If you are considering changes to an existing trust in Day Valley, a trust modification petition can provide a legal path to update terms, beneficiaries, or administrative provisions. At the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman, we help clients evaluate whether a petition is appropriate given their family circumstances, property interests, and the original trust language. We serve clients throughout Santa Cruz County and nearby communities with clear explanations of the petition process, practical timelines, and realistic expectations about potential outcomes. Call 408-528-2827 to discuss whether a trust modification petition fits your needs and to learn the next steps tailored to your situation.
Many people choose a trust modification petition when circumstances change after a trust is created, such as remarriage, changes in health, property transfers, or shifting relationships among beneficiaries. A petition may be required when the trust cannot be modified informally through the trustee and beneficiaries, or when formal court approval is needed to reflect the settlor’s intent while protecting legal rights. Our approach focuses on practical solutions that reduce conflict and preserve assets. We provide thoughtful guidance about procedural requirements in Santa Cruz County and help clients gather documentation that supports the requested modifications in a manner that respects privacy and minimizes delay.
A trust modification petition can address changes that are necessary to reflect current realities without dismantling the overall estate plan. It allows parties to correct drafting errors, update distribution schemes, remove or add trustees or beneficiaries, and address tax or creditor concerns. When handled properly, a petition clarifies the trust’s terms, reduces ambiguity, and helps prevent future disputes. The court-approved modification provides legal certainty and a clear record of the change. Understanding whether a petition or a nonjudicial approach is more appropriate can save time and expense while safeguarding the settlor’s intentions and beneficiaries’ rights.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman has served individuals and families across Santa Cruz County and the Bay Area from our San Jose base. We handle a wide range of estate planning matters, frequently assisting clients with trust administration and trust modification petitions. Our team helps clients navigate local court procedures, gather supporting documentation, and present persuasive petitions focused on constructive resolution. We emphasize communication and practical guidance so clients understand each stage of the process, from initial assessment through court filing and final orders, always aiming to protect family relationships and preserve assets.
A trust modification petition is a formal request to the probate or superior court to change the terms of a trust when informal changes are impractical or legally insufficient. Grounds for seeking a petition include ambiguous drafting, changes in law, changed circumstances affecting beneficiaries, or situations in which trustees lack clear authority to act. The petition must explain the requested revisions and provide evidence supporting the change, such as the settlor’s intent, beneficiary consent when available, and documentation of changed circumstances. The court weighs whether the modification aligns with the settlor’s intent and protects beneficiaries’ interests before issuing an order.
The procedural path involves preparing a formal petition, serving parties who have legal standing, and presenting the matter to the court for review. Depending on local rules and the complexity of objections, the process can include hearings or an agreed order if beneficiaries consent. The petition should be supported by declarations, trust documents, and evidence demonstrating why the requested change is appropriate. Throughout the process, attention to detail in pleadings, clear communication among parties, and timely responses to court deadlines are essential to avoid unnecessary delays and to achieve an outcome that reflects the settlor’s intentions.
A trust modification petition is a court filing that asks a judge to alter one or more terms of a trust document. The petition can seek changes that are permissible under state law, such as correcting mistakes, clarifying ambiguous language, or adapting the trust to new circumstances that were unforeseen when the trust was created. The court considers whether the requested modification is consistent with the settlor’s probable intent and whether beneficiaries’ rights are respected. A successful petition results in a court order that amends the trust record and provides legal certainty moving forward.
Key elements of a trust modification petition include a clear statement of the requested modification, the legal basis for the change, a description of relevant facts and circumstances, and documentation supporting the request. The process typically begins with a thorough review of the trust instrument and related documents, followed by drafting the petition and service on interested parties. The court process may involve hearings, objections, and negotiation among parties. Proper notice and clear supporting declarations help the court assess the request efficiently, and a well-prepared petition reduces the likelihood of contested litigation.
Understanding common terms helps demystify the petition process. Terms such as settlor, trustee, beneficiary, decanting, modification, and cy pres appear frequently in petitions and court orders. Knowing what each term means and how it affects rights and duties provides clarity when reviewing documents or preparing a petition. This glossary section defines those concepts in straightforward language so clients can make informed decisions and participate confidently in discussions with counsel or the court about proposed changes to a trust.
Settlor refers to the person who originally created and funded the trust. The settlor’s intent is central to many trust modification decisions because courts seek to honor the original goals and wishes when considering whether a change is appropriate. Evidence of intent may include the original trust document, communications, and surrounding circumstances at the time of trust creation. When a settlor is alive and competent, some modifications can be made directly, but when the settlor is unavailable or deceased, the court evaluates the petition against the documented intent and legal standards governing modifications.
A trustee is the individual or entity responsible for managing the trust assets and carrying out the terms of the trust for the benefit of the beneficiaries. Trustees have fiduciary duties including loyalty and prudence, and they must act in beneficiaries’ best interests. When a modification petition is filed, the trustee’s role may include implementing agreed changes, providing accountings, or demonstrating that a proposed change is necessary to administer the trust properly. The court may also remove or replace a trustee if the petition establishes a valid reason under state law.
A beneficiary is a person or entity entitled to receive benefits from the trust under its terms. Beneficiaries may have interests that are immediate or contingent, and their legal rights can be affected by trust modifications. Courts will often require notice to beneficiaries and consider objections when deciding a petition. In many cases, obtaining beneficiaries’ consent can simplify the process and lead to an agreed order, while contested matters require the court to balance beneficiaries’ interests against the settlor’s intent and applicable law.
A modification petition is a formal request filed with the court to change one or more terms of a trust document. The petition outlines the requested changes, the reasons those changes are necessary or appropriate, and the legal basis for the court to approve them. Supporting declarations and documentation are submitted with the petition to show facts that justify the change, such as changed circumstances or drafting errors. The court reviews the petition, hears objections if any, and issues an order granting or denying the requested modification based on the law and the settlor’s intent.
When seeking to change a trust, parties may choose a petition filed in court or pursue nonjudicial alternatives such as beneficiary agreements, trustee action under discretionary powers, or trust decanting where permitted by law. A court petition provides a formal, enforceable order but may involve more time and expense. Nonjudicial avenues can be faster and less adversarial when beneficiaries agree, but they require clear authority in the trust instrument and unanimous consent in many cases. Evaluating options requires careful review of the trust, beneficiaries’ positions, and the desired outcome to determine the most effective strategy.
A limited approach is often appropriate when all beneficiaries consent to the proposed change and the trust document grants the trustee authority to carry out modifications or transfers. In such cases, a written agreement among beneficiaries or an action by the trustee under a decanting provision can implement the change without court involvement. This path can preserve privacy, reduce costs, and expedite the resolution. It is important to ensure that any nonjudicial action is supported by the trust language and documented carefully to prevent later disputes or challenges by interested parties.
Minor corrections such as clerical errors, outdated addresses, or administrative clarifications can often be handled without a court petition, provided the trustee and beneficiaries agree on the correction. Addressing these administrative issues informally helps keep the trust administration running smoothly and avoids the time and cost of a formal filing. Documentation of the agreed correction, such as signed amendments or trustee certifications, creates a record that helps prevent misunderstandings while maintaining the integrity of the trust document for future administration and potential audits or inquiries.
When beneficiaries disagree about proposed changes or when a trustee lacks authority to act unilaterally, a court petition may be the appropriate route to resolve disputes and obtain a binding order. The petition process provides a forum for evidence and legal argument, allowing the court to decide contested questions of intent, fairness, and legal authority. In these situations, comprehensive legal representation helps organize evidence, present persuasive legal reasoning to the court, and work toward an outcome that protects the rights of all parties involved while seeking a resolution that aligns with the settlor’s intent.
When a proposed modification would substantially alter beneficiary rights, change the trust’s fundamental purpose, or affect creditor or tax issues, seeking a court order ensures the change is legally sound and enforceable. Courts examine the requested modification against statutory standards and the settlor’s documented intent. A formal petition can provide the clarity and finality necessary in complex circumstances, reduce the risk of later litigation, and provide a court-supervised record of the modification that beneficiaries, trustees, and third parties can rely upon.
A comprehensive approach to a trust modification petition balances legal strategy with clear documentation and careful communication among parties. By thoroughly evaluating the trust language, relevant facts, and potential objections, the process aims to reach a durable solution that minimizes future disputes. Court approval provides a formal order that clarifies rights and obligations, and the process allows parties to address related matters such as trustee removal, asset re-titling, or tax implications. Thoughtful planning enhances the likelihood of an efficient outcome and preserves family relationships where possible.
When a petition is prepared with attention to facts and law, it helps the court understand the reason for the change and the evidence supporting it. This reduces opportunities for delay due to deficient pleadings or missing documentation. A comprehensive presentation anticipates common objections and offers legal and factual responses, streamlining the court’s review. The result is a clear judicial order that implements the intended changes and reduces ambiguity for trustees and beneficiaries managing the trust going forward, which benefits estate administration and long-term asset protection.
One major benefit of pursuing a well-prepared petition is obtaining a court order that provides legal certainty and enforceability. A judicial order clarifies how the trust should be administered under the new terms and reduces the chance of future disputes about interpretation. This certainty assists trustees in carrying out duties with confidence and helps beneficiaries understand their rights. A clear, enforceable order is particularly valuable in situations involving complex assets, blended families, or competing creditor claims where written judicial approval reduces ambiguity and supports consistent administration.
A comprehensive petition process includes measures to protect beneficiaries’ interests by ensuring proper notice, opportunities to object, and a fair presentation of facts to the court. When parties see that concerns are addressed openly and lawfully, there is often a greater chance of reaching an acceptable resolution. The transparency of court proceedings and the procedural safeguards they provide can reduce suspicion and help preserve family relationships, especially in sensitive situations involving intergenerational transfers or contested estate matters that might otherwise escalate into prolonged conflict.
Begin by gathering all relevant trust documents, amendments, beneficiary designations, financial statements, and correspondence that shed light on the original intent and current circumstances. Clear organization of these materials will strengthen a petition and speed court review. Include deeds, account statements, prior trust instruments, and any documents showing changed circumstances. Well-prepared supporting declarations that summarize evidence help the court understand the factual basis for the request. Taking time to assemble a complete record before filing reduces the likelihood of continuances and helps present your case succinctly and persuasively.
Before initiating a court petition, consider whether the trust instrument allows nonjudicial remedies such as trustee action under explicit authority or beneficiary agreements to amend terms. These alternatives can save time and cost and maintain privacy. However, they require clear authority in the trust or unanimous consent, and they may not address all legal concerns. Evaluate whether a nonjudicial approach will achieve the intended result without exposing parties to future challenges. When nonjudicial remedies are not viable, a well-crafted petition provides a reliable and enforceable solution.
Consider a trust modification petition when the trust language is ambiguous, the trust’s purpose no longer fits current circumstances, or when beneficiaries or trustees disagree about administration. Other common reasons include correcting drafting errors, addressing unexpected tax implications, resolving disputes over trustee powers, or implementing a change that cannot be accomplished without court approval. The petition route is particularly appropriate when a formal court order will provide certainty for future administration or when there are legal or practical obstacles to nonjudicial solutions that warrant judicial intervention for clarity and finality.
Another reason to pursue a petition is to protect vulnerable beneficiaries or to address changes in a beneficiary’s needs, such as long-term care or special financial circumstances. The process can also be used to remove or replace a trustee when there are legitimate concerns about fiduciary performance or conflicts of interest. By seeking a court order, parties secure a documented resolution that guides trustees and beneficiaries and reduces the risk of future litigation. This formal approach helps ensure fair treatment and a pathway to consistent trust administration over time.
Common reasons for petitions include changes in family structure such as divorce, remarriage, births, or deaths; significant changes in asset composition like business sales or property transfers; errors in the original trust language; and shifts in law that affect trust administration. Disputes over trustee decisions or beneficiary entitlements also prompt petitions. Identifying the specific circumstance driving the need for modification helps frame the petition and the desired remedy, which in turn informs the evidence and legal arguments necessary for the court to grant appropriate relief.
Life events such as marriage, divorce, the birth of a child, or the death of a beneficiary can alter the practical effect of an existing trust and may justify modification. These changes often necessitate updates to distribution terms, trustee appointments, or guardianship nominations to reflect current family dynamics. A petition that lays out the changed circumstances and proposed adjustments helps the court determine whether the modification aligns with the settlor’s underlying intent and whether it is fair to affected beneficiaries while protecting their legal rights under the trust.
Drafting errors, unclear language, or contradictory provisions in a trust can create uncertainty and administrative difficulties. A petition to modify can correct typographical mistakes, resolve ambiguous clauses, or reconcile conflicting terms to ensure the trust operates as intended. Where the document’s meaning is unclear, supporting declarations and historical context may be used to show likely intent. The court’s intervention can clarify the trust’s terms so trustees can carry out their duties without ongoing dispute or confusion among beneficiaries.
Situations involving trustee misconduct, incapacity, or disputes about fiduciary decisions may require a petition to remove or replace a trustee or to modify trustee powers to enable proper administration. Administrative challenges, such as obsolete provisions or evolved asset management needs, can also prompt modification to update trust powers or duties. The court can resolve contested issues and order changes that support effective trust management and protect beneficiaries’ interests, creating a stable framework for ongoing administration and reducing the risk of prolonged conflict.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman serves clients in Day Valley and throughout Santa Cruz County, offering practical guidance on trust modification petitions, administration matters, and related estate planning needs. We can assist with document review, drafting petitions, coordinating notice to interested parties, and presenting matters in court when required. Our goal is to provide clear, responsive help so clients understand options and likely outcomes. Contact our San Jose office at 408-528-2827 to schedule a consultation and learn how a petition might resolve your trust-related concerns efficiently and respectfully.
Our firm brings years of experience assisting clients with estate planning and trust administration matters throughout the Bay Area. We focus on tailored legal solutions that reflect each client’s circumstances and priorities, offering practical guidance on whether a nonjudicial approach or a court petition is most appropriate. We work to present petitions and supporting materials clearly and professionally to the court and opposing parties, helping clients pursue durable resolutions while minimizing unnecessary conflict and delay.
We aim to communicate plainly about expected timelines, costs, and procedural steps so clients can make informed decisions. From initial assessment through court submission and resolution, we provide hands-on assistance with document preparation, evidence gathering, and strategy. Our familiarity with local probate procedures helps streamline filings and avoid common procedural pitfalls that can slow a case. We also prioritize working cooperatively with trustees and beneficiaries when possible to reach agreements that preserve relationships and reduce litigation expense.
When a court petition is necessary, our team focuses on presenting a persuasive legal and factual record that addresses likely objections and supports the requested modification. We prepare careful declarations and clear pleadings, assist clients with document production, and represent their interests in hearings. Our goal is a fair, enforceable outcome that reflects the settlor’s intent and protects beneficiaries, achieved through thorough preparation, respectful negotiation where feasible, and diligent representation in proceedings before the court.
At the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman, we begin with an initial evaluation to determine whether a petition is necessary and the likelihood of achieving the desired outcome. We review trust documents and related records, identify interested parties, and outline the procedural steps and timelines. If a petition is appropriate, we prepare the pleadings and supporting declarations, arrange proper service, and file with the appropriate court. We work with clients to prepare for hearings and negotiate with other parties when possible to reach an efficient, binding resolution that reflects the settlor’s intent and beneficiaries’ rights.
The first step involves a careful review of the trust instrument, any amendments, related estate planning documents, and the facts prompting the requested change. We assess whether the trust contains provisions for nonjudicial remedies, whether beneficiaries consent, and whether litigation is likely. Based on this review, we recommend a strategy that balances legal effectiveness with cost and timing considerations, and we outline the documents and evidence needed to support a petition if court action is the chosen path.
During document collection, we gather deeds, account statements, prior trust versions, beneficiary records, and any communications relevant to the settlor’s intent. This factual foundation supports the petition and helps identify potential objections. Properly assembled documentation reduces the need for discovery and speeds judicial review. We also interview relevant parties to understand the context and compile declarations that present a coherent factual narrative showing why the modification is appropriate under the law and consistent with the settlor’s probable intent.
Once facts and documents are in order, we draft a petition that clearly states the requested modification, the legal basis, and supporting facts. The petition is tailored to local court rules and designed to address foreseeable objections. We prepare supporting declarations and exhibits to create a complete record. Early attention to detail in drafting helps avoid procedural issues and reduces the chance of continuances, facilitating a smoother path to resolution whether by agreement or court order.
After drafting, the petition is filed with the appropriate court and served on interested parties in accordance with statutory notice requirements. The court sets deadlines for responses, and parties may file objections. If objections arise, the matter proceeds to hearing where evidence and legal argument are presented. When parties reach agreement, the court can enter an agreed order reflecting the modification. Throughout this stage, adherence to procedural rules and timely filings is essential to preserve rights and move the matter to resolution.
Proper notice and service ensure that all interested parties are informed of the petition and have the opportunity to be heard. This typically includes beneficiaries, trustees, and any other parties with a legal interest. Failure to serve required parties can lead to delays or the need to refile, so attention to statutory notice requirements and local court procedures is vital. Documentation of service is filed with the court to establish a record that all interested parties had the opportunity to respond.
If objections are filed, the court may schedule hearings where parties present evidence and legal argument. Preparing for hearings includes organizing declarations, exhibits, and witness testimony if needed. We aim to address objections directly, proposing solutions that protect beneficiaries while preserving the settlor’s intent. The court evaluates the evidence and issues an order granting or denying the modification, or may direct alternative remedies. Thorough preparation for hearings helps ensure the court has a full understanding of the facts and legal issues.
Once the court issues an order approving a modification, the next step is implementing the changes in trust administration. This may include updating trust records, retitling assets, providing notice to financial institutions, and making revised distributions. We assist with the required documentation and filings to ensure the trust reflects the court-approved changes and that trustees and beneficiaries receive clear instructions. Follow-up includes advising on tax or administrative matters that arise from the modification to support smooth ongoing administration of the trust.
Implementing the court’s order often requires updating title documents, account registrations, and trust records to reflect the modified terms. Proper recordkeeping ensures trustees can demonstrate compliance with the court’s order and provides transparency for beneficiaries and third parties. We prepare the necessary forms and coordinate with banks, title companies, and other institutions to update accounts and deeds. Accurate implementation reduces the risk of later disputes and supports orderly trust administration in accordance with the court-approved modification.
After implementation, we monitor for any follow-up issues such as tax reporting, creditor notices, or beneficiary questions that may arise from the change. We advise trustees on ongoing fiduciary duties under the modified trust and assist beneficiaries in understanding how the changes affect distributions. Addressing post-order matters promptly helps prevent misunderstanding and ensures continued compliance with legal and administrative obligations, supporting the long-term objectives of the estate plan and the effective management of trust assets.
A trust modification petition is a formal court filing requesting changes to an existing trust. It is used when informal changes are impractical, when the trust lacks authority for the desired adjustment, or when beneficiaries disagree and court intervention is necessary to provide a binding resolution. The petition sets out the requested modifications, explains the legal reasons for the change, and provides supporting documentation so the court can evaluate whether the change is consistent with the settlor’s intent and applicable law. Filing a petition creates a public record of the requested change and gives interested parties the opportunity to object. Courts consider the settlor’s probable intent, the impact on beneficiaries, and any statutory standards for modifications. A successful petition results in a court order that amends the trust and guides future administration, offering legal certainty that informal approaches may not provide.
Yes, beneficiaries can sometimes modify a trust without court involvement when the trust instrument allows nonjudicial alternatives or when all beneficiaries provide informed consent. Options can include beneficiary agreements, trustee actions under explicit trust powers, or decanting where permitted by state law. These approaches can be faster and less costly than litigation and preserve privacy because they avoid court filings. However, nonjudicial modifications require clear authority in the trust document and unanimous agreement among interested parties in many cases. If the trustee lacks authority, beneficiaries disagree, or legal complexities are present, a petition may still be necessary to obtain an enforceable, court-approved modification that protects all parties and establishes a clear record for future administration.
Timing for a petition in Santa Cruz County varies with the complexity of the matter, the completeness of the petition, and whether objections are filed. Simple, uncontested petitions supported by clear documentation and beneficiary consent may be resolved relatively quickly, while contested matters with disputed facts or legal issues can take several months or longer. Court schedules, required notice periods, and opportunities for parties to respond influence the timeline. Early preparation and thorough documentation help reduce delays. Preparing a petition with careful attention to local procedural requirements and providing complete supporting evidence can streamline the court’s review and improve the chances of a timely resolution. Communication with other parties can also reduce the time involved when agreements are possible.
Supporting evidence typically includes the original trust document and any amendments, financial statements and deeds showing asset holdings, and declarations from parties with relevant knowledge about the settlor’s intent or changed circumstances. Documents that demonstrate drafting errors, changed conditions, or the settlor’s expressed wishes help the court evaluate the petition. Clear, organized exhibits and factual declarations present a coherent narrative for the judge to consider. Additional supporting materials may include communications that reflect the settlor’s intent, medical or financial records that show changed circumstances, and any prior agreements among beneficiaries or trustees. The precise evidence needed depends on the nature of the requested modification and the issues likely to be raised by interested parties.
A modification can have tax and creditor implications depending on the nature of the changes and the timing of the modification. For example, changes that affect income distribution, allocation of tax attributes, or ownership of assets may require additional tax reporting or affect estate or gift tax exposure. Courts and counsel will consider these potential consequences when structuring a modification and may recommend consultation with a tax professional to address specific tax concerns. Creditor claims can also be affected by a modification if changes alter asset protections or distribution timing. If there are active creditor issues, the court will consider notice and potential impacts on creditors when deciding a petition. Addressing tax and creditor implications proactively helps avoid unintended consequences and supports a stable outcome.
Yes, a petition can request removal or replacement of a trustee when there are legitimate grounds under the governing law, such as breach of fiduciary duty, incapacity, conflict of interest, or inability to perform administrative duties. The petition must present evidence supporting the need for removal and propose a qualified successor or an appropriate remedy to ensure the trust’s proper administration. Courts evaluate the trustee’s conduct in context and balance the need for continuity with the beneficiaries’ interests. If removal is granted, the court may also issue orders regarding accountings, distribution authority, or interim management to ensure the trust remains properly administered while the transition takes place.
Nonjudicial alternatives include beneficiary agreements to amend terms, trustee actions under explicit modification powers such as decanting, or informal corrections documented by trustee certifications. These approaches can be effective when beneficiaries agree and the trust instrument grants sufficient authority. Nonjudicial remedies preserve privacy, reduce costs, and can be implemented more quickly than litigation when parties cooperate. However, nonjudicial options are not appropriate when beneficiaries object, the trust lacks clear authority for the action, or when legal or tax consequences require formal court approval. When uncertainty exists about the permissibility or consequences of a nonjudicial change, seeking a court order may be the safer route to ensure enforceability and protect interested parties’ rights.
Beneficiaries and interested parties are notified according to statutory requirements and local court rules. Notice typically includes service of the petition and supporting papers so that those with legal interests have an opportunity to object or participate in proceedings. Proper service is essential to provide due process and to ensure the court can proceed with authority to issue an order that includes all affected parties. Documentation of service is filed with the court as proof that required notice occurred. In some cases, additional notice procedures are necessary for unknown or difficult-to-locate beneficiaries, and the court may require specific steps to ensure all interested parties are fairly informed before making a decision on the petition.
If beneficiaries object, the court will consider the objections as part of the hearing process. Objections can raise factual disputes about changed circumstances, question the proposed modification’s consistency with the settlor’s intent, or argue that the modification unfairly harms certain beneficiaries. The court reviews evidence from all sides and weighs legal standards to determine whether the requested change should be approved, denied, or modified. Preparing to respond to objections includes presenting clear declarations, documentary evidence, and legal argument addressing each concern. Settlement discussions can continue during the process, and courts sometimes encourage parties to resolve disputes through agreement when possible. When objections cannot be resolved, the court’s ruling provides a binding resolution to guide future administration.
Costs to pursue a trust modification petition vary depending on complexity, local court fees, the need for discovery, and whether the matter is contested. Simple, uncontested petitions that involve drafting and filing with beneficiary consent can be more affordable, while contested matters with multiple hearings, contested evidence, and extensive motion practice may be more costly. We discuss anticipated costs and strategies to manage expenses during the initial consultation so clients can make informed decisions based on budget and objectives. Where possible, parties can reduce cost by focusing on early document gathering, seeking agreement among beneficiaries, and avoiding unnecessary litigation. Even in contested matters, efficient case management, focused legal arguments, and clear documentation help control legal fees and move the matter toward resolution.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas