If you are considering changes to an existing trust in Rohnert Park, a trust modification petition can provide a legal route to update terms, remove or add beneficiaries, or address changed circumstances. The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman serve clients across Sonoma County and California with focused estate planning services including trust modification petitions, revocable living trusts, and related documents. This page outlines what a petition involves, when it may be appropriate, and how our team approaches each matter with careful attention to the client’s goals and to applicable California law and local court procedures. We are available by phone at 408-528-2827 to discuss your situation.
Trust modification petitions often arise when life events, tax law changes, family circumstances, or errors in the original document require legal intervention to correct or adapt the trust’s terms. This page explains the differences between informal amendments, formal modifications, and court petitions, and describes the likely steps and timelines you may encounter in Sonoma County. Our goal is to help you understand the options available, the potential consequences for beneficiaries and asset disposition, and the documentation that will support a successful petition. We emphasize clear communication to help clients make informed, practical decisions for their estate plans.
A trust modification petition can protect the settlor’s intent and preserve the value of the estate by correcting outdated or problematic trust provisions. When circumstances change—such as remarriage, the birth of children, a beneficiary’s incapacity, or significant changes in asset composition—a petition can realign the trust with current wishes while addressing legal and tax implications. Courts may approve modifications to avoid unintended disinheritance or to resolve ambiguities in the trust language. The benefit of seeking a petition rather than leaving an unresolved issue is greater certainty for trustees, beneficiaries, and fiduciaries, reducing the likelihood of future disputes and costly litigation.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provide estate planning services across California, with particular focus on Sonoma County matters. Our practice handles revocable living trusts, trust modification petitions, Heggstad petitions, and related probate and trust filings. We emphasize client-centered planning that balances legal requirements with practical outcomes, and we work closely with trustees and family members to minimize conflict. Our approach includes a thorough review of trust documents, careful assessment of alternatives, and clear guidance on the court process when a petition is needed. Clients rely on us for responsive communication and methodical case preparation.
A trust modification petition is a formal request filed in court to modify the terms of a trust when the settlor or interested parties cannot accomplish the desired change through amendment or when the trust’s text is ambiguous or problematic. California law provides mechanisms for court-ordered modifications in cases of mistake, changed circumstances, or when the modification is necessary to achieve the trust’s intent. The petition should explain the legal basis for the requested relief, present supporting facts and documentation, and identify all interested parties for proper notice. The process aims to ensure fairness and legal validity while protecting beneficiaries’ rights.
Before pursuing a petition, it is important to evaluate whether a revocable trust can be amended by the settlor, whether beneficiaries agree to a settlement, or whether non-judicial options are available. If a settlor lacks capacity or is unavailable, or if the trust includes irrevocable provisions, the court may be asked to modify terms to prevent unintended consequences. Filing a petition typically involves drafting pleadings, serving notice, and possibly attending hearings. Courts may consider evidence such as the trust instrument, related estate planning documents, correspondence, and testimony about the settlor’s intent and the circumstances prompting the request.
A trust modification petition is a judicial filing seeking an order that changes specific provisions of an existing trust. The petition must articulate why the modification is necessary and how it aligns with applicable law and the settlor’s intent. Typical grounds include mistakes in drafting, changes in law or circumstances that frustrate the trust’s purpose, or the need to add or remove a trustee or beneficiary. The petition will identify all parties with a legal interest, recommend specific changes, and include supporting evidence. The court then evaluates whether the requested modification is appropriate and consistent with the trust’s substance.
Key elements of a trust modification petition include a clear statement of the relief requested, factual background explaining the reasons for modification, citation to relevant statutory or case law, and proposed amended language where appropriate. The process typically begins with a petition and supporting declarations, followed by service on beneficiaries and other interested parties. Courts may schedule a hearing, consider objections, and require additional evidence or mediation. Final orders are drafted to reflect the court’s decision and provide instructions to trustees for implementing changes. Attention to procedural detail is essential to avoid delays or complications.
Understanding common terms used in trust modification proceedings can make the process less intimidating. This glossary clarifies phrases such as settlor, trustee, beneficiary, revocable trust, irrevocable trust, Heggstad petition, pour-over will, and certification of trust. Knowing these definitions helps clients recognize their rights and obligations and assists with evaluating whether a petition is appropriate. The glossary entries below provide plain-language explanations and context for how these terms arise in petitions, notices, and court orders. Clear definitions reduce uncertainty and support informed decision-making during the modification process.
The settlor is the person who creates the trust and sets its terms and instructions for asset management and distribution. In trust modification proceedings, courts often seek to honor the settlor’s original intent while addressing changes or mistakes in the trust documentation. If the settlor is alive and has capacity, many modifications can be accomplished without court involvement through a standard amendment. However, when the settlor lacks capacity or is deceased, interested parties may petition the court to modify the trust to better reflect the settlor’s aims or to correct errors. Evidence of the settlor’s intent is central to such petitions.
A trustee is the individual or entity responsible for administering the trust in accordance with its terms and fiduciary duties under California law. Trustees may face decisions about implementing court-ordered modifications, serving notices to beneficiaries, and managing trust assets while a petition is pending. When a trustee’s actions or proposed changes are in dispute, the court may evaluate whether the trustee has acted within the authority granted by the trust instrument. Trustees have a duty to act impartially for the benefit of all beneficiaries and to follow any court directives that alter the trust’s administration or distribution provisions.
A beneficiary is a person or organization entitled to receive benefits under the trust, whether income, principal, or other distributions. Beneficiaries are typically required to receive notice of a trust modification petition because they may be affected by proposed changes. The court considers beneficiaries’ interests when determining whether to approve a modification, and beneficiaries may object or propose alternative solutions. Clear, timely communication with beneficiaries and careful documentation of the reasons for changes help courts balance competing interests and reach a result that preserves fairness and the integrity of the trust plan.
A Heggstad petition is a specific California procedure used to transfer assets to a trust when assets were intended to be included but were not properly titled in the trust’s name during the settlor’s lifetime. This petition asks the court to declare that certain assets belong to the trust and to direct their transfer. It often arises when there is a mismatch between the settlor’s estate planning documents and the actual asset ownership records. The Heggstad process requires evidence such as drafting records, beneficiary lists, and testimony regarding intent, and can resolve unintended gaps in trust funding without full probate administration.
When a trust requires change, there are several potential routes: a direct amendment by the settlor, a written agreement among beneficiaries and trustees, or a petition to the court. If the settlor is able and willing, a simple amendment or restatement is usually the fastest and least expensive path. When beneficiaries consent, a signed agreement that rewrites contested provisions may avoid court proceedings. A petition becomes necessary when parties disagree, the settlor lacks capacity, or legal issues require judicial clarification. The choice among these options depends on the facts, legal constraints, and the willingness of parties to negotiate.
If the settlor is alive and has the necessary decision-making capacity, most modifications can be handled directly by executing a formal amendment or a restated trust document. This route is straightforward when the settlor’s wishes are clear and there are no competing claims from beneficiaries or creditors. Proper execution formalities should be followed to ensure validity, which may include notarization and witness signatures as specified by state law. When possible, updating beneficiary designations and retitling assets can achieve the desired result without involving the courts, saving time and expense for the estate.
When trustees and beneficiaries can reach a voluntary agreement that addresses the disputed terms, a written settlement or stipulated modification can often replace the need for a contested court action. Such agreements should be documented carefully and executed with appropriate formalities. In many cases, the parties may request the court to enter an order reflecting the agreed changes, providing enforceability and finality. Reaching consensus eliminates much of the uncertainty and costs associated with litigation and allows the trust to be administered according to the negotiated terms rather than an imposed judicial solution.
When family dynamics are complex, there is a risk that proposed changes will prompt challenges or unintended consequences. In such cases, a comprehensive legal approach can include detailed fact gathering, negotiation with interested parties, and careful pleadings to support a petition if necessary. The attorney’s role is to frame the legal issues, prepare persuasive documentation, and pursue the outcome that best serves the settlor’s intent while protecting beneficiary rights. Comprehensive preparation helps minimize surprises in court and promotes a smoother resolution of contested trust matters.
When trust assets are substantial or when modifications could create significant tax implications, a complete legal review is important to avoid unintended results. A comprehensive approach assesses the effect of proposed changes on income tax, estate tax, creditor claims, and retirement or insurance designations. Coordinating with financial and tax advisors may be necessary to implement changes that preserve value and maintain intended protections for beneficiaries. Legal filings are drafted to anticipate potential challenges and to align trust provisions with the settlor’s broader financial and estate planning objectives.
A comprehensive approach to trust modification provides clarity, enforceability, and protection against future disputes. By documenting the reasons for changes and obtaining court approval when needed, trustees and beneficiaries gain a definitive order that reduces ambiguity. That formal resolution helps trustees carry out distributions and manage assets with confidence, and it limits the potential for later challenges. In many situations, the certainty obtained through a properly prepared petition outweighs the additional time and expense involved in the court process, particularly in families with competing interests or significant estates.
Comprehensively handled matters also tend to preserve relationships by establishing transparent processes and providing neutral adjudication where voluntary agreement is not possible. Courts consider facts, legal principles, and the settlor’s intent, producing orders that are enforceable and clear. This structured outcome prevents piecemeal changes that could create inconsistencies or disputes later. Where coordinated planning includes updating related documents—such as wills, powers of attorney, and healthcare directives—the entire estate plan functions more cohesively and reliably for trustees and beneficiaries alike.
Obtaining a judicial order for a trust modification provides legal certainty that informal or disputed changes may lack. The court’s decision clarifies rights, duties, and the proper interpretation of trust language, reducing the chance of future litigation. This finality is particularly valuable for trustees who must administer assets and make distributions in accordance with the hybrid of the trust’s original terms and the court-approved modifications. Documented court rulings serve as a reliable roadmap for trustees and beneficiaries and help preserve the integrity of the estate plan over time.
A thorough legal process ensures that beneficiary rights are considered and that trustees receive clear instructions for administering the trust after modification. Courts weigh the interests of all parties and can craft remedies that balance competing needs while remaining faithful to the settlor’s intent. This oversight reduces the potential for trustee liability stemming from uncertain or disputed instructions. Where complicated distributions or asset transfers are at issue, a court-approved modification offers practical protection for trustees undertaking their duties and for beneficiaries expecting fair treatment under the trust.
Begin by gathering all relevant estate planning documents, asset records, and communications that reflect the settlor’s intent. Documentation such as draft versions, correspondence with estate planners, and records of asset transfers can be essential support for a petition. Accurate and organized evidence strengthens the petition and helps clarify whether a court action is necessary. Early fact-finding also identifies potential procedural issues, necessary notices to beneficiaries, and whether a Heggstad petition or other filings may be more appropriate than a broad modification request. Organized preparation reduces delays and increases the chances of a favorable resolution.
If the proposed modification has tax or financial implications, coordinate closely with accountants or financial planners to understand possible consequences. Changes affecting retirement accounts, life insurance trusts, or investment holdings may trigger tax reporting, beneficiary designation conflicts, or unintended distributions. A coordinated approach can structure the modification to minimize tax impact and to align asset titling and beneficiary designations with the revised trust terms. Advance planning can reduce surprises after the court order is entered and help trustees implement the changes efficiently.
People often seek trust modification petitions when the original trust fails to account for life changes like remarriage, divorce, births, deaths, or relocations. Other reasons include correcting drafting errors or resolving ambiguities that could result in inconsistent administration. Changes in tax law or financial circumstances may also prompt a petition to preserve estate value or to adjust distribution timing. Additionally, when assets were neglected during funding or titled incorrectly, a petition such as a Heggstad request can bring those assets into the trust to effectuate the settlor’s stated plan.
Another common trigger is when the settlor loses capacity and no clear mechanism exists to amend the trust in accordance with changed intentions. In such situations, interested parties may petition the court for modification to prevent outcomes that would have been inconsistent with the settlor’s probable wishes. Trustee disputes, conflicting beneficiary expectations, or evidence of drafting mistakes also justify court intervention to clarify and correct the trust document. The goal in these proceedings is to restore alignment between the trust instrument and the settlor’s objectives while protecting legal rights.
Circumstances that commonly lead to trust modification petitions include errors in asset titling, unclear trust provisions, changes in family structure, and the settlor’s incapacity. Errors discovered after the settlor’s death—such as assets still in the settlor’s name—can be resolved with a Heggstad petition. Other situations involve correcting trustee appointment language, updating distribution schedules for changed financial needs, or resolving conflicts between beneficiary designations and trust terms. Each of these situations requires tailored legal consideration to determine the appropriate filing strategy and documentation.
When assets intended to be part of the trust remain under the settlor’s personal title, beneficiaries and trustees may need to pursue a judicial remedy to align asset ownership with the estate plan. A Heggstad petition or other court filing can ask the court to declare that specific assets were meant to belong to the trust and to order their transfer. Such petitions rely on evidence of intent, including drafting notes, beneficiary lists, or communications with advisors. Proper documentation and a clear factual record are critical to persuading the court to recognize the trust interest.
Sometimes trust instruments contain ambiguous provisions that create uncertainty about distributions, trustee powers, or interpretation of key terms. In these cases, a petition can request judicial interpretation or modification to ensure the trust functions as intended. Courts prefer to honor the settlor’s intent and may reform the trust language where a mistake or ambiguity is shown. Presenting a persuasive factual record, including extrinsic evidence of intent, can help the court resolve the ambiguity and provide guidance for trustees in administering the trust correctly.
Life events such as remarriage, the birth of grandchildren, divorce, or significant changes in financial circumstances may render certain trust provisions outdated or inequitable. A petition can adjust distribution schedules, change contingent beneficiary designations, or provide for new needs like long-term care funding or support for a dependent with disabilities. The court will consider whether the proposed change aligns with the settlor’s intent and whether it is necessary to prevent frustration of the trust’s purpose. Well-documented reasons and proposed language aid the court’s decision-making.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provides trust modification services to residents of Rohnert Park and surrounding Sonoma County communities. We help clients assess whether amendments, agreements, or petitions are appropriate and guide them through the chosen process. Our practice assists with drafting pleadings, gathering evidence such as funding records and correspondence, notifying interested parties, and representing clients at court hearings if required. We strive to manage proceedings efficiently while keeping clients informed at every step and focusing on outcomes that align with the settlor’s documented intentions and family needs.
Clients select our firm for trust modification matters because we combine thorough legal analysis with practical planning to address both technical and interpersonal aspects of trust disputes. We begin by carefully reviewing existing estate planning documents, asset titles, and any relevant correspondence to determine the most appropriate legal path. Whether a nonjudicial amendment, negotiated settlement, or court petition is necessary, we prepare clear documentation aimed at achieving a durable resolution that reflects the settlor’s intent and protects beneficiary interests.
We place emphasis on transparent communication about likely timelines, potential costs, and the procedural steps required by Sonoma County courts. Early identification of evidentiary needs and procedural requirements helps avoid unnecessary delays. We also consider related estate planning tasks—such as updating wills, powers of attorney, and healthcare directives—to ensure the entire plan functions cohesively after any modification. By coordinating expected changes across documents, we help reduce the likelihood of future disputes or administrative confusion.
Our approach also includes contingency planning for disputed matters, including preparing clear petitions, serving proper notice, and pursuing negotiated resolutions when possible. We work to protect the interests of trustees and beneficiaries by drafting court-ready pleadings and by compiling supporting evidence that establishes the factual basis for requested changes. Clients appreciate our practical orientation and consistent communication, which aim to reduce stress and provide clarity during what can be a challenging period for families addressing changes to an estate plan.
Our process begins with a focused intake to understand the trust documents, the settlor’s circumstances, and the objectives behind the requested change. We then gather supporting records, identify interested parties, and evaluate alternatives such as direct amendment or negotiated agreement. If a petition is the best path, we prepare pleadings that present the legal basis and factual support, serve proper notice, and file with the appropriate Sonoma County court. We will attend hearings, respond to objections, and seek clear court orders to guide trustees in implementing the modification.
During the initial review, we collect the trust instrument, any amendments, related estate planning documents like wills and powers of attorney, and records of asset ownership. We also gather communications that may show the settlor’s intent, such as drafts or correspondence with advisors. This evidence forms the factual foundation for any petition. We assess whether nonjudicial options are viable and advise on the strength of potential petitions. Clear, organized documentation at this stage improves the quality of the petition and helps anticipate possible objections from interested parties.
We analyze the trust instrument to identify ambiguities, drafting errors, or provisions that conflict with current law or family circumstances. This assessment includes examining the trust’s funding status and whether assets are titled to the trust. Understanding the settlor’s original intent is essential for framing a persuasive petition, and we use documentary evidence and interviews to build that record. Early assessment helps determine whether a simple amendment, a negotiated agreement among parties, or a court petition will best achieve the desired outcome with minimal disruption.
Gathering evidence includes assembling financial records, title documents, correspondence, and any prior drafts of estate planning documents. Identifying and notifying interested parties is also a critical procedural step that preserves rights and prevents later jurisdictional challenges. Proper notice typically includes trustees, beneficiaries, and possibly creditors depending on the relief sought. Early notification encourages resolution efforts and ensures that any petition filed will proceed without procedural defects related to notice or service of documents.
If a petition is necessary, we draft pleadings that clearly state the relief requested, provide a factual narrative, and cite legal authorities supporting modification. The petition will propose specific revised language or ask the court to interpret or reform problematic terms. Alongside the petition we file declarations and supporting exhibits to document the settlor’s intent and the circumstances prompting the petition. Properly prepared filings anticipate potential objections and set the stage for productive court proceedings or settlement discussions.
Supporting declarations typically include sworn statements from people with direct knowledge of the settlor’s intent and the facts that justify modification. Exhibits may include prior drafts of the trust, correspondence with planners, and records showing asset ownership. These materials help the court determine whether a reform or modification is appropriate. Careful preparation of the evidentiary record helps streamline hearings and provides a clear factual basis for the requested changes. The goal is to present a concise, persuasive package that courts can evaluate efficiently.
Once the petition and supporting materials are filed, proper service on all interested parties is required under California procedures. Parties then have an opportunity to respond or object. When objections arise, we assess whether negotiation, mediation, or formal responses are the best course. Court hearings may be scheduled to resolve contested issues. We prepare our clients for the likely procedural steps and potential outcomes and represent them in settlement negotiations or at hearings to pursue the most practical resolution consistent with the settlor’s intent and applicable law.
After hearings and any required briefing, the court issues an order either granting, denying, or modifying the requested relief. If the court approves the modification, the order will specify the revised trust terms and provide instructions for trustees regarding asset management and distributions. Our role includes assisting trustees with compliance, updating related documents, and ensuring that assets are retitled or transferred as directed. We follow through to confirm that the court’s order is implemented properly so the trust functions according to the revised plan.
When a court order is issued, we review its terms with trustees and beneficiaries and assist in taking the practical steps needed to implement the change. This may include retitling assets, updating beneficiary designations, or filing additional documents with financial institutions. We work to ensure the administrative obligations are completed and to reduce the risk of future disputes by documenting compliance and communicating required actions to trustees. Proper follow-through helps translate legal relief into practical results for the estate and beneficiaries.
After implementation, we recommend a comprehensive review of the overall estate plan to confirm alignment between the trust, will, powers of attorney, and healthcare directives. This review helps identify any remaining inconsistencies and ensures beneficiary designations and asset titles reflect the revised trust structure. Updating related documents reduces the risk of future conflicts or administrative problems and helps preserve the settlor’s intended distribution plan. Final documentation is kept with the client and relevant institutions so trustees and successors have ready access to the updated plan.
A trust modification petition is a legal filing asking the court to change specific terms of an existing trust or to resolve ambiguities that prevent proper administration. Courts consider petitions when parties cannot accomplish changes by amendment, when the settlor lacks capacity, or when there is evidence of drafting mistakes or changed circumstances that frustrate the trust’s purpose. The petition must identify the requested relief, provide a factual basis for the change, and include supporting declarations and exhibits that demonstrate the settlor’s intent or the necessity of the modification. Proper notice to interested parties is a procedural requirement to protect beneficiary rights. The court then evaluates whether the proposed modification aligns with the settlor’s intent and applicable law. Depending on the facts, the court may grant, deny, or tailor the modification to address competing interests while preserving the trust’s original objectives to the extent possible.
Yes. If the settlor is alive and has capacity to make decisions, they can usually amend or restate a revocable trust directly without court involvement. Formalities should be observed when executing amendments, including any witness or notary requirements referenced in the trust document. When the settlor can act, this approach is usually faster and less costly than a petition. However, if the settlor is incapacitated, deceased, or if beneficiaries dispute the change, a court petition may become necessary to resolve the issue. Even when the settlor can act, updating related documents and retitling assets may be advisable to ensure the amendment is fully effective across the estate plan.
A Heggstad petition is a specific California court action used to bring assets into a trust that were intended to be part of it but were not properly titled or transferred during the settlor’s lifetime. Unlike a modification to the trust’s terms, a Heggstad petition addresses funding issues by asking the court to declare that particular assets belong to the trust. The petition relies on evidence such as draft documents, correspondence, or other indications of intent to show the settlor intended the assets to be part of the trust. Court approval effectively aligns asset ownership with the settlor’s plan without resorting to full probate, provided sufficient evidence supports the claim.
The timeline for a trust modification petition in Sonoma County varies based on the complexity of the facts, the number of interested parties, and the court’s schedule. Simple, uncontested matters may resolve in a few months if parties agree or if the evidence is straightforward. Contested petitions with objections, additional discovery, or evidentiary hearings can take longer, potentially six months to a year or more. Early identification of evidentiary needs and efficient service and pleading preparation help avoid unnecessary delay. Working with counsel to pursue settlement options can also significantly shorten the time required to reach a final resolution.
Yes. California procedure generally requires that beneficiaries and other interested parties receive notice of a trust modification petition so they have an opportunity to respond and protect their rights. Proper service is critical to avoid procedural defects that could delay or invalidate the petition. Notice helps ensure the court considers all affected interests and gives parties a chance to object or to negotiate a settlement. In some cases, parties who receive notice may choose to resolve matters without litigation, while in others they may file objections that lead to hearings and further evidence gathering.
Useful evidence to support a petition includes prior drafts of the trust, correspondence with estate planners or advisors, financial records showing intent to fund the trust, and sworn declarations from witnesses who can attest to the settlor’s intentions. Documentation of asset ownership, beneficiary designation forms, and emails or letters referencing the settlor’s wishes strengthen the petition. Clear, organized exhibits that demonstrate the reasons for modification and that the requested changes align with the settlor’s intent provide persuasive support for judicial relief. A well-prepared evidentiary record reduces the need for extended hearings and helps courts reach clear conclusions.
Yes. If the settlor is incapacitated, a trustee or interested party may petition the court to modify the trust when necessary to achieve the settlor’s probable intent or to address changed circumstances that the settlor cannot address personally. The petition must present evidence showing why the modification is necessary and how it aligns with the settlor’s objectives. Courts carefully evaluate such petitions to ensure modifications are not contrary to the settlor’s documented wishes and that the interests of beneficiaries are protected. Proper notice and supporting evidence are essential when a settlor cannot act directly.
A trust modification can have tax implications depending on the nature of the changes and the types of assets involved. For example, modifications that alter distribution timing, change grantor trust status, or affect retirement account designations may create tax reporting consequences. It is advisable to consult with a tax advisor when contemplating modifications that could influence estate, income, or transfer tax exposure. Coordinated planning helps craft modifications that minimize adverse tax outcomes while preserving the settlor’s overall objectives. Counsel can incorporate tax considerations into the petition and recommended language to reduce unintended results.
Alternatives to court petitions include direct amendments by the settlor if they have capacity, negotiated settlement agreements among beneficiaries and trustees, or mediation to resolve disputes. When parties can reach a consensual solution, documenting the agreement and, where appropriate, submitting a stipulated order to the court can provide finality without a contested hearing. Nonjudicial approaches tend to be faster and less costly, and they can preserve family relationships by avoiding adversarial court proceedings. However, when consensus is not possible or when the settlor is unavailable or incapacitated, a petition may be the most reliable path to a binding resolution.
To begin addressing a trust problem, gather the trust document, any amendments, relevant financial records, and correspondence that reflects the settlor’s intent. Contact a law firm experienced in estate planning and trust matters to schedule an initial consultation, during which the attorney will review the documents and advise on possible courses of action. Early preparation of supporting evidence and identification of interested parties can streamline the process if a petition is required. Taking prompt steps to document issues and to explore nonjudicial options often preserves rights and reduces the risk of later disputes.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas