If you are considering a change to an existing trust in McCloud, a trust modification petition may be the legal path you need. Our firm, Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman, assists clients throughout Siskiyou County and California with petitions to modify trust terms, correct errors, or adapt trust administration to new circumstances. We explain options clearly and help you prepare the necessary documents and court filings. This process can affect beneficiaries, fiduciary duties, and asset distributions, so understanding the procedural steps and likely timelines helps set realistic expectations before you begin.
Modifying a trust often arises when circumstances shift, such as changes in tax law, family dynamics, or trust settlor capacity. In McCloud, residents rely on thoughtful legal guidance to determine whether an informal amendment, trustee consent, or a formal court petition is the right approach. Our team helps clarify whether the trust instrument itself allows modifications, whether all interested parties agree, and when judicial review is necessary. We prioritize clear communication and practical planning so you can pursue a modification that protects your intentions and minimizes disruption to beneficiaries and trustees.
A properly handled trust modification petition can preserve the settlor’s intent, correct drafting mistakes, and adapt trust administration to changed circumstances without undermining beneficiary rights. For McCloud families, modifications can prevent future disputes, clarify unclear provisions, and address matters such as tax planning or incapacity planning. Pursuing this legal step when appropriate reduces later litigation risk and can streamline estate administration. An organized approach that gathers necessary documentation, notifies interested parties, and presents clear legal grounds to the court increases the likelihood of a favorable resolution and long-term peace among beneficiaries.
Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman serves clients in McCloud, San Jose, and across California with a focus on estate planning and trust administration matters including trust modification petitions. Our approach emphasizes careful document review, effective communication with trustees and beneficiaries, and court filings tailored to each client’s circumstances. We assist with drafting pleadings, compiling supporting evidence, and negotiating resolutions when possible. Clients rely on our practical knowledge of California trust law and local court procedures to navigate petitions efficiently while preserving family relationships and achieving durable, legally sound results.
A trust modification petition asks the court to permit changes to a trust instrument when informal methods are unavailable or inadequate. Grounds for petitions include mistake in the trust document, changed circumstances that frustrate the settlor’s intent, or provisions that conflict with current law. In California, a petition may be filed by trustees, beneficiaries, or interested parties, and it often requires notice to all interested persons. The court evaluates whether modification aligns with the settlor’s probable intent or is necessary to achieve the trust’s purpose while protecting beneficiary rights and legal formalities.
The procedural steps for a trust modification petition include evaluating the trust instrument, gathering evidence such as declarations or contemporaneous documents, preparing the petition and supporting exhibits, and serving interested parties following local rules. Hearings may be required where the court examines testimony and legal arguments. Sometimes petitions lead to negotiated settlements before a final order, which can save time and expense. Throughout the process, the focus remains on achieving a result that respects the settlor’s objectives and provides clear direction for trustees and beneficiaries.
A trust modification petition is a formal request to the probate or superior court to change the terms or administration of an existing trust. This remedy is used when the trust document is ambiguous, contains a mistake, or no longer serves the settlor’s intended purpose due to changed circumstances. The court assesses evidence, such as prior drafts, communications, and the trust language, to determine whether modification is appropriate. Petitioners must demonstrate legal and factual grounds for the requested change while ensuring that beneficiaries’ rights are respected and potential conflicts are addressed in a transparent manner.
Successful petitions require a clear statement of the requested modification, supporting factual declarations, citation of applicable law, and full disclosure to interested parties. Petitioners should assemble documentation showing settlor intent, relevant trust provisions, and any events that justify modification. The filing must comply with local practice rules, include proposed orders, and provide adequate notice. The court may request hearings, consider objections, and, if it grants relief, issue an order that often includes revised trust terms or instructions for trustees to implement the change while protecting beneficiary interests.
Understanding common terms used in trust modification petitions helps individuals navigate the process. Key words include settlor, trustee, beneficiary, trust instrument, petition, notice, hearing, and order. Each term carries specific legal meaning in California trust law and can affect the strategy for pursuing a modification. Familiarity with these concepts allows trustees and beneficiaries to evaluate proposed changes more effectively, collaborate on potential solutions, and understand the court’s role in resolving disputes or formalizing agreed-upon adjustments to trust documents.
Settlor refers to the person who created the trust and established its terms. The settlor’s expressed intent is the guiding principle courts use when considering modifications. Evidence of the settlor’s objectives, such as drafts, letters, or contemporaneous statements, can influence a court’s decision. When the settlor is alive but incapacitated, courts assess capacity issues and previously stated intentions. Understanding the settlor’s role is central to modifying a trust because any change should align with what the settlor intended, subject to legal limits and the protection of beneficiaries’ interests.
The trustee is the individual or institution charged with managing trust assets and carrying out the trust’s terms. Trustees have fiduciary duties to beneficiaries, including duties of loyalty and prudence, and must follow court orders related to trust modifications. A trustee may petition for modification to clarify administrative issues or to carry out the settlor’s probable intent. Trustees often work with interested parties to propose modifications that minimize conflict and ensure continued proper management of trust property in accordance with the court’s directives.
A beneficiary is someone who stands to receive benefits from the trust, whether income, principal, or other rights. Beneficiaries must generally receive notice of petitions that affect their interests and may object to proposed changes. Courts weigh beneficiary rights when considering modifications, ensuring that the requested changes do not unfairly prejudice anyone entitled to trust distributions. Clear communication among beneficiaries, trustees, and petitioners can help resolve concerns and reduce the likelihood of contested proceedings that prolong the modification process.
The petition is the written request filed with the court asking for modification, and notice refers to the legal requirement to inform interested parties of the petition and any hearings. Proper notice allows beneficiaries and other interested persons to review the proposed changes and decide whether to support or oppose them. Courts require specific forms of service and deadlines for responses. Failure to provide correct notice can delay proceedings or lead to dismissal, so attention to procedural detail is essential when preparing a petition and serving parties.
When considering changes to a trust, options may include an informal amendment if the trust allows it, trustee and beneficiary agreement, or filing a court petition when disputes or legal obstacles exist. Informal approaches are often quicker and less costly but require clear authority within the trust instrument and unanimous agreement among necessary parties. Trustee consent can resolve administrative issues but may not be valid for fundamental changes. A court petition offers a formal path when agreement cannot be reached or when legal clarity is necessary to preserve the settlor’s intent.
Minor administrative adjustments, such as correcting an address, updating contact information, or clarifying procedural instructions for trustees, can often be handled without a formal court petition. When all affected parties consent and the trust instrument authorizes such changes, simpler documentation or trustee action may suffice. Addressing these small matters promptly and documenting agreements in writing helps avoid future misunderstandings. However, significant changes to distribution terms or beneficiary designations typically cannot be resolved informally and may require stronger legal measures.
If all beneficiaries and the trustee unanimously agree to a proposed modification and the trust instrument permits amendments by consent, they may proceed without involving the court. Such agreements should be carefully documented and legally reviewed to ensure enforceability and to protect all parties’ rights. Even when proceeding by agreement, it is important to follow proper procedures and update trust records to reflect the change. Where unanimity is achievable, negotiation and clear documentation can save time and reduce legal expense compared to a contested petition.
When trust language is ambiguous or beneficiaries disagree about meaning or intent, a court petition provides a structured forum for resolution. Contested provisions often involve disputes over distribution, trustee powers, or conditions precedent, and the court’s interpretation brings legal clarity. Filing a petition enables the presentation of evidence to show the settlor’s probable intent or to correct a drafting error. Legal representation helps ensure that pleadings are persuasive and procedurally sound so that the court can make an informed decision that resolves long-standing uncertainty.
Allegations involving settlor capacity, undue influence, or fraud often make informal resolutions impractical and necessitate a court proceeding to examine evidence and testimony. Courts assess whether the settlor had the mental capacity to create or modify the trust and whether any coercion affected the trust’s terms. A petition allows for discovery, witness statements, and judicial findings that can confirm or set aside challenged provisions. These formal proceedings protect the integrity of the trust process and ensure that outcomes are legally defensible.
A court-based approach to trust modification offers legal finality and a formal record that protects trustees and beneficiaries moving forward. When the court approves a modification, the order clarifies duties and rights, reducing the likelihood of future disputes. For families in McCloud and beyond, this certainty supports smoother trust administration and gives trustees clear authority to act. Courts also provide neutral evaluation of competing claims, which can be especially valuable when emotions run high or when factual complexity requires careful judicial assessment and resolution.
Pursuing a comprehensive legal approach helps ensure compliance with California trust law and local court practice, minimizing procedural risks. The court’s involvement can validate corrective changes to meet tax, incapacity, or administrative needs while offering transparency to interested parties. When parties reach agreement and ask the court to ratify the change, the resulting order provides a durable remedy that trustees can rely upon in carrying out their duties. This formalization preserves relationships by reducing uncertainty and creating a clear framework for future administration.
One major benefit of seeking a court order for modification is legal finality. A judicial determination reduces ambiguity about trust terms and provides enforceable guidance for trustees and beneficiaries. This clarity helps prevent renewed disputes over the same issues and supports efficient administration of trust assets. With a clear court order, trustees can act with confidence, and beneficiaries are more likely to accept the established terms. Finality promotes stability for families and institutions relying on the trust to manage and distribute assets according to a defined plan.
Court involvement protects trustees from future claims by providing authoritative instruction on disputed matters and clarifying permissible actions. Beneficiaries also gain assurance from a formal proceeding that their interests were considered and that changes were legally vetted. This mutual protection reduces the risk of personal liability for trustees and helps beneficiaries understand their rights. A properly executed court order balances competing interests and lays out a roadmap for trust administration, which benefits everyone involved by minimizing confusion and litigation risk going forward.
Collecting documents that reflect the settlor’s intent strengthens a petition. Look for drafts of the trust, letters, emails, medical records, or contemporaneous notes that show what the settlor intended when creating the trust. Statements from witnesses or prior advisors can support a claim that a provision was mistaken or needs clarification. Organizing this material early streamlines preparation of the petition and helps present a coherent narrative to the court. Thorough documentation also aids in resolving objections and persuades interested parties that the proposed change aligns with the settlor’s objectives.
Anticipate the need to present evidence at hearings by preparing witness statements, expert assessments of capacity if relevant, and organized documentary exhibits. Familiarize yourself with local court rules regarding filings, service, and timelines so that procedural errors do not delay your petition. Craft clear proposed orders for the court’s consideration and be ready to explain how the requested modification preserves the settlor’s intent and benefits trust administration. Thorough preparation increases the likelihood of a smooth hearing and a reasoned judicial ruling.
People pursue trust modification petitions for many reasons, including correcting drafting mistakes, adapting to changes in family circumstances, addressing tax planning needs, or resolving ambiguities that hinder administration. In McCloud, changes in property holdings, beneficiary circumstances, or incapacity can make a previously drafted trust impractical or conflicting with the settlor’s original goals. Seeking a judicial modification can provide clarity and legal authority to implement needed adjustments, ensuring that trustees can manage assets according to a plan that reflects current realities while honoring the settlor’s intent.
Other reasons include resolving disputes among beneficiaries, addressing issues of settlor capacity at the time of signing, or mitigating unintended consequences of earlier drafting choices. When interested parties cannot reach agreement or when legal questions about trust interpretation arise, a court petition provides a formal mechanism to determine appropriate relief. Choosing to pursue a petition is often a balancing act between preserving family harmony and obtaining the legal clarity necessary for sensible trust administration going forward, especially where assets and responsibilities are significant.
Common circumstances that prompt petitions include changes in beneficiary status, such as deaths, divorces, or the birth of new beneficiaries; tax or legal changes that affect trust operation; administrative errors; and instances where the settlor’s intent was not clearly recorded. Additionally, concerns about trustee misconduct, incapacity issues, or the discovery of conflicting documents can trigger a petition. Understanding these typical scenarios helps interested parties recognize when modification may be the most appropriate and effective remedy.
Changes like marriage, divorce, births, or deaths can alter the fairness or practicality of existing trust provisions. A modification petition may be necessary to reflect updated family relationships or to address needs such as care for minors or adult beneficiaries with special needs. Adjusting a trust in response to life events ensures that the document remains aligned with the settlor’s revised intentions and the current realities of beneficiaries’ lives. Proactive adjustments can prevent disputes later and make trust administration more straightforward for trustees.
Drafting errors, typographical mistakes, or ambiguous clauses within a trust can create confusion about distribution or trustee powers. Where the wording does not reflect what the settlor intended, a petition can correct the record and provide clarity. Courts will consider extrinsic evidence to determine the probable intent and may grant modifications that align the trust language with that intent. Correcting such issues through the court helps prevent differing interpretations and future litigation among beneficiaries and trustees.
Shifts in tax law or regulatory requirements can make existing trust terms inefficient or noncompliant. A petition allows courts to authorize changes that accommodate new legal landscapes while preserving the settlor’s essential objectives. Trustees and beneficiaries may seek modifications to maintain tax advantages, clarify beneficiary entitlements under updated statutes, or restructure administrative provisions. Addressing these issues through a formal petition creates legal certainty and helps trustees implement plans that respond to the current legal environment.
Although our main office is in San Jose, Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman assists clients in McCloud and Siskiyou County with trust modification petitions and related estate planning matters. We handle petition preparation, evidence gathering, trustee coordination, and court filings while keeping clients informed at every step. Our services include reviewing trust documents such as revocable living trusts, pour-over wills, certification of trust, and related instruments to determine the best path to achieve client goals through negotiated solutions or court petitions when necessary.
Clients choose our firm for careful legal analysis, thorough preparation of petitions, and responsive communication throughout the process. We focus on understanding each client’s objectives and gathering the necessary documentary support to present a persuasive case to the court. Our approach emphasizes realistic planning, early engagement with interested parties, and clear advice on likely outcomes. Clients benefit from a service that prioritizes practical solutions and preserves family relationships while pursuing necessary legal changes to trust instruments.
We also provide support for related estate planning needs that often arise during modification proceedings, including updates to wills, powers of attorney, advance health care directives, and trust administration documents. Coordinating these elements helps create a coherent estate plan that reflects current circumstances and reduces the need for additional changes later. By addressing trust modification and complementary planning tasks together, clients gain a more complete, durable solution that fits their personal and financial goals.
Our representation includes preparing all required court filings, advising on notice and service to beneficiaries, and presenting proposed orders for court approval. We assist trustees in understanding their duties after modification and in taking necessary administrative steps to implement approved changes. Whether pursuing a negotiated resolution or advancing a formal petition, we work to achieve results that provide legal clarity and a manageable path forward for trustees and beneficiaries alike.
Our process begins with an initial review of the trust instrument and related documents to determine the appropriate path for modification. We gather evidence such as prior drafts, correspondence, and witness statements, and assess legal grounds for the requested change. After preparing a petition and supporting exhibits, we handle service to interested parties and coordinate any negotiations. If a hearing is necessary, we prepare clear, organized presentations for the court. Throughout, we keep clients apprised of timelines, costs, and realistic expectations to ensure an informed decision-making process.
The initial stage involves a thorough review of the trust instrument, related planning documents, and any communications that shed light on the settlor’s intent. We identify potential legal grounds for modification and outline options such as informal amendment, trustee consent, or a court petition. This stage includes gathering evidence and determining which interested parties must be notified. Establishing a clear strategy early helps control costs and improves the likelihood of an efficient resolution that aligns with the settlor’s goals.
Collecting and analyzing all relevant documents is essential to present a coherent case. This may include the original trust, any amendments, draft versions, correspondence with advisors, medical records if capacity is at issue, and financial statements that relate to trust administration. Carefully organized exhibits make the petition more persuasive and facilitate discussion with trustees and beneficiaries. This preparation also helps identify potential objections and allows us to address weaknesses proactively through additional evidence or negotiation.
Identifying and notifying all interested parties is a legal requirement and a practical necessity for an orderly process. We determine who must receive notice under California law, prepare required service documents, and advise on methods to provide effective communication. Ensuring proper notice prevents procedural defects that could delay proceedings and gives beneficiaries an opportunity to respond. Early engagement with interested parties can also reveal opportunities for agreement that avoid contested hearings and streamline the path to a final order.
After assembling the petition and supporting exhibits, we file with the appropriate probate or superior court and arrange for service on interested parties per statutory requirements. We prepare proposed orders and notices and track response deadlines. Filing triggers the formal period during which beneficiaries may object or agree. If parties express willingness to resolve issues cooperatively, we may present a stipulated order. Otherwise, we proceed to prepare for hearings, engage in discovery if necessary, and continue to refine legal arguments based on responses received.
Filing requires attention to detail in pleadings, preparation of exhibits, and compliance with court formatting and procedural rules. We draft a clear petition that presents factual support and legal authority for the requested modification, attach necessary evidence, and include proposed orders for the court’s consideration. Properly drafted documents reduce the chance of procedural rejection and help the court quickly understand the relief sought. We also monitor court calendars to ensure timely scheduling of hearings and deadlines.
Service of the petition on beneficiaries and other interested persons follows statutory rules to ensure everyone has notice. After service, parties have an opportunity to respond, object, or stipulate. We track timelines for responses and handle correspondence and negotiations with opposing parties. If objections arise, we evaluate their merits and prepare replies or amended petitions as necessary. Managing this phase effectively can narrow disputes and sometimes lead to agreements that reduce the need for contested hearings.
If the court schedules a hearing, we present evidence and legal argument to support the requested modification and respond to objections. The court may issue an order approving the modification, clarifying trust terms, or directing specific administrative steps. Once an order is entered, we assist trustees in implementing changes, updating trust records, and communicating the outcome to beneficiaries. Ensuring compliance with the court’s directives helps prevent future challenges and facilitates smooth trust administration after modification.
At hearings, organized presentation of documentary evidence and witness statements is vital. We prepare declarations that explain the factual basis for the modification, coordinate witness testimony if needed, and present legal authorities supporting the requested relief. A clear, focused hearing helps the court evaluate whether the modification aligns with the settlor’s intent and serves trust purposes. Effective courtroom preparation makes it easier to address objections and secure a thoughtful ruling that the parties can follow moving forward.
After the court issues an order, trustees must take practical steps such as amending trust records, notifying financial institutions, updating asset titles if required, and distributing assets according to revised terms. We help implement these administrative steps and advise trustees on compliance with any conditions imposed by the court. Proper execution of the order reduces the risk of later disputes and provides beneficiaries with a clear understanding of how the trust will operate following modification.
A trust modification petition is a formal request filed in probate or superior court asking for an order to change the terms or administration of an existing trust. Petitioners typically seek modifications when the trust instrument is ambiguous, contains mistakes, or no longer accomplishes the settlor’s intended purpose because of changed circumstances. Interested persons such as trustees or beneficiaries may file petitions, and the court considers evidence to determine whether modification is consistent with the settlor’s probable intent and legal standards. The court evaluates the petition based on the evidence presented, which can include trust drafts, communications, and witness statements. The process requires proper notice to interested parties and adherence to procedural rules. If parties agree to a modification, the court can approve a stipulated order; if there is disagreement, the court will review testimony and documents during a hearing and issue a ruling that clarifies trust terms and instructs trustees on implementation.
The timeline for resolving a trust modification petition varies depending on the complexity of the issues, the number of interested parties, and whether objections arise. Simple agreed petitions that involve minimal notice and no disputes can be resolved relatively quickly, sometimes within a few months. More complex or contested matters, particularly those involving capacity claims or allegations of undue influence, can take significantly longer due to discovery, hearings, and legal briefing requirements. Local court calendars and procedural requirements also affect timing. Preparing the petition carefully, ensuring proper notice, and seeking stipulations when possible can shorten the process. Conversely, contested proceedings with multiple objections or complicated factual disputes will extend the timeline and require more extensive preparation and court appearances before a final order is entered.
Evidence to support a modification petition typically includes documents that reflect the settlor’s intent, such as earlier drafts of the trust, letters, emails, financial records, and contemporaneous notes. Medical records or physician statements may be relevant if capacity is an issue. Declarations from witnesses who were present during the trust’s creation or who discussed the settlor’s intentions can be persuasive. Compiling organized, credible evidence helps the court understand why the requested change aligns with the settlor’s objectives. In contested cases, the court may permit depositions or additional discovery to evaluate claims such as undue influence or fraud. Presenting clear, corroborated documentation along with coherent legal argument increases the likelihood that the court will approve a modification consistent with the trust’s purpose and the settlor’s probable intent.
Yes, beneficiaries have the right to object to a proposed trust modification because their interests may be affected by changes to distributions or trustee powers. Proper notice is required so beneficiaries can review the petition and decide whether to support, oppose, or seek modifications themselves. Objections often raise issues such as alleged drafting errors, capacity concerns, or disagreements about the settlor’s intent, and the court considers these objections as part of the adjudication process. When beneficiaries object, the proceeding may move from an uncontested, administrative matter to a contested hearing in which evidence is presented and the court makes findings. Objecting parties should prepare to support their positions with documents and witness statements, while petitioners must address objections through pleadings and demonstrations that the requested modification is legally justified and consistent with the settlor’s purposes.
Not always. Whether a hearing is required depends on the nature of the petition, local court practices, and whether interested parties object. If all interested persons stipulate to the requested change and the court finds the stipulated modification appropriate, the court may enter an order without a contested hearing. Agreed orders are common when parties reach a consensus and the requested changes are straightforward. However, when objections arise, or when factual questions such as capacity, undue influence, or fraud are presented, the court will typically schedule a hearing to evaluate evidence and testimony. In those circumstances, both sides present declarations and supporting exhibits, and the judge makes findings before ruling on the modification request.
Costs for a trust modification petition in California vary with the complexity of the matter, attorney time required, court filing fees, and whether the petition is contested. Simple, agreed modifications may incur modest filing fees and limited professional time, while contested matters with discovery, depositions, and multiple court appearances are substantially more expensive. Specific cost estimates depend on document preparation needs, potential expert involvement, and the extent of negotiations required to resolve disputes. Planning and early communication among parties can reduce overall expense by encouraging stipulations or limited hearings. We provide transparent guidance about likely costs and strategies to control expenses while pursuing necessary legal changes. Understanding the potential range of fees at the outset helps clients make informed decisions about whether to pursue a petition or seek alternative approaches.
Yes, trusts can often be modified after the settlor’s death, though the legal standard differs from modifications while the settlor is alive. Post-death modifications typically require a showing that the trust terms should be reformed to reflect the settlor’s actual intent, correct mistakes, or address circumstances that frustrate the trust’s purpose. The process usually involves filing a petition and providing evidence such as drafts, correspondence, or other materials that demonstrate what the settlor intended when creating the trust. Courts are cautious in approving post-death modifications, as the settlor cannot clarify intent through testimony. Therefore, stronger documentary support and clear legal reasoning are necessary to persuade the court. When beneficiaries agree, submitting a stipulated order can streamline the process, but contested cases require careful presentation of evidence to obtain court approval for changes after the settlor’s death.
During a modification proceeding, trustees generally continue to have fiduciary duties to manage trust assets prudently and in accordance with existing trust terms until an order modifies those terms. Trustees must avoid unilateral actions that alter beneficiary interests without proper authority. While the petition is pending, trustees should seek guidance and, when appropriate, consult with counsel to ensure decisions comply with duties and to avoid exposing themselves to potential liability. If the court issues a modification order, trustees must follow the court’s directives and implement changes as ordered. Trustees may also request court instructions or interim orders when uncertainty about administrative actions exists, which helps protect trustees from later claims. Clear communication with beneficiaries and adherence to court orders maintain proper trust administration throughout the process.
Alternatives to filing a court petition include informal amendment if the trust instrument allows it, obtaining unanimous consent from beneficiaries and trustees, or attempting mediation to reach a settlement. When parties can agree, documenting the change and obtaining a court ratification via a stipulated order can sometimes be a more efficient route. Informal approaches reduce cost and time but require legal sufficiency in the trust document and full cooperation among interested persons. Mediation or negotiated settlements can resolve disputes without full litigation and often preserve relationships. However, when unanimity is not possible or when legal problems such as mistakes or incapacity are at issue, a formal petition provides a definitive legal remedy. Choosing the best path depends on the circumstances, the trust’s language, and the parties’ willingness to cooperate.
Preparing to support a petition involves gathering all relevant documents that shed light on the settlor’s intent, including original trust documents, drafts, correspondence, and any records reflecting discussions with advisors. Obtain declarations from witnesses who can speak to the settlor’s objectives, and compile financial and medical records if they are relevant to capacity or administration issues. Organized exhibits and a clear narrative make it easier for the court to understand the requested modification and the reasons behind it. Engage with interested parties early to explore possible agreements and to identify likely objections. Working collaboratively when possible can reduce costs and lead to stipulated orders. When litigation is necessary, thorough preparation, accurate notice, and credible documentary support increase the petition’s chances of success and help the court reach a reasoned determination that aligns with the settlor’s intent.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas