A Heggstad petition is a legal request used in California when a decedent intended to transfer assets into a trust but the asset title was never updated. In Pasatiempo and throughout Santa Cruz County, families commonly encounter this issue during estate administration when bank accounts, real property, or other assets remain titled in the deceased individual’s name. Pursuing a Heggstad petition asks the probate court to recognize that the asset was always meant to belong to the trust, allowing distribution under trust terms rather than through intestate procedures. This remedy helps avoid unnecessary probate delay and ensures the settlor’s wishes are respected.
Many clients first learn about Heggstad petitions while handling trust administration tasks and discovering mismatched titles or incomplete transfers. The petition process involves preparing evidence showing the decedent’s intent to fund the trust, such as trust documents, transfer instructions, bank communications, and witness statements. Filing a petition can streamline estate settlement by bringing improperly titled assets under trust administration. For residents of Pasatiempo, working with counsel familiar with local court practices and Santa Cruz County procedures can reduce friction, clarify timelines, and support a quicker resolution for heirs and trustees seeking to conclude the estate responsibly.
A Heggstad petition is important because it can correct title defects without forcing assets through full probate, preserving the settlor’s intent for distribution and maintaining privacy. When the court grants the petition, the asset is treated as if it had been properly transferred to the trust before death, allowing trustees to manage or distribute it under trust terms. This can save time and expense for beneficiaries, avoid additional court oversight associated with probate, and reduce the administrative burden on family members. For those in Pasatiempo, choosing this path often leads to a more orderly settlement and fewer disputes among heirs.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provides estate planning and trust administration services tailored to clients throughout Silicon Valley and Santa Cruz County. Our approach emphasizes careful documentation, clear communication with trustees and beneficiaries, and practical solutions for title and trust funding problems such as those addressed by a Heggstad petition. We guide clients through evidence gathering, prepare court filings, and coordinate with banks and title companies to present a compelling case. For local families in Pasatiempo, we aim to reduce stress and provide steady support during the probate and trust administration process.
A Heggstad petition asks the probate court to treat a particular asset as if it had been funded into a trust prior to the settlor’s death. This remedy is commonly used when a trust has been properly executed but some assets remain in the decedent’s individual name due to oversight or administrative delay. The petition requires clear evidence of intent to transfer the asset, and the court examines documentation and testimony to determine whether the transfer should be recognized. The result, if granted, places the asset under the trust so the trustee can manage or distribute it according to the trust’s terms.
The evidence supporting a Heggstad petition often includes the trust instrument, contemporaneous instructions, account signature cards, correspondence showing intent to retitle, and declarations from those who assisted with estate planning. California law focuses on the settlor’s intent and whether it is sufficiently demonstrated to justify treating the asset as trust property. While not every situation will qualify, many assets that were intended to be transferred but never retitled can be successfully included in the trust via this proceeding. Proper preparation and a persuasive factual record are essential to achieving a favorable outcome.
A Heggstad petition seeks a court order declaring that certain property belonged to a trust when the settlor died despite the absence of formal title changes. The petition explains why the asset should be treated as a trust asset, demonstrates the settlor’s intent, and proposes the legal remedy needed to allow the trustee to assume control. Commonly petitioned items include bank accounts, certificates of deposit, real property, and transfer-on-death arrangements that were intended to fund the trust. The procedure helps align asset ownership with estate planning documents and assists trustees in carrying out the settlor’s written directions.
Success in a Heggstad petition depends on assembling a clear factual record and presenting a persuasive argument to the court. Important elements include the original trust document, any contemporaneous transfer instructions, communications with financial institutions, transfer or beneficiary designation paperwork, and witness declarations supporting the settlor’s intent. The process typically involves filing a petition in the probate court, serving interested parties, and submitting declarations and exhibits. If challenged, the matter may require a hearing where testimony and documentary evidence further support the request to treat the asset as trust property.
Understanding terminology helps trustees and heirs navigate the Heggstad petition process with greater confidence. Key terms include settlor, trustee, intestate, probate, title, trust funding, and petition. These concepts relate to who created the trust, who manages trust assets, how assets are properly titled, and the legal procedures used to correct funding errors. Familiarity with these terms prepares families for discussions with counsel and court staff, assists in gathering required documents, and clarifies the legal objectives when seeking court recognition of trust ownership for specific assets.
Settlor refers to the person who creates and signs a trust document, directing how assets are to be managed and distributed. The settlor’s written instructions and actions determine the trust’s terms and often reveal intent to fund the trust with particular assets. When assets are not retitled as intended, the settlor’s expressed wishes, contemporaneous actions, and communications become key evidence in a Heggstad petition seeking recognition that the asset was meant to be part of the trust estate.
Trust funding describes the process of transferring legal title or beneficiary designation of assets into the name of the trust so they are governed by the trust document. Funding may involve retitling real property, changing account registrations, or designating the trust as the beneficiary of retirement accounts. Incomplete funding is the common reason parties file Heggstad petitions, which ask the court to treat specific assets as though they had been properly transferred to the trust before the settlor’s death.
Trustee is the individual or institution named in the trust who holds legal title to trust assets and is responsible for managing, investing, and distributing those assets according to the trust’s instructions. When a Heggstad petition is granted, the trustee’s authority expands to include the subject asset so it can be managed and distributed under the trust. Trustees must follow fiduciary duties and document their actions to preserve clarity for beneficiaries and for the court if asked to demonstrate proper administration.
A probate court declaration is a formal court order that resolves property ownership or administration disputes following death. In the context of a Heggstad petition, the declaration recognizes that the subject asset should be treated as trust property despite defects in title retitling. That judicial determination allows trustees to proceed under the trust without traditional probate administration, aligning asset control and distribution with the settlor’s documented wishes and providing legal authority for handling disputed items.
When assets are not properly retitled to a trust, families can pursue several paths: a Heggstad petition to treat the items as trust property, a full probate administration, or other remedial filings depending on the asset type. A Heggstad petition seeks a focused judicial declaration that avoids full probate for the disputed asset, whereas probate takes the entire estate through court-supervised administration. Alternative remedies may include informal affidavits for small accounts or direct negotiation with financial institutions. Choosing the right option depends on the asset value, the clarity of evidence of intent, and the family’s goals for privacy and speed.
A targeted Heggstad petition may be sufficient when paperwork and communications clearly show the settlor intended the asset to be placed in the trust. Documents such as signed trust instruments, written transfer instructions, account change requests, or contemporaneous correspondence with bankers or attorneys can demonstrate intent. When this documentary evidence is consistent and persuasive, the court may accept the petition and recognize the asset as trust property, avoiding the need for full probate administration and allowing the trustee to proceed under the trust’s terms.
A Heggstad petition often proceeds smoothly when beneficiaries and interested parties agree on the settlor’s intent and do not contest the transfer. In such situations, the court can focus on the documentary record and declarations rather than extensive litigation. Agreement among parties reduces delays and legal costs, and it increases the likelihood of the court granting the petition. For families in Pasatiempo seeking a practical resolution, cooperation and clear evidence make a focused court filing an effective way to align asset ownership with the trust.
A comprehensive legal approach is advisable when asset histories are complex or title records conflict. Real property ownership, account registrations, and beneficiary designations can contain discrepancies that require careful review, research, and sometimes corrective filings. In these cases, assembling a comprehensive evidentiary record, communicating with third parties, and preparing persuasive legal arguments are necessary to obtain a favorable judicial determination. A detailed approach reduces the risk of a contested outcome and helps trustees manage assets with confidence after a court ruling.
When there is potential for challenges by heirs, beneficiaries, or creditors, a broader legal strategy helps protect the trust and its assets. These situations may require additional notices, careful handling of creditor claims, and litigation preparation. A comprehensive plan anticipates objections, documents the settlor’s intent thoroughly, and creates a defensible record for the court. This helps reduce the chance of future disputes and ensures that the trustee can carry out distributions in line with the trust while addressing competing claims in a legally sound manner.
A comprehensive petition strategy reduces uncertainty, supports orderly asset management, and can minimize delays in trust administration. By compiling thorough documentary support, communicating proactively with beneficiaries and institutions, and preparing for possible objections, trustees create a persuasive record that helps the court reach a prompt decision. This approach also helps preserve family relationships by reducing surprises and offering transparent explanations for the chosen course of action. Ultimately, a well-prepared petition streamlines the transfer of assets into trust ownership and supports timely distributions.
Comprehensively addressing title defects also reduces the risk of subsequent litigation and clarifies trustee authority for future financial transactions. When the court issues an order recognizing trust ownership, banks, title companies, and other institutions are more likely to accept trustee instructions without requiring additional proof. This minimizes administrative obstacles and helps trustees fulfill their duties efficiently. For families in Pasatiempo, a careful, complete process provides peace of mind and a conclusive resolution to asset ownership issues that might otherwise cause prolonged uncertainty.
One significant benefit of a comprehensive approach is faster access to assets by the trustee. When the court agrees that an asset should be part of the trust, institutions are generally more willing to release funds or transfer title to the trustee. This faster access helps trustees meet immediate financial obligations such as mortgage payments, taxes, or ongoing household expenses. Ensuring clear legal authority through a court order reduces administrative obstacles and supports a smoother transition for beneficiaries who rely on timely distributions or asset management.
A full and careful petition process reduces the risk of future disputes by producing a robust evidentiary record that demonstrates the settlor’s intent. Clear documentation and judicial findings provide legal protection for trustee actions and minimize grounds for later challenges. This clarity helps preserve family relationships and reduces the expense of defending distributions or decisions down the line. By addressing potential issues before they escalate, trustees and beneficiaries benefit from greater stability and a more predictable resolution to estate administration matters.
Begin by collecting all relevant estate planning documents, account statements, transfer instructions, and correspondence showing intent to fund the trust. Include original trust documents, copies of beneficiary designations, bank signature cards, and any letters or emails that reference transferring specific assets. Also gather witness contact information for declarations that can support the petition. Early assembly of this material reduces delays and allows a clear, focused petition to be prepared, improving the chances of a favorable judicial finding and avoiding unnecessary litigation.
Engage with banks, title companies, and other institutions early to learn their documentation requirements and any forms they may accept to release funds or transfer title. Some institutions have established processes for recognizing court orders or trustee authority but may request particular evidence. Coordinating in advance reduces surprises, speeds processing once a court order is obtained, and helps avoid repeated requests for additional paperwork. Clear coordination also helps trustees plan cash flow and manage assets responsibly during administration.
Consider a Heggstad petition when assets were intended to fund a revocable living trust but were never retitled, and those assets are significant enough to affect distribution or administration. If an account or property remains in the decedent’s name, the trustee may lack authority to manage it, creating hardship for beneficiaries or delays in paying debts and expenses. Filing a petition can confirm that the asset belongs to the trust and allow timely management or distribution according to the settlor’s instructions, avoiding broader probate administration for that property.
Also consider this remedy when banks or title companies decline to accept trustee instructions without a court order, when clarity is needed to prevent family conflict, or when avoiding the greater expense and publicity of full probate is a priority. The petition can offer a focused, legally recognized pathway to align asset ownership with the trust document. For families in Pasatiempo, a well-managed petition often preserves privacy and helps complete trust administration efficiently and in keeping with the settlor’s wishes.
Typical circumstances include recently created trusts where some assets were overlooked, transfers interrupted by illness or death, accounts with missing beneficiary designations, and real property where deeds were never changed. Sometimes financial institutions require evidence of transfer before allowing trustee access, and other times beneficiaries discover assets not accounted for in the trust inventory. These scenarios prompt trustees to pursue a Heggstad petition to align asset ownership with the settlor’s estate plan and avoid complications that could impede administration or distribution.
Overlooked accounts and properties often arise when a trust is created but not all assets are retitled. Life events, administrative oversight, or timing issues can leave bank accounts, investment accounts, or real estate incorrectly held in the decedent’s name. A Heggstad petition addresses these oversights by presenting evidence that the settlor intended such assets to be trust property. This judicial recognition allows trustees to manage or distribute those assets under the trust, bringing the estate into alignment with the settlor’s written plan.
Some financial institutions require a formal court order before accepting trustee instructions, especially when account registrations do not reflect the trust or when signature cards are ambiguous. In these cases, a Heggstad petition provides the court direction that institutions often need to release funds or retitle property to the trustee. Filing a petition clarifies the trustee’s legal authority and reduces the likelihood of prolonged negotiations or losses due to inability to access estate assets in a timely manner.
Conflicting beneficiary designations, partial retitling, or inconsistent documentation can make it difficult to determine proper ownership. When paperwork does not uniformly reflect the settlor’s intent, the probate court can review the evidence and, through a Heggstad petition, issue an order that resolves the conflict. This judicial resolution helps prevent competing claims and enables the trustee to move forward with administration under the trust, providing clarity and legal authority for handling disputed assets.
If you are facing title problems or unclear asset ownership in Pasatiempo, the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman can help prepare and present a Heggstad petition to the Santa Cruz County probate court. We assist with document collection, drafting declarations, communicating with institutions, and filing the petition. Our goal is to achieve an efficient resolution that recognizes the settlor’s intent and places the asset under trust administration so trustees can proceed with confidence. Local knowledge of court procedures helps streamline the process for families.
Our firm focuses on clear, practical solutions for trust funding issues and probate-related matters. We prioritize careful document review, proactive communication with trustees and beneficiaries, and diligent preparation of court filings to support a Heggstad petition. By assembling a compelling evidentiary record and coordinating with financial institutions, we help clients move toward a definitive court order that aligns asset ownership with the trust. Our approach emphasizes transparency, responsiveness, and a commitment to resolving title problems efficiently for local families.
We understand the emotional and administrative challenges families face when assets intended for a trust remain incorrectly titled. Our work includes guiding trustees through steps to secure temporary access when possible, advising on evidence collection, and preparing the materials necessary for a persuasive petition. For residents of Pasatiempo and surrounding communities, that practical guidance reduces delay and improves the prospects for a favorable outcome that honors the settlor’s documented wishes and facilitates final distribution of trust assets.
We also work to minimize disruption to family routines and finances during administration, seeking efficient resolutions that limit court time and expense. Our team communicates regularly about case progress, expected timelines, and any institution-specific requirements. When needed, we represent trustees at hearings and respond to challenges in a measured manner aimed at resolving disputes quickly. This steady support helps beneficiaries understand the process and move forward once the court recognizes the trust’s claim to the subject assets.
Our process begins with an initial review of the trust and the allegedly untitled asset, followed by a checklist of documents and potential witnesses. We then collect and organize evidence, draft the petition and supporting declarations, and file with the appropriate probate court. During the proceeding we serve interested parties and respond to inquiries from institutions or heirs. If a hearing is required, we present the case and supporting testimony. After a court order is obtained, we assist with presenting the order to institutions to effect the transfer or release of assets to the trustee.
The initial stage focuses on gathering the necessary documentation and understanding the asset’s history. We review the trust document, any intent-related correspondence, account statements, deeds, beneficiary forms, and records of communications with financial institutions. We also identify potential declarants who can attest to the settlor’s intent and collect their statements. This careful intake establishes the foundation for a targeted petition and helps anticipate potential objections or additional information the court may seek.
We examine the trust instrument to determine the settlor’s instructions and identify the trustee authorized to act. Reviewing asset records and account histories reveals whether partial transfers occurred, when transfer attempts were made, and any institutional responses. This analysis helps craft a clear narrative demonstrating why each disputed asset should be deemed part of the trust. A strong documentary package reduces the need for extended testimony and can often lead to a more expeditious judicial determination.
Witness statements and sworn declarations support the documentary record by describing contemporaneous conversations, instructions, and actions that reflect the settlor’s intent. Declarations from family members, advisors, or bank personnel who assisted with account changes can be powerful evidence. We help identify appropriate declarants, prepare clear declarations, and ensure supporting exhibits are organized for easy review by the court. These narratives complement the documentary evidence and strengthen the petition’s presentation.
After compiling evidence, we draft a petition that explains the factual background, attaches supporting documents, and articulates the legal basis for treating the asset as trust property. The petition includes proposed findings and requests that the court declare the asset to have been part of the trust at the time of the settlor’s death. We then file the petition in the Santa Cruz County probate court, serve required parties, and provide institutions with copies as needed. Proper drafting anticipates likely questions and frames the evidence clearly for judicial review.
Filing involves submitting the petition and all supporting exhibits according to local court rules and calendaring any required hearings. We ensure that required forms, notices, and service procedures are completed to prevent procedural challenges. Attention to local filing practices and timelines improves the petition’s efficiency and reduces the need for amendments. Timely and accurate filing helps move the matter toward a judicial determination that will allow trustees to manage or distribute the contested assets under the trust.
After filing, interested parties must be notified according to statutory service requirements. We prepare and serve notices, respond to inquiries from heirs, and coordinate with financial institutions that may request additional documentation. If objections arise, we assess their merit and work to resolve disputes through negotiation or through court briefing and hearings. Maintaining clear communication during this phase can often resolve potential conflicts without protracted litigation and keep the process focused on the evidence supporting the trust claim.
If a hearing is required, we present the petition, exhibits, and witness declarations to the probate court, explaining why the asset should be treated as trust property. The court reviews the evidence and may issue an order recognizing the trust’s ownership. Once the order is entered, we assist the trustee in delivering the order and any required documentation to banks, title companies, or other institutions to effect transfers or release funds. This final step completes the transition of the asset into trust administration.
At the hearing, the court considers documentary exhibits and any testimony supporting the settlor’s intent to fund the trust. Clear presentation and well-prepared declarations increase the likelihood of the court entering the proposed order. If there are objections, the hearing provides an opportunity to clarify facts and demonstrate why the petition should be granted. A thoughtful presentation reduces ambiguity and helps the judge reach a decision that reflects the settlor’s documented plans for asset distribution.
After obtaining the court order, we work with the trustee to present the order to relevant institutions to effect changes in title or access to funds. Banks and title companies typically accept a certified copy of the order along with trustee identification and proof of trust terms. We assist in preparing the necessary forms and following institutional procedures to complete transfers. This practical assistance helps minimize delays after the court’s ruling and ensures the trustee can proceed with administration under the trust.
A Heggstad petition is a legal filing in probate court asking the judge to declare that a particular asset was intended to be part of a trust at the time of the settlor’s death despite the absence of formal retitling. It is used when an asset remains titled in the decedent’s name but contemporaneous documents or actions demonstrate the settlor directed the asset to be held in trust. The petition seeks judicial recognition so the trustee can manage or distribute the asset under the trust rather than through probate. This focused remedy addresses discrete funding errors and can preserve the settlor’s distribution plan. The petition process relies on evidence of intent, such as trust documents, transfer instructions, account applications, and witness declarations. The court examines whether the preponderance of the evidence shows the asset should be treated as trust property. If the judge grants the petition, the order allows the trustee to present the court’s determination to banks or title companies and effectuate transfers. The procedure helps avoid full probate for specific items and supports efficient trust administration when documentation is strong.
Timing for a Heggstad petition varies based on the complexity of the title issues, the court’s calendar, and whether interested parties object. In straightforward cases with clear documentary evidence and cooperating beneficiaries, the process can be relatively quick, often measured in a few months from intake to court order. Local filing procedures, required notices, and any institutional responses can affect timing, and Santa Cruz County court schedules may influence how soon a hearing is available. Early organization of documents helps expedite preparation and filing. When objections occur or additional evidence is needed, the timeline can extend as the parties address disputes and the court considers testimony or supplemental exhibits. Preparing a thorough petition from the outset reduces the likelihood of delays. After a court order is obtained, additional time may be required to work with banks or title companies to implement transfers, but the judicial determination significantly clarifies the trustee’s authority and helps move the administration forward.
Varied asset types can be included in a Heggstad petition, including bank accounts, certificates of deposit, investment accounts, real estate, and any property intended to be owned by the trust. The key factor is demonstrating that the settlor intended the asset to be part of the trust before death, even if title was never changed. Retirement accounts and vehicles with specific titling nuances may require alternative procedures or beneficiary designation review. Each asset category has institution-specific requirements that the petition must address. For real property, deeds and transfer records are examined; for bank and investment accounts, signature cards, account change requests, and beneficiary forms are reviewed. Effective petitions compile these documents and supporting declarations to create a convincing record. Identifying the most relevant exhibits and presenting them cohesively to the court increases the prospects that the judge will recognize the asset as trust property and allow the trustee to manage it under the trust terms.
Yes, California procedures require notice to interested parties in probate matters, and beneficiaries and heirs typically must be notified of a Heggstad petition. This notice allows interested persons an opportunity to review the petition and raise concerns or objections if they believe the asset should not be treated as trust property. Proper service of notice is an important procedural requirement and helps ensure the court’s order is binding and enforceable once entered. Timely, accurate notice also limits later challenges to the court’s determination. Even when beneficiaries receive notice, many petitions proceed without substantive objections when documentary evidence of the settlor’s intent is clear. Open communication with beneficiaries prior to filing often reduces surprises and increases the chance of a cooperative resolution. When objections are raised, the court will consider the evidence and may schedule a hearing to resolve disputes, at which point testimony and additional exhibits can clarify the settlor’s intent and the appropriate remedy.
Documentary evidence is often the most persuasive material for a Heggstad petition. This includes the original trust document, contemporaneous written instructions to transfer assets, signed account change forms, correspondence with financial institutions indicating a desire to fund the trust, and records of partial transfers. Declarations from people who assisted with estate planning or witnessed transfer attempts provide valuable context. Together, these items create a factual narrative showing the settlor intended the asset to be part of the trust prior to death. Clear timelines and consistent documentation strengthen the petition. When records show attempts to retitle accounts or close transactions in favor of the trust, the court is more likely to grant relief. Banks’ internal notes or communications confirming transfer requests can be particularly persuasive. The goal is to present a coherent, well-supported story that demonstrates the settlor’s intent and justifies the court’s recognition of the asset as trust property.
A Heggstad petition can avoid full probate for a particular asset by obtaining a court order that recognizes that asset as trust property. However, it does not necessarily remove the need for probate for other estate assets that are not part of the trust or where a different remedy is required. The petition is a targeted tool designed to address funding defects for specific items. When the contested asset represents a significant portion of the estate, resolving its status through a petition can substantially reduce the scope of probate, but each situation requires careful review. If most estate assets are properly titled to the trust, a successful petition for the remaining items can allow trustees to administer the estate primarily under the trust framework. Where numerous or complicated assets remain outside the trust, full probate may still be necessary. Evaluating each asset’s status and weighing the costs and timelines of various approaches helps determine whether petitions, probate, or alternative remedies best meet the family’s goals.
Financial institutions generally accept a certified court order recognizing trust ownership, but acceptance may depend on the institution’s policies and the clarity of the order. After the court issues a declaration, banks and title companies usually process transfers or release funds upon receipt of the order and accompanying trustee documentation. Occasionally an institution may request additional paperwork or clarifications, which we address by preparing the forms they require and following institutional procedures to complete the transfer. Coordination with institutions early in the process helps identify specific documentation they will want once the court’s order is obtained. Presenting a clear certified order, trustee identification, and any required forms reduces back-and-forth and expedites implementation. When institutions raise concerns, providing supplemental documentation or a clarifying court filing often resolves issues and allows the trustee to assume control of the property.
If an heir objects to the petition, the court will evaluate the objection along with the petitioner’s evidence and may schedule a hearing to resolve disputed facts. Objections can raise questions about the settlor’s intent, competing claims, or the sufficiency of documentation. In such cases, additional declarations, testimony, or documentary evidence may be necessary to support the petition. The process can take longer if contested, but the court’s role is to weigh the evidence and issue a reasoned determination based on the record presented. Often, objections can be addressed through discussion, clarification of documents, or limited discovery to resolve factual issues. When litigation is required, the proceedings focus on proving the settlor’s intent and the factual circumstances surrounding title changes or attempted transfers. Preparing a robust evidentiary record from the outset helps limit the impact of objections and increases the likelihood of a favorable outcome at hearing.
Alternatives to a Heggstad petition include informal institution-specific procedures for small accounts, direct negotiation with banks or title companies, or probate administration where appropriate. Some institutions have streamlined processes for small balances or uncontested transfers, and in limited cases affidavits or other administrative forms may resolve the matter without court involvement. When the asset value is modest or the documentation is straightforward, exploring these alternatives can be cost-effective. However, when institutions decline to act, when beneficiaries dispute ownership, or when clarity and legal authority are required, a Heggstad petition remains the most reliable remedy for obtaining a binding court determination. Evaluating the pros and cons of litigation versus administrative fixes on a case-by-case basis ensures families choose the most practical and efficient path to resolve title problems.
Costs for a Heggstad petition vary depending on the complexity of the title issues, the amount of document preparation, and whether the petition is contested. In uncontested matters with clear documentation, fees are generally limited to drafting and filing costs and time for obtaining and presenting declarations, which can be modest relative to full probate. When hearings, additional discovery, or institution-specific requirements arise, costs increase accordingly. Early assessment and document collection reduce the need for extra work and help control expenses. Court filing fees and service costs are additional predictable expenses, and institutions may charge for lien searches or record copies. When evaluating potential costs, consider the value of avoiding full probate and the time savings a petition can offer. A detailed consultation identifies likely costs and helps families weigh the financial trade-offs among filing a petition, pursuing alternatives, or initiating probate for the estate.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas