If changes in family circumstances, tax law, or asset composition make an existing trust unsuitable, a trust modification petition can provide a path to update the document while protecting beneficiaries’ interests. A trust modification petition requests judicial approval to alter, add, or remove terms of a trust when the settlor is deceased or incapacitated or when the trust language or circumstances prevent nonjudicial changes. This process involves careful review of the trust instrument, assessment of beneficiary rights, and preparation of persuasive legal filings that align with California trust law and local court procedures in Sonoma County.
Many clients turn to a trust modification petition when they need to address outdated provisions, correct drafting errors, reconcile contradictions, or reflect new family situations such as marriage, divorce, births, deaths, or the addition of assets like real property or retirement accounts. A petition may also be appropriate when a trustee’s powers need adjustment, when administrative provisions cause unintended tax consequences, or when beneficiary incapacity requires different distribution terms. The goal is to secure a binding court order that clarifies or amends the trust in a way that is fair, legally sound, and durable for future administration.
A trust modification petition can prevent confusion, litigation, or unintended results that arise from ambiguous or outdated trust provisions. Court-approved modifications create clear, enforceable directions for trustees and beneficiaries, reducing the chance of disputes later. Modifications can improve tax outcomes, preserve family harmony by addressing changed relationships, and enable the trustee to manage assets more effectively. Pursuing a petition ensures that changes are documented through the judicial process, providing finality for financial institutions and probate courts while protecting the integrity of the trust document for future administration.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman in San Jose assist clients across California with estate planning and trust matters, including trust modification petitions. The firm takes a practical, client-focused approach, starting with a careful review of the trust document and the circumstances motivating change. We evaluate all legal options, prepare court filings when necessary, and work to keep the process as cost-effective and predictable as possible. Our goal is to help clients reach modifications that protect beneficiaries and make administration clear, whether negotiations with interested parties are possible or court intervention becomes necessary.
A trust modification petition is a legal request to the court to alter the terms of a trust based on changed circumstances, clerical errors, ambiguous provisions, or the settlor’s inability to consent. California law provides mechanisms for both nonjudicial modifications when all interested parties agree and judicial petitions when consent cannot be obtained or when the change affects third-party rights. The petition must articulate the reasons for modification, show how the proposed change aligns with the settlor’s intent or equitable principles, and include notice to beneficiaries and other interested parties to ensure due process.
The process typically begins with a detailed analysis of the trust instrument and supporting documents, followed by attempts to resolve issues with beneficiaries and trustees through mediation or negotiation where feasible. If negotiations fail or are impractical, a formal petition is filed with the appropriate Sonoma County court and served on interested parties. The court will consider the settlor’s intent, the impact on beneficiaries, and statutory requirements before granting relief. Preparing a clear petition and evidentiary record is essential to achieving a favorable outcome and minimizing delays.
A trust modification petition is a request to a court to change trust terms when the trust cannot be modified without judicial intervention, such as when beneficiaries disagree or when the settlor cannot provide consent. Reasons for petitioning include correcting mistakes, resolving ambiguities, addressing unforeseen circumstances, or adapting to new tax or legal realities. The petition sets out the factual background, the requested changes, and legal grounds. The court evaluates whether the modification serves the trust’s overall purpose and whether it respects the settlor’s probable intent while safeguarding beneficiary interests.
Successful petitions include a clear statement of the trust’s original terms, a detailed explanation of why modification is necessary, proposed revised language, and supporting evidence such as declarations or documentary proof. Parties must provide notice to beneficiaries and allow an opportunity to object. The court may hold a hearing to evaluate evidence and argument. Sometimes settlement negotiations run in parallel. Proper procedural compliance, accurate service, and persuasive legal reasoning increase the likelihood of court approval and reduce the risk of protracted litigation or appeals.
Understanding common terms helps clients follow the modification process and communicate effectively with counsel and the court. Terms often encountered include settlor, trustee, beneficiary, conservator, decanting, cy pres, pour-over will, and Heggstad petition. Clear definitions reduce confusion when preparing or responding to a petition. A well-informed client can better assess options, participate in settlement discussions, and make decisions about proposed revisions. Familiarity with local court practices in Sonoma County also aids in setting timelines and expectations for how a petition will proceed.
The settlor is the person who established the trust and defined its terms, distributions, and administrative rules. The settlor’s intent is central to most modification petitions; courts strive to honor what the settlor, when acting freely, would have wanted. When the settlor is alive but incapacitated, or when the settlor is deceased, modification requests must show how the change aligns with that intent or addresses circumstances the settlor could not foresee. Documentation such as trust formation papers, letters of intent, or related estate documents may help demonstrate original intent.
Trustee powers refer to the authorities granted by the trust document that allow the trustee to manage assets, make distributions, invest funds, and act on behalf of beneficiaries. Petitions sometimes seek to expand or limit these powers where original language proves inadequate or where changes in assets or law require different managerial authority. Courts review whether proposed adjustments are consistent with the trust’s purpose and whether they protect the interests of beneficiaries. Clear delineation of trustee powers can reduce disputes and improve trust administration efficiency.
Beneficiary rights include the entitlement to receive distributions under the trust terms, to be informed about trust administration, and to challenge actions by the trustee or proposed modifications that adversely affect their interests. Courts ensure that beneficiaries receive proper notice of modification petitions and an opportunity to object or request further information. Protecting beneficiary rights is a core consideration in petition proceedings, and proposed changes must be weighed against any potential harm or impairment of those rights.
A Heggstad petition is a specific California procedure used to establish that certain assets should be treated as though they were transferred to a trust even if the transfer was not properly completed before the settlor’s death. This petition can help avoid probate by confirming that assets belong to the trust. While distinct from ordinary trust modification petitions, a Heggstad petition may be encountered when trust administration reveals title or funding issues requiring judicial clarification to preserve the settlor’s estate plan and beneficiary expectations.
When possible, resolving trust issues outside of court can save time and expense, but this requires agreement among all interested parties and a clear legal basis for nonjudicial amendment. A trust modification petition becomes necessary when parties cannot reach consensus, when the trust restricts nonjudicial changes, or when third-party rights are implicated. The petition route provides judicial authority and finality but involves formal filing, notice, and potential hearings. Deciding which path to pursue depends on the trust’s language, the nature and extent of the proposed change, and the positions of beneficiaries and trustees.
A limited, nonjudicial approach can work when all beneficiaries and the trustee agree to a narrowly defined adjustment that does not affect third-party rights. In these situations, written consents, amendments executed in accordance with the trust’s amendment clause, and clear documentation can achieve the desired result without court involvement. This route is typically more expedient and less expensive, and it preserves privacy. However, the change must be implemented precisely and recorded correctly to prevent future disputes or challenges to its validity.
Sometimes modifications are needed primarily to streamline administration, such as clarifying trustee duties, adjusting notice requirements, or correcting typographical errors. When these adjustments do not alter substantive beneficiary rights or create contested outcomes, parties can often use nonjudicial amendments coupled with updated trust records. This avoids formal court proceedings while improving the trust’s clarity and usability for trustees, institutions, and family members who will rely on the document during administration.
When beneficiaries disagree about a proposed change or when a trustee’s actions are contested, court involvement may be necessary to resolve disputes and produce a binding decision. A judicial petition provides a neutral forum where evidence and legal argument can be evaluated, allowing the court to balance interests and craft an order that protects the trust’s core purpose. Legal counsel can prepare filings, coordinate service and notice, and present the factual record so the court has the information needed to make an informed decision.
Complex situations such as improperly funded trust assets, title discrepancies, or the involvement of creditors, government benefits, or other outside parties often require judicial clarification to ensure changes are effective and enforceable. A petition can secure a court order that instructs third parties and financial institutions, reduces the risk of future litigation, and provides legal certainty. Building a robust evidentiary record and navigating procedural requirements are essential to securing the comprehensive relief needed in these circumstances.
A comprehensive, court-approved modification can deliver legal finality and clarity that informal changes may lack. Court orders are widely recognized by financial institutions, title companies, and other entities, which reduces friction in trust administration and asset transfers. Judicial oversight can address conflicts among beneficiaries, clarify ambiguities, and tailor remedies to protect vulnerable beneficiaries or preserve tax benefits. While litigation involves costs and time, the benefits of a decisive, enforceable resolution often outweigh those considerations for particularly complex or contested situations.
Comprehensive petitions also help document the factual record and rationales for changes, creating a transparent administrative history that future trustees and beneficiaries can rely upon. This reduces the prospect of future disputes and supports consistent administration across changing circumstances. In matters involving public benefits, special needs trusts, or family members with limitations, court-ordered modifications can ensure that adjustments are made in a legally sustainable way, protecting both assets and entitlement eligibility where applicable.
A court order resolving trust terms offers a degree of finality that private agreements may lack, making it easier to interface with banks, title companies, and retirement plan administrators. When those institutions recognize the court’s direction, trustees can act with confidence to distribute assets, transfer titles, and close accounts. This reduces delays and administrative headaches. The clarity provided by judicial authorization also helps prevent future challenges by providing a public, enforceable record of the modification and the court’s reasoning.
Court-approved modifications can be tailored to protect beneficiaries who rely on public benefits, require ongoing care, or have specific financial needs. Properly structured amendments can preserve eligibility for government programs while ensuring that the trust fulfills its distribution objectives. The judicial process allows interested parties to raise concerns so the court can craft orders that address those issues. This judicial scrutiny helps ensure that modifications are fair and sustainable over time, reducing the risk of future disputes or inadvertent harm to vulnerable beneficiaries.
Start by assembling the original trust document, any amendments, related wills like a pour-over will, beneficiary designations, deeds, and account statements. Complete documentation helps identify whether the trust was properly funded and reveals ambiguities or drafting errors that may justify a petition. Having a clear, chronological set of documents improves the quality of your petition and supports factual assertions in declarations. This preparation also helps in settlement discussions with beneficiaries and can reveal alternative, less formal routes to achieve the desired outcome.
Provide concise, well-organized declarations and exhibits that document the circumstances warranting modification. Declarations may include testimony from trustees, beneficiaries, or professionals who can confirm facts such as funding problems, clerical mistakes, or changed circumstances. Attach supporting documents like deeds, account statements, and correspondence. A clear evidentiary record helps the court evaluate the request efficiently and can shorten hearings or reduce contested litigation by making the factual basis for modification unmistakable.
Clients pursue trust modification petitions for many reasons, including to address drafting errors, clarify ambiguous instructions, correct beneficiaries’ designations, adapt to new family circumstances, or respond to tax law changes that affect trust distributions. Other reasons include resolving trustee authority issues, protecting a beneficiary who requires special arrangements, or addressing title and funding problems that prevent proper administration. When these issues cannot be resolved through direct amendment or consensus among interested parties, a judicial petition provides a path forward that results in a binding court order.
A petition may also be necessary when the trust contains terms that create unintended consequences or conflict with other estate planning documents like pour-over wills or retirement plan beneficiaries. In some cases, settling disputes through a court petition can be less disruptive in the long run by producing a clear legal framework for administration. Clients in Fetters Hot Springs-Agua Caliente and Sonoma County frequently seek counsel to evaluate whether a nonjudicial amendment is possible or whether a petition is the most reliable way to achieve lasting clarity and protection.
Common circumstances include the settlor’s death leaving unfunded assets, conflicting beneficiary designations, trustee incapacity or misconduct, changes in family structure such as divorce or remarriage, or a need to preserve beneficiary eligibility for public benefits. Clerical mistakes in the trust, ambiguities about distribution conditions, and the discovery of assets not addressed by the original instrument also prompt petitions. Each scenario requires careful analysis of the trust language and applicable law to determine the best approach for achieving a fair and enforceable resolution.
When assets intended to be held in trust remain titled in the settlor’s name or otherwise were not successfully transferred, a petition can help clarify ownership and direct distribution under the trust terms. This situation can create steps that complicate administration and create potential for probate. A petition may request judicial recognition that certain assets are effectively trust property or provide instructions for transferring titles and accounts. Clear documentation and legal argumentation help courts determine the intent and appropriate remedy.
Conflicts can arise when beneficiary designations on retirement accounts, life insurance policies, or other instruments conflict with trust provisions. Resolving these conflicts may require court intervention to reconcile the settlor’s intent or to determine which document controls distribution. A petition can seek orders that harmonize the trust with outside designations or that establish the trust’s priority in accordance with evidence of the settlor’s plan. Courts consider the totality of documentary and testimonial evidence when resolving such disputes.
Sometimes language meant to provide flexibility or protection produces outcomes the settlor did not foresee, such as ambiguous distribution triggers or trustee powers that are too broad or too narrow. When administration under such provisions would produce unfair or impractical results, a petition can ask the court to interpret the terms or to modify the provisions to better reflect the settlor’s overall intent. The court evaluates evidence and the trust’s purpose to decide whether and how to adjust the document for appropriate administration.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provides legal services to clients in Fetters Hot Springs-Agua Caliente and the surrounding Sonoma County communities regarding trust problems that require judicial clarification or modification. We assist with preparing petitions, coordinating notice to beneficiaries, and representing clients in hearings when needed. We work to explain complex legal concepts in plain language, lay out realistic timelines and costs, and pursue solutions that protect your family’s long-term interests while complying with California trust and probate law.
Clients benefit from a clear process that begins with a careful document review and a strategy meeting to assess options, risks, and likely outcomes. We focus on resolving issues efficiently, exploring nonjudicial agreements when possible and preparing strong court filings when necessary. Our approach emphasizes open communication and realistic expectations about timelines and potential costs, helping clients make informed decisions about whether to pursue negotiation, mediation, or a judicial petition based on the specifics of their case.
We prioritize protecting beneficiary rights and minimizing disruption during trust administration. That includes preparing thorough declarations and exhibits, ensuring proper service and notice, and advising on settlement opportunities that preserve family relationships and reduce expense. When court action is required, we aim for procedural accuracy and persuasive presentation so the court can efficiently evaluate the petition. Our practice serves clients throughout Sonoma County including Fetters Hot Springs-Agua Caliente and nearby communities with responsive, practical legal support.
Whether the issue involves funding errors, conflicting documents, or contested trustee conduct, we work to identify the most effective path to resolution. We explain legal standards and potential remedies in straightforward language and help clients weigh the benefits of nonjudicial fixes versus court petitions. Our process includes clear engagement terms, regular updates, and preparation for possible hearings. The objective is to secure outcomes that align with the settlor’s plan and that facilitate smooth trust administration going forward.
Our process begins with a thorough intake and document review to identify the trust language at issue, the positions of interested parties, and any funding or title complications. We then recommend a strategy, pursuing negotiation and mediation where appropriate or preparing a judicial petition if necessary. We prepare the necessary pleadings, coordinate service and notice to beneficiaries, and build an evidentiary record. Throughout, we keep clients informed about anticipated timelines, potential court appearances, and practical steps to protect assets and beneficiary rights during the proceeding.
The first step is assembling and analyzing all relevant documents to understand the trust’s terms, amendments, related estate planning papers, and any assets that may be unfunded or mis-titled. We identify possible legal grounds for modification, whether through nonjudicial amendment or a petition to the court. This review clarifies whether beneficiary consent could permit a private amendment or whether conflicting interests necessitate judicial relief. Accurate assessment helps avoid unnecessary filing and targets efforts efficiently.
Gathering the trust instrument, amendments, deeds, account statements, beneficiary designations, and related wills is critical to building a clear factual record. These documents reveal whether the trust was properly funded, identify potential conflicts, and show any drafting errors or ambiguities. Clear organization of exhibits and contemporaneous records improves the credibility of declarations and streamlines the drafting of petitions and legal arguments, which can help shorten hearings and reduce costs associated with discovery or extensive factual disputes.
We evaluate who must be notified, who can object, and which parties might support or oppose a proposed modification. Understanding the dynamics among trustees, beneficiaries, and creditors helps determine whether negotiation, mediation, or immediate court filing is the best approach. This analysis looks at any potential public benefits implications, tax consequences, and the roles of institutions that hold assets. The goal is an efficient plan that protects rights while minimizing uncertainty for all involved.
If negotiation is possible, we initiate settlement discussions to see whether a nonjudicial amendment or agreed modification can be achieved. If agreement cannot be reached or if the trust precludes private amendment, we prepare a formal petition for the Sonoma County court. Petition preparation includes drafting the proposed amended language, preparing declarations and exhibits, and ensuring compliance with local court rules and notice requirements. Thorough preparation improves the likelihood of a clear, enforceable order if the court approves the modification.
Preparing a petition involves drafting precise proposed language for the trust amendment, assembling supporting evidence, and crafting declarations that explain the factual background and legal justifications. Well-drafted proposed language helps the court understand the precise relief sought and reduces ambiguity about implementation. Exhibits such as deeds, account statements, correspondence, and prior trust documents should be organized to support assertions about intent, funding, or errors that justify the requested modification.
Proper service and notice to all interested parties is a foundational requirement for petitions. We ensure that notices comply with statutory requirements and local rules, providing beneficiaries and other parties an opportunity to respond. Procedural compliance also includes filing appropriate cover sheets, proposed orders, and meeting any local court formatting or timing requirements. Attention to these details reduces procedural challenges and keeps the case progressing toward a hearing and final order.
If a hearing is scheduled, we present the factual record and legal arguments supporting the modification, respond to objections, and propose an order that specifies the revised trust language and administrative steps. After the court issues an order, we assist with implementation tasks such as notification to financial institutions, retitling assets, and updating trust records. Ensuring institutions accept the court order and complete required transfers helps finalize the modification and facilitates smooth trust administration going forward.
At hearing, clear presentation of declarations, exhibits, and legal argument helps the judge understand why the modification is appropriate. We emphasize the settlor’s probable intent, the benefits of the proposed change, and safeguards for beneficiary interests. Addressing procedural or evidentiary objections proactively can streamline the hearing. The court’s decision will hinge on the facts presented and whether the proposed amendment aligns with the trust’s purpose and applicable law, so preparation is essential to an effective hearing strategy.
After obtaining a court order, trustees and beneficiaries must implement any required transfers, account retitling, or distribution adjustments. We help coordinate with banks, title companies, and retirement plan administrators to ensure the order is accepted and followed. Updating trust files with the final order and amended trust documents provides a complete administrative record for future trustees and beneficiaries. This implementation phase completes the process by making the court-approved changes operative and clear to all parties involved.
A trust modification petition is a formal request filed with the court asking for an order to change the terms of a trust when nonjudicial options are unavailable or contentious. It is necessary when beneficiaries disagree about proposed changes, when the trust’s amendment clause does not permit the intended modification, when the settlor cannot consent, or when funding or title issues prevent straightforward administration. The petition explains the reasons for modification, proposes specific changes, and provides supporting evidence demonstrating why the change serves the trust’s purpose. The court evaluates the settlor’s probable intent, the effect on beneficiaries, and legal standards before deciding whether to grant the requested relief. Proper notice to interested parties and a clear evidentiary record are essential to the petition’s success. In many cases, attempts at negotiation or mediation precede filing, but when those efforts fail or are impractical, a petition provides a binding resolution that clarifies the trust for future administration.
Yes, a trust can sometimes be changed without court involvement when the trust document explicitly permits nonjudicial amendments or all interested parties agree in writing to a modification. Such nonjudicial changes are often faster and more private than court petitions. However, all parties with an interest in the trust must consent and any amendment must comply with the trust’s formal amendment requirements. Clear documentation of the agreement and properly executed amendments are necessary to reduce the likelihood of later disputes or challenges. Nonjudicial approaches are not appropriate in every case. When there are substantial disagreements, potential impacts on third parties, or statutory limitations that prevent private amendment, a court petition may be the more reliable route. Assessing whether a nonjudicial resolution is feasible requires careful review of the trust documents and the positions of trustees and beneficiaries.
Beneficiary objections play a significant role because the court must ensure that modifications do not unfairly harm beneficiary rights. When objections arise, the court will consider the nature and strength of those objections, the settlor’s intent, and whether the proposed changes are consistent with the trust’s purpose. Objections can result in contested hearings where evidence and testimony are evaluated. The court may limit or tailor relief to protect legitimately impacted beneficiaries while allowing other amendments that do not cause harm. Engaging in early communication and mediation can sometimes resolve objections without a contested hearing. Where objections persist, presenting a strong factual record and articulating how the modification preserves the trust’s essential goals increases the likelihood of a favorable judicial decision. Proper notice and an opportunity for affected parties to be heard are legal prerequisites for the court to consider a petition.
Supportive evidence for a petition typically includes the trust instrument and any amendments, deeds, account statements, beneficiary designation forms, and correspondence that shed light on the settlor’s intent and the circumstances prompting change. Declarations from trustees, beneficiaries, or professionals who can attest to facts such as funding errors, clerical mistakes, or changed circumstances are also important. Documentary evidence that shows how the trust was intended to operate or how the error occurred strengthens the petition and helps the court assess the requested relief. A clear, well-organized evidentiary record helps the court evaluate whether the modification aligns with the settlor’s goals and whether it protects beneficiary interests. Exhibits should be assembled to support factual claims and reduce uncertainty, and legal argument should connect the facts to applicable statutory or case law that permits the requested modification.
The timeline for a trust modification petition varies depending on complexity, the level of contest, and court availability. Straightforward petitions with cooperative parties and clear documentary support may proceed relatively quickly, while contested matters requiring multiple hearings, discovery, or detailed factual evidence can take months or longer to resolve. Local court calendars in Sonoma County and the need for service and response periods also affect timing. Preparing a complete petition and addressing procedural requirements promptly can reduce avoidable delays. Clients should plan for a timeline that accommodates notice periods and potential scheduling needs for hearings. Early attempts at negotiation or mediation can sometimes shorten the process by narrowing contested issues. During preparation, clear communication about anticipated milestones helps set realistic expectations for when a final order may be entered and implemented.
A court-ordered modification can be structured to protect a beneficiary’s eligibility for public benefits when that concern is present. For example, changes can direct that assets be distributed in a way that preserves Medicaid or other means-tested benefits by creating appropriate trust arrangements or distribution limitations. The court can consider public benefits implications when fashioning relief, and careful drafting can help preserve benefits while still achieving the trust’s aims. Addressing public benefits concerns often requires coordination with professionals who understand government benefit rules. Early identification of potential impacts allows the proposed modification to include safeguards that reduce the risk of disqualifying a beneficiary or creating unintended financial hardship. Courts weigh these considerations to ensure any modification is fair and workable for those who rely on benefits.
A trustee can petition the court to modify a trust when circumstances make it necessary for proper administration or when the trustee needs clarification of authority. Trustees have a duty to act in the best interests of beneficiaries, and when trust language is unclear or conflicts with practical administration, a trustee may seek judicial guidance or modification. The court will assess whether the proposed change is consistent with the settlor’s intent and whether it is necessary for effective administration or protection of beneficiaries’ interests. When trustees initiate petitions, courts expect well-documented reasons and evidence supporting the requested relief. Trustees should follow procedural rules for notice and disclosure so beneficiaries have an opportunity to respond. Courts generally favor solutions that preserve the trust’s purpose while enabling trustees to fulfill their fiduciary responsibilities responsibly.
A Heggstad petition and a standard trust modification petition serve different purposes. A Heggstad petition seeks a judicial declaration that certain assets should be treated as trust property because the settlor intended them to be part of the trust even though the formal transfer was not completed. This helps avoid probate for those assets by confirming their inclusion in the trust. In contrast, a modification petition seeks to change the trust’s terms themselves, such as distributions or trustee powers, rather than to confirm asset ownership. Both procedures may arise during trust administration and can be related when funding issues intersect with requests to alter trust terms. The choice between them depends on whether the core problem is improper funding or ambiguous or problematic trust language that requires clarification or amendment by the court.
Alternatives to filing a petition include pursuing a nonjudicial amendment if the trust’s terms allow for it and all interested parties consent in writing. Mediation or facilitated negotiation can also resolve disputes and produce agreed amendments without court involvement. These alternatives are often less costly and preserve privacy compared with court proceedings. Properly executed written consents and amendments can accomplish many objectives when parties are willing to cooperate and when no third-party rights are implicated. When parties cannot agree or when the trust prevents private amendment, a petition provides authoritative resolution. Evaluating alternatives requires careful review of the trust documents and the parties’ positions. Early communication and attempts at settlement can reduce the need for formal litigation and help craft outcomes that are acceptable to the majority of interested parties.
Costs for pursuing a trust modification petition vary by case complexity, the extent of contested issues, attorney involvement, and court-related fees. Simple matters resolved through agreement are generally less expensive, while contested petitions that require substantial evidence, hearings, or discovery involve higher costs. Clients should expect to budget for attorney time, filing fees, process service, and possible costs for obtaining records or expert assistance if needed. Clear fee agreements and periodic updates on expenses help clients manage financial expectations. We discuss likely cost ranges during initial consultations and recommend strategies to control expenses, such as narrowing contested issues, pursuing early mediation, and preparing focused evidentiary records. Transparent billing practices and cost-benefit discussions help clients make informed decisions about whether to pursue negotiation, petitioning, or alternative dispute resolution.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas