A Heggstad petition can be an essential tool when assets intended for a revocable living trust were never properly transferred before a person died. This page explains how the Heggstad process works in Yreka and Siskiyou County, and how the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman approaches these matters in California. We focus on practical steps to determine whether property should be treated as trust property, how to prepare the required documents, and the likely court procedures. If you are dealing with a decedent’s estate where a trust exists but title to assets was not changed, this guide helps clarify options and next steps.
When a decedent had a trust and supporting estate planning documents like a pour-over will or certification of trust, but assets remain in the decedent’s name, family members often face confusion about whether those assets pass under the trust or through probate. A Heggstad petition asks the court to treat such assets as trust property based on the decedent’s intent and the existence of supporting documents. This page outlines who can file, typical evidence courts consider, the potential timeline, and practical ways to resolve common funding errors while minimizing delay and expense for heirs and fiduciaries.
Filing a Heggstad petition can preserve the transfer plan the decedent set out in their trust, potentially avoiding full probate administration and ensuring assets are managed and distributed according to the trust terms. The petition helps clarify ownership when title problems or oversights left assets out of the trust. Beyond confirming that property belongs to the trust, the court’s determination can speed asset distribution, reduce administration costs, and provide clear authority to successor trustees. This process also supports beneficiaries who rely on trust provisions for guardianship nominations, special needs provisions, or pet trusts to be honored as intended by the deceased.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provides estate planning and trust administration services from San Jose and assists clients throughout California, including matters in Siskiyou County and Yreka. Our practice handles trust‑funding problems, petitions to the court, and related estate documents such as revocable living trusts, pour‑over wills, and certifications of trust. We focus on clear communication, timely filings, and thorough preparation of the evidence courts need to grant a Heggstad petition. Clients receive guidance on assembling documents, preparing declarations, and coordinating with banks, title companies, and successor trustees to implement post‑death funding solutions.
A Heggstad petition is a court action designed to establish that certain assets belong to a trust even if the title was never changed before the decedent’s death. Under California law, the petition relies on documentary and circumstantial evidence showing the decedent intended the property to be trust property. Typical evidence includes the trust document itself, pour‑over wills, statements of intent, declarations from those who handled the decedent’s affairs, and contemporaneous records related to the asset. Understanding the types of evidence the court will consider is a key first step for a trustee or family member seeking a favorable ruling.
Not every funding problem requires a Heggstad petition; sometimes a transfer can be completed through nonjudicial means such as completing beneficiary designations or obtaining bank affidavits. However, when title issues are contested or when financial institutions insist on clear court authority, a Heggstad filing becomes the practical route to legal recognition of trust ownership. The petition process typically involves drafting the petition and supporting declarations, serving interested parties, and presenting the matter to the probate court for review. Knowing the procedural steps and typical timelines helps trustees plan for administration and distribution.
In California, a Heggstad petition asks the probate court to treat specific property as part of a decedent’s revocable trust despite the absence of record title in the trust name. The petition is usually brought by the successor trustee or personal representative and relies on evidence demonstrating that the decedent intended the asset to be governed by the trust. Courts evaluate the credibility of documents and witness statements, the existence of related estate planning instruments like pour‑over wills, and the circumstances surrounding ownership and control. A successful petition results in an order confirming trust ownership so the trustee can manage or distribute the asset under trust terms.
When preparing a Heggstad petition, gather evidence such as the trust document, pour‑over will, bank or title records, communications showing intent, and witness declarations. The petition should identify the property, explain why it was not retitled, and show why the court should treat it as trust property. Courts consider whether transferring title to the trust would reflect the decedent’s intent and whether doing so is fair to interested parties. After filing, parties are served and the court may set a hearing or decide on submitted records. The order, if granted, allows the trustee to administer the asset under the trust terms.
Understanding certain terms helps beneficiaries and fiduciaries navigate post‑death trust funding matters. Below are concise definitions of common words used in trust funding and Heggstad matters so that individuals can better interpret court documents, petitions, and communications with financial institutions. These definitions reflect how terms are commonly applied in California probate practice and in petitions asking courts to recognize assets as trust property when record title does not reflect the trust.
A Heggstad petition is a Probate Court filing that requests a judicial declaration treating specific decedent property as belonging to a revocable trust even though the title was not retitled before death. The petition presents evidence that the decedent intended the trust to control the asset, such as a trust agreement, pour‑over will, and witness statements. When the court grants the petition, an order confirms the asset as trust property, allowing the trustee to handle it according to the trust’s terms and avoiding separate probate for that asset when possible.
A pour‑over will is a testamentary document that directs any assets remaining in a decedent’s name at death to be transferred into their revocable trust. It acts as a safety net for unfunded assets, so the trust ultimately governs their distribution. While a pour‑over will can funnel property to the trust, a Heggstad petition may still be needed when banks or title companies require a court order to recognize the trust’s claim to specific assets. The pour‑over will supports the argument that the decedent intended the trust to control the property.
A certification of trust is a shortened, summary document that confirms the existence of a trust and identifies the trustee and key powers without revealing the trust’s private terms. Financial institutions often accept a certification of trust as proof of a trustee’s authority to manage trust assets. When assets were not retitled before death, a certification can be included with a Heggstad petition to show the court and third parties that the trust existed and that the named trustee is authorized to act on behalf of the trust.
Trust funding refers to the process of transferring title, beneficiary designations, or account ownership into the name of a revocable living trust so that the trust controls those assets during life and after death. Proper funding reduces the need for probate and helps ensure assets are distributed per the trust’s terms. When funding is incomplete at death, a Heggstad petition or other court proceedings may be necessary to resolve ownership and allow the trustee to administer the assets as the decedent intended.
When assets remain outside a trust, there are different legal paths to resolve ownership and distribution. A Heggstad petition asks the probate court to declare that specific assets are trust property based on evidence of the decedent’s intent. Probate proceedings address assets titled in the decedent’s name without reliance on the trust and can be lengthier and more public. Nonjudicial alternatives include obtaining bank affidavits or working with title companies when institutions accept the trust and supporting documents. Choosing the right path depends on the nature of the asset, institutional requirements, potential disputes among heirs, and the trustee’s authority.
If the asset in question is modest in value and the financial institution or title company is willing to accept a certification of trust and supporting affidavit, a nonjudicial transfer can be completed without court involvement. This approach can be faster and less expensive than filing a petition. Trustees should document the decedent’s intent with available records and communications, confirm institutional requirements, and obtain written acceptance from the institution to avoid future disputes. A measured, well‑documented nonjudicial transfer often resolves funding oversights efficiently while keeping costs down for beneficiaries and fiduciaries.
When beneficiaries and potential heirs agree that the property should be treated as trust property and sign supporting declarations or waivers, trustees may be able to complete a transfer without court involvement. Voluntary cooperation from interested parties reduces the likelihood of contested proceedings and helps streamline administration. Trustees should obtain written releases or consents, keep clear records of the agreements reached, and ensure that any institutional requirements are met. Even when there is consensus, obtaining formal acknowledgements in writing is important to prevent later disputes or claims requiring judicial resolution.
If beneficiaries dispute ownership, family members contest the trust’s terms, or title issues are complicated by multiple owners or liens, filing a Heggstad petition and pursuing court review may be the prudent path. Comprehensive legal services include detailed evidence gathering, drafting declarations, handling service of process, and representing the trustee at hearings. Courts are better positioned to resolve contested claims and provide a binding order that clarifies ownership, which can protect trustees and beneficiaries from future litigation over the same assets.
Many banks, title companies, and county recorders require a court order to transfer or retitle assets when records do not show trust ownership. In such situations, filing a Heggstad petition yields the judicial authority these institutions demand. Comprehensive handling ensures the petition is supported by admissible proof and that procedural steps are followed to satisfy court rules and institutional requirements. This approach can prevent costly delays and ensure the trustee receives clear authority to manage, sell, or distribute the asset in accordance with the trust.
A comprehensive approach that includes filing a Heggstad petition can provide a final, enforceable determination of ownership that removes ambiguity and reduces the risk of future litigation. When the court issues an order confirming trust ownership, third parties such as banks and title companies accept that determination, enabling smoother administration. This path can be particularly important for high‑value assets, property subject to liens, or assets with complex ownership histories that would otherwise lead to protracted disputes or repeated challenges by heirs or creditors.
Comprehensive representation also helps ensure that fiduciaries meet procedural requirements, deadlines, and notice obligations, shielding trustees from personal liability and providing confidence to beneficiaries. Thorough preparation typically includes assembling documentary evidence, drafting clear declarations, and anticipating likely objections. By investing time at the outset to build a complete record, trustees and fiduciaries increase the chance of prompt judicial approval, minimize administrative delays, and facilitate orderly distribution of trust assets in accordance with the decedent’s intentions.
When a court grants a Heggstad petition, the resulting order gives the trustee clear legal authority to manage, sell, or distribute the identified asset as part of the trust. This authority is valuable when third parties require formal proof of title or when beneficiaries need an enforceable determination. Clear judicial authority reduces friction with banks, county recorders, and other institutions, enabling trustees to carry out their duties efficiently and with less risk of later disputes or creditor claims challenging the trustee’s decisions regarding the asset.
A binding court order confirming trust ownership decreases the likelihood of future challenges from heirs or creditors that could reopen asset distribution matters. Having the court reconcile title issues based on a full evidentiary record makes it harder for interested parties to contest the trustee’s actions later. This stability benefits all parties by providing a predictable path for administration and closing the decedent’s estate matters more securely, which can save time and costs that otherwise might be spent defending against subsequent claims.
Gathering clear documentary evidence makes a Heggstad petition more persuasive and can shorten court review. Useful materials include the trust document, pour‑over will, recent bank statements, title or deed records, beneficiary designation forms, and correspondence that reflects the decedent’s intent to place assets in the trust. Declarations from those who assisted the decedent with financial affairs or witnessed signing of documents are helpful. Organizing this evidence chronologically and explaining how each item supports the claim that the asset was intended for the trust will strengthen the petition and reduce back‑and‑forth with the court or opposing parties.
Identify and notify likely interested parties so the petition process proceeds smoothly and avoids surprises. Proper notice to beneficiaries, heirs, and creditors is generally required, and early communication can reduce the chance of objections. Anticipate typical disputes such as claims of joint ownership, conflicting beneficiary designations, or competing wills by checking records and speaking with involved family members when appropriate. Documenting efforts to provide notice and resolve disagreements shows the court the trustee is acting responsibly and in good faith, which can support a favorable outcome.
Consider a Heggstad petition when an asset intended for a revocable trust remains titled in the decedent’s name and a straightforward administrative transfer is unlikely or impossible. This includes real property with recorded title in the decedent’s name, bank or brokerage accounts that will not retitle without a court order, or situations where beneficiaries dispute whether the asset belongs to the trust. Filing a petition can create a clear legal record that the asset should be administered under trust terms rather than subject to probate distribution, which can align outcomes with the decedent’s estate plan.
A petition may also be appropriate when financial institutions insist on judicial authority for transfers or when property values justify the cost of court proceedings. For trustees seeking to minimize future liability and ensure compliance with fiduciary duties, obtaining a court order can provide the certainty needed to take actions such as selling property, transferring title, or distributing proceeds. Ultimately, the decision to file balances the asset’s value, the complexity of ownership, the potential for disputes, and the desire to follow the decedent’s stated intentions.
Common circumstances include oversight where the decedent failed to retitle real estate or accounts, reliance on beneficiary designations that conflict with trust terms, assets acquired shortly before death that were not added to the trust, or institutional refusals to accept nonjudicial documentation. Another frequent scenario involves assets listed in a pour‑over will but still subject to separate probate unless the court recognizes them as trust property. These situations require careful review of records, identification of interested parties, and preparing a persuasive petition and supporting declarations.
Real estate or vehicle titles that were never changed to the name of the trust are common triggers for a Heggstad petition. Even where a decedent created a trust and intended property to be part of it, failure to record a deed or change title prevents trustees from acting on the asset’s behalf. A petition identifies the property, explains the decedent’s intent, and requests an order treating the item as trust property. The court then evaluates the documentation and testimony to decide whether the trust should control the asset.
Sometimes retirement accounts, life insurance policies, or bank accounts have beneficiary designations that do not align with the trust, or they lack beneficiary updates after the trust was created. Where beneficiary designations conflict with the trust or where institutions do not accept the trust documentation, a Heggstad petition can help clarify which assets should pass under the trust. The petition outlines the relationship between beneficiary forms and the estate plan and seeks a judicial ruling consistent with the decedent’s broader intentions.
Assets acquired shortly before the decedent’s death often remain in the decedent’s name because there was not enough time to retitle them into the trust. These include recently purchased real property, bank accounts, or investment holdings. Because the decedent likely intended these assets to be included in the overall estate plan, a Heggstad petition can present that intent and the supporting records to the court. Timely actions by the trustee, backed by documentation, help the court make a determination aligned with the decedent’s plan.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman assists clients in California, including matters arising in Yreka and Siskiyou County, with trust funding issues and Heggstad petitions. We help trustees and family members gather the required documentation, draft petitions and declarations, coordinate service on interested parties, and navigate probate court procedures. Our goal is to provide clear guidance on whether a judicial petition is necessary, how to assemble persuasive evidence, and the practical steps for obtaining an order that allows trust administration to proceed efficiently and in accordance with the decedent’s intent.
We focus on helping clients resolve trust funding problems with careful document preparation, timely court filings, and clear communication with financial institutions and interested parties. Our approach emphasizes building a complete record that explains the decedent’s intent, identifying and notifying heirs, and reducing the risk of contested litigation. For trustees who need to act prudently and in compliance with fiduciary duties, we provide practical direction on gathering evidence and meeting procedural requirements that support a favorable court determination and efficient trust administration.
When institutions require judicial authority to transfer or retitle assets, we prepare petitions and supporting declarations that explain the legal and factual basis for treating property as trust assets. We also help trustees anticipate potential objections and structure pleadings to address likely concerns. By coordinating with banks, title companies, and county offices, we aim to minimize administrative delays after receiving a court order. Our priority is to secure a clear path for trustees to manage and distribute trust assets according to the decedent’s plan.
We also assist with related estate planning documents frequently involved in Heggstad matters, such as revocable living trusts, pour‑over wills, certifications of trust, financial powers of attorney, and advance health care directives. This comprehensive view helps identify planning gaps that may have caused funding problems and offers practical solutions to avoid similar issues in the future. The firm provides hands‑on support to trustees and families during a sensitive time, ensuring procedures are followed and that distributions align with the decedent’s intent.
Our process begins with an intake to identify the asset, review the trust and related documents, and assess whether a Heggstad petition is the appropriate remedy. We then gather records, draft the petition and supporting declarations, and prepare required notices for interested parties. After filing with the probate court, we handle service, monitor any responses or objections, and appear at hearings if necessary. Throughout, we coordinate with institutions to determine post‑order steps for retitling or distribution, aiming to complete administration with minimal delay and expense.
The initial stage focuses on evaluating the asset, reviewing the trust and pour‑over will, and identifying the documents needed to support the petition. We request bank statements, deeds, beneficiary forms, and any correspondence or notes indicating the decedent’s intent. We also identify and list interested parties who must receive notice. This thorough document collection phase ensures the petition is based on a well‑organized evidentiary record and helps anticipate potential objections or institutional requests that could affect the case’s timeline.
We carefully review the trust instrument, pour‑over will, certification of trust, powers of attorney, and any amendments or schedules to determine whether the decedent’s intent to include the asset is clearly reflected. This review helps shape the petition’s narrative and pinpoints the best documentary evidence to present to the court. When gaps exist, we look for corroborating records such as transaction histories, communications with advisors, or witness recollections that collectively show the decedent intended the asset to be controlled by the trust.
Proper notice to beneficiaries, heirs, and creditors is a critical procedural requirement. We identify all interested parties, prepare required notices and proof of service forms, and ensure that those who must receive notice do so in accordance with court rules. Timely and accurate notice reduces later procedural challenges and ensures the petition proceeds on a secure procedural footing. Documentation of notice efforts also demonstrates to the court that the trustee is fulfilling fiduciary duties while seeking a judicial determination.
In the second stage we draft a clear, evidence‑based petition and supporting declarations that explain why the court should treat the asset as trust property. The petition identifies the asset, explains the factual circumstances of the funding omission, and attaches relevant documentary evidence. We handle filing with the probate court, prepare the required proof of service, and confirm the court’s scheduling priorities. This stage focuses on presenting a coherent legal and factual case to encourage a timely ruling.
Supporting declarations from the trustee, family members, or professionals can show the decedent’s instructions, signing of the trust, or efforts to fund the trust before death. We draft declarations that set out facts clearly and attach documentary exhibits such as deeds, account statements, or emails. The goal is to create a persuasive record that links the decedent’s intent to the asset in question. Properly formatted declarations and authenticated exhibits increase the petition’s chance of being resolved favorably without protracted litigation.
After preparing the petition and exhibits, we file the documents with the probate court and serve all required parties. We then monitor the court’s calendar, respond to any procedural requests, and handle any motions or continuances. If the matter is contested, we prepare for a hearing and assemble witness testimony as needed. If uncontested, we provide the court with the documentation necessary for an order. We also coordinate with banks or title companies to ensure the court’s order will be accepted for subsequent retitling or transfers.
Once the court grants the Heggstad petition, the order recognizes the asset as trust property and authorizes the trustee to manage, transfer, or distribute it according to the trust. We assist in obtaining certified copies of the order and provide them to banks, title companies, or county recorders to effect retitling or transfers. This stage may also include handling account distributions, preparing deeds, or coordinating sales. Our goal is to implement the court order quickly to complete administration and allow beneficiaries to receive their distributions.
After the court issues an order, we obtain certified copies and deliver them to the institutions that require proof of judicial determination. We prepare any additional documents needed for retitling or sale, such as trustee affidavits or deeds, and ensure that institutional requirements are satisfied. Clear communication with the institution and precise documentation prevent delays and allow the trustee to move forward with management, sale, or distribution of the asset under the trust’s terms, in keeping with the decedent’s intentions.
Once transfers or distributions are completed, we assist the trustee with final accounting, documentation of distributions to beneficiaries, and closing steps necessary for trust administration. If property is sold, we ensure proceeds are handled per the trust and that any outstanding debts or liens are resolved. The final phase ensures the trustee has fulfilled duties and that beneficiaries receive clear documentation of how the asset was handled, which helps prevent future disputes and provides a complete administrative record for the trust.
A Heggstad petition is a probate court filing that asks the judge to declare certain assets owned by a decedent should be treated as part of the decedent’s revocable trust even though title was not changed before death. The petition relies on documentary and testimonial evidence showing the decedent intended the trust to govern the asset. It is commonly used when institutions require a court order to retitle property or when the asset’s ownership is in doubt and a clear judicial determination is needed to allow the trustee to act. The petition typically identifies the asset, sets out facts explaining why it was not retitled, and attaches supporting documents such as the trust instrument, pour‑over will, account statements, deeds, or witness declarations. If the court is satisfied that the decedent intended the asset to be part of the trust, it issues an order confirming trust ownership, which allows the trustee to manage or distribute the asset under the trust’s terms rather than through a separate probate proceeding.
In California, a successor trustee or the personal representative of the estate may initiate a Heggstad petition to have specific property recognized as trust property. The petitioner needs to demonstrate standing and to serve notice on interested parties, including beneficiaries and heirs who may be affected. The trustee’s role is to present the evidence that supports treating the property as part of the trust, while ensuring proper notice and compliance with court procedures to avoid later procedural challenges. When multiple trustees or co‑trustees exist, the petition should reflect proper authority and signatures as required by the trust. If there are disputes about who has authority, the court may address those matters as part of related proceedings. Timely coordination with heirs and clear documentation of the trustee’s appointment and authority helps the petition move forward without unnecessary delay.
Courts review the trust document, pour‑over will, deeds, account statements, and any contemporaneous communications showing the decedent’s intent to include the asset in the trust. Declarations from individuals who assisted with the decedent’s financial affairs or who witnessed signing can be persuasive. The more direct the documentary link between the trust and the asset, the stronger the petition’s likelihood of success. Courts evaluate the totality of the evidence to determine whether treating the property as trust property aligns with the decedent’s intent. Other helpful items include financial records that show payments related to the property from trust accounts, receipts for transfers that were attempted but not completed, and any schedules or trust amendments referencing the asset. Presenting a logical narrative supported by dated documents helps the court understand why the asset should be administered under the trust rather than through probate.
The timeline for resolving a Heggstad petition varies depending on court schedules, whether the matter is contested, and the complexity of evidence and notice issues. An uncontested petition with clear documentary support may be resolved in a few months, while contested cases or those requiring extensive discovery can take significantly longer. Probate court processing times also vary by county, so local calendar factors in Siskiyou County and Yreka will influence the schedule. To expedite matters, petitioners should prepare a complete evidentiary record, serve interested parties promptly, and respond quickly to any procedural requirements or requests for additional information. Early communication with financial institutions about their documentation needs can also reduce post‑order delays in retitling or transferring assets.
A successful Heggstad petition can avoid separate probate for the asset(s) the court declares to be trust property, since they will be administered under the trust rather than through the decedent’s probate estate. However, filing a petition does not alter the need for probate for other assets that remain outside the trust. Whether probate is needed at all depends on the entire estate profile and the values and nature of assets not governed by the trust or beneficiary designations. The petition’s practical effect is to place the identified assets within the trust administration, which can streamline distribution for those items. Trustees should still review the full inventory of estate assets to determine whether additional probate proceedings are required for property that cannot be included under the trust without court intervention.
Common objections to Heggstad petitions arise from parties who claim the asset was not intended for the trust, who assert competing ownership interests, or who challenge the authenticity or sufficiency of the supporting evidence. Disputes may focus on contradictory beneficiary designations, joint tenancy claims, or allegations that the decedent’s intent is unclear. When objections are raised, the court evaluates the competing evidence and may require further testimony or documentation. Addressing likely objections in the petition, such as by providing contemporaneous records and clear witness declarations, helps reduce the chance of a contested hearing. Trustees should collect robust evidence and consider negotiating with interested parties to resolve disputes before a hearing whenever possible to save time and expense.
Yes. Heggstad petitions can apply to a wide range of assets including real property, bank and brokerage accounts, and other titled property that remains in the decedent’s name. The petition must identify each asset precisely and explain why the asset should be treated as trust property. For real property, this often involves presenting the deed, trust documents, and any other records showing the decedent’s plan to place the property in the trust. For bank or brokerage accounts, statements, beneficiary forms, and communications with the institution can support the petition. Because institutions sometimes have specific requirements for retitling or distribution, obtaining a court order can provide the authority they need to release or retitle the assets to the trustee for administration under the trust.
Costs for a Heggstad petition depend on factors such as the complexity of the evidence, the number of assets involved, court filing fees, and whether the matter is contested. An uncontested petition with clear documentation will generally be less costly than one requiring extensive discovery, multiple hearings, or litigation. Additional expenses may include fees for obtaining certified copies of documents, deed preparation, and title company or recording fees when retitling real property. Because each situation differs, we provide an initial evaluation to estimate likely costs and outline potential fee structures. Planning ahead by gathering documents and coordinating with institutions can help contain expenses and prevent the need for repeated filings or extended court proceedings.
A pour‑over will directs assets in a decedent’s probate estate to the trust, but it does not by itself retitle property or guarantee nonprobate transfer. If assets remain in the decedent’s name, the pour‑over will can support a claim that the decedent intended the trust to control those assets, but a Heggstad petition or probate process may still be required to effect transfer. The will’s existence is helpful evidence, but courts typically look for additional corroboration linking the asset to the trust. Because institutions often require clear authority to transfer or retitle assets, relying solely on a pour‑over will may not satisfy banks or title companies. A Heggstad petition can present the pour‑over will alongside other documentation to obtain a judicial order recognizing the assets as trust property and enabling the trustee to complete necessary transfers.
If a successor trustee discovers unfunded assets, the first priority is to inventory the asset, locate the trust instrument and related documents, and determine whether a nonjudicial transfer is possible. Contact the financial institution or title company to learn their requirements for retitling or releasing the asset to the trustee. Early communication and documentation requests will clarify whether a Heggstad petition or other court action is necessary to obtain transfer authority. At the same time, identify and notify interested parties, preserve records that demonstrate the decedent’s intent, and avoid making unilateral distributions until title and authority are clear. Consulting with counsel can help evaluate options, prepare any needed petitions, and ensure the trustee acts in accordance with fiduciary duties while working to resolve funding oversights promptly.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas