A Heggstad petition is a legal filing used to confirm that property belongs to a decedent’s revocable trust when the title was not formally changed before death. For residents of La Selva Beach, this process can resolve title issues without prolonged court battles, helping heirs transfer real property into the trust cleanly. The petition asks the court to declare that the decedent intended to transfer the property to the trust and that the successor trustee can convey the property according to the trust terms. Understanding the Heggstad process helps families protect property values and complete estate administration efficiently and with minimal conflict.
At Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman we assist clients in Santa Cruz County with the technical and procedural steps needed to prepare and file a Heggstad petition. Our approach emphasizes clear documentation, careful review of trust and title records, and strategic filings to reduce delay. We communicate with beneficiaries and trustees to explain options and anticipated timelines, and we coordinate with county recording offices and opposing counsel if needed. This service fits into a broader estate plan that may include trusts, pour-over wills, powers of attorney, and other trust-related documents to ensure assets pass as intended.
Filing a Heggstad petition can be essential when real estate intended to be in a trust remains titled in the decedent’s name. The petition provides legal clarity that the property was part of the trust, allowing the successor trustee to convey or manage assets as the trust directs. This avoids re-opening probate or getting a court order under different, sometimes lengthier procedures. A well-prepared petition reduces uncertainty for heirs and third parties like lenders or title companies, enabling sales, refinancing, or transfers to proceed. Resolving title issues also protects property value and helps families wrap up the estate with greater confidence.
Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman serves clients across Santa Cruz County and the surrounding Bay Area with a focus on estate planning and trust administration. Our attorneys bring years of courtroom familiarity and hands-on document preparation to each case, handling matters from revocable living trusts to Heggstad petitions and trust modifications. We prioritize practical solutions tailored to each family’s circumstances, ensuring that documents and filings reflect the client’s intentions while following California probate and trust law. Clear communication, careful record review, and steady case management are central to how we support clients through sensitive post-death proceedings.
A Heggstad petition asks the court to recognize that certain property was held by the decedent in trust despite the deed remaining in the decedent’s name. The petition typically includes evidence of the trust document, affidavits or testimony about the decedent’s intent, and supporting title records. Courts consider whether the property was meant to be governed by the trust and whether the successor trustee has authority to act. This procedure can be faster and less invasive than opening a formal probate estate. Knowing what documentation and witness statements are needed helps trustees prepare a focused and effective petition.
The practical steps include collecting the trust instrument, recording any related assignments or declarations of trust, and preparing pleadings that explain the chain of title and the decedent’s intent. The successor trustee must provide clear descriptions of the property and identify interested parties, such as beneficiaries and potential creditors. Notice requirements and local court rules shape the filing timeline. If the petition is contested, additional hearings and evidence may be required. Early coordination with title companies and county recorders can streamline the post-filing transfer once the court issues an order recognizing trust ownership.
A Heggstad petition is a judicial procedure named after a California case that addresses situations where property appears on public record in a decedent’s name but was intended to be part of a trust. The petition seeks an order confirming that the property should be treated as trust property, allowing the trustee to convey or administer it under the trust terms. It is commonly used for real estate but can apply to other assets where title discrepancies exist. The process focuses on honoring the decedent’s intent and avoiding unnecessary probate by aligning title records with the trust’s provisions.
Successful Heggstad petitions rely on clear documentary evidence and coherent factual statements. Important elements include a certified copy of the trust, the decedent’s signature page, deeds or title documents, and affidavits from trustees or witnesses attesting to intent. The petition must describe the property in detail, identify all interested parties, and explain why the property was not retitled prior to death. Filing requirements vary by county, so attachment of accurate proof of service and compliance with local rules is essential. Thorough preparation reduces the risk of delays and helps the court reach a prompt decision.
This glossary highlights terms you will encounter during a Heggstad petition: trust, successor trustee, title, deed, probate, and order confirming trust ownership. Understanding these concepts helps trustees and beneficiaries follow the process and assemble the right documents. The trust is the governing document, the successor trustee acts on behalf of the trust, and the deed is the public record that may need clarification. A court order confirming trust ownership resolves discrepancies without opening a broader probate proceeding. Familiarity with these terms streamlines communication with counsel and with county recording officials.
A trust is a legal arrangement in which a person places assets under the management of a trustee for the benefit of designated beneficiaries. In the context of a Heggstad petition, the revocable living trust is the controlling document that specifies how property should be handled during incapacity and after death. If property was intended to belong to the trust but remains titled in the decedent’s name, a petition can ask the court to confirm the trust’s ownership. Copies of the trust document and evidence of the decedent’s intent are central to proving that the asset should be administered under the trust.
The successor trustee is the individual or entity designated in the trust to manage and distribute trust assets after the original trustee’s incapacity or death. When filing a Heggstad petition, the successor trustee typically initiates the petition to clarify title and enable trust administration. The trustee must act in accordance with the trust’s terms and provide documentation that supports the claim of trust ownership. Duties include gathering records, providing notice to interested parties, and seeking court confirmation so the trustee can lawfully convey, sell, or otherwise handle the asset consistent with the trust.
A deed is the public record document that shows who holds title to real property. If the deed remains in the decedent’s name after death, a Heggstad petition can be used to demonstrate that the property was intended to be owned by the trust. The petition will explain the relationship between the deed and the trust, and may attach copies of the deed along with evidence such as the trust instrument and affidavits. Once the court recognizes trust ownership, the trustee can record the court order and any needed conveyance to align public records with the trust.
A court order confirming trust ownership is the judicial decision that acknowledges a property intended for a trust should be treated as trust property despite the deed being in the decedent’s name. This order enables the successor trustee to take actions like selling or transferring the property or recording a new deed. The order is often recorded with the county to correct the public record and to satisfy title companies or lenders. Obtaining this order is the main goal of a Heggstad petition when title discrepancies threaten to impede trust administration.
When property intended for a trust remains titled in the decedent’s name, families can pursue different legal routes. A Heggstad petition directly asks the court to recognize trust ownership without fully opening probate. Alternative approaches include a probate proceeding to transfer title or filing an affidavit under certain small estate statutes if applicable. Each option carries different timelines, costs, and notice requirements. Choosing the right path depends on factors such as property value, the clarity of trust documentation, potential creditor claims, and whether interested parties contest the claim that the property belonged to the trust.
A targeted Heggstad petition is often appropriate when the trust instrument clearly identifies the property and demonstrates the decedent’s intent that the asset be held in trust. If deeds, beneficiary designations, or trust schedules corroborate that intent, the court can often grant an order recognizing trust ownership without opening probate. This approach can be faster and less expensive than a full probate case. It requires careful assembly of documentary evidence and accurate service on interested parties so the petition proceeds smoothly and the title issue is resolved.
If beneficiaries and heirs are known and there is little likelihood of disputes, a Heggstad petition provides a focused remedy that minimizes court involvement. When parties agree or do not contest the trust claim, the process tends to move more quickly through filings and hearings. This avoids broader estate administration steps and reduces costs associated with extended discovery or litigation. Even with agreement, the petition must meet legal standards and provide sufficient proof of the decedent’s intent, so thoughtful preparation remains important to obtain a favorable order.
A comprehensive legal approach is warranted when property has a complicated title history, multiple recorded instruments, or potential competing claims. In such cases, the trustee may need more extensive investigation, including title searches, additional litigation, or coordination with lien holders. Handling these matters carefully prevents future challenges and ensures the trust’s authority is fully documented. Comprehensive representation also helps manage communication with multiple beneficiaries, address creditor concerns, and, if required, pursue alternative remedies such as a probate proceeding to clear title if a Heggstad petition alone will not suffice.
When beneficiaries contest the trust’s claim to property or when heirs assert contrary rights, a broader legal strategy is necessary to protect the trustee’s ability to act. Contested matters may require discovery, evidentiary hearings, and strategic negotiation to resolve disputes. A comprehensive approach includes preparing thorough declarations, gathering supporting witnesses or documentary proof, and evaluating settlement options to avoid protracted litigation. Addressing disputes promptly and methodically reduces the risk of costly delays and helps restore momentum to the trust administration process.
A comprehensive approach helps ensure all angles are considered when addressing title problems. That means assembling complete documentation, performing detailed title searches, communicating with interested parties, and preparing for potential disputes. This breadth of preparation increases the likelihood of obtaining a court order that will be recognized by title companies, lenders, and county recorders. The aim is to reduce the chances of future challenges and to enable the successor trustee to move forward with sales, transfers, or other trust administration tasks with confidence that the court’s order will be effective.
Comprehensive service also offers practical benefits for families under stress after a loved one’s death. By handling procedural steps, coordinating with third parties, and anticipating common hurdles, legal counsel can shorten timelines and ease the administrative burden on trustees and beneficiaries. When title complications are resolved thoroughly, families can focus on distributing assets according to the trust while preserving estate value. Thoughtful preparation and diligent handling of potential issues minimize surprises and promote an orderly transition of property according to the decedent’s wishes.
A comprehensive approach produces the documentation and court findings that title companies and lenders require, reducing the risk of later challenges to transfers or sales. A carefully prepared petition and supporting record make it more likely that county recorders will accept subsequent deeds and that third parties will rely on the court order. This clarity enables trustees to move forward with necessary transactions—such as refinancing, sale, or reconveyance—without being impeded by unresolved title discrepancies, which preserves both the value of the property and the integrity of the trust administration.
Addressing potential disputes proactively through comprehensive preparation lowers the chance of contested litigation after a transfer. Thorough evidence, clear notices to interested parties, and careful compliance with procedural rules help prevent parties from later asserting claims based on overlooked technicalities. When beneficiaries understand the process and the trustee documents a clear historical record, settlements and transfers are more likely to be final. This stability helps families avoid additional court costs and emotional strain, allowing them to focus on implementing the decedent’s estate plan.
Begin by collecting the original trust document, any amendments, deeds, and related records such as grant deeds or recorded assignments. Early collection of these materials makes it easier to establish the chain of title and demonstrate the decedent’s intent. Also assemble communication records, schedules of trust assets, and beneficiary designations. Having a complete file reduces the risk of last-minute delays and helps the trustee or counsel prepare a clear, persuasive petition. Prompt documentation gathering also assists title companies and county recorders when it is time to record the court order or new deed.
Before filing, check with title companies and county recorders about what documents they require to accept a court order or new deed. Early coordination can clarify whether additional affidavits, certifications, or recordable forms are needed to correct the public record. Knowing these requirements in advance helps avoid rework after the court issues a decision. Liaison with recording offices and title insurers can also identify potential liens or encumbrances that must be addressed, ensuring the trustee’s subsequent actions effectively resolve the title discrepancy and allow desired transactions to proceed.
Consider a Heggstad petition if a property intended to be in a revocable trust remains titled in the decedent’s name and that discrepancy is blocking the trustee from selling, refinancing, or conveying the asset. The petition can be faster and less intrusive than full probate and is appropriate when the trust document and supporting evidence clearly show the decedent’s intent. It is also useful when heirs prefer a targeted judicial determination to protect the trustee’s authority and to provide a recorded court order for clarity with title companies and future buyers.
You may also choose this service when time is of the essence, such as pending sale transactions or the need to resolve title issues for estate tax or creditor matters. Filing a Heggstad petition can remove a legal obstacle to immediate property transactions and provide a permanent record of the court’s finding. When there are known disagreements among heirs, the petition can still be pursued with additional preparation, but early legal involvement helps evaluate whether the Heggstad route or a different probate remedy better fits the circumstances.
Typical triggers include when a decedent intended to transfer real estate to a trust but failed to record a deed in the trust’s name, when county records show title in the decedent’s name only, or when an asset was omitted from trust schedules. Other scenarios involve recently acquired property that was never retitled or transfers executed with incomplete or ambiguous documentation. In such circumstances, the Heggstad petition provides a judicial mechanism to align title with the trust and enable the trustee to manage or transfer the asset according to the decedent’s plan.
A frequent occurrence is when the decedent prepared and funded a trust but did not complete the formal step of recording a deed transferring the property into the trust before passing. This oversight leaves the deed in the decedent’s name, which can confuse lenders and title companies and prevent the trustee from acting. A Heggstad petition clarifies the decedent’s intent and, if successful, allows the trustee to record the court’s order and take the necessary steps to align public records with the trust’s terms, facilitating disposition of the property.
Sometimes trust schedules that list trust assets are incomplete or ambiguous, making it unclear whether a specific parcel was included. Missing or inconsistent schedules can lead to disputes or delay transfers. A Heggstad petition backed by testimony, correspondence, and other supporting evidence can help establish that the property was intended to be trust property even if the schedule does not explicitly list it. Providing corroborating documents and witness statements strengthens the petition and helps the court to reconcile record discrepancies in favor of the trust’s declared intent.
When a property was purchased shortly before the decedent’s death, or when an expected retitling process was interrupted, the deed may remain in the decedent’s personal name. These timing issues can create legal friction for trustees who need to sell or refinance. A Heggstad petition addresses that oversight by presenting evidence of intent to include the property in the trust. Courts then have the authority to confirm trust ownership so administrators and trustees can proceed with necessary transactions without prolonged uncertainty.
If you are in La Selva Beach or nearby Santa Cruz County and face a title discrepancy involving a trust, local counsel can guide you through the Heggstad petition process. Local representation understands county rules, recorder practices, and how judges in the area typically address these petitions. We assist with document collection, preparing the petition and declarations, serving notice, and appearing at hearings. Practical local knowledge speeds the process and helps ensure filings meet regional requirements so that the court’s order will be accepted by title companies and recording offices.
Our firm provides focused legal guidance to trustees and families facing title discrepancies. We emphasize clear written petitions supported by documentary evidence and witness declarations to demonstrate the decedent’s intent. By taking a methodical approach to record gathering, title review, and court filings, we aim to minimize delays and reduce the risk of contested proceedings. Clients benefit from structured case management and prompt updates so trustees know what to expect throughout the process, from initial petition to final recording of the court order.
We also coordinate with title companies, county recorders, and other professionals to ensure the court’s order will be effective for the client’s intended transactions. That coordination helps prevent post-order hurdles when selling or refinancing property. Our team prepares the documentation necessary for recording and explains each step to trustees and beneficiaries, making the procedural aspects easier to manage during an already difficult time. Practical communication and attention to local requirements are central to the service we provide.
Additionally, our firm handles related trust matters that frequently arise alongside Heggstad petitions, such as trust modifications, trust certification, pour-over wills, and powers of attorney. This integrated perspective means clients receive guidance not only on correcting title but on how the resolution fits into the broader estate plan. We help trustees navigate subsequent tasks like distribution of assets and recording necessary documents, creating a comprehensive path from petition to final administration.
Our process begins with a thorough review of the trust and title records, followed by a clear plan for evidence gathering and notice. We prepare the petition and supporting declarations, coordinate service on interested parties, and file with the appropriate superior court. If a hearing is required, we present the factual record to the court and seek an order that can be recorded to correct title. After entry of the order, we assist with recording and any follow-up tasks necessary to complete the trust administration and enable property transactions.
The first step is to gather all relevant documents and assess the strength of the claim that the property belongs to the trust. This includes obtaining the trust instrument, deeds, property tax records, and any communications that indicate the decedent’s intention. We also identify interested parties who must be notified. A careful assessment helps determine whether a Heggstad petition is the best remedy or whether alternative measures are required, and sets the stage for drafting persuasive and well-supported pleadings to present to the court.
Gathering the trust instrument, any amendments, and deed records is essential. These documents form the core of the factual presentation to the court and help demonstrate the decedent’s intent to place the property in the trust. We verify authenticity and chain of title, and identify any recorded encumbrances or liens that might affect the transfer. Thorough document collection avoids surprises later in the case and strengthens the petition by providing a clear connection between the trust provisions and the disputed property.
We determine who must be served with the petition, including beneficiaries, heirs, and known creditors. Proper identification and service help prevent procedural defects and reduce the chance of post-judgment challenges. Early outreach to interested parties can also reveal potential disputes that may require additional evidence or alternative legal strategies. By mapping relevant stakeholders at the outset, we ensure that the petition complies with notice rules and that the court can consider all relevant perspectives when deciding whether to confirm trust ownership.
In this step we draft the Heggstad petition and supporting declarations, assembling documentary evidence and any witness statements needed to show the decedent’s intent. The filing must comply with local court formatting and procedural requirements, including proof of service forms and proposed orders for the judge. Careful drafting anticipates potential objections and clearly frames the legal basis for the requested relief. A well-prepared filing increases the prospect of a prompt hearing and favorable outcome, and reduces the likelihood of follow-up evidentiary disputes.
Drafting involves writing a petition that explains the factual background, cites relevant law, and attaches evidentiary exhibits such as the trust and deeds. Declarations by the successor trustee and supporting witnesses provide first-hand accounts of the decedent’s intent and the steps taken to fund the trust. Exhibits must be organized and referenced clearly so the court can assess the documents efficiently. Preparing a compelling factual record reduces the need for lengthy hearings and helps the judge reach a decision based on the written materials and sworn declarations.
After filing the petition, we ensure that all required parties are properly served and that proof of service is filed with the court. Compliance with notice requirements is critical; failure to serve a necessary party can delay the case or require re-filing. We track deadlines for responses and prepare to address any objections. Timely and accurate filings help maintain momentum, and the court can schedule a hearing once service and procedural prerequisites are satisfied, permitting the judge to consider the petition and supporting evidence.
If the court requires a hearing, we present the written record and arguments to the judge to secure an order confirming trust ownership. Once the court issues the order, we assist with recording it and any resulting deeds or documents required by the county recorder. Recording the order corrects the public record and enables the trustee to proceed with transfers, sales, or other trust administration tasks. We follow up with title companies and recording offices to confirm the order’s effectiveness and address any remaining procedural items.
At the hearing, the court reviews the petition, declarations, and exhibits and considers any objections. We present a concise factual narrative, highlight key evidence demonstrating the decedent’s intent, and respond to legal questions the judge may raise. Clear presentation helps the court understand why an order confirming trust ownership is appropriate. If opposing parties raise issues, we address them with the available documentary record and legal arguments to support the trustee’s authority to manage the property under the trust.
Following entry of the court order, we record the order with the county recorder and prepare any follow-up deeds or documents necessary to place the property squarely in the trust’s name. Recording creates a permanent public record that title companies and lenders rely on, enabling sales or financing to proceed. We also advise trustees on post-order steps such as addressing liens, notifying tax authorities if needed, and updating trust asset inventories to reflect the resolved title so that final distributions or other transactions can move forward smoothly.
A Heggstad petition asks the court to recognize that property appearing in a decedent’s name was intended to be trust property, enabling the successor trustee to convey or manage the asset under the trust. It is appropriate when the trust instrument and other documentation support that intent, and when correcting title through a judicial declaration will facilitate transactions like sales or refinancing. The petition centers on demonstrating the decedent’s intent and providing the court with a factual record that links the property to the trust. This remedy often avoids the need for a full probate proceeding, saving time and expense. Filing a petition requires assembling the trust document, deeds, and declarations or other evidence that show intent to include the property in the trust. The trustee must also identify interested parties and comply with notice requirements. If interested parties agree, the court may grant the petition with limited proceedings. If disputes arise, additional hearings or discovery may be necessary, which can extend the timeline. Preparing a thorough and well-documented petition from the start increases the chance of a prompt favorable outcome.
The timeline for a Heggstad petition varies based on local court calendars, the completeness of the documentary record, and whether the petition is contested. In uncontested cases with complete documentation and proper service, courts can sometimes resolve petitions within a few months. However, scheduling hearings, serving interested parties, and allowing time for responses can add weeks or months. County-specific practices and the court’s workload are significant factors, so local timing expectations should be discussed at the outset. If the petition is contested or requires additional evidence, the process can extend considerably. Discovery, witness preparation, and additional hearings increase the duration and cost. Working proactively to collect comprehensive evidence and to communicate with beneficiaries can reduce the likelihood of contest and accelerate the timeline. Early coordination with title companies and recorders also helps prevent delays after the court issues an order.
Supporting evidence for a Heggstad petition typically includes a copy of the trust agreement and any amendments, deeds or title documents, and affidavits or declarations from witnesses or the successor trustee describing the decedent’s intent. Property tax records, correspondence about the decedent’s estate planning decisions, and trust schedules that reference the asset can also be useful. The quality and coherence of the documentary record strongly influence the court’s decision to confirm trust ownership. Affidavits or declarations should be sworn and clearly explain the facts surrounding the asset and the decedent’s statements or actions showing intent to transfer the property into the trust. Organized exhibits and a clear narrative linking the trust terms to the specific property reduce ambiguity. Where uncertainties exist, additional corroborating evidence can strengthen the case and anticipate challenges from other interested parties.
A Heggstad petition is designed as an alternative to opening a full probate estate when the primary issue is correcting title to align with a trust. In many situations, a Heggstad petition allows the court to resolve the narrow issue of trust ownership without subjecting the estate to broader probate administration. That said, if other estate problems exist—such as unresolved creditor claims or disputes over distribution—the court may require additional procedures or a different remedy that resembles probate. When the facts are straightforward and the trust documentation is persuasive, the petition can avoid probate and provide a targeted judicial determination. If the case is contested or there are related estate administration needs, the process can become more involved and may overlap with probate procedures. Assessing all estate issues early helps determine the most efficient legal path.
Interested parties typically include trust beneficiaries, heirs at law, and known creditors who have a potential claim against the estate. Proper service of the petition on these parties is a procedural requirement in California and helps ensure the court’s order is effective and final. The trustee must identify and notify these individuals in accordance with statutory notice rules and local court practice. Failure to provide proper notice can delay the case and undermine the court’s ability to issue a binding order. Because notice rules can be technical, it is important to identify all potential interested parties early in the process and to follow statutory methods for service. Sometimes publishing notice or serving through alternative authorised means is necessary if parties cannot be located. Accurate proof of service must be filed with the court to demonstrate compliance and to allow the petition to proceed toward resolution.
Title companies typically require a recorded court order that confirms trust ownership before closing a sale or issuing a new title policy that reflects the trust as owner. In the absence of that order, many title insurers will not close because the recorded deed does not match the claimed ownership. Coordinating the petition process with the lender and title company in advance helps identify what documentation they will accept and whether escrow can be structured to address temporary gaps during the process. Occasionally, alternative arrangements like escrow holdbacks or indemnity agreements are possible, but they involve additional negotiation and risk. The safest route for a clean closing is to obtain the court order and record any necessary deeds so the title is clear for the buyer and the title insurer. Early consultation with the title company clarifies requirements and avoids surprises at closing.
If beneficiaries contest a Heggstad petition, the proceeding can shift from a largely documentary process to a contested hearing with additional discovery and evidentiary requirements. Contesting parties may challenge the sufficiency of the evidence that the property belonged to the trust or assert competing claims. When disputes arise, the court evaluates the totality of the evidence, including declarations, documents, and witness testimony, to determine the decedent’s intent and rightful ownership. Contests can lengthen the process and increase costs for all parties involved. To manage disputes effectively, trustees should gather thorough documentation and consider negotiation or mediation to resolve disagreements where possible. If litigation becomes necessary, a prepared factual record and a clear legal strategy help present the trustee’s position to the court. Early legal guidance helps trustees weigh settlement options and anticipate the potential course of a contested matter.
Alternatives to a Heggstad petition include opening a probate administration to transfer title through the probate court, using small estate procedures if the asset qualifies and statutory limits apply, or pursuing corrective deeds or affidavits in limited circumstances. Probate provides a comprehensive framework for transferring assets but is often more time-consuming and costly than a targeted Heggstad petition. Which route is appropriate depends on factors such as the property value, the clarity of trust documentation, creditors’ claims, and the presence of disputes among heirs or beneficiaries. Evaluating alternatives requires a close look at the estate’s overall picture and the potential costs and timelines of each option. In some cases, initiating a Heggstad petition alongside other measures provides a balanced strategy, while in others, probate may be the only practical path. Careful legal assessment helps identify the most efficient and effective remedy.
The cost to file a Heggstad petition varies based on the complexity of the title issue, the amount of document preparation required, and whether the matter is contested. Costs typically include court filing fees, service fees, title searches, and legal fees for drafting the petition and declarations. Uncontested cases with straightforward documentation can be handled more economically, while contested matters or cases requiring substantial investigation and litigation will incur higher costs. Local filing fees and the need for certified document copies also affect the total expense. Discussing anticipated fees and a fee structure early helps trustees budget for the process. A clear scope of work that identifies necessary tasks, likely timelines, and possible contingencies gives families a realistic estimate. If the case is expected to remain uncontested, cost-effective solutions are often available to resolve title issues efficiently.
A Heggstad petition focuses on resolving ownership and title issues rather than directly addressing tax liabilities or creditor claims, but the court’s order can influence how those matters proceed. Confirming trust ownership clarifies who controls the asset and may affect timelines for creditor claims or tax filings associated with property sales or transfers. Trustees should continue to follow required notice procedures so creditors have an opportunity to assert legitimate claims under applicable law. The petition does not eliminate valid creditor rights but helps establish the trustee’s authority to handle the property while creditor matters are addressed. For tax matters, recording a court order may affect reporting and transfer-related obligations. Trustees should coordinate with tax advisors and consider potential tax consequences of sales or transfers following the petition’s resolution. Addressing tax and creditor concerns as part of the broader administration plan reduces surprises and helps the trustee fulfill duties with an informed perspective.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas