If you are considering changing the terms of an existing trust in Ceres, a trust modification petition can be the legal pathway to update beneficiary designations, correct drafting errors, or reflect changed circumstances. This guide outlines the typical reasons property owners and families petition the court to modify a trust, what the process generally looks like in Stanislaus County, and how thoughtful planning can reduce conflict and delay. The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman serves clients throughout California and can advise on whether a petition is appropriate under state law and local practice in Ceres and nearby communities.
A trust modification petition differs from informal amendments because it seeks a court order to change trust terms when the original trust does not provide a clear mechanism or when parties disagree about intent. Petitioning the court can address issues such as ambiguous language, changed family circumstances, removal of a trustee, or clarifying distribution instructions. Filing a petition typically requires careful documentation of facts, legal analysis of the trust instrument and applicable statutes, and coordination with interested parties. Understanding the potential outcomes and timelines helps families make informed choices about next steps for their estate planning needs.
Pursuing a trust modification petition can protect assets, honor the settlor’s true intent, and prevent future disputes that might otherwise lead to lengthy litigation or challenge the validity of distributions. A court-ordered modification can resolve ambiguities, correct mistakes made when the trust was drafted, and adapt an estate plan to family changes like births, deaths, divorces, or financial shifts. When done carefully, the process can preserve privacy compared to full probate, maintain continuity of asset management, and provide peace of mind for trustees and beneficiaries who want clarity about their rights and obligations under the trust.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman, based in San Jose, assists families and fiduciaries across California with trust administration and trust modification petitions. Our approach emphasizes clear communication, careful review of the trust instrument, and practical solutions tailored to each family’s priorities. We guide clients through procedural requirements in Stanislaus County, help assemble necessary documentation, and work with trustees and beneficiaries to seek an outcome aligned with the settlor’s intent. We focus on minimizing conflict and moving cases forward efficiently while ensuring all parties understand their legal rights and responsibilities.
A trust modification petition is a formal request to the probate court asking for changes to a trust when circumstances or language in the document require judicial clarification. Common grounds for filing include mistakes in drafting, ambiguous provisions that lead to differing interpretations, or events that make the original terms impractical. The petition will typically state the reasons for the requested modification, identify interested parties, and propose specific changes. The court evaluates the petition in light of California trust law and the evidence presented, sometimes holding hearings before issuing an order that legally alters the trust terms.
Initiating a petition involves more than drafting revised language; it requires assembling supporting evidence, notifying beneficiaries and other interested parties, and complying with local filing and service rules. Courts give significant weight to the settlor’s intent but will also consider statutory requirements and competing claims. In some matters, interested parties can reach settlements that the court approves, which expedites resolution. Where disagreements persist, the court’s involvement ensures modifications are lawful and enforceable, giving trustees and beneficiaries clear direction moving forward.
A trust modification petition is the mechanism used to ask the probate court to authorize changes to an existing trust when the trust document does not permit a straightforward amendment or when parties disagree on the meaning of provisions. The petition lays out factual circumstances and legal reasons supporting the modification request, such as ambiguous language or clerical errors. The court considers whether the requested change reflects the settlor’s intent and complies with California statutes. When granted, the court issues an order that becomes part of the trust record and guides how the trustee should act.
Key elements of a petition include a clear statement of the requested change, factual background explaining why the change is needed, legal arguments grounded in state law, and identification of all interested parties. Supporting evidence might include the original trust document, related estate planning instruments, written communications from the settlor, and affidavits that clarify intent. The process often involves filing the petition in the appropriate county court, serving notice on beneficiaries and trustees, and attending hearings if disputes arise. The court evaluates the totality of evidence and issues a binding order if it finds the modification appropriate under the law.
Understanding certain terms can make the petition process less daunting. Terms like settlor, trustee, beneficiary, amendment, reformation, and cy pres appear frequently in filings and court rulings. Knowing how these concepts apply to your trust matter helps you follow procedural steps and set realistic expectations about likely outcomes. This glossary section defines those phrases and explains their practical significance for modification petitions, notice requirements, and potential remedies when language in a trust fails to reflect the settlor’s intent or when circumstances change materially since the trust was created.
The settlor, sometimes called the grantor, is the person who created the trust and established its terms. The settlor’s expressed intent at the time the trust was formed is a central factor courts consider when deciding whether to authorize a modification. Evidence of that intent can include the trust instrument itself, contemporaneous letters, communication with the drafting attorney, and conduct demonstrating the settlor’s wishes. Establishing what the settlor intended helps the court determine whether a proposed change accurately reflects those original desires or is inconsistent with the trust’s purpose.
Reformation refers to changing the written terms of a trust to reflect the settlor’s original intent when the document contains a mistake or misstatement. A petition for reformation asks the court to correct drafting errors or ambiguities so the trust’s written language aligns with what the settlor actually intended. Reformation petitions often rely on evidence showing a drafting mistake rather than a change in the settlor’s wishes. The court examines the evidence and may reform the document if it finds clear and convincing proof of a mistake or miscommunication at the time of drafting.
An amendment is a change made according to provisions in the trust that allow the settlor to alter terms without court involvement, typically while the settlor is alive and has capacity. A modification or reformation may involve court approval when the trust lacks amendment provisions, the settlor is deceased or incapacitated, or parties disagree about the meaning of the document. Choosing between an informal amendment and a court petition depends on the trust’s terms, the settlor’s capacity at the time of amendment, and whether all interested parties agree to the proposed change.
Interested parties include beneficiaries, trustees, and others who have a legal or financial stake in the trust’s administration or distributions. California law requires notice to these individuals when a petition seeks to modify trust terms so they can respond or object. Proper notice supports transparency and reduces later challenges. The court will usually require documentation showing how notice was served and may set timelines for responses, hearings, or settlement discussions before ruling on the petition. Ensuring accurate identification and notice of interested parties is an important part of petition preparation.
When considering changes to a trust, there are multiple legal paths: a straightforward amendment if the trust authorizes it, a written agreement among beneficiaries and trustees to settle or modify terms, or a court petition for reformation or modification when agreement is not possible. Informal amendments are fastest but require the settlor’s authority and capacity. Agreements can be efficient when all parties consent, but they must be carefully drafted to avoid future disputes. Court petitions protect parties when there is uncertainty or disagreement, providing a legally binding resolution at the expense of additional time and procedure.
If the settlor is alive, has capacity, and the trust allows the settlor to make amendments, a limited amendment is typically the fastest and least intrusive option. The settlor can execute a written amendment or restatement that clarifies intentions, updates beneficiaries, or corrects errors. Because this approach avoids court involvement, it is usually less costly and keeps the matter private. However, ensuring the amendment follows the trust’s formalities and is properly executed is important to prevent future disputes or questions about validity.
When all beneficiaries and the trustee agree to a change, a written agreement can adjust trust administration or distributions without court action, provided state law and the trust document permit such an arrangement. Agreements should be documented carefully with clear language and consideration for potential future claims. This route can resolve conflicts efficiently and preserve estate plan privacy. It is important that parties fully understand the consequences of the agreement and that notice and consent procedures are properly followed to limit later challenges.
A court petition is often necessary when the trust document contains ambiguous language, suffers from drafting mistakes, or lacks a valid amendment mechanism and the settlor cannot or will not amend it. In such cases the court can interpret provisions or reform the document to better reflect the settlor’s intent. Because judicial involvement requires formal pleadings, evidence, and possible hearings, parties should be prepared for a process that focuses on legal standards, factual proof, and due process for all interested parties.
When beneficiaries dispute trust terms or the trustee’s actions, a comprehensive approach involving a petition helps resolve contested legal issues and protect fiduciary duties. Courts can decide on trustee removal, clarify distribution responsibilities, and order modifications that settle competing claims. This path provides a binding resolution but typically requires more documentation and adherence to procedural rules. Engaging in a well-planned legal strategy helps stakeholders present their positions clearly and pursue outcomes that align with the trust’s purpose and applicable law.
A court-ordered modification produces a clear, enforceable result that reduces the risk of later disputes and provides legal certainty for trustees, beneficiaries, and third parties. When the court issues an order, trustees receive explicit direction about their duties and distributions, which helps avoid ambiguous decision-making and potential liability. Furthermore, a judicially approved modification can address systemic issues in a trust document, such as conflicting clauses or provisions that cannot be resolved by informal methods, creating a more stable estate plan going forward.
Although court involvement can extend timelines and incur additional expense, the benefits include finality and increased protection for all parties. A judicial order can also be recorded or presented to financial institutions to support trustee authority when handling assets. In cases involving complicated holdings, blended families, or significant potential for disagreement, the certainty a court provides often outweighs the costs, particularly where an unresolved dispute might otherwise lead to protracted litigation or draining challenges down the road.
A primary benefit of a court-approved modification is the creation of a legally enforceable document that carries the weight of a judicial order. This clarity helps trustees manage assets confidently and beneficiaries understand their rights. By resolving interpretive questions and formally documenting the change, the court reduces the likelihood of future challenges. The certainty provided by a judicial resolution can be particularly valuable when dealing with banks, title companies, and other institutions that require clear proof of authority to act on trust assets.
Although reaching a court order can be a more formal process, it often reduces long-term conflict by resolving disputed points definitively and minimizing ambiguities that could produce future litigation. Clear guidance from the court can lower administrative burdens on trustees, who otherwise may need to navigate competing beneficiary claims or make contested decisions. A definitive ruling streamlines ongoing trust administration, allowing trustees to allocate resources to managing assets and fulfilling fiduciary duties rather than defending uncertain interpretations.
Collecting and preserving evidence that reflects the settlor’s intentions makes a significant difference in petition matters. Relevant documents might include the original trust, wills, letters of instruction, drafts, emails, and contemporaneous notes from meetings with the drafting attorney. Statements from the settlor, if available, and records showing how assets were managed according to intent can strengthen a petition. Organizing these materials early helps counsel prepare persuasive pleadings and reduces delays associated with document collection and verification.
Exploring negotiated resolutions with beneficiaries and trustees can save time and expense. When parties engage in candid discussions and consider mediated solutions, they often preserve relationships and reach outcomes acceptable to all involved. Settlements that are memorialized and presented to the court can be approved without extended trials, keeping matters more private and predictable. Early negotiation is especially valuable where parties share common goals, such as honoring the settlor’s intent and avoiding the costs associated with contested hearings.
You might consider a trust modification petition if the trust contains ambiguous language that affects distributions, if a clerical error changed the meaning of a provision, or if family circumstances have changed in ways that make the original terms inappropriate. Other reasons include disputes over trustee conduct, the discovery of assets not accounted for by the trust, or a need to correct mistakes made during drafting. Courts can also address situations where an intended beneficiary is misidentified or where outdated provisions need judicial correction to reflect present realities.
Filing a petition is also appropriate when informal amendment is not possible because the settlor is incapacitated or deceased, or when beneficiaries disagree and cannot reach a voluntary agreement. A judicial approach can produce a binding solution and clarify fiduciary duties, which is particularly important for trustees who must act with confidence. Evaluating whether to pursue a petition involves weighing privacy, costs, timelines, and the likelihood of successful modification based on evidence of the settlor’s intent and applicable law.
Typical circumstances include ambiguous drafting that creates competing interpretations, clerical mistakes that alter distribution schemes, changed family dynamics such as divorce or remarriage, diminished capacity of the settlor, and discovery of previously unknown assets. Additionally, disputes over trustee conduct or the need to remove or replace a trustee can prompt petitions. Addressing these matters through the court can create enforceable solutions and minimize future uncertainty, which is important for administrators and beneficiaries responsible for carrying out the settlor’s wishes.
When trust provisions are vague or inconsistent, beneficiaries and trustees may interpret them differently, leading to disputes that can delay administration and disrupt estate distribution plans. A petition to clarify or reform ambiguous language asks the court to determine the intended meaning based on the trust document and supporting evidence. Resolving such ambiguity through a judicial decision ensures uniform application of the trust terms and prevents unilateral actions by trustees that could result in liability or additional litigation.
Clerical mistakes such as typographical errors, incorrect beneficiary names, or transposed provisions can materially affect how a trust operates. A petition for reformation aims to correct those errors by showing evidence of the settlor’s original intent at the time of drafting. Courts require convincing documentation, which is why assembling drafts, correspondence, and related records is important before filing. A successful reformation aligns the trust document with what the settlor meant to accomplish when creating the trust.
Life events such as divorce, remarriage, births, deaths, or significant changes in financial circumstances can render original trust terms impractical or inconsistent with the settlor’s wishes. A petition can adapt the trust to current realities when informal methods are unavailable. Courts consider whether proposed modifications reflect the settlor’s intent and whether they are equitable to beneficiaries. Addressing these changes promptly reduces administrative confusion and helps trustees manage assets in a way that aligns with the settlor’s goals.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provides practical guidance for residents of Ceres and surrounding areas facing trust modification issues. We help clients assess whether a petition is necessary, gather supporting documentation, and handle procedural requirements for filing in Stanislaus County. Our role includes advising trustees on their duties, preparing notices to interested parties, negotiating potential settlements, and presenting petitions to the court when consensus cannot be reached. We aim to keep the process as efficient and clear as possible for families navigating sensitive matters.
Choosing an attorney to handle a trust modification petition means selecting a professional who will review the trust document, identify legal grounds for modification, and help you organize credible supporting evidence. Our firm brings extensive experience in probate and trust administration across California, and we work to explain options plainly so clients can make informed decisions. We prioritize communication, careful preparation, and managing expectations about likely timelines and outcomes for petitions filed in Stanislaus County courts.
Our practice includes preparing petitions, coordinating service and notice, engaging in settlement discussions, and representing clients at hearings when needed. We balance the goal of resolving disputes efficiently with the importance of protecting client rights and preserving estate value. In contested matters we take steps to present clear factual narratives and legal arguments that support our client’s position, while also exploring opportunities to resolve matters amicably when that approach aligns with client goals and the settlor’s intent.
We also assist trustees in understanding their obligations, help beneficiaries evaluate options, and advise on how proposed modifications will affect trust administration and tax considerations. Where requests for modification involve complex asset structures or multiple jurisdictions, we coordinate with other professionals to provide comprehensive guidance. Our objective is to help clients reach a durable resolution that supports the trust’s purpose while minimizing unnecessary delay and expense.
Our process begins with an intake meeting to gather the trust document, related estate planning instruments, and any evidence of the settlor’s intent. We then review the legal and factual basis for a petition, explain options including informal amendment or settlement, and recommend a strategy that reflects client goals. If a petition is appropriate, we draft pleadings, prepare notices for interested parties, and file the case in the proper probate court. Throughout the process we communicate regularly, advise on settlement opportunities, and prepare to present the case at hearing if necessary.
The first step is an in-depth review of the trust, any related estate planning documents, and communications that shed light on the settlor’s intent. We also identify all interested parties and potential procedural issues. Gathering evidence early, including drafts, correspondence, and testimony from knowledgeable witnesses, is essential. This preparatory work determines whether an informal amendment, a negotiated agreement, or a court petition is the best path and sets the groundwork for clear, persuasive filings if court intervention becomes necessary.
Collecting original trust documents, prior drafts, correspondence with counsel, and financial records helps establish the factual foundation for any petition. These materials can demonstrate the settlor’s intent, show where errors occurred, and identify assets subject to the trust. Organizing documents thematically and chronologically allows for efficient analysis and supports drafting a petition that clearly articulates the reasons for the requested modification. Accurate records also streamline the notice process to beneficiaries and other interested parties.
Identifying every interested party is a procedural necessity and prevents later challenges based on improper notice. We review the trust for named beneficiaries, contingent beneficiaries, trustees, and potential creditors who may have a stake. Once parties are identified, we prepare and effect notice according to California probate rules, documenting service so the court has a clear record. Proper notice supports fair process and helps facilitate responses, settlements, or opposition that the court will consider.
After evidence gathering and notice preparation, we draft the petition detailing the proposed modification, the factual background, and the legal grounds for relief. The petition includes exhibits, declarations, and supporting documentation. Filing follows local court rules for probate matters in Stanislaus County. We also serve the petition and supporting documents on interested parties and file proofs of service. This phase requires attention to statutory requirements and procedural deadlines to ensure the petition is procedurally sound and ready for the court’s consideration.
Declarations from witnesses, copies of relevant documents, and a coherent factual narrative strengthen the petition. We prepare statements that explain why the proposed modification aligns with the settlor’s intent and attach exhibits such as draft versions of the trust, correspondence, and financial records. Presenting organized evidence helps the court evaluate the request efficiently and supports any legal arguments about reformation, correction of mistakes, or necessary clarifications.
Filing the petition in the correct county and following local procedures is critical. We handle the filing process, meet filing requirements, and effect service on all interested parties in accordance with statutory rules. Accurate filing and service ensure the court has jurisdiction to decide the matter and prevent procedural delays. Once filed, the court sets a schedule for responses, conferences, or hearings, and we advise clients about potential timelines and steps to address objections or negotiate settlements.
After filing, the court may encourage settlement discussions or schedule a hearing if parties cannot agree. When disputes are resolved through agreement, the parties present joint proposals for the court to approve. If a hearing is necessary, we prepare witnesses, exhibits, and legal argumentation to present the case effectively. The court reviews the evidence and issues an order authorizing or denying the requested modification. Post-order steps include updating trust records, notifying institutions, and implementing the court-approved changes.
We pursue settlement when it serves clients’ interests, engaging with beneficiaries and trustees to reach an agreeable resolution and prepare any necessary documentation for court approval. If settlement is not possible, we prepare for hearing by finalizing witness testimony, organizing exhibits, and shaping legal arguments to address the court’s likely concerns. Strategic preparation helps present a persuasive case and increases the potential for favorable outcomes, while also aiming to keep the process as timely and cost-effective as possible.
Once the court issues an order, we assist trustees in implementing the changes, updating trust records, informing financial institutions, and making required distributions. We also help prepare any follow-up documents, such as restatements or confirmations, that reflect the court-approved modifications. Ensuring accurate implementation protects trustees from future liability and provides beneficiaries clarity about their rights. If further administrative tasks arise, we advise on best practices for ongoing trust management consistent with the court’s directive.
A petition is commonly justified when the trust contains ambiguous wording that leads to differing beneficiary interpretations, when clerical or drafting mistakes change the intended meaning, or when family circumstances have significantly changed since the trust was created. Other grounds include disputes over trustee conduct, discovery of unaddressed assets, or situations where the trust lacks a valid amendment mechanism and the settlor cannot or will not make changes. Courts evaluate whether the proposed modification better reflects the settlor’s intent and whether legal standards for reformation are satisfied. Evidence of the settlor’s original intent and the factual circumstances leading to the requested change supports the petition. Documents such as prior drafts, correspondence with the drafting attorney, records of the settlor’s discussions, and contemporaneous notes can all be helpful. Courts consider the totality of evidence and may allow reformation when proof shows a drafting mistake or miscommunication. Early gathering of these materials strengthens the petition and can clarify whether an informal amendment or settlement might resolve the matter instead.
The timeline for a petition varies depending on case complexity, notice issues, and whether interested parties agree or contest the request. Simple matters with cooperative parties can resolve in a few months, while contested petitions often take longer due to discovery, hearings, and scheduling in the probate court. Local court calendars in Stanislaus County and the need for supplemental evidence or briefing can extend timelines, so preparing documentation promptly and seeking early settlement discussions can shorten the process. Court procedures such as required notice periods, the time allowed for responses from beneficiaries, and potential continuances for additional evidence or settlement negotiations affect overall duration. Engaging counsel to ensure filings comply with local rules, to manage communications with other parties, and to present a focused petition helps avoid avoidable delays and can improve the prospects for an efficient resolution.
Yes, beneficiaries can oppose a trust modification petition if they disagree with the proposed change or the factual and legal basis for it. Opposing parties may file objections, present contrary evidence, or request additional hearings. The court then weighs competing positions and evidence to determine whether the modification should be allowed. Because opposition may complicate and extend the process, parties often explore settlement discussions or mediation to resolve disagreements without a full contested hearing. When beneficiaries oppose a petition, having clear documentation and persuasive legal arguments becomes essential. The court will examine whether the petition meets legal standards for reformation or modification and whether the proposed change aligns with the settlor’s intent. Proper notice, careful evidence assembly, and strategic negotiation can sometimes convert opposition into a negotiated resolution that the court will approve.
The most helpful evidence includes prior drafts of the trust, correspondence or memos showing the settlor’s intentions, contemporaneous notes from meetings with counsel, and testimony from witnesses who had direct communications with the settlor about the disputed provisions. Financial records or documents that show how the settlor managed assets in a way consistent with the proposed modification may also support a petition. Clear documentation that evidences a drafting mistake or miscommunication strengthens the case for reformation. Affidavits or declarations from knowledgeable witnesses, along with a coherent narrative explaining why the modification is needed, allow the court to see the factual basis for the requested change. The combination of documentary proof and credible witness statements helps demonstrate that the proposed modification accurately reflects the settlor’s intent and is legally appropriate under California trust law.
Yes, court filings in probate matters generally become part of the public record, including petitions to modify a trust and the court’s orders. That contrasts with privately executed amendments done by a settlor while alive, which may remain private. However, parties can sometimes minimize exposure by resolving matters through agreement and presenting a joint petition or stipulation for court approval, which may focus on the necessary changes without extensive public disclosure. If privacy is a primary concern, discussing alternatives and settlement possibilities early is important. Counsel can help evaluate whether an informal amendment, beneficiary agreement, or narrowly tailored filing will achieve the desired result while limiting the scope of public records, but the court’s involvement will typically create some public documentation of the action and the outcome.
Yes, trustee removal can be sought as part of a modification or separate proceeding when there is evidence of breach of fiduciary duty, incapacity, conflict of interest, or misconduct that affects trust administration. A petition may request removal and appointment of a successor trustee to ensure proper management of trust assets. The court evaluates the trustee’s conduct, the interests of beneficiaries, and whether removal is necessary to protect the trust’s purpose and assets. When seeking removal, petitioners must present evidence documenting the trustee’s problematic actions or inability to fulfill duties. The court balances the benefit of continuity against the harm caused by continuing the trustee’s role. If removal is granted, the court typically provides instructions for transfer of assets and implementation to minimize disruption to trust administration.
Alternatives include informal amendments by the settlor if they retain amendment power, negotiated agreements among beneficiaries and the trustee, or mediation to resolve disputes. When all parties consent to changes, a written agreement can be presented to the court for approval where appropriate, often saving time and expense. These alternatives preserve privacy and can be efficient, but they require cooperation and clear documentation to avoid future challenges. When parties cannot agree, exploring mediation or settlement discussions before a contested petition often yields practical outcomes. Early negotiation can address concerns, clarify misunderstandings, and lead to an agreed modification that the court can approve without a lengthy hearing. Counsel can help structure agreements to protect the rights of all parties and reduce the likelihood of subsequent litigation.
Legal fees in trust modification matters vary depending on complexity, whether the case is contested, and the need for discovery or court appearances. Some matters are resolved quickly through negotiation, while contested petitions require more time for drafting pleadings, gathering evidence, and presenting the case in court. Fee arrangements can include hourly billing or alternative structures based on the client’s circumstances and the nature of the work required. When evaluating potential fees, clients should consider the likely duration of the case, procedural tasks such as notice and service, and the possibility of settlement. Asking for a clear fee estimate, regular billing updates, and explanations of costs for court filings and service can help families plan. In some cases, the court may award fees from the trust if a party’s conduct makes that appropriate, but this depends on statutory and factual considerations.
No, a settlor does not always need to be deceased to pursue modification; if the settlor is alive and has the capacity to amend the trust, they can often make changes without court involvement through a valid amendment. However, when the settlor lacks capacity, is unavailable, or the trust lacks amendment provisions, parties may need to petition the court to modify the trust. Courts are cautious when modifying a trust absent direct action by the settlor, requiring clear supporting evidence in such cases. If the settlor is alive but incapacitated, the court may consider evidence about the settlor’s prior intent and practical needs in deciding whether to allow a modification. When the settlor is deceased, petitioners often rely on historical documents and witness testimony to show what the settlor intended, and the court evaluates whether a modification or reformation better reflects those intentions.
Court-ordered modifications can affect tax consequences or creditor claims depending on the nature of the change and the timing relative to tax or creditor rights. Some modifications are retroactive in effect, while others apply prospectively, and the court’s order may address how tax obligations or creditor interests should be handled. It is important to evaluate potential tax implications and creditor exposure as part of the petition process and to consult with tax counsel when complex issues are involved. If creditors have actionable claims or if tax consequences arise from a modification, the court may consider notice to affected parties or other procedural safeguards. Parties should plan for potential financial impacts and include appropriate provisions or disclosures in petitions to mitigate unexpected liabilities and to ensure that the trust administration complies with applicable law and equitable considerations.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas