A Heggstad petition can be a vital tool when a deceased grantor named assets to a trust but property title did not transfer before death. In Allendale and throughout Solano County, families often face delays and uncertainty because ownership paperwork was not completed. This guide explains what a Heggstad petition does, how it works with trusts, and common scenarios where it may resolve estate transfer problems. The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman assists clients by clarifying options and guiding them through local court procedures to help transfer assets to the intended trust beneficiaries.
When a trust exists but a specific asset remained titled in the decedent’s individual name, the property can linger outside the trust despite the grantor’s clear intent. A Heggstad petition is filed in probate court to establish that the decedent intended the asset to belong to the trust, allowing the successor trustee to take control without prolonged litigation. This page offers an overview of the petition process in Allendale, explains how it relates to common estate documents like revocable living trusts and pour-over wills, and outlines practical steps families can take to complete trust administration successfully.
A Heggstad petition helps prevent assets from becoming stuck in a decedent’s estate when the intent was to have those assets governed by a trust instrument. Filing the petition provides a clear legal path for moving property into the trust, which supports efficient administration, reduces the risk of disputes among heirs, and preserves privacy by avoiding more extensive probate proceedings. In the Allendale and broader California context, using this procedure can shorten delays in distributing assets and enable trustees to carry out the grantor’s plan for beneficiaries, including terms found in pour-over wills and certification of trust documents.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman in San Jose serves clients across Solano County, including Allendale, providing calm, practical support for trust and estate matters. The firm works directly with families to review trust documents such as revocable living trusts, pour-over wills, and certification of trust forms to determine whether a Heggstad petition is appropriate. Attorneys and staff focus on clear communication, careful preparation of petitions and supporting affidavits, and coordination with probate court procedures so trustees and beneficiaries can achieve timely resolution while honoring the grantor’s documented intentions.
A Heggstad petition establishes that a decedent intended specific property to be held in trust at the time of death, even if the title remained in the decedent’s name. This procedure is typically used when a revocable living trust is in place but certain assets were never retitled into the trust. The petition requires evidence such as the trust instrument, witness statements, or other documentation demonstrating the grantor’s intent. The court may then order transfer of the asset to the successor trustee, enabling those assets to be administered under the trust’s terms without full probate administration.
The Heggstad petition process involves gathering relevant documents, preparing declarations or affidavits from individuals familiar with the grantor’s intent, and filing a formal petition in the appropriate probate court. Local rules and timelines in Solano County influence procedural steps and required notices to interested parties. Responding to potential challenges or competing claims is part of the process, so careful preparation and transparency with heirs and beneficiaries reduces the chance of contested hearings. Properly presenting evidence helps the court decide to effectuate the transfer to the trust.
A Heggstad petition asks the court to recognize that specific property should be treated as trust property because the decedent intended it to be included in the trust at the time of death. The petition does not recreate a trust but confirms the grantor’s intent for property already intended to be part of the trust estate. Typical supporting evidence includes the trust document, correspondence, testimony from those aware of the grantor’s planning, and sometimes contemporaneous estate planning paperwork like pour-over wills. The court’s order then allows a successor trustee to manage and distribute the asset under trust terms.
Pursuing a Heggstad petition involves several key elements such as identifying the asset, producing the operative trust document, preparing declarations from the trustee or witnesses, and filing the petition in probate court with appropriate notices to interested parties. Evidence must show the decedent’s intent that the asset belong in the trust, and that the trust was valid and operative at the relevant time. Attention to court filing requirements and timelines, along with communication with beneficiaries and potential claimants, helps reduce contested issues and speeds the order that transfers title to the trust.
Understanding common terms will help clarify the petition process. Definitions include trust, grantor, successor trustee, probate, pour-over will, and certification of trust. These concepts intersect with the petition by describing the parties, documents, and processes involved in proving that an asset was intended to belong to a trust. Familiarity with these terms helps beneficiaries and trustees follow the legal steps, know what documentation to collect, and understand how a court’s determination affects the administration and distribution of estate assets under trust terms.
A revocable living trust is a legal instrument created during a person’s lifetime that can be changed or revoked by the grantor. It names a trustee to manage trust assets for the benefit of designated beneficiaries and can include instructions for distribution at the grantor’s death. When properly funded, the trust holds title to assets and avoids probate for those items. If assets were intended for the trust but left titled in a decedent’s name, a Heggstad petition can help confirm that those items belong to the trust based on the grantor’s intent and supporting evidence.
A successor trustee steps in to administer the trust after the grantor passes away or becomes incapacitated. The successor trustee gathers trust assets, addresses liabilities, and follows the trust’s terms to manage and distribute property to beneficiaries. When an asset remains in the decedent’s name, the successor trustee may seek a Heggstad petition to secure court authorization to transfer title to the trust. This confirms the trustee’s authority to handle property as intended by the grantor and supports orderly trust administration.
A pour-over will is designed to transfer any assets remaining in the decedent’s individual name into a named trust at death. It typically acts as a safety net to ensure assets not formally titled to the trust eventually move into it. However, assets passing through a pour-over will may still require probate if not otherwise transferred. A Heggstad petition can be used when the grantor clearly intended certain property to belong to the trust but formal title changes were not completed before death, complementing the will’s purpose and facilitating trust administration.
A certification of trust summarizes key terms and confirms the trust’s existence without exposing all details of the full trust document. Financial institutions often accept a certification to allow trustees to manage accounts or retitle assets to a trust. When dealing with assets that were not retitled before death, a certification can be part of the documentation presented with a Heggstad petition to show the trust’s authority and the successor trustee’s power to transfer and manage the asset for the beneficiaries as directed by the trust instrument.
When property intended for a trust remains in a decedent’s name, families can consider different paths such as probate administration, informal transfer with institution cooperation, or filing a Heggstad petition. Probate can be time consuming and public, while informal transfers depend on third-party acceptance and may not resolve title disputes. A Heggstad petition offers a targeted court procedure to confirm trust ownership and avoid broader probate complexity. Evaluating these options involves balancing speed, cost, privacy, and the likelihood of contested claims in the Allendale and Solano County context.
A limited approach such as a Heggstad petition can be sufficient when documentation clearly shows the grantor intended the asset for the trust and there are few or no competing claims. Evidence like the trust document, certification of trust, and witness statements can prove intent and allow the court to transfer title without a full probate case. This option is particularly useful when the asset’s value or complexity does not warrant broader probate administration and when beneficiaries prefer a confined court ruling that moves property into trust distribution quickly and privately.
When beneficiaries and potential interested parties agree on the grantor’s intent and there is no anticipated dispute, a Heggstad petition can resolve title issues with less delay and lower cost than a full probate. Cooperation reduces the need for extensive discovery and litigation, allowing the court to rely on straightforward declarations and documentary proof. Pursuing a focused petition in these circumstances offers a practical path to transfer assets into the trust and proceed with administration according to the grantor’s established plan.
Comprehensive legal involvement is often required when parties contest whether the property should belong to the trust or if evidence of the grantor’s intent is ambiguous. Complex disputes may involve claims from creditors, multiple competing heirs, or allegations of undue influence. In those scenarios, trustees and beneficiaries benefit from a broader probate strategy that may include discovery, hearings, and litigation to protect interests and establish clear title. Using a full probate approach ensures procedural protections while working toward a court determination on ownership.
When assets are complex, such as business interests, real property in multiple counties, retirement accounts, or assets subject to special rules, a comprehensive legal plan becomes important. Issues involving title defects, liens, or third-party claims can require coordinated filings, negotiations with creditors, and a careful review of federal and state law to preserve beneficiary rights. In such cases a broader probate or litigation approach provides the structure needed to address competing legal and factual matters and to obtain court directives for orderly distribution under the trust.
A comprehensive approach to resolving title and trust issues ensures that assets are addressed through proper legal channels, which can prevent future litigation and protect beneficiary interests. This method includes full documentation review, court filings when necessary, settlement negotiations, and representation during hearings. Although it may involve greater immediate cost or time than an informal fix, the thorough approach reduces long-term uncertainty, addresses potential creditor claims or competing heirs, and helps secure a definitive court order that supports the trust’s administration and final distributions.
Using a broad legal strategy also helps families preserve privacy where possible, clarify successor trustee powers, and enforce the grantor’s final wishes with legal authority. When complex assets or contested claims exist, this approach minimizes the risk of future challenges by ensuring that court orders, properly prepared documentation, and compliant procedures are in place. Trustees and beneficiaries gain confidence in their ability to complete administration and move forward with distributions according to the trust instrument while reducing the prospect of reopening disputes later.
Securing a clear court determination that property belongs to the trust helps avoid future litigation and prevents uncertainty in title matters. A comprehensive approach includes obtaining orders that document ownership, authorize trustee actions, and clarify distribution rights, which benefits current and future beneficiaries. This legal certainty supports smoother asset management and reduces the likelihood of renewed claims. The clarity of a court’s decision is particularly valuable for assets that may be sold or transferred after title issues are resolved, ensuring purchasers and institutions accept the trust’s authority.
Comprehensive legal handling generates a full record of the trust’s validity, the grantor’s intent, and the steps taken to transfer property. Robust documentation protects trustees from future claims and provides beneficiaries with confidence that distributions followed proper procedures. When courts issue orders based on thorough evidence, financial institutions and title companies are more likely to accept transfers and close accounts. This protective approach mitigates risk and supports long-term stability of the trust administration process.
Collecting thorough documentation is foundational to a successful petition. Start by locating the revocable living trust, any certification of trust, the decedent’s relevant account statements, and titles for real or personal property. Include any correspondence or signed statements that show the grantor intended the asset to belong to the trust. Affidavits from people who witnessed the grantor’s planning or assisted with trust funding can strengthen the petition. The more complete and organized the records, the clearer the path for the court to confirm trust ownership and allow timely administration.
Probate court practices vary by county, and Solano County has particular filing and notice rules that affect petitions. Confirm local forms, filing fees, service requirements, and hearing timelines before submitting paperwork. Anticipate the need to provide notices to interested parties and prepare declarations or affidavits that meet court standards for evidence. Being prepared for the local procedural landscape helps avoid delays and increases the likelihood that the court will accept the petition and issue an order transferring title to the trust.
Families may consider filing a Heggstad petition when assets were clearly intended to be part of a trust but were never retitled, leaving those items outside the trust at death. The petition is a targeted legal remedy to obtain court confirmation of the grantor’s intent, enabling the successor trustee to access and manage property under the trust’s terms. This route can prevent extended probate, reduce administrative costs, and align the distribution process with the decedent’s plan, particularly when documentation and witness testimony support the claimed intent to include the asset in the trust.
Another common reason to pursue this petition is to address title defects affecting real estate or other titled assets. If institutions or title companies require a court order before transferring ownership to a trustee, a Heggstad petition can provide the official determination needed. Filing the petition helps resolve ownership questions, satisfies third-party requirements, and allows trustees to proceed with selling, refinancing, or distributing assets in accordance with the trust, minimizing administrative friction and supporting a more orderly estate administration process.
Common scenarios include real property left solely in the decedent’s name, bank accounts or investment accounts not retitled to the trust, or personal property for which title paperwork was never updated. A Heggstad petition can also be appropriate when a pour-over will exists but using it would require probate, whereas a focused petition can move property into the trust more directly. These circumstances arise when a grantor’s intent was clear but administrative steps were incomplete, prompting the successor trustee to seek court confirmation to effectuate transfers.
Real estate often requires a Heggstad petition when it remains titled in the grantor’s name despite a trust designation. Title companies and county records may not reflect the trust’s ownership without a court order. A petition demonstrates the grantor’s intent and enables the successor trustee to record a deed transferring the property into the trust or to sell according to trust terms. Addressing real property through the appropriate court procedure ensures clear title for beneficiaries and potential buyers in subsequent transactions.
Financial accounts, brokerage holdings, or vehicles sometimes remain in the decedent’s name at death, creating hurdles to trustee management. When institutions require documented proof that the asset belongs to the trust, a Heggstad petition can provide the legal authority to transfer account ownership and permit trustee actions. By concentrating on the evidence that the decedent intended the trust to hold these assets, trustees can secure formal recognition needed to consolidate estate property under the trust for distribution to beneficiaries.
Personal property such as antiques, collectibles, or vehicles with ambiguous title histories can pose difficulties for trustees trying to manage or distribute trust assets. When documentation is incomplete or records do not explicitly show trust ownership, a Heggstad petition offers a route to establish that the grantor intended the property to be part of the trust. Presenting witness statements, receipts, and related documents can support the petition and enable the trustee to administer or transfer the item in alignment with the trust terms.
Residents of Allendale and neighboring areas in Solano County can seek assistance to evaluate whether a Heggstad petition fits their situation. The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman helps trustees and families review trust instruments, assemble documentation, prepare affidavits, and file the petition in the appropriate probate court. With attention to local procedures and clear communication, the firm supports clients in presenting evidence of the grantor’s intent and pursuing efficient court orders that permit the successor trustee to manage and distribute assets under the trust.
Choosing legal representation for a Heggstad petition means working with a firm familiar with trust documents, probate rules, and local court practices. The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman offers a client-focused approach that emphasizes document preparation, strategic court filings, and consistent communication with trustees and beneficiaries. This service helps ensure that petitions are presented clearly and that required notices and evidence comply with Solano County probate requirements, supporting timely resolution and minimizing procedural setbacks for the trust administration.
We work collaboratively with clients to gather the necessary records, draft precise declarations, and explain each procedural step so families can make informed decisions. The firm assists with coordinating interactions with title companies and financial institutions that may require a court order for transfers. By anticipating likely questions and preparing cohesive evidence packets, the goal is to streamline court acceptance of the petition and to provide a transparent process that supports the trustee’s ability to act for beneficiaries under the trust instrument.
Throughout the process, the focus remains on honoring the grantor’s documented intentions, protecting beneficiary rights, and helping trustees fulfill their duties efficiently. Whether a focused Heggstad petition or a broader probate action is appropriate, the office provides practical guidance on selecting the path that best aligns with the estate’s circumstances. Families receive assistance preparing for hearings, responding to inquiries, and implementing the court’s directives to move property into trust administration and complete distributions.
Our process begins with a focused intake to review the trust, the asset in question, and any related estate documents such as a pour-over will, certification of trust, or HIPAA authorization. We identify needed evidence, draft declarations, and prepare the petition packet tailored to Solano County procedures. After filing, we manage service to interested parties and follow up with the court for hearings. Throughout, we keep trustees informed of timelines and next steps so that property can move into trust administration efficiently once the court issues its determination.
The initial step focuses on reviewing the trust instrument and gathering proof of the grantor’s intent. This includes locating deeds, titles, account statements, the trust document itself, and any related estate planning paperwork such as a pour-over will or certification of trust. Witness declarations and correspondence that reflect the grantor’s planning are also collected. A thorough document collection helps craft a persuasive and complete petition to present to the probate court and lays the groundwork for the trustee to assert authority over the asset once the court issues guidance.
We identify the specific title issue affecting the asset and determine which records are required to show the grantor’s intent to include the property in the trust. This may involve reviewing county property records, vehicle titles, or financial account documents. Gathering corroborating documents such as prior deeds, account statements, or insurance records strengthens the petition. Clear organization of these materials helps the court and interested parties understand the factual basis for the requested order transferring the asset to the trust.
Drafting declarations and affidavits from the successor trustee and witnesses is an essential part of establishing the grantor’s intent. These statements explain the circumstances of the trust funding, any steps taken by the grantor to place assets into the trust, and reasons why title did not transfer prior to death. Documentary exhibits accompany the declarations to corroborate the narrative. Together, the written records and witness statements form the evidentiary basis for the petition to seek a court order to transfer title into the trust.
After preparing the petition and supporting evidence, the next phase involves filing with the appropriate probate court and ensuring that all required notices are served to interested parties, heirs, and known creditors. Local filing requirements and service rules in Solano County must be followed to avoid procedural defects. Proper notice gives parties the opportunity to respond, and the court will schedule hearings if contested issues arise. Timely and accurate service helps move the process forward and reduces the risk of delays caused by insufficient notice.
Compliance with county-specific procedures is essential to avoid avoidable delays. This includes submitting required forms, paying filing fees, and adhering to timelines for service and response. We ensure that documents are formatted correctly and that required declarations include the necessary content to meet court standards. Being mindful of local practices helps the petition proceed efficiently and positions the trustee to respond promptly to any objections or inquiries from the court or interested parties.
If interested parties file objections, the petition process may require additional evidence, negotiation, or a contested hearing. Preparing for and addressing responses involves gathering supplemental documentation, refining declarations, and, when appropriate, discussing resolution options with opposing parties. The objective is to present a clear factual record that supports the trust ownership claim while exploring opportunities to resolve disputes without protracted litigation. Effective handling of objections helps preserve trustee authority and advance trust administration.
Once the petition proceeds to hearing, the court evaluates the evidence and may issue an order transferring title to the trust if it finds sufficient proof of the grantor’s intent. Following the order, the successor trustee can record deeds, instruct financial institutions to retitle accounts, or otherwise place assets under the trust’s control. Implementing the court’s directives requires careful follow-through with title companies, banks, and other institutions to ensure records are updated so the trustee can carry out distributions and management according to the trust instrument.
After securing a court order, the trustee records any necessary deeds or title documents to reflect the trust’s ownership of real property and other titled assets. This step typically involves working with county recorder offices and title companies to ensure that records accurately show the trust as owner. Proper recording protects future transactions and reduces the possibility of disputes about ownership. Ensuring all public records reflect the transfer completes the administrative aspect of moving assets into the trust.
With the court’s order in hand, trustees contact banks, brokerage firms, and other institutions to effect account retitling or transfers. Institutions often require certified copies of court documents and identification of the successor trustee, along with a certification of trust in some cases. Coordinating these actions resolves practical access and control issues, allowing trustees to manage investments, close accounts, or distribute funds consistent with trust instructions. This administrative follow-through is essential to finalize the transfer and enable distribution to beneficiaries.
A Heggstad petition is a legal filing asking the probate court to recognize that particular property should be treated as trust property because the decedent intended it to be held in the trust at the time of death. It is typically used when a trust exists but a specific asset was never retitled into the trust and therefore remains in the decedent’s individual name. The petition presents evidence such as the trust instrument, witness statements, and supporting documents to show the grantor’s intent, enabling the court to order transfer of the asset to the successor trustee. This procedure is narrower than full probate administration and focuses on establishing trust ownership for the asset at issue. It helps trustees secure legal authority to access, manage, or distribute the asset under the trust’s terms. Because it targets specific title defects or unretitled items, it can be an efficient way to complete trust funding without initiating a broader probate case when documentation and circumstances strongly indicate the grantor’s intent.
The timeline for a Heggstad petition in Solano County varies depending on the complexity of the matter, the completeness of documentation, and whether interested parties object. In straightforward cases with clear evidence and cooperative beneficiaries, the process may be resolved within a few months from filing to court order, accounting for required notice periods and scheduling. If local calendar congestion is light and all filings comply with court rules, proceedings can move relatively quickly compared with a full probate case. When disputes arise, the timeline may extend significantly due to the need for additional evidence, negotiated resolutions, or contested hearings. Court availability, the volume of required filings, and responses from institutions or heirs also influence duration. Preparing a thorough petition and providing clear supporting documentation up front helps reduce delays and improves the chances of a prompt court determination.
Effective support for a Heggstad petition typically includes the trust document, a certification of trust if available, title records or account statements showing ownership, and declarations from the successor trustee and any witnesses familiar with the grantor’s planning. Correspondence, contemporaneous notes, or other writings that show the grantor intended the asset to be in the trust can strengthen the case. Together, these materials help demonstrate both the trust’s validity and the grantor’s intent for the specific asset to be held by the trust. Affidavits or declarations should recount the relevant facts clearly and coherently, describing how and when the grantor created the trust, any steps taken toward funding, and the reasons the asset remained in the grantor’s name. The more coherent and corroborated the narrative, the more persuasive the petition will be to the court and to institutions that must recognize the transfer after the order is issued.
Filing a Heggstad petition does not necessarily force beneficiaries into litigation, but it does involve court proceedings that require notices and the opportunity for interested parties to object. When beneficiaries and heirs are cooperative and the facts are clear, the petition can often proceed without contested litigation, resulting in a judicial order that confirms trust ownership. Transparent communication with beneficiaries and early sharing of supporting documents can reduce the likelihood of objections and contested hearings. If a beneficiary objects, the matter may require additional filings, evidence, and a contested hearing, which resembles litigation in process. In contested situations, courts will evaluate conflicting claims and evidence before issuing a determination. Because contested proceedings can lengthen the process and increase cost, the best practice is to seek consensus when possible and prepare a well-documented petition in case disputes do arise.
A Heggstad petition is focused on confirming that a particular asset should be treated as trust property, while probate administration is a broader process that handles debts, distribution of estate assets, and many administrative tasks for property that must pass through probate. Probate can be lengthy and public, addressing multiple estate matters and claims, whereas a Heggstad petition seeks a court determination specific to trust ownership for designated assets so those items can be administered under the trust instead of through probate. When a Heggstad petition succeeds, the asset is transferred into the trust and subject to the trustee’s authority, often avoiding the need for full probate for that asset. However, if the estate has multiple assets and claims that require probate, or if disputes cannot be resolved through a targeted petition, then probate administration may still be necessary to resolve broader estate issues.
Banks and title companies often accept a court order resulting from a Heggstad petition as sufficient authority to retitle assets or release funds to a trustee, but acceptance can vary depending on the institution and the completeness of accompanying documentation. Institutions frequently require certified copies of the court order, identification of the successor trustee, and sometimes a certification of trust or other proof of trustee authority. Preparing a comprehensive evidence packet with the order and supporting documents improves the likelihood that institutions will cooperate. Some institutions may have internal policies that require additional steps or documentation, such as updated account paperwork or internal approvals. Working with the institution and providing requested certified documents and clear court directives generally resolves practical hurdles. If an institution resists, further steps may include filing additional court documents or orders to compel compliance, depending on the circumstances.
Yes, a Heggstad petition can be contested by interested parties who challenge the sufficiency of evidence or the grantor’s intent. When contested, the court will consider additional filings, evidence, and oral testimony as needed to resolve disputes. Contested proceedings may require extra time for discovery, witness preparation, and legal argument, so trustees should be prepared to support their position with comprehensive documentation and well-crafted declarations. Handling disputes often involves attempts at negotiation and clarification before a hearing. If settlement is not possible, the court will determine the matter based on evidentiary standards and applicable law. Careful preparation and clear factual presentation are key to resolving contested issues and obtaining a favorable order that enables the trustee to proceed with administration.
Costs associated with a Heggstad petition include court filing fees, costs for serving notices to interested parties, and fees for preparing required declarations and exhibits. Attorney fees vary based on the complexity of the factual record, the need for additional evidence, and whether the petition is contested. In straightforward cases, fees and expenses tend to be lower than those for full probate administration since the scope is narrower and the court process is typically more limited in duration. If the petition becomes contested or additional court appearances are required, costs can increase. Other potential expenses include fees for certified copies of court orders, recording fees for deeds, and charges imposed by financial institutions for processing account changes. Understanding likely expenses in advance and preparing thorough documentation can help manage costs and reduce the risk of extended proceedings that drive up fees.
A Heggstad petition is generally aimed at assets that require title or ownership recognition to be moved into a trust, and it is not typically the mechanism for transferring assets where beneficiary designations control, such as many retirement accounts or payable-on-death accounts. Retirement accounts often pass according to named beneficiaries rather than trust ownership, so addressing those assets may involve beneficiary designations or plan administrator processes. If a retirement account was intended to be controlled by the trust, plan rules and federal regulations must be reviewed to determine appropriate steps. When beneficiary designations conflict with trust provisions or when account ownership is ambiguous, careful review of plan documents and beneficiary forms is necessary. In some instances, coordination between trust administration and plan administrators or additional court filings may be needed to resolve ownership and distribution consistent with the decedent’s intent and applicable law.
Trustees and grantors can take practical steps to minimize the need for a Heggstad petition by ensuring proper funding of the trust during the grantor’s lifetime. This includes retitling real estate, bank and investment accounts, and vehicles into the trust, updating deeds, and providing institutions with a certification of trust when needed. Maintaining up-to-date records and confirming that key assets are titled correctly are effective preventive measures that reduce the likelihood of property remaining in the grantor’s name at death. Regular reviews of estate planning documents and coordination with financial institutions help keep asset ownership aligned with the trust. Keeping beneficiaries informed about where assets are titled and maintaining clear, accessible documentation supports smooth transition at death. These proactive steps limit the administrative burdens on successor trustees and reduce the potential need for court petitions to confirm trust ownership.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas