A Heggstad Petition can be an important step for beneficiaries or successor trustees when assets were not properly transferred into a trust but should have been under the settlor’s intent. In Hartley and throughout Solano County, individuals and families encounter this situation when property titles or account registrations were overlooked during trust funding. This page explains what a Heggstad Petition is, the kinds of outcomes it can achieve, and how the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman help clients clarify ownership and honor the decedent’s or settlor’s documented plans while navigating California probate and trust administration procedures.
The following content outlines what to expect when pursuing a Heggstad Petition, including the legal standards used by California courts, the documentation commonly required, and practical steps a trustee or beneficiary can take to prepare. We discuss timelines, common challenges such as creditor claims or competing heirs, and how a petition can resolve disputes about whether certain assets belong to the trust. Whether you are handling a recently deceased loved one’s estate or managing an already active trust, this guide provides clear explanations and actionable information specific to Hartley residents and Solano County court practice.
Filing a Heggstad Petition can provide a formal court finding that certain assets should be treated as trust property despite not being formally retitled. This remedy can prevent those assets from entering the probate estate, preserve privacy, and allow the trustee to distribute or manage property according to the trust document. It can also reduce prolonged disputes among family members by delivering judicial clarity and can minimize administrative delays. For trustees and beneficiaries in Hartley, a successful petition helps streamline trust administration and aligns property ownership with the settlor’s written intentions, providing practical closure and maintaining continuity of asset management.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman assists clients in Hartley and throughout California with a broad range of estate planning and trust administration matters, including Heggstad Petitions. Our approach emphasizes careful document review, clear client communication, and sensible planning to resolve title disputes while respecting court procedures and timelines. We work with trustees, beneficiaries, and family members to collect required evidence, draft pleadings, and represent clients at hearings if needed. With offices reachable by phone at 408-528-2827, we aim to provide responsive guidance that helps clients stabilize estate affairs and complete trust administration efficiently.
A Heggstad Petition is a judicial proceeding in California that asks the court to recognize title to property as belonging to a trust even though the title was not formally transferred during the settlor’s lifetime. It typically involves showing that the settlor intended the property to be trust property and that the failure to retitle was a mistake, oversight, or technical omission. This remedy can be appropriate when original planning documents clearly indicate intent and when there is supporting evidence such as trust language, bank records, correspondence, or testimony. The petition provides a legal mechanism to align recorded ownership with the settlor’s documented plan without full probate.
The court will evaluate several factors when considering a Heggstad Petition, including the trust instrument itself, whether the settlor had immediate and clear intent to fund the trust, and any contemporaneous actions that support retitling. Evidence often includes trust documents, beneficiary designations, account statements, deeds, and statements from those familiar with the settlor’s intentions. The process can involve notification to heirs and creditors and may require resolution of competing claims. Understanding these steps helps trustees anticipate necessary documentation, timelines, and possible outcomes under California trust administration rules.
A Heggstad Petition is a specific petition filed in probate court seeking a judicial determination that certain property should be treated as trust property despite lacking formal retitling. The petition is named after a key California case and is used when the settlor’s intent is documented but record title does not reflect the trust. Courts consider written instruments, testimony, and conduct showing the settlor intended the trust to own the property. The remedy can remove property from probate and allow distribution or management according to the trust, preventing administrative complications and aligning legal title with testamentary objectives.
Pursuing a Heggstad Petition generally involves assembling evidence that the settlor intended the asset to be trust property, preparing the petition and supporting declarations, filing with the appropriate Solano County probate court, and providing notice to interested parties including heirs and creditors. The court may hold a hearing to evaluate contested facts and decide whether equitable relief is appropriate. Post-judgment steps can include recording court orders to effectuate title changes. Careful documentation, timely notification, and a clear presentation of the settlor’s intent are essential to a successful petition and efficient trust administration.
Understanding common terms helps trustees and beneficiaries navigate a Heggstad Petition. This glossary summarizes frequently used phrases and legal concepts encountered during the petition process, including trust funding, record title, probate avoidance, and court orders. These definitions provide context for the documents and evidence needed to demonstrate intent and rectify record discrepancies. Familiarity with these terms can make interactions with the probate court and other parties more effective and reduce confusion during trust administration in Hartley and Solano County.
Trust funding refers to the process of transferring ownership of assets into a trust so the trust controls those assets according to the trust document. Funding can include changing titles on real property, retitling bank and investment accounts, updating beneficiary designations where appropriate, and assigning other assets to the trust. Proper funding ensures that trust terms will govern distribution and management, reducing the likelihood that assets will need to pass through probate. A Heggstad Petition addresses situations where funding was intended but transmission into the trust did not occur due to oversight or error.
Record title refers to the legal ownership shown on public records or account registrations for an asset, such as a county deed for real property or account registration with a bank or brokerage. When record title does not match the settlor’s trust documents, conflicts can arise during trust administration. A Heggstad Petition seeks a judicial finding that despite the record title, the asset should be treated as trust property based on the settlor’s clear intent. Correcting record title often requires court orders, recorded documents, or administrative changes following a judicial determination.
Probate avoidance describes the goal of preventing assets from becoming part of the decedent’s probate estate, thereby allowing trust terms to control distribution without court-supervised probate administration. Funding a trust and making effective beneficiary designations are common ways to avoid probate. When assets remain in an individual’s name despite intent to fund a trust, a Heggstad Petition can help avoid probate by establishing trust ownership through a court order, preserving privacy and often reducing time and administrative costs associated with probate proceedings.
A judicial determination is a court’s formal decision on a legal issue, such as whether specific assets should be treated as trust property under a Heggstad Petition. The court evaluates evidence, hears arguments from interested parties, and issues an order that clarifies ownership rights and directs appropriate relief. A clear judicial determination allows trustees to act confidently in managing or distributing assets and provides legal protection against future disputes about title. Recording the court order may be necessary to effect changes in public records or account registrations.
When property appears to have been omitted from a trust, parties can consider several pathways including informal title transfers, beneficiary claim negotiations, full probate administration, or a Heggstad Petition. Informal solutions may work when all interested parties agree, but disagreements or third-party claims can complicate matters. Probate can resolve title but brings public filings and longer timelines. A Heggstad Petition offers a middle ground, allowing court clarification specifically limited to the question of trust ownership without full probate. Choosing the right path depends on the asset type, the settlor’s documentation, and the level of dispute among interested parties.
A limited approach may be suitable when beneficiaries and trustees share a clear understanding of the settlor’s intent and there are no significant creditor or third-party disputes. In those cases, parties can sometimes resolve title issues by providing banks or title companies with the trust documents and a short affidavit or declaration. Where records and contemporaneous evidence support the claim, administrative corrections can be efficient and cost effective. However, it remains important to ensure proper documentation and, when appropriate, to obtain a court order to prevent future challenges to ownership.
When the assets at issue are low in value or not contested by other heirs, parties may decide to pursue administrative corrections or informal transfers instead of litigation. This route can save time and expense, particularly when the trustee and beneficiaries are in agreement and third-party institutions accept the trust documents. Still, even for modest assets, it helps to maintain thorough records of actions taken and to consider whether a brief court order would offer added protection against future disagreements or claims that could complicate trust administration down the road.
A comprehensive approach, such as filing a Heggstad Petition, becomes necessary when there are disputes among heirs, competing beneficiary claims, or potential creditor interests that could block administrative remedies. Courts can weigh evidence, resolve credibility disputes, and issue binding orders that clarify ownership and protect trustees acting under the decree. This reduces the risk of later litigation and helps ensure distributions proceed in a manner consistent with the settlor’s documented plan. The judicial route is also advisable when institutions decline to accept documentation without a court order.
For complex assets such as real property, closely held business interests, or high-value accounts, a court order resolving title disputes provides legal certainty and can safely enable trustees to manage, sell, or distribute assets in accordance with the trust. Complex circumstances often involve multiple documents, prior transfers, or potential creditor claims that benefit from judicial oversight. A Heggstad Petition helps ensure property is handled appropriately and shields trustees and beneficiaries from later claims that could arise from unclear or incomplete record title.
Choosing a court-based resolution like a Heggstad Petition can preserve privacy by avoiding full probate in many cases, provide a definitive legal ruling on ownership, and allow trustees to proceed with trust administration with greater confidence. It can shorten long-term disputes by establishing a clear record and provide the legal basis for recording title changes or effecting transfers. For families in Hartley, securing a judicial determination can reduce ongoing conflict and simplify the practical steps needed to settle the trust and distribute assets according to the settlor’s wishes.
A comprehensive approach also protects trustees who must make decisions affecting property that may be claimed by multiple parties. With a court order, trustees can act without fear of later reversal, and financial institutions or county recorders are more likely to accept necessary changes to title or account registrations. This legal assurance can enable timely sales, transfers, or distributions, reduce administrative friction, and provide a permanent record that helps prevent future litigation or uncertainty about the trust’s holdings.
One major benefit of a court-ordered determination is the legal certainty it brings to trustees charged with managing and distributing trust assets. A Heggstad Petition can produce an authoritative finding that certain assets belong to the trust, shielding trustees from later claims that might arise from heirs or creditors. That protection enables trustees to take necessary actions such as selling property, paying debts, or distributing proceeds in accordance with the trust document without undue hesitation, knowing their actions are supported by the court’s decision and formal record.
While court proceedings involve preparation and filing, a focused petition can be more efficient than full probate and can conclusively resolve title issues that would otherwise linger. By concentrating on the specific question of whether assets belong to the trust, parties can avoid prolonged estate litigation and reduce the potential for multiple separate disputes. The result is often a clearer path to finalizing trust administration, distributing assets to beneficiaries, and completing the settlor’s wishes with fewer subsequent interruptions and legal challenges.
Begin by collecting all documents that reflect the settlor’s intent, including the trust instrument, deeds, account statements, beneficiary designations, and any correspondence that shows planning decisions. Having clear documentation makes it easier to present a persuasive petition and can shorten court review. Also prepare affidavits or declarations from individuals with firsthand knowledge of the settlor’s actions and intent. Well-organized records help clarify why title did not reflect the trust and support a streamlined judicial determination that aligns ownership with the trust document.
Assess whether the asset in question is likely to spark disputes, whether it is complex to value, or whether third-party approvals are required to transfer title. For high-value property, business interests, or assets with multiple owners, a court order provides added protection and clarity. For modest or uncontested assets, administrative corrections may suffice. Evaluating these practical factors early helps determine whether a Heggstad Petition is the best route, and prepares trustees to gather the evidence and legal arguments necessary for court consideration.
Consider a Heggstad Petition when record title does not match the trust documents and the asset is significant to the trust’s administration or distribution plan. If the settlor clearly intended the property to be in the trust but a deed or account registration was never changed, a petition can align legal title with that intent. Also consider this remedy when financial institutions or title companies refuse administrative transfers without a court order, or when multiple heirs dispute ownership. The petition provides a formal path to resolve such situations and preserve the settlor’s documented wishes.
A petition should also be considered when trustees or beneficiaries seek protection from later claims or when the asset’s inclusion in the trust will prevent probate and related delays. Filing a Heggstad Petition may be appropriate when evidence of intent is strong but incomplete, as the court can weigh the totality of circumstances and issue a binding order. This option is particularly relevant in Hartley and Solano County when timely resolution and legal clarity are important to complete trust administration in a practical and efficient manner.
Common circumstances include real estate left in the decedent’s name, bank or brokerage accounts that were not retitled to the trust, or assets acquired shortly before death that were intended to be included in the trust. Other triggers include transfers that were started but not completed, or cases where the settlor executed trust documents but did not follow through with administrative retitling. Identifying the specific scenario helps determine the evidence needed and whether a Heggstad Petition or another approach best resolves ownership concerns in trust administration.
Properties sometimes remain in an individual’s name due to oversights, logistical hurdles, or timing of transactions. When a deed was never transferred into the trust but contemporaneous documents show the settlor intended the trust to hold the property, a Heggstad Petition can prompt the court to declare the real property as trust-owned. This process often requires examination of title history, deeds, and the trust document, along with testimony or declarations about the settlor’s planning decisions and actions related to the property.
Financial accounts or retirement assets may remain registered in the settlor’s name despite trust documents indicating otherwise. Banks and financial institutions may decline to accept trust paperwork without a court order. In these situations a petition can secure a declaration that the accounts are trust property and authorize the trustee to manage or transfer funds according to the trust. Documentation such as beneficiary designations, account statements, and communications with the institution helps support the petition and clarifies ownership for administration purposes.
Assets acquired shortly before death, such as newly purchased property or bank accounts opened in the settlor’s name, may have been intended for the trust but never retitled. A Heggstad Petition can address such acquisitions by demonstrating the settlor’s intent and the context of the purchase or transfer. Evidence may include purchase documents, settlement statements, trust provisions, and testimony indicating the settlor’s plan to include the asset in the trust, allowing trustees to align administration with those intentions.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman serves Hartley and Solano County residents with focused assistance on trust funding and Heggstad Petitions. We help clients evaluate whether a petition is appropriate, gather the necessary documentation, prepare and file pleadings with the probate court, and coordinate notices to interested parties. Our goal is to provide clear guidance through each step of the process and to secure orders that enable trustees to manage and distribute trust assets in accordance with the settlor’s wishes, while minimizing administrative delay and uncertainty.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman offers experienced representation in estate planning and trust administration matters, with practical knowledge of California court procedures and Solano County practice. We help clients gather and organize evidence, draft persuasive petitions, and present the case clearly to the court. Our approach emphasizes thorough preparation and consistent communication so clients understand timelines, potential outcomes, and next steps. We are available by phone at 408-528-2827 to discuss case specifics and to begin assembling documentation needed for a petition.
When disputes arise or when institutions require a court order before making title changes, having a firm that knows the local probate process can make the proceedings smoother and more predictable. We focus on preparing clear evidence of the settlor’s intent and handling procedural requirements such as notices and filings. The objective is to achieve a definitive court determination that supports trustees in acting with confidence and protects beneficiaries’ interests during trust administration in Hartley and Solano County.
Our office can assist with related documents and services commonly encountered in trust administration and estate planning, including revocable living trusts, pour-over wills, health care directives, powers of attorney, and trust certifications. Where necessary, we coordinate with title companies, financial institutions, and county recorders to implement court orders and complete retitling steps. Clients benefit from practical guidance that helps transition from judicial resolution to implementing the trust terms and closing estate affairs efficiently.
Our process begins with a case assessment to determine whether a Heggstad Petition is appropriate and what evidence will be required. We then help gather documents, prepare declarations, draft the petition, and file it with the Solano County probate court. We ensure correct service and address any responses from interested parties. If a hearing is required, we present the supporting record and advocate for the requested relief. After a favorable order, we assist with recording documents or working with institutions to effectuate the court’s ruling so trustees can implement trust distributions.
The first step involves a thorough review of the trust document, deeds, account statements, and any other documents showing the settlor’s intent. We identify gaps in title and determine what supplemental evidence, such as affidavits or communications with institutions, will be necessary. This stage also includes identifying interested parties who must be notified and assessing potential objections. The goal is to assemble a concise but persuasive evidentiary record that supports the petition and anticipates common challenges in court.
Careful review of trust instruments and supporting records helps pinpoint assets that were intended for the trust but not retitled. We analyze clauses, schedules, and any contemporaneous documentation to show the settlor’s intentions. This work often uncovers bank statements, deeds, or correspondence that, combined, create a clear narrative for the court. Properly organizing these materials into declarations and exhibits strengthens the petition and helps the court evaluate the case without needless delay.
Once documentation is assembled, we identify heirs, beneficiaries, and known creditors who must be given notice under California law. Proper notice is essential to the petition process and helps prevent later procedural challenges. We prepare and serve required notices, manage responses, and work to resolve informal objections where possible. Clear communication early in the process often reduces contentious responses and can lead to quicker resolution, whether by agreement or through the court’s determination.
After gathering evidence and serving notice, the petition is filed with the probate court and accompanied by declarations and supporting exhibits. The court reviews filings, considers any objections, and may set a hearing to evaluate contested facts. We prepare hearing materials and present the facts in an organized manner to aid the judge’s decision. The process can vary depending on whether the matter is uncontested or contested, but the goal remains to secure a clear judicial ruling that aligns recorded title with the settlor’s documented intentions.
Preparation of declarations and exhibits is central to a successful petition. Declarations from trustees, family members, or professionals, along with documentary evidence such as deeds, account statements, and correspondence, help create a factual record showing intent. Exhibits must be organized and referenced clearly so the court can assess the evidence efficiently. Strong presentation of the documentary record increases the likelihood of a favorable determination without unnecessary hearings or delays.
If objections arise, we address them through written responses and, when necessary, hearings. The court evaluates credibility and the totality of evidence to determine whether the asset should be considered trust property. Litigation elements may include depositions, motions, or evidentiary hearings depending on the dispute’s complexity. Even when contested, focusing on clear documentation and organized testimony helps the court resolve issues efficiently and arrive at an order that clarifies ownership for trust administration.
Once the court issues an order determining that assets belong to the trust, we assist with implementing the judgment, which may include recording documents, providing the order to financial institutions, and handling title transfers. This step ensures the court’s decision is reflected in public records and account registrations so trustees can manage, sell, or distribute assets as directed by the trust. Completing these administrative tasks helps close out the trust administration process and provides beneficiaries with the outcome intended by the settlor.
After a favorable order, we coordinate with county recorders, title companies, and financial institutions to update public records and account registrations. Recording the court order or providing certified copies can be necessary to transfer deeds or change account ownership. We follow up with each institution to confirm acceptance of the court’s determination and to complete any additional paperwork required to finalize ownership changes, ensuring the trust’s holdings are properly reflected in all relevant records.
With title clarified and assets properly documented, trustees can proceed to distribute property according to the trust terms and complete administrative duties such as paying debts, preparing accountings if needed, and closing accounts. We assist trustees in confirming final balances, preparing distribution documentation, and addressing any last procedural items to close the trust administration process. The end result is an orderly transition that implements the settlor’s wishes and reduces the chance of future disputes over the resolved assets.
A Heggstad Petition is a court action in California asking the probate court to recognize certain property as trust assets even though the record title was not changed. It is used when the trust document and supporting evidence indicate the settlor intended for the property to be held by the trust, but the formal retitling was not completed. The petition requests an order aligning legal title with the settlor’s documented intentions so the trustee can manage and distribute the asset according to the trust terms. This can prevent the asset from entering probate and provide clarity for trust administration. To pursue a petition, the petitioner must assemble trust documents, deeds or account records, and declarations or testimony demonstrating intent. The court reviews this evidence and considers any objections from interested parties. If the court finds the evidence persuasive, it issues an order that may be recorded or presented to institutions to effectuate title changes. The process balances factual demonstration of intent with procedural requirements to protect all interested parties.
The timeline for a Heggstad Petition in Solano County varies depending on complexity, court scheduling, and whether the matter is contested. An uncontested petition supported by clear documents and without objections can move more quickly, while contested matters that require hearings or additional discovery can take longer. Typical timeframes range from a few months for straightforward cases to longer periods when disputes arise or complicated evidence must be evaluated. Court calendars and procedural requirements also affect scheduling and final resolution. Preparation time before filing can also influence the total timeline. Gathering deeds, account statements, and declarations takes effort, and serving notice to interested parties must be completed correctly. Responding to objections or requests for further evidence can extend the process. Planning ahead and preparing a clear evidentiary record helps streamline court review and can reduce delays when seeking a judicial determination of trust ownership.
Support for a Heggstad Petition typically requires the trust instrument, any schedules or pour-over wills, deeds or account statements related to the asset, and declarations from trustees or witnesses who can attest to the settlor’s intent. Correspondence, drafts of planning documents, and transaction records that corroborate the settlor’s actions and intent are also helpful. Organizing these items into a coherent narrative with exhibits makes the petition more persuasive and assists the court in evaluating whether the asset should be treated as trust property. Additional evidence may include confirmations from financial institutions or title company records, settlement statements for real estate transactions, and affidavits from those with direct knowledge of the settlor’s planning. Where disputes exist, declarations that address inconsistencies or provide context can be critical to resolving factual questions. The stronger and more consistent the documentary record, the greater the likelihood of a favorable judicial determination.
A trustee may petition the court even without unanimous consent from all heirs, but proper notice must be given to all interested parties as required by California law. The court provides a forum for resolving disputed claims and determining whether the asset should be treated as trust property. Filing a petition protects the trustee by seeking a court order that permits actions consistent with the trust once the court resolves ownership, even in the face of disagreement from some parties. While consent from heirs can simplify the process and avoid contested hearings, lack of consent does not preclude filing. The trustee should be prepared to present evidence and respond to objections. The court will evaluate credibility and documentation before issuing a determination, so careful preparation and proper service of notice are essential when proceeding without full agreement among interested parties.
Filing a Heggstad Petition can remove a specific asset from probate if the court determines the asset belongs to the trust, but it does not automatically resolve every probate-related issue for other assets. The petition addresses the ownership of identified property and provides a judicial declaration that enables trustees to manage or distribute that property under the trust’s terms. If the court grants the petition, the asset may be handled outside probate, helping avoid the probate process for that particular item. However, other assets that remain solely in the decedent’s name or that have different legal characteristics may still be subject to probate. The petition is a targeted remedy for assets intended for the trust but not formally funded, and it should be part of a broader assessment of estate administration needs to determine whether additional actions or filings are necessary to complete the overall estate settlement.
Banks, title companies, and other institutions often require clear documentation to retitle assets, and many will accept a court order resolving ownership questions. A Heggstad court order provides authoritative evidence that the asset belongs to the trust and typically satisfies institutional requirements for changing registrations or updating deeds. Presenting a certified court order and supporting documents usually enables institutions to make the necessary changes to account registrations or county records. Institutional practices can vary, so it is helpful to coordinate with the institution early in the process and confirm what they will require to accept the court’s determination. In some cases, additional administrative steps or forms will be needed, and we assist clients in managing those interactions to ensure the court’s order is properly implemented and recorded where necessary.
Costs for a Heggstad Petition depend on the complexity of the case, the amount of preparation and evidence required, court filing fees, and whether the matter is contested. Uncontested petitions with clear documentation typically involve lower costs related mainly to filing fees and preparation of declarations and exhibits. Contested matters can be more expensive due to discovery, additional pleadings, and hearings. It is important to budget for both court costs and the time needed to compile a strong evidentiary record. Many clients find that the expense of a targeted petition is reasonable compared to the potential time and expense of full probate or prolonged disputes. We discuss anticipated costs during an initial consultation and work to provide transparent information about fees and likely expenses so clients can make informed decisions about proceeding with a petition.
Yes, a Heggstad Petition can be appropriate for assets acquired shortly before death if evidence supports that the settlor intended those assets to be part of the trust. Courts will consider the circumstances of the acquisition, related documents, and any communications that indicate the settlor’s plan. Purchase documents, settlement statements, or contemporaneous actions showing intent to fund the trust can be persuasive evidence for the court when deciding such petitions. Because these situations often involve close timing or incomplete administrative steps, clear documentation and credible declarations are particularly important. The court evaluates the totality of evidence, so organizing that record carefully and demonstrating the settlor’s plan to include the asset in the trust improves the likelihood of a favorable determination and subsequent implementation of trust administration steps.
If someone objects to a Heggstad Petition, the court will consider the objection as part of the proceeding and may schedule a hearing to resolve factual disputes. Objections can raise issues about the sufficiency of evidence, the settlor’s intent, or competing claims to the asset. The court evaluates the credibility of declarations and documentary evidence, and it may require additional proof or testimony before issuing a ruling. Preparing to address objections with organized evidence and clear legal arguments is essential to moving the matter to resolution. Objections do not necessarily prevent a petition from succeeding, but they can extend the timeline and require more detailed preparation. Where disputes arise, the court’s process helps ensure all parties have an opportunity to be heard and that the final decision is based on the available record. Effective handling of objections focuses on clarifying misunderstandings and presenting compelling supporting documentation for the petition.
To begin the process, gather copies of the trust document, deeds, account statements, and any communications or records that show the settlor intended the asset to be part of the trust. Also prepare a list of potential interested parties such as heirs, beneficiaries, and known creditors who must be notified. Contacting our office by phone at 408-528-2827 or through an initial consultation allows us to review your materials, assess whether a Heggstad Petition is appropriate, and outline the evidence needed to proceed. We can assist with organizing documentation, preparing declarations, and managing the service and filing requirements for the petition. Early case evaluation helps identify potential obstacles, estimate timelines, and determine whether informal resolution is possible or a court determination will be required to protect trustee actions and finalize trust administration.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas