If you are considering changes to an existing trust in Temelec or elsewhere in Sonoma County, a trust modification petition can provide a clear legal path to update trust terms, correct drafting errors, or address changed circumstances. At the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman, we help clients understand when a petition is appropriate and what steps are involved. This overview explains the legal basis for modification petitions, the common reasons petitioners pursue them, and how local courts typically handle requests to modify revocable or irrevocable trusts in California jurisdictions like Temelec.
Trust modification petitions often arise when family situations, financial conditions, or intent expressed by a trustmaker evolve over time. Whether a trust needs to be clarified to reflect the trustmaker’s current wishes, updated to respond to tax or asset changes, or corrected where language creates ambiguity, a petition can formalize the needed change and protect beneficiaries’ interests. This page describes how the petition process works in Sonoma County and why careful preparation, accurate documentation, and clear explanations to the court matter when seeking modifications to a trust.
Filing a trust modification petition can prevent disputes, reduce administrative burdens, and ensure the trust reflects the trustmaker’s present intentions. Successful petitions clarify ambiguous terms, address changes in beneficiaries’ circumstances, or correct mistakes that could otherwise cause litigation later. For trustees and beneficiaries, securing a judicial order approving the modification provides certainty and legal protection when carrying out distributions, managing assets, or restructuring trust provisions. Understanding the procedural and evidentiary requirements helps petitioners present a persuasive case and avoid delays that could affect estate administration.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman serves clients across Sonoma County and the surrounding Bay Area with a steady focus on estate planning and trust matters. Our practice handles a broad range of trust-related petitions, including modifications, corrections, and conservatorship-linked issues. We approach each matter with careful factual review, clear legal reasoning, and practical guidance tailored to local court procedures. Clients who choose our firm expect thorough preparation of filings, thoughtful negotiation with interested parties when appropriate, and consistent communication through each stage of the petition process.
A trust modification petition is a formal request to a probate or superior court asking for approval to alter the terms of an existing trust. Modifications may be requested for revocable trusts when the trustmaker is alive and capable, or in some circumstances for irrevocable trusts when permitted by statute or when all interested parties consent. The petition must explain the legal grounds for modification, describe the proposed changes, and include supporting evidence such as declarations or trust documents. Local California procedures require specific forms, notice to beneficiaries, and careful adherence to filing rules in Sonoma County courts.
Before filing, it is important to evaluate whether informal steps, such as a successor trustee’s administrative actions or a signed amendment, could resolve the issue without court intervention. When court approval is necessary, the petition should be drafted to minimize disputes and clearly articulate the necessity or benefit of the requested change. The process commonly involves serving notice on beneficiaries, responding to potential objections, and presenting evidence that the modification serves the trust’s purpose or addresses error, ambiguity, or changed circumstances that justify judicial relief.
A trust modification petition asks the court to formally permit changes to the language, administration, or distribution terms of a trust. Reasons for requesting modification include correcting scrivener’s errors, clarifying vague provisions, adapting to a beneficiary’s changed needs, or updating terms to reflect tax law changes. The petition lays out a factual and legal basis for the change, provides the proposed revised language or order, and explains how the modification preserves the trustmaker’s intent. Courts evaluate petitions based on statutory authority, consent of interested parties, and evidence supporting the proposed adjustment.
Successful trust modification petitions typically include a clear statement of the existing language at issue, the proposed modification, declarations from relevant parties, and any documents showing the trustmaker’s intent. Notices to beneficiaries and other interested parties are required to ensure due process, and courts may schedule hearings to consider objections. In Sonoma County, adhering to local rules and properly serving all interested persons can expedite review. The court may grant the requested change, deny it, or fashion a narrower remedy that addresses the underlying concern while preserving other trust provisions.
Understanding common terms used in trust modification petitions helps petitioners and beneficiaries follow the process. Definitions for terms like trustmaker, trustee, beneficiary, modification, amendment, recission, and petition provide clarity. Knowing what constitutes sufficient evidence, what notice requirements apply, and the difference between revocable and irrevocable trust modifications can shape strategy. This glossary section explains the words and concepts most often encountered in petitions and court orders, helping readers grasp procedural steps and legal standards used in Sonoma County and California probate courts.
The trustmaker, also known as the settlor or grantor, is the person who created the trust and set its original terms. In petitions to modify a trust, the trustmaker’s current intent, capacity, and any contemporaneous writings are often central to the court’s decision. If the trustmaker is alive and competent, amendments may be made without court involvement in many cases. When the trustmaker is deceased or incapacitated, petitions to modify usually require court review and notice to beneficiaries, and may rely on evidence such as prior drafts, correspondence, or testimony regarding the trustmaker’s intent.
A trust amendment is typically a formal change executed under the trust’s amendment provisions while the trustmaker is able to act, whereas a trust modification often refers to court-ordered changes made after issues arise or when the trustmaker cannot or did not amend the trust directly. A modification petition asks the court to approve changes due to mistake, ambiguity, changed circumstances, or other reasons recognized under California law. The distinction affects what evidence and procedural steps are needed, and may influence whether beneficiary consent is sufficient or whether judicial intervention is required.
An interested person includes beneficiaries, trustees, conservators, and others with a potential legal or financial stake in the trust’s administration or outcome of a petition. California probate rules require notice to interested persons so they can object or appear at hearings. Identifying and properly serving all interested persons is a critical step in the petition process; failure to provide adequate notice can result in delays or the court setting aside an order. Notices must include sufficient information about the petition so recipients can make informed decisions about joining, objecting, or seeking modifications.
Judicial reformation or correction allows a court to rewrite or clarify trust provisions when a drafting mistake, ambiguous language, or conflicting documents obscure the trustmaker’s intent. Petitions invoking reformation present evidence showing the true intent and the nature of the error. Courts consider statutory standards and supporting declarations when deciding whether to reform terms. Orders that correct mistakes help trustees administer the trust according to the trustmaker’s intent and reduce the likelihood of subsequent disputes or misinterpretation during asset distribution and management.
When addressing needed changes to a trust, options range from direct amendments by the trustmaker to court petitions for modification or reformation. Informal solutions may work when all parties agree and the trustmaker can sign a valid amendment. However, when the trustmaker cannot act, or parties disagree about interpretation or correction of an error, a court petition provides finality. Choosing the right path involves assessing the trustmaker’s capacity, the scope of change, the likelihood of beneficiary opposition, and whether court approval will better protect the interests and prevent future disputes.
A limited, informal approach can be adequate when the trust’s amendment provisions allow the trustmaker to change terms and all relevant parties agree to the update. If the language needing change is minor, such as an administrative detail or a naming correction, and the trustmaker is available to sign an amendment, the parties can avoid court involvement. Agreement among beneficiaries and a documented amendment can streamline administration, reduce cost, and preserve family relationships, provided the amendment complies with the trust’s formalities and California requirements for valid modifications.
Sometimes changes represent straightforward administrative corrections, like updating a trustee’s contact information or clarifying a distribution timing that is not contested. In these situations, trustees can often address the matter through proper recordkeeping, written acknowledgments, or an amendment signed by the trustmaker. Avoiding court lets parties save time and expense, but careful documentation is still essential to prevent later disputes. Trustees should ensure any informal change is consistent with trust terms and is clearly recorded in trust administration files.
Comprehensive legal action is often warranted when beneficiaries disagree about the meaning of trust provisions or when multiple versions of documents exist that suggest different intent. In such cases, a petition to the court can resolve conflicting interpretations, allow admission of evidence like drafts or correspondence, and produce a binding court order that clarifies administration. Seeking judicial resolution helps avoid prolonged informal disputes that could harm relationships and impede asset management, and it creates an authoritative record that trustees can rely on when distributing trust property.
When the trustmaker is incapacitated or deceased, and significant assets, third-party claims, or tax considerations are involved, a formal petition may be appropriate to ensure changes are legally enforceable. Court involvement can address disputes over capacity, protect the rights of creditors and beneficiaries, and provide instructions for complex administration tasks such as transferring retirement accounts, handling real property, or resolving competing claims. A court-approved modification reduces the risk of future litigation and provides a clear path for trustees to manage and distribute assets in accordance with the order.
A comprehensive approach that seeks judicial approval for a trust modification offers several benefits, including legal finality, protection for trustees against future claims, and clarity for beneficiaries. A court order resolving ambiguity or correcting a mistake reduces the chance of subsequent contests and helps trustees act with confidence when managing trust assets. By presenting thorough documentation and a reasoned legal argument, petitioners can secure an outcome that aligns with the trustmaker’s intent while documenting the rationale for the change in an official record.
Pursuing a judicial remedy also helps preserve family relationships by preventing ongoing uncertainty and reducing the potential for disputes to escalate. The process of providing notice, allowing objections, and holding hearings ensures transparency and gives all interested persons an opportunity to be heard. While litigation can be more time-consuming than informal amendments, the protections afforded by a court order can outweigh the costs when the modifications affect significant assets, complex distributions, or long-term management of trust property.
When a court approves a trust modification, the order creates legal finality that protects trustees and beneficiaries. Trustees who act pursuant to a judicially approved modification are less likely to face successful future challenges, and beneficiaries receive a clear directive on how the trust should be administered. This protection matters when trustees must transfer property, sell assets, or make distributions that might otherwise prompt disputes. A documented court decision helps ensure that trust administration proceeds smoothly and in a manner consistent with the court’s ruling.
Court-ordered modifications provide durable clarity that guides long-term trust administration and reduces ambiguity for successor trustees. When a modification addresses confusing terms or adjusts distributions to reflect new circumstances, the resulting order helps subsequent trustees understand their obligations and the trust’s goals. This clarity is especially valuable when trusts hold diverse assets, when beneficiaries’ needs may change over years, or when retirement and tax planning considerations require precise instructions to avoid unintended consequences.
Compile all relevant trust documents, drafts, correspondence, and any records showing the trustmaker’s intent before preparing a petition. Clear documentation—such as previous drafts, letters, or contemporaneous notes—can illustrate why a modification is appropriate and help the court understand the factual background. Additionally, assemble financial statements and asset inventories that show how the change will impact administration. Strong documentary support reduces ambiguity, helps identify interested persons, and strengthens the presentation to the court when seeking modification or clarification.
When drafting the petition, describe the trustmaker’s intent and how the requested modification achieves that goal. Presenting the practical impact of the change on beneficiaries and administration helps the court weigh the request and limits the likelihood of objections based on misunderstanding. Discuss expected effects on distribution timing, tax consequences, and any measures to protect minor or special needs beneficiaries. A petition that frames the modification in terms of reasonable administration and alignment with the trustmaker’s wishes is more likely to receive favorable consideration.
People pursue trust modification petitions for many reasons, including correcting drafting errors, resolving ambiguous provisions, updating outdated terms, and addressing changes in family dynamics or finances. When an informal amendment is not possible because the trustmaker is incapacitated or a provision is disputed, the court can step in to authorize changes that reflect the trustmaker’s intent. Petitioners commonly seek relief to facilitate distributions, protect vulnerable beneficiaries, or resolve conflicts that hinder administration and could otherwise lead to prolonged litigation without a clear resolution.
Other triggers for petitions include unexpected tax implications, the need to restructure distributions to preserve government benefits for a beneficiary, or to correct issues related to retirement accounts and titles to real property. Filing a petition can also be appropriate when trustees encounter legal roadblocks that prevent them from fulfilling trustee duties. Carefully evaluating these factors early and seeking a formal order when necessary can save time and prevent costly disputes that arise from acting on uncertain authority.
Typical circumstances include ambiguous language that leaves a trustee unsure how to distribute assets, multiple conflicting versions of trust documents, or provisions that overlook a beneficiary’s changed needs. Other reasons include misdescribed assets, clerical errors, or situations where the trustmaker intended a different outcome than the written trust reflects. When such circumstances arise, interested persons or trustees may petition the court for guidance or correction to ensure the trust is administered in a way consistent with the trustmaker’s goals while safeguarding beneficiaries’ rights.
Ambiguity in language about who receives income or principal often creates uncertainty for trustees and beneficiaries. For example, a provision that does not specify distribution timing or conditions can stall administration and lead to disputes. A petition can ask the court to interpret ambiguous terms or reform the trust to reflect the intended distribution plan. By seeking judicial clarification, trustees can avoid making distribution decisions that might later be contested and ensure assets are handled according to a court-approved interpretation.
Clerical errors, incorrect beneficiary names, or omissions of key provisions can undermine a trust’s operation. When a mistake is evident from surrounding circumstances, a petition to correct or reform the trust can align the document with the trustmaker’s intent. Courts review evidence such as drafts, contemporaneous notes, and witness declarations to determine whether a correction is warranted. Correcting mistakes through a court order helps trustees manage assets without risking later challenges based on the original error.
Significant life changes such as divorce, birth, disability, or a beneficiary’s need for long-term care can make original trust terms unworkable or unfair. When beneficiaries’ circumstances change substantially, a modification petition can restructure distributions, protect eligibility for government benefits, or adjust management provisions. Courts consider whether the modification aligns with the trustmaker’s overall objectives and whether the change reasonably addresses evolving needs, helping ensure the trust continues to serve its intended purpose over time.
Residents of Temelec and surrounding communities in Sonoma County can turn to the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman for guidance on trust modification petitions and related estate planning matters. We offer practical assistance in preparing petitions, assembling evidence, and complying with local court rules. Our approach emphasizes transparent communication, careful attention to procedural requirements, and support for trustees and beneficiaries as they navigate notice, hearings, and potential objections. Call our office to discuss how a petition might resolve a particular trust issue.
Clients turn to the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman for dependable legal representation in trust modification matters because the firm focuses on clear legal strategy and practical results. We prioritize thorough preparation of petitions, careful review of trust documents, and meticulous compliance with Sonoma County probate procedures. Our goal is to minimize delays and present a persuasive case that aligns with the trustmaker’s intentions and the best interests of beneficiaries, helping trustees act with confidence and legal protection.
When disputes arise or legal complexity increases, having a firm that understands local court practices and probate requirements can influence outcomes and reduce uncertainty. We assist with drafting declarations, assembling documentary support, and communicating with interested persons to resolve objections when possible. Our focus on planning and advance preparation helps clients pursue petitions that deliver clarity and durable solutions for trust administration, protecting family relationships and facilitating orderly distribution of trust assets.
In addition to petition representation, our firm provides coordinated estate planning services—such as drafting revocable living trusts, pour-over wills, powers of attorney, and health care directives—that work together with any petition outcome to help clients maintain up-to-date plans. This integrated approach supports long-term administration and helps prevent problems that could lead to future petitions. We welcome inquiries from Temelec residents seeking to address current trust issues or to update their estate plans to reduce future complications.
Our process begins with an in-depth review of the trust documents and the circumstances prompting the modification request. We identify interested persons, gather supporting evidence, and recommend the most efficient path—whether that is an informal amendment, negotiated resolution, or a court petition. If a petition is required, we prepare the necessary filings, serve notices to beneficiaries, and represent clients at hearings. Throughout, we keep clients informed of deadlines, potential issues, and likely outcomes under Sonoma County probate procedures.
The first step involves a thorough review of the trust instrument, related documents, and factual evidence that support the requested change. We evaluate whether a modification or correction is needed, confirm who must receive notice, and outline expected courtroom procedures. This strategic review also considers alternatives to litigation, potential objections from beneficiaries, and the best way to frame the petition to reflect the trustmaker’s intent while addressing administration concerns in Sonoma County probate courts.
We gather drafts of the trust, correspondence, financial records, and any declarations that shed light on the trustmaker’s intentions. Identifying contemporaneous writings or communications that support a correction or modification is often decisive in court. Properly organized evidence helps the court understand the basis for relief and can reduce the scope of contested issues. This document collection phase also includes verifying asset titles and beneficiary designations to assess how a potential order will affect administration.
Determining who qualifies as an interested person under California probate law is essential for proper notice. We prepare notices that explain the nature of the petition and the proposed changes, and we ensure service meets local rules and timelines. Proper notice preserves the court’s authority to act and gives beneficiaries an opportunity to object or participate. Clear and complete notice practices reduce the likelihood of procedural challenges that could delay or unsettle a court-approved modification.
After gathering documents and identifying interested persons, we draft the petition and supporting declarations to present a persuasive, well-supported case to the court. The petition explains the factual basis for the requested modification, quotes the relevant trust language, and proposes the specific revision or relief sought. Filing with the appropriate Sonoma County probate division triggers the formal process, including court scheduling, required publishing or mailing notices, and providing interested persons with information needed to respond or appear at hearings.
Clear drafting is vital to help the court understand why modification is appropriate and how the proposed change aligns with the trustmaker’s intent. Petitions include declarations from trustees or other witnesses, citations to legal standards when relevant, and a proposed order reflecting the precise relief requested. Carefully prepared declarations provide the narrative and facts that support the legal argument, allowing the court to evaluate the request without unnecessary ambiguity or confusion.
After filing the petition, administrative steps include paying fees, scheduling hearings, and ensuring all procedural requirements are satisfied. The court may require additional documentation or impose briefing schedules for contested matters. We monitor deadlines, respond to requests from the court, and coordinate service on interested persons. Timely and thorough attention to these administrative details helps keep the matter moving and positions the petition for efficient judicial consideration in Sonoma County.
The court may hold a hearing where interested persons can object or present supporting evidence. At the hearing, the judge considers declarations, documentary evidence, and applicable law before issuing an order. The court’s decision may grant the requested modification, deny it, or fashion a different remedy that addresses concerns raised during the proceeding. Once an order is entered, trustees use it as authority to administer trust assets in accordance with the court’s directions, reducing uncertainty and protecting beneficiaries’ interests.
Preparation for hearings includes organizing exhibits, preparing witness declarations, and anticipating common objections. We help clients frame testimony and evidence that clarify the trustmaker’s intent and the reasons for the requested modification. When objections arise, we work to resolve them through negotiation where possible or to address them at hearing through legal argument and persuasive evidence. Solid preparation increases the likelihood the court will accept the petition or provide tailored relief that meets the needs of interested parties.
Once the court issues an order, trustees must implement the modification by updating trust records, transferring or retitling assets as required, and notifying beneficiaries of the changed terms. We assist with follow-up actions to ensure compliance with the order and to complete any administrative tasks necessary for distribution or management. Proper implementation reduces the chance of further disputes and helps ensure that the trust functions as intended under the court’s direction.
A trust amendment is usually a change made directly by the trustmaker under the trust’s amendment provisions while the trustmaker is capable of acting, and it typically does not involve the court. A trust modification petition, by contrast, is a request filed with the court asking for judicial authority to change trust terms when an amendment is not available or when a dispute or mistake must be resolved. Modifications may be sought to correct errors, clarify ambiguous wording, or address changed circumstances that the original trust did not contemplate. Both processes aim to align the trust with the trustmaker’s intent, but they follow different procedures. An amendment executed by the trustmaker can be faster and less costly if the trustmaker is available and all formalities are met. When the trustmaker cannot act or parties disagree about interpretation or correction, a petition provides a binding resolution through the court, including notice to interested persons and the opportunity for hearings if objections arise.
A court petition is typically required when the trustmaker is incapacitated or deceased and no valid amendment can be executed, when there is a dispute about the trust’s terms, or when the trust instrument contains errors or ambiguities that cannot be resolved informally. Petitioning the court is also appropriate where the modification involves significant assets or impacts beneficiaries’ rights in ways that require judicial oversight. California statutes and local probate rules guide when judicial intervention is necessary and what proof is required to justify modification. Courts look for evidence that the requested change aligns with the trustmaker’s intent or corrects an identifiable mistake. Notice to interested persons is mandatory so beneficiaries have an opportunity to object. When all interested persons consent in writing, a petition may be easier to resolve, but court involvement may still be required to create an enforceable order that protects trustees and beneficiaries over the long term.
The timeline for a trust modification petition varies based on complexity, the number of interested persons, and whether objections are filed. Simple petitions with full agreement among interested parties can be resolved more quickly, often within several months, whereas contested matters can take longer due to briefing deadlines, hearings, and potential appeals. Court calendars in Sonoma County and the need for supplemental documentation or evidence also affect timing. Preparing a thorough petition and timely serving notices helps avoid procedural delays. Delays may also arise if the court requests additional evidence, schedules multiple hearings, or if parties seek continuances to negotiate. Working proactively to identify interested persons, gather supporting documents, and anticipate likely objections can speed the process. After a court issues an order, the implementation of the modification—such as retitling assets—can involve additional administrative time depending on the asset types involved.
Yes, beneficiaries and other interested persons have the right to object to a proposed trust modification. Courts require notice to these individuals so they can review the petition and raise concerns if they believe the change is inappropriate, conflicts with the trustmaker’s intent, or unfairly prejudices their interests. Objections trigger opportunities for hearings where parties present evidence and legal arguments. The possibility of objections is why thorough notice and solid documentary support are essential components of a well-prepared petition. When objections are raised, resolution may occur through negotiation, mediation, or court hearings. Courts weigh the evidence and statutory standards before making a decision, and sometimes fashion narrower remedies to address legitimate concerns while preserving the trustmaker’s overall intent. Promptly addressing objections and exploring settlement options can reduce litigation costs and help achieve outcomes acceptable to multiple parties.
Courts consider documentary evidence such as drafts of the trust, correspondence, declarations from witnesses, and any contemporaneous writings that reflect the trustmaker’s intent. Financial documents, asset inventories, and records showing the practical impact of the proposed modification may also be relevant. Where mistakes are alleged, courts evaluate whether the surrounding facts demonstrate that the written trust does not reflect what the trustmaker intended at the time of execution. Declarations from trustees, family members, or others with direct knowledge can clarify intent and substantiate claims of error or ambiguity. The quality and consistency of supporting evidence matter; clear, objective documentation is more persuasive than unsupported assertions. Courts also ensure that notice and procedural requirements are met before granting relief, so evidentiary gaps or service defects can hinder the petition.
A court-ordered modification applies to the trust instrument the court has modified and can influence how related estate planning documents are interpreted or implemented. For instance, a modification that affects asset distributions may interact with beneficiary designations on insurance policies or retirement accounts. Trustees and fiduciaries should review related documents to ensure consistent administration after a modification order. Where conflicts arise, further legal steps may sometimes be needed to harmonize all planning documents with the court’s order. It is also wise for clients to review their entire estate plan after a modification is finalized to ensure other instruments such as wills, powers of attorney, and health directives remain aligned with current intentions. Updating or coordinating these documents can prevent future conflicts and reduce the likelihood of additional petitions to correct inconsistencies.
When the court approves a modification, the order provides trustees with clear judicial direction that can limit liability for actions taken in compliance with the order. Trustees acting under a court’s ruling have formal authority to implement the changes without fear that their actions will be successfully challenged later on the same grounds. This judicial protection is especially valuable when the modification affects significant distributions or complex asset transfers that might otherwise expose trustees to disputes. To maintain protection, trustees should follow the terms of the court’s order precisely, maintain accurate records of actions taken, and communicate steps taken to beneficiaries. If further administrative tasks are required—such as retitling property or coordinating with financial institutions—documenting compliance with the order helps ensure that trustee actions remain supported by the court’s directive.
Alternatives to filing a petition include pursuing an amendment while the trustmaker is capable, negotiating a settlement among interested persons, or using nonjudicial settlement agreements where permitted. When all interested parties agree, written agreements can sometimes resolve disputes without court involvement, although such agreements should be carefully documented to prevent future challenges. Trustees may also consider administrative actions consistent with trust terms when changes are minor and uncontested. However, alternatives may not be feasible if the trustmaker is incapacitated or deceased, if there are competing versions of documents, or if statutory requirements demand court approval. In contested situations or where parties seek a binding resolution that protects trustees against future claims, a judicial petition remains an important option to ensure enforceable, long-term clarity.
Costs to file a trust modification petition in Sonoma County depend on court filing fees, attorney fees, and any costs associated with serving notice to interested persons or obtaining third-party records. Court filing fees are set by local schedules and can vary depending on the petition type and requested relief. Attorney fees vary with the complexity of the matter and the time required to prepare documents, gather evidence, and represent parties at hearings. Obtaining an estimate early in the process helps clients plan and weigh alternatives. When parties are able to resolve issues informally or reach agreement before litigation, overall costs can be significantly lower. Conversely, contested matters with multiple hearings naturally increase expense. Throughout the process, we aim to provide transparent cost estimates and discuss alternative approaches that may economize resources while protecting clients’ interests.
Bring the original trust document and any drafts, amendments, or related correspondence that shed light on the trustmaker’s intent. Financial records, asset inventories, deeds, beneficiary designation forms, and any prior court documents related to the estate or trust are also helpful. If there are medical records or declarations regarding capacity, those may be relevant for certain petitions. A clear, organized set of documents streamlines the initial review and helps identify the most appropriate path forward. Also prepare a list of interested persons and their contact information, plus any known objections or disputes among beneficiaries. Being ready to discuss the history of the trust, the reasons for the requested change, and desired outcomes will make the first meeting productive. We will use this information to outline likely procedures, potential challenges, and realistic timelines for resolving the matter in Sonoma County courts.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas