rules limit transfer without a court order, a petition may be part of the solution to reconcile conflicting documentation or to seek court recognition of trust ownership. Each situation requires careful analysis of the account agreements, beneficiary designations, and trust provisions.
To begin the process in Aptos Hills-Larkin Valley, gather the trust documents, death certificate, deeds, account statements, beneficiary forms, and any correspondence or records showing the settlor’s intent. Contact our office at 408-528-2827 to arrange a review and discussion of the documentation. We will evaluate whether an administrative resolution is possible or whether a Heggstad petition should be prepared and filed. We guide clients through document collection, institutional outreach, and petition preparation if needed, keeping communication clear and focused on resolving title and transfer issues quickly and cost-effectively. Early review helps identify the most efficient path forward and provides trustees with a practical plan to secure property for trust administration.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas