A general assignment of assets to a trust is a fundamental estate planning document used to transfer ownership of certain property into a trust when formal retitling is pending or impractical. This approach can help consolidate assets under the terms of an existing revocable living trust, avoiding gaps that leave property outside the trust. Although the assignment itself does not change the terms of the trust, it clarifies intent and helps trustees and successors identify which assets were intended to be governed by the trust at the settlor’s death. It is important to review any assignment carefully to ensure it reflects current wishes and state law requirements.
When considering a general assignment of assets to a trust, people often want clarity on which assets are included and how the transfer interacts with other estate documents such as pour-over wills, powers of attorney, and trust certifications. A general assignment typically lists categories of property or describes assets by reference to the settlor’s ownership rather than retitling each account, making it a practical tool for some estates. It can be paired with a trust funding review to identify assets that still require direct retitling. Understanding the benefits and limits of this document helps families avoid unintended probate or gaps in a comprehensive plan.
A general assignment of assets to a trust can provide transitional control over assets, reduce uncertainty for successors, and clarify which property the settlor intended to be included in a trust. In circumstances where immediate retitling is impractical, the assignment serves as evidence of intent to include assets in trust administration. It may streamline administration by enabling trustees to identify and collect assets under trust terms, while reducing the risk that property will pass by intestacy or require separate probate administration. That said, the effectiveness of an assignment depends on accurate drafting and alignment with other estate documents and applicable state law requirements.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provides estate planning services from San Jose with a focus on practical, client-centered documents that meet California requirements. Our practice assists clients with trust funding, wills, powers of attorney, and related filings. We aim to create clear, durable paperwork that reflects clients’ intentions and helps families transition assets according to those intentions. Clients can expect careful document review, clear explanations of options, and guidance through steps needed to implement a trust-based plan that fits each family’s situation, financial picture, and long-term goals.
A general assignment of assets to a trust typically functions as a written statement transferring ownership or rights to property from an individual to a trust. It is often used alongside a trust to address assets that have not been formally retitled into trust name. The document can identify categories of property or refer to assets owned by the settlor at a given time, and serves as evidence of intent to place those assets under trust management. While useful in many scenarios, it is not a substitute for proper funding of high-value accounts or for beneficiary designations that must be handled separately.
Clients should be aware that a general assignment’s effectiveness depends on state law and the specific account rules governing certain assets. Retirement accounts, some insurance contracts, and certain titled assets often require beneficiary designations or retitling to effect a transfer. The assignment can simplify the trust administration process by documenting intent and helping trustees locate assets, but careful review of each asset type and supplemental steps may still be necessary to ensure that property is controlled by the trust according to the settlor’s wishes.
A general assignment is a written instrument by which the owner assigns property, rights, or interests to a trust, often referencing the settlor’s existing revocable living trust. It may be broad in scope, assigning all personal property not otherwise titled, or it may target specific categories of assets. The document clarifies intent and can be used as part of a funding strategy to support trust administration. The assignment may be recorded or retained with estate records so trustees and successors can establish the transfer path for assets after the settlor’s death or during incapacity.
A complete general assignment should identify the assigning party, the trust receiving the property, and the assets or categories being assigned. It should include clear language of transfer and execution formalities consistent with state requirements. Supporting documents such as account statements, a trust certification, and a pour-over will may accompany the assignment to clarify intent. After execution, practical steps include gathering records, notifying relevant institutions, and, where necessary, completing retitling or beneficiary updates for accounts that require those formalities to effectuate a transfer outside of probate.
Understanding common terms helps clients make informed decisions about trust funding and assignments. This section outlines basic vocabulary such as settlor, trustee, beneficiary, funding, retitling, pour-over will, and trust certification. Each term relates to the mechanics of how assets are held and transferred within a trust-centered plan. Clear definitions reduce confusion during administration and guide the necessary actions to ensure assets are governed by the trust. Reviewing these terms together with your documents ensures everyone involved knows how property should be managed and distributed.
The settlor, sometimes called the grantor, is the person who creates a trust and typically transfers assets into it. This individual sets the trust’s terms, designates beneficiaries and trustees, and can retain the right to amend or revoke the trust while alive if the trust is revocable. A clear assignment should reference the settlor and the trust name so future trustees can determine intent. Identifying the settlor reduces ambiguity when gathering assets and ensures the transfer aligns with the settlor’s documented wishes and the trust instrument.
Trust funding refers to the process of transferring assets into a trust so they are governed by the trust’s terms. Funding may involve retitling property, changing account ownership, updating deeds, or using assignments to document intent for assets not immediately retitled. Effective funding simplifies administration and can reduce the need for probate. Some assets require specific procedures beyond an assignment, so a funding review identifies where retitling, beneficiary changes, or additional documentation are needed to make the trust fully effective for asset management and distribution.
A trustee is the person or entity charged with managing trust assets in accordance with the trust terms and applicable law. The trustee’s duties include collecting and managing assets, following distribution instructions, keeping records, and communicating with beneficiaries. When a general assignment is used, the trustee must locate and collect assigned assets and ensure proper administration under the trust document. Understanding trustee responsibilities helps settlors structure documents so trustees can perform their role effectively and make transitions smoother for family members.
A pour-over will acts as a safety net by directing any assets not already in the trust at the settlor’s death to be transferred into the trust for administration. The will does not avoid probate for those assets, but it ensures the trust ultimately governs their distribution. A general assignment works alongside a pour-over will by documenting intent to include assets in the trust and supporting efficient administration. Together, these documents aim to align the estate’s actual assets with the settlor’s plan and reduce uncertainty for successors handling the estate.
There are different ways to place assets under a trust, including direct retitling, beneficiary designation changes, deeds for real property, and general assignments. Direct retitling provides clear ownership in the trust name and often simplifies administration, but it can require paperwork for multiple accounts. A general assignment offers a practical alternative when retitling is not immediately feasible, documenting intent to include assets. Choosing the right approach depends on asset type, costs, timing, and legal requirements. A careful review balances immediate needs with long-term clarity and control of the estate plan.
A limited approach, such as using a general assignment for small personal property and household items, can be effective when items have modest monetary value or when retitling would be impractical. Assigning these categories to a trust documents the settlor’s intent without requiring separate title changes for each low-value item. This can reduce administrative burden while ensuring those items are included in the trust distribution. Nonetheless, even modest property should be listed or described clearly to avoid confusion for successors during trust administration and to confirm that those items were intended to pass under trust terms.
A general assignment can serve as a temporary solution when a settlor is reorganizing assets or preparing more permanent retitling but cannot complete those steps immediately. During a transition period, the assignment records intent and helps ensure assets are considered part of the trust until formal funding is finished. It provides a bridge that can be relied upon by trustees when gathering estate property. Careful follow-up is still necessary to convert temporary assignments into clear ownership changes where required by account rules or state law to avoid future complications.
When a person owns multiple accounts, businesses, real estate, or retirement plans, a comprehensive funding review helps identify which assets need retitling, beneficiary updates, or other actions. A general assignment may be part of a larger strategy, but complex holdings often require more precise steps to ensure each asset passes according to the settlor’s plan. A full review identifies potential conflicts, tax considerations, and account-specific restrictions so that the trust plan functions smoothly and aligns with the settlor’s overall goals for asset preservation and family transition.
High-value assets, real estate, and title-sensitive property typically require direct retitling or deed changes to ensure the trust holds legal ownership. Relying solely on a general assignment for these assets can create uncertainty or disputes. A full funding plan addresses record changes and potential tax or creditor implications related to transferring title. Proper documentation and legal steps help preserve the asset’s value and ensure distributions follow the settlor’s instructions. A coordinated approach minimizes the chance that important items will remain outside the trust when it is time to administer the estate.
A comprehensive funding approach aims to ensure assets are properly aligned with the trust so administration is straightforward, distribution instructions are clear, and beneficiaries face fewer obstacles. By systematically retitling accounts, updating beneficiary designations, and documenting assignments where appropriate, owners reduce the likelihood of probate and minimize confusion among successors. This process also reveals accounts or property that may have been overlooked and provides a plan for handling assets that cannot be immediately retitled, supporting a smoother transition when the trust becomes operative for distributions or management.
A full funding review can also identify tax planning opportunities and help coordinate how different assets are treated at death or during incapacity. Addressing title issues proactively prevents delay in access to funds and property for trustees or designated agents who must manage affairs. Clear documentation reduces disputes and provides a roadmap for trustees and family members. Ultimately, thorough funding promotes peace of mind by aligning paperwork with the settlor’s intentions and ensuring the estate plan functions as intended when it matters most.
Proper funding helps keep assets out of probate by ensuring they are owned by the trust or have beneficiary designations that pass outside court administration. This can shorten the time before beneficiaries receive distributions and reduce court-related costs and procedures. Having clear documentation, including assignments for assets awaiting formal retitling, can make it easier for trustees to gather assets and carry out trust terms efficiently. Reducing probate involvement helps families avoid additional expense and public proceedings, preserving privacy and maintaining smoother transitions for personal and financial affairs.
A comprehensive approach provides trustees and beneficiaries with the information they need to administer the trust according to the settlor’s wishes. Clear titling, supporting assignments, and up-to-date ancillary documents reduce uncertainty and conflict. Trustees can locate assets more quickly and make informed decisions without prolonged investigation or dispute resolution. When the plan clearly shows which assets belong to the trust and how distributions should occur, family members and fiduciaries can focus on implementing the settlor’s objectives rather than resolving ownership issues, preserving relationships and reducing administration costs.
When preparing a general assignment, use specific language that identifies the settlor, the trust by name and date, and a clear description of the assets or categories being assigned. Vague wording can create uncertainty for trustees and beneficiaries, so recording intent precisely reduces the risk of misunderstandings. Attach schedules or account lists where helpful, and keep copies with the trust records. Clear documentation makes it easier to confirm which assets were meant to pass through the trust and supports a smoother process for successors carrying out the plan.
Maintain organized records of the assignment, trust documents, account statements, and any related deeds or beneficiary forms. Life changes such as marriage, divorce, property sales, or new accounts may affect what assets should be included in the trust. Periodic reviews ensure the assignment and related documents still reflect current ownership and intentions. Regular updates help prevent gaps in funding and reduce the likelihood of unintended outcomes for successors. Clear, current records make administration more efficient when the trust becomes operative.
Consider a general assignment when you have personal property, smaller accounts, or assets that are difficult to retitle individually and you want to document an intention to include them in your trust. It can also serve as an interim tool while you complete a broader funding plan or reorganize holdings. A general assignment can reduce uncertainty and demonstrate that certain categories of property were meant to be governed by the trust. This helps trustees and successors know how to proceed, though it should be part of a coordinated plan that addresses assets requiring specific transfer procedures.
You may also consider an assignment if you are finalizing an estate plan and want a single document that captures miscellaneous assets that might otherwise be overlooked. Paired with a pour-over will and trust certification, the assignment helps ensure assets are consolidated under the trust at administration. It is useful for people who own many small items or have recently moved assets and need time to complete formal retitling. A careful assessment of each asset type ensures the assignment effectively complements the rest of your estate plan.
Typical situations that call for a general assignment include estates with numerous small items, recently acquired assets that have not been retitled, and households where the trust exists but some property remains in the settlor’s name. It may also be used when a settlor is temporarily unable to manage retitling due to time or health constraints and needs a reliable way to indicate intent. The assignment documents the settlor’s wishes and assists trustees in gathering assets during administration, while longer-term funding steps are completed as needed.
When a person holds many bank, brokerage, or personal property items, retitling each account or item may be burdensome. A general assignment can consolidate intent for numerous lower-value assets and provide trustees with a guide for locating and including them in trust administration. It is particularly useful for movable personal property or accounts that do not easily convert into trust ownership. Following up with a funding plan for larger or title-sensitive assets ensures a balanced approach between practicality and legal clarity.
Assets recently acquired or still being transferred at the time the trust is created may not be retitled immediately. A general assignment records the settlor’s intention for those items to belong to the trust once transfers are complete. This reduces the risk those assets will be overlooked or treated inconsistently during administration. Maintaining updated records and following through with formal title changes when possible helps integrate recent acquisitions into the trust seamlessly and avoids later disputes over ownership or distribution.
If a settlor is facing a period of incapacity or a transition that prevents handling retitling, a general assignment can serve as a practical interim measure. It documents intent and assists designated agents in identifying assets that should be managed for the settlor’s benefit under the trust. While it provides helpful direction, trustees and agents should still coordinate with account holders and complete formal steps where required. Combining assignments with financial powers of attorney and trust certifications supports continuity of management during uncertain periods.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provides guidance for Central Valley residents and clients in the wider San Jose area on trust funding, assignments, and estate planning documents. We assist with drafting general assignments, reviewing trust instruments, coordinating pour-over wills, and identifying assets that require additional action. Our approach emphasizes practical, well-documented plans that reflect clients’ goals while complying with California law. Clients receive clear explanations of steps to take and assistance in implementing a funding strategy that reduces uncertainty for family members and fiduciaries.
Our practice focuses on helping clients translate their intentions into written documents that work within California’s legal framework. We assist with general assignments to ensure they are drafted to complement existing trusts and related documents. By reviewing the full estate plan, we help identify assets that require retitling or beneficiary updates and create a coordinated approach to funding. Clients benefit from practical guidance on how to structure assignments and supporting paperwork so trustees can act with clarity.
We place emphasis on clear communication, careful drafting, and organized records so trustees and family members have the information they need at the time of administration. Our services include preparing assignments, coordinating deed changes, and advising on account-specific requirements. This reduces the administrative burden on successors and helps align the estate’s actual assets with the settlor’s documented plan. We work to make the process efficient and transparent for clients and their families.
Clients often find value in a comprehensive funding review to accompany any assignment. This review identifies potential gaps, suggests practical steps for retitling, and clarifies how trust assets will be located and managed. By combining an assignment with appropriate supplementary actions, families reduce the risk of asset oversight and make it simpler for trustees to carry out distributions according to the trust’s terms. We assist with each stage of this process to promote a smooth transition when it is needed.
Our process begins with a thorough review of your trust documents, wills, powers of attorney, and current asset statements to identify what is already in the trust and what remains outside. We prepare or review a general assignment when appropriate, advise on required retitling or beneficiary changes, and assemble clear records for trustees. Communication with financial institutions and title companies is coordinated as needed. Throughout the process, we prioritize document clarity and practical steps that help ensure assets are governed by the trust as intended.
The first step is a comprehensive inventory of assets and a careful review of existing estate documents. This includes identifying bank accounts, investment accounts, real property, retirement plans, life insurance, and personal property. We compare ownership records with the trust instrument to find gaps and determine which assets can be retitled directly, which need beneficiary updates, and which are candidates for a general assignment. The inventory helps prioritize actions and creates a clear plan to bring assets under trust control where appropriate.
Collecting up-to-date account statements, deeds, titles, and beneficiary forms is essential to document ownership and make informed recommendations. Accurate records allow us to determine whether property is properly titled to the trust, subject to beneficiary designations, or pending transfer. This step reduces the risk that an asset will be overlooked and ensures the assignment or retitling plan addresses each relevant item. Clear documentation also assists trustees by providing a roadmap of where assets are located and how they relate to the trust.
Certain assets require specific title changes or beneficiary actions to effect a transfer outside probate, such as retirement accounts, life insurance, and real property. Identifying those accounts early lets us advise on appropriate steps to align them with the trust. A general assignment can help for some categories but will not replace necessary title changes. Recognizing title-sensitive items during the initial review prevents future complications and helps prioritize which transactions should be handled immediately and which can be planned for over time.
Once assets are identified and priorities set, we prepare a general assignment tailored to the client’s trust and property profile. The assignment names the trust, describes the assets or categories being assigned, and is executed in compliance with applicable formalities. Where additional documents are needed for specific accounts, we prepare those forms and coordinate with institutions. After execution, we advise on record-keeping and next steps for retitling or beneficiary updates to complete the funding process and minimize gaps in trust ownership.
Assignment language should be specific enough to make the settlor’s intent clear but flexible enough to cover assets that are difficult to list individually. We draft wording that references the trust by legal title and date and describes categories or identifiers that make it practical for trustees. If an attached schedule better captures certain items, we include that as part of the record. Thoughtful drafting reduces ambiguity and helps ensure the assignment functions as intended during administration.
After executing an assignment, we often coordinate with banks, brokerage houses, and title companies to confirm whether further steps are required to transfer ownership or update account records. Some institutions accept the assignment as supporting documentation, while others require formal retitling. We guide clients through these communications and help complete any additional paperwork. This coordination is important to align institutional records with the trust plan and to avoid surprises when assets are needed for trustee management or distribution.
After initial funding and assignments are completed, maintaining clear records and conducting periodic reviews keeps the estate plan current. We recommend storing executed assignments, trust certifications, deeds, and beneficiary forms together and scheduling reviews when life events occur. Periodic updates address new accounts, property transfers, or changes in family circumstances. Ongoing attention ensures the trust continues to reflect the settlor’s intentions and reduces the likelihood of assets being unintentionally left outside the trust in the future.
Assembling a comprehensive file with the trust instrument, assignments, account summaries, and key contact information makes administration easier for trustees and successors. Clear labeling and instructions for access help avoid delays during critical periods. We help clients create an organized set of records and suggest practical ways to store documents securely while keeping them accessible to authorized parties. Well-maintained records promote efficient management and reduce the administrative burden during trust administration.
Life changes can affect asset ownership and the adequacy of previous funding steps, so periodic reviews help maintain alignment with the trust plan. We recommend a scheduled review after major events such as changes in family structure, real estate transactions, or new account openings. Revisiting assignments, retitling status, and beneficiary designations ensures there are no unexpected gaps. Regular maintenance protects the settlor’s intentions and supports a reliable, long-term estate plan that meets evolving needs.
A general assignment of assets to a trust is a written instrument by which a person assigns ownership or rights in certain property to a trust, often referencing the trust by name and date. It is commonly used when retitling each account or item is impractical or when the settlor wishes to document intent for miscellaneous personal property, bank accounts, or other movable items. The assignment clarifies that the settlor intended those assets to be governed by the trust’s terms and assists trustees in identifying property that should be collected into the trust for administration. People typically use an assignment as part of a broader funding strategy that may include retitling deeds, updating beneficiary designations, and preparing a pour-over will. While an assignment helps document intent and can streamline the process of gathering assets, its effectiveness depends on the type of asset and the institution’s policies. It is most useful for assets that do not require formal title changes or beneficiary designations, while certain account types will still require separate steps to transfer ownership outside probate.
A general assignment can help indicate that certain personal property or accounts are intended to belong to a trust, but it does not automatically avoid probate for every type of asset. Assets that are properly titled in the trust’s name or that carry nonprobate beneficiary designations will pass outside of probate, but items that remain solely in the settlor’s individual name and require probate procedures may not be avoided simply by an assignment. The legal effect depends on state law and the specific transfer rules for each asset category. Retirement accounts, payable-on-death accounts, insurance policies, and real estate typically require specific actions such as beneficiary updates, retitling, or deeds to ensure transfer outside probate. An assignment is often used in combination with these other measures and with a pour-over will as a backup, but relying solely on an assignment without addressing title and beneficiary issues can leave assets subject to probate or delay in administration.
A pour-over will serves as a safety net by directing any assets still in the settlor’s name at death to be transferred into the trust for administration. It does not prevent probate for assets that are not already titled to the trust, but it ensures that assets that pass through probate ultimately get administered under the trust’s terms. The general assignment complements a pour-over will by documenting intent for assets that the settlor expects to be part of the trust, helping trustees and successors understand how those assets should be handled. Together, the assignment and pour-over will provide a coordinated approach: the assignment records intent and helps locate assets while the pour-over will addresses any property that still needs probate to be transferred into the trust. Using both documents reduces uncertainty and clarifies the settlor’s overall plan, but it is still important to address asset-specific transfer requirements wherever possible to minimize reliance on probate.
Generally, retirement accounts such as 401(k)s and IRAs have their own rules for beneficiary designations and typically cannot be transferred to a trust by a simple assignment alone. These accounts usually pass according to the beneficiary designation on file with the plan or account custodian, and some plans may allow naming a trust as a beneficiary under specific conditions. Because of tax and distribution rules governing retirement accounts, it is important to follow the custodian’s required procedures and consider the implications of naming a trust as beneficiary. An assignment can document intent for certain assets, but it will not substitute for the required beneficiary forms or plan-specific rules for retirement accounts. When retirement accounts are part of an estate plan, a review of beneficiary designations and possible coordination with trust provisions is necessary to ensure the accounts are handled in a way that aligns with the settlor’s objectives and complies with applicable plan rules.
Including a schedule of assets with a general assignment can be very helpful to provide clarity about what the settlor intends to assign to the trust. An attached schedule listing account numbers, descriptions, or categories of personal property makes it easier for trustees and successors to locate and collect the items referenced. It reduces ambiguity and provides a practical reference during trust administration, particularly when dealing with numerous small items or accounts that are difficult to describe succinctly in the body of an assignment document. However, schedules should be drafted carefully so that they remain accurate over time and do not inadvertently create conflicts with other documents or titles. Periodic reviews and updates to the schedule are recommended to reflect new acquisitions, sales, or retitling. Keeping the schedule and assignment together with trust records helps preserve clarity and supports efficient administration when the trust becomes operative.
A trustee can rely on a general assignment as evidence of the settlor’s intent to include certain assets in the trust, but reliance should be coupled with steps to confirm actual ownership and account rules. Trustees often use the assignment as a starting point to gather records, contact institutions, and identify assets for administration. When an assignment is well-drafted and supported by accompanying documentation, it provides useful guidance to trustees about which items the settlor intended to be part of the trust. While the assignment assists trustees, it does not eliminate the need to verify titles, beneficiary designations, or institution-specific requirements. Trustees should confirm ownership and complete necessary transfers or claim processes to secure assets for trust administration. Doing so reduces the risk of disputes and ensures the trustee can manage assets in alignment with the trust’s provisions.
It is advisable to review assignment documents and the overall trust funding status periodically, especially after major life events like marriage, divorce, property sales, or the opening of new accounts. Regular reviews allow for updates to schedules, beneficiary designations, and retitling that may be necessary to keep the trust aligned with current intentions. Scheduling periodic reviews ensures that new assets are appropriately addressed and reduces the chance that items will be left outside the trust unintentionally. A review every few years or after significant financial changes helps maintain the integrity of the estate plan. During a review, check that the assignment language remains appropriate, that any attached schedules are current, and that account-specific requirements have been met where necessary. Clear records and periodic maintenance support effective administration and reduce complications for successors.
Keep executed copies of the general assignment, the trust instrument, any attached schedules, deeds, account statements, beneficiary designation forms, and the certification of trust together in an organized file. Having consolidated records reduces administrative delays and helps trustees quickly locate documentation proving the settlor’s intent and the trust’s terms. Include contact information for financial institutions, title companies, and any relevant advisors to assist trustees in communicating and completing any required steps during administration. Store documents securely but make them accessible to authorized fiduciaries or designated agents. Consider both physical and digital storage with appropriate safeguards to protect sensitive information while maintaining availability when needed. Clear labeling and a simple index of key documents further assist trustees and family members during critical moments.
Yes, a general assignment can usually be revoked or amended by the settlor while they have the capacity to make such changes, particularly if the trust is revocable. Amending or revoking requires following the same formalities applicable to the original document, including executing a signed amendment or revocation in accordance with applicable state law and keeping updated records. When making changes, it is important to coordinate them with other estate documents such as the trust instrument and beneficiary forms to maintain consistency across the plan. If the settlor’s circumstances change, updating the assignment and any related schedules ensures the documents continue to reflect current intentions. After amendments are executed, replace older copies in the organized records and notify relevant institutions if needed. Timely updates prevent confusion later and help trustees and successors carry out the settlor’s revised wishes effectively.
After executing a general assignment, the next steps typically include organizing and storing the executed document with the trust records, compiling any attached schedules or account statements, and notifying trustees or agents about the existence and location of the assignment. Where accounts or property require additional action to transfer into the trust, such as deed changes, retitling, or beneficiary updates, those steps should be coordinated with financial institutions and title companies. Keeping a clear checklist helps ensure that assets are addressed appropriately over time. Following execution, a funding review is recommended to identify any remaining items requiring attention and to plan for periodic updates. Maintaining current records and working through necessary retitling actions reduces the likelihood that assets will remain outside the trust and helps trustees administer the estate according to the settlor’s documented intent. Ongoing attention preserves the effectiveness of the trust plan over time.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas