A Heggstad Petition can be the key to confirming that real property was properly transferred into a living trust even when the deed or documentation is incomplete. If you live in Rio Vista or elsewhere in Solano County and need clarity about whether a property belongs to a trust, the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman can walk you through the legal process and options. This page explains what a Heggstad Petition is, when it may be needed, how the process works in California courts, and what steps you can take to protect your family’s planning goals while avoiding unnecessary probate delays and expense.
A Heggstad Petition is often used when a trust creator intended that property be a trust asset but the public record or paperwork does not reflect that transfer. Addressing these gaps promptly helps preserve the benefits of comprehensive estate planning documents such as revocable living trusts, pour-over wills, and related trust certifications. The discussion here describes how the petition can correct the record, what evidence courts typically consider, and how our firm approaches gathering and presenting necessary documentation. If you have questions about a property transfer to a trust in Rio Vista, contact our office to discuss next steps.
Filing a Heggstad Petition can restore the intended benefits of a properly funded trust by asking the court to declare that property is already a trust asset despite imperfections in the deed or recording. This remedy helps beneficiaries and trustees preserve estate planning goals, reduce delays tied to probate, and avoid disputes during trust administration. The petition process also clarifies ownership for third parties, such as title companies or lenders, which can remove barriers to sale or refinancing. Ultimately, seeking a judicial declaration through a Heggstad Petition can provide legal certainty and peace of mind for families dealing with unclear records.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman represent clients throughout the Bay Area and Solano County on matters related to estate planning and trust administration, including Heggstad Petitions. Drawing on years of practice focused on estate documents such as revocable living trusts, pour-over wills, and trust modifications, our team guides clients through gathering evidence, preparing pleadings, and presenting a persuasive case in court. We prioritize clear communication about timing, costs, and likely outcomes so clients can make informed decisions. If property ownership for trust purposes is unclear, we provide strategic legal assistance to pursue the most effective resolution.
A Heggstad Petition asks the probate court to determine that property was intended to be part of a trust, even if title documents or records do not reflect the transfer. This petition addresses issues such as clerical errors, omissions when deeds were recorded, or situations when a trustee or grantor believed they had transferred an asset but the deed remained in an individual’s name. The court examines evidence of intent, the trust document, and other relevant facts to reach a decision. Understanding this remedy helps trustees and beneficiaries decide whether to pursue a petition versus other administrative avenues.
The decision to file a Heggstad Petition typically follows an investigation of the title history and a review of the trust documents and supporting records. Courts consider testimony, contemporaneous documents, transfer declarations, and deeds when available. Pursuing a petition can be more efficient than full probate in some cases, particularly when the only issue is clarifying whether the trust already owns the property. Clients should be prepared to provide clear, documented proof of intent and any relevant transactions to strengthen the petition and minimize the time and expense involved in resolving the matter.
A Heggstad Petition, named for a California court decision, asks a probate court to declare that property was transferred to a trust and that the trust holds legal title despite discrepancies in recorded records. The petition explains the factual basis for the claim, sets out relevant dates and documents, and requests court authority to clarify ownership. This judicial determination allows trustees to administer trust property confidently and helps avoid future title disputes. Filing and prosecuting the petition requires careful preparation of affidavits, documentary evidence, and, in some cases, notice to interested parties so the court may issue an enforceable ruling.
Successful Heggstad Petitions typically include clear evidence of the grantor’s intent to transfer the property to the trust, the trust instrument itself, transactional records such as deeds or escrow instructions, and affidavits from witnesses or professionals involved in the transfer. The process involves filing a petition with the probate court, providing notice to interested parties, and presenting supporting documentation at a hearing. In complex matters, title reports and historical documents may be analyzed to trace ownership. Our approach emphasizes gathering persuasive evidence and explaining how the available proof supports the requested judicial declaration.
Understanding legal terms related to Heggstad Petitions helps clients follow the process and prepare required documentation. Below are plain-language definitions of commonly encountered terms, including trust, trustee, grantor, deed, and adjudication. Each term is explained with relevance to trust funding and court petitions so clients know what documentation or testimony the court will likely consider. Clear definitions reduce confusion and help clients participate fully in assembling evidence and responding to court procedures when seeking a Heggstad declaration for Rio Vista properties.
A trust is a legal arrangement where one person or entity holds property for the benefit of others under the terms of a written trust document. In the context of Heggstad Petitions, the trust is the entity that should own the property at issue. The trust document outlines who the trustees and beneficiaries are, what powers the trustee has, and how trust assets should be managed or distributed. Confirming that a property is held by a trust ensures trustees can transfer, manage, or sell property without resorting to probate, provided the court affirms the trust’s ownership.
A Heggstad Petition is a request to the California probate court for a judicial finding that real property was intended to be transferred into a trust despite missing or imperfect public records. The petition sets out the factual basis for the claim, including documentation or testimony showing intent to transfer. When granted, the court’s order clarifies title and enables trustees to treat the property as a trust asset. This remedy addresses gaps that otherwise could delay estate administration or cloud ownership when the record does not match the parties’ intentions.
A deed is the instrument used to transfer legal title to real property from one person or entity to another. In Heggstad matters, a deed may be missing, incorrectly recorded, or not properly reflect the transfer to a trust. When deeds do not accurately show the trust as owner, a Heggstad Petition helps courts consider other evidence of intent and effectuate the grantor’s wishes. Documents such as escrow instructions, transfer declarations, or contemporaneous correspondence can support a claim that a deed was meant to convey property into the trust.
Probate court adjudication refers to the court’s role in resolving disputes or clarifying property ownership and trust administration issues. A Heggstad Petition asks the probate court to adjudicate whether property is a trust asset despite record imperfections. The court reviews evidence, may hold a hearing, and issues an order that clarifies title. This judicial determination is important because it gives trustees and third parties the legal certainty needed to manage or transfer property without the risk of later challenge based on the public record.
When property intended for a trust lacks clear recorded title, clients have several potential routes: filing a Heggstad Petition to clarify trust ownership, pursuing limited probate remedies if probate is unavoidable, or using administrative trust actions depending on circumstances. A Heggstad Petition addresses title directly without opening a full probate estate, which can save time and expense in suitable cases. However, if the facts reveal additional estate administration issues, other court procedures may be necessary. Evaluating the most efficient path requires careful review of title records, trust documents, and the wishes of the trust’s beneficiaries and trustees.
A limited action such as a Heggstad Petition is often sufficient when there is convincing evidence that the trust creator intended the property to be held by the trust, but paperwork or recordings are lacking or imperfect. Examples include an intended transfer that was initiated in escrow but not reflected in the final deed, or a signed deed that was misrecorded. In such situations, a focused petition allows the court to examine the relevant facts and issue an order confirming trust ownership without resorting to a full probate administration, which can be longer and more costly.
A Heggstad Petition generally works best when beneficiaries, trustees, and other interested parties are not contesting the transfer and are willing to accept a court declaration. When family members and beneficiaries agree that the property was intended to be in the trust, the court can often resolve the issue efficiently through a petition with supporting evidence. This cooperative approach minimizes contested hearings and reduces legal fees, while providing the formal recognition necessary to clear title for banking, title insurance, or real estate transactions tied to the property.
When title histories are complex or competing claims arise, a more comprehensive legal approach may be needed beyond a narrow petition. Multiple transfers, liens, mortgages, or prior ownership disputes can complicate the court’s analysis and require more detailed factual development, including expert witness testimony, title reports, and careful legal pleadings. In these situations, pursuing a fuller litigation strategy and coordinating with title companies or lienholders helps resolve clouds on title so the trustee can manage or transfer property with confidence.
If beneficiaries or other interested parties dispute whether the grantor intended a property to be part of the trust, more extensive legal work is necessary to build a record and present evidence. This may involve depositions, documentary discovery, and contested hearings in probate court. A comprehensive legal response addresses allegations, clarifies factual disputes, and seeks a durable judicial order resolving ownership questions. Preparing a strong factual narrative and legal theory in contested matters increases the likelihood of a definitive ruling that protects the trust’s administration.
A comprehensive review before filing a Heggstad Petition helps identify risks, uncover all relevant documents, and develop a persuasive presentation to the court. Taking time to collect escrow records, prior deeds, transfer correspondence, and witness statements often prevents delays and strengthens the petition. This proactive preparation helps ensure that courts have the evidence they need to rule in favor of the trust’s claimed ownership, thereby reducing the risk of later challenges and enabling trustees to move forward with property management or sale.
Thorough preparation also helps manage expectations regarding timing, costs, and likely outcomes. When potential title issues or creditor claims are identified early, the parties can address these concerns through notice, negotiation, or additional pleadings as needed. A deliberate approach minimizes surprises at hearing and increases the chances of obtaining an order that title companies will accept for issuance of insurance. For families seeking certainty and continuity in estate administration, comprehensive groundwork can make the difference between a swift court determination and protracted litigation.
Careful legal work results in a stronger court record and a clearer judicial order, which in turn provides trustees and beneficiaries with greater certainty about property ownership. This clarity reduces the risk of later challenges and facilitates transactions such as refinancing, sale, or distribution of trust assets. When a formal court declaration aligns the record with the trust instrument, trustees can act on behalf of beneficiaries with confidence that their decisions are supported by the court’s finding, leading to smoother administration and fewer post-judgment disputes.
A well-supported Heggstad Petition can enable title companies and lenders to accept the trust’s ownership and insure transactions involving the property. By anticipating title company concerns and addressing lien or recording issues in advance, the process of clearing title becomes more predictable. This improved readiness facilitates real estate transactions, refinancing, or distributions to beneficiaries, minimizing administrative obstacles. Preparing a complete factual presentation to the court often streamlines the path from filing to obtaining the order that allows routine estate and property matters to proceed.
Collecting supporting documents is one of the most important steps when preparing a Heggstad Petition. This includes the trust instrument, any deeds related to the property, escrow instructions, transfer declarations, and contemporaneous communications reflecting the grantor’s intent. Affidavits from individuals involved in the transfer process or professionals who handled estate planning matters can be valuable. Thorough documentation reduces ambiguity for the court and helps explain why the property should be treated as a trust asset despite imperfections in the recorded title, thereby increasing the petition’s likelihood of success.
Coordinating with title companies, escrow officers, or lenders early in the process can identify additional documentation they require to insure transactions after a Heggstad ruling. Title companies may request specific records or a particular form of court order before issuing insurance. Engaging these parties in advance helps anticipate their needs and avoid delays once the court has issued an order. Clear communication between the trustee, counsel, and title professionals supports a smoother transition from court determination to practical ability to refinance, sell, or otherwise manage the property.
Consider a Heggstad Petition whenever title records do not reflect that a trust owns property but there is credible evidence that the grantor intended the asset to be in the trust. Typical scenarios include clerical errors in recording, omitted deeds, or transfers initiated but not completed in public records. Acting sooner rather than later reduces the risk of disputes or third-party claims. A petition offers a formal judicial route to align the public record with estate planning documents, helping trustees and beneficiaries preserve the plan’s objectives and avoid unnecessary probate proceedings.
Another reason to pursue a petition is when real estate transactions are imminent and title companies or lenders require a court declaration before closing. Litigation or delays at closing can be costly; securing a judicial order confirming trust ownership clears the way for sales, refinancing, or distributions. Families also turn to this process when estate administration requires immediate access to property assets but the record’s mismatch prevents action. A Heggstad Petition is a focused remedy to address these situations efficiently when the factual record supports the requested finding.
Common circumstances triggering a Heggstad Petition include deeds that were intended to be recorded in the trust’s name but were not, transfers that were completed in escrow but never properly recorded, and situations where a grantor believed they had retitled property to the trust but the documentation does not reflect that transfer. Other scenarios involve administrative oversights during estate planning, changes in trusteeship, or lender requirements that demand a court order for title clarity. Recognizing these patterns helps determine whether a petition is the right remedy.
A frequent issue arises when a deed intended to convey property to a trust is missing from public records or was recorded incorrectly. This can occur due to clerical mistakes, incomplete escrow processing, or miscommunication among parties handling the transfer. When records do not match the trust’s documented intent, obtaining a court declaration through a Heggstad Petition can correct the public record and confirm trust ownership. Doing so allows trustees to administer or convey property consistent with the estate plan and reduces uncertainty for potential buyers or lenders.
Sometimes transfers initiated through escrow or other channels create documentation that indicates an intent to fund a trust, but the final public record lacks a direct deed to the trust. These documentary gaps can leave trustees unable to act on property assets. A Heggstad Petition presents the available evidence to the court to establish that the grantor intended the transfer to the trust, enabling the trustee to treat the property as a trust asset without pursuing full probate. Addressing these gaps protects beneficiaries and simplifies administration.
Title companies and lenders often require a formal court order when recorded title does not match the trust document before they will insure a transaction or approve refinancing. When this occurs, a Heggstad Petition can provide the necessary judicial confirmation to satisfy their underwriting standards. Preparing a well-supported petition that anticipates the title company’s needs increases the chance the court order will be accepted for issuance of title insurance or loan approval, helping trustees complete sales or financing without protracted delays.
If you reside in Rio Vista and face uncertainty about whether a property is part of a trust, we are available to help evaluate the situation and recommend the appropriate course of action. Our firm assists with gathering relevant documentation, preparing the Heggstad Petition, providing required notices, and representing trustees at hearings when necessary. We emphasize clear communication and practical solutions so clients understand likely timelines and outcomes. Contact us to schedule a consultation and begin assembling the records needed to support a petition or explore alternative remedies.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman focus on estate planning and trust administration matters for individuals and families throughout the Bay Area. We bring a methodical approach to Heggstad Petitions, emphasizing thorough document review and clear legal strategy tailored to each client’s circumstances. Our goal is to secure the court rulings needed to align property records with the trust’s provisions so trustees can manage assets with minimal disruption. We guide clients through each step and maintain open communication about options, timing, and potential outcomes.
When undertaking a Heggstad Petition, clients benefit from an advocate who understands both the legal standards courts apply and the practical expectations of title companies and other stakeholders. We prepare petitions with an eye toward the evidence courts consider persuasive, while also addressing the procedural requirements for notice and hearing. This balanced approach helps minimize delays and increase the likelihood that a court order will be accepted for transactional purposes, such as sale or refinancing of trust property.
We also help clients understand related estate planning matters that may surface during petition preparation, including revocable living trusts, pour-over wills, advance health care directives, and powers of attorney. If additional planning or trust modification is advisable to avoid similar issues in the future, we explain options in plain language and assist with implementing durable, practical solutions that support long-term family goals and reduce the chance of title or administration problems going forward.
Our process begins with a thorough intake and review of the trust document, title history, and any escrow or deed-related paperwork you can provide. We identify gaps and compile supporting declarations, correspondence, and records that reflect the grantor’s intent. After drafting the petition and required notices, we file with the probate court and manage service to interested parties. If a hearing is needed, we present the factual and legal basis for the petition and work to obtain an order that resolving the ownership question, providing trustees and beneficiaries the clarity they need to proceed.
The first step is collecting the trust document, deeds, escrow files, title reports, and any correspondence or records reflecting the transfer intent. We also identify potential notice recipients and any possible competing claims. A careful assessment of the facts informs whether a Heggstad Petition is appropriate or whether alternative remedies should be pursued. This stage establishes the factual foundation for the petition and helps estimate likely timelines and costs associated with court filing and any necessary hearings.
We request the full trust instrument, all amendments, and any documents evidencing the grantor’s attempt to retitle real property into the trust. Escrow instructions, signed deeds, transfer declarations, and title reports are reviewed to build a narrative that supports the requested court finding. Witness statements and affidavits from those involved in the transfer can strengthen the file. Comprehensive collection of these records helps prepare a persuasive petition and reduces the need for follow-up discovery or supplemental filings.
We analyze the title history to identify recorded owners, liens, and other encumbrances. Determining who must be given notice and who may have an interest in the property is essential for proper service and court compliance. Early identification of parties who need to be notified reduces the risk of procedural challenges and helps frame the scope of the petition. This evaluation also informs whether coordination with title companies or lenders will be required to secure post-judgment transactions.
After assembling the evidence and identifying interested parties, we prepare the Heggstad Petition and supporting declarations for filing with the probate court. The pleading sets forth the factual basis for the requested determination and attaches key documents. We ensure all procedural requirements for filing and service are met, including preparing notices for beneficiaries, heirs, and other interested persons. Accurate and well-drafted filings improve the court’s ability to evaluate the claim and shorten the path to a definitive ruling.
Supporting declarations from trustees, witnesses, or professionals provide essential context about the intent to fund the trust and any transfer steps taken. We draft these declarations to highlight relevant facts, attach key documents, and present a coherent factual timeline. Clear presentations of evidence reduce the court’s need for additional discovery or clarifying filings, and they help the judge understand why a judicial declaration is warranted. Well-prepared attachments also aid title companies in evaluating the resulting order.
We file the petition with the probate court and handle the required service to all interested persons, including beneficiaries, heirs, and recorded owners. Proper service and proof of service are essential to protect the finality of the court’s order. Timely and accurate notification helps prevent procedural challenges and encourages potential objectors to raise concerns early. Our team ensures all filings and service paperwork comply with court rules to maintain an efficient path through the judicial process.
If a hearing is scheduled, we present the factual record and legal argument supporting the requested declaration that the property is a trust asset. The court may review declarations, documentary evidence, and testimony before issuing an order. Once the court issues a final order confirming trust ownership, we can assist in recording any necessary documents or obtaining title company confirmation so the trustee can manage, refinance, or sell the property as needed. Our goal is to secure a clear judicial determination that resolves the ownership question.
At the hearing, the court considers the petition, supporting declarations, and any objections. We focus on presenting a concise and persuasive factual narrative that shows the grantor’s intent and the trust’s entitlement to the property. Organizing evidence for effective presentation helps the court reach a clear conclusion and limits the need for extended litigation. If objections arise, we address them with documentary support and legal argument tailored to the specific disputes raised by interested parties.
After obtaining the court’s order, we assist with implementing the ruling, which may include recording certified copies, obtaining title insurance endorsements, or coordinating with lenders to reflect the trust’s ownership. Ensuring the order is properly documented and accepted by third parties allows trustees to proceed with sale, refinance, or distribution. We also advise clients about any follow-up steps that reduce the likelihood of future challenges and help maintain a clear and orderly estate administration.
A Heggstad Petition is a legal filing in California probate courts asking the court to declare that real property was intended to be owned by a trust despite imperfections in recording or title documents. Courts consider the totality of the evidence to determine whether the grantor intended the transfer and whether the property should be recognized as a trust asset. This petition is commonly used when deeds are missing, misrecorded, or when transfer paperwork does not match the trust instrument, and it provides a judicial mechanism to align the public record with the grantor’s planning documents. The petition is appropriate when the factual record indicates the grantor’s clear intent and when interested parties do not have substantial competing claims. It is not a substitute for disputes about the validity of the trust itself or unrelated creditor claims. Instead, it focuses narrowly on whether the property was effectively transferred to the trust and seeks an order to confirm title so trustees can manage or transfer assets consistent with the trust’s terms.
Timing for a Heggstad Petition varies depending on the court’s calendar, the completeness of the supporting documentation, and whether any parties object. In straightforward, uncontested matters with clear evidence, the process can be completed in a few months from filing to order. When additional discovery or contested hearings are necessary, the matter can take longer. Early preparation of declarations, title reports, and notices typically helps shorten the timeline and reduces the potential for scheduling delays that extend the process. Courts also require proper service and waiting periods for responses, which can add to the schedule. Coordination with title companies or lenders may be necessary after the order to secure endorsements or clearances for transactions. Clients should plan for both the court process and any post-order administrative steps needed to implement the court’s decision in real estate or trust administration matters.
Courts evaluating a Heggstad Petition look for evidence demonstrating the grantor’s intent to transfer property into the trust. Relevant evidence often includes the trust document itself, deeds or attempted deeds, escrow instructions, transfer declarations, correspondence or notes indicating intent, and sworn declarations from individuals involved in the transfer process. Contemporaneous records that corroborate the transfer timeline are particularly persuasive. The court weighs the credibility and consistency of the evidence to reach a determination about ownership. In addition to documentary proof, the court may consider testimony from trustees, witnesses, or professionals who assisted with the transfer. Title histories and reports that show a chain of title can also inform the court’s analysis. The goal is to present a coherent factual narrative that explains why the property should be regarded as a trust asset despite imperfections in the recorded record.
A court order from a Heggstad Petition often satisfies title companies and lenders, but acceptance can depend on the specific title company’s underwriting standards and the exact language of the order. Many title companies will issue insurance or provide endorsements once a court has declared property to be part of a trust, particularly when the order is clear and accompanied by supporting records. Coordinating with the title company before or during the process can identify any additional documentation they require to accept the order. Lenders may have separate underwriting requirements and may request proof of the trust’s authority to pledge or convey property. Addressing potential lender or title company conditions early in the preparation process helps ensure the court’s order will function effectively for downstream transactions and reduces the need for supplemental filings or endorsements once the order is obtained.
If a Heggstad Petition is not appropriate because facts are insufficient or parties disagree about intent, alternatives include negotiating a settlement among interested persons, pursuing a trust reformation or modification if the trust instrument contains ambiguities, or initiating limited probate proceedings when necessary. Sometimes informal administrative resolutions, such as obtaining reaffirmation from a title company based on additional documentation, can address the issue without court intervention. Each case requires evaluation to determine the pathway most likely to achieve clarity at reasonable cost. When claims by third parties or creditors complicate the situation, broader probate actions or litigation may be required. In those scenarios, a comprehensive review of all legal and factual issues helps determine whether contesting a claim, negotiating with creditors, or pursuing a different judicial remedy offers the best path forward for preserving trust assets and the grantor’s planning objectives.
Yes, beneficiaries and other interested persons typically must be given notice of a Heggstad Petition so they have a chance to respond or object. Proper notice and proof of service are procedural requirements that help protect the finality of the court’s order. Identifying and notifying beneficiaries, heirs, recorded owners, and other parties with potential interests reduces the risk of procedural challenges and ensures the court can consider any objections before making a determination. Providing thoughtful notices early in the process also promotes transparency and may encourage informal resolution of questions before a hearing. When beneficiaries understand the basis for the petition and the evidence supporting it, many disputes can be resolved through communication, which streamlines the court process and reduces the likelihood of contested proceedings that add time and cost.
A Heggstad Petition can be filed after a grantor has passed away when the trust still exists and the trustee seeks a court determination that property belonged to the trust at the time of death. The petition helps clarify ownership for trust administration and can prevent unnecessary probate for assets that were intended to be trust property. Evidence may include the trust instrument, pre-death transfer documents, and testimony from those familiar with the grantor’s intent during the relevant period. Timing and strategy may differ in post-death scenarios, particularly when heirs or potential opponents assert competing claims. Prompt action to assemble evidence and provide notice is important in these cases. A post-death petition is a common remedy for addressing title inconsistencies that surface during trust administration and estate settlement.
Costs for filing and pursuing a Heggstad Petition vary based on the complexity of the title history, the amount of documentary gathering required, and whether the matter becomes contested. Straightforward, uncontested petitions that rely on available records and declarations generally involve lower legal fees and court filing costs. When additional discovery, title reports, or contested hearings are needed, expenses rise accordingly. We provide clients with estimates and discuss likely ranges so they can make informed choices about proceeding. Courts also charge filing fees and there may be costs for service of process, title reports, and recording documents after the order. Coordinating with title companies or lenders may involve additional administrative fees. Early evaluation and focused preparation help manage costs by minimizing the need for extended litigation and reducing the likelihood of multiple supplemental filings.
Filing a Heggstad Petition does not necessarily open a full probate estate. The petition is a focused probate procedure seeking a declaratory determination about property ownership as it relates to a trust. Unless other probate issues are present or brought before the court, the petition can proceed without full estate administration. Its limited nature is one reason people pursue this remedy to avoid the time and expense associated with probate when the only issue is clarification of trust ownership. However, if the court finds additional unresolved matters such as creditor claims or disputes over the trust’s validity, further probate actions may be required. Proper initial evaluation and careful drafting of the petition help keep the proceeding narrowly focused on the ownership issue and reduce the likelihood of expanding into broader probate administration.
To avoid the need for a Heggstad Petition later, ensure real property transfers into a trust are completed properly at the time of planning and recorded accurately in the county where the property is located. Working with escrow officers and title professionals to confirm deeds are executed and recorded in the trust’s name reduces the likelihood of title discrepancies. Keeping organized records of transfers, escrow communications, and updated title reports also helps maintain clarity in the future and supports transactions that may occur years after the trust is created. Regularly reviewing estate planning documents and title records during life changes such as moves, refinance transactions, or changes in family circumstances prevents inadvertent gaps. Timely updates to trust instruments and consistent documentation of transfers give trustees and beneficiaries a reliable foundation, reducing the chance that court actions will be needed to correct record mismatches.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas