If you are considering changing the terms of an existing trust in Camp Meeker, a trust modification petition can be a practical path forward. This guide explains when modifications are appropriate, how petitions are filed, and what outcomes you can expect when addressing changes to distribution terms, trustee duties, or beneficiaries. The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman assists clients with tailored planning and representation across Sonoma County, helping you weigh the legal requirements and potential implications of a modification while protecting family relationships and financial objectives.
Trust modification petitions are often pursued when circumstances change or when a trust’s provisions no longer reflect the settlor’s intentions. Whether changes arise from family events, tax considerations, or errors in original documents, the petition process requires careful preparation and clear factual support. Our team provides guidance on gathering necessary documentation, explaining statutory standards under California law, and anticipating possible objections from beneficiaries. We focus on practical strategies to move a petition toward a timely and cost-effective resolution while preserving the integrity of the trust’s purpose and the settlor’s wishes.
Filing a trust modification petition can resolve conflicts, correct drafting mistakes, and update an estate plan to reflect current family dynamics or financial circumstances. Benefits include clarifying distribution schemes, replacing or removing trustees who are no longer able to serve, and adjusting provisions to reduce tax exposure or administrative burden. A properly prepared petition provides a legal path for courts to approve changes when informal amendments are not possible, offering certainty and enforceability for beneficiaries and fiduciaries alike. Thoughtful planning before filing reduces delays and the risk of contested proceedings that could drain trust assets.
Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman has assisted clients with trust and estate planning matters from our San Jose base while serving communities across Sonoma County, including Camp Meeker. Our approach emphasizes clear communication, practical problem solving, and a thorough understanding of California trust law. We help clients evaluate whether a petition, amendment, or alternate remedy best fits their objectives, working collaboratively to prepare required pleadings, gather supporting evidence, and represent our clients in court when necessary. Our goal is to secure results that respect family relationships and preserve the estate’s value for designated beneficiaries.
A trust modification petition asks the court to approve a change to an existing trust where informal amendment is impractical or impossible. Reasons for filing include the settlor’s loss of capacity, ambiguous or erroneous trust language, changed tax laws, or unforeseen family circumstances. The petition typically outlines the reasons for modification, the specific changes sought, and evidence supporting those changes, such as declarations, medical records, or contemporaneous communications. Courts balance the settlor’s original intent with current realities to determine whether the proposed modification honors the trust’s fundamental purpose while complying with statutory standards.
Before filing, it is important to consider alternatives such as a trust amendment signed by the settlor, trustee-consent modifications, or decanting where permitted. When direct amendment is not available, court petitions can provide a final remedy but often require a higher level of documentation and notice to parties. Beneficiaries may raise objections based on perceived loss of benefits or concerns about the settlor’s capacity at the time of proposed changes. Careful case assessment and early communication with interested parties can reduce friction and increase the likelihood of a favorable outcome.
A trust modification petition is a formal request filed with the probate court seeking judicial authorization to alter one or more provisions of a trust. Unlike informal amendments that the settlor can execute while competent, a petition is often necessary when capacity is in question or when the trust document contains ambiguous language that prevents straightforward interpretation. The petition must explain the legal basis for the requested change, identify parties with notice rights, and provide supporting evidence. The court evaluates whether the modification reflects the settlor’s intent and whether it is consistent with the terms and overall purpose of the trust.
A successful petition requires careful preparation of the pleading, proper legal notices to all beneficiaries and interested parties, and persuasive factual and legal support. Typical elements include a clear statement of the terms to be modified, the reason for the modification, evidence of the settlor’s intent or present circumstances, and a proposed order for the court to enter. The process often involves response periods during which beneficiaries can object, possible discovery if disputes arise, and a hearing where the judge evaluates the supporting evidence and arguments. Managing timelines and communication throughout the process is essential to avoid unnecessary delays.
Understanding common terms helps clients make informed decisions. This glossary covers frequently used concepts in trust modification proceedings, such as settlor, trustee, beneficiary, decanting, and material mistake. Knowing these definitions clarifies roles and rights, the mechanics of filing a petition, and how courts determine whether a change should be permitted. Clear definitions also make it easier to gather evidence and explain requested changes to the court and other interested parties, reducing misunderstandings and improving the prospect of a smooth resolution.
The settlor is the person who established the trust and whose intent typically controls trust interpretation. The settlor’s wishes, expressed in the trust instrument and in valid contemporaneous documents, are central to courts considering modifications. When the settlor retains capacity, they generally may amend or revoke a revocable trust directly. When capacity is lacking or the settlor is deceased, a petition may be required to adjust the trust in ways that reflect what the settlor most likely intended. Demonstrating the settlor’s intent is often a focal point of modification proceedings.
A trustee is the individual or entity tasked with managing trust assets and carrying out the terms of the trust for beneficiaries’ benefit. Trustees have fiduciary duties such as loyalty, prudence, and impartiality and must act in the best interests of beneficiaries. In modification matters, trustees may petition the court or respond to petitions, provide accountings, and assist with the administrative steps necessary to implement court-approved changes. The trustee’s conduct and decision-making history can be scrutinized during proceedings where beneficiary interests are contested.
Beneficiaries are those who hold a present or future interest under the trust and have legal rights that courts protect during modification proceedings. Beneficiaries must be given proper notice of petitions and may object if they believe a proposed alteration will harm their interests. Courts carefully consider objections, weighing the settlor’s intent against any adverse effects on beneficiaries. Communication with beneficiaries and clear legal rationale for proposed changes can reduce disputes and foster voluntary agreements that avoid prolonged litigation.
Decanting refers to a process where a trustee transfers assets from one trust to another with different terms, where state law permits, to achieve modifications without court intervention. Decanting can be a useful alternative to petitions but is governed by statutory requirements and fiduciary standards. Other related concepts include judicial reformation for mistake, modification for tax purposes, and petitions to remove or replace trustees. Each option comes with procedural rules and practical considerations, so selecting the right approach depends on the trust’s terms and the specific objectives at hand.
When considering changes to a trust, there are several available routes, each with different legal and practical consequences. Direct amendment by the settlor is the simplest when capacity is present. Decanting or trustee-consent modifications may work when statutes and trust language allow. A petition to the probate court becomes necessary when capacity is lacking, language is ambiguous, or significant disputes exist. Each pathway involves different notice requirements, timelines, and evidentiary demands. Assessing the facts, trust provisions, and the likelihood of beneficiary objection helps determine the most effective strategy.
If the settlor retains mental capacity and the trust permits amendment or revocation, an in-person amendment can be the most efficient solution. This approach avoids court involvement and reduces costs, as the settlor signs a valid amendment following the trust’s requirements for execution. It remains important to ensure the amendment is properly drafted and witnessed according to California formalities. Clear documentation of the settlor’s intent and consistent recordkeeping can prevent future disputes and minimize the need for judicial oversight.
In certain circumstances a trustee may be able to modify the trust through decanting or by exercising discretionary powers authorized by the trust instrument and state law. This option can preserve privacy and lower legal costs while achieving necessary changes. However, trustees must adhere to fiduciary duties and statutory limits, giving notice where appropriate and documenting their reasons. Decanting is often used to correct practical administration issues or to adapt to tax law changes when the trust language and governing statute allow such flexibility.
If the settlor lacks capacity or has died, formal court relief may be necessary to modify a trust in ways that reflect the settlor’s intent or solve mistakes in original drafting. Courts review evidence related to intent, circumstances surrounding the trust’s creation, and any subsequent communications. A judicial petition provides finality and enforceability when private solutions are unavailable. Preparing a petition requires careful assembly of factual support, legal research, and procedural compliance to present persuasive grounds for the requested modification.
When beneficiaries disagree about proposed changes, unresolved disputes may necessitate formal court intervention to obtain a binding resolution. The court examines competing claims, assesses evidence, and weighs the settlor’s intent against the potential harm to beneficiaries. Litigation may involve discovery, hearings, and the presentation of testimony. Professional representation helps manage procedural complexities, advocate for a coherent legal theory, and work toward negotiated settlements where appropriate, reducing the risk of protracted litigation that could erode trust assets.
A court-approved modification can provide certainty and legal enforceability that informal steps cannot always guarantee, especially when capacity concerns or conflicting beneficiary interests exist. Judicial approval formalizes changes, secures court orders that protect trustees who implement modifications, and resolves disputes with finality. For families navigating complex circumstances, the formal process can bring clarity to contentious issues and reduce ambiguity about roles and obligations. While it may involve higher upfront costs, a comprehensive approach can prevent future litigation and preserve estate value over the long term.
Court involvement also offers procedural safeguards, such as notice requirements to affected parties and impartial judicial review, which help ensure that modifications align with the settlor’s intent. Judges evaluate evidence under established legal standards, making determinations that carry authoritative weight. In cases involving tax consequences or substantial assets, obtaining court approval can minimize future challenges and provide a defensible record. Working with counsel to present a clear, well-supported petition increases the likelihood of timely resolution and durable results for beneficiaries and fiduciaries.
One important benefit of a court-approved modification is that it protects trustees who implement ordered changes by providing judicial authorization. This reduces the risk of later claims that trustees breached duties by following the modification. Judicial orders clarify rights, responsibilities, and timelines for administration, limiting future litigation. For trustees and beneficiaries alike, this legal finality encourages smoother estate administration and gives parties confidence that the changes were properly vetted and sanctioned under applicable law.
Where trust language is ambiguous or contains drafting mistakes that affect distribution or administrative provisions, a judicial modification provides a mechanism to correct those errors in a way that aligns with the settlor’s likely intent. Courts can reform or clarify provisions based on evidence, preventing prolonged disputes among beneficiaries. This helps avoid unpredictable outcomes and ensures that the trust functions as intended, protecting assets and honoring the settlor’s wishes. Clear judicial rulings also serve as a solid foundation for future trust administration.
Keep contemporaneous records and communications that reflect the settlor’s intentions whenever changes are being considered. Written notes, signed amendments, emails, and records of conversations with advisors can all be valuable evidence for a petition. Medical records and capacity evaluations are also important when capacity may be questioned. Early documentation reduces uncertainty, shortens dispute timelines, and strengthens the factual basis for any requested modifications. Thoughtful recordkeeping can help prevent misunderstanding among beneficiaries and narrow the scope of contested issues prior to filing a petition.
Before initiating a court petition, carefully evaluate whether less formal routes are available, such as a settlor-signed amendment, trustee-led decanting, or mediated settlement among beneficiaries. These alternatives can save time and expense when they are legally available and practical. However, when the settlor lacks capacity, language is unclear, or significant conflicts exist, a judicial petition may be the only reliable way to secure enforceable change. Weighing benefits and risks, and seeking legal guidance early, helps determine the most appropriate path in each unique situation.
People seek trust modification petitions for many reasons, including correcting drafting errors, addressing unintended tax consequences, replacing an unavailable trustee, or resolving ambiguities that create administration problems. Life changes such as remarriage, births, deaths, or disability often prompt revisions to distribution plans. When the settlor cannot amend the trust directly or when beneficiaries contest proposed changes, the petition offers a courtroom process to achieve a binding resolution. Understanding the legal grounds and preparing strong documentary support increases the likelihood of a favorable judicial decision.
Other motivations include consolidating trusts through decanting where permitted, removing provisions that are impractical to administer, and ensuring that trusts comply with current law. The petition process clarifies responsibilities for trustees and beneficiaries, reducing future disputes. For families with complex assets or blended family arrangements, judicial approval can provide the stability needed for long-term administration. Planning ahead and consulting counsel early helps identify which changes can be handled informally and which will likely require court intervention.
Common circumstances include a settlor’s diminished capacity, conflicts among beneficiaries about distributions, trustee misconduct or incapacity, and unanticipated tax or financial consequences that the original trust did not address. Document errors or ambiguities in the trust wording also frequently warrant judicial clarification. In some cases, changing family dynamics such as new marriages or dependent needs justify requested modifications. Each circumstance calls for a tailored approach that balances legal standards with the practical realities of administering the trust.
When the settlor cannot themselves amend the trust due to incapacity or has passed away, petitioning the court may be the only available route to effect changes that reflect the settlor’s intentions under changed circumstances. Courts will carefully review the evidence to determine whether the proposed modification aligns with what the settlor likely intended, weighing declarations, prior planning documents, medical records, and witness testimony where appropriate. Proper evidence gathering and clear presentation are key to a successful petition in these sensitive contexts.
Trusts sometimes contain drafting ambiguities or mistakes that make administration difficult or unfair to beneficiaries. In such instances, a petition asking the court to reform or interpret the document can resolve uncertainties. The court examines surrounding circumstances and evidence of intent to determine the appropriate correction. Presenting a coherent narrative supported by documentation reduces the risk of protracted disputes and helps the court choose an interpretation that best honors the settlor’s aims while protecting beneficiary rights.
If a trustee is unable to perform duties, acts inconsistently with fiduciary obligations, or can no longer serve due to relocation or health issues, beneficiaries or interested parties may pursue court action to replace the trustee or approve a change in administration. Petitions addressing trustee removal often involve showing reasons for the change and proposing a qualified successor or new administrative plan. Courts focus on preserving continuity of asset management while safeguarding beneficiary interests and ensuring proper oversight of trust administration.
We provide assistance to Camp Meeker and nearby Sonoma County residents seeking changes to existing trust arrangements. Whether the matter involves clarifying ambiguous terms, correcting mistakes, or pursuing a judicial petition after the settlor’s incapacity or death, we offer pragmatic guidance from initial assessment through court resolution if necessary. Our team helps clients assemble documentation, explain options to beneficiaries, and present clear legal arguments that support requested modifications while aiming to minimize disruption and costs for all parties involved.
Our practice is built around client-focused planning and advocacy tailored to the needs of Bay Area and Sonoma County families. We combine careful legal analysis with practical strategies for resolving trust issues, whether through negotiated settlement, decanting where permitted, or a court petition. We emphasize clear communication, meticulous preparation of pleadings and supporting evidence, and thoughtful consideration of the family dynamics at play. The goal is to achieve enforceable solutions that protect estate assets and respect the settlor’s documented intentions.
We assist clients in assessing the legal framework that governs trust modifications under California law, identifying the most appropriate path for each situation, and preparing the required documentation and notices. Our approach includes evaluating alternatives to litigation, coordinating with medical or financial professionals for supporting documentation, and managing communications with beneficiaries to reduce conflict where possible. When court action is necessary, we present petitions in a manner that is both persuasive and efficient, with the aim of minimizing delays and costs.
From initial consultation through final court orders, we strive to provide practical guidance that helps clients make informed decisions. We prioritize responsiveness and a clear explanation of options, potential outcomes, and procedural timelines. By focusing on meticulous preparation and client priorities, we work to achieve results that preserve relationships and the value of trust assets. If court proceedings become necessary, we will advocate for outcomes that reflect the settlor’s wishes while protecting beneficiaries from unnecessary expense and uncertainty.
Our process begins with a detailed intake to understand the trust document, the settlor’s circumstances, and the objectives behind a proposed change. We review all relevant documents, identify parties entitled to notice, and recommend either informal alternatives or a petition if court relief is warranted. When filing is appropriate, we prepare pleadings, gather supporting evidence, and handle required service and notices. We keep clients informed at each stage and work to resolve disputes through negotiation when possible, while remaining prepared to present a compelling case at hearing.
The initial review focuses on the trust instrument, related estate planning documents, factual background, and the reasons for seeking modification. We assess whether the settlor can amend the trust directly, whether decanting is an option, or whether a petition is necessary. This stage includes identifying interested parties, estimating likely objections, and outlining a timeline and cost considerations. A clear strategy helps streamline evidence gathering, determine whether mediation may be useful, and prepare the case for court if a petition is the selected route.
Collecting thorough documentation is critical to supporting a petition. We help clients gather trust documents, prior versions, related estate planning paperwork such as wills and powers of attorney, and any medical or financial records relevant to capacity or intent. Witness statements, correspondence, and financial statements can also be important. Well-organized evidence strengthens the narrative presented to the court, reduces the chance of discovery disputes, and increases the likelihood of an efficient resolution that reflects the settlor’s wishes and the trust’s purpose.
Proper notice is required under California law to ensure that beneficiaries and other interested parties have an opportunity to respond to a trust modification petition. We prepare and serve notices in compliance with statutory requirements and provide clear explanations to recipients about the proposed changes and their rights. Early, transparent notice can reduce surprise and foster settlement. Where disputes are likely, timely notice also gives parties an opportunity to raise objections and engage in meaningful dialogue before a contested hearing becomes necessary.
Once the petition is prepared and notices served, the petition is filed with the probate court and served on interested parties. After filing, there is a period during which beneficiaries may file objections, request discovery, or seek alternative remedies. We respond to any objections with factual clarifications, legal briefing, and negotiation where appropriate. If disputes persist, the matter proceeds to hearings where evidence and testimony are presented. Maintaining a well-documented record is essential for presenting a persuasive case to the court.
If objections arise, discovery may be necessary to exchange relevant documents and obtain witness statements. Discovery efforts can include written requests, depositions, and subpoenas for medical or financial records when properly authorized. Coordinating discovery efficiently helps narrow disputed issues and identify areas for settlement. Thoughtful management of discovery reduces time and expense while preserving necessary evidence for any hearing. We guide clients through the discovery process, ensuring compliance with procedural rules and protecting privacy where possible.
Many trust disputes are resolved through mediation or negotiated settlement before a contested hearing. Mediation can preserve family relationships and reduce legal costs by facilitating compromises that meet the core interests of involved parties. When appropriate, we pursue settlement discussions with a focus on durable solutions that avoid future litigation. If mediation is unsuccessful, we prepare to present a complete case at hearing, ensuring that the court has the information and legal arguments needed to rule on the petition based on the evidence.
At hearing, the court evaluates the petition, objections, and submitted evidence to determine whether the requested modification is warranted. After the judge issues a decision, we assist with preparing the formal order and handling implementation tasks such as amending trust records, updating accountings, and communicating approved changes to relevant institutions. If the court denies the petition, we review options for appeal or alternative relief. Our goal is to ensure judicial orders are properly executed and the trust administration proceeds smoothly post-decision.
Once the court rules, an appropriately drafted order is essential for implementing modifications with clarity. The order should specify the exact changes, timelines, and any conditions the court imposes. We prepare the order, submit it for the judge’s signature, and then assist trustees and financial institutions in making required adjustments to accounts, beneficiary designations, and administrative processes. Clear documentation at this stage prevents confusion and supports ongoing compliance with the court’s directive.
After a successful petition, follow-up actions may include updating trust records, distributing assets per the revised terms, and filing any necessary accountings with the court. We help ensure that trustees comply with the new instructions and that beneficiaries receive clear explanations of how the modification affects their interests. If implementation raises new issues, we provide guidance to resolve them quickly, helping the trust transition smoothly to its updated administrative framework and reducing the likelihood of further disputes.
A trust modification petition is a formal request made to the probate court to change one or more provisions of an existing trust when private amendment is not feasible. Common reasons include questions about the settlor’s capacity, ambiguous or erroneous language in the trust instrument, or circumstances that require adjustments to carry out the trust’s intent. The petition outlines the changes sought, the legal basis for the request, and supporting evidence demonstrating why the modification aligns with the settlor’s intent or is necessary for effective administration. Courts weigh the settlor’s original intent against current facts, review supporting documentation, and consider objections from beneficiaries. The process includes notice to interested parties, potential discovery if disputes arise, and a hearing where evidence is presented. The court’s role is to ensure the proposed modification is appropriate under California law and results in a legally enforceable change that protects the rights of all parties involved.
Yes, a settlor who retains mental capacity generally has the authority to amend or revoke a revocable trust directly, following the trust’s formal amendment procedures. When capacity is present and the trust allows amendments, executing a properly drafted amendment can be the fastest and most private way to accomplish changes. Ensuring the amendment is witnessed and documented according to California requirements helps prevent later challenges based on formality or intent. When the settlor lacks capacity or is deceased, or the trust language or state law limits trustee powers, direct amendment may not be possible. In those cases, alternatives such as trustee-led decanting or a court petition may be necessary. Evaluating which option applies requires reviewing the trust document, the settlor’s condition, and the legal remedies available under governing statutes.
The court considers evidence that helps establish the settlor’s intent and the reasons why the proposed modification is appropriate. Relevant materials can include the original trust document and any prior drafts, written communications from the settlor, medical records relating to capacity, declarations from witnesses, and financial records demonstrating the practical need for change. Clear, contemporaneous documentation strengthens a petition by providing tangible proof of the reasons for modification. Courts also review objections and may order discovery to resolve factual disputes. Testimony, depositions, and expert medical opinions may be used to evaluate capacity or interpretation issues. Ultimately, the judge balances the probative weight of the evidence to determine whether the requested modification aligns with the trust’s purpose and legal standards.
The timeline for a trust modification petition varies with case complexity, the level of beneficiary dispute, and court scheduling. Simple, uncontested petitions can sometimes be resolved in a matter of months, while contested matters involving discovery, multiple hearings, or complex factual disputes may take considerably longer. Timing is influenced by the need to provide formal notice, the response period for beneficiaries, and available court calendar dates for hearings. Efficient preparation, early communication with interested parties, and focused evidence collection can help shorten the process. Where settlement is possible, mediated resolutions often reduce time and expense compared with fully contested litigation. Your legal representative can provide a case-specific estimate based on the trust’s complexity and local court practices.
Beneficiaries have the right to receive notice of a petition and to object if they believe the proposed modification is improper or harms their interests. When an objection is filed, it can trigger discovery, cause scheduling of contested hearings, and require additional evidence to address contested points. Courts give weight to beneficiary concerns while also examining the settlor’s intent and the legal justification for the requested change. If objections cannot be resolved through negotiation, the matter proceeds to hearing where the court will adjudicate competing claims based on the evidentiary record. Engaging in early, transparent communication and exploring settlement options can sometimes avoid contested hearings and produce outcomes that better preserve family relationships and estate value.
Alternatives to a court petition include direct amendment by a competent settlor, trustee decanting when authorized by statute and trust terms, and negotiated settlements among beneficiaries. These alternatives can preserve privacy, lower costs, and provide faster resolutions when they are legally available. Decanting permits a trustee to move assets to a new trust with different terms in certain circumstances, but statutory limits and fiduciary duties must be followed carefully. Mediation or collaborative negotiation can also resolve disagreements without judicial intervention. Assessing the viability of alternatives requires reviewing the trust document, the settlor’s condition, and the parties’ willingness to cooperate. Counsel can help evaluate options and choose the path most consistent with legal constraints and client goals.
Costs for a trust modification petition depend on factors such as filing fees, attorney time for drafting and court appearances, the scope of discovery, and whether the matter is contested. Uncontested petitions generally incur lower costs, while contested matters with discovery and hearings will increase expenses. Additional costs can arise from expert declarations, medical records, or mediator fees if alternative dispute resolution is pursued. Estimating costs early in the process helps clients make informed decisions about pursuing a petition versus seeking alternatives. We provide clear fee estimates and discuss cost-effective strategies, including targeted discovery and settlement efforts, to manage expenses while working toward a durable resolution.
Trustee removal may be pursued as part of a modification petition or in separate proceedings when a trustee has breached fiduciary duties, is incapacitated, or otherwise cannot fulfill responsibilities. Courts assess whether removal is necessary to protect beneficiaries’ interests, considering alternatives like surcharge or appointment of a successor trustee. Removing or replacing a trustee requires factual support and adherence to procedural requirements to protect the rights of all parties. When trustee removal is coupled with requested trust modifications, the court may address both issues in a single proceeding to provide comprehensive relief. Preparing thorough documentation and demonstrating how proposed changes improve administration or protect beneficiaries strengthens the case for judicial approval.
A court-approved modification can have tax implications depending on the nature of the change and the trust’s structure. For example, modifications that alter distribution timing or change beneficiary designations may affect estate, gift, or income tax considerations. Evaluating tax consequences before pursuing a petition helps avoid unintended liabilities and ensures that the modification supports the settlor’s overall financial goals. Collaborating with financial advisors or tax professionals as part of the planning process is often advisable. They can assess potential tax impacts and recommend structuring changes in ways that minimize adverse effects while aligning with the legal strategy for obtaining judicial approval.
Preparing before filing a petition involves gathering relevant documentation, identifying interested parties, and collecting evidence that supports the proposed modification. Important materials include the trust instrument and any related estate planning documents, medical records if capacity is at issue, correspondence that reflects the settlor’s intent, and financial records showing the need for administrative changes. Early organization makes the petition process smoother and more persuasive to the court. It is also helpful to communicate early with beneficiaries where appropriate to explore potential settlement options. Consulting counsel for an initial assessment can clarify alternatives to litigation, legal risks, and likely timelines, enabling a more informed decision about whether to proceed with a court petition.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas