A Heggstad petition is a legal action used when a trustmaker intended to transfer real property into a trust but the deed or title was never properly changed. Families in Cottonwood and throughout Shasta County turn to this process to align real property ownership with the terms of a revocable living trust. At the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman we help clients understand whether a Heggstad petition fits their situation, explain potential outcomes, and outline the steps needed to ask the court to recognize that trust ownership was intended. This introduction explains why a Heggstad petition may be necessary and what to expect from the initial review.
If a property owner signed a trust document but left the deed in their personal name, a Heggstad petition can provide a judicial declaration that the property should be treated as trust property. The petition helps prevent future disputes among heirs, clarifies title for sale or refinancing, and preserves the estate plan the decedent intended. For residents of Cottonwood and nearby communities, taking timely action helps avoid prolonged uncertainty. Our firm reviews trust paperwork, deeds, and witness statements, then prepares a petition that presents clear evidence of the trustmaker’s intent and the circumstances that led to the omission.
A Heggstad petition can resolve a gap between the written trust and recorded title, delivering clarity and legal recognition that property belongs to the trust. This matters when heirs, buyers, or lenders need certainty about ownership. It can smooth property transfers without reopening probate, protect the trustmaker’s intentions, and reduce the risk of contested claims later. By obtaining a court determination, beneficiaries and successors gain the authority to manage or transfer the property according to the trust. The petition therefore supports effective estate administration and helps families avoid lengthy disagreements over whether property should pass through probate or follow the trust terms.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman assists California residents with trust and estate matters including Heggstad petitions. Our approach focuses on clear communication, careful document review, and strategic court filings tailored to each client’s circumstances. For Cottonwood clients we explain the evidence needed to show that property was intended to be in a revocable living trust, prepare declarations and supporting exhibits, and pursue a resolution that aligns title with the estate plan. We work closely with family members and fiduciaries to minimize conflict, provide realistic timelines, and support practical outcomes that allow property transactions and trust administration to proceed smoothly.
A Heggstad petition asks the court to declare that real property intended for a revocable living trust should be treated as trust property despite the title remaining in the decedent’s name. The petition typically includes the trust document, the deed, testimony or declarations from people familiar with the trustmaker’s intent, and evidence of attempts to transfer title. In California courts the process focuses on the trustmaker’s intent at the time of the trust signing. The petition can be used for residential or other real property and is often preferable to reopening probate when the trust was meant to hold the asset.
Filing a Heggstad petition begins with a careful review of the trust, deeds, and related records to identify gaps and supporting evidence. The petitioner must show that the trustmaker intended the property to be governed by the trust and that the failure to transfer title was an oversight or administrative omission. The court then considers declarations, documentary evidence, and potentially limited testimony to make a ruling. The result, if successful, is a judicial declaration that the property is part of the trust, enabling trustees or beneficiaries to act in accordance with the trust terms without resorting to probate administration.
A Heggstad petition is a narrow legal remedy designed to correct the formal record so it aligns with the trustmaker’s intent. It differs from a full probate proceeding because it seeks only a determination about title or ownership as it relates to a trust. Courts evaluate the trust document, any transfers made or intended, and statements from witnesses or fiduciaries who can attest to the trustmaker’s plans. The petition is commonly used when the creator of a revocable living trust failed to complete a deed transfer before death or incapacity, leaving the property technically outside the trust despite clear documentary intent.
Essential elements include the trust document, the recorded deed or title showing the property remains in the decedent’s name, and supporting declarations describing the trustmaker’s intent. The process usually starts with gathering records and drafting a petition that outlines the facts and requests a court declaration. The petition is served on interested parties such as beneficiaries and potential heirs, who have an opportunity to respond. The court reviews written evidence and may hold a hearing to decide whether the property should be recognized as trust property. If granted, the order provides the legal basis for trustees to manage or transfer the asset under the trust.
Understanding common terms helps clients follow the Heggstad petition process. Terms such as revocable living trust, trustee, trustmaker, deed of trust, title, beneficiary, and probate frequently appear in documents and court filings. Knowing what these words mean, along with phrases like declaration, chain of title, and pour-over will, can make discussions with counsel and the court less confusing. This glossary summarizes those concepts and clarifies how they relate to a petition seeking recognition that property belongs to a trust despite the recorded title remaining in an individual name.
A revocable living trust is a legal document created during a person’s life that holds assets for management and distribution under terms set by the trustmaker. The trustmaker retains the ability to change or revoke the trust while living and often serves as the initial trustee. The trust directs how assets should be handled or distributed upon incapacity or death, and it commonly helps avoid probate for assets properly titled in the trust. When real property is intended to be in a revocable living trust but the deed remains in the decedent’s name, a Heggstad petition can be used to align title with the trustmaker’s written plan.
A deed is the recorded document that demonstrates legal ownership of real property. The title refers to the legal right to possess or transfer the property. If a deed remains in an individual’s name rather than the name of the trust, the recorded title does not reflect the trustmaker’s intention to place the property in the trust. Establishing the correct ownership on the public record matters for sales, refinancing, and transfer of control after death. A Heggstad petition seeks a court declaration to reconcile the deed and the trust to reflect the trustmaker’s intended ownership.
A trustee is the person or institution responsible for managing trust assets in accordance with trust terms, while a beneficiary is someone who receives benefits from the trust. When a trustmaker dies or becomes incapacitated, named successor trustees act to administer the trust. Disputes can arise if the public record shows property in the decedent’s name rather than the trust, leaving trustees without clear title. A Heggstad petition can help trustees obtain the legal recognition needed to act, enabling beneficiaries to receive distributions or allowing the trust to carry out its provisions.
A pour-over will is a will that directs assets not previously transferred to a trust to be moved into that trust upon death. Other related documents include a financial power of attorney, advance health care directive, HIPAA authorization, and certification of trust, each serving a specific administrative or medical purpose. When a pour-over will exists alongside a trust, there may still be reasons to use a Heggstad petition to align title for real property meant to belong to the trust but not properly retitled during the trustmaker’s life. This helps avoid unnecessary probate and clarifies administration.
When property remains in a decedent’s name despite a trust, options include filing a Heggstad petition, initiating probate, or pursuing a quiet title action depending on the facts. Probate can be time consuming and costly, while a Heggstad petition focuses narrowly on clarifying that property belongs to the trust. Quiet title actions address ownership disputes broadly but may not relate directly to trust intent. The best route depends on documentation, parties involved, and the property type. Our role is to explain the tradeoffs so clients in Cottonwood can choose a path aligned with the estate plan and family goals.
A limited Heggstad petition can be sufficient if the trust document explicitly references the property and the deed omission appears to be an administrative oversight. In such cases the court can often rely on documentary evidence and declarations to conclude that the property was intended for the trust. This streamlined approach avoids broader probate administration and keeps focus on aligning title with the trust. It is appropriate when there are no competing claims and the record establishes the trustmaker’s intent with reasonable clarity, enabling a quicker resolution for trustees and beneficiaries.
When beneficiaries and potential heirs agree that the property belongs to the trust, a limited petition is often adequate because it primarily confirms the trustmaker’s intent rather than resolves contested claims. Cooperation reduces litigation risk and can make court proceedings more efficient. The petition still requires evidence but may be resolved on declarations and documentary exhibits without extensive hearings. This path is particularly beneficial when family members want to transfer or sell property promptly and prefer to keep administration focused and cost effective.
A comprehensive legal approach may be necessary when heirs or other parties dispute whether property belongs to the trust, or when competing claims arise that could affect ownership. In such scenarios it may be necessary to gather more extensive evidence, prepare for contested hearings, and coordinate multiple filings to protect the trust’s interests. A broader strategy may involve discovery, depositions, or additional motions to address challenges to the trustmaker’s intent. When conflict exists, careful litigation planning helps protect property rights and supports a resolution that reflects the trust documents and applicable law.
Complex circumstances such as clouded title, multiple properties across counties, or prior transfers can require a comprehensive legal approach beyond a simple petition. Issues like liens, encumbrances, or conflicting deeds may need resolution before title can be aligned with a trust. Additionally, coordination with lenders, title companies, and county recorders is often required to clear the record and facilitate subsequent transactions. In these cases a full assessment and multi-step plan provide the structure necessary to move forward in a way that protects beneficiaries and preserves the intentions expressed in estate planning documents.
A careful and comprehensive approach to a Heggstad petition reduces the risk of later challenges and helps secure clear title for trust assets. By assembling detailed evidence, preparing complete filings, and addressing potential creditor or heir concerns early, trustees can avoid surprises that delay administration. This approach also supports smoother sales or refinancing since title issues are resolved up front. For families in Cottonwood, a proactive strategy aims to protect the estate plan, provide legal certainty, and allow trustees to carry out distributions or transactions without unnecessary administrative obstacles.
Comprehensive handling increases the likelihood that the court will issue a decisive order and that title companies will accept the resulting documentation. It can reduce the total time and cost in the long run by preventing follow up litigation. Coordinating with real estate and title professionals as part of the process ensures that once the court grants relief, the property can be recorded in the correct name promptly. Ultimately, a thorough plan helps families move forward confidently, minimizing the likelihood of disputes and ensuring the trustmaker’s plan is carried out.
One of the primary benefits is having title cleared so trustees can sell, refinance, or transfer property without the complications of an unresolved ownership record. Clear title benefits beneficiaries by enabling efficient administration and supports marketability for real estate transactions. When the court affirms that property belongs to the trust, title companies and lenders generally accept the order as the basis for updating records and facilitating transfers. This practical clarity reduces delays and allows the trust to function as intended for the benefit of designated beneficiaries.
A comprehensive approach lowers the risk that missing documentation or ambiguities will result in future litigation among heirs or creditors. By thoroughly documenting the trustmaker’s intent and addressing potential challenges early, the petition is more likely to withstand post-judgment scrutiny. This stability helps trustees manage assets and distribute benefits without fear of reopening the matter later. A carefully prepared record supports lasting resolution and gives beneficiaries confidence that the trust terms will be followed and property will be administered as intended.
Collecting the trust document, recorded deed, previous wills, and any related correspondence or declarations is essential before filing. Early document gathering establishes the underlying facts and saves time during preparation. Include title reports, mortgage statements, and evidence of payments or improvements that show the trustmaker treated the property as trust assets. Having a clear chain of documents helps frame the petition to demonstrate intent and minimizes the need for additional discovery. Organized documentation also helps communicate with title companies and court clerks efficiently.
Engaging title companies and lenders early can prevent later obstacles to recording a court order or completing a sale. Title officers can advise on the documentation they require once a court issues an order recognizing trust ownership. Lenders may need notification if a mortgage exists or if refinancing is planned. Coordinated effort ensures that after the court ruling is obtained, the technical steps to update the public record and clear title can be executed smoothly. This planning reduces transactional delays and aligns court relief with real estate industry practices.
Residents consider a Heggstad petition when a trustmaker clearly intended real property to be held in a revocable living trust but the deed remains in their individual name. The petition avoids reopening probate where possible, aligns ownership with the estate plan, and allows trustees to administer or transfer property as the trust directs. For families facing the sale of property, refinancing, or simple clarity after a death, the petition helps remove legal uncertainty. Timely action preserves the trustmaker’s decisions and facilitates practical resolution for beneficiaries and administrators alike.
Another reason to pursue this service is to address title irregularities that interfere with financial transactions or estate administration. Lenders, title companies, and buyers often require clear title before closing; a court declaration that the property belongs to the trust makes these transactions possible. Additionally, taking action promptly can deter claims from distant heirs and prevent prolonged disputes. For Cottonwood families, resolving title issues with a focused petition supports efficient trust administration, reduces stress, and allows assets to be managed in accordance with the trustmaker’s documented intentions.
Typical circumstances include when a trustmaker created a revocable living trust but failed to record a deed transferring property into the trust, when a property was omitted from the trust due to oversight, or when a pour-over will indicates the trust was intended but the property remained in the decedent’s name. Other situations involve missing or incomplete documentation, administrative errors by title companies or attorneys, and cases where a trustee needs formal court recognition to manage or sell property. Each scenario requires tailored documentation and a petition that demonstrates intent and circumstances.
A frequent reason for filing a Heggstad petition is that the deed was never changed to reflect trust ownership after the trust was signed. This can occur because the trustmaker deferred the administrative step, there was an oversight, or circumstances prevented transfer before death. Although the trust document clearly expresses intent, the recorded deed shows different ownership, creating a discrepancy that blocks trust administration. A successful petition provides the necessary judicial declaration so trustees can manage, sell, or transfer the property under the trust terms.
Title issues are often uncovered when owners attempt to sell or refinance property and a title company identifies the deed name does not match trust records. When this occurs, the parties may pause the transaction until ownership is clarified. A Heggstad petition can resolve the discrepancy by showing the trustmaker intended the property to be part of the trust, enabling the sale or refinance to proceed. Addressing the issue promptly prevents transaction delays and provides buyers and lenders with the legal assurance they require.
After the trustmaker’s death, successor trustees may find they lack clear recorded authority to act because the deed remains in the decedent’s name. Without title in the trust, trustees may face obstacles selling property or distributing proceeds to beneficiaries. Filing a Heggstad petition gives the court the chance to declare the property part of the trust, granting trustees the legal basis to proceed. This process empowers trustees to carry out trust instructions and ensures the trustmaker’s wishes are honored without full probate when appropriate.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provides legal assistance to Cottonwood residents seeking to resolve trust title issues, including Heggstad petitions. We take the time to review trust documents, deeds, and any supporting evidence to determine the best course of action. For clients in Shasta County, our goal is to provide clear guidance, practical steps, and responsive support to help align property title with the trustmaker’s intentions. We communicate in plain language, outline likely timelines, and help families move forward with confidence and minimal disruption to estate administration.
Our firm focuses on trust and estate matters and offers clients a methodical approach to Heggstad petitions that emphasizes careful document preparation and clear presentation of evidence. We work with trustees, beneficiaries, and family members to assemble declarations, chain of title records, and any other materials a court will consider. For Cottonwood clients this means local knowledge of recorders and court procedures, plus practical advice about interacting with title companies and lenders so relief can be recorded and transactions can proceed smoothly.
We emphasize transparent communication so clients understand expected timelines, potential challenges, and next steps. Preparing a Heggstad petition requires thoughtful assembly of the trust document and supporting proof of intent; we guide clients through that process, explaining how each piece of evidence contributes to the overall case. Our goal is to obtain a decisive court order that enables trustees to act and beneficiaries to receive distributions without unnecessary delay, making the administration of trust assets more efficient and predictable.
When complex title problems or disputes exist we help evaluate all available remedies and coordinate with title officers, lenders, and other professionals. This collaborative approach reduces the risk of post-judgment complications and helps ensure that the court’s order leads to practical results such as the recording of a corrected deed. For residents of Cottonwood and surrounding areas, this means a focused legal path toward restoring alignment between recorded title and the trustmaker’s plan.
Our process begins with a thorough intake and document review to determine whether a Heggstad petition is the appropriate remedy. We collect the trust, recorded deeds, and any statements or communications that reflect the trustmaker’s intent, then advise on the evidence needed to support a petition. After preparing the filing we handle service on interested parties, respond to any objections, and represent the petition at hearings. We keep clients informed about court scheduling and the likely timetable for achieving an order that clarifies title and permits trustees to act.
The first step focuses on assembling the trust document, deed records, title reports, and any contemporaneous writings or declarations that show intent to place the property in the trust. We identify witnesses or fiduciaries who can provide declarations attesting to the trustmaker’s intentions. Gathering comprehensive evidence upfront increases the chance of a streamlined proceeding and reduces the need for additional discovery. This preparatory phase establishes the factual foundation for the petition and informs the drafting of the court filing.
We examine the trust language, dates, signature pages, and any relevant amendments to verify the trustmaker’s expressed plan for the property. Simultaneously we obtain chain of title and recorded deed information from the county recorder to confirm current ownership records. Identifying inconsistencies or supporting details between these documents helps shape the petition. A careful review also flags any title encumbrances or recording issues that may need to be addressed as the court moves to recognize trust ownership.
We prepare declarations from trustees, family members, notaries, or others who can explain the trustmaker’s actions and intentions regarding the property. Supporting evidence may include correspondence, draft deeds, escrow instructions, bills showing payments associated with the property, and testimony regarding transfer attempts. These materials provide a narrative that persuades the court the placement of the property in the trust was intended. Well-crafted declarations reduce ambiguity and help present the petition clearly and persuasively.
Once the petition and exhibits are prepared we file the matter in the appropriate county court and serve notice on interested parties, including beneficiaries and heirs. Proper service ensures all potentially affected persons have the opportunity to respond. The filing includes a clear statement of facts, the legal basis for the requested declaration, and the proposed order. Timely and correct service is critical to avoid procedural challenges and to allow the court to move forward with a hearing or request additional information if needed.
We draft the petition, attach relevant exhibits, and include a proposed form of order that the court can sign if it grants the requested relief. The proposed order typically identifies the property and instructs county recorders or title officers about how to treat the judgment when updating title records. Careful drafting anticipates common follow up questions and helps facilitate the recording of the court’s decision, making it easier for trustees to rely on the order for subsequent transactions like sales or refinancing.
We ensure service is completed in accordance with court rules and handle any responsive filings or objections. If parties object, we evaluate their claims and pursue resolution through written responses or pre-hearing negotiation where appropriate. Managing responses promptly reduces delays and helps keep the matter focused on the evidence supporting the trustmaker’s intent. When necessary, we seek case management dates and coordinate hearings to move the petition toward a final order that clarifies ownership for trust administration or real estate transactions.
If the court requires a hearing we present the written record and supporting declarations to support the petition. The court reviews the evidence and, when persuaded, issues an order declaring the property to be trust property. After a favorable order we guide clients through the recording process so the county records reflect the court’s decision. This final step completes the transition and enables trustees to carry out sales, transfers, or distributions in alignment with the trust document and applicable law.
At any hearing we focus the court on key documentary evidence and clear declarations that demonstrate the trustmaker’s intent to include the property in the trust. Written summaries and pointed argument help the judge understand the factual context, the administrative omission, and the reasons a declaration is appropriate. Where necessary, we address objections and clarify misunderstandings about recording processes or the nature of the relief sought. Our aim is to present a concise record that supports a straightforward judicial determination.
After the court issues an order recognizing trust ownership we coordinate with county recorders and title companies to record documents needed to update the public record. This may include a certified copy of the court order and an application or affidavit acceptable to the recorder. Ensuring the order is properly recorded completes the process, allowing trustees to demonstrate authority to sell or transfer property. Timely recording also reduces the chance of future disputes and supports the smooth administration of the trust.
A Heggstad petition asks the court to declare that property should be treated as part of a revocable living trust even though the deed remains in the decedent’s name. It is used when the trustmaker intended the property to be in the trust but, due to oversight or administrative error, the recorded title does not reflect that intent. The petition focuses narrowly on aligning title with the trust documents and supporting evidence rather than reopening broader estate administration issues. The process relies on documentary evidence and declarations that show the trustmaker’s intent and any attempts to transfer title. If the court is persuaded, it issues an order recognizing the property as trust property, which in turn permits trustees to manage, sell, or transfer the asset in accordance with the trust terms. This remedy is commonly pursued to avoid probate and to provide clear legal authority for trustees.
A Heggstad petition differs from probate because it seeks a judicial declaration about specific property rather than an appointment of an estate administrator and distribution of assets under probate rules. Probate is a comprehensive process for distributing assets that were not properly assigned by a trust or will, whereas a Heggstad petition targets the discrepancy between recorded title and a trust document to confirm trust ownership. The petition is narrower in scope and aims to preserve the trustmaker’s plan without opening full probate. While probate can be costly and time consuming, a successful Heggstad petition can allow trustees to proceed under the trust terms, avoiding the need for broader probate administration where appropriate. Which route is best depends on the estate’s mix of assets, the existence of other omitted items, and whether parties contest the ownership, so a case-specific review helps determine the optimal path.
Typical evidence includes the trust document itself, the recorded deed showing title in the individual name, and declarations from trustees, family members, or others familiar with the trustmaker’s intent. Additional supporting materials might include draft deeds, escrow records, correspondence about intended transfers, payment records, and certification of trust documents. The goal is to provide a clear narrative that the trustmaker intended the property to be part of the trust despite the deed remaining unchanged. The strength of the petition often depends on the clarity and contemporaneity of the evidence. Courts look for reliable documentation and credible declarations that explain why the omission occurred. Gathering comprehensive records and narratives before filing improves the likelihood of a favorable resolution and reduces the need for extended litigation or discovery.
The timeline for a Heggstad petition varies depending on court schedules, whether service is contested, and the complexity of the evidence. In straightforward, uncontested matters where documentation is complete, a petition can move from filing to order within a few months. If there are objections, complex title issues, or scheduling delays, the process may take longer. California county courts have differing calendars and procedures which also affect timing. Preparing the petition thoroughly and communicating with interested parties early can shorten the process. Promptly responding to court requests and coordinating with title officers after an order is obtained expedites recording and subsequent transactions like sales or refinancing. We provide realistic timelines during intake and update clients frequently as the matter progresses.
A Heggstad petition may temporarily pause a sale or refinance if the title company identifies the discrepancy and requires resolution before closing. However, filing the petition and obtaining an expedited hearing or interim agreements with buyers or lenders can often keep transactions moving. Early coordination with the title officer and lender helps identify what documentation is needed and whether the petition must be resolved before closing. If a sale is imminent, sometimes parties agree on short term solutions such as holdbacks or escrow arrangements while the petition is pending. Each situation is unique, so discussing the timeline and options with counsel and the title company early increases the likelihood that a transaction can proceed with minimal disruption.
Interested parties typically include beneficiaries, heirs, and any persons or entities with potential claims to the property, such as a spouse or a creditor. Service requirements follow local court rules and ensure that those who may be affected by the court’s declaration receive notice and the opportunity to object. Proper service is essential to preserve the validity of the court’s order and to avoid procedural challenges later on. In addition to personal notice to individuals, the petition may require publication or other service methods if some parties cannot be located. Counsel arranges service in accordance with statutory and court requirements and handles any subsequent motions related to inadequate service or the need for special notice methods.
Yes, a Heggstad petition can be contested by heirs or other interested parties who dispute the trustmaker’s intent or claim competing ownership rights. Contests may raise questions about the authenticity of documents, the circumstances surrounding the trust’s creation, or claims that the trustmaker lacked capacity. When contested, the proceeding may require additional discovery, witness testimony, and litigation to resolve factual disputes. Preparing for potential contests by collecting clear documentary evidence and credible declarations reduces the risk of prolonged disputes. When objections arise we evaluate the claims and pursue appropriate responses, settlement discussions, or hearings to protect the trust’s position while seeking an efficient resolution that aligns with the trustmaker’s documented intentions.
After the court grants a Heggstad petition, the order declares that the specified property is part of the trust, providing the legal basis for trustees to manage, sell, or transfer the asset under the trust terms. The next step is to record the court order with the county recorder and take any additional steps required by title companies or lenders to update the public record. This recording creates the public documentation that aligns title with the court’s decision. Once the order is recorded, trustees can proceed with transactions such as sale or distribution in accordance with the trust, subject to any liens or encumbrances. We assist clients in coordinating recording and working with title professionals to ensure the order leads to practical results that allow administration to continue smoothly.
Alternatives depend on the circumstances and may include initiating probate, pursuing a quiet title action, or negotiating a direct transfer if all interested parties agree. Probate addresses broader estate administration when multiple assets require court oversight, while a quiet title action can resolve competing claims not tied specifically to trust intent. A negotiated transfer can work when heirs and beneficiaries cooperate and agree to sign documents that effectuate the intended transfer without court involvement. Choosing the best route requires reviewing the trust instruments, the character of the property, and the presence of disputes. We evaluate the costs, timelines, and legal risks of each option so clients can select the approach that best preserves the trustmaker’s plan and serves the needs of beneficiaries and trustees.
To start a Heggstad petition in Cottonwood, gather the trust document, recorded deed, title reports, and any correspondence or draft deeds that reflect the trustmaker’s intent. Contact our office to schedule a consultation to review these materials and discuss evidence that supports the petition. During intake we will outline likely timelines, required witnesses or declarations, and any steps to coordinate with title companies or lenders. After the initial review we prepare the petition and supporting exhibits, handle service on interested parties, and represent clients through the court process. We also coordinate recording and title updates after a favorable order so trustees can act with confidence. Calling us at 408-528-2827 is a practical first step to begin resolving title discrepancies.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas