A Heggstad petition is a legal procedure used in California to correct situations where real property intended to be held in a trust was never properly transferred into the trust. For Corralitos residents, a Heggstad petition can be the most practical path to confirm that property belongs to a trust despite the title remaining in the decedent’s individual name. Our approach begins with a careful review of trust documents and property records, followed by preparation of clear, court-ready pleadings. We emphasize thorough communication with family members and trustees to avoid surprises and aim to resolve matters efficiently while safeguarding the trust’s intended distributions.
Many families discover after a trustmaker’s death that real property was omitted from the trust due to oversight, outdated deeds, or clerical errors. A Heggstad petition asks the court to declare that the property should have been held in the trust and to order appropriate transfer or entry on public records. This process reduces friction for beneficiaries and allows the trustee to manage assets according to the trust terms. We focus on explaining the steps clearly, helping gather necessary records, and preparing documentation that supports the petition so that the court can resolve title issues and honor the trustmaker’s intentions.
A Heggstad petition provides a legal remedy to ensure property is treated as trust property even if the title was never changed. The principal benefits include avoiding a prolonged probate process for that asset, clarifying ownership for banks and title companies, and enabling the trustee to administer the estate in line with the trustmaker’s wishes. Filing a petition can also prevent future disputes among heirs by producing a court order that confirms the trust’s claim. For families in Corralitos and Santa Cruz County, resolving title issues through this procedure helps preserve estate value and reduces administrative friction during an already difficult time.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provides estate planning and trust administration services tailored to California residents, including Heggstad petitions when properties were not properly transferred into trust. Our practice emphasizes careful document review, practical explanation of court procedures, and steady guidance through filings and hearings. We assist trustees and family members in collecting deeds, trust paperwork, and supporting affidavits, then prepare persuasive petitions for the superior court. The goal is to obtain a clear judicial determination that allows the trustee to proceed with trust administration and protect the decedent’s intended arrangements for beneficiaries.
A Heggstad petition asks the court to recognize that real property should be treated as part of a trust despite recorded title showing an individual owner. The petition typically explains the trustmaker’s intent, points to the trust document, and provides documentary evidence such as deeds, trust certification, and correspondence that show the asset was meant to be included. The court examines the totality of the records and may hold a hearing. If the court grants the petition, it issues an order that clarifies ownership and may direct the county recorder to reflect the trust as the owner or allow the trustee to take the necessary steps to transfer title.
The process begins with a comprehensive review to determine whether the property was omitted by mistake or technical oversight. A Heggstad petition often requires supporting declarations from the trustee or interested persons and copies of relevant documents. The court’s ruling provides legal certainty so trustees can manage and distribute the property under trust terms. This remedy is commonly used when a trustmaker executed a trust but retained assets in their own name or when a deed was not properly recorded. Thoughtful preparation of the petition increases the likelihood of a favorable outcome and smooth post-judgment recording.
A Heggstad petition arises from California case law and statutory practice to confirm that property not formally transferred into a trust should nonetheless be treated as trust property. It applies when the trustmaker clearly intended the asset to belong to the trust but the deed or title remained in the decedent’s name due to oversight or mistake. The petition provides the court with the authority to declare that ownership belongs to the trust, enabling trustees to act without opening probate for that asset. The petition’s success depends on clear evidence of intent, consistent trust documentation, and persuasive legal presentation to the court.
Filing a Heggstad petition requires assembling documentary evidence demonstrating the trustmaker’s intent, preparing declarations to explain the context, and drafting a petition that lays out the legal basis for relief. Essential elements include the trust document or certification of trust, deeds or title records, affidavits from trustees or witnesses, and a clear chronology of why the property remained outside the trust. The petition must be filed with the appropriate superior court and served on interested parties. After a hearing, a court order clarifies ownership and may permit recording documents to reflect the trust as owner of the property.
Understanding the vocabulary linked to trust-related petitions helps trustees and family members follow the process and make informed decisions. Common terms include trust, trustee, beneficiary, deed, probate, and title. A clear grasp of these terms makes it easier to gather the right records, prepare accurate affidavits, and communicate with the court, title companies, and other interested parties. This glossary section explains each term in plain language so that those involved can recognize the documents and steps needed to support a petition and proceed with trust administration without unnecessary delay.
A trust is a legal arrangement in which a trustmaker transfers property into a trust document to be managed and distributed by a trustee for the benefit of named beneficiaries. A trust defines how assets are to be used during the trustmaker’s life and distributed after death. Trusts can reduce the need for probate, provide privacy, and set specific terms for distributions. In Heggstad petition matters, the trust document and any certification of trust are key pieces of evidence showing that the trustmaker intended specific property to be governed by the trust.
A trustee is the individual or entity appointed to manage trust assets according to the terms of the trust document. The trustee collects and safeguards assets, pays debts and taxes when appropriate, and distributes property to beneficiaries as directed. In a Heggstad petition, the trustee often files declarations and supports the petition with documentation showing the trustmaker’s intent. The trustee’s role includes coordinating with title companies and county recorders to ensure that any court orders are followed and that property records accurately reflect the trust’s ownership after resolution.
A deed is the written document used to transfer legal title to real property from one person or entity to another. Deeds must be properly executed and recorded with the county recorder to change the public record of ownership. If a deed was never executed to move property into a trust or was recorded incorrectly, that gap is often the reason a Heggstad petition is necessary. Copies of deeds, along with trust documents and any related correspondence, help the court determine whether the property should be considered trust property despite what the recorded title shows.
Probate is the court-supervised process for administering a decedent’s estate when assets are titled in the decedent’s name and not held in trust or otherwise disposed of by beneficiary designation. Probate can be time-consuming and public. When a Heggstad petition succeeds, it allows certain property to bypass a separate probate administration by confirming that the asset belongs to the trust. This reduces estate administration complexity and helps trustees fulfill the trustmaker’s wishes without subjecting that particular property to probate proceedings.
When property intended for a trust is found outside the trust, there are several possible responses, each with trade-offs. A Heggstad petition seeks a judicial determination that the property should be treated as trust property, avoiding probate for that asset. An alternative is a probate proceeding if the property must pass through the estate, which can be more time-consuming and public. In some cases, corrective deeds or ratification documents can resolve title without court involvement, but these require cooperation and clear evidence. Choosing the best approach depends on the strength of documentary evidence, the need for certainty, and the likelihood of disputes among heirs.
A limited or nonjudicial approach may work when the trust document and deeds can be updated without court intervention and all interested parties agree to the changes. If the trustee and beneficiaries are cooperative and the title company accepts an affidavit or corrected deed, it may be possible to resolve the matter through recording new documents and administrative steps. This path reduces costs and avoids a court hearing, but it requires consensus and records that convincingly show the trustmaker intended the transfer. Without cooperation or clear documentation, a Heggstad petition may be the more reliable route to achieve a binding result.
When the issue is limited to clerical mistakes, such as a misspelled name on a deed or an oversight in recording, title companies or county recorders may accept corrected documents supported by affidavits and the trust certification. In these instances, the matter can often be resolved administratively without involving the superior court. The determining factor is whether the available records and acknowledgments from interested parties provide enough assurance to third parties and recording offices to allow direct correction of the public record, thus avoiding the time and expense of formal litigation.
When ownership is contested, or there is uncertainty about whether a trustmaker intended a property to be in the trust, a comprehensive legal approach helps present the strongest factual and legal case to the court. Preparing a formal petition allows the matter to be resolved with a binding court order, reducing the risk of later challenges. This path includes collecting documentation, drafting persuasive declarations, handling proper service on interested parties, and advocating at hearings. The result can be a clear ruling that protects the trustee’s authority and the beneficiaries’ interests.
Complex title histories, competing claims, or multiple beneficiaries increase the chance that administrative solutions will not suffice. In those situations, a comprehensive process that includes court filings, notice to all interested persons, and preparation for potential objections is important. The court can weigh extensive evidence and issue directives that guide the county recorder and other institutions. Handling these complexities through the petition process reduces long-term uncertainty and clarifies the legal rights and responsibilities of trustees and beneficiaries under the trust document.
Choosing a comprehensive legal strategy offers several benefits, including a binding court order that clarifies ownership and reduces the chance of later disputes. A thorough approach includes collecting all relevant evidence, preparing supporting declarations, and ensuring that notice requirements are met, which strengthens the petition and provides confidence to title companies and trustees. The comprehensive route also helps align the resolution with the trustmaker’s intent and facilitates accurate recording of property transfers so trustees can administer assets consistent with the trust terms and beneficiaries can receive their distributions without prolonged delay.
Another advantage of a comprehensive process is predictability. The court’s involvement yields a public, enforceable ruling that guides subsequent actions such as recording deeds, settling title company concerns, and satisfying lenders. This predictability is particularly valuable when multiple parties have an interest in the property or when the recorded title could create confusion during estate administration. A well-prepared petition reduces the risk of follow-up litigation and provides a clear path for trustees to carry out trust provisions while protecting the estate’s assets and beneficiaries’ expectations.
A major benefit of pursuing a formal petition is legal finality. The court’s order resolving ownership issues creates a record that title companies and county recorders can rely upon, permitting trustees to transfer or manage property without lingering uncertainty. Clear title reduces friction when selling or refinancing and assures beneficiaries that distributions will reflect the trust’s terms. The judicial determination also limits the risk of future disputes over ownership, making estate administration more efficient and protecting the trust’s value for intended recipients.
When the court confirms trust ownership, trustees can proceed with record updates, asset transfers, and distributions with greater confidence and less need for ad hoc negotiations. That certainty streamlines estate administration by removing obstacles that otherwise slow the process or force separate probate actions. Administrative burdens for trustees and families are reduced because the court’s order serves as authoritative guidance on ownership. The result is a smoother path to honoring the trustmaker’s directions while minimizing delays that can arise from title company concerns or creditor inquiries.
Begin by assembling the trust document, any certification of trust, deeds, escrow instructions, and correspondence related to the property. Title searches and copies of recorded deeds are important for establishing the public record. Affidavits or declarations from persons familiar with the trustmaker’s intent may help corroborate the claim. Compiling these items early reduces delays and allows a legal review to identify any gaps that need to be addressed before filing. Clear, organized records make it easier to prepare a petition that persuasively demonstrates the trustmaker’s intention to include the property in the trust.
Declarations from the trustee and other knowledgeable individuals are central to a Heggstad petition. These declarations should explain how the omission occurred, detail the trustmaker’s intent, and present documentary support. Effective declarations tell a clear factual story and anticipate questions a judge or title company may raise. Drafting thorough, well-supported declarations improves the likelihood of a favorable ruling and smoother post-judgment recording. Working with counsel helps ensure the declarations are legally appropriate and complete, avoiding the need for multiple filings or supplemental evidence later in the process.
There are several common situations that lead families to pursue a H eggstad petition, including when real property is still titled in the deceased’s name despite an existing trust, when deeds were not recorded, or when transfers were intended but never completed. The petition can clarify ownership so trustees can manage or transfer the property under the trust’s terms. For Corralitos residents, resolving title questions through a petition often prevents unnecessary probate for that asset and ensures that the trustmaker’s wishes are honored without prolonged administrative delays or disputes among heirs.
Other reasons to consider this service include addressing title company or lender concerns that arise when attempting to sell or refinance property, correcting errors in recorded documents, and protecting heirs from future claims. A court order resolving ownership reduces uncertainty and provides clear authority for the trustee to take required actions. For many families, the certainty and legal recognition provided by the petition outweigh the time and cost of court involvement, especially when there are competing interests or ambiguous documentation that could otherwise complicate estate administration.
Typical situations include a properly executed trust where some deeds were never updated to show the trust as owner, property retained in the trustmaker’s name due to oversight, transfers intended during life that were never completed, or record title inconsistent with the trust documents. These circumstances generate confusion during administration and can impede sale, refinancing, or distribution. A petition addresses these issues by asking the court to declare that the property should be treated as trust property, enabling trustees to proceed with administration consistent with the trustmaker’s instructions.
When a decedent’s property remains recorded in their individual name despite a trust document specifying that the asset should be in the trust, trustees face difficulties in handling the property. Without clear title in the trust, third parties such as title companies and lenders may refuse to cooperate. A Heggstad petition provides a legal avenue to ask the court to confirm that the property is trust property, allowing the trustee to record corrective documents and proceed with administration or sale as authorized by the trust, while reducing the need for separate probate proceedings for that asset.
Occasionally, deeds are not recorded correctly or are omitted entirely, leaving property outside the public record for the trust. Clerical mistakes, missing signatures, or administrative oversights can create a mismatch between the trust documentation and recorded title. In these situations, a Heggstad petition uses the trust document and supporting records to persuade the court that the property was intended to be part of the trust, and seeks an order to correct the public record. This remedy helps trustees resolve recording issues without undertaking a full probate process for the asset.
When heirs or other claimants dispute ownership or when multiple parties have an interest in the property, administrative fixes may not be sufficient. A Heggstad petition invites the court to weigh evidence and provide an authoritative determination that reduces the risk of future challenges. The process ensures all interested parties receive notice and an opportunity to be heard, making the outcome less vulnerable to later contest. By producing a court order, the petition clarifies rights and responsibilities so the trustee can carry out the trustmaker’s directions with legal backing.
If you are dealing with property that was intended to belong to a trust but is still titled in an individual’s name, we can help evaluate your options and take the steps needed to resolve title issues. Our office assists trustees and family members with document collection, petition drafting, filing, and representation through any necessary hearings in the Santa Cruz County Superior Court. We aim to obtain a court order that clarifies ownership so the trustee can manage, sell, or distribute the property according to the trust document while minimizing delay and uncertainty for beneficiaries.
Our firm provides focused assistance with trust-related court proceedings and estate administration matters for California families. We emphasize careful review of your trust documents and property records, clear communication with beneficiaries, and preparation of comprehensive petitions and declarations. Our goal is to present a persuasive factual narrative to the court that demonstrates the trustmaker’s intent, while ensuring proper notice and procedural compliance. This methodical approach helps achieve judicial clarity so trustees can proceed with managing and distributing trust assets as intended.
We are familiar with local procedures at the Santa Cruz County Superior Court and the recording practices of the county recorder, which helps streamline the post-judgment steps such as recording orders or corrected deeds. We work to anticipate potential objections and prepare the case to address them efficiently. Our service includes guidance for trustees on next steps after a court ruling, such as updating trust property lists, coordinating with title companies, and handling any subsequent recordings to ensure the public record reflects the court’s determination.
Planning and communication are central to resolving property title issues, and we assist clients with assembling complete records and presenting the strongest available case to the court. For trustees and families, this support means less time spent navigating unfamiliar procedures and more focus on carrying out the trustmaker’s wishes. We work to secure a clear judicial resolution so trustees can fulfill their duties and beneficiaries can receive distributions with confidence, reducing future administrative burdens and uncertainty about property ownership.
Our process begins with a detailed intake to gather the trust document, deed records, and any supporting correspondence or affidavits. We then review the materials, identify gaps, and recommend the most appropriate route, whether that is a Heggstad petition, a corrective deed, or another remedy. If a petition is needed, we prepare declarations and pleadings, ensure proper service on interested parties, and represent your interests at hearings. After a favorable order, we assist with recording and post-judgment steps so the public record accurately reflects the trust’s ownership of the property.
The first step is a comprehensive review of trust documents, title records, and related evidence to determine whether the facts support a Heggstad petition. We help clients obtain copies of recorded deeds, trust certifications, and any prior communications showing intent to include the property in the trust. This review identifies missing information that must be gathered and helps assess whether a judicial petition or an administrative correction is most appropriate. Accurate and complete records at this stage set the foundation for a persuasive legal filing.
We examine the trust document, certificate of trust, recorded deeds, and any related paperwork to identify discrepancies between the trust ownership and public records. The review includes confirming the trustmaker’s directives, noting signatures and dates, and determining whether deeds were intended to convey property to the trust. This careful comparison reveals whether the omission was clerical, inadvertent, or otherwise, and informs the recommended next steps for addressing title issues through administrative means or a court petition.
Gathering declarations from trustees, witnesses, or family members who can attest to the trustmaker’s intent strengthens the petition. Supporting evidence may include correspondence, escrow records, or other documents that demonstrate the intent to transfer property into the trust. We assist with drafting declarations that clearly explain the circumstances and factual basis for the petition. Well-prepared evidence increases the petition’s credibility and improves the chances of obtaining a favorable court order that will facilitate post-judgment recording and administration.
Once documentation is assembled, we draft a petition that outlines the legal and factual grounds for treating the property as trust property, attach supporting exhibits, and prepare declarations from the trustee and other witnesses. The petition is filed in the appropriate superior court and then served on interested parties in accordance with procedural rules. Preparing the petition carefully reduces the likelihood of delays and ensures that the court has a complete record to consider when evaluating whether to grant the requested relief to confirm trust ownership and permit recording of corrective documents.
Pleadings must present a clear narrative supported by documentary evidence and legal authority explaining why the property should be treated as trust property. We craft pleadings that address potential factual challenges and supply the court with declarations and exhibits that demonstrate intent and the chain of events leading to the omission. Clarity and thoroughness in the pleadings help the court quickly understand the issues and reduce the need for supplemental filings or extended discovery, allowing the matter to proceed to hearing with a well-supported record.
Proper service on all interested parties and adherence to local court procedures are essential to avoid procedural challenges. We handle notice requirements, prepare proofs of service, and ensure filings meet the superior court’s rules. Compliance reduces the chance of objections based on procedural grounds and keeps the matter moving efficiently toward resolution. By managing these administrative details, we help trustees focus on gathering any additional needed evidence and preparing for the hearing while the petition advances through the court system.
After filing and service, the court may schedule a hearing at which interested parties can present objections or evidence. We represent trustees at hearings, present declarations and exhibits, and address any questions the judge may have. If the court grants the petition, it issues an order that clarifies ownership and directs the necessary steps to update public records. We then assist with recording the order or preparing corrective deeds and coordinating with the county recorder so that title reflects the court’s determination and the trustee can administer the property according to the trust.
At the hearing, the court reviews the petition and supporting declarations, and may allow interested parties to object or present counter-evidence. We present the factual record, emphasize the trustmaker’s documented intent, and respond to questions from the bench. Clear presentation and well-organized exhibits help the judge assess the case on the basis of the evidence. A favorable hearing typically results in an order that permits the trustee to take steps to reflect the trust’s ownership in public records or to take other actions necessary for trust administration.
After the court enters an order confirming trust ownership, the next step is to record the order or a corrective deed with the county recorder so the public record reflects the trust as owner. We assist with preparing the documents required for recording, coordinating with title companies if needed, and ensuring the county recorder accepts the instrument. Proper recording is essential to eliminate uncertainty for future transactions such as sales or refinancing and to allow trustees to manage the property in accordance with the trust terms.
A Heggstad petition is a court filing used in California to request a judicial declaration that real property should be treated as trust property even though the recorded title shows an individual owner. It is commonly used when a trustmaker intended to place property into a trust but, for various reasons, the deed or recording was not completed. The petition includes the trust document, supporting declarations, and evidence explaining the intent and circumstances of the omission, and it asks the court to issue an order clarifying ownership. This process is intended to prevent unnecessary probate and allow trustees to administer assets consistent with the trustmaker’s directions. The petition is appropriate when documentary evidence and credible declarations support the claim that the property was meant to be in the trust. The court evaluates the totality of the evidence and may schedule a hearing to consider objections or additional proof. A successful petition results in a court order that can be recorded with the county recorder, clarifying the public record and enabling trustees to manage or transfer the property under the trust’s terms. This path brings legal certainty where administrative corrections alone are insufficient.
The timeline for a Heggstad petition in Santa Cruz County varies depending on the completeness of the documentation, whether interested parties raise objections, and the court’s calendar. Gathering trust documents, deeds, and supporting declarations is the first step and can take several weeks. Once the petition is filed and served, the court typically sets a date for a hearing, which may be several weeks to a few months after filing, depending on local docket conditions and any required notice periods. If there are no objections and the record is persuasive, the court may rule more quickly, and post-judgment recording procedures can follow promptly. However, contested matters or requests for additional evidence can extend the timeline. Working proactively to assemble thorough documentation and to address potential concerns early often shortens the overall process and helps move the petition toward resolution.
Key documents for a Heggstad petition include the trust document or a certification of trust, copies of deeds and title records, and any correspondence or escrow paperwork that demonstrates the intent to include the property in the trust. Declarations from trustees, witnesses, or family members who can attest to the trustmaker’s intent and explain how the omission occurred are also important. A thorough title search and copies of recorded instruments help show the current public record and the discrepancy needing correction. Additional supporting items may include prior estate planning documents, bank or escrow statements, or emails that reveal the trustmaker’s instructions. The more complete and organized the record presented with the petition, the clearer the factual narrative will be for the court, which improves the chances of a favorable order and smooth post-judgment recording.
A Heggstad petition does not guarantee a court order in every case because the court must be convinced by the evidence that the property was intended to be part of the trust despite the recorded title. The success of the petition depends on the strength and clarity of the trust document, deeds, supporting declarations, and other evidence demonstrating the trustmaker’s intent. If the record clearly supports the claim and there are no persuasive objections, the court may grant the requested relief. However, if evidence is ambiguous or interested parties present credible contrary claims, the court may deny the petition or require additional proof. Preparing thorough documentation and anticipating potential challenges gives the petition the best chance of success and reduces the possibility of delay or denial.
Proper notice to interested parties is a key part of the petition process and rules generally require that beneficiaries and other interested persons be notified. Serving notice allows parties to object and protects the court’s ability to issue a binding order. Filing without appropriate notice risks procedural problems and could lead to a court setting aside any order entered without proper service, so it is important to follow the court’s rules on notice and service requirements. Because notice is required in most cases, trustees should be prepared to provide contact information for beneficiaries and other interested parties and to participate in any required service processes. Addressing notice requirements carefully helps ensure the petition proceeds on a sound procedural footing and that any resulting order will be enforceable and effective for recording purposes.
A pending title discrepancy can hinder efforts to sell or refinance until ownership is clarified. Title companies and lenders typically require clear title before completing transactions, and a Heggstad petition provides a path to obtain a court order that clarifies ownership and is acceptable to most title insurers. While the petition is pending, it may be difficult to close a sale or obtain financing, so parties should weigh timing factors and consult on interim options such as postponing transactions until the petition is resolved. Once the court issues an order confirming trust ownership and the order is recorded, title companies and lenders can rely on the judicial determination to clear title obstacles. This outcome enables transactions to move forward with reduced risk and establishes a public record that reflects the trust’s ownership for future dealings with lenders and buyers.
If a Heggstad petition is successful for a particular property, that asset may be treated as trust property and therefore need not be administered through a separate probate proceeding. This reduces the time and expense associated with probate for that asset and allows trustees to follow the trust terms directly. The petition thereby helps preserve estate value and streamlines administration, as the trustee can manage, transfer, or distribute the property under the trust’s provisions without opening probate specifically for that item. However, other assets not properly titled or covered by the trust may still require probate if they are solely titled in the decedent’s name. The petition’s scope generally relates to the property at issue, so resolving title through a Heggstad petition is a focused remedy that may eliminate the need for probate on that asset while leaving other estate administration matters to be handled as appropriate.
If someone objects to a Heggstad petition, the court will consider the objection and may schedule a contested hearing to evaluate the evidence from all sides. Objections can arise when parties dispute the trustmaker’s intent, challenge the sufficiency of the supporting documents, or raise questions about notice. In a contested proceeding, the court examines declarations, deeds, and any other relevant evidence to determine whether the property should be treated as trust property. Representation at the hearing helps present a clear record and address objections effectively. Resolving objections may require additional documentation, testimony, or legal argument, which can extend the timeline and may increase costs. Careful preparation and early communication with interested parties can reduce the likelihood of objections or narrow the issues in dispute, improving the chances of a streamlined resolution based on the documentary record and witness statements.
Title companies generally accept court orders that clearly adjudicate ownership and direct recording steps, which is one of the main reasons petitioners pursue a Heggstad remedy. Once the court enters an order confirming that the property belongs to the trust, the order can be recorded and title companies can rely on that public record to insure transactions. The recorded order or subsequent corrective deed provides a reliable basis for title insurance and facilitates sales or refinancing that would otherwise be impeded by ambiguous ownership. Some title companies may request additional supporting documentation or an updated title search after the order is recorded, but a clear judicial determination typically resolves most underwriting concerns. Coordinating with a title company early in the process can help identify any further steps needed to align the petition and recording with insurer requirements.
The cost of pursuing a Heggstad petition depends on factors such as the complexity of the title history, the time required to gather documentation, whether objections arise, and the court’s schedule. Expenses typically include attorney time for document review and petition drafting, court filing fees, service costs, and potential fees for title searches or certified copies. Simple, uncontested matters with clear records tend to be less expensive, while contested cases or those requiring significant additional evidence may increase fees and extend the process. Because each case is different, we provide an initial review to estimate likely steps and anticipated costs based on the facts presented. A clear and complete initial record often reduces overall costs by minimizing supplemental filings and addressing concerns proactively, while contested matters require a plan that accounts for additional time and resources needed to reach a resolution.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas