If you live in Twin Lakes and need to change provisions of a previously established trust, a trust modification petition can help adjust terms to reflect current circumstances. This process allows trustees or beneficiaries to request court approval for amendments when a trust cannot be modified by agreement alone or when the change affects third parties. Understanding the legal grounds, documentation required, and likely timelines is important so you can make informed decisions that protect assets and intentions. The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman can assist with preparing petitions and navigating local court procedures in Santa Cruz County, offering clear guidance and steady support throughout the matter.
A trust modification petition is often necessary when beneficiaries disagree, when changes in law affect existing provisions, or when unexpected life events make the original terms impractical. Whether you need to correct drafting errors, clarify ambiguous language, or adapt to changed beneficiaries or asset structures, the petition process provides a formal path to request judicial approval. Our approach focuses on practical resolution, minimizing delay and reducing the strain on family relationships whenever possible. We work with clients to evaluate alternatives, prepare persuasive petitions, and communicate with the court and other parties to reach outcomes that honor the settlor’s intent while addressing present needs and realities.
Filing a trust modification petition can preserve the value and purpose of a trust when circumstances have changed or when unforeseen events make original terms unworkable. Judicial approval can resolve disputes, clear up ambiguity, and allow for necessary administrative changes that beneficiaries or trustees cannot accomplish by informal agreement. Benefits include establishing legally enforceable modifications, preventing future litigation by clarifying responsibilities, and ensuring that the trust continues to serve the settlor’s intended beneficiaries. Thoughtful preparation of the petition and supporting evidence increases the chances of a favorable outcome, promotes stability, and helps trustees meet their fiduciary duties with confidence and transparency.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman serves individuals and families across Santa Cruz County and nearby communities, including Twin Lakes and San Jose. Our practice focuses on estate planning and trust administration matters, with hands-on, practical representation in trust modification petitions, trust disputes, and related probates. Clients appreciate our clear communication, thorough preparation, and commitment to resolving issues efficiently while protecting client interests. We help prepare petitions, compile supporting documentation, liaise with courts and other parties, and pursue solutions that are aligned with each client’s priorities, providing steady guidance through every procedural step.
A trust modification petition asks the court to amend, interpret, or reform a trust when parties cannot complete the change through private agreement or when a formal judicial determination is required. The petition must set out the legal and factual grounds for modification, including the settlor’s intent, the reasons the current trust is inadequate, and any proposed new language. Supporting evidence often includes the original trust document, declarations or affidavits from interested parties, and any documentation of changed circumstances. The court evaluates whether the requested modification aligns with legal standards and the settlor’s intent before approving any change.
Timing and procedural rules can differ depending on the nature of the requested modification and the parties involved. Some petitions are uncontested and move through the system quickly, while contested matters may require hearings, discovery, or mediation. The court will consider the rights of beneficiaries, potential creditors, and other interested parties before making a ruling. Careful drafting of the petition, strategic selection of supporting documents, and clear articulation of why the change is necessary improve the likelihood that the court will find the proposed modification reasonable and consistent with the trust’s original purposes.
A trust modification petition is a legal request filed in probate or superior court seeking to change trust terms, clarify ambiguous provisions, or reform the document to reflect the settlor’s true intent. Courts may grant relief when the trust contains mistakes, when circumstances have changed substantially, or when the settlor’s intent cannot be fulfilled under current language. Typical grounds include mistake, ambiguity, impracticability, or changed tax or beneficiary circumstances. The petition should explain why less formal alternatives are not available and why the requested relief better serves the trust’s purpose while protecting the rights of all interested parties.
Preparing a trust modification petition involves identifying the interested parties, gathering the trust documents, drafting a clear statement of the requested changes, and assembling evidence to support the petition. The process commonly begins with notice to beneficiaries and other interested parties, followed by filing the petition and any supporting declarations. Courts may schedule hearings or encourage settlement discussions. In contested cases, discovery and additional filings may be required. Proper service and adherence to local court rules are essential to avoid delays, and attention to procedural details can significantly affect how quickly and favorably a petition is resolved.
Understanding common terms helps make the petition process less intimidating. Definitions include settlor, trustee, beneficiary, reformation, modification, probate court, and declaration. Each term relates to roles, procedural steps, or types of relief available when seeking to change a trust. A clear grasp of these concepts helps clients follow the process, participate meaningfully in discussions, and make informed choices about settlement or litigation strategies. When questions arise about a specific term or its implications, we provide plain-language explanations and apply definitions to the facts of each case so clients know what to expect at each stage.
The settlor is the person who originally created and funded the trust and who set out the trust’s terms and intent. Understanding the settlor’s expressed wishes and the circumstances at the time the trust was created is central to many modification petitions. Courts carefully examine the settlor’s intent to determine whether proposed changes honor the original purpose of the trust. Evidence of the settlor’s intent may include the trust document itself, related estate planning documents, and testimony or declarations from individuals familiar with the settlor’s objectives and reasons for the original provisions.
Reformation refers to the court-ordered correction of a trust document to reflect the settlor’s actual intent when the written instrument fails to express that intent due to mistake or omission. A petition for reformation must typically demonstrate clear and convincing evidence that the trust as written does not align with the settlor’s true intention. This remedy allows the court to modify language without changing the fundamental purpose of the trust, restoring fidelity to the settlor’s plan while preserving legal certainty for trustees and beneficiaries moving forward.
The trustee is the person or institution tasked with managing trust assets and carrying out the settlor’s directions for the benefit of beneficiaries. Trustees have fiduciary duties to act in beneficiaries’ best interests and to administer the trust according to its terms and applicable law. When a trust requires modification, trustees may file petitions or be named parties in proceedings; they are responsible for cooperating with court orders and for implementing approved changes while maintaining transparent records and communications with beneficiaries about the status of the trust and the reasons for any requested modifications.
A beneficiary is an individual or entity entitled to receive benefits from a trust according to its terms. Beneficiaries have legal interests that courts protect during modification proceedings, especially when proposed changes could affect distributions or rights. Notice requirements ensure that beneficiaries are informed and able to participate or object. Courts evaluate how modifications impact beneficiaries and weigh whether changes align with the settlor’s objectives while being fair and reasonable given the trust’s purposes and the current circumstances surrounding assets and relationships.
When considering changes to a trust, parties may pursue informal agreements among beneficiaries and trustees or proceed with a formal trust modification petition in court. Informal modification can be faster and less costly if all interested parties agree and the modifications do not harm third-party rights. By contrast, a court petition creates a binding judicial determination and is often necessary when disagreements exist, when third-party interests are implicated, or when reformation is sought due to mistake. Evaluating the benefits and risks of each option helps determine the most appropriate route for preserving trust value and honoring the settlor’s intent.
An informal approach can suffice when trustees and all beneficiaries agree on the proposed change and the modification does not prejudice the rights of unknown or absent parties. Agreements reached through written amendment or by restating the trust can avoid court involvement and reduce time and cost. Even when everyone agrees, careful documentation and legal review are advisable to ensure the amendment is valid, enforceable, and consistent with trust formalities. Properly executed modifications protect against future disputes and provide clarity for trustees administering the trust under amended terms.
Limited administrative changes, such as updating trustee contact information, changing bank accounts, or clarifying procedural instructions that do not affect distributions or beneficiary rights, may be handled without court petitions. Trustees typically have authority under the trust to make routine administrative adjustments. Documenting such actions and obtaining beneficiary acknowledgement when possible reduces the chance of later disputes. When uncertainty exists about whether a proposed change is truly administrative, seeking legal guidance before acting helps ensure that trustees stay within the scope of their authority and protect beneficiary interests.
When beneficiaries or trustees cannot reach agreement or when proposed changes impact third-party rights, a court petition provides an authoritative resolution. Litigation-style proceedings may be necessary to clarify ambiguities, correct mistakes, or determine whether changes align with the settlor’s intent. A comprehensive legal approach ensures procedural requirements are met, appropriate notice is provided to interested parties, and persuasive evidence is presented to the court. Courts will weigh the rights of all parties, and careful legal preparation increases the chance of a result that upholds fairness while honoring the trust’s purpose.
Trust modifications that involve complex asset structures, potential tax consequences, or interactions with other estate planning documents often require formal court approval to ensure changes are legally sound and to minimize unintended consequences. Courts can grant relief that accounts for tax planning concerns, creditor issues, or conflicts with beneficiary rights when those matters cannot be resolved informally. A comprehensive legal strategy includes evaluating financial and tax impacts, coordinating with financial professionals as needed, and structuring petitions to address related issues while seeking an outcome consistent with the settlor’s original goals.
A court-approved modification creates a clear, enforceable record of the changes and reduces the likelihood of future disputes. Judicial action provides legal certainty for trustees charged with implementing new terms and offers protections for beneficiaries who might otherwise be disadvantaged by informal changes. Additionally, the court’s involvement helps ensure that third-party claims and creditor issues are appropriately considered, providing a comprehensive resolution that addresses the legal, administrative, and practical consequences of modification. This certainty is especially valuable for trusts that hold significant assets or involve multiple beneficiaries with competing interests.
Formal petitions can also correct drafting mistakes through reformation, allowing the trust to reflect the settlor’s true intent without upending the trust’s overall purpose. Courts can fashion remedies tailored to the specific facts, such as clarifying ambiguous provisions or approving narrowly tailored changes that preserve the settlor’s goals. By documenting the reasons for the change and receiving judicial approval, trustees and beneficiaries gain confidence that the modification will withstand future challenges, enabling smoother administration and greater predictability for estate planning outcomes over time.
When a court approves a modification, the resulting order provides a definitive ruling that clarifies parties rights and obligations under the trust. This protection reduces the risk of subsequent litigation and gives trustees clear authority to carry out the modified terms. Beneficiaries receive assurances that their interests have been considered and that the changes conform to legal standards. The court process also creates a public and enforceable record of the modification, which can be essential when dealing with financial institutions, title companies, or other entities that require evidence of authority before acting on trust instructions.
Courts can reform or interpret trust language to correct unintended mistakes while leaving intact the overall structure and purpose of the trust, preserving the settlor’s original plan. This remedy allows the trust to function as the settlor intended, reducing administration difficulties and protecting beneficiaries from outcomes not contemplated by the settlor. Judicial reform is particularly valuable when ambiguities or drafting errors would otherwise frustrate the trust’s objectives, because the court can tailor relief narrowly to address defects without wholesale alteration of the trust’s core provisions.
Before starting a petition, gather the original trust, any amendments, related wills, powers of attorney, and records of asset funding. Organize correspondence, financial statements, and any documents that shed light on the settlor’s intent or the circumstances that led to the requested change. Clear documentation strengthens the petition and supports factual assertions, which is especially important if the court requires evidence for reformation or modification. Well-organized materials also streamline communication with other parties and help reduce the time needed to prepare declarations and exhibits.
Courts have specific filing requirements, notice rules, and timelines that must be followed precisely to avoid delays or dismissed petitions. Familiarity with Santa Cruz County procedures, local forms, and preferred filing practices helps keep the process moving efficiently. Attention to procedural details, such as proper service on all interested parties and submission of required declarations and exhibits, reduces the risk of avoidable setbacks. Preparing a complete and well-organized petition demonstrates respect for the process and helps the court address the matter on its merits more quickly.
People consider trust modification petitions for a variety of reasons, including correcting drafting errors, addressing changed family circumstances, clarifying ambiguous terms, or resolving disputes among beneficiaries or trustees. When the trust as written cannot be administered as intended or when unforeseen events render certain provisions impractical, a petition offers a formal path to obtain judicial approval for reasonable adjustments. The process helps preserve the settlor’s intent while ensuring fair treatment of beneficiaries, and it can prevent piecemeal disputes by creating a single, enforceable court ruling.
Other common reasons include addressing tax implications that were not foreseeable at the time the trust was created, removing or replacing trustees who can no longer serve, revising provisions to provide for new dependents, or correcting ambiguous language that leads to conflicting interpretations. In many cases, proactive action through a petition prevents future disagreements and streamlines trust administration. Understanding the available options, potential outcomes, and likely timelines helps individuals choose an approach that balances cost, speed, and the need for clear, durable results.
Situations that commonly lead to petitions include beneficiaries contesting terms, discovery of drafting errors, changed family dynamics such as divorce or death, the need to add or remove assets, and new tax law interpretations that make original provisions impractical. Trusts drafted many years earlier may not reflect current relationships or financial structures, and courts can be asked to reform or modify provisions to align with the settlor’s intent. Each circumstance requires a tailored approach that balances legal considerations with the goals of the settlor and the interests of beneficiaries.
When language in a trust fails to express the settlor’s intention or contains drafting mistakes, a petition for reformation or clarification may be necessary. The court examines evidence such as contemporaneous documents, drafts, and testimony to determine whether the trust should be corrected. Correcting such errors helps trustees administer the trust as intended and reduces the risk of disputes among beneficiaries. Careful documentation and supporting declarations improve the odds that a court will approve a narrowly tailored correction to the trust instrument.
Significant life changes, such as remarriage, divorce, births, deaths, or substantial changes in asset composition, can make original trust provisions impractical or inconsistent with current intentions. Courts may approve modifications that reasonably adapt the trust to new circumstances while preserving the settlor’s overall purpose. Petitioning for change allows trustees and beneficiaries to adjust distributions, trustee powers, or administrative provisions in ways that reflect present realities and support smoother trust administration going forward.
Conflicts between trustees and beneficiaries or among beneficiaries themselves often lead to petitions seeking judicial clarification or modification to resolve disagreements. The court provides a neutral forum to weigh competing interpretations and to issue an enforceable order that clarifies rights and duties. Resolving disputes through the court process, though sometimes more time-consuming, can prevent ongoing conflicts, create a clear path for trust administration, and protect parties from unilateral actions that could jeopardize the trust’s purposes.
Residents of Twin Lakes and Santa Cruz County have access to local representation that understands regional court practices and community considerations. The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provides services tailored to trust modification and related estate planning needs, offering guidance on available options, procedural requirements, and likely outcomes. We focus on clear communication and practical strategies that reflect local rules and timelines, helping clients make sound decisions about petitions, alternative dispute resolution, or trust administration steps while remaining sensitive to family dynamics and long-term legacy goals.
Clients choose our firm for thoughtful, client-focused representation in trust modification matters and other aspects of estate planning. We work closely with trustees and beneficiaries to evaluate options, prepare persuasive petitions, and pursue solutions that minimize conflict while protecting legal rights. Our approach emphasizes practical outcomes, timely communication, and careful preparation so that petitions are presented clearly and efficiently. We assist with gathering evidence, preparing declarations, and navigating local court procedures to help clients achieve durable and enforceable results.
We place a high value on listening to clients, understanding their priorities, and tailoring strategies that reflect each family’s needs. Whether the matter can be resolved through negotiation or requires court intervention, our goal is to reduce uncertainty and help clients move forward with confidence. We coordinate with financial advisors and other professionals when needed to address tax or asset issues related to modifications. Clear explanations about possible outcomes help clients weigh the costs and benefits of different courses of action.
Throughout the process, we strive to protect client interests while seeking solutions that are fair and legally sound. We prepare petitions and documentation with attention to detail and follow local court rules to avoid unnecessary delays. Our team keeps clients informed at every stage, explains procedural steps, and answers questions about timing and potential consequences. This collaborative approach supports efficient resolution and helps trustees and beneficiaries make decisions aligned with the settlor’s intent and the long-term administration of the trust.
Our process begins with a careful review of the trust and related documents to assess whether a petition is appropriate and what relief to seek. We gather evidence, prepare declarations, and develop a petition that explains the legal and factual basis for modification. We also identify interested parties and ensure proper service in compliance with Santa Cruz County court rules. When possible, we pursue negotiated resolutions and use court proceedings when necessary to obtain a binding order that clarifies or reforms the trust to reflect the settlor’s intent and current circumstances.
The first step involves reviewing the trust document, any amendments, and related estate planning instruments, as well as discussing the client’s objectives and the relevant facts. We identify potential grounds for modification, list interested parties, and determine the evidence needed to support the petition. This planning stage includes evaluating less adversarial alternatives and considering the likely timeline and costs associated with court action. Clear planning at the outset helps shape a petition that accurately reflects the desired relief and anticipates likely objections.
We examine the trust, prior drafts, correspondence, and financial records that shed light on the settlor’s intent and the reasons for the proposed modification. Gathering declarations from witnesses, account statements, and expert reports when appropriate strengthens the petition. Organizing exhibits and constructing a factual narrative that aligns with legal standards are essential to persuading the court to grant the requested relief. Thorough preparation at this stage reduces the chance of surprises during later proceedings.
Accurate identification of beneficiaries, trustees, and other interested parties is critical to satisfying notice requirements and avoiding procedural defects. We prepare the necessary service documents and coordinate timely notice in accordance with local rules. Ensuring proper notification helps avoid delays and ensures that all parties have an opportunity to participate or object. Addressing notice issues early allows the court to consider the petition on its merits without concern about technical deficiencies in service.
Once the petition and supporting declarations are ready, we file the petition with the probate or superior court and ensure that statutory notice requirements are met. Filing includes submitting any required local forms and proposed orders. After filing, we serve the petition on identified interested parties and handle responses or objections. If issues can be resolved by agreement, we pursue settlement and submit stipulations to the court. If disputes arise, we prepare for hearings and any necessary interim relief to protect assets and administration during the pendency of the matter.
When objections are raised, we evaluate their legal basis and engage in discussions or mediation where appropriate to seek resolution without prolonged litigation. We analyze objections for procedural or substantive merit and respond with additional declarations or legal argument as needed. Negotiated agreements that can be put before the court for approval often reduce time and expense while achieving acceptable outcomes for all parties. Where settlement is not possible, we prepare to litigate the contested issues with a focus on clear presentation of evidence and legal reasoning.
If temporary orders are needed to protect trust assets or administration during litigation, we seek appropriate interim relief from the court. We prepare hearing materials, declarations, and proposed orders to present the case clearly and efficiently. Preparing witnesses and exhibits in advance helps the court understand the issues and the basis for the requested relief. Thoughtful preparation for hearings increases the chance of favorable rulings on interim and final matters while keeping the focus on resolving the central legal questions.
After hearings or negotiated resolutions, the court issues an order granting or denying the petition or approving stipulated modifications. If the court approves changes, we assist in implementing the order, updating trust records, and advising trustees on compliance. We also ensure that institutions holding trust assets receive necessary documentation, such as certified copies of orders, to effect changes. Follow-up may include revising related estate planning documents, coordinating with financial professionals, and addressing any further administrative steps to complete the trust modification process.
Once a court order is obtained, trustees must implement the changes and update records to reflect the modified provisions. We help prepare documentation for banks, title companies, and other institutions that require proof of authority or revised instructions. Proper implementation ensures the trust operates under the new terms without confusion or delay. We also advise trustees on recordkeeping and accounting steps to demonstrate compliance with the court order and to support future administration of the trust in accordance with the modified terms.
After implementation, we confirm that all administrative tasks are complete and advise trustees and beneficiaries on the long-term implications of the modification. This may include reviewing distribution schedules, tax considerations, and any additional document updates needed to align the entire estate plan. Closing the matter with thorough documentation and clear guidance helps prevent subsequent disputes and supports efficient administration moving forward. We remain available to assist with any post-order questions or with further amendments as circumstances evolve.
A trust modification petition is a formal court request to amend, reform, or clarify terms of a trust when informal agreement is not possible or when a judicial determination is required. It is necessary in circumstances such as unresolved beneficiary disputes, mistakes in drafting that prevent the settlor’s intent from being carried out, or when changed circumstances render original terms impractical. The petition outlines the factual and legal basis for the requested relief and asks the court to issue an order reflecting the appropriate modification. Preparing a petition requires careful documentation, including the original trust, any amendments, and supporting declarations that explain the reasons for the change. The court will consider whether the requested relief aligns with the settlor’s intentions and protects the rights of beneficiaries and creditors. Because procedural rules and notice requirements apply, accurate preparation and timely service to interested parties are essential to avoid delays and to present the petition on its merits.
The duration of a trust modification petition varies depending on whether the matter is contested, the court’s calendar, and whether interim relief or additional discovery is required. Uncontested petitions that address back-office or administrative issues can sometimes move relatively quickly, while contested matters involving hearings, discovery, or mediation can take several months or longer to resolve. Local court practices and the complexity of the factual record also influence timing. Early planning, clear documentation, and efforts to resolve disputes through negotiation or mediation can shorten the timeline. If court hearings are needed, scheduling depends on the court’s availability and whether temporary orders are requested. Clients should expect updates on timelines during the planning stage so they can balance time considerations with the importance of achieving a thorough and enforceable modification.
Notice must be provided to all interested parties, which typically includes beneficiaries, trustees, and anyone with a potential legal interest in the trust. Proper service ensures parties have an opportunity to respond or object, and it protects the court’s jurisdiction over the matter. Requirements can vary based on the scope of the requested relief and the identities of parties who might be affected by the modification. Identifying and locating interested parties is part of the preparation process, and failure to serve proper notice can result in delays or dismissal. The petition process includes steps to document how notice was given, and the court will consider any objections that arise from notified parties when deciding whether to grant the modification.
If beneficiaries disagree, an informal modification is generally not feasible because unanimous consent is often required to change trust terms outside court. When agreement cannot be reached, a trust modification petition provides a formal avenue for resolving disputes, allowing the court to interpret, reform, or amend terms as justified by the evidence. The court’s decision creates a binding resolution that sets clear duties for trustees and rights for beneficiaries. Parties may choose mediation or settlement discussions as an alternative to litigation, and many conflicts are resolved through negotiated agreements that are later submitted to the court for approval. When settlement is possible, it can save time and cost, but when serious disagreements remain, the petition route ensures disputes are addressed in a legally enforceable way.
Evidence to support a reformation petition typically includes the original trust document, drafts, correspondence or notes that show the settlor’s intent, and declarations from witnesses familiar with the settlor’s wishes. The court generally looks for persuasive evidence that the written instrument does not reflect the settlor’s actual intent because of a mistake or omission. Documentary evidence that aligns with testimony or contemporaneous records strengthens the case for reformation. Affidavits from persons who assisted with drafting or who discussed the settlor’s intentions can be especially helpful. Courts evaluate the totality of evidence to determine whether reformation is appropriate, considering whether the requested correction faithfully restores what the settlor intended without creating unfairness to interested parties.
Modifying a trust can have implications for taxes and for creditor claims depending on the nature of the change and the timing of the petition. For example, alterations that affect ownership of assets or change distribution timing could have tax consequences or affect how creditors can reach assets. Part of petition planning should include consideration of tax and creditor issues and coordination with financial advisors when necessary to identify and mitigate potential consequences. Courts also consider creditor rights and public policy when evaluating petitions, and notice requirements ensure that creditors and affected parties have an opportunity to assert claims. Addressing these concerns proactively helps structure modifications that achieve the client’s goals while minimizing unexpected financial or legal impact.
A trustee may file a petition to modify a trust when circumstances prevent proper administration or when a court determination is needed to carry out the settlor’s intent. Trustees have fiduciary duties to act in the best interests of beneficiaries and to avoid making unilateral changes that exceed their authority. When seeking modification, trustees must provide full and accurate information to the court and to interested parties and must comply with notice and procedural requirements. Trustees should carefully document the reasons for requesting modification and pursue remedies that protect beneficiaries and preserve trust purposes. Acting transparently and seeking court approval when necessary helps trustees fulfill their duties while ensuring that any changes are legally authorized and enforceable.
Common defenses to a petition may include arguments that the settlor’s intent is clear as written, that no mistake occurred, or that the proposed change would unfairly prejudice beneficiaries or violate public policy. Opponents may also challenge procedural aspects, such as improper notice or lack of standing by the petitioner. Courts consider both substantive and procedural defenses when evaluating a petition for modification or reformation. To meet these challenges, petitioners must present convincing evidence and comply with procedural rules. Thorough preparation that anticipates common defenses and addresses them with documentation and legal argument increases the petition’s prospects for success and helps the court resolve the matter on its merits.
Costs for filing a trust modification petition vary based on complexity, local filing fees, and whether the matter is contested. Uncontested petitions generally cost less than contested proceedings, which may involve discovery, multiple hearings, and greater attorney involvement. Alternatives to reduce costs include negotiation, mediation, or seeking stipulations among parties to streamline court submissions and limit litigation time. Early case assessment and a focus on resolving narrow issues can also help control costs. If parties are willing to compromise on certain points, the overall expense is often lower than prolonged litigation. Discussing budget and strategy at the outset helps set realistic expectations and prioritize the most important objectives for the petition.
If you believe a trust requires modification, start by locating the trust documents and any related estate planning instruments, and prepare a summary of the circumstances prompting the change. Collecting supporting documents such as correspondence, financial records, and any drafts or notes that illustrate the settlor’s intent is helpful. Early organization makes the evaluation process more efficient and strengthens any subsequent petition. Next, consult with counsel to review options including informal amendment, mediation, or filing a petition. A legal review helps identify the appropriate remedy, potential obstacles, and likely procedural steps. Early guidance also helps identify parties who must be notified and whether temporary or interim relief should be pursued to protect trust assets during the process.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas