A trust modification petition changes the terms of an existing trust when circumstances, law, or the trustmaker’s intentions have shifted since the trust was created. In Stanislaus County, including Bystrom, families often seek modifications to clarify distributions, update trustees, or address changed financial or family situations. The petition process can protect beneficiaries’ interests while ensuring the trust aligns with current goals. Whether the change is minor or substantial, a trust modification petition provides a formal court process to approve revisions and reduce future disputes. Our firm assists clients with clear guidance throughout each stage of this process.
Deciding to pursue a trust modification petition involves careful review of the original trust document, applicable California trust laws, and the reasons for change. Some modifications can be handled informally when all interested parties agree, while others require court approval because of ambiguity, objections, or statutory requirements. Practical issues like tax consequences, creditor rights, and beneficiary protections must be considered. The process is designed to balance the trustmaker’s intent with legal safeguards for beneficiaries, and thoughtful preparation is essential to avoid delays and unnecessary disputes. Our approach emphasizes clarity and documentation at every step.
Filing a trust modification petition can prevent long-term conflict and align the trust with the trustmaker’s current wishes and life changes, such as remarriage, new children, asset sales, or changes in health. A properly drafted petition clarifies beneficiary rights, updates trustee authorities, and addresses tax or creditor concerns, reducing the likelihood of costly litigation later. The court process provides formal recognition of changes, increasing enforceability and transparency among parties. Thoughtful modifications also help preserve estate planning objectives by adapting to evolving circumstances in a legally sound manner that beneficiaries can rely upon.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provides estate planning and trust administration services with practical guidance tailored to California law. Our team assists clients in evaluating whether a trust modification petition is appropriate and prepares petitions that anticipate common objections and procedural requirements. We work with local courts in Stanislaus County and neighboring jurisdictions to seek timely resolutions. The firm emphasizes clear communication, careful documentation, and client-centered planning to help families achieve durable solutions that reflect their current needs and protect beneficiaries’ interests over time.
A trust modification petition is a legal request filed in probate or superior court to alter specific terms of an existing trust when circumstances or uncertainties arise. The petition typically explains the factual basis for the change, cites applicable law, and proposes revised language or relief. California law provides pathways for court-ordered modifications when all interested parties consent, when modifications are necessary to carry out the trustmaker’s intent, or when unforeseen circumstances make the original terms impractical. The court evaluates whether proposed changes are consistent with the trust’s objectives and the rights of beneficiaries.
Not every requested change will be approved; the court considers the trust instrument, the trustmaker’s intent, potential harm to beneficiaries, and whether statutory conditions are met. Informal approaches may succeed if beneficiaries and trustees agree, but contested changes require litigation and evidentiary support. The process often involves reviewing financial records, prior estate planning documents, and communications that shed light on the trustmaker’s intent. Properly preparing a petition includes addressing notice requirements, possible objections, and alternative dispute resolution options such as mediation to reduce time and cost.
A trust modification petition asks the court to authorize changing the terms of a trust under specific legal grounds, which in California may include mistake, changed circumstances, or provisions in the trust allowing court intervention. Petitioners must explain why the modification is necessary or appropriate and how the change aligns with the trustmaker’s overall plan. Courts will look to preserve the trustmaker’s intent while resolving ambiguity or addressing impractical provisions. The petition should provide clear justification and legal citations, while offering proposed revised language that the court can adopt if it agrees to grant relief.
A complete petition outlines the parties involved, the original trust provisions at issue, the factual basis for modification, and the specific relief sought. Supporting documents often include the original trust, amendments, letters or declarations reflecting the trustmaker’s intent, and any relevant financial statements. The petition must satisfy notice and service obligations to beneficiaries and interested parties. Courts may require hearings, and opponents can file objections. Preparing for possible litigation means anticipating evidentiary needs, documenting communications, and proposing narrowly tailored changes that address the underlying problem while minimizing disruption to the trust structure.
Understanding common terms helps clients follow the petition process and participate in decisions. Definitions cover terms like settlor, trustee, beneficiary, amendment, revocation, and petition for modification. Each term relates to roles and actions within the trust’s lifecycle, and knowing their meanings clarifies who must be notified, who can bring a petition, and what court approval may accomplish. Reviewing these terms early in the process can reduce confusion, streamline communication among parties, and guide reasonable expectations about outcomes, timelines, and potential costs associated with seeking a trust modification in California courts.
The settlor, also known as the trustmaker, is the person who created the trust and whose intent governs its terms. A petition to modify a trust typically seeks to honor or adjust the settlor’s intentions when circumstances change. Courts focus on evidence of the settlor’s objectives, such as the trust document itself, prior amendments, and contemporaneous statements. If the settlor is still living, their statements or actions carry significant weight, but if they have passed away, the court relies on the written instrument and admissible evidence to discern the settlor’s original goals and whether a proposed change will align with them.
The trustee is the individual or institution responsible for managing trust assets and carrying out the terms of the trust according to its provisions and applicable law. Trustees have fiduciary duties to administer the trust in the best interests of beneficiaries, including duties of loyalty and prudence. When a petition to modify a trust is filed, trustees may be named as petitioners or respondents depending on their role and whether they support the change. The court evaluates trustee actions and proposed modifications to ensure they comply with the trust instrument and protect beneficiaries’ rights.
Beneficiaries are persons or entities entitled to receive benefits or distributions from the trust under its terms. Beneficiaries must be given proper notice of petition proceedings, and their responses or objections can shape the court’s decision. The court takes beneficiary interests seriously when considering modifications, ensuring that changes do not unjustly impair anticipated distributions or rights. In many cases, beneficiary agreement simplifies the process; contested matters require the court to weigh the settlor’s intent against any potential detriment to beneficiaries before granting relief.
An amendment is a direct written change made to a trust when the trust document allows such alterations by the settlor, often executed without court involvement. A modification petition, by contrast, seeks judicial approval to change trust terms when formal amendment is not possible, when the settlor’s intent is unclear, or when there are disputes among interested parties. Courts carefully distinguish between voluntary, settlor-executed amendments and court-ordered modifications, evaluating whether the proposed change respects the trustmaker’s established objectives while addressing legal or factual issues that prevent straightforward amendment.
Clients can consider several approaches to update a trust: a direct amendment by the trustmaker, a written agreement among beneficiaries and trustees, or a formal court petition for modification. Direct amendment is simplest when the trustmaker is competent and willing. A beneficiary agreement can resolve matters without court involvement if all interested parties consent and the change is lawful. However, when parties disagree, the trustmaker is unavailable, or legal complexities arise, a court petition ensures a binding resolution. Each path has procedural requirements and varying timelines, costs, and risks, so choosing the right option depends on the specifics of the situation.
If the trustmaker is available and capable, a direct amendment to the trust instrument can address many routine changes, such as updating named trustees, adjusting distribution instructions, or clarifying language. An amendment executed according to the trust’s requirements avoids court involvement and can be implemented quickly and economically. It is important to follow proper formalities and to record any related documents so trustees and beneficiaries understand the current terms. Proper execution and documentation help prevent future disputes and reduce the need for a judicial modification petition.
When all beneficiaries and the trustee agree on a change and the trust instrument allows such a consensual approach, a written agreement can be an efficient alternative to litigation. This path avoids the time and expense of court proceedings, but it requires thorough documentation and often legal review to ensure the agreement is enforceable and does not violate statutory protections. Even with unanimous consent, parties should consider tax, creditor, and long-term planning consequences before finalizing changes to ensure the agreement preserves intended estate planning outcomes.
A court petition becomes necessary when beneficiaries disagree about proposed changes or when the trustmaker is unavailable to amend the trust personally. In such cases, a judicial determination ensures that modifications are legally valid and enforceable. The court evaluates evidence of intent, the nature of the dispute, and whether the proposed alterations serve the trust’s objectives without unfairly disadvantaging beneficiaries. Filing a petition allows parties to resolve disputes under formal procedures, with the court balancing legal standards and equitable considerations to reach a binding resolution.
When proposed modifications involve tax consequences, substantial asset reallocation, creditor claims, or competing beneficiary interests, a court review provides the structure necessary to address these complexities. Petitioning the court enables judicial oversight of notice, valuation, and distribution adjustments while protecting the legal rights of all stakeholders. Complex cases often require formal discovery, evidence presentation, and judicial findings, so seeking careful legal guidance helps prepare a thorough petition, anticipate objections, and present the case clearly to the court for timely consideration.
A comprehensive approach to trust modification considers the legal, tax, and family implications of changes and aims to craft solutions that minimize future disputes. By preparing well-supported petitions, communicating proactively with beneficiaries, and addressing foreseeable objections, parties can achieve durable outcomes. Courts give greater weight to carefully framed requests that demonstrate respect for the trustmaker’s intent and beneficiary protections. Comprehensive planning also reduces the risk of unintended consequences, such as triggering tax liabilities or unintentionally disinheriting parties, by incorporating holistic analysis into the proposed modifications.
Taking a long-term view helps ensure changes serve the trust’s original goals while adapting to new circumstances. This includes evaluating asset titling, successor trustee provisions, distributions, and creditor exposure, and making adjustments that preserve flexibility without sacrificing legal clarity. Open communication with interested parties and early identification of potential disputes can lead to negotiated resolutions or streamlined court proceedings. Overall, a comprehensive strategy reduces friction, protects beneficiary interests, and produces a clearer, more enforceable trust document for the future.
When modifications are supported by thorough documentation and clear legal grounds, courts are more likely to approve changes without protracted litigation. Preparing a detailed petition with supporting evidence and proposed language limits ambiguity and streamlines judicial review. Clear outcomes reduce the chance of subsequent disputes by beneficiaries who might otherwise challenge ill-defined or sudden changes. By anticipating common objections and addressing statutory requirements up front, the process moves more predictably and efficiently toward a final court order that beneficiaries and trustees can rely on.
A comprehensive modification balances fidelity to the trustmaker’s original purposes with necessary adjustments for changed circumstances. The goal is to implement changes that preserve the trust’s core intent while offering practical flexibility for trustees and beneficiaries. Thoughtful revisions can clarify ambiguous provisions, update succession plans, and address modern financial realities without undermining the trust’s fundamental objectives. This preserves continuity of estate planning goals and provides clearer guidance for administration and distribution in the years ahead.
Start by collecting the original trust, all amendments, related wills, powers of attorney, advance health care directives, and records of asset ownership. Having clear documentation of prior intentions and asset titles speeds the petition process and reduces opportunities for dispute. Include correspondence or notes that reflect the trustmaker’s reasoning when available. Documentation supports factual assertions and provides the court with a clear picture of the trust’s history, which can be decisive when evaluating whether proposed adjustments honor the trustmaker’s objectives while addressing current needs.
Evaluate potential tax consequences and how changes may affect creditor claims or public benefits for beneficiaries. Certain modifications might trigger unintended tax events, affect eligibility for government benefits, or expose assets to creditor remedies. Addressing these issues early with relevant financial documentation and legal analysis helps tailor the petition to avoid adverse consequences. Where appropriate, propose alternative drafting that achieves the same policy goals while minimizing tax impact and protecting vulnerable beneficiaries, making the proposed revisions more palatable to the court and other parties.
People pursue trust modification petitions for many practical reasons, including changes in family dynamics, remarriage, divorce, birth of grandchildren, or the death of a beneficiary. Other triggers include outdated distribution terms, ambiguous language that creates confusion, or the need to replace a trustee who can no longer serve. Modifications can also address tax planning opportunities or remove obstacles that prevent effective administration. When life or circumstances make the trust’s original terms impractical or unfair, a petition offers a legal pathway to update the document while preserving the settlor’s overall plan.
Another frequent reason is to correct drafting errors or oversights discovered after the trust was funded. Errors in beneficiary designations, unclear successor trustee instructions, or provisions that conflict with current law can all justify seeking a court-ordered modification. Parties may also need to resolve competing claims or clarify powers of the trustee to avoid administrative gridlock. In many instances, careful modification avoids future litigation and helps trustees administer the trust consistently with the settlor’s intended goals, protecting assets and maintaining family harmony.
Common circumstances include significant life changes like marriage, divorce, or the addition of new family members; changes in asset composition; or the emergence of creditors or litigation that affect trust administration. Additionally, legal changes or tax law updates may make original provisions inefficient or problematic. Situations that reveal ambiguity or make performance of specific provisions impractical often prompt parties to seek judicial clarification or modification. Identifying the specific circumstance clearly in the petition helps the court understand the need for change and design appropriate relief.
When family circumstances change, such as a marriage, divorce, or birth, the original trust terms may no longer reflect the trustmaker’s intentions. Modifications can reallocate distributions, alter contingent beneficiary designations, or adjust trustee succession plans to match current family needs. It is important to document the reasons for change and how the proposed modifications better reflect the trustmaker’s goals. Clear explanation in the petition reduces confusion and helps the court make an informed decision that honors the trust’s purposes while adapting to new personal circumstances.
Significant changes in the trust’s assets, such as selling a business, receiving an inheritance, or transferring retirement accounts, may require revising distribution provisions or trustee powers. The petition can request adjustments to how assets are managed or distributed to ensure the trust remains practical and effective for administration. When asset changes create tax planning opportunities or administrative burdens, proposing clear, narrowly tailored modifications helps the court approve changes that preserve the trustmaker’s intent while accommodating modern financial realities.
Poorly drafted provisions or ambiguous language can produce disagreements among trustees and beneficiaries. A trust modification petition seeks judicial clarification or correction to resolve uncertainty and prevent contentious administration. Correcting mistakes or clarifying unclear terms enhances the trust’s functionality and reduces litigation risk. The petition should present evidence of the drafting issue and why the proposed revision better captures the settlor’s intended distribution scheme, enabling the court to adopt changes that promote consistent and lawful administration of the trust.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provides representation for clients in Bystrom and Stanislaus County seeking trust modifications and related estate planning services. We help residents evaluate their options, prepare petitions, and navigate local court procedures. Our firm explains required notices, assists with document gathering, and advocates for clear, enforceable resolutions. We also coordinate with other professionals when tax, accounting, or special needs issues arise. Local familiarity with court practices and community considerations supports practical, timely handling of trust modification matters for families and fiduciaries.
Selecting appropriate legal representation ensures a thorough evaluation of the trust document and a focused strategy that addresses both legal and practical issues. Our firm guides clients through notice requirements, evidentiary preparation, and petition drafting to present concise, persuasive requests to the court. We emphasize clear communication with beneficiaries and trustees to seek consensual resolutions when possible and prepare robust petitions when court intervention is necessary. This careful approach supports efficient resolution and better protection of the trust’s objectives for beneficiaries.
Our process begins with a detailed review of the trust and ancillary documents to identify the best available path for modification. We advise on potential tax and creditor implications and propose narrowly tailored revisions that address the identified problems without overreaching. Throughout proceedings we prioritize transparent client updates, realistic timelines, and practical solutions aimed at avoiding protracted disputes. When litigation is necessary, we prepare comprehensively to present evidence and argument that aligns with California trust law and local court expectations.
We also coordinate with financial advisors, accountants, and other professionals to ensure proposed changes are practical and administrable. This interdisciplinary approach helps anticipate downstream consequences and produces clearer, more enforceable outcomes. Whether working toward an uncontested agreement or representing clients in contested proceedings, our firm focuses on preserving the trustmaker’s intentions and protecting beneficiary rights. Clients receive guidance tailored to their situation and practical recommendations for next steps in the modification process.
Our process starts with a comprehensive intake to review the trust, amendments, and related estate planning documents like wills, powers of attorney, and advance health care directives. We assess whether an amendment, consensual agreement, or court petition is the most appropriate path. If a petition is recommended, we prepare supporting documentation, draft proposed revisions, and ensure proper notice to interested parties. We seek to resolve matters through agreement when feasible, while preparing a persuasive petition and litigation plan if court intervention becomes necessary, keeping clients informed at every step.
The first step is a careful review of the trust instrument, amendments, and related documents to identify ambiguities, inconsistencies, or provisions that no longer function as intended. We compile a factual record, examine asset titles, and assess beneficiary designations and potential creditor issues. This assessment determines the grounds for modification and whether voluntary amendment or a consensual approach is possible. Clear documentation at this stage lays the foundation for an effective petition and helps anticipate areas of potential dispute that require additional evidence.
We identify legal and factual grounds supporting modification, such as mistake, changed circumstances, or impracticability of original terms. This includes gathering evidence like correspondence, financial records, or medical information that clarifies the trustmaker’s intent. We evaluate whether beneficiary consent can resolve the issue or whether court approval is necessary. By clearly articulating the basis for change and assembling supporting documents, the petition is designed to present the strongest possible case for judicial authorization of the proposed revisions.
Proper notice to beneficiaries and interested parties is both a legal requirement and a practical step to reduce surprise and opposition. We prepare notice documents, explain potential impacts, and attempt to address concerns through negotiation where appropriate. Early outreach can reveal objections that must be resolved or narrow the scope of contested issues. When beneficiaries agree, a consensual route may avoid court; when disputes persist, clear notice and documented attempts at resolution strengthen the petition and the client’s position at any subsequent hearing.
If a court petition is required, we draft a detailed petition that explains the factual background, sets forth legal authority, and proposes precise modifications. Supporting declarations and exhibits, such as copies of the trust and related documents, accompany the petition. We file the petition in the appropriate Stanislaus County venue, serve required parties, and monitor deadlines and scheduling orders. Attention to procedural requirements helps avoid delays and ensures the court has the necessary information to evaluate the requested relief efficiently.
Drafting proposed revisions requires careful attention to language to ensure the court can adopt changes without creating new ambiguities. We craft alternatives and, where appropriate, include supporting legal argument and factual declarations that explain why the changes achieve the trustmaker’s intent. Precision in drafting reduces the likelihood of follow-up litigation by providing trustees and beneficiaries with a clear roadmap for administration under the revised terms.
After filing, we ensure timely service on all required parties and track responses or objections. This stage may involve preparing proofs of service, scheduling hearings, and responding to objections through briefs or negotiation. Efficient case management and proactive communication with the court clerk and opposing parties helps move the matter toward resolution. Where appropriate, we propose alternative dispute resolution to narrow contested issues before a hearing, reducing time and cost for all involved.
The court may set hearings to consider the petition and any objections. We prepare witnesses, declarations, and legal argument to support the requested modifications, and we engage in settlement discussions when beneficial. If the court grants the petition, it issues an order reflecting the revised trust terms. We then assist with implementing changes, updating trust records, and advising trustees on administration under the new order. Finalizing the process includes filing any required ancillary documents to ensure the modification is properly recorded and enforced.
Preparing for a hearing includes organizing documentary evidence, drafting declarations, and preparing witnesses who can attest to the reasons for modification. We focus on presenting a concise factual narrative that explains why the court should authorize the change and how it protects beneficiaries’ interests. Clear presentation and responsiveness to judicial questions are important to achieve a favorable outcome and secure an order that trustees can implement confidently.
Following a court order, we assist in updating trust records, notifying relevant institutions, and confirming that asset titles and account registrations reflect the revised terms. We advise trustees on administrative duties under the new order and help beneficiaries understand their rights. Where additional filings or filings with financial institutions are required, we coordinate those steps to ensure the trust functions smoothly under its updated provisions and that distributions and management follow the court-approved modifications.
A trust modification petition is a legal request filed in court asking for permission to change the terms of an existing trust when direct amendment is not possible or when parties disagree. The petition outlines the factual reasons for the requested change, cites applicable state law, and proposes specific revised language for the trust. The court reviews whether the modification aligns with the trustmaker’s intent and protects beneficiary rights before deciding whether to grant the relief. In many cases, petitioning the court is necessary when the trustmaker is unavailable to sign amendments, when ambiguities create disputes, or when changes affect creditor or tax issues that require judicial oversight. The petition process provides formal notice to interested parties and an opportunity for objections, ensuring that modifications are legally binding and enforceable once approved by the court.
Timelines vary widely depending on the complexity of the issues, whether beneficiaries agree, and the court’s calendar. An uncontested matter with full beneficiary agreement and complete documentation may be resolved more quickly, sometimes within a few months, while contested proceedings that require hearings and discovery can take significantly longer. Local court schedules and filing backlogs in Stanislaus County affect timing, as does the need for supplemental evidence or expert input when tax or valuation questions arise. Preparing a thorough petition, providing timely notice, and attempting negotiated solutions when appropriate can shorten the process. We work to set realistic expectations, keep clients informed of scheduling and procedural steps, and pursue efficient resolution strategies such as mediation when it can resolve disputes without extended litigation.
Yes, beneficiaries can object to a proposed modification and the court will consider those objections as part of its review. Objections typically raise concerns about how the proposed change affects distribution rights, trustee authority, or the trustmaker’s intent. When objections are filed, the court schedules a hearing where parties present evidence and legal argument to support their positions, and the judge evaluates whether the proposed modification is appropriate under the circumstances. Because objections can prolong proceedings and increase costs, early communication and negotiation among beneficiaries and trustees often help narrow disputes. When objections persist, careful factual documentation and legal analysis are necessary to address concerns and demonstrate to the court that the proposed revision serves the trust’s purposes while protecting beneficiary interests.
Modifying a trust can have tax and creditor implications depending on the nature of the changes. Certain revisions might affect estate or gift tax treatment, alter trust tax classification, or influence the rights of creditors to reach trust assets. It is important to assess these potential effects before proposing modifications and to include relevant financial analysis in the petition when necessary to inform the court and interested parties. Addressing tax and creditor issues proactively can prevent unintended consequences and make the proposed modification more acceptable to beneficiaries and the court. Coordination with financial advisors or accountants may be required to evaluate the implications and craft revisions that preserve the trustmaker’s objectives while minimizing adverse tax or creditor exposure.
Yes, when the trustmaker is alive and has the authority under the trust provisions, the trust can often be amended directly without court involvement. Likewise, if all beneficiaries and the trustee agree to a change and the trust permits such consensual adjustments, a written beneficiary agreement can modify administration without filing a petition. These approaches are typically faster and less expensive, but they require clear documentation to ensure enforceability and to prevent future disputes. When unanimous agreement is not possible, or when the trustmaker is unavailable, a court petition provides a formal mechanism to authorize changes. Even with beneficiary agreement, legal review is advisable to identify tax or creditor impacts and confirm that the modification complies with statutory requirements and the trust’s formalities.
Helpful evidence includes the trust document and any amendments, correspondence or notes that reflect the trustmaker’s expressed intentions, financial records demonstrating changed circumstances, and declarations from witnesses who can testify about relevant facts. Medical records or affidavits may be important if health or capacity issues are part of the petition. Clear documentary evidence strengthens the petition by showing the factual basis for the requested change and how it aligns with the trustmaker’s goals. Organizing this evidence early and presenting it in a coherent narrative reduces uncertainty and assists the court in understanding why the modification is warranted. Accurate documentation of asset ownership and titles is especially important to show how proposed revisions affect administration and distributions.
A trustee may file a petition to modify a trust when doing so is consistent with their fiduciary duties and when they believe modification is needed to properly administer the trust or to carry out the trustmaker’s intent. The trustee must act in the best interests of beneficiaries, provide proper notice, and document the factual and legal basis for the requested change. Courts scrutinize trustee-initiated petitions to ensure the trustee is not seeking changes that unfairly benefit one party or exceed their authority. When a trustee contemplates filing a petition, it is important to assess potential conflicts of interest and to consider beneficiary reaction. Engaging in early discussions and providing full disclosure can reduce the likelihood of contested proceedings and support a smoother path to court approval if a petition is necessary.
Costs vary based on the complexity of the matter, whether the petition is contested, and the time required for document preparation, service, and hearings. Uncontested matters that proceed through agreement are generally less expensive than contested litigation, which can involve discovery, multiple hearings, and more extensive legal work. Court filing fees and costs for serving notices are additional expenses to budget for during the process. Careful case assessment and early efforts to resolve disputes can reduce overall costs. We provide transparent fee estimates based on the specific facts and propose cost-effective strategies, such as targeted petitions or mediation, when appropriate to limit expense while pursuing the client’s objectives.
Proper notice requires serving beneficiaries and other interested parties with the petition and related documents according to California rules and local court procedures. Notices must be timely and documented with proofs of service to ensure the court recognizes that all required parties were informed. Failure to provide proper notice can delay proceedings or invalidate court action, so attention to service rules is essential from the outset. In addition to formal service, we recommend proactive communication to explain the proposed changes and address questions. Clear outreach can reduce surprise and opposition, and meaningful dialogue may lead to agreements that avoid contested hearings. When objections do arise, documented notice and outreach strengthen the petition and the client’s position before the court.
If the court grants the modification petition, it issues an order detailing the approved changes to the trust. That order becomes part of the trust’s record and guides trustees in administering the trust under the revised terms. Parties must comply with the order, and trustees may need to update trust records, inform financial institutions, and adjust asset titling or account registrations as directed by the court’s decision. Following the order, we assist with practical implementation steps, including updating documentation, notifying relevant institutions, and advising trustees on administration under the revised provisions. If additional steps are required, such as recording documents or filing ancillary paperwork, we coordinate those actions to ensure the trust functions as intended under the court-authorized modifications.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas