If you are handling the aftermath of a loved one’s passing and a trust is involved, a Heggstad Petition may be needed to transfer assets properly into trust. In Santa Cruz County, families frequently face paperwork, probate risk, and disputes over whether assets were properly assigned to a trust before death. This page explains what a Heggstad Petition is, why it matters for estate planning, and how the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman can assist clients in Watsonville with matters involving pour-over wills, deeds, trust coding, and related filings to ensure assets are administered according to the decedent’s intent.
A Heggstad Petition can resolve situations where property that should have been held by a revocable living trust remains titled in the decedent’s name at death. Because California law allows courts to recognize that certain assets were intended to belong to a trust, the petition process helps avoid lengthy probate when appropriate evidence exists. On this page we outline typical steps, documentation, and factors the court considers, as well as practical decisions families should make when determining whether to pursue a petition in Watsonville, including how a pour-over will, trust certification, and assignment documentation may support a successful outcome.
Filing a Heggstad Petition can preserve the deceased person’s estate plan by confirming that certain assets were intended to be trust property even if title was not updated. This procedure often reduces the need for formal probate administration, can accelerate distribution to beneficiaries, and can limit costs and delays commonly associated with intestate succession or estate litigation. For families in Watsonville, pursuing the petition may protect privacy and minimize court involvement by allowing a judge to declare that assets pass under the terms of the revocable living trust or pour-over will, provided evidence demonstrates the deceased’s intent to fund the trust before death.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provide practical guidance for clients throughout Santa Cruz County on trust administration matters, including Heggstad Petitions, trust amendments, and related filings. Our approach focuses on timely, empathetic support for families navigating post-death asset transfers, document assembly, and court filings. We work to identify and gather relevant trust documents, deeds, assignment records, and declarations that demonstrate the decedent’s intent. By communicating clearly with beneficiaries and the court, we aim to achieve efficient resolutions that align with the client’s estate plan and help avoid unnecessary expense or delay in distributing trust assets.
A Heggstad Petition asks a probate court to recognize that certain property should be treated as trust property despite being titled in the decedent’s name at the time of death. This petition is often used alongside or instead of probate in cases where evidence—such as a trust document, transfer instruments, or declarations—shows the decedent intended to place the asset into their revocable living trust. In Watsonville, the petition can be an effective tool to transfer real estate, bank accounts, or other assets into a trust for administration or distribution according to the trust’s terms, while avoiding the full probate process when the court is persuaded by the facts presented.
When preparing a Heggstad Petition, it is important to assemble a record that supports the claim the deceased intended the asset to be trust property. Typical supporting items include a signed trust, assignments of assets to the trust, declarations from the decedent or witnesses, and related estate planning documents such as pour-over wills, HIPAA authorizations, or powers of attorney created during the decedent’s life. Courts review the totality of the evidence to determine the decedent’s intent and whether a transfer by means of a Heggstad Petition is consistent with California trust and probate law, as applied in Santa Cruz County and Watsonville specifically.
A Heggstad Petition is a specific type of petition filed in probate court requesting an order that certain property is part of a trust despite being titled otherwise at death. The name comes from case law that established the standards courts use when evaluating whether a decedent intended to transfer assets into a trust. The petition presents facts and supporting documents demonstrating intent, and asks the court to issue an order transferring the asset to the trustee or allowing the trustee to administer the asset according to the trust terms. This process helps implement the decedent’s wishes while minimizing formal probate administration when appropriate.
Preparing a Heggstad Petition typically involves collecting the trust instrument, any deeds, bank statements, transfer documents, written declarations, and witness statements that show the decedent intended the property to be trust property. The petition must be drafted to explain the factual basis for the claim, identify the property at issue, and request specific relief from the court. Notice to interested persons and beneficiaries is required under California procedure, and hearings may be scheduled to allow objections. If the court finds the evidence persuasive, it will enter an order declaring the property belongs to the trust and directing the appropriate transfer or administration.
Understanding common terms used in Heggstad Petition matters helps families and trustees navigate the process with greater confidence. Below are short definitions of frequently encountered phrases such as trust, trustee, transfer, pour-over will, and petition. Familiarity with these terms clarifies what documents will support a petition and what outcomes a court may order. Clear communication about these elements also assists in gathering the necessary evidence in Watsonville and throughout Santa Cruz County, reducing confusion and improving the efficiency of filings and court proceedings.
A revocable living trust is an estate planning instrument created during the grantor’s life that holds title to assets and allows for management and distribution according to the trust terms. The grantor typically serves as trustee while alive and can make changes or revoke the trust. If property was intended to be held in the trust but remained in the decedent’s name, a Heggstad Petition can help the court recognize the trust’s ownership and allow the trustee to administer the asset under the trust terms after death.
A pour-over will operates with a trust by directing any assets not already titled in the trust at death to be transferred into the trust’s administration. While a pour-over will can funnel residual assets into a trust, assets titled solely in the decedent’s name may still require court action to be effectively transferred. A Heggstad Petition can be used to show that certain property should be treated as trust property despite title issues, complementing the role of a pour-over will in implementing the estate plan.
A trust certification is a redacted summary of the trust that provides proof of the trust’s existence and the trustee’s authority without revealing confidential details. Courts, financial institutions, and third parties often accept a trust certification to verify a trustee’s ability to act. When pursuing a Heggstad Petition, a trust certification may be used alongside the full trust document and other evidence to support the trustee’s claim that the property belongs to the trust and should be administered under its terms.
An assignment of assets to trust is a document that transfers ownership of specific property to the trust. Assignments can apply to personal property, bank accounts, or other assets and serve as direct evidence that the grantor intended those assets to be held by the trust. Where assignments are missing or incomplete, a Heggstad Petition can be used to show the decedent’s intent and secure a court order treating the asset as trust property, permitting distribution under the trust rather than through probate.
When property is titled in the decedent’s name, families must choose between proceedings such as formal probate, summary probate procedures, or a Heggstad Petition to place assets into a trust. Formal probate is often slower and more expensive, while a successful Heggstad Petition can allow assets to be administered through the trust, preserving privacy and reducing time and expense. In Watsonville, the appropriate route depends on the asset value, presence of clear documentation demonstrating intent to fund a trust, and whether there are disputes among beneficiaries that might complicate a petition or require broader probate oversight.
A limited approach, such as filing a Heggstad Petition, is often appropriate when the decedent left clear documentary evidence showing intent to place specific property into a trust. This evidence can include a signed trust agreement, deeds prepared to transfer real estate to the trust, bank transfer instructions, or written declarations by the decedent. When such documentation demonstrates the decedent’s consistent plan to fund the trust, a court may accept the petition and order transfer to the trustee, avoiding full probate and streamlining distribution in accordance with the trust terms.
A Heggstad Petition is particularly useful when the assets at issue are limited in number or value and the facts supporting trust ownership are straightforward. In those situations, the petition can provide a narrow, efficient remedy to move specified assets into the trust without initiating a broad probate administration. By focusing on discrete property and clear supporting evidence, families in Watsonville can often resolve ownership questions quickly, minimize court involvement, and allow the trustee to carry out distributions under the trust terms for the benefit of named beneficiaries.
A comprehensive approach is recommended when estate matters involve complex holdings, contested beneficiary relationships, unclear documentation, or potential creditor claims that could affect asset distribution. If multiple parties dispute whether assets belong to the trust, if there are missing or contradictory documents, or if estate debts are significant, a full probate administration or more detailed court proceedings may be necessary to resolve competing claims. In such cases, broader legal support helps manage litigation risk, coordinate creditor notices, and achieve outcomes that comply with California probate rules and trust law.
When an estate includes varied asset classes—real property, retirement accounts, life insurance, and business interests—or multiple interrelated documents such as irrevocable life insurance trusts, retirement plan trusts, and special needs trusts, a comprehensive review is important. Ensuring each asset is handled according to beneficiary designations, trust terms, and tax considerations may require broader administration or court involvement. Proper coordination can prevent errors that lead to delays or unintended distributions, and it helps align actions taken with the decedent’s overall estate planning goals in Watsonville and throughout Santa Cruz County.
A comprehensive approach to resolving trust and estate matters offers several advantages, including greater certainty about asset ownership, protection against competing claims, and a holistic review of related documents such as pour-over wills, HIPAA authorizations, and powers of attorney. Taking a broad view helps identify necessary filings like trust modification petitions or Heggstad Petitions where appropriate, ensures creditor and beneficiary notices are managed correctly, and reduces the likelihood of costly oversights. This approach can help families move more confidently through post-death administration while preserving the decedent’s intent.
Beyond legal clarity, a comprehensive strategy supports practical estate administration by ensuring that trustees and beneficiaries understand timelines, potential tax implications, and the documents needed to access financial accounts or transfer real property. Coordinated action can shorten delays in distributing assets, protect privacy, and help trustees perform duties effectively. For complex estates in Watsonville, this integrated perspective increases the chances of a smooth transfer of assets into the trust and reduces the risk of future litigation or claims that could unsettle beneficiaries and prolong administration.
A comprehensive approach helps ensure that the legal basis for asset transfers is well-documented and defensible, which in turn reduces the risk of challenges from heirs or creditors. By assembling a clear record—trust instruments, assignments, declarations, and related documents—and pursuing appropriate petitions or filings, trustees can show a court the factual basis for treating assets as trust property. This increased clarity often deters disputes and supports timely distribution according to the decedent’s plan, promoting stability for beneficiaries and reducing the emotional stress associated with contested matters.
When asset ownership is clarified through careful documentation and the right petitions, trustees can avoid delays associated with full probate administration and focus on timely distribution and asset management. Streamlined processes save time and money by limiting court hearings and reducing administrative burdens on families. In Watsonville, where beneficiaries often wish to minimize disruption after a loss, a thorough but efficient approach to trust administration and related filings supports a quicker resolution that aligns with the decedent’s wishes and reduces ongoing uncertainty for those involved.
Begin by collecting all trust-related documents, deeds, bank statements, assignment forms, and any correspondence that shows the decedent intended assets to be held by the trust. Documentation may include signed trust instruments, transfers prepared prior to death, written declarations, or statements from witnesses who can attest to the decedent’s intent. Having a complete file before filing a petition makes it far easier to prepare pleadings and respond to court inquiries. Early organization also helps identify whether additional petitions or filings, such as trust certification or pour-over will filings, will be needed alongside a Heggstad Petition.
Consider possible objections from heirs or creditors and assemble supporting evidence in advance to counter expected challenges. This may include witness declarations, affidavits, copies of correspondence, or records showing consistent behavior by the decedent in managing assets for the trust. Preparing thorough legal arguments and factual support helps the court evaluate the petition efficiently and reduces surprises at hearings. Being proactive about likely issues can improve the chances of a favorable outcome and avoid protracted litigation that undermines the goal of swift trust administration.
Consider a Heggstad Petition when assets that should be in a revocable living trust remain titled in the decedent’s name at death, particularly if you want to avoid full probate administration. If the trust exists and supporting documentation or declarations demonstrate that the decedent intended the assets to be trust property, the petition offers a streamlined judicial path to transfer those assets for administration under the trust. Families in Watsonville may find this approach preferable when the property involved is limited in scope, when privacy is a concern, or when distributing assets quickly to beneficiaries is a priority.
You should also weigh a petition when there is a risk of competing claims from heirs or when title was never updated despite clear evidence the decedent meant to fund the trust. A Heggstad Petition can clarify ownership for banks, title companies, and successors, enabling trustees to access accounts or transfer real property without prolonged probate. Discussing the facts with counsel early helps determine whether the petition is the most cost-effective route or if broader probate administration may better address creditor, tax, or contested beneficiary issues in your particular situation.
Typical circumstances prompting a Heggstad Petition include recently transferred assets that remain titled in the deceased’s name, deeds that were prepared but not recorded, bank accounts not retitled to the trust, and unclear beneficiary designations that conflict with trust terms. Other scenarios include when a decedent made oral declarations or informal written notes indicating intent to transfer assets to the trust but failed to complete formal assignment documents. In all such cases, a petition can provide the court with the evidence it needs to recognize trust ownership and allow the trustee to proceed with administration.
When real estate was intended to be held by a trust but the deed was not recorded or transferred before death, a Heggstad Petition can ask the court to declare the property belongs to the trust. Supporting evidence might include a drafted but unrecorded deed, communications instructing transfer to the trust, or the trust instrument that names the property. If the court accepts the petition, it can direct the county recorder to effectuate transfer or otherwise recognize the trustee’s authority to manage or sell the property under the trust terms, facilitating distribution to beneficiaries.
Bank or brokerage accounts intended for trust funding but still held in the decedent’s personal name often trigger the need for a Heggstad Petition. Evidence such as account change forms, letters to the financial institution, or consistent statements indicating the grantor’s plan to fund the trust helps support a petition. Once a court declares the account trust property, the trustee can access funds to pay obligations and distribute assets as provided by the trust, avoiding the longer timeline and higher expense that often accompany formal probate administration for financial accounts.
Personal property, intellectual property, or other intangible assets may lack formal assignment records yet still have been intended for the trust. When documentation is informal or incomplete, a Heggstad Petition can present witness statements, contemporaneous notes, and trust provisions to demonstrate intent to fund the trust. Establishing ownership through the court allows trustees to handle these assets according to the trust, preserving intended distributions and preventing disputes over personal items or less tangible holdings that are nonetheless valuable to beneficiaries.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman are available to assist Watsonville residents with Heggstad Petitions, trust administration, and related estate planning matters. We guide clients through evidence collection, preparation of pleadings, required notices to interested parties, and court hearings in Santa Cruz County. By explaining procedural steps and anticipated timelines, we help trustees and families make informed decisions about whether a petition or another route best accomplishes the decedent’s estate planning goals. Our focus is on clear communication, careful document assembly, and respectful handling of sensitive family matters during the administration process.
Selecting counsel for a Heggstad Petition means choosing someone who will thoroughly prepare the petition, gather supporting documents, and present a clear, persuasive record to the court. Our practice emphasizes practical solutions tailored to the circumstances of each estate, whether the matter involves real property, bank accounts, or other assets. We coordinate with trustees and beneficiaries to develop a plan that prioritizes efficient administration, compliance with California procedures, and communication that reduces uncertainty for family members facing the emotional challenges of estate settlement.
We assist clients in Watsonville with assembling trust instruments, deeds, assignments, and witness declarations needed to support a petition, and we prepare the necessary notices and court filings required under Santa Cruz County rules. From initial assessment through hearing, we aim to minimize delays by anticipating documentary needs and addressing potential objections proactively. Our approach is to provide straightforward legal guidance, tailored recommendations, and careful preparation so trustees can focus on their duties and beneficiaries can receive distributions as intended by the decedent.
Throughout the process, we keep clients informed about the procedural timeline, likely outcomes, and alternative options if the petition is contested or additional filings are advisable. Whether the goal is to avoid full probate, secure routine transfers into a trust, or resolve complex asset-title questions, we help clients evaluate the best path forward. Our services for Watsonville residents include drafting petitions, presenting evidence at hearings, coordinating with title companies and financial institutions, and advising trustees on post-order steps to complete transfers and distributions.
Our firm follows a structured process for Heggstad Petitions that begins with a thorough review of the trust and related documents, identification of the assets at issue, and an assessment of the evidence required to show the decedent’s intent. We prepare the petition and notices, file with the Santa Cruz County probate court, and manage responses from interested parties. If a hearing is needed we present a clear factual narrative supported by documents and witness statements. After a court order, we assist with any ministerial transfers, title updates, or coordination with financial institutions to complete administration.
The initial phase focuses on gathering the trust, deeds, account records, assignment forms, and any other materials that demonstrate the decedent’s intent to fund the trust. We also obtain beneficiary information and review any potential conflicts or creditor claims that may affect the case. This assessment determines whether a Heggstad Petition is the appropriate remedy or if another route, such as probate or trust modification, better addresses the estate’s needs. Clear documentation from the outset reduces surprises later in the process.
We request copies of the trust instrument, pour-over will, deeds, assignments, and any communications or forms directed to financial institutions. These materials are reviewed for signatures, dates, and language indicating the grantor’s intent to transfer assets to the trust. We also look for contemporaneous evidence such as emails, letters, or notes that corroborate the decedent’s planning and provide the factual basis for the petition. Careful document review helps shape the drafting strategy for a persuasive petition.
We compile a list of beneficiaries, heirs, creditors, and other interested persons who must be notified under California probate procedures. Identifying these parties early allows us to plan for required service, anticipate potential objections, and address creditor timelines. We evaluate whether additional filings, such as notices or petitions related to trust modification or creditor claims, may be necessary. This preparation reduces the risk of procedural delay and supports a smoother path through the probate court when seeking an order recognizing trust property.
After assembling the necessary evidence, we draft a Heggstad Petition tailored to the assets and facts of the case. The petition describes the property at issue, explains the factual basis for treating it as trust property, and attaches supporting documents such as deeds, trust excerpts, and declarations. We file the petition with the Santa Cruz County probate court and serve the required notices to interested parties. Careful drafting anticipates likely questions and presents the court with a clear narrative supported by documentary proof.
Supporting declarations and exhibits are critical to a successful petition, and we prepare these with attention to detail. Witness declarations, copies of assignments, trust excerpts, and account histories are organized and described in the petition. Exhibits are labeled and cited so the court can easily verify the facts. Thorough supporting materials reduce the need for follow-up and improve clarity for the judge reviewing the petition in Santa Cruz County, helping move the matter toward a timely resolution.
Once the petition and exhibits are assembled, we file the documents with the probate court and ensure all required parties receive proper notice within the timelines California law prescribes. Proof of service is prepared and filed to document that interested persons were informed. Proper service and compliance with procedural rules are essential to prevent challenges based on notice defects and to allow the court to proceed with hearing and resolution of the petition.
After filing, the court may set a hearing where interested parties can raise objections and the petitioner presents the factual and documentary basis for the requested order. If the court finds the evidence persuasive, it will enter an order declaring the property trust property and directing appropriate transfers or trustee authority. Following an order, we assist with ministerial tasks such as updating title, presenting the order to financial institutions, and completing any recording or administrative steps necessary to implement the court’s decision and enable the trustee to administer or distribute the asset under the trust terms.
At the hearing, we present a concise factual narrative supported by declarations and documentary exhibits that demonstrate the decedent’s intent to transfer the asset to the trust. We address any objections raised by interested parties and explain how the evidence satisfies legal standards for recognition of trust property. Clear presentation helps the court understand the facts and the requested relief, and it increases the likelihood of a focused ruling that enables efficient transfer or administration under the trust.
Once the court issues an order recognizing the asset as trust property, we guide the trustee through the remaining administrative steps such as recording deeds, presenting orders to banks or title companies, and updating asset records. These ministerial tasks finalize the transfer and allow the trustee to manage or distribute the assets per the trust terms. Proper implementation ensures that the intent recognized by the court is carried out and that beneficiaries receive distributions without unnecessary further delay or administrative obstacles.
A Heggstad Petition is a legal request filed in probate court asking the judge to declare that certain property belonged to a decedent’s trust even though the title remained in the decedent’s name at death. The petition presents documents and declarations that show the decedent intended the asset to be held by the trust, allowing the trustee to manage or distribute it under the trust terms. The procedure is commonly used to avoid the more time-consuming and costly process of formal probate when the evidence supports treating the property as trust property. This petition is used when a trust exists but assets were not formally retitled before death, such as unrecorded deeds or financial accounts still in the decedent’s name. If the court is convinced by the documentary record and witness statements, it can issue an order recognizing the property as part of the trust and directing appropriate transfer or administration. The result can streamline distribution and preserve the decedent’s estate plan without full probate.
A Heggstad Petition seeks a declaration that particular assets belong to a trust, while formal probate is a broader court administration process for settling an estate when assets lack clear passing mechanisms. Probate typically involves appointing a personal representative, inventorying assets, paying debts, and distributing property under a will or intestacy rules. The Heggstad Petition is narrower in scope and aims to move specific assets into trust administration when evidence supports that outcome, thereby avoiding full probate in many cases. Choosing between a petition and probate depends on the estate’s complexity, the clarity of documentation, and any disputes among heirs. For straightforward situations with clear proof the decedent intended the trust to own the asset, a petition can be faster and less expensive. When documentation is lacking, disputes are likely, or creditor issues are significant, probate or additional court proceedings may be more appropriate to resolve all outstanding matters comprehensively.
The most helpful evidence for a Heggstad Petition includes the trust document, deeds, assignment forms, bank records showing attempts to retitle accounts, and written or recorded instructions by the decedent indicating intent to fund the trust. Witness declarations from individuals who observed the decedent’s actions or heard statements evidencing intent can strengthen the petition, as can contemporaneous emails, letters, or notes referencing the plan to transfer assets to the trust. Clear and consistent documentary evidence reduces the likelihood of contested hearings and supports a prompt ruling. Financial statements, signed but unrecorded transfer documents, or correspondence with institutions about transferring assets into the trust are particularly persuasive because they show concrete steps taken toward funding the trust and demonstrate the decedent’s intent.
Timing for a Heggstad Petition varies by case complexity, court schedules, and whether interested parties object. In straightforward matters with ample documentation and no objections, the process can move relatively quickly, sometimes resolving in a matter of weeks to a few months depending on the Santa Cruz County probate court’s calendar. If the petition requires a hearing and notice periods are observed without challenge, the timeline remains reasonably short compared with full probate administration. If objections arise or additional discovery is needed, the process may extend to several months or longer. Preparing a thorough petition, serving notice correctly, and addressing foreseeable objections early helps reduce delays. Consulting with counsel about local court practices in Watsonville and Santa Cruz County can provide a more accurate estimate for a given case.
Yes. California procedure requires notice to interested persons and beneficiaries when filing a Heggstad Petition so they have an opportunity to object. Notices typically include information about the petition, the property at issue, and the deadlines or hearing dates. Proper service of notice is essential because failure to notify required parties can lead to procedural challenges and delay the court’s ability to enter an effective order transferring the asset to the trust. Providing clear and timely notices also encourages open communication among beneficiaries and can reduce the likelihood of disputes. When people understand the basis for a petition and the evidence presented, many potential issues are resolved informally before hearings, which supports a smoother court process and more efficient administration under the trust.
A Heggstad Petition can be contested by interested persons who disagree that the asset should be treated as trust property. Contests often raise questions about the decedent’s intent, the sufficiency of documentation, or competing claims to ownership. When contested, the court will evaluate evidence presented by both sides and may hold a contested hearing to determine whether the petition meets the legal standard for recognition of trust property. If the petition is contested, the process can take longer and may involve additional discovery or evidentiary hearings. Preparing robust documentary support and credible declarations in advance strengthens the petition and can help resolve disputes more quickly, but contested matters should be approached with careful procedural planning to address potential challenges effectively.
If the court grants the Heggstad Petition, it will issue an order declaring the specified property to be part of the trust and directing the trustee’s authority to manage or distribute the asset under the trust terms. After the order, the trustee can present it to banks, title companies, or registries to effectuate the transfer, record deeds, or access accounts. The order provides legal authority to complete these administrative steps and allows distribution according to the trust without the need for full probate for that asset. Following a favorable order, we assist trustees with the necessary post-order steps such as recording deeds, coordinating with financial institutions, and updating asset records. That implementation ensures the court’s ruling translates into practical transfers and allows beneficiaries to receive distributions under the trust provisions in an orderly and documented manner.
Alternatives to a Heggstad Petition may include formal probate, small estate procedures, or negotiated settlements among beneficiaries that accomplish asset transfers without court orders. In some cases, institutions will accept a pour-over will, beneficiary designations, or trust certification to transfer assets without a petition. The right alternative depends on the asset type, its value, and the willingness of institutions and interested parties to cooperate with trustee requests. When documents are unclear or parties disagree, probate or other court-supervised proceedings may be necessary. Evaluating the facts early with counsel helps determine whether a petition, probate, or another approach best balances speed, cost, and the need to protect the decedent’s intent and respond to creditor or beneficiary concerns.
A Heggstad Petition itself does not change tax liabilities, but transferring assets and administering a trust can have tax implications depending on the asset type and estate circumstances. Trustee actions following an order—such as selling real property or distributing retirement assets—may trigger tax reporting or liabilities. Creditors’ claims must also be considered, because courts may require notice to creditors or allow claim periods that could affect distributions. Proper handling of notices and creditor timelines helps protect trustees and beneficiaries while complying with California law. When tax or creditor issues are likely, a comprehensive plan that addresses potential liabilities and filing requirements is important. Counsel can help identify tax filings that may be needed and coordinate with accountants or other advisors as necessary to address tax consequences and creditor claim procedures during or after the petition process.
Begin by collecting the trust document, deeds, account records, and any evidence that shows the decedent intended the asset to be part of the trust. Gather copies of pour-over wills, assignment forms, correspondence with financial institutions, and any witness statements that corroborate the grantor’s intent. Early documentation supports a stronger petition filing and clarifies whether the petition is the most appropriate route. Next, consult with counsel familiar with trust administration and probate procedure in Santa Cruz County to evaluate options and prepare necessary filings. A prompt assessment helps determine whether a Heggstad Petition, probate, or another procedure best achieves the decedent’s estate planning goals and protects the rights of beneficiaries while minimizing delays and costs.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas