A trust modification petition allows a person to request court approval to change the terms of an existing trust when circumstances have changed since the trust was created. In Aptos Hills-Larkin Valley and throughout Santa Cruz County, residents turn to the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman for careful guidance through this legal process. We help clients identify whether proposed changes are consistent with the settlor’s intent and applicable California probate rules. Our approach emphasizes clear communication, careful preparation of petitions, and steady support during hearings so that clients understand options and potential outcomes before pursuing modification through the court.
Many people assume trusts are fixed documents, but California law permits court-supervised modifications in a range of situations. Reasons for modification may include changed family dynamics, trustee removal or replacement, tax planning adjustments, or correction of drafting errors. When a trust cannot be modified by agreement among beneficiaries or when capacity issues are at play, a trust modification petition becomes necessary. We assist with fact-gathering, drafting the petition, serving interested parties, and representing clients in negotiations or hearings. Our goal is to secure a practical, lawful outcome while minimizing stress for families and trustees.
Seeking a trust modification can preserve the settlor’s intent while adapting to present realities, such as remarriage, beneficiary changes, or evolving financial circumstances. When handled properly, modification protects beneficiaries’ interests, fixes drafting mistakes, and ensures trust administration remains workable and legally compliant. A court-approved modification creates a clear, enforceable record of the changes and reduces the risk of future disputes among beneficiaries or between trustees and beneficiaries. Clients benefit from improved estate administration, reduced uncertainty, and peace of mind knowing changes are implemented under California probate rules and court oversight when needed.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman assists clients across Santa Cruz County and nearby areas with trust-related matters, including trust modification petitions and related estate planning documents like revocable living trusts, pour-over wills, and Heggstad petitions. Our approach is client-focused and practical: we listen to your goals, evaluate legal options under California law, and provide clear guidance on petition strategy, evidence collection, and negotiating with affected parties. We prepare thorough filings and represent clients in court where needed, aiming to achieve solutions that align with the settlor’s wishes and protect beneficiaries’ rights.
A trust modification petition is a formal request to the probate court to change a trust’s terms when certain legal standards are met. Common grounds include proving the settlor’s changed intent, correcting errors, accommodating changed tax laws, or addressing trustee misconduct or incapacity. The petition process requires careful documentation of facts, clear legal argumentation, and proper notice to all interested parties so they have an opportunity to object. Courts evaluate whether the proposed modification serves the trust’s purpose and complies with statutory rules. Proper preparation improves the likelihood of a favorable and enforceable modification.
Not all trust changes require court petitions; some modifications can be handled through trust amendment clauses, beneficiary consents, or decanting where legally permitted. However, court petitions are often necessary when beneficiaries disagree, the settlor’s capacity is contested, or when changes require judicial approval under California Probate Code. The petition timeline may vary depending on case complexity, notice periods, and any objections. Parties should be prepared to provide evidence, testimony, and legal argument to support requested changes. Legal representation helps ensure procedures are followed and positions are presented persuasively to the court.
A trust modification petition asks a court to authorize changes to an existing trust document when certain legal conditions justify modification. Situations include ambiguous language needing clarification, changes in beneficiary circumstances, discovery of drafting errors, or events that frustrate the original purpose of the trust. The court’s role is to confirm that the proposed changes are consistent with the settlor’s intent and legal standards. Because trust modification can affect property distribution and fiduciary duties, the petition process requires precise factual and legal support to gain court approval and provide a stable basis for future administration.
Preparing a trust modification petition involves several important steps: gathering relevant trust documents and communications, documenting reasons for the change, preparing declarations and legal briefs explaining the grounds for modification, and identifying all interested parties who must be notified. The petition must include a proposed order and a clear statement of the relief sought. Once filed, parties receive notice and may negotiate or file objections. If disagreements persist, a hearing will resolve the matter. Thorough preparation and careful notice procedures help reduce delay and increase the petition’s chances of success.
Understanding common legal terms helps interested parties navigate a trust modification petition. Definitions clarify roles, procedures, and legal standards used by courts when evaluating petitions. Familiarity with terms such as settlor, trustee, beneficiary, Heggstad petition, and pour-over will helps clients follow the process and communicate effectively with legal counsel. Clear definitions reduce confusion about responsibilities, deadlines, and the impact of proposed changes. Reviewing these terms before filing improves decision-making and prepares parties for possible negotiation and court proceedings.
Settlor refers to the person who originally created the trust and whose intentions generally guide trust interpretation and modifications. The settlor’s expressed wishes, documented in the trust instrument and related papers, are central to evaluating proposed changes. Courts will look for evidence of the settlor’s intent, contemporaneous communications, and any capacity or undue influence concerns when considering petitions. When the settlor is alive and competent, courts give strong weight to their directions. If the settlor is deceased or lacks capacity, petitions must rely on documentary evidence and legal standards to show that the requested change reflects the settlor’s intent or remedies an error.
A petition to modify a trust is a formal court filing that requests judicial approval to change the trust’s terms for reasons such as correcting mistakes, accommodating changed circumstances, or addressing issues that prevent effective administration. The petition must explain the legal and factual basis for the requested modification and demonstrate that the change serves the trust’s purpose. Courts require proper notice to all interested parties and may hold hearings to adjudicate disputes. A successful petition results in a court order that legally modifies the trust and provides clarity for trustees and beneficiaries moving forward.
The trustee is the individual or entity responsible for managing trust assets in accordance with the trust instrument and applicable law. Trustees owe fiduciary duties to beneficiaries, including duties of loyalty, prudence, and impartiality. If trustee actions interfere with the trust’s purpose or if a trustee is unable or unwilling to serve, a petition may seek to replace or remove the trustee as part of a modification. Courts will evaluate trustee conduct and determine whether changes to trustee powers or appointment are appropriate to protect beneficiaries and ensure proper administration.
A Heggstad petition is a type of court filing used to determine whether property should be treated as part of a trust when assets were intended to be transferred to the trust but were not properly retitled. This petition helps clarify whether assets should be administered under the trust terms. While not a modification per se, a Heggstad petition often accompanies trust-related litigation or administrative actions when there is uncertainty about title or funding. Clear documentation of intent and supporting evidence are necessary to convince a court to include such property within the trust’s scope.
When contemplating changes to a trust, clients can consider several approaches: executing a formal amendment if the settlor is available and capacity is clear, securing written waivers or consents from beneficiaries where permitted, decanting or administrative transfer under statutory authority, or seeking a court-ordered modification via petition. Informal routes are often faster and less costly but require consent and clear authority. A court petition is necessary when disagreements exist, capacity is uncertain, or statutory conditions for nonjudicial changes are not met. We analyze each option and recommend the path that best protects beneficiaries’ interests and aligns with legal requirements.
A limited approach, such as a simple amendment to the trust, is suitable when the settlor is alive, competent, and willing to make the requested changes directly. In those circumstances, the settlor can execute an amendment or restatement that clearly adjusts terms without involving the court. This route is often faster, less expensive, and less public than a petition. It is important to follow the trust’s amendment requirements and proper formalities so the changes are valid and enforceable. Careful drafting helps avoid future disputes among beneficiaries and ensures the document reflects current intentions.
A nonjudicial resolution may work when all beneficiaries whose interests would be affected sign a written waiver or agreement consenting to the proposed modification and the law permits such consent. When beneficiaries are in full agreement and the trust instrument allows for amendments without court involvement, parties can implement changes more quietly and economically. However, written consents should be properly executed and documented to prevent later disputes. Even with unanimous consent, legal counsel can ensure the agreement complies with California law and that changes are implemented in a manner that protects all parties.
Comprehensive legal service and a petition become necessary if beneficiaries dispute the proposed changes or if there are questions about the settlor’s capacity or possible undue influence. In such cases, the court must evaluate evidence and make binding determinations on the trust’s modification. Court proceedings help create an authoritative record and resolve disagreements that cannot be settled informally. Preparing a strong petition, compiling supporting declarations and documents, and presenting persuasive arguments at a hearing are all essential steps toward securing a resolution that reflects the trust’s purpose and protects the interests of beneficiaries.
When proposed changes could have major tax implications, affect retirement accounts, or alter distributions of valuable assets, professional legal assistance ensures the modification is structured to avoid unintended consequences. A court-approved modification provides a clear legal framework for trustees to follow and can safeguard tax treatment and creditor protections when done correctly. Legal guidance helps identify indirect effects of changes, coordinate necessary related documents like certification of trust or retirement plan trust provisions, and secure court approval when required to protect all parties involved.
A comprehensive approach to trust modification combines careful legal analysis, precise drafting, and attentive court representation when needed. This approach reduces the likelihood of procedural missteps, increases the clarity of proposed changes, and limits future disputes. By handling notices, declarations, and evidentiary support thoroughly, a well-prepared petition stands a better chance before the court and provides a durable, enforceable order. Clients who choose a comprehensive path often achieve smoother trust administration and better protection for beneficiaries over the long term.
Comprehensive representation also helps coordinate related estate planning documents, such as updating pour-over wills, powers of attorney, advance health care directives, and certifications of trust. Ensuring consistency across documents prevents conflicting instructions and makes trustee duties clearer. This holistic review identifies gaps in the estate plan and addresses them alongside the modification request, offering an integrated result. The outcome is a cohesive set of estate planning instruments that support effective administration and reflect current family and financial circumstances.
A carefully drafted, court-approved modification reduces ambiguity and creates a public record that clarifies the trust’s terms for trustees and beneficiaries. When changes are handled comprehensively, there is less room for later disagreements or competing interpretations of the trust instrument. Courts appreciate clear evidence of intent and proper notice, which can prevent subsequent challenges. By addressing potential points of contention up front and securing judicial validation when necessary, families can reduce the likelihood of prolonged conflict and legal costs down the road.
Comprehensive modifications provide trustees with precise instructions and authority to manage trust assets according to updated terms, which smooths administration and reduces fiduciary uncertainty. Clear court orders and updated trust documents make it easier for trustees to act with confidence and for beneficiaries to understand distribution mechanics. When trustee responsibilities and powers are aligned with current circumstances, recordkeeping, tax compliance, and beneficiary communications are more straightforward, resulting in more efficient trust administration and less friction among parties.
Collecting trust documents, prior amendments, correspondence with the trustee or beneficiaries, financial statements, and any records that reflect the settlor’s intent is essential before filing a petition. Clear documentation simplifies drafting declarations and demonstrates the foundation for requested changes. These materials help identify possible objections and allow counsel to address evidentiary needs proactively. Early document gathering shortens case preparation time, enables focused discovery if necessary, and provides a stronger factual record for presentation to the court in support of the modification.
When a trust is modified, other estate planning instruments may need updates to reflect the new structure and ensure consistency. Documents such as pour-over wills, powers of attorney, advance health care directives, and retirement plan provisions can have interdependent effects on estate administration. Reviewing and updating related documents alongside a petition reduces the chance of future conflicts and ensures that the settlor’s broader estate plan remains coherent. Proper coordination helps trustees and family members carry out the settlor’s wishes with minimal confusion.
People pursue trust modification petitions for many reasons, including correcting drafting errors, adapting to changed family circumstances such as divorce or birth, resolving ambiguities that hinder administration, replacing or removing a trustee, or addressing property that was intended to be in the trust but was never properly transferred. A court-ordered modification can clarify distribution schemes and trustees’ powers. When nonjudicial options are unavailable or when parties cannot agree, a petition provides a legally enforceable path to adjust the trust in a way that reflects present realities while respecting the settlor’s overall plan.
Another common reason to seek modification is to address tax planning or retirement account issues that were not anticipated when the trust was created. Changes in law, family wealth, or the settlor’s goals can make original provisions impractical or counterproductive. Petitioning the court can align trust terms with current tax considerations and asset structures. When property titles, beneficiary designations, or trustee authorities conflict with the trust’s purpose, a court decision can provide a definitive resolution that facilitates efficient administration and protects beneficiaries’ interests going forward.
Frequent circumstances that result in petition filings include disputes over beneficiary entitlements, errors in drafting that contradict the settlor’s documented intent, trustee incapacity or misconduct, changes in tax law or financial circumstances, and discovery that trust assets were not properly funded. Life events like remarriage, divorce, or the birth of new family members may also require adjustments to distributions. When these issues cannot be resolved informally, a petition to the probate court provides a structured forum to obtain enforceable modifications that reflect current needs and legal standards.
Drafting mistakes or ambiguous language in a trust can result in confusion over distributions, trustee powers, or beneficiary rights. A petition can request specific clarifications or corrections so the trust operates as intended. Courts evaluate extrinsic evidence, such as drafts and communications, to determine the settlor’s intent. Fixing these issues through a judicial order avoids future disputes and gives trustees explicit directions. Correcting errors protects beneficiaries and helps ensure consistent administration in line with what the settlor wanted when the trust was created.
When a trustee is unable or unwilling to fulfill duties, or when beneficiaries question the trustee’s conduct, a petition may seek removal or replacement and adjust trustee powers accordingly. Judicial intervention ensures an orderly transition and clarifies successor trustee authority. Courts consider the best interests of beneficiaries and available alternatives for administration. A court-ordered appointment or modification protects trust assets and provides a legally sanctioned path for bringing in a qualified trustee to carry out the trust’s terms while minimizing administrative interruption.
Life events such as divorce, remarriage, births, deaths, or significant shifts in financial circumstances can make original trust provisions impractical or unfair. When such changes affect how assets should be managed or distributed, a petition allows the court to authorize necessary adjustments. This ensures beneficiaries receive intended protections and that trustee obligations align with current realities. Courts will balance the settlor’s original purposes with present conditions, crafting modifications that preserve the trust’s purpose while adapting to new circumstances.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman serves clients in Aptos Hills-Larkin Valley and the surrounding Santa Cruz County communities with personal and pragmatic legal support for trust modifications and related estate planning matters. We help individuals and families assess whether a petition is required, gather evidentiary support, draft clear petitions and proposed orders, and represent interests in negotiations or at hearings. Our office emphasizes attentive client communication and steady guidance through every stage of the process, providing the information needed to make informed decisions about trust changes.
Clients work with the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman because we provide focused, accessible legal support tailored to trust modification matters and broader estate planning needs. We prioritize understanding each family’s unique circumstances and explaining options clearly under California law. Our role is to evaluate whether a nonjudicial approach is possible, or whether a court petition is the best path, and then prepare the necessary documentation and representation. Our goal is to secure a stable, legally sound result that reflects the settlor’s intentions and protects beneficiary rights.
We routinely coordinate trust modifications with updates to related estate planning documents to ensure consistency across wills, powers of attorney, advance health care directives, and trust certifications. This integrated approach reduces future conflicts and clarifies the full estate plan so trustees have practical instructions. Attention to procedural detail and effective communication with beneficiaries and trustees aims to reduce delay and help parties reach resolutions when possible without prolonged litigation. Where court involvement is required, we prepare thorough filings and representation to pursue a satisfactory outcome.
From initial assessment through court filing and implementation, our office helps clients navigate the technical steps that make a modification enforceable and clear. We assist with evidence collection, drafting proposed orders, serving interested parties, and advising on settlement options. Our commitment is to provide straightforward guidance about potential risks and benefits, so clients can make choices consistent with their goals. Whether the matter is a straightforward amendment or a contested petition, we work to achieve the most effective resolution under applicable California law and probate rules.
Our process begins with a thorough intake to learn about the trust, the settlor’s intentions, and the circumstances prompting the requested change. We review trust documents, related estate planning instruments, and any communications that reveal intent. Next, we recommend whether an amendment, beneficiary consent, or court petition is most appropriate. If a petition is needed, we prepare the paperwork, serve required notices, and negotiate where possible. If the matter proceeds to hearing, we present evidence and legal argument to seek a clear, enforceable court order. Throughout, we keep clients informed about timing and next steps.
The first step is a careful review of the trust instrument and all related documents, including past amendments, wills, powers of attorney, and asset records. We gather communications that help establish the settlor’s intent and identify any ambiguities or mistakes. This phase determines whether a nonjudicial amendment is possible or whether a petition will be necessary. We also identify interested parties who must be notified and collect supporting declarations. A thorough document review provides the foundation for drafting a persuasive petition and anticipating potential objections.
Collecting all relevant trust documents, account statements, deeds, and communications is essential to support any proposed modification. Evidence of the settlor’s intent, such as draft versions of the trust, letters, or emails, can be critical. Proper documentation helps clarify ambiguous language and supports arguments for correction or modification. This part of the process also includes identifying and locating beneficiaries and trustees who will need notice. A complete and organized file streamlines drafting and reduces surprises during the petition process or settlement discussions.
After assembling the record, we evaluate whether amendments, beneficiary consents, decanting, or a court petition best serves the client’s objectives. We explain procedural requirements, potential obstacles, and anticipated timelines so clients can make informed decisions. Strategy considerations include the likelihood of objections, evidentiary needs to demonstrate intent or correct errors, and the advisability of negotiating before filing. A clear strategy helps define the scope of any requested changes and frames the petition in a manner aligned with California probate law.
If a petition is the recommended path, we draft a detailed petition that explains the requested modification, sets out the factual basis, and proposes a specific court order. Documents include declarations, exhibits, and a proposed judgment or order reflecting the requested changes. Proper service of notice on all interested parties is arranged in accordance with statutory requirements. Once filed, the court calendar and response deadlines are monitored, and we engage in settlement discussions or preparations for hearing as appropriate to advance the client’s position efficiently.
We prepare declarations from the settlor, trustees, or other witnesses that describe the basis for modification and attach relevant exhibits such as drafts or correspondence that show intent or necessity. These sworn statements are essential for explaining the factual background to the court and rebutting anticipated objections. Exhibits must be clearly organized and authenticated to support legal arguments. Well-prepared declarations increase the petition’s persuasiveness and reduce the need for extensive discovery or evidentiary disputes at hearings.
After the petition and supporting materials are complete, we file the documents with the appropriate probate court and ensure that all interested parties receive timely legal notice. Service requirements vary depending on the parties’ locations and relationships to the trust, and strict compliance is necessary to protect the petition’s validity. We monitor any responses or objections and consult clients about settlement opportunities or the need to proceed to a contested hearing. Proper filing and service protect procedural rights and set the case on a clear course toward resolution.
Following filing and responses, the matter may resolve through settlement or proceed to a court hearing. When the court approves a modification, it issues an order that becomes part of the public record and directs how the trust should be administered going forward. We assist clients in implementing the court’s order, updating trust documentation, and coordinating any ancillary steps such as retitling assets, issuing a certification of trust, or revising related estate planning instruments. Implementation ensures the modification takes practical effect in trust administration.
Many petitions resolve through negotiated settlements and stipulated court orders that reflect mutual agreement among interested parties. We facilitate communications, prepare settlement documents, and draft stipulated orders for court approval. Stipulated resolutions can be faster and less costly than contested hearings and provide certainty for trustees and beneficiaries. Care is taken to ensure that any agreement is legally sound and enforceable, and that the court’s order accurately captures the modifications while protecting all parties’ rights under California law.
If objections remain, a court hearing will resolve the dispute, with presentation of declarations, exhibits, and legal argument. The judge evaluates whether the requested changes are consistent with the trust’s purpose and supported by evidence. A final order will either grant the modification as requested, grant a modified version, or deny the petition. When granted, the order guides trustees in administration and provides beneficiaries with definitive instructions. We represent clients throughout hearings to present the strongest possible factual and legal case.
A trust modification petition is often appropriate when the trust’s language is ambiguous, when there is evidence the settlor intended a different result, or when unforeseen life events have made the original terms impractical. Other grounds include trustee incapacity or misconduct, the need to correct drafting defects, or to address property that was intended to be included in the trust but was never properly transferred. Courts evaluate whether the proposed change aligns with the settlor’s overall intent and whether it serves the trust’s purpose. Because each situation is fact-specific, courts consider documentary evidence, declarations, and legal standards under the California Probate Code. When beneficiaries dispute the change or when the settlor’s capacity is an issue, judicial review ensures the modification is properly authorized and enforceable. Preparing a clear factual record and legal argument increases the petition’s likelihood of success.
Yes, beneficiaries can sometimes agree to changes without court intervention if the trust instrument and law permit nonjudicial amendments or if all beneficiaries consent to a writing that accomplishes the change. When the settlor is alive and able to amend directly, or when statutes allow decanting or trustee-directed transfers, parties can effect changes without filing a petition. These options are generally faster and avoid public court proceedings, but they require clear authority and careful documentation. When unanimous consent is not feasible or when statutory conditions for nonjudicial changes are lacking, a court petition is necessary. Legal counsel can evaluate whether nonjudicial methods are available and help prepare agreements or petitions to ensure any modifications are legally valid and enforceable under California law.
The timeline for a trust modification petition varies with case complexity, the need for evidence, the number of interested parties, and whether objections arise. Simple petitions with cooperative parties can move more quickly, often within a few months, while contested matters may take significantly longer depending on court schedules, discovery needs, and litigation steps. Preparing a thorough petition and attempting negotiation early can reduce delays and shorten the overall process. Court availability and the need for hearings affect timing as well. Properly served parties have opportunities to respond or set hearings, and settlement discussions can occur at any stage. Clients should plan for multiple procedural milestones and remain engaged with counsel to address questions and streamline progress toward resolution.
If beneficiaries object to a proposed modification, the court will consider the objections and evaluate whether the petition’s grounds and evidence justify the requested change. Objecting parties may present contrary declarations and legal arguments. The court weighs the evidence to determine whether the proposed modification aligns with the settlor’s intent and serves the trust’s purpose. An objection can lead to settlement talks or a contested hearing where the judge issues a binding decision. Objections do not automatically block modification, but they can prolong the process and increase costs. Early engagement, transparent communication, and strong documentation of intent can reduce the likelihood or impact of objections, and counsel can explore settlement options that resolve disputes without a protracted hearing.
Courts will correct drafting errors when there is convincing evidence that a mistake was made and the proposed correction reflects the settlor’s intent. The proof required depends on the nature of the error and the available evidence, such as drafts, correspondence, or witnesses. A well-supported petition demonstrates that the correction is consistent with the settlor’s overall plan and necessary to carry out their intentions. However, not every requested correction will be granted. The court’s decision depends on the strength of the evidentiary record and applicable legal standards. Proper preparation of declarations and exhibits increases the likelihood that the court will accept corrections that restore the settlor’s intent and prevent unintended consequences for beneficiaries.
A Heggstad petition addresses whether certain property should be treated as trust property when it was intended to be transferred to the trust but remained in the settlor’s name. It focuses on title, funding, and whether the asset should be administered under the trust. By contrast, a trust modification petition seeks to change the terms of the trust itself rather than to determine whether a particular asset belongs to the trust. Both petitions may arise together, for example when an asset not properly retitled prompts a request to include it under trust administration and to adjust trust terms accordingly. Proper evidence of intent and documentation are important in both types of proceedings to obtain favorable court rulings.
When a court approves a modification, trustees generally must follow the terms of the court order and implement the changes in trust administration. The court order provides legal authority for trustees to act under the modified terms and reduces uncertainty about distribution and management. Trustees should review the order, update trust records, and take necessary actions such as retitling assets or issuing certifications of trust as directed. If a trustee disagrees with the order or cannot comply for other reasons, further court supervision or clarification may be required. Communicating promptly with beneficiaries and seeking legal guidance helps trustees carry out the order effectively and avoid disputes or liability for noncompliance.
Yes, there are nonjudicial alternatives including amendments executed by the settlor, beneficiary consents and waivers, and statutory decanting or trust-directed transfers where available. These options depend on the trust’s terms and California statutes, and they can offer quicker, private, and less costly means of changing a trust when parties agree or the settlor has capacity to act directly. Nonjudicial methods are not always available, particularly when beneficiaries disagree or when capacity is contested. Legal counsel can evaluate whether a nonjudicial path is viable, draft the necessary documents, and advise on the risks and benefits relative to pursuing a court petition.
Tax implications can be an important consideration when changing trust terms, especially for irrevocable trusts, retirement plans, or large estates. Certain modifications may affect estate, gift, or income tax treatment, and changes should be structured to avoid unintended tax consequences. Working with legal counsel and tax professionals helps ensure modifications preserve desired tax characteristics and comply with applicable rules. When tax-sensitive assets are involved, a petition may need to coordinate with estate or tax planning strategies to protect beneficiaries and maintain favorable treatment. Thoughtful planning and careful drafting reduce the risk of negative tax outcomes and support a sustainable administration plan for the trust.
Before filing a trust modification petition, gather the trust instrument and any amendments, relevant correspondence, asset records, and documents that show the settlor’s intent or explain the problem you wish to correct. Identify all interested parties and any potential objections so that counsel can evaluate strategy. Early document collection and preliminary discussions about goals allow counsel to recommend the most efficient path forward, whether nonjudicial or judicial. It is also helpful to consider related estate planning documents that may need updating, such as powers of attorney, advance health care directives, or pour-over wills. Consulting with counsel early helps avoid procedural missteps and ensures that any petition filed has a strong evidentiary foundation tailored to the specific facts.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas