A Heggstad petition can be an important legal step when a deceased person left assets in their name but intended those assets to belong to a trust. Residents of Vallejo and Solano County often encounter this situation when a trust was prepared but some accounts or property were never retitled before the trustmaker passed away. The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman assist families by explaining when a Heggstad petition is appropriate, how California courts view these petitions, and what beneficiaries should expect during the petition process. Our team provides clear guidance on gathering documentation, drafting petitions, and representing clients at court hearings when needed.
Understanding the Heggstad petition process helps families avoid prolonged probate and establishes a path for transferring assets into a trust as the decedent intended. This page explains legal considerations unique to Vallejo and Solano County, highlights common scenarios that lead to Heggstad petitions, and outlines practical steps clients can take to protect beneficiary interests. We emphasize careful documentation, timely filings, and respectful communication with trustees and institutions holding assets. If you are dealing with an asset that remains in a decedent’s name but was meant for a trust, this guide will help clarify options and next steps under California law.
A Heggstad petition provides a judicial mechanism to confirm that certain assets held in the name of a deceased person should be transferred to a trust, which helps honor the decedent’s intentions and secure timely distribution to beneficiaries. This approach can prevent assets from becoming trapped in probate, reduce delay, and provide clarity for financial institutions hesitant to accept trust-based documentation alone. For families in Vallejo, moving assets into the trust can simplify estate administration, minimize fees, and protect privacy. The petition process also creates a public record that resolves disputes and reduces the risk of future challenges by concerned parties.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman focus on estate planning and trust administration for clients across the Bay Area, including Vallejo and Solano County. Our approach emphasizes practical solutions, careful document review, and thoughtful client communication to resolve issues related to Heggstad petitions and trust transfers. We help clients gather supporting evidence, prepare court filings, and work with institutions to achieve transfers as efficiently as possible. Our goal is to reduce stress for families by explaining options in plain terms and pursuing strategies that align with the client’s objectives and California law.
A Heggstad petition asks the probate court to recognize that certain assets titled in the decedent’s name should be treated as trust property, allowing transfer without formal probate administration. This process can be relied upon when a trust exists but the decedent neglected to retitle bank accounts, brokerage accounts, or real property. In Solano County, local court procedures and evidence requirements may influence how a petition is presented. Typical supporting documentation includes the trust instrument, affidavits, account statements, and declarations showing the decedent intended the assets to be held by the trust during life.
Filing a Heggstad petition requires clear factual evidence and proper legal framing. The petitioner must show the court that the decedent had a trust and intended the asset to be part of that trust, often relying on trust language, beneficiary designations, or trustee actions. Courts assess whether the record establishes the trustmaker’s intent and whether any procedural rules were followed. When institutions resist transfer, a court order obtained through a Heggstad petition can provide the necessary legal authority to effectuate the transfer and protect beneficiaries from future claims.
A Heggstad petition is a legal request that asks a probate court to confirm a decedent’s assets should be transferred to a trust despite the asset remaining titled in the decedent’s name. The petition is named after a California case that set precedent for courts to consider when a trustmaker intended assets to belong to a trust. It is used to remedy oversights such as accounts not retitled, deeds not recorded, or assets left out of formal trust funding. The petition explains the factual background, provides supporting documents, and seeks a court determination that clears title and allows trustee action consistent with the trust terms.
Preparing a Heggstad petition involves gathering documentary proof, drafting a clear petition, serving interested parties, and presenting the matter to the probate court. Essential documents often include the trust instrument, death certificate, account statements, deeds, and declarations from those who witnessed the trustmaker’s intent. Notice must be provided to heirs, beneficiaries, and sometimes creditors, following California rules. After filing, a court may schedule a hearing where evidence is reviewed and the judge decides whether to grant an order transferring the asset into the trust, thereby facilitating administration by the trustee.
This section explains commonly used terms and concepts in Heggstad petitions to help clients navigate the process. Definitions cover the trust, trustee, trustmaker, beneficiaries, probate court, and transfer of title. Understanding these terms helps clarify what the court is being asked to decide and what documentation will support the petition. Clear definitions also help families communicate effectively with financial institutions and courts, and ensure the correct parties receive notice when a petition is filed in Solano County or other California jurisdictions.
Trustmaker refers to the person who created the trust and transferred property into it during life or by will. A trust is a legal arrangement where one person or entity holds property for the benefit of designated beneficiaries under written terms. In Heggstad petition situations, the trustmaker intended certain assets to be governed by the trust, but some property remained titled in the trustmaker’s name at death. Demonstrating the trustmaker’s intent and the trust’s existence is central to obtaining a court order recognizing those assets as trust property.
A trustee is the individual or entity named to manage and distribute trust property according to the trust’s terms. The trustee’s duties include gathering assets, paying debts, and distributing assets to beneficiaries. When a Heggstad petition is granted, it clarifies that the trustee has authority over the newly recognized trust asset, enabling the trustee to act on behalf of beneficiaries. Trustee actions must follow the trust instrument and applicable California law, and trustees owe fiduciary responsibilities to act in the beneficiaries’ best interests while administering the trust property.
Probate court handles disputes and orders related to wills, trusts, estates, and conservatorships. In Heggstad petition cases, the probate court evaluates evidence and issues an order confirming that certain assets belong to a trust. Jurisdiction typically lies with the court in the county where the decedent resided, such as Solano County for Vallejo residents. The court reviews documentation and legal arguments, and its order provides institutions with the authority to transfer title or release funds to the trustee for trust administration.
Notice refers to the legal requirement to inform heirs, beneficiaries, and certain creditors about a pending petition so they have an opportunity to object. Interested parties may include those named in the trust, potential heirs under intestate succession rules, and beneficiaries under a will or other instruments. Proper notice ensures the court’s decision is binding and reduces the chance of later challenges. The method and timing of notice must follow California probate rules, and documentation of service is typically filed with the court to demonstrate compliance.
When an asset remains in a decedent’s name, families can consider a Heggstad petition or other legal approaches depending on the asset type, value, and likelihood of dispute. For small accounts, financial institutions sometimes permit transfer using a trustee declaration and supporting documents without a court order, while larger or contested assets may require formal court action. Alternatives may include a limited probate administration or settlement agreements among interested parties. Evaluating the least disruptive path requires understanding the asset’s title, institutional policies, and the potential for objections from heirs or creditors.
Some banks and financial institutions will accept trust documentation, a death certificate, and trustee identification to transfer small accounts into a trust without court involvement. This approach can be faster and less costly than filing a Heggstad petition, and it is often suitable when all interested parties agree and there is no dispute. For Vallejo residents, local branches may have procedures to handle these transfers, but requirements vary by institution. It is important to verify the specific paperwork required and to document the institution’s acceptance to avoid future disagreements.
When the trust document clearly identifies the asset and beneficiaries, and heirs are cooperative, parties may be able to complete a transfer without involving the court. Clear signatures, beneficiary designations consistent with the trust, and corroborating statements from trustees or witnesses can persuade institutions to accept a transfer. Choosing this route requires careful attention to documentation to ensure the receiving institution is satisfied. If questions arise later, having detailed records of communications and documents will help justify the transfer and protect trustees and beneficiaries.
If heirs or other parties contest whether an asset belongs to a trust, a Heggstad petition provides a formal proceeding where the court can evaluate evidence and issue a binding order. Disputes can involve unclear documentation, conflicting beneficiary designations, or competing claims under a will. In these situations, having the petition process available helps establish a definitive legal ruling, preventing ongoing uncertainty and potential future litigation. The court’s order gives financial institutions clear authority to transfer title and reduces exposure for trustees who act under the order.
Some institutions will not release funds or retitle property without a court order, especially when the asset is substantial or when internal compliance policies raise concerns. When a bank, brokerage, or title company insists on judicial authorization, a Heggstad petition is the reliable way to obtain that order and move the asset into the trust. While the court process involves filings and potential hearings, the resulting order simplifies subsequent transactions by providing documented authority for the trustee to administer or distribute the asset according to the trust terms.
A comprehensive approach that includes filing a Heggstad petition provides legal certainty, reduces the risk of future challenges, and ensures institutions comply with the court order. This method creates a clear public record that the asset was intended to be part of the trust, which is especially valuable for higher-value property or situations involving potential disputes among heirs. Obtaining a court order also protects trustees by giving them documented authority to manage and distribute the asset in accordance with the trust document.
Pursuing a petition may involve additional time and expense compared with informal transfers, but the long-term advantages include finality and reduced exposure to later claims. For families in Vallejo and Solano County, the court-based route can prevent delays in trust administration and avoid unexpected obstacles when selling or transferring assets. The recorded court order often streamlines interactions with banks and title companies, allowing trustees to proceed with confidence in settling affairs for beneficiaries.
A court order resolving the status of an asset provides finality that informal transfers may lack, and it clarifies ownership for all interested parties. This can be particularly important when creditors or heirs might later question the distribution. Court recognition reduces the likelihood of costly litigation down the road, as the judicial determination is binding and enforceable. The order can also ease title issues for real estate and provide banks with the documentation they need to release funds to the trustee for administration under the trust terms.
By securing a court order, trustees gain documented authority to act without fear of liability for transferring or distributing assets as directed by the trust instrument. Beneficiaries benefit from a documented resolution that safeguards their inheritance and reduces the chance of later disputes. The process also creates a clear administrative path for dealing with complex assets or institutional resistance. For families in Solano County, the protection afforded by a judicial determination can be essential to achieving efficient and defensible trust administration.
Begin collecting the trust document, death certificate, account statements, deeds, and any correspondence showing the decedent’s intent as soon as possible. Clear documentation can make the difference between an uncontested transfer and a contested matter requiring a court hearing. Record witness statements and trustee declarations that support the trustmaker’s intent. Early organization helps streamline communication with financial institutions and the probate court in Solano County, and it will make any necessary petition filings more persuasive and efficient in resolving the asset issue.
Evaluate the likely costs and timeline of filing a petition compared with alternative approaches such as informal transfers or limited probate administration. While a court petition may take longer and involve fees, it often provides finality for significant assets or contested situations. Weigh the value of the asset, the potential for disputes, and the institution’s stance on transfers. Planning ahead and understanding local court timelines in Solano County will help set realistic expectations and ensure beneficiaries receive distributions as efficiently as possible.
Consider a Heggstad petition when a trust exists but certain assets remain titled in the decedent’s name, when financial institutions refuse to transfer property without a court order, or when heirs dispute ownership and a definitive court ruling is needed. Other triggers include incomplete trust funding at the time of death, real property with title issues, and accounts with ambiguous beneficiary designations. The petition helps align asset ownership with the trustmaker’s intent and allows trustees to manage assets in accordance with the trust document, providing a practical path forward for families in Vallejo and Solano County.
Families should also consider a petition when the asset in question is significant in value, when timely distribution matters, or when there is a risk that informal transfers could be challenged later. Even when all parties currently agree, obtaining a court order may prevent future litigation and ensure the trustee can move forward confidently. Evaluating the facts of each case, the institution’s policies, and the interests of beneficiaries will determine whether a Heggstad petition or another approach is the most appropriate way to protect family assets and honor the trustmaker’s wishes.
Typical situations include bank and brokerage accounts left in the decedent’s name, deeds not recorded to reflect trust ownership, retirement plan assets with unclear designations, and other property that was intended for the trust but not properly retitled. Life changes or oversight can result in incomplete trust funding, and these oversights often surface after a death when institutions request additional proof. When informal transfers are not possible due to institutional policies or potential disputes, a Heggstad petition provides a formal remedy that clarifies ownership for trustees and beneficiaries.
It is common to find bank or investment accounts still titled in the decedent’s name after death, even when the person intended those accounts to be held in a trust. Financial institutions often require either explicit trust documentation they accept or a court order to transfer funds. In these cases, a Heggstad petition can demonstrate the trustmaker’s intent and provide the legal authority for the trustee to access the funds. Proper documentation and a well-structured petition help resolve the matter efficiently while protecting beneficiaries’ rights.
Real property occasionally remains in the decedent’s individual name rather than being deeded to the trust, creating title complications for the trustee. Lenders, title companies, and buyers typically require clear evidence of the owner’s authority to convey or manage property. A Heggstad petition can be used to obtain a court order that clarifies the property’s status and allows the trustee to transfer or sell the property according to the trust terms. Addressing title issues promptly can prevent delays in administration and potential obstacles to selling assets.
Conflicts between beneficiary designations, will provisions, and trust terms can create uncertainty about asset ownership. When designations or documents point to different outcomes, parties may disagree about whether an asset belongs to the trust. Filing a Heggstad petition asks the court to weigh the evidence and resolve these conflicts by determining the asset’s intended ownership. The court’s determination helps ensure assets are distributed in accord with the trustmaker’s intent and provides a defensible resolution for trustees and beneficiaries.
For Vallejo and Solano County residents, prompt assistance with Heggstad petitions can help move assets into trust administration and reduce delays. The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provides personalized attention to review trust documents, collect necessary evidence, and determine the best strategy for transfer. We coordinate with financial institutions, prepare required filings, and represent clients at hearings when court involvement is necessary. Our local experience helps us navigate Solano County practices while focusing on practical solutions to complete trust funding and protect beneficiary interests.
Choosing a law firm to handle a Heggstad petition involves evaluating the firm’s knowledge of California trust and probate practice, its attention to detail, and its ability to communicate clearly with clients and institutions. The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman brings focused experience in estate planning and trust administration, assisting clients through each step of the petition process. We prioritize thorough documentation, practical solutions, and steady guidance to ensure petitions are well-supported and prepared for local court procedures and institutional requirements in Vallejo and Solano County.
Our work emphasizes collaboration with trustees, beneficiaries, and financial institutions to find efficient pathways for transferring assets into trusts. We explain the risks and benefits of informal transfers versus filing a petition and help clients choose the most appropriate strategy. Timely communication, careful evidence gathering, and clear court filings improve the chances of a smooth resolution and help avoid unnecessary disputes. Clients appreciate a respectful and proactive approach when addressing sensitive family estate matters.
When court involvement is required, we prepare persuasive filings and represent clients in hearings to secure the orders needed for trust administration. For matters that can be resolved without litigation, we document agreements and institutional acceptance to create a strong record supporting transfers. Our goal is to minimize delays, reduce uncertainty, and provide trustees with the legal authority needed to fulfill trust obligations. Families receive practical advice tailored to the facts of their case and the local probate environment.
Our process begins with a careful review of the trust documents, asset titles, and any supporting evidence that shows the decedent intended the assets to be held by the trust. We then advise on the likelihood of an informal transfer versus the need for a petition, outline required notice and documentation, and prepare the petition and supporting declarations. We handle service to interested parties, file pleadings with the Solano County probate court, and represent clients at hearings as necessary. Throughout, we keep clients informed and focused on achieving timely resolution for trust administration.
The first step involves reviewing all estate planning documents, account records, deeds, and relevant communications to determine the best strategy for transferring the asset into the trust. We assess whether an institution will accept documentation without a court order and whether interested parties are likely to object. This strategy session identifies key witnesses, compiles supporting evidence, and establishes a plan for notice and filings. A careful review helps avoid unnecessary filings and positions the case for an efficient resolution tailored to the asset and the family’s needs.
We scrutinize the trust instrument for language that supports the inclusion of the asset and verify titling of accounts and property. Identifying inconsistencies or missing documents early allows us to address issues proactively and determine which institutions require additional proof. If declarations from the trustee or witnesses are helpful, we prepare those statements to strengthen the factual record. This preparatory work forms the foundation for a persuasive petition and reduces the risk of objections or procedural setbacks in court.
We contact relevant banks, brokerages, and title companies to learn their transfer policies and document requirements. Understanding these institutional hurdles helps shape whether we pursue an informal transfer or file a petition. We document each institution’s conditions in writing and plan next steps to satisfy their demands. Anticipating obstacles and creating a checklist of necessary paperwork increases the likelihood of timely transfer, reduces unexpected delays, and allows us to present a well-supported case if court involvement becomes necessary.
If a court order is necessary, we prepare a Heggstad petition with clear factual declarations and supporting exhibits, including the trust document, death certificate, and asset records. We draft the petition to explain the decedent’s intent and the legal grounds for treating the asset as trust property. Notice to interested parties is arranged in accordance with California probate rules. Our filings aim to be thorough and persuasive to the Solano County probate court, reducing the likelihood of continued disputes and facilitating a timely hearing if needed.
We draft declarations from trustees, witnesses, and other knowledgeable parties that describe the trustmaker’s intent and the circumstances surrounding the asset’s titling. Exhibits such as account statements, deeds, and prior correspondence are organized to present a coherent factual narrative for the court. These materials are critical to demonstrating entitlement and persuading the court that the asset should be recognized as trust property. Careful attention to the presentation of evidence increases the chances of a favorable ruling.
We file the petition with the Solano County probate court and handle service of notice to heirs, beneficiaries, and other interested parties in compliance with California law. Proper service provides the court with jurisdiction to act and gives parties an opportunity to object. We also prepare proof of service and any supplemental documents the court may require. Timely and accurate filings help avoid procedural challenges and prepare the matter for hearing if objections are raised or the court requests additional information.
If the court schedules a hearing, we present the petition, supporting evidence, and legal argument to the judge. We address any objections or questions from the court and demonstrate why the asset should be recognized as trust property. When the court is persuaded, it issues an order directing transfer of the asset into the trust or authorizing the trustee to act. That order becomes the formal basis for institutions to retitle accounts or release funds and allows trustees to proceed with trust administration.
At the hearing, we explain the factual record and legal basis for the petition and address any objections that interested parties raise. We clarify ambiguities in documentation and provide witness testimony if necessary. The goal is to show that the trustmaker intended the asset to belong to the trust and that the trustee should have authority to manage it. Effective presentation of evidence and reasoned legal argument help the court reach a clear decision that facilitates transfer to the trust.
Once the court issues an order, we assist in implementing the transfer by presenting the order to the relevant institutions and completing any following documentation they require. The order serves as official authorization to retitle accounts, transfer funds, or convey real property into the trust. We coordinate with trustees and institutions to finalize the process and ensure that the asset is properly administered under the trust terms. This post-order work closes the loop and helps beneficiaries receive their distributions as intended.
A Heggstad petition is a court filing that asks the probate court to declare certain assets held in the decedent’s name should be treated as trust property and transferred to the trustee. It is commonly used when a trust exists but some assets were never retitled or recorded in the trust’s name before the trustmaker passed away. The petition sets out the facts and legal reasons why the asset belongs to the trust and requests a judicial order to correct title or permit the trustee to access the asset for trust administration. For many families, this petition resolves institutional hesitancy to transfer assets and creates a clear legal basis for the trustee to act. Filing a petition requires presenting supporting evidence such as the trust document, death certificate, account or title records, and declarations from witnesses. The court evaluates whether the trustmaker intended the asset to be part of the trust, and if satisfied, issues an order allowing the transfer. The resulting court order is then used to persuade banks, brokerages, or title companies to retitle accounts or release funds to the trustee. This process provides an authoritative remedy to align asset ownership with the trustmaker’s intent and facilitate trust administration.
The timeline for a Heggstad petition in Solano County can vary depending on the complexity of the case, whether interested parties object, and the court’s calendar. Some uncontested petitions with clear documentation and cooperative parties can be resolved in a matter of weeks to a few months. More complex matters, objections, or scheduling delays may extend the process. Preparing thorough documentation and clear declarations at the outset can help expedite the matter and reduce the chance of further inquiry or supplemental filings. Local court practices and required notice periods affect the schedule, so planning for potential service and response times is important. Engaging early with financial institutions to learn their requirements can also influence timing, because some assets may be transferred informally without a petition, which can be faster. When a hearing is required, the court’s calendar will determine the specific date and any additional time needed to prepare and submit further evidence.
Key documents typically include the original or a certified copy of the trust instrument, the decedent’s death certificate, account statements, deeds, and any beneficiary designations that relate to the asset. Declarations from trustees, witnesses, or others familiar with the trustmaker’s intent are helpful to explain the circumstances and demonstrate that the asset was meant to be part of the trust. Correspondence with institutions that shows previous efforts to retitle accounts or their specific requirements can also support a petition. Courts may request additional evidence depending on the asset type and the presence of objections. Real property may require title reports or recorded documents, while financial accounts should include statements showing ownership and balances. Providing a clear and organized packet of exhibits reduces the likelihood of delays and clarifies the factual basis for the court’s determination that the asset belongs to the trust.
Institutions vary in their willingness to transfer bank accounts to a trust without a court order. Some banks will accept the trust document, a death certificate, and trustee identification to retitle smaller accounts, while others require a court order before releasing funds or changing title, particularly for larger accounts or when compliance concerns exist. Policies are institution-specific, so it is important to obtain written confirmation of their requirements and to document all communications. If an institution insists on a court order, a Heggstad petition provides the judicial authority needed to complete the transfer. Obtaining an order not only satisfies institutional demands but also protects trustees by demonstrating clear legal authorization to act. The court’s order becomes the official record that institutions rely upon to process transfers and avoid future liability.
Yes, beneficiaries and heirs can object to a Heggstad petition if they believe an asset should not be treated as trust property or if they contest the trustmaker’s intent. When objections are raised, the court will consider the evidence from all parties and decide based on the record. The presence of objections can prolong the process, require additional evidence, and may lead to a contested hearing where witnesses testify and documents are examined in detail. To minimize disputes, thorough preparation and clear documentation of the trustmaker’s intent are essential. Providing declarations from witnesses and trustees, as well as records showing the asset’s connection to the trust, helps address objections. If disagreements persist, the court’s role is to evaluate the evidence and issue an order that resolves the matter for all interested parties.
Costs for a Heggstad petition can include court filing fees, service fees, costs for obtaining certified documents, and attorney fees if legal representation is retained. The total expense depends on the complexity of the case, the need for witness declarations or expert reports, and whether the matter is contested. Simple, uncontested petitions with cooperative institutions typically incur lower costs, while contested matters or those requiring extensive evidence and hearings are more expensive due to additional time and resources required. Considering the value of the asset and the potential for future disputes helps determine whether the cost of filing a petition is justified. In many cases, obtaining a court order prevents longer-term expenses and delays associated with contested administration or unclear title, making the petition a cost-effective solution to secure definitive ownership and facilitate trust administration.
A Heggstad petition addresses a specific issue regarding assets that were intended for a trust but remain titled in the decedent’s name. It can help avoid a broader probate administration for those particular assets by securing a court order that transfers them to the trust. However, whether probate is entirely avoided depends on the full scope of the decedent’s assets and how other property is titled or designated. A petition is one tool to reduce the assets that need probate proceedings if the court recognizes them as trust property. If significant assets are properly transferred to the trust via petition or informal retitling, the remaining estate may be smaller and potentially avoid full probate administration. Each matter is fact specific, and a careful review of all assets, titles, and beneficiary designations will determine the extent to which probate can be limited or avoided through petitions and other administrative actions.
A court order is legally binding, and institutions are generally required to comply once served with the order. If an institution refuses to follow a valid court order, the trustee may return to the court for enforcement remedies, which could include contempt proceedings or requests for additional court directions to compel compliance. Documenting the institution’s refusal and the steps taken to present the order is important to support enforcement efforts. Before initiating enforcement, it is often helpful to communicate with the institution’s legal or compliance department to resolve misunderstandings. If informal resolution fails, the court can provide the necessary authority to enforce the order, ensuring the trustee can obtain access or retitle property as directed by the court and trust terms.
A Heggstad petition differs from a full probate proceeding in that it focuses narrowly on recognizing specific assets as trust property rather than administering the decedent’s entire estate through probate. Probate is a comprehensive process addressing all estate assets, creditor claims, and distributions under a will or intestate succession rules. A petition is a targeted remedy used when a trust exists but certain items were not properly funded into the trust during the trustmaker’s lifetime. Because a petition asks the court to resolve the status of particular assets, it can reduce the need for broader probate administration for those items. The petition process is generally more streamlined than full probate when the facts are clear and parties are cooperative, but contested matters may require more extensive court involvement similar to probate litigation.
Begin by gathering the trust document, death certificate, account statements, deeds, and any correspondence that shows the decedent intended the asset to be held by the trust. Talk to the trustee and potential witnesses who can confirm the trustmaker’s intent and collect declarations if possible. Contact the financial institutions involved to learn their transfer requirements and request written confirmation of what they will accept for retitling. This preparation helps determine whether an informal transfer is feasible or whether a petition is needed. Organize the documents and consider consulting with counsel to evaluate the strength of the evidence and develop a plan. If a petition appears necessary, counsel can assist in drafting declarations, preparing exhibits, and handling notice and court filings in Solano County. Early planning and documentation increase the likelihood of a smooth transfer and reduce the risk of contested proceedings.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas