If you are considering a trust modification petition in Rio Del Mar, this guide explains when a petition may be appropriate and how the process typically works. The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman assists individuals and families with adjustments to existing trusts to reflect life changes, shifting assets, or to correct drafting issues. A trust modification petition asks the court to approve changes when parties cannot make those changes through trust provisions or mutual agreement. This introduction outlines practical steps, common reasons for filing, and what to expect from the court process so you can make informed choices about your trust administration and long term goals.
Many people assume a trust cannot be changed after it is created, but under California law there are circumstances that allow for amendment or reformation through a petition to the court. The petition can address mistakes, changed circumstances, or problems that interfere with the settlor’s intent. Filing a petition involves submitting documentation, legal argument, and sometimes notifying interested parties or beneficiaries. Understanding potential timelines, costs, and likely outcomes up front helps families plan and reduces uncertainty. This section provides a realistic overview of how the process can protect beneficiaries interests and preserve the settlor’s original intentions when informal resolution is not possible.
A trust modification petition can be a vital tool when formal court approval is necessary to correct or adjust trust terms. Benefits include clarifying ambiguity, resolving drafting mistakes, and updating provisions to reflect changed family or financial circumstances. When informal amendments are not possible because a settlor is incapacitated or parties disagree, a petition provides a structured legal path to achieve outcomes consistent with original intent. The court process also creates an enforceable record that reduces future disputes, helps prevent asset misallocation, and offers beneficiaries a transparent resolution when trust administration is contested or uncertain.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman serves clients across California with a focus on estate planning and trust administration matters. Our approach to trust modification petitions centers on careful analysis of trust documents, clear communication with beneficiaries, and practical legal strategy tailored to each family situation. We provide guidance on filing petitions, preparing court filings, and handling notices to interested parties while aiming to minimize delay and reduce conflict. The firm is available by phone at 408-528-2827 and offers consultations to discuss whether a petition is appropriate and what potential outcomes might be for your specific trust concerns.
A trust modification petition is a formal request to the probate court to change, reform, or clarify the terms of a trust when private amendment is not possible. Grounds for filing include correcting mistakes in the document, addressing unforeseen changes in circumstances, or conforming trust language to what the settlor intended. The process typically requires proving the need for modification with evidence such as declarations, trust instruments, and supporting documents. Petitioners must follow procedural rules for filing, notifying interested persons, and attending hearings, and outcomes depend on the strength of the legal and factual basis presented to the court.
When preparing a petition, careful attention to detail is essential because courts review both the trust language and external evidence of intent. The petition should explain what change is sought, why it is necessary, and how it aligns with the settlor’s goals. Courts may consider testimony, exhibits, and relevant statutes or case law. In some cases the court can reform the trust to correct drafting errors; in others it may permit modifications for practical administration. Knowing the potential burdens of proof and the need to notify beneficiaries helps petitioners make strategic choices that increase the likelihood of a favorable resolution.
A trust modification petition is a legal filing asking the court to alter the terms or administration of an existing trust. It differs from informal amendments because it seeks judicial approval when consent is lacking, the settlor cannot act, or the trust contains ambiguous or erroneous provisions. The petition sets out the legal and factual reasons for the requested change, identifies interested persons, and proposes specific modifications or clarifications. Courts evaluate whether the request aligns with the settlor’s intent and whether modification is consistent with applicable law, making documentation and clear legal argument central to the petition process.
Successful petitions include several essential elements: a clear statement of the requested change, evidence supporting why the change is needed, identification and notice to beneficiaries and interested parties, and proposed amended language or court orders. The process involves drafting the petition, filing with the appropriate probate court, serving required notices, and attending a hearing where the court evaluates the request. Petitioners should prepare declarations, exhibits, and potential witness testimony. Addressing opposition proactively and proposing compromises can often streamline the proceeding and reduce emotional and financial costs for the family.
Understanding common terms helps demystify the petition process and clarifies expectations. This glossary explains frequently used phrases such as settlor, beneficiary, reformation, and nunc pro tunc orders. Knowing these terms improves communication with counsel and streamlines document review. Clear terminology also assists in preparing notices, affidavits, and declarations required by the court. Reviewing this glossary before filing a petition helps interested parties recognize their rights and obligations, and it ensures that filings accurately describe the requested changes and the legal grounds supporting them.
Settlor refers to the person who creates a trust and transfers assets into it. The settlor’s intent, as expressed in the trust instrument, is central to any petition that seeks modification or reformation. Courts carefully consider evidence of the settlor’s true intent when deciding whether to permit changes, especially if the settlor is unavailable or incapacitated. Understanding who the settlor is and reviewing their original estate planning documents, communications, and circumstances helps determine whether a petition has a strong foundation and whether requested changes faithfully reflect the settlor’s objectives.
Reformation is a judicial correction of a trust document to reflect the settlor’s actual intent when a drafting error or ambiguity prevents the document from accurately expressing that intent. A petition for reformation typically presents evidence showing the discrepancy between the written terms and the settlor’s intended provisions. Courts may reform trust language to correct mistakes if the proof supports that outcome. Reformation differs from simple amendment because it seeks to align the instrument with intent rather than create a new provision without clear prior intent.
A beneficiary is a person or entity entitled to receive benefits from a trust under its terms. Beneficiaries have rights to notice and to be heard in proceedings affecting trust terms or administration. When a petition seeks modification, beneficiaries may be required to receive formal notice so they can object or consent. Their interests and potential objections are factors courts review when evaluating petitions, and resolving beneficiary concerns through clear communication and appropriate legal argument is often key to achieving a fair and lasting resolution.
A nunc pro tunc order is a retroactive court directive that corrects the record to reflect what should have occurred at an earlier date. In trust matters, this type of order can be used to validate actions taken that were required but not properly documented, or to correct administrative oversights. When used with a modification petition, a nunc pro tunc order may align trust records with the settlor’s intent as of a past date. Courts grant such orders when the evidence supports retroactive correction and when doing so serves equity and clarity in trust administration.
When trust issues arise, there are several ways to pursue change: informal amendment if the settlor or all parties agree, mediation to reach a negotiated settlement, or a court petition when agreement cannot be reached. Each route has tradeoffs in cost, timeline, and finality. Informal amendment can be quickest but requires consent and capacity. Mediation encourages compromise and can preserve relationships. A court petition provides a definitive legal resolution when disputes persist, but involves formal procedures and potential hearing dates. Weighing these options against family dynamics and legal risks helps determine the best path forward.
A limited approach is appropriate when the settlor is available and expressly agrees to amend the trust according to documented instructions. In such cases, a simple amendment or restatement can reflect the desired changes without court involvement. This path is less costly and usually faster, and it avoids the emotional strain of litigation. Properly executed amendments should follow state formalities and be recorded with the trust file to ensure clarity for trustees and beneficiaries. Careful documentation reduces the likelihood of future disputes over the settlor’s intentions or the validity of changes made.
If all beneficiaries and interested persons agree to modify the trust and the settlor cannot or need not act, parties can often execute a written settlement or consent that amends administration without court approval. This approach requires clear signatures, notarization when appropriate, and attention to any trust provisions about amendment procedures. Reaching mutual agreement can preserve family relationships and limit legal fees. Even when consent is obtained, it is advisable to document the change carefully so trustees have authoritative instructions and beneficiaries have certainty about their rights and distributions going forward.
Comprehensive legal action becomes necessary when parties cannot agree on changes or when the settlor lacks capacity to amend the trust directly. In such situations, a court petition provides a structured legal process to resolve contested issues and clarify the trust’s terms. The court evaluates evidence about intent and circumstances to determine whether modification or reformation is appropriate. This formal route helps protect the interests of all parties by producing a definitive, enforceable result when informal negotiations have failed or when legal authority is required to act on behalf of an incapacitated settlor.
When drafting errors, ambiguous provisions, or inconsistencies create risk of misinterpretation, a petition can correct the document to align it with the settlor’s intent. Courts will consider extrinsic evidence to determine whether a reformation or clarification is warranted. Addressing these issues through a formal petition can prevent future disputes, litigation over distributions, and administrative confusion. The proceeding creates a clear official record of the correction, which is valuable for trustees, beneficiaries, and financial institutions that rely on accurate trust documents for asset management and transfers.
A comprehensive petition to modify or reform a trust offers legal finality and clarity when informal solutions are unavailable. Courts can issue orders that resolve uncertainty, authorize specific actions, and create enforceable terms. This formal resolution reduces the risk of future challenges and can be especially useful when valuable assets, retirement accounts, or complex distributions are involved. While court proceedings involve more procedure and time, the resulting order often provides peace of mind and certainty for trustees and beneficiaries who require an authoritative decision to move forward with administration or asset transfers.
Another benefit of a formal petition is the opportunity to consolidate related issues into one judicial proceeding, avoiding repeated disputes in different forums. The court process also ensures that interested parties receive notice and can be heard, which strengthens the legitimacy of the outcome. When matters involve ambiguous language, competing claims, or the need for retroactive correction, the court’s power to issue comprehensive orders helps preserve estate planning goals and reduces the likelihood of prolonged litigation over the same issues in the future.
A primary advantage of pursuing a formal petition is obtaining a court order that clearly defines rights, obligations, and the enforceable terms of the trust going forward. This legal finality limits later disagreement by providing an authoritative decision that trustees and beneficiaries must follow. Court orders become part of the public record and reduce ambiguity when financial institutions, successor trustees, or courts in other jurisdictions review trust instructions. The definitive nature of a judicial ruling can be particularly important in families with complex assets or contested distribution questions.
Formal petitions are valuable when vulnerable beneficiaries, retirement accounts, or significant real estate interests are at stake. Court involvement ensures proper safeguards are observed, including clear notice and the opportunity for interested persons to present views. The judicial record supports responsible administration and helps prevent misuse or misinterpretation of trust provisions. For trustees managing complex holdings, a court order confirming authority to act reduces exposure to future disputes and liability, providing a secure framework for managing and distributing trust assets in accordance with the settlor’s intended plan.
Begin by collecting the original trust instrument, any amendments, related wills such as a pour over will, powers of attorney, and health care directives. Include supporting documents like account statements, deeds, and correspondence that reflect the settlor’s intent or administrative actions. Having a complete file helps clarify the legal position and speeds case preparation. Organized documentation also assists in identifying beneficiaries and preparing required notices. Early document gathering reduces delays and strengthens the factual record needed to support a petition for modification or reformation in court.
When filing a petition, include precise proposed orders or redlined trust language to show the court exactly what change is requested. Clear drafts help the judge and other interested parties understand the scope and practical effect of the modification. Proposed wording should be consistent with the settlor’s intent and anticipate administrative consequences. Thoughtful drafting minimizes ambiguity and can expedite the court’s decision by reducing the need for supplemental filings or clarifying hearings. This preparation also helps trustees implement the court order promptly if approved.
People seek trust modification petitions for a variety of reasons, including correcting drafting mistakes, adapting to changed family circumstances, addressing unforeseen tax or asset consequences, and clarifying ambiguous language that impedes administration. When the settlor cannot amend the trust directly or when beneficiaries disagree about the proper course, a petition offers a judicial mechanism to align the trust with the settlor’s documented intent. Filing a petition can prevent ongoing administration problems and reduce the risk of successor trustees facing litigation or liability over disputed instructions.
Other reasons include resolving conflicts over distributions, addressing errors in beneficiary designations, or obtaining court authorization to handle unique assets like retirement accounts or business interests. Petitioning the court can also be the best way to obtain retroactive relief when actions were taken without proper documentation. Considering a petition early, before disputes escalate, often leads to a more efficient and less contentious resolution. Thoughtful assessment of goals and potential outcomes helps families decide whether mediation, informal amendment, or a petition is the right course.
Common circumstances include ambiguous trust provisions that create competing interpretations, clerical errors that change the intended meaning, changes in family structure like divorce or remarriage, and the settlor’s incapacity preventing direct amendment. Additionally, conflicts among beneficiaries over distributions or trustee powers often trigger the need for court involvement. When valuable assets are tied up by uncertainty, or when trustees face conflicting duties, a petition helps clarify authority and ensures proper administration in keeping with the settlor’s objectives.
When a trust contains drafting mistakes or unclear phrasing, trustees and beneficiaries may disagree about interpretation, leading to administrative paralysis or disputes. A petition for reformation or clarification allows the court to interpret or correct the document based on evidence of intent and surrounding circumstances. Resolving these issues in court provides a definitive reading and reduces the chance of future litigation. Addressing drafting problems promptly helps protect trust assets and ensures distributions occur according to the settlor’s wishes.
If the settlor becomes incapacitated and cannot sign an amendment, interested parties may need to pursue a court petition to modify or clarify trust provisions. Courts can evaluate evidence of the settlor’s prior intentions and approve changes that reflect those goals when appropriate. This option enables trustees and family members to respond to changed circumstances while maintaining legal compliance and protecting beneficiaries’ rights. A petition in these situations ensures that modifications are authorized through the judicial process rather than informal or potentially invalid actions.
Conflicts among beneficiaries or between trustees and beneficiaries over distributions, trustee authority, or administration decisions can necessitate a petition to resolve competing claims. The court provides a neutral forum to evaluate evidence and issue orders that define duties and rights going forward. Resolving disputes by petition can prevent escalation and provide an enforceable resolution. Judges consider the trust instrument, relevant statutes, and equitable principles when making determinations, aiming to honor the settlor’s intent while protecting the interests of those with standing in the matter.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provides personalized service for clients in Rio Del Mar and Santa Cruz County seeking trust modification petitions or related trust administration assistance. We assist with drafting petitions, preparing notices, and representing clients at hearings when necessary. Our approach emphasizes clear communication with trustees and beneficiaries and practical solutions tailored to local court practices. Call 408-528-2827 to discuss your situation and learn how a petition may address ambiguous provisions, correct errors, or adapt a trust to new circumstances in a way that supports orderly administration and protects beneficiary interests.
Clients choose the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman for trust modification matters because we focus on clear legal analysis and practical solutions that match each family’s needs. We invest time in reviewing trust documents and gathering supporting evidence so petitions are well founded and efficiently presented to the court. Our practice emphasizes client communication so you understand the filing timeline, options for resolution, and likely outcomes. We aim to reduce conflict by pursuing reasonable approaches that protect beneficiaries while preserving the settlor’s documented intent.
We also assist in evaluating alternatives to a court petition, such as mediation or negotiated settlement, when such options would better serve family dynamics and reduce expense. When a petition is necessary, we prepare thorough filings, coordinate notice to interested parties, and represent clients at hearings. Our goal is to obtain clear court orders that trustees can implement with confidence. We help clients weigh the practical implications of each approach and choose the path that best balances certainty, cost, and time considerations.
Throughout the process, the firm stays focused on protecting client interests and minimizing disruption to trust administration. We understand local judicial procedures in Santa Cruz County and can craft petitions that reflect both legal principles and practical considerations for trustees and beneficiaries. If you are unsure whether a petition is appropriate, contact us to discuss the specifics of your trust, the nature of the dispute or error, and the most constructive way to secure an effective and enforceable resolution.
Our process begins with a detailed review of the trust and related documents to identify the legal basis for a petition. We then gather evidence of the settlor’s intent, prepare the petition and proposed orders, and advise on required notices to beneficiaries and interested persons. After filing, we manage service, respond to inquiries, and represent clients at hearings. Throughout, we explain procedural steps, likely timelines, and potential outcomes so clients can make informed decisions. Our emphasis is on thorough preparation to present a clear and persuasive case to the court.
The first step is a comprehensive review of the trust instrument, amendments, wills, powers of attorney, and any related correspondence or evidence of the settlor’s intent. We assess whether the facts support a petition for modification or reformation and identify interested parties who must be notified. This stage includes discussing the client’s goals, evaluating alternatives, and outlining possible legal strategies and timelines. The assessment clarifies strengths and potential defenses the court may consider, enabling informed decision making before proceeding with formal filings.
Collecting all relevant documents helps build a clear factual record to support the petition. This includes the original trust instrument, any amendments, related wills, estate planning documents like advanced health care directives, and financial records that confirm asset titles and beneficiary designations. We also gather communications that reflect the settlor’s intent. A well organized document set streamlines drafting and supports declarations and exhibits that the court will review when deciding whether modification or reformation is warranted.
Identifying and properly notifying all persons with a legal interest in the trust is essential. Notice requirements vary, but may include beneficiaries, creditors in certain circumstances, and successor trustees. We prepare compliant notices and handle service to ensure the court process proceeds without procedural defects. Proper notice allows interested parties to respond, object, or consent, and the court considers whether notice was adequate when ruling on the petition. Addressing notice issues early avoids delays or the need to repeat filings.
After assessment and document collection, we draft the petition, proposed orders, and supporting declarations, making sure to present a clear factual and legal argument for the requested modification. The filing includes exhibits and evidence demonstrating why the change aligns with the settlor’s intent or is necessary for proper administration. We submit the petition to the appropriate probate court, coordinate service, and monitor any required filing deadlines. Strong drafting anticipates common objections and frames the requested relief in precise, enforceable language.
Supporting declarations and exhibits provide the factual foundation for the petition. These documents may include affidavits from persons with firsthand knowledge of the settlor’s intent, copies of correspondence, financial records, and expert declarations when appropriate. Clear and credible evidence helps the court understand the context and necessity for modification. We organize exhibits so they support the legal arguments and make it straightforward for the judge to evaluate whether the requested relief is consistent with the settlor’s wishes and California law.
Once the petition and supporting materials are filed, required parties must be served according to court rules. Service initiates their opportunity to object or consent. If objections arise, we prepare timely responses and negotiate resolutions when possible. If disputes remain, we present argument and evidence at the hearing. Managing objections effectively and addressing concerns promptly can narrow issues for the court and often leads to more focused proceedings, helping move the matter toward resolution while protecting client interests throughout the process.
The hearing is the opportunity to present the case to the court, explain the requested change, and respond to any objections. During the hearing the judge evaluates the petition, declarations, exhibits, and any testimony to determine whether modification or reformation is warranted. If the court grants the petition, it issues an order describing the approved changes. Implementation then follows the court order, allowing trustees to act with clear authority. If denied, there may be options for reconsideration or alternative strategies depending on the reasons for the ruling.
At the hearing the judge reviews the petition, supporting declaration, and exhibits, and may hear testimony from witnesses. Effective presentation summarizes why the change is necessary and how it aligns with the settlor’s intent, addressing any counterarguments. A well prepared case highlights documentary evidence, clarifies ambiguities, and shows the practical consequences of granting or denying the requested relief. Clear presentation helps the court reach a decision that supports orderly trust administration and preserves the settlor’s wishes whenever possible.
Once the court issues its order, trustees and beneficiaries should follow the directions precisely to implement changes to trust administration or distribution. The order becomes part of the official record, guiding transfers of assets, trustee actions, and any subsequent filings. We assist clients in interpreting and carrying out court orders, updating trust records, and communicating changes to financial institutions and successor trustees. Proper implementation ensures the court’s decision effectively resolves the issue and prevents future disputes about administration or authority.
A trust modification petition is a formal request to the probate court to change, clarify, or reform an existing trust when informal amendment is not possible. This is used in situations such as drafting errors, ambiguity in the trust language, changed family circumstances, or when the settlor is incapacitated and cannot sign an amendment. The petition explains the requested change and presents evidence that the modification aligns with the settlor’s intent or is required for proper administration. Filing a petition involves preparing the petition and supporting declarations, serving notice on interested persons, and attending a hearing where the court evaluates the evidence. The court may grant, deny, or modify the requested relief based on the legal standards and facts presented. Preparing a clear factual record and proposed orders increases the likelihood of a favorable outcome and reduces delays in trust administration.
Courts consider whether the requested reformation or modification reflects the settlor’s true intent, whether there was a mistake or ambiguity in the drafting, and whether equitable principles support the requested change. Judges review the trust instrument itself and extrinsic evidence such as communications, drafts, and testimony that illuminate the settlor’s objectives. The burden of proof and type of evidence required depends on the nature of the requested relief and the factual circumstances. The court also examines notice to beneficiaries and whether proposed changes affect others’ rights. Clear, credible documentation that explains the error or changed circumstances and links the proposed modification to the settlor’s intent strengthens the petition. Well prepared declarations and exhibits help the judge reconcile the trust language with the surrounding facts to reach a legally sound decision.
Interested persons typically include current beneficiaries, successor beneficiaries, trustees, and sometimes creditors depending on the nature of the petition. California law sets out notice requirements for trust proceedings, and proper service is essential to ensure the court may act without later procedural challenges. Identifying all persons with a legal interest helps avoid delays and ensures fairness in the process. We help clients identify and serve required parties and prepare compliant notices. When beneficiaries receive notice, they may consent or object; their responses shape the scope of the hearing and the court’s review. Addressing potential objections through clear documentation and early communication can reduce conflict and improve the chance of a timely resolution.
A trustee’s authority to make changes depends on the trust instrument and applicable law. Some trusts grant trustees limited powers to correct administrative matters, but substantive changes to distribution provisions or beneficiary designations generally require settlor consent or court approval. Trustees must follow the trust terms and act within their fiduciary duties to all beneficiaries. Taking unilateral steps outside those powers risks future disputes and potential liability. When changes are necessary but the trustee lacks clear authority, filing a petition provides the court’s approval and protection for the trustee’s actions. Courts can authorize specific actions or modifications to resolve uncertainty, enabling trustees to administer the trust with confidence and reducing the risk of later challenges by beneficiaries.
The timeline for a trust modification petition varies by case complexity, court schedules, and whether objections arise. Many straightforward petitions proceed in a few months, while contested matters may take longer due to briefing, hearings, and procedural requirements. Preparing comprehensive documentation and proactive communication can shorten the timeline. Local court calendars and required notice periods also influence scheduling and final resolution. Anticipating potential objections and planning for alternative dispute resolution can help keep the process efficient. We advise clients on realistic timelines based on local probate practice and help them prepare filings that reduce the likelihood of continuances or supplemental hearings, while ensuring all legal requirements are satisfied for a durable outcome.
Helpful evidence includes the trust instrument and any prior drafts, communications reflecting the settlor’s intent, correspondence with advisers or family, and financial records that show how assets were intended to be held or distributed. Witness declarations from those familiar with the settlor’s wishes can also be persuasive. Clear documentary support that links the requested change to the settlor’s intent strengthens the petition considerably. Organizing exhibits and preparing concise declarations that explain the relevance of each document makes it easier for the court to evaluate the request. We assist clients in assembling and presenting evidence in a way that highlights the factual basis for reform or modification and supports the legal arguments necessary to obtain court approval.
Alternatives to filing a court petition include informal amendment when the settlor and all interested parties agree, mediation to resolve disputes, or settlement agreements that produce written consents. These alternatives can be faster, less expensive, and better for family relationships when mutual agreement is possible. Informal solutions require careful documentation to ensure enforceability and to prevent future disputes. When agreement cannot be reached, mediation may still help narrow issues and reduce costs before a petition is filed. If negotiations fail, a court petition provides a formal path to resolution. Evaluating alternatives early helps clients choose the approach that balances time, cost, and the goal of achieving a durable outcome.
Courts may assess filing fees and other administrative costs associated with probate proceedings, and parties may also be responsible for service costs. These court costs are separate from attorney fees and vary by jurisdiction. Planning for these expenses helps clients understand the full cost of seeking judicial relief and can influence decisions about pursuing negotiation or mediation first. In some cases, courts can award fees or costs based on statutory authority or equitable principles when warranted, but outcomes are fact specific. We discuss anticipated court fees and likely overall costs during the initial consultation so clients have a clear picture of financial expectations and can make an informed decision about proceeding.
If beneficiaries object, the court will consider their arguments during the hearing and weigh the evidence presented by all parties. Objections can lengthen the process, require additional briefing or discovery, and may necessitate negotiation to narrow disputed issues. Courts make determinations based on legal standards, the trust instrument, and the credibility of evidence about the settlor’s intent. Resolving objections often involves addressing factual disputes and clarifying why the proposed change is appropriate. Engaging in early dialogue and attempting to resolve disagreements through mediation or negotiation can reduce contention and lead to a more efficient resolution. When objections persist, thorough preparation and clear evidence remain key to persuading the court that the requested modification should be granted for orderly trust administration.
To get started, collect the trust document, any amendments, wills, powers of attorney, and related correspondence, and schedule an initial consultation to review the facts. We will assess whether a petition is appropriate, identify interested parties, and outline options for proceeding. Early assessment helps clarify the likely path and whether alternatives such as mediation are viable. During the consultation we explain required documentation, likely timelines, and anticipated costs so you can decide how to proceed. If a petition is the chosen route, we will prepare filings, coordinate notice, and advocate for a result that aligns with the settlor’s intent while protecting trustee and beneficiary interests.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas