If you are considering changing the terms of a trust in Sonoma, a trust modification petition may be necessary to update beneficiaries, adjust distributions, correct errors, or respond to changed circumstances. At the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman, we help clients understand when a formal petition is needed and what court procedures may apply. This guide outlines the legal framework in California, practical steps for preparing and filing a petition, and common outcomes. We focus on clear planning, protecting intentions, and minimizing delays so families can resolve trust issues efficiently and with care for all involved parties.
A trust modification petition is a legal request to a court to approve changes to an existing trust when the terms cannot be adjusted privately or when third-party approval is required. This process may involve notice to interested persons, legal review of the trust’s terms, and evidence showing why the modification is appropriate under California law. Whether the change is minor or substantial, proper documentation and persuasive legal argumentation help the court reach the desired result. We explain each step, possible objections, and how to protect the trust’s intent while addressing beneficiaries’ needs and concerns.
Filing a trust modification petition is often the most reliable way to make legally binding changes when private amendment is not feasible. Benefits include clarifying ambiguous provisions, updating distribution terms, correcting drafting errors, and addressing changed personal or financial circumstances. A petition ensures that all interested parties receive proper notice and that the court reviews the proposed changes for fairness and legality. By resolving disputes under court supervision, families can avoid future litigation and protect assets for beneficiaries. The process also creates a documented record of the change, which can prevent confusion and protect trustees from later challenges or liability.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provides estate planning and trust litigation services from our San Jose office, assisting clients throughout Sonoma County and the wider Bay Area. Our approach emphasizes careful analysis of trust documents, thoughtful communication with family members, and diligent preparation of court filings where necessary. We focus on delivering practical solutions that uphold clients’ wishes while reducing conflict and cost. By combining procedural knowledge with attention to each family’s unique circumstances, we aim to guide clients through trust modification petitions with clarity and steady support throughout the courtroom and settlement processes.
A trust modification petition is a formal legal request asking a probate court to approve changes to an existing trust when the trust instrument or parties’ circumstances prevent a private amendment. Common reasons include ambiguous language, a trustee’s inability to perform duties, changed family relationships, or newly discovered assets. The court evaluates whether the proposed modification aligns with state law and the trust’s original intention. Petitioners must follow court rules for notice, provide supporting declarations, and address any objections. Understanding these procedural requirements is essential to avoid delays or denials when seeking judicial approval.
Trust modification petitions can vary in complexity depending on the trust’s terms and the parties involved. Some petitions request relatively minor updates, such as correcting typographical errors or specifying distribution procedures, while others seek substantive changes like reallocating shares or replacing a trustee. The court will consider the settlor’s intent, whether the settlor is incapacitated or deceased, and any legal standards applicable to the requested change. Preparing a persuasive petition requires assembling relevant documents, witness declarations, and legal authorities to show the court why the modification is appropriate and fair to beneficiaries.
A trust modification petition is filed in probate court to request judicial authority to alter a trust when private amendment is impractical or contested. California law provides mechanisms for modifications under specific circumstances, such as when the settlor’s intent is unclear, when compliance with the current terms is impossible, or when the settlor and beneficiaries seek court oversight. The petition sets forth the requested changes, the factual basis supporting them, and the legal grounds for court approval. By presenting documented reasons and notifying interested parties, petitioners seek a binding court order that ensures changes are enforceable and transparent.
Successful trust modification petitions typically include a clear statement of the proposed changes, documentary evidence of the trust instrument and any amendments, declarations from interested parties or witnesses, and a legal memorandum explaining the court’s authority to grant relief. The process requires compliance with notice rules to beneficiaries and other interested persons, opportunities for objections, and possible hearings where the court examines the evidence. Settlement or mediation may resolve disputes before a hearing. Attention to procedural detail and thorough preparation of supporting documents helps ensure the court can act promptly and with a full understanding of the requested modifications.
Understanding common legal terms helps demystify the trust modification process. This brief glossary highlights words you will encounter when preparing a petition, reading court orders, or communicating with beneficiaries and trustees. Clear definitions assist in setting expectations, recognizing legal requirements, and preparing accurate filings. Familiarity with these terms also improves communication with your attorney and supports informed decision making at each stage of the process. Below are concise explanations of the most frequently used terms in trust modification matters in California probate court.
A trust is a legal arrangement in which one person or entity holds property for the benefit of others under terms set by the trust instrument. The creator of the trust, often called the settlor, outlines how assets should be managed and distributed, names a trustee to administer the trust, and designates beneficiaries who will receive benefits. Trusts can be revocable or irrevocable and may include detailed provisions governing distributions, successor trustees, and conditions for modification. Understanding the trust document is the first step when considering any change through a petition filed in probate court.
A petition is a formal written request submitted to the court asking for a judicial order. In trust cases, a petition explains the requested modification, the factual and legal bases for the request, and identifies interested parties who must be notified. The petition must be accompanied by supporting documents and declarations that provide evidence for the court to consider. Courts use petitions to evaluate whether a requested change complies with law and the settlor’s intent, and whether the modification is fair to beneficiaries. Properly drafted petitions increase the likelihood of a prompt and favorable decision.
A modification refers to a change made to the terms of a trust, which can range from clarifying language to changing distributions or appointing a new trustee. Some trusts allow informal amendments by the settlor while alive, but when the settlor is unavailable or beneficiaries disagree, a court-ordered modification may be required. The court considers the original intent of the trust and applicable statutes to determine whether to permit the proposed change. Documentation demonstrating the need for modification, including declarations and relevant background, supports the petition before the probate court.
An interested person includes beneficiaries, trustees, conservators, guardians, and others with a legal or financial stake in the trust’s administration or outcome. These individuals are entitled to notice of petitions affecting the trust and have the opportunity to object or respond. Proper notification ensures transparency and allows the court to consider differing viewpoints before issuing an order. Identifying and communicating with interested persons early reduces surprises, supports settlement discussions, and helps the court evaluate whether the proposed modification is equitable and consistent with the trust’s objectives.
When changes to a trust are needed, parties can consider several approaches depending on the trust terms and the settlor’s status. Options include private amendment by the settlor, mutual agreement among beneficiaries and trustees, nonjudicial settlement agreements, or a court petition for modification. Each option has tradeoffs in terms of formality, time, cost, and the level of court involvement. Private resolution can be faster and less expensive but may not be available in contested situations. A court petition provides finality and enforceability when disputes arise or the trust requires judicial oversight, and courts often favor solutions that preserve the settlor’s intent.
A limited, nonjudicial approach is often suitable when the settlor is competent and able to amend the trust directly under the trust’s own amendment provisions. If the trust expressly permits changes by the settlor and the amendment does not impair third-party rights, updating terms privately can be efficient and private. This path avoids court involvement, reduces costs, and maintains confidentiality. It is important to follow the trust’s formal amendment requirements, including any signatures or witnesses, to ensure the change is valid and enforceable should questions arise later.
A nonjudicial resolution may also be appropriate when all beneficiaries and the trustee agree to the proposed change and the trust or state law allows a written agreement to replace court action. When parties reach a voluntary settlement, they can document the modification through a signed agreement, avoiding court fees and public filings. Such an approach requires clear consent from all interested persons and careful drafting to ensure the agreement fully reflects the parties’ intentions and complies with any statutory formalities that govern nonjudicial adjustments to trusts.
A comprehensive approach is often required when beneficiaries disagree, the settlor is incapacitated or deceased, or the trust language is ambiguous. In these situations, a court petition provides a forum to resolve disputes, assess evidence, and issue an enforceable order. The court can interpret intent, weigh competing claims, and provide remedies that private agreements cannot. Preparing for court involves gathering documentation, obtaining declarations, and anticipating objections. A thorough, court-focused strategy seeks to protect the trust’s purpose while navigating fiduciary duties and statutory requirements.
When trust modifications affect significant assets, tax implications, or creditor rights, a comprehensive legal review and formal court process may be the safest path. Courts can authorize changes that address complex financial arrangements, protect retirement accounts or life insurance structures, and manage creditor claims. Detailed legal analysis and careful drafting are essential to avoid unintended tax consequences or exposure to claims. A court order provides public, enforceable validation of the changes, reducing the risk of future disputes over asset distribution or trustee authority.
A comprehensive, court-approved modification yields several practical benefits, including legal finality, enforceability, and an official record of the change. Court involvement ensures that all interested parties receive notice and have the opportunity to be heard, which reduces the chance of successful challenges in the future. When modified through the probate court, the change is less likely to be disputed and provides trustees with clear authority to act. This approach is particularly valuable when dealing with contested matters, complex assets, or substantial family disagreements that require an impartial determination.
Another advantage of a comprehensive approach is that it creates a transparent process that can preserve relationships while resolving substantive issues. Court proceedings allow structured negotiation, mediation, or settlement talks under judicial oversight, which can encourage compromise and avoid protracted litigation. The formal process can also identify and resolve ancillary matters such as successor trustee appointments or protective provisions for vulnerable beneficiaries. Overall, court approval may cost more and take longer, but it often provides the clarity and protectiveness families need for long-term peace of mind.
One major benefit of seeking court approval is legal finality, which protects trustees and beneficiaries by creating a binding order. Trustees who follow a court-approved modification can rely on the ruling to guide distributions and administration without fear of later successful challenges. The court’s involvement clarifies rights, responsibilities, and the intended application of the trust’s provisions, reducing ambiguity and liability. This protection can be especially important when trustees must act in complex financial situations or when potential conflicts among beneficiaries might otherwise create uncertainty.
A court-based process provides a structured environment for resolving disputes and achieving a legally enforceable outcome. By presenting evidence, legal arguments, and proposed orders, parties can obtain definite answers about the application of trust terms and the validity of proposed changes. The resulting judicial order reduces the risk of future litigation and promotes certainty for beneficiaries and fiduciaries. This clarity helps protect assets and ensures that the settlor’s long-term intentions are carried out in a manner consistent with legal standards and the family’s needs.
Collecting the original trust document, any amendments, related wills, powers of attorney, and prior court orders is essential before filing a petition. Comprehensive documentation helps clarify the settlor’s intent and demonstrates the trust’s history to the court. Also gather financial statements, asset titles, beneficiary contact information, and any correspondence that relates to the requested change. Having a complete and organized file reduces delays, supports clear declarations, and makes it easier to respond to objections. Proper preparation improves the accuracy and persuasiveness of the petition and helps the court evaluate the request efficiently.
Before or during the court process, consider mediation or settlement discussions to resolve disagreements without protracted litigation. Mediation provides a neutral setting where parties can negotiate solutions that might not be available through a purely adversarial process. Even when a court petition is necessary, engaging in settlement talks can streamline issues for the judge and reduce costs. Prepare realistic proposals and document any tentative agreements in writing. Courts often view reasonable settlement efforts favorably, and an agreed resolution can provide a faster, more private, and less contentious path to modifying trust terms.
You should consider a trust modification petition when the trust’s terms are unclear, when circumstances have changed materially since the trust was created, or when parties cannot reach a private agreement to alter the trust. Other triggers include drafting errors that impair administration, the need to add or remove beneficiaries, changes in asset composition, or the appointment of a new trustee who must be authorized by the court. When private amendment is not available, a petition offers a formal remedy that can secure legal authority for necessary changes and provide finality for all concerned parties.
Filing a petition may also be appropriate when the settlor’s health or capacity is in question, when creditor claims must be addressed, or when modifications could affect tax or retirement planning. The petition process helps identify and resolve competing interests under judicial supervision, which reduces ambiguity and protects fiduciaries from later claims. If family dynamics or disputes threaten the orderly administration of the trust, seeking court approval can be a responsible step to preserve assets and implement an enforceable plan for distribution and management in accordance with the settlor’s objectives.
Common circumstances include changes in family structure such as marriage, divorce, births, or deaths that make the existing distribution scheme inappropriate. Other triggers are discovery of omitted assets, drafting errors that contradict the settlor’s intent, or the need to replace an incapacitated or deceased trustee. Financial developments like tax law changes or complex assets that require special handling can also prompt a petition. Additionally, disputes among beneficiaries that cannot be resolved privately often necessitate court involvement to clarify rights and authorize appropriate adjustments to the trust.
Shifts in family circumstances, including divorce, remarriage, deaths, or the birth of grandchildren, often require revisiting trust provisions to ensure that distributions reflect the settlor’s current intentions. Beneficiary needs may change over time, and a static trust document might not adequately address new realities. When these changes cannot be addressed through a simple amendment or agreement among interested persons, a court petition can authorize updates that align the trust with present-day family dynamics while protecting the rights and expectations of all beneficiaries.
Drafting mistakes, omitted provisions, or ambiguous phrasing in a trust can create confusion and hinder administration. When ambiguity prevents trustees from following the trust’s terms or when a gap leaves vital decisions unresolved, a petition can seek judicial interpretation or correction. The court examines available evidence, including the trust document, contemporaneous drafting notes, and relevant communications, to determine the settlor’s likely intent. A judicial order resolving ambiguities reduces the chance of future disputes and helps trustees administer the trust consistently.
If a trustee becomes unable to serve, refuses to act, or engages in conduct that puts trust assets at risk, a petition can request removal and appointment of a successor trustee or other remedial action. Courts evaluate whether the trustee’s conduct or incapacity justifies intervention and may order replacement, accounting, or other relief to protect beneficiaries. A formal court proceeding ensures that any transition of fiduciary responsibility is properly documented and legally sound, shielding beneficiaries and successor trustees from future challenges related to administration or authority.
Although our office is based in San Jose, the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman regularly assists clients throughout Sonoma County with trust modification petitions and related estate planning concerns. We can help evaluate whether a private amendment, settlement, or court petition is the most appropriate path, prepare required documents, coordinate notice to interested persons, and represent clients in hearings when necessary. Our focus is on practical solutions that honor the settlor’s intentions while protecting beneficiaries and trustees during the process of updating trust arrangements.
Clients turn to the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman for careful legal analysis, thorough preparation of court filings, and attentive communication through each stage of a trust petition. We emphasize clarity and responsiveness to help families understand options, timelines, and likely outcomes. Our team works to present persuasive petitions and to negotiate resolutions when possible, aiming to reduce confrontation and preserve family relationships while achieving legally sound results. We provide practical guidance tailored to each client’s situation and the specific requirements of California probate courts.
When litigation is necessary, we prepare detailed supporting declarations, gather relevant documents, and present a coherent legal case that highlights the settlor’s intent and the rationale for modification. We prioritize transparent communication with beneficiaries, trustees, and other interested persons to facilitate settlement where feasible. Our approach balances assertive representation with a goal of minimizing cost and delay. Whether pursuing a court petition or negotiating a private resolution, we focus on delivering results that protect assets and create a clear plan for administration going forward.
We assist clients at each step, from initial assessment and assembling documentation to filing the petition, handling service and notice requirements, and representing clients at hearings. Our aim is to reduce uncertainty and guide families through the judicial process with practical advice and steady support. For Sonoma County matters, we bring experience with local probate procedures and a commitment to securing durable outcomes that reflect the settlor’s objectives and the best interests of beneficiaries while addressing any disputes efficiently and professionally.
Our process begins with an initial consultation to review the trust, assess the reasons for modification, and identify interested persons. We then compile all necessary documentation, draft the petition and supporting declarations, and ensure compliance with notice and service rules. If negotiation or mediation is possible, we pursue settlement while preparing for court. For contested matters, we file the petition, respond to objections, and present the matter at a hearing. Throughout, we keep clients informed about timelines, potential outcomes, and practical steps to protect trust assets and carry out the settlor’s intentions.
The first step is a comprehensive assessment of the trust and the circumstances that prompt a modification. We request the trust instrument, any amendments, related estate planning documents, and records of asset ownership. We also identify interested persons and gather evidence supporting the need for modification, such as correspondence or medical records when capacity is at issue. This preparation forms the factual foundation for the petition and allows us to anticipate potential objections, craft persuasive declarations, and develop a strategy tailored to the client’s goals and the trust’s provisions.
A careful review of the trust document and related materials reveals the settlor’s intent, amendment provisions, and any drafting issues. We examine prior amendments, pour-over wills, powers of attorney, and financial records to understand the full estate plan context. This step also includes determining whether assets are properly titled to the trust and identifying any discrepancies that could affect the proposed modification. Accurate analysis at this stage reduces the risk of surprises and helps formulate the strongest possible factual and legal presentation for the court or settlement discussions.
Identifying all interested persons—beneficiaries, trustees, and others with potential claims—is essential to satisfy California notice rules. We prepare and serve required notices and maintain proof of service to avoid procedural defects. Early communication can often facilitate settlement or clarify objections. When notice reveals disputes, we assess their merits and adjust strategy accordingly. Proper notice safeguards the process and ensures the court will consider the petition without delay from procedural challenges, improving the chances of achieving a durable, enforceable modification.
After gathering documents and identifying interested persons, we prepare the petition, declarations, and supporting exhibits that set out the requested modification and its legal basis. Drafting focuses on presenting clear factual evidence, articulating the settlor’s intent, and explaining why court approval is warranted under California law. We file the petition with the appropriate probate court, arrange for service on interested persons, and track responses. Filing formalizes the request and begins the court’s review process, setting deadlines for objections and scheduling hearings if resolution is not achieved through negotiation.
Supporting declarations from trustees, beneficiaries, or witnesses provide factual details that help the court assess the petition. These statements document the history of the trust, the need for modification, and any communications that demonstrate the settlor’s intent. Clear, well-organized exhibits such as copies of the trust instrument, amendments, and asset records strengthen the petition. Attention to evidentiary detail increases the court’s confidence in granting the requested relief and narrows the scope of disputes that might require extended hearings.
Once the petition and supporting documents are ready, we file them with the probate court that has jurisdiction over the trust. We ensure that all notice and service requirements are met, prepare proof of service, and monitor the court calendar for responses or hearing dates. Timely and accurate filing reduces procedural risks and positions the case for efficient resolution. If objections arise, we promptly address them through responses or negotiation while keeping the client informed about possible outcomes and next steps in the litigation or settlement process.
After filing, the case may resolve through negotiated settlement, mediation, or a contested hearing before the court. We pursue settlement whenever appropriate to reduce cost and preserve relationships, while preparing for trial-like hearings if necessary. In court, we present evidence and argument showing why the modification should be approved, and we respond to objections on procedural and substantive grounds. Following resolution, the court issues an order reflecting the modified terms, which becomes part of the public record and guides future trust administration by trustees and beneficiaries.
Mediation can be an effective way to resolve disputes without a contested hearing, allowing parties to explore creative solutions and preserve relationships. We prepare settlement proposals, facilitate discussions, and document agreements so they can be presented to the court for approval if necessary. Documented settlements can expedite resolution and reduce legal fees compared with full litigation. When mediation succeeds, we ensure the resulting modifications are properly reflected in court orders or in nonjudicial agreements that comply with legal requirements and protect the parties’ interests going forward.
If the matter proceeds to a hearing, we present evidence and oral argument to show why the court should grant the requested modification. Judges consider the settlor’s intent, the merits of objections, and statutory standards when issuing an order. A clear presentation of facts and legal authority increases the likelihood of a favorable ruling. Once the court issues a final order, it becomes the authoritative document governing the trust’s modified terms, providing trustees and beneficiaries with legal clarity and reducing the prospect of further litigation regarding the same issues.
A trust modification petition is a formal request to a probate court asking permission to change the terms of an existing trust when private amendment is impractical or contested. Petitioners outline the proposed revisions, provide supporting declarations and documentary evidence, and request a judicial order authorizing the modification. Typical reasons for filing include correcting drafting errors, clarifying ambiguous language, replacing unavailable trustees, or addressing changed family or financial circumstances that the original trust did not anticipate. The court reviews the petition, ensures interested persons receive notice, and may hold a hearing to consider objections and evidence. If the court finds the proposed change consistent with applicable law and the settlor’s intent, it will issue an order adopting the modification. The result is an enforceable change that trustees can rely on when administering the trust.
The timeline for a trust modification petition varies with complexity, notice requirements, and whether the matter is contested. Simple petitions with cooperative interested persons and clear documentation can be resolved in a matter of weeks to a few months, particularly if no objections are filed. When parties reach agreement early, courts can often approve modifications more quickly and with minimal hearings. Contested petitions typically take longer due to the need for responses, potential discovery, and scheduled hearings. Complex factual disputes, multiple beneficiaries, or issues requiring expert testimony can extend the timeline to several months or longer. Early preparation and thoughtful notice can help keep the process as efficient as possible.
California probate rules require that interested persons receive notice of a petition affecting a trust. Interested persons generally include current beneficiaries, trustees, and others who have a legal or financial stake in the trust’s administration or distributions. Proper identification and service are important to avoid procedural defects that could delay the petition or give rise to objections. Notice procedures depend on the case and may include mailed notices, personal service, or publication in limited circumstances. Timely and verified service ensures parties have the opportunity to respond or negotiate, which can lead to settlement and reduce the need for contested hearings. Proof of service is filed with the court to document compliance with these requirements.
Yes, a trust can often be modified after the settlor dies through a court petition, particularly when the trust’s terms are ambiguous, when unforeseen circumstances arise, or when administration problems occur. California law provides mechanisms for postmortem modifications when the trust instrument or practical issues require court oversight. The petition should present evidence of the settlor’s intent and explain why the court’s intervention is necessary to effect the change. When filing a postmortem petition, it is important to provide relevant documents, declarations from interested persons, and any evidence that supports the requested modification. The court will evaluate whether the change preserves the settlor’s likely intentions and whether it is equitable to beneficiaries before granting an order that will govern administration going forward.
Courts consider several types of evidence in trust modification petitions, including the original trust document, amendments, contemporaneous drafting notes, correspondence that reflects the settlor’s intent, and declarations from trustees or witnesses. When capacity or undue influence is at issue, medical records and witness testimony may be relevant. Clear, organized exhibits and credible declarations strengthen the petition by providing factual support for the requested changes. In addition to documentary evidence, the court may consider applicable statutes and prior case law that guide modification standards. Demonstrating that the proposed change aligns with the settlor’s intent and does not unfairly prejudice beneficiaries increases the likelihood of a favorable decision and reduces the chance of successful objections.
Yes, alternatives to filing a court petition include private amendments while the settlor is alive, nonjudicial settlement agreements signed by all interested persons, and mediation to resolve disputes before seeking judicial relief. When the trust permits amendments by the settlor or when all parties agree, private solutions can be faster, less expensive, and more confidential than court proceedings. However, private alternatives require unanimous consent in many cases and may not be available when parties disagree, the settlor is unavailable, or statutory protections are needed. When private resolution is not feasible or when important legal issues must be settled, a formal court petition provides enforceable relief and a public record of the modification.
Costs for filing a trust modification petition vary based on the scope of legal work, court filing fees, service costs, and whether the matter is contested. Uncontested petitions with clear documentation and cooperative interested persons generally cost less because they require fewer court appearances and less drafting. Contested matters typically incur higher fees due to additional filings, discovery, and hearings required to resolve disputes. Estimating total cost requires a case-by-case assessment of document preparation, the need for investigation or witness declarations, and the likely duration of court involvement. Early consultation and careful planning can help manage costs by clarifying goals, identifying practical settlement opportunities, and streamlining the petition process where possible.
Yes, when a petition is filed in probate court, related filings and court orders generally become part of the public record. This means the details of the petition, supporting documents, and the court’s rulings may be accessible to the public through court records. Parties seeking privacy may attempt to limit public exposure by resolving matters privately or by requesting redactions where permitted, but courts balance privacy interests with the public nature of probate proceedings. If confidentiality is a primary concern, consider whether a nonjudicial settlement agreement or private amendment is possible. When court involvement is unavoidable, counsel can advise on what information may be subject to public disclosure and how to protect sensitive details to the extent allowed by law.
Yes, beneficiaries and other interested persons have the right to object to a proposed modification by filing a written response with the court and presenting evidence at a hearing. Objections may assert that the modification contradicts the settlor’s intent, harms beneficiaries, or fails to comply with statutory requirements. The court will consider objections and weigh competing evidence before deciding whether to approve the requested changes. Responding to objections often involves negotiation, additional declarations, or legal briefing to address concerns. Courts appreciate efforts to resolve disputes through settlement or mediation, and an objection that is resolved by agreement can streamline the process and result in an order that reflects the parties’ compromise.
To prepare for filing a petition in Sonoma County, start by locating the trust instrument and any amendments, wills, powers of attorney, and asset records. Compile documentation supporting the reasons for modification, identify and contact interested persons, and keep records of communications. An organized file with clear copies of relevant documents and a timeline of events strengthens the petition and expedites the court’s review. Additionally, be ready to provide declarations from trustees or witnesses who can attest to the trust’s history and the need for change. Early consultation with counsel familiar with local probate procedures helps ensure that notice requirements are met, filing forms are completed correctly, and the process proceeds as efficiently as possible.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas