A Heggstad petition can be an essential legal remedy when property that was intended to become part of a living trust did not get properly transferred before a person’s passing. At the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman, we represent clients throughout Guerneville and Sonoma County who face gaps between estate planning documents and actual asset ownership. This introduction explains what a Heggstad petition seeks to accomplish, how the process begins in probate court, and why addressing these issues promptly helps preserve family intentions and reduce long-term dispute risks among beneficiaries and surviving family members.
Many families discover after a death that an asset was never retitled into a trust or that a deed or account transfer failed to complete, leaving the asset outside the trust and subject to probate. A Heggstad petition asks the court to find that the decedent intended the asset to belong to the trust, correcting the record to carry out those intentions. This paragraph summarizes when families should consider this action, what evidence tends to support a petition, and how the local court in Sonoma County typically handles these petitions to effectuate the decedent’s estate planning goals.
Filing a Heggstad petition can avoid the expense and delay of full probate by clarifying that property was meant to be held in trust, allowing trustees to manage and distribute assets according to the trust document. This pathway supports family stability by reducing contested claims and helping trustees act with authority. The petition process also creates a public record that aligns title and ownership with testamentary intent, which simplifies actions like selling real property or distributing funds. Engaging counsel promptly can help gather the necessary documentation such as deeds, trust language, and communications that demonstrate the decedent’s intended transfer into the trust.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provides estate planning and trust administration services for individuals and families across California, including Guerneville and surrounding Sonoma County communities. Our approach is practical and client-centered, focusing on clear communication and careful document review to determine the best path for resolving title or trust issues. We assist in gathering documentary evidence, preparing and filing petitions, and representing clients in court as necessary. Our office emphasizes respectful, prompt handling of sensitive family matters to achieve outcomes that reflect the decedent’s wishes while minimizing conflict and delay.
A Heggstad petition is a specialized request to the probate court asking it to recognize that property should be treated as trust property despite being titled differently or omitted from trust schedules. The petition typically requires showing that the decedent intended to transfer the asset into the trust, backed by evidence such as trust documents, drafts, deeds, correspondence, beneficiary designations, and witness statements. Understanding the procedural steps and the kinds of proof that support a petition helps families prepare thoughtfully and increases the likelihood the court will grant the requested relief, thereby allowing trustees to administer the asset consistent with the trust.
Navigating a Heggstad petition involves careful case preparation, including investigating the chain of title, reviewing the trust instrument, and assembling contemporaneous evidence of intent. The court evaluates whether the decedent intended to create or fund the trust and whether equitable remedies are appropriate when formal transfer steps were not completed. Our role is to help clients collect the necessary documentation, craft persuasive legal arguments, and liaise with the court and other parties. Early attention to these matters can reduce the chance of disputes and support a smoother transfer of assets to the trust’s control for distribution according to the trust’s terms.
A Heggstad petition asks the probate court to find that property, though not formally transferred, was intended by the decedent to be held in trust at the time of death. The court then orders records and title adjustments to reflect that intent, enabling trustees to act with authority over the asset. This remedy is particularly useful when a deed, account change, or beneficiary designation failed to take effect before death, leaving property outside the trust. The petition relies on evidence of intent and surrounding circumstances to align official title with the estate plan and reduce the need for a lengthy probate process.
Successful petitions typically present clear documentary proof of intent, such as the trust document, draft deeds, signed declarations, or communications indicating the decedent’s plan. The process includes preparing the petition, providing notice to interested parties, submitting evidence, and, if necessary, attending court hearings. Evidence may include affidavits from the person who prepared documents, trustees, family members, and professionals who observed the decedent’s plans. The court weighs these materials to determine whether the decedent intended to transfer the asset into the trust and whether a judicial determination is warranted to honor that intention.
Understanding common terms like trust, trustee, grantor, title, deed, probate, and beneficiary will help you follow the Heggstad petition process. This description clarifies vocabulary used by courts and estate professionals so clients can better evaluate documents and discussions. We outline how each term relates to funding a trust and to the legal remedies available when funding is incomplete. Familiarity with these concepts makes it easier to identify the evidence that supports a petition and to communicate effectively with your attorney, financial institutions, and family members during the resolution process.
A trust is a legal arrangement under which one person or entity holds title to property for the benefit of one or more beneficiaries under the terms established by the grantor. In estate planning, revocable living trusts are commonly used to manage assets during lifetime and to transfer property without probate at death. Understanding what a trust does and how assets are funded into it is central when evaluating whether a Heggstad petition is necessary to align title with the grantor’s intent and ensure assets are distributed according to the trust terms.
A deed is a legal document that transfers ownership or title in real property from one person to another. When a deed does not properly reflect transfer into a trust, real property might remain titled in the decedent’s name rather than the trust, potentially requiring a Heggstad petition to confirm the decedent’s intent to fund the trust. Examining deeds, recording dates, and any notations or drafts can provide crucial evidence showing that the transfer was intended even though formal recording may have been incomplete at the time of death.
Title refers to the legal ownership of an asset, such as real property or an account. Title determines who has authority to sell, manage, or transfer the asset. When title does not match the intended beneficiary or trust, it may be necessary to initiate a legal process like a Heggstad petition to correct the record. The petition asks the court to declare that title should be treated as trust property based on the decedent’s demonstrated intent and supporting documentary evidence.
Probate is the court-supervised process for settling a decedent’s estate, distributing assets, and paying debts when property is titled solely in the decedent’s name. A Heggstad petition can be a strategic tool to avoid subjecting trust assets to probate by establishing that property should be considered trust-owned. When successful, such a petition allows trustees to administer and distribute the property under the trust’s terms rather than through probate, which can be more time-consuming and costly for families.
When an asset intended for a trust remains improperly titled, families can consider various remedies including direct transfer through probate, quiet title actions, or a Heggstad petition to the probate court. Each option differs in timing, cost, formality, and evidence standards. A Heggstad petition often offers a balanced approach by focusing on the decedent’s intent and seeking a judicial declaration that avoids full probate administration. Evaluating the specific facts, the type of asset, and the interests of affected parties helps determine the most practical path to align ownership with the estate plan.
A limited approach may be appropriate when the affected asset is modest in value or when the title issue is straightforward and uncontested. In such situations, parties may resolve the matter through a simple judicial declaration or by obtaining clear documentation from financial institutions and recording corrected deeds without a protracted court battle. This approach reduces legal fees and time in court while preserving family relationships. However, even when the matter seems simple, careful documentation and legal oversight help ensure the chosen method will be accepted by third parties and recording authorities.
When all interested parties are in agreement about the decedent’s intentions, a limited approach may resolve the issue more quickly. Joint agreements, notarized statements, or signed affidavits showing mutual understanding can be persuasive to courts and title companies, enabling administrative corrections without prolonged litigation. Even with consensus, formal filings and proper recording practices are important to prevent future disputes. Legal oversight helps ensure that agreements are appropriately documented, compliant with local rules, and sufficient to restore title or transfer property into the trust.
A comprehensive legal approach is warranted when there are conflicting claims to property, ambiguous documentation, or competing beneficiaries who do not agree on the decedent’s intent. In such cases, court proceedings that include discovery, evidence collection, and litigation strategies may be necessary to resolve disputes and secure clear title. A thorough legal process provides the structure to examine witness credibility, authenticate documents, and present the strongest possible case to the probate court so that the outcome aligns with the trust’s terms and the decedent’s expressed wishes.
For significant assets such as real estate with substantial value or accounts with material balances, taking a comprehensive legal approach protects the interests of beneficiaries and preserves asset value. Complex ownership structures, liens, or competing creditor claims may require careful legal navigation to avoid unintended losses. A full legal pathway includes preparing thorough evidentiary records, coordinating with title professionals, and presenting a persuasive petition to the court that seeks a definitive resolution to prevent repeated disputes or future challenges to the transfer of these important assets.
A comprehensive process reduces uncertainty by creating a clear judicial finding that property should be treated as trust-owned, which all parties and third parties can rely upon. This reduces the likelihood of future litigation and provides trustees with the authority to manage, sell, or distribute assets according to the trust terms. The procedure also helps protect beneficiary interests and can facilitate smoother transactions with title companies, banks, and other institutions that require formal documentation before transferring or releasing assets to the trust.
By investing in a thorough legal resolution, families can avoid fragmented outcomes where different institutions take inconsistent positions about ownership. A court order resolving ownership questions creates a single authoritative record that supports subsequent estate administration steps. Additionally, a complete approach allows the team handling the matter to address ancillary issues such as creditor notices, tax consequences, and concurrent petitions that may affect the trust’s administration, resulting in a durable resolution that aligns the property with the grantor’s wishes and the trust’s distribution plan.
Obtaining a court declaration that property is trust-owned provides trustees with clear authority to take action, including selling real property or distributing funds to beneficiaries. This eliminates confusion over who holds legal title and helps ensure third parties cooperate with the trustee’s requests. With an authoritative record in place, contingencies such as bank holds, title insurance issues, or buyer concerns are more readily resolved, facilitating the efficient settlement of the decedent’s affairs and the timely transfer of assets in accordance with the trust instrument.
Securing a judicial determination that aligns ownership with the trust lowers the chance that dissatisfied heirs or creditors will challenge distributions later. A comprehensive petition process creates a public record and court orders that are difficult to overturn, which provides long-term protection for the trustee and beneficiaries. This stability helps families move forward with confidence, knowing that the decedent’s intentions have been formally recognized and that the assets will be administered according to the trust, minimizing the emotional and financial toll of protracted legal conflicts.
Start by collecting all relevant documents such as deeds, trust agreements, draft documents, beneficiary designations, and any communications that indicate the decedent’s intent to fund the trust. Early document gathering clarifies the issues and can reveal straightforward evidence that supports a petition. Be sure to request records from title companies, banks, and the county recorder’s office as soon as possible. Timely collection reduces delays, helps your attorney assess the strength of a petition, and positions your case to move forward with a well-organized evidentiary presentation in court if needed.
Consulting legal counsel early in the process helps you identify the best strategy and minimize avoidable mistakes. Timely advice can guide you in preserving evidence, understanding deadlines, and coordinating with other professionals such as title officers or financial institutions. Early involvement also allows your legal team to assess whether a Heggstad petition, a quiet title action, or another remedy is the most suitable under the circumstances, and to prepare the strongest possible case while witnesses and documentation remain readily available.
Families consider a Heggstad petition when a decedent’s intent to fund a trust was clear but formal transfer steps were not completed prior to death. This situation can arise from missed deed recordings, unupdated beneficiary designations, or assets retained in an individual name despite planned funding. Pursuing a petition helps align title with the estate plan, facilitating trustee authority and avoiding probate. For many families, securing a judicial declaration provides peace of mind that the decedent’s intentions will be honored and assets will pass according to the trust terms rather than through probate.
Beyond honoring the decedent’s plan, a Heggstad petition can protect beneficiary interests and preserve asset value by avoiding delays or disputes that may arise in probate. This service is particularly valuable when property is needed for distribution, sale, or to satisfy ongoing obligations, and when title companies and banks require confirmation before releasing funds. Filing a petition can be a proactive step to prevent future litigation and to create a clear administrative path for trustees charged with managing and distributing trust assets under the terms laid out in the trust document.
Typical circumstances include recently executed trusts with incomplete funding, deeds prepared but not recorded, accounts left in an individual’s name, and beneficiary forms that were not updated to reflect trust intentions. Another frequent scenario is when a decedent believed an item had been transferred into a trust but steps were not finalized. Recognizing these patterns helps families anticipate potential problems and take steps before a death occurs, such as confirming title with the county recorder or ensuring beneficiary designations match the estate plan.
One common circumstance arises when real property was meant to be transferred into a trust but remained titled in the decedent’s name due to a missed recording or delay. In such cases, a Heggstad petition can ask the court to declare that the property should be treated as trust-owned based on the decedent’s intent. Evidence like unsigned drafts, contemporaneous communications, and prepared deeds can support the petition, enabling the trustee to manage or sell the property in accordance with the trust’s provisions.
Financial accounts that were intended to be transferred to a trust but were never retitled can create administrative complications for trustees. A Heggstad petition can establish that such accounts were meant to be trust property, enabling their transfer without full probate. Supporting documentation can include account opening instructions, beneficiary designation changes in process, or written statements from the decedent indicating intent. Addressing these issues through a legal filing helps ensure funds are distributed according to the trust and reduces paperwork and delay for beneficiaries.
In some cases, retirement accounts, life insurance policies, or other assets retain old beneficiary designations that do not align with the trust. When the decedent intended those assets to pass to the trust, a Heggstad petition can be part of the process to align ownership with that intent. Establishing the decedent’s intention often requires evidence such as draft designation forms, instructions left with advisors, or communications indicating a desire to fund the trust, which the court may rely upon in determining the proper disposition of those assets.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman assist residents of Guerneville and Sonoma County with trust funding issues including Heggstad petitions and related probate matters. We help clients evaluate their options, gather and present necessary documentation, and pursue the most efficient path to secure trust ownership. Our office handles communications with title companies, financial institutions, and the court, providing a practical legal framework for resolving asset-title discrepancies so trustees can carry out the decedent’s plan with legal clarity and minimal disruption.
Clients choose the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman for attentive, practical guidance through complex trust-funding issues. We prioritize understanding the family’s objectives, carefully reviewing all estate planning documents, and developing a strategy tailored to the facts. Our approach emphasizes thorough documentation, clear communication, and efficient case management to help move petitions forward effectively in Sonoma County probate court. We aim to minimize stress for families by handling procedural details and coordinating with relevant institutions to assemble a compelling record in support of the petition.
When title problems or funding oversights arise, prompt and organized legal action can make a meaningful difference in outcomes. Our team helps collect documentary evidence, prepare necessary petitions, and represent clients at hearings when required. We work collaboratively with trustees and beneficiaries to explain options and likely outcomes, and we strive to resolve matters without unnecessary delay or expense. Our goals are to restore asset alignment with the trust and to preserve family relationships through clear legal process and respectful advocacy.
Local knowledge of Sonoma County court procedures and recording practices helps our office anticipate procedural requirements and coordinate filings efficiently. We also assist clients in addressing related administrative matters such as title company questions, bank requests for documentation, and the preparation of supporting affidavits. By managing these steps, we seek to reduce the administrative burden on families while advancing the petition toward resolution so trustees can administer assets according to the decedent’s documented intentions.
Our process begins with a careful review of the trust, deeds, account records, and any estate planning communications to evaluate whether a petition is appropriate. We then gather documentary and witness evidence, prepare and file the petition with the probate court, and provide notice to interested parties. If necessary, we represent clients at hearings and assist with post-order recording or title transfers. Throughout, we keep clients informed about timelines and next steps, ensuring clarity and responsiveness during a sensitive period for the family.
Step one focuses on assembling relevant documents and conducting an initial legal assessment to determine the viability of a Heggstad petition. This stage includes reviewing trust instruments, deeds, account records, correspondence, and any drafts or handwritten notes indicating the decedent’s intent. We may contact title companies, banks, and the county recorder to obtain official records. A thorough early review helps identify evidentiary gaps and informs the strategy for presenting a persuasive case to the court, while enabling the client to understand likely timelines and potential outcomes.
We conduct a detailed review of the trust, wills, powers of attorney, and drafts that relate to the decedent’s intentions. This may reveal explicit funding instructions, language indicating intended transfers, or drafts prepared for recording. Such documents often form the backbone of a Heggstad petition by demonstrating the grantor’s intent to include certain assets in the trust. Careful analysis helps determine which items require a petition and which can be resolved administratively with minimal court involvement.
We obtain and review deeds, county recorder filings, bank statements, brokerage account records, and beneficiary forms to map actual ownership. This documentation is essential to identify discrepancies between titled ownership and intended trust ownership. Gathering authoritative records early supports the petition’s factual showing and helps the legal team anticipate any objections from third parties. Accurate records also facilitate post-order steps such as recording corrected deeds and updating account titles to reflect the trust’s ownership.
In the second stage, we prepare the petition for filing, which sets out the facts, legal arguments, and supporting evidence that demonstrate the decedent’s intent to fund the trust. The petition cites relevant documents, attaches records and affidavits, and identifies interested parties who must be given notice. Proper preparation ensures compliance with local probate rules and helps the court evaluate the claim efficiently. Filing initiates formal court review and triggers statutory notice requirements so that interested persons have an opportunity to respond.
We draft clear factual statements, supported by exhibits and witness affidavits, describing the decedent’s actions and communications that show intent to fund the trust. These materials explain the circumstances of failed transfers or incomplete recordings and present the legal basis for judicial relief. Crafting a persuasive narrative rooted in documentation is essential to helping the court understand why the requested order will effectuate the decedent’s intentions without unfairly prejudicing other interested parties.
After preparing the petition, we ensure all required notices are served on beneficiaries, trustees, heirs, and other interested individuals or entities. Proper notice is a legal prerequisite that allows parties to contest the petition if they disagree. Once filed, the court schedules consideration and may request additional information or set a hearing. Providing timely and accurate notice helps prevent procedural delays and supports the integrity of the process as the court assesses whether an order should be entered to treat the property as trust-owned.
If the court grants the petition, it issues an order that clarifies ownership and may direct how records should be updated. Following the order, we coordinate with title companies, the county recorder, banks, and other institutions to effectuate any necessary transfers or recordings. If the petition is contested, we represent clients in hearings and provide targeted evidence to support the request. The post-order phase is critical to ensure the court’s determination is properly implemented and that trustees receive the documentation they need to manage and distribute trust assets.
When hearings are required, we prepare witnesses and present documentary evidence to the court to demonstrate the decedent’s intent and the propriety of the requested relief. This may include testimony from the person who prepared trust documents, trustees, or others familiar with the decedent’s plans. Meticulous preparation for hearings ensures that the court has a clear view of the relevant facts and the legal rationale for treating the property as trust-owned, which supports a definitive ruling that can be implemented post-judgment.
After the court issues an order, we assist clients with recording corrected deeds, updating account titles, and obtaining confirmations from banks or title companies that recognize the trust’s ownership. Proper implementation prevents future disputes and ensures third parties accept the trustee’s authority. We also advise on any necessary supplemental filings to close related administrative matters. This final implementation step translates a favorable court ruling into practical control over assets so trustees can fulfill their fiduciary duties under the trust.
A Heggstad petition is a court action asking the probate court to treat property as belonging to a named trust even though formal transfer steps were not completed before death. It is typically used when an asset was intended to be trust property but remained titled in the decedent’s name because a deed was not recorded, an account was not retitled, or beneficiary designations were left unchanged. The petition presents evidence of the decedent’s intent so that the court can issue an order aligning legal title with the trust, thereby enabling trustees to administer the asset according to the trust terms. Families usually consider this remedy when they want to avoid the time and expense of full probate and when the documentary record supports a finding of intent. The petition process requires assembling trust documents, deeds or account records, and often affidavits from witnesses or professionals familiar with the decedent’s planning. If the court is satisfied that the decedent intended the transfer to the trust, it can order the necessary title corrections so that the asset is handled under the trust rather than through probate.
The timeline for a Heggstad petition varies depending on the complexity of the case, the need for additional evidence, and whether any interested parties contest the petition. In straightforward, uncontested matters with clear documentation, courts may resolve petitions in a matter of weeks to a few months, accounting for notice periods and scheduling. In contested or complex cases, or when additional discovery is required, the process can take several months or longer. Local court schedules and procedural requirements in Sonoma County also influence timing. Prompt document collection and early communication with potential interested parties can shorten the process. Providing complete records and affidavits at filing helps the court evaluate the matter efficiently. When disputes arise, additional hearings and discovery may be necessary, which extends the timeline. Our office aims to prepare a thorough initial filing to reduce the need for extended proceedings and to keep clients informed at each stage so they understand expected timelines and next steps.
Evidence that supports a Heggstad petition includes the trust document itself, draft deeds or recorded deeds with notations, correspondence indicating the decedent’s intent, and signed declarations prepared by the decedent or those assisting with estate planning. Testimony or affidavits from individuals who assisted with the trust or observed the decedent’s planning, such as attorneys, title officers, or family members, can also be persuasive. Bank or title records showing steps taken toward transfer, even if incomplete, help demonstrate a consistent intent to fund the trust. Contemporaneous documents and communications often carry significant weight, while gaps in documentation may require corroborating statements from credible witnesses. The court evaluates the totality of the evidence to determine whether the decedent intended a transfer to the trust. A carefully assembled evidentiary package increases the likelihood of obtaining an order that aligns ownership with the trust and supports subsequent administrative actions by the trustee.
A Heggstad petition can often avoid probate for the disputed asset by establishing that it should be treated as trust-owned, but it is not a universal guarantee that all probate will be avoided for all assets. If the petition is granted, the property identified in the petition is treated as part of the trust and administered accordingly, which can remove the need for probate on that particular asset. However, other assets titled solely in the decedent’s name or subject to separate issues may still require probate proceedings. Each case depends on the nature of the assets and the completeness of transfers. Where multiple assets or creditor issues exist, additional filings or concurrent proceedings could be necessary. Pursuing a Heggstad petition is often an important step toward minimizing probate exposure, especially for the specific property at issue, but a holistic review of the estate plan and asset titles helps determine whether other estate administration measures are also needed.
When a Heggstad petition is filed, rules require notice to interested parties such as trustees, beneficiaries, heirs, and certain creditors, so they have an opportunity to respond. The specific notice requirements depend on local probate rules and statutory provisions governing probate petitions. Proper service and notice are important to maintain procedural fairness and to prevent future challenges based on defective notice. Our office ensures that required parties receive appropriate notice and that filings comply with Sonoma County court protocols. Providing clear notice also allows interested persons to raise any concerns early in the process, which can lead to negotiated resolutions that avoid contested hearings. Where disputes arise, interested parties may file objections that the court will consider. Ensuring accurate and complete notice reduces procedural risks and supports the integrity of the court’s eventual order resolving the ownership question.
A trustee’s ability to act before a Heggstad petition is resolved depends on the asset’s title and the institution holding the property. If the asset remains titled in the decedent’s name, trustees typically lack the authority to manage or distribute it until title is corrected or the court grants appropriate relief. Financial institutions and title companies often require a court order or other documentation before releasing funds or transferring property into the trust’s name. In some situations, temporary administrative steps or conservatorship-like measures may be available, but these depend on the asset and legal context. Consulting with counsel promptly helps determine whether any provisional actions can be taken and what evidence or court orders will be required so the trustee can lawfully manage and protect the asset pending resolution of the petition.
If interested parties contest a Heggstad petition, the court may schedule hearings and require additional evidence, discovery, or legal briefing to resolve the dispute. Contested matters turn on the strength and credibility of documentary and testimonial evidence, and hearings allow both sides to present their positions. The court’s judgment will depend on whether the petitioner can convincingly demonstrate the decedent’s intent and whether contesting parties can show competing facts or legal reasons to deny the petition. Contested proceedings generally take longer and may involve more extensive legal work, but they also provide a structured forum to resolve disagreements. Our approach in contested matters includes careful preparation of exhibits and witness statements, strategic litigation planning, and efforts to explore settlement where appropriate to reach an efficient and fair resolution for the parties involved.
Alternatives to filing a Heggstad petition include pursuing a quiet title action for real property, administrative corrections with banks or title companies when they will accept supporting documents, or a limited probate action where appropriate. When parties are in agreement, private documentation and corrective recordings may resolve the issue without court intervention. However, institutions often require a court order for significant transfers or when disputes are foreseeable, making a petition the most reliable route in many cases. Choosing the right path depends on the asset type, the strength of available evidence, and whether interested parties consent to administrative remedies. Legal counsel can evaluate the pros and cons of alternate approaches, and help negotiate agreements or prepare filings that meet institutional requirements while seeking to minimize time and expense for the family.
Families can take several steps to reduce the need for a Heggstad petition, including regularly reviewing and confirming that all assets are properly titled in the trust, updating beneficiary designations to match the trust where applicable, and promptly recording deeds intended to transfer real property. Periodic checks with financial institutions and the county recorder help identify discrepancies early. Maintaining clear communication with the person who prepares estate documents and keeping copies of drafts and confirmations also provides evidence if funding issues arise. Proactive estate maintenance and coordination with estate planners and title professionals minimize the chances that assets will be omitted inadvertently. When changes occur in property ownership or account status, updating records promptly helps ensure the trust reflects the decedent’s intentions and reduces the likelihood of post-death corrective litigation.
To begin the Heggstad petition process with our firm, reach out by phone or email for an initial consultation to review the trust and the asset records. We will request copies of relevant documents such as deeds, trust instruments, account statements, and any correspondence that reflects the decedent’s intent. During the initial meeting, we assess the facts, outline potential strategies, and provide guidance on likely timelines and evidence needs for a petition in Sonoma County. After the evaluation, our office helps collect additional records, prepares the petition and supporting affidavits, and coordinates notice and filing with the court. We remain available to answer questions throughout the process and to assist with post-order actions such as recording deeds and updating account titles so trustees can manage and distribute assets according to the trust.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas