If you are considering changes to a trust in Del Rio, a trust modification petition may be the right path. At the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman, we assist clients with petitions to modify existing trusts to reflect changes in circumstance, law, or intent. This process can involve clarifying ambiguous provisions, correcting administrative problems, updating beneficiaries or trustees, or addressing changes in tax or family situations. We provide clear guidance on whether a court petition is necessary, what evidence is required, and how to protect the interests of trust beneficiaries while pursuing a legally sound outcome that aligns with your goals.
Trust modification petitions can arise for many reasons, and the legal pathway depends on the trust terms and relevant California law. Whether the trust document includes a modification clause, whether all parties agree, and whether the requested change is consistent with the settlor’s intent are key factors. We help clients assess options such as amending a revocable trust during the settlor’s lifetime, petitioning the court to modify or reform a trust, or pursuing nonjudicial solutions. Our approach emphasizes clear communication, careful documentation, and practical strategies to resolve trust issues efficiently and with minimal disruption to family and financial plans.
When a trust no longer reflects a settlor’s wishes or circumstances have materially changed, pursuing a trust modification petition can preserve estate plans and prevent disputes. Modifying a trust by petition can provide clarity for trustees, secure rightful distributions to beneficiaries, and update administrative provisions to meet current needs. Addressing these issues proactively reduces the likelihood of contested litigation later and helps avoid administrative delays. A properly handled petition can also align trust documents with updated tax planning and retirement arrangements, ensuring the settlor’s asset management and legacy goals continue to be achievable under modern circumstances.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman, based in San Jose, serves clients across California, including Del Rio in Stanislaus County. Our team focuses on estate planning and trust matters such as revocable living trusts, trust modification petitions, pour-over wills, and related documents like powers of attorney and HIPAA authorizations. We work closely with clients to understand personal circumstances, family dynamics, and financial objectives so we can recommend practical legal strategies. Accessible by phone at 408-528-2827, we aim to provide responsive support tailored to each client’s needs while maintaining clear communication throughout the petition process.
A trust modification petition is a legal request to the court to change the terms or administration of an existing trust when circumstances require judicial involvement. Reasons for a petition may include ambiguous language that must be interpreted, mistakes in the drafting that do not reflect the settlor’s true intent, changes in family structure, or legal developments that affect how the trust operates. Some modifications can be done nonjudicially if the trust permits and all interested parties agree, but when consensus is absent or legal clarity is needed, a petition offers a formal mechanism to obtain a binding court order.
The petition process involves preparing legal pleadings, demonstrating the basis for modification under California law, and providing supporting evidence such as declarations, trust documents, and relevant communications. The court evaluates whether the requested change aligns with the settlor’s intent and whether it benefits administration or prevents injustice. Parties such as trustees and beneficiaries will be notified and may participate in hearings. The outcome may result in a court order reforming the trust or granting other relief that resolves ambiguity or addresses changes while protecting the trust’s integrity and the rights of interested parties.
A trust modification petition is a formal court filing seeking an amendment, reformation, or clarification of trust terms. This legal procedure is used when a trust instrument does not permit the desired change without judicial approval, or when disputes among interested parties prevent an out-of-court solution. Common grounds for petition include mistakes in the written trust, changes that frustrate a settlor’s intent, or situations where the trust no longer functions as intended due to changed circumstances. The petition asks the court to interpret or modify the document so the trust can be administered effectively and in accordance with the settlor’s probable intent.
Filing a trust modification petition requires a clear statement of the relief sought, the legal basis for modification, and supporting evidence demonstrating why the court should act. Essential elements include identifying the trust instrument, the settlor, current trustees and beneficiaries, the specific provisions at issue, and the nature of the proposed change. The process also involves serving notice to interested parties, responding to any objections, and presenting evidence at hearings. Proper factual development and legal argumentation are critical to securing an order that achieves the intended outcome while minimizing risk of future disputes.
Understanding common terms helps demystify trust modification petitions. Familiarity with phrases like settlor, trustee, beneficiary, reformation, and pour-over will is important when evaluating potential changes. These terms describe the roles of the parties and the types of legal relief the court may grant. Knowing what each term means and how it applies to your situation allows you to make informed decisions about petition strategies and to communicate more effectively with counsel. Below are concise definitions of the most relevant concepts you will encounter during the process.
A settlor is the person who created the trust and established its terms. The settlor’s intent and written directions are central to any petition seeking modification; courts will attempt to honor that intent when interpreting ambiguous provisions or correcting mistakes. Understanding the settlor’s purpose, the circumstances under which the trust was created, and any contemporaneous documents or statements can be pivotal in supporting a petition. Evidence about the settlor’s intent may include drafts, correspondence, or testimony from persons familiar with the settlor’s plan.
Reformation is a court-ordered correction of a trust document to reflect the true intentions of the settlor when a mistake in the writing misstates those intentions. Reformation can be requested when the settlor’s actual plan was not accurately recorded due to drafting errors or omissions. To obtain reformation, petitioners typically present evidence showing the settlor’s original intent and how the written trust deviates from that intent. The court then modifies the document to conform to what was intended, while ensuring fairness to affected beneficiaries and trustees.
A trustee is the individual or entity responsible for managing trust assets and carrying out the trust’s terms. Trustees have fiduciary duties to act in beneficiaries’ best interests and to administer the trust according to its provisions and applicable law. When a modification petition is filed, trustees are often joined as parties because changes can alter their duties or the way assets are handled. Trustees must provide records and may be asked to explain administrative practices, distributions, and their understanding of the trust’s operative language.
A pour-over will is a testamentary document designed to transfer any assets that were not placed into a trust during a settlor’s lifetime into the settlor’s trust at death. It serves as a safety net to ensure the trust receives remaining assets and that the settlor’s overall estate plan is carried out. While a pour-over will itself is not a trust modification, its role in an estate plan is often discussed during trust modifications to ensure cohesive administration and to prevent unintended results if trust terms are changed.
When a trust requires change, there are multiple legal options to consider, including nonjudicial amendments where allowed, court petitions for reformation or modification, and settlement agreements among interested parties. Nonjudicial amendments can be faster and less costly when all parties consent and the trust provides a mechanism for modification. By contrast, court petitions are used when agreement cannot be reached or when a formal interpretation or correction is necessary. Evaluating these options involves weighing timeframes, cost, the strength of supporting evidence, and the potential for disputes among beneficiaries or trustees.
A limited, nonjudicial amendment can be appropriate when all interested parties agree on the change and the trust document expressly permits amendments without court involvement. In such situations, parties may approve a written amendment or execute a new trust instrument that reflects current wishes. This route often reduces expense and avoids a court record, while still achieving the intended update. Clear documentation of consent and careful drafting are necessary to prevent later challenges, and parties should ensure the amendment complies with formal execution requirements to remain legally effective.
A limited approach may be suitable when proposed changes only affect administrative details or trustee procedures without altering beneficiaries’ interests or distributions. Examples include updating contact information for trustees, clarifying administrative processes, or correcting typographical errors that do not change substantive rights. Because these adjustments are generally noncontroversial, they can often be handled through simple amendments or trustee actions under the trust’s terms. Nonetheless, careful recordkeeping and transparent communication with beneficiaries reduce the risk of disputes later on.
When a trust contains ambiguous language or reflects drafting errors that change the settlor’s intended distribution or terms, a comprehensive court petition may be necessary to reform the document. Courts can issue orders that correct errors or clarify intent based on evidence of the settlor’s planning and the circumstances at the time of creation. Pursuing a petition in these cases provides finality and reduces the risk that different parties will interpret the terms inconsistently, which could otherwise lead to prolonged disputes and administrative difficulties for trustees attempting to carry out the trust.
When beneficiaries and trustees disagree about a proposed change or about how the trust should be administered, judicial intervention may be required to resolve competing claims. A comprehensive approach includes preparing a robust petition, managing notice and service requirements, handling discovery if necessary, and presenting evidence and legal arguments at hearing. This process ensures that all parties have an opportunity to be heard and that the court’s decision will be binding, which can bring resolution to contested matters that cannot be settled through negotiation alone.
Pursuing a trust modification through the court offers certainty and a clear legal resolution when disagreements or legal uncertainties exist. A court order can settle disputes about intent, correct drafting errors, and establish enforceable instructions for trustees. While judicial proceedings can require more time and resources than informal amendments, the resulting clarity and finality often prevent future conflicts and administrative confusion. For families facing complex situations or when beneficiaries have conflicting interpretations of the trust document, a court-ordered modification can protect long-term interests and preserve the settlor’s intended plan.
Another advantage of a comprehensive approach is the structured opportunity to present evidence and testimony that supports the requested change, including declarations, trust drafts, and records that document the settlor’s intent. Courts are positioned to weigh competing accounts and issue an order that balances legal principles with equitable considerations. This process can also address related issues such as trustee accounting or requests for instructions, providing a holistic resolution rather than piecemeal fixes. Ultimately, a court proceeding can deliver a durable solution acceptable to the legal system and enforceable against all parties.
A court-approved modification produces a legally enforceable order that clarifies the trust’s terms and the duties of trustees. This form of resolution reduces the chance of subsequent legal challenges and gives trustees confidence to act in accordance with the court’s directions. Enforceability is especially important when assets are substantial, the trust governs complicated distributions, or there is a history of disagreement among beneficiaries. By securing a formal order, parties gain dependable guidance that withstands future scrutiny and supports orderly trust administration over time.
A court process is structured to protect the rights of all interested parties, ensuring that beneficiaries receive notice and an opportunity to be heard. When a petition addresses ambiguous or disputed provisions, the court evaluates claims with impartiality and issues a resolution that balances equitable concerns and statutory requirements. This protective framework helps avoid unequal treatment of beneficiaries and reduces the risk of unfair outcomes. The result helps trustees carry out decisions with transparency and accountability, which benefits all parties who rely on proper trust administration.
Begin by collecting the original trust instrument, any amendments, related wills such as pour-over wills, powers of attorney, trust certifications, and correspondence that illustrate the settlor’s intent. Financial statements, trustee accounting records, and contemporaneous notes or drafts of the trust can all be useful. These materials form the factual foundation for any petition and help clarify whether a nonjudicial amendment is possible or if court involvement is necessary. Organized documentation improves the likelihood of a favorable, timely resolution and reduces uncertainty during the legal process.
When seeking trust modification, evaluate how the proposed change interacts with the settlor’s overall estate plan, including wills, beneficiary designations, retirement plan trusts, and related documents like HIPAA authorizations or advance health care directives. Changes that appear minor can have unintended consequences elsewhere, so it is important to view the request in context. Ensuring consistency among documents protects beneficiaries’ interests and helps avoid the need for additional petitions later. A holistic review can uncover related updates that improve the functionality and clarity of the entire plan.
You should consider a trust modification petition if the trust no longer reflects the settlor’s intentions or when unforeseen events make current provisions impractical. Changes such as divorce, remarriage, births, deaths, significant asset transfers, or changes in tax law can all justify a formal modification. Similarly, if the trust contains drafting errors, omissions, or ambiguous language that leads to conflicting interpretations, a petition can provide a definitive resolution. Seeking timely action can prevent administration delays and reduce the likelihood of costly disputes among beneficiaries.
Another reason to pursue a petition is when trustees need court instructions to carry out their duties without fear of liability. When trustee duties are unclear or when complex assets require judicial direction for proper management and distribution, a petition can clarify responsibilities and empower trustees to act. Additionally, a court-ordered modification can be helpful when parties have competing claims and cannot reach agreement through negotiation, providing a clear, enforceable path forward that protects the legal rights of interested parties and stabilizes ongoing trust administration.
Petitions often arise from practical or legal problems such as ambiguous trust language, unintended beneficiaries named due to drafting mistakes, outdated tax provisions, or changes in family dynamics that were not anticipated in the original document. Other common triggers include loss or destruction of original trust documents, trustee incapacity or resignation, and situations where prior estate planning documents conflict with current circumstances. Recognizing these triggers early helps parties evaluate whether a petition is the appropriate remedy to restore clarity and ensure fair administration.
When trust provisions are unclear or appear to conflict with one another, trustees and beneficiaries may disagree about how to proceed. Such ambiguity can hinder distributions and impede proper administration. Filing a petition to interpret or reform the trust allows a court to resolve conflicting language and provide a definitive direction that trustees can follow. This avoids uneven interpretations among parties and prevents the trust from being administered inconsistently, which can result in disputes and administrative inefficiency.
Drafting mistakes such as inaccurate beneficiary names, incorrect asset descriptions, or omitted clauses can frustrate the settlor’s plan and lead to unintended results. A trust modification petition for reformation can correct these errors by aligning the written document with evidence of the settlor’s actual intent. Presenting drafts, communications, or witness testimony that demonstrate the intended terms supports the petition. Correcting such mistakes ensures the trust operates as originally intended and prevents unjust outcomes for beneficiaries.
Significant life events like divorce, remarriage, births, or substantial changes to asset composition may render existing trust terms impractical or inconsistent with current wishes. A petition can address these changes by modifying distribution provisions, trustee powers, or administrative mechanisms so the trust remains effective and relevant. Addressing these matters proactively helps ensure that the settlor’s updated priorities are reflected in the plan and reduces the chance that outdated provisions will produce unfair or unintended effects for present beneficiaries.
Although based in San Jose, the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman serves clients throughout California, including Del Rio and Stanislaus County. We provide guidance on whether a trust modification petition is appropriate for your circumstances, help gather necessary documentation, manage communications with trustees and beneficiaries, and represent clients in court when judicial relief is required. Our goal is to help clients navigate the legal process efficiently while protecting their interests and preserving family relationships to the extent possible. Contact our office at 408-528-2827 to discuss next steps and available options.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman focuses on estate planning and trust matters and provides personalized attention to each client’s situation. We emphasize careful factual investigation, strategic legal planning, and clear communication with trustees and beneficiaries. With an understanding of California trust law and courtroom practice, we prepare thorough petitions and supporting evidence to present your case effectively. Our approach seeks practical, durable solutions that align with the settlor’s intent while minimizing the time and cost involved in resolving trust disputes.
We assist clients with all aspects of trust modification, including gathering documentary evidence, preparing pleadings, coordinating service and notice, responding to objections, and representing clients at hearings when necessary. We prioritize documenting efforts to reach agreement where possible, while also being prepared to pursue judicial relief when required to protect client interests. Our goal is to provide a clear path forward, whether that results in a negotiated amendment or a court-sanctioned modification that provides lasting clarity for trustees and beneficiaries.
Clients appreciate practical guidance on how a proposed modification interacts with related estate planning documents such as revocable living trusts, pour-over wills, retirement plan trusts, HIPAA authorizations, and powers of attorney. We review the entire estate plan to ensure consistency and to identify any additional steps needed to preserve intended outcomes. With attention to both legal detail and the human aspects of family planning, we strive to resolve trust issues respectfully while safeguarding legal and financial interests for all parties involved.
Our process begins with a focused review of the trust document and related estate planning materials to determine whether a nonjudicial amendment is possible or a court petition is required. We advise on documentation to support the requested change and explain the steps involved, including notice requirements and likely timelines. If a petition is needed, we prepare thorough pleadings and manage communications with interested parties, aiming to resolve matters efficiently while protecting legal rights. Throughout, we keep clients informed and provide practical recommendations tailored to their objectives and family circumstances.
The first step is a comprehensive assessment of the trust, related documents, and the facts that give rise to the requested modification. We examine the trust language, any amendment provisions, and supporting materials like drafts or correspondence to identify grounds for amendment or reformation. During this stage, we also identify interested parties who must be notified and evaluate whether a negotiated amendment is feasible. This review sets the foundation for a strategic plan and determines whether pursuing a judicial petition is the most appropriate course.
Collecting and organizing relevant documents is essential for a persuasive petition. Evidence may include original trust instruments, prior drafts, communications that reflect the settlor’s intent, financial records, and trustee accountings. Witness statements or declarations from individuals with knowledge of the settlor’s planning process can also be important. Careful assembly of this material allows us to craft a clear factual narrative that supports the requested modification and anticipates potential objections from other parties.
If the trust permits and all interested parties can agree, a nonjudicial amendment may be an efficient alternative to a court petition. We assess the trust terms, determine whether unanimous consent is required, and evaluate the feasibility of achieving a negotiated amendment. Where appropriate, we facilitate communications and draft corresponding documents to record any agreements. If negotiations are unsuccessful or not possible, we proceed to prepare the necessary court filings to pursue the modification through judicial channels.
When a court petition is required, we prepare comprehensive pleadings that set forth the requested relief, the factual basis for reformation or modification, and supporting legal authority. We ensure that all interested parties are properly named and served and that notice requirements under California law are met. The petition is filed with the appropriate court, and supporting declarations and exhibits are submitted to document the settlor’s intent and any alleged mistakes in the trust instrument. This stage establishes the formal record for judicial consideration.
Properly notifying trustees, beneficiaries, and other interested parties is a mandatory component of the petition process. We prepare and arrange for service of the petition and any required notice documents in accordance with procedural rules so that the court can proceed on a sound basis. Timely and accurate notice helps protect the validity of any subsequent court order and provides parties with the opportunity to participate in the process or raise objections, which the court will consider in its evaluation of the requested modification.
If objections arise after filing, we address them through legal briefing, evidence, and negotiations to seek a resolution. Settlement discussions can sometimes yield agreements that avoid lengthy litigation; in such cases, a stipulation or consent order may be presented to the court. When objections cannot be resolved, we prepare for hearings by organizing testimony and exhibits to support the petition, always mindful of preserving client interests and aiming for an outcome that provides durable clarity for the trust’s administration.
After briefing and any necessary discovery, the court will evaluate the petition, hear testimony and argument, and issue an order resolving the requested modification or reformation. The order will specify the changes to the trust document and may include directions for trustee actions or accounting. Once the court issues a binding resolution, trustees can act with confidence pursuant to the court’s instructions. We assist clients in implementing any orders and in updating trust records to reflect the court-approved modification.
At hearing, the court considers declarations, documentary evidence, and witness testimony to determine whether the requested modification is appropriate and aligns with the settlor’s intent. We prepare witnesses, organize exhibits, and present a concise factual and legal argument tailored to the court’s standards. Careful preparation increases the likelihood the court will find in favor of reformation or modification when the record supports the settlor’s original intentions. The hearing culminates in a judicial determination that resolves disputes and provides enforceable direction.
Once the court issues its order, we help trustees and beneficiaries implement the decision, including updating trust documents, adjusting asset titles if necessary, and preparing any required filings. Ensuring that the court’s directives are properly executed helps prevent future challenges and keeps trust administration aligned with the court-approved terms. We also advise on any follow-up steps, such as preparing revised trust certifications, updating bank and brokerage records, and coordinating with financial institutions to reflect the modified trust structure.
A trust modification petition is a court filing that requests a judicial order to amend, reform, or interpret the terms of an existing trust. Petitioners typically pursue this path when the trust document contains ambiguous language, drafting errors, or circumstances have changed such that the trust no longer functions as intended. Courts consider evidence of the settlor’s intent, any mistakes in the written instrument, and whether modification would further the trust’s original purpose. The petition seeks a binding resolution that clarifies rights and duties for trustees and beneficiaries. This remedy is necessary when nonjudicial remedies are unavailable or when interested parties cannot reach agreement on an amendment. It is also appropriate where a formal interpretation is needed to guide administration. The process requires careful preparation of pleadings, supporting evidence, and proper notice; it results in a court order that provides legal finality, preventing inconsistent interpretations and protecting parties involved in administering the trust.
Yes, many trusts allow for nonjudicial amendments if the trust instrument includes a provision for amendment or if all interested parties agree to a modification. When unanimous consent is achievable, parties can execute written amendments or restatements that update the trust without court involvement. This approach is often faster and less expensive than a petition and avoids creating a public court record. It is important that any amendment complies with the trust’s execution formalities to ensure validity. However, when the trust does not permit nonjudicial changes, when all parties cannot agree, or when there are disputes about the settlor’s intent, going to court may be necessary. In such situations, a petition provides a formal mechanism to obtain a legally enforceable order that resolves ambiguity and clarifies administration for trustees and beneficiaries.
Evidence supporting a reformation petition typically includes the original trust document, drafts, correspondence, and other materials that demonstrate the settlor’s intent. Declarations from witnesses who were involved in the trust’s preparation or who have knowledge of the settlor’s planning can be important. Financial records and trustee accountings may also help establish the context in which the trust was created and how the trust has been administered since its creation. Courts look for clear, convincing evidence that the written instrument fails to reflect the settlor’s actual intent due to mistake or drafting error. Providing a coherent record that links the settlor’s objective to the proposed correction increases the likelihood that the court will grant reformation, especially when the requested change promotes the trust’s original purpose and does not unfairly prejudice beneficiaries.
When a petition is filed, the law requires notice to all interested parties so they have an opportunity to participate or object. Interested parties generally include current trustees, beneficiaries, and sometimes fiduciaries named in related documents such as powers of attorney or guardianship nominations. Proper service is a procedural requirement that ensures fairness and gives the court the jurisdiction to issue orders affecting those parties’ rights. The specific notice requirements depend on the nature of the petition and California statutory rules. Failure to provide adequate notice can jeopardize the petition’s outcome, so accurate identification and timely service on all interested parties are essential. Our firm assists in preparing and executing notice to minimize procedural risk and to provide interested persons with the information they need to respond.
The timeline for a trust modification petition varies depending on complexity, court schedules, and whether disputes arise among interested parties. Simple matters with cooperative parties and clear documentation may be resolved more quickly, while contested cases requiring discovery, motion practice, or multiple hearings will take longer. Expect several months in many cases, and potentially longer if significant factual development or litigation is required. Expedited resolution is sometimes possible when issues are straightforward or when parties reach settlement. Our approach emphasizes efficient case management, early determination of necessary discovery, and efforts to negotiate where appropriate to shorten timelines. We provide realistic time estimates at the outset and keep clients informed as the matter progresses through the court process.
Yes, beneficiaries may oppose a requested modification if they believe it will harm their interests or if they dispute the factual basis for the petition. Objections can lead to formal responses, discovery, and contested hearings where each side presents evidence and legal arguments. An opposing beneficiary may argue that the trust language is clear as written or that the proposed change would create unfairness or violate statutory protections. When opposition arises, the court evaluates competing positions and the weight of the evidence regarding the settlor’s intent and any alleged mistake. Resolving objections can involve negotiation, settlement, or a contested hearing. Careful preparation of supporting evidence and a clear legal framework for the requested change increase the likelihood of prevailing in the face of opposition.
A court-ordered modification can have tax or beneficiary implications depending on the nature of the change. Modifications that alter ownership, distribution timing, or the classification of assets may affect estate tax planning or beneficiary entitlements. It is important to evaluate any proposed change in light of tax consequences and to coordinate with financial advisors when necessary to avoid unintended outcomes. Before proceeding, review the broader estate plan, beneficiary designations, and retirement account arrangements to ensure consistency. Where appropriate, we coordinate with tax professionals to assess potential implications and to select modification strategies that minimize adverse effects while achieving the settlor’s objectives.
Alternatives to filing a petition include negotiating an amendment with all interested parties, executing a new trust instrument if permitted, or using settlement agreements that resolve disputes without court intervention. These alternatives can save time and expense and keep resolutions private. Nonjudicial routes require cooperation and clear documentation to ensure the change is valid and enforceable. Mediation or facilitated negotiation can also be effective tools for resolving disagreements over trust terms. These approaches allow parties to explore mutually acceptable solutions guided by neutral assistance, often preserving relationships and achieving outcomes that satisfy the practical needs of trustees and beneficiaries without the formality of litigation.
Trustees facing a contested modification can protect themselves by maintaining thorough records of administration, acting in accordance with the written trust, and seeking the court’s instructions when duties are unclear. Providing transparent accounting and documenting decision-making steps helps demonstrate the trustee’s good-faith efforts to fulfill fiduciary responsibilities. When in doubt, requesting judicial guidance can shield a trustee from liability for uncertain or disputed actions. Engaging with counsel early to manage communications with beneficiaries and to evaluate potential risks is also advisable. Trustees who proactively seek clarification and who follow procedural requirements such as proper notice reduce exposure to personal liability and help preserve an orderly trust administration process.
To get started, gather all relevant trust documents, amendments, wills, powers of attorney, and any drafts or communications that explain the settlor’s intent. Prepare a summary of the issues you see in the trust, including dates, parties involved, and the outcome you seek. This factual groundwork allows for an efficient initial assessment to determine whether a nonjudicial amendment is viable or whether a petition should be pursued. Contact the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman to schedule a consultation; we will review your materials, discuss options, and outline a practical plan. If a petition is advisable, we will explain the steps, anticipated timeline, and the types of evidence needed to support the requested modification, while keeping communication clear and focused on resolving matters efficiently.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas