If you are dealing with estate matters in Denair and need to place assets into a trust after death, a Heggstad petition can be an essential legal tool. This petition asks the court to accept transfer documents or asset assignments that were prepared to place property into a trust but were not completed during the grantor’s lifetime. Residents often seek a Heggstad petition when a trust is in place but certain assets remain titled in the name of the deceased. We explain how the petition works, when it is appropriate, and what local families can expect from the process in Stanislaus County.
Filing a Heggstad petition can help avoid a prolonged probate and clarify ownership of assets intended for a trust. Typical scenarios include bank accounts, deeds, or retirement accounts that never transferred into the trust as planned. The petition asks the court to recognize that the decedent intended the assets to be governed by the trust, allowing the trustee to administer those assets according to the trust terms. This page outlines the steps, terminology, and scenarios relevant to Denair property owners, and describes how to prepare documentation and gather evidence to support your petition.
A Heggstad petition provides a practical route to honor the deceased’s estate plan without full probate proceedings when property was intended to be in a trust but remained titled otherwise. Benefits include reducing delay, enabling the trustee to handle assets according to the trust instrument, and clarifying ownership for banks, title companies, and other holders of property. The petition can help preserve privacy and reduce administrative costs compared with a contested probate. For families in Denair, the petition can be a decisive step toward efficient asset transfer and can free assets for beneficiary use under the trust’s distribution terms.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman assists clients across California with estate planning and probate-related matters, including Heggstad petitions for assets that were intended to be placed in trusts. Our practice focuses on clear communication, thorough document preparation, and careful attention to local court requirements in Stanislaus County. We work with fiduciaries, family members, and trustees to assemble affidavits, transfer documents, and evidence of intent that support a petition. If you need help evaluating whether a Heggstad petition is appropriate or preparing the necessary filings, we provide practical assistance to help move the process forward efficiently and respectfully.
A Heggstad petition is a court filing that asks the probate court to treat certain assets as if they had been transferred into a trust during the decedent’s life, based on the decedent’s intent and surrounding documents. It is commonly used when a decedent prepared documents, such as a general assignment to trust or a trust certificate, but the final transfer was not completed. The court examines affidavits, draft documents, bank records, and testimony to determine whether the asset should be treated as trust property. This process can be faster and less formal than full probate and helps trustees carry out the decedent’s plan.
The petition requires supporting evidence showing the grantor intended the asset to be part of the trust, including signed but unrecorded deeds, assignment forms, or contemporaneous trust documents. The court may also review account statements, beneficiary designations, and witness statements to confirm intent. Once approved, the petition grants authority to the trustee to manage or distribute the asset under the trust’s terms. Understanding what proof the court will consider and how to present it is essential to a successful petition, and careful preparation of affidavits and exhibits usually improves the likelihood of a favorable outcome.
A Heggstad petition derives from California case law permitting a court to treat assets as trust property where there is clear evidence the decedent intended them to be included. It is commonly filed when formal transfer steps were missed or when title remains in the decedent’s name. The petition asks the probate court to recognize transfers that were planned but not completed and to authorize the trustee to administer or distribute those assets. Using a Heggstad petition can resolve ambiguity without opening a full probate administration, provided the evidence shows convincing intent and consistent documentation supporting the trust disposition.
Key elements of a successful petition include proof of the trust instrument, documents or draft deeds showing intent, affidavits from witnesses or attorneys, and a clear description of the assets to be resolved. The process typically involves identifying the assets, gathering supporting paperwork, preparing the petition and exhibits, providing notice to interested parties, and attending a hearing if required. Courts assess the credibility of the evidence and may require additional testimony or documentation. Preparing organized, coherent exhibits and clear affidavits is central to showing that the decedent intended the asset to be part of the trust.
Understanding the terminology used in Heggstad petitions helps families and fiduciaries navigate filings and communications with the court. Terms such as trustee, grantor, affidavit, transfer on death, general assignment to trust, and certificate of trust appear frequently in petitions and supporting documents. Familiarity with these concepts ensures clearer collection and presentation of evidence when seeking a judicial declaration that assets belong to a trust. This glossary provides concise definitions to help you identify the documents and statements needed to support a petition in Stanislaus County or elsewhere in California.
Grantor refers to the person who created the trust and who intended for certain assets to be governed by that trust. In Heggstad matters, the grantor is typically deceased and evidence of their intent regarding asset transfers is central to the petition. Documentation such as the trust instrument, draft assignments, and correspondence can support an assertion that the grantor intended a particular asset to be included within the trust. Statements from individuals who observed the grantor’s planning or saw the signed documents can also be relevant to show the grantor’s intent.
An affidavit is a written, sworn statement used to present facts and evidence supporting the Heggstad petition. Affidavits can be provided by trustees, witnesses, or individuals familiar with the grantor’s trust planning and transfers. These sworn statements typically describe the documents prepared, the circumstances of signing, and any communications showing the grantor’s intent. Properly drafted affidavits attach exhibits such as unsigned deeds, account forms, or trust pages and establish a clear narrative for the court to consider when deciding whether to treat an asset as trust property.
The trustee is the person or entity named in the trust responsible for managing and distributing trust assets according to the trust’s provisions. When a Heggstad petition is requested, it is usually the trustee who files the petition or a beneficiary who requests the court to place an asset into the trustee’s control. The trustee’s role includes collecting evidence of the grantor’s intent, presenting documentation to the court, and, if authorized, administering or distributing the asset under the trust once the court approves the petition.
A general assignment to trust is a document intended to transfer property into a trust, often used when an asset’s title cannot be immediately changed or recorded. In Heggstad petition scenarios, a draft or signed general assignment that was never formally recorded can still serve as evidence of intent to include the asset in the trust. Courts will review the assignment’s text, signatures, and related communications to determine whether the grantor intended the transfer and whether the trustee should be permitted to administer the asset as trust property.
When assets intended for a trust remain titled outside the trust, alternatives to a Heggstad petition include opening a probate estate, using small estate procedures, or negotiating directly with financial institutions. A Heggstad petition often offers a targeted approach that addresses only the assets in question without initiating full probate. However, probate or other court processes may be necessary if multiple creditors or disputed beneficiaries are involved. Evaluating the available options involves considering the asset types, the strength of documentation showing intent, and the preferences of beneficiaries and fiduciaries when deciding how to proceed efficiently and economically.
A focused Heggstad petition may be appropriate when the evidence clearly supports that specific assets were meant to be included in the trust and there are limited interested parties or potential disputes. Supporting documents such as draft deeds, assignment forms, or contemporaneous notes that identify the assets and the grantor’s intent reduce uncertainty. When title holders like banks or title companies are willing to recognize court orders or the trust, a narrow petition can resolve the matter efficiently. This approach minimizes court involvement and concentrates on proving intent for the particular assets in question.
A limited petition may suffice when there are few creditor claims or potential disputes among beneficiaries that would otherwise require a broader probate administration. If obligations are small or manageable and the trust’s terms are uncontested, courts are more likely to grant a petition that places assets into the trustee’s hands for administration. This targeted remedy avoids the cost and delay of formal probate, and can be particularly helpful when the goal is to enable ongoing management or distribution under the trust rather than resolving widespread estate litigation.
A comprehensive legal process may be required when assets are numerous, complex, or when beneficiary relationships are contested. Examples include real estate across jurisdictions, retirement accounts with conflicting designations, or when multiple parties claim an interest. In such situations, a broader probate administration or coordinated legal response helps secure assets, adjudicate competing claims, and ensure statutory notice and creditor processes are followed. While more involved, this route can produce a clearer, court-supervised resolution for complicated estates that cannot be resolved through a narrow petition alone.
When an estate faces substantial creditor claims, tax liabilities, or complex obligations, a comprehensive legal approach is often required. These matters may necessitate formal probate administration to ensure proper notice, claim adjudication, and distribution in compliance with California law. Tax consequences and creditor priorities can affect whether assets can safely be transferred to a trustee without exposing beneficiaries to liability. Handling these issues through expanded legal proceedings protects fiduciaries and beneficiaries by creating a documented, judicially sanctioned record of asset handling and resolution.
A comprehensive approach to resolving estate transfer issues ensures that all legal, tax, and creditor matters are considered and managed in a coordinated manner. This reduces the risk of future disputes and helps ensure that asset transfers comply with both the trust terms and California probate statutes. For families with multiple asset types, complex title issues, or potential contesting parties, a broad strategy provides a structured process for notice, claim resolution, and court oversight. The result can be more predictable and defensible administration of the decedent’s affairs.
By addressing matters comprehensively, trustees and beneficiaries reduce uncertainty about future challenges to distributions and preserve estate assets through methodical handling of claims and legal requirements. This approach also allows better coordination with accountants, title companies, and financial institutions to resolve documentation issues. For those wanting a definitive closure to estate matters and legally robust asset transfers, a full process can provide the documentation and court approvals necessary to minimally expose beneficiaries to later disputes or liabilities.
One major benefit of a comprehensive strategy is the additional legal protection it provides for trustees and beneficiaries. Court involvement and formal adjudication of claims produce a clear record and judicial orders that can be relied upon to defend distributions and asset management decisions. This is especially valuable when title defects, competing claimants, or ambiguous designations could otherwise create exposure. A comprehensive process documents each step, reduces the chance of later disputes, and helps ensure that the ultimate distributions align with the decedent’s documented intentions and applicable law.
A coordinated legal approach enables efficient resolution of interrelated estate issues that might be overlooked in a narrow filing. Addressing creditor claims, tax matters, title corrections, and beneficiary concerns together prevents piecemeal litigation and reduces cumulative cost and delay. This holistic view allows fiduciaries to plan distributions with greater confidence and facilitates smoother interactions with institutions such as banks, brokers, and county recorder offices. For families with complex estates or multiple disputed items, the comprehensive route often results in a cleaner and more durable resolution.
Start by assembling the trust instrument, any amendments, certificates of trust, and any draft or signed transfer documents, such as deeds, general assignments, or beneficiary designation forms. Having these materials organized and labeled will make it easier to build a clear written narrative showing the grantor’s intent. Include relevant bank statements, account numbers, and contemporaneous correspondence that reference the trust. Photocopy originals and prepare exhibits in chronological order so the court can easily follow the evidence supporting your petition.
Reach out to banks, title companies, and other institutions holding the assets to learn what documentation they require to release or transfer assets to the trustee. Early communication can identify potential hurdles such as beneficiary designations, account restrictions, or recording requirements. Some institutions accept a court order; others require particular forms or confirmations. Knowing institutional requirements ahead of filing helps you prepare a more effective petition and can shorten the time to resolution once the court acts.
Families turn to a Heggstad petition when assets intended for a trust remain titled in the deceased’s name, creating barriers for the trustee to manage or distribute those assets. The petition can bridge the gap between intent and legal title, allowing assets to be administered under the trust without a full probate estate. It is particularly helpful for addressing single assets like a home, bank account, or a specific investment account where the documentation supporting transfer is strong but the final recording or retitling was never completed before death.
Another common reason to consider filing a petition is to reduce delay and potential expense compared with opening a full probate administration. When the facts are straightforward and documentation supports the grantor’s intent, the court can often grant a petition that places limited assets into the trustee’s hands for management or distribution. This approach also helps preserve privacy and minimizes public disclosure of estate details that would otherwise appear in probate proceedings, providing a more discreet path to carry out the decedent’s plan.
Typical circumstances include signed but unrecorded deeds for real property, bank or brokerage accounts still in the decedent’s name, retirement or transfer-on-death accounts with conflicting paperwork, or instances where the grantor prepared a general assignment to trust but the account holder did not accept the assignment. These scenarios create mismatches between the trust documents and asset titles that a petition can resolve. It is also used when the trustee needs authority to manage or transfer the asset to comply with the trust’s distribution terms.
When the decedent intended to transfer real property into a trust but the deed was not recorded, a Heggstad petition can request that the court treat the property as trust property based on the evidence of intent. Supporting items may include a signed but unrecorded deed, notary information, correspondence with title companies, and affidavits from witnesses. The petition may prompt the county recorder and title companies to recognize the trust’s interest, enabling the trustee to manage or convey the property under trust instructions once the court issues an order.
Bank, brokerage, or investment accounts sometimes remain in the decedent’s name despite instructions to move them into a trust. A Heggstad petition can be used to demonstrate intent with documents such as account forms, draft assignments, or correspondence indicating the grantor’s plan. The court may then authorize the trustee to access and administer those accounts according to the trust terms. This process often requires clear account records and affidavits describing the deposit history and the grantor’s expressed wishes to include the accounts in the trust.
Personal property such as vehicles, collectibles, or investment interests may have been intended for the trust but lack completed transfer filings. When written assignments, bills of sale, or transfer forms exist but were not executed or recorded properly, a Heggstad petition can seek court recognition of the trust’s interest. Evidence might include storage receipts, purchase records linking the item to the grantor, or affidavits describing the grantor’s planning. Establishing this factual record helps the court determine that the asset should be administered under the trust.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman is available to assist Denair residents and Stanislaus County families with Heggstad petitions and related trust administration matters. We can help you assemble documents, draft affidavits, prepare the petition and exhibits, and file the necessary forms in the appropriate court. Our approach emphasizes clear communication about requirements, potential timelines, and evidence needed to support the petition. If you are unsure whether a petition is the right step, we can review your situation and explain the practical options for moving assets into trust control.
Our firm focuses on helping families translate estate planning goals into enforceable outcomes when transfers do not occur as intended. We assist trustees and beneficiaries with assembling the evidence and filings needed to support a Heggstad petition in Stanislaus County courts. We prioritize careful preparation of affidavits and exhibits, timely court filings, and clear guidance through the procedural steps. This practical, process-driven approach helps reduce delays and ambiguity, making it easier for trustees to manage or distribute assets according to the trust terms.
We also coordinate communications with banks, title companies, and county recorders to determine the documentation each institution requires to recognize trust authority after a court order. This proactive engagement often streamlines the post-judgment transfer or release of assets and reduces repeated back-and-forth with institutional reviewers. By preparing clear petitions and exhibits tailored to institutional needs, the firm helps fiduciaries proceed confidently and improves the likelihood of a smooth administrative outcome following court approval.
Finally, we help trustees understand their duties and responsibilities after obtaining a court order or recognizing an asset as trust property. That includes steps for retitling, inventorying assets, and following trust distribution provisions. Proper follow-through after a petition prevents inadvertent missteps and helps ensure assets are handled in accordance with the decedent’s intentions. We provide practical guidance tailored to the trust instrument and the specific assets at issue, assisting families in completing the administrative tasks that follow a court determination.
Our process begins with a focused review of the trust documents and any draft or signed transfers, followed by a checklist of evidence needed for filing. We gather supporting records, draft the petition and affidavits, and prepare exhibits in a format consistent with court preferences. We file the petition in the appropriate Stanislaus County venue, serve required parties, and respond to any requests from the court or interested parties. Throughout, we keep trustees and beneficiaries informed about timelines, potential outcomes, and next steps after an order is obtained.
The first step involves evaluating the trust instrument, any draft assignment documents, and records for the assets at issue to determine whether a Heggstad petition is appropriate. We identify the title holders, gather account statements and deeds, and locate any correspondence or notes showing the grantor’s intent. This step includes compiling witness lists and drafting affidavits that describe the document creation, signing circumstances, and any related conversations that evidence the grantor’s planning choices, which together form the foundation for the petition.
We carefully review the trust instrument, amendments, and any draft or signed transfer forms to identify specific assets and potential evidentiary support. This review determines what exhibits to attach to the petition and which witnesses should submit affidavits. We look for contemporaneous notes, receipts, and communications that demonstrate the grantor’s intent. Clear identification of assets and a logical evidentiary presentation reduces the chance of follow-up requests and helps the court see the connection between the trust and the assets being petitioned into trust.
Drafting detailed affidavits and preparing easily navigable exhibits is essential for a persuasive filing. We craft sworn statements that explain how documents were created, who was present, and what steps remain to formalize the transfer. Exhibits are organized and annotated for readability so judges and institutional reviewers can quickly connect exhibits to assertions in the petition. Properly prepared affidavits and exhibits often reduce the need for contested hearings and support a more streamlined judicial review process.
Once documents are in order, we file the petition with the probate court, serve interested parties and potential creditors as required by law, and monitor the case for any responses or objections. The court reviews the petition and may set a hearing. We manage all procedural requirements and represent the petitioning party at hearings, presenting the affidavits and evidence that support recognition of the assets as trust property. Our goal is to obtain a court order that authorizes the trustee to administer or transfer the assets under the trust terms.
Filing the petition requires compliance with local court rules, proper formatting of exhibits, and timely service to interested persons. We ensure that all parties who must receive notice are identified and served in accordance with statutory requirements. Serving the proper parties and documenting service protects the order from later challenge on procedural grounds. Clear filing and service practices also help the court proceed without unnecessary delay or administrative rejections.
If objections or inquiries arise, we prepare timely responses and supplemental evidence to address concerns raised by beneficiaries, creditors, or institutional holders. This may include additional affidavits, clarifying documentation, or witness declarations that bolster the showing of intent. Prompt and thorough responses often resolve issues before contested hearings and can persuade the court that a narrow petition is justified. Where hearings are necessary, we present a clear record organized around the trust documents and witness testimony.
After the court grants relief, the trustee follows the court’s order to retitle assets, transfer accounts, or manage property under the trust terms. We assist trustees with implementing the order by notifying institutions, recording deeds if required, and completing forms requested by banks or brokers. Proper documentation of each post-order step helps prevent future challenges and ensures distributions comply with the trust instrument. Our assistance continues through final asset disposition so the trustee can fulfill fiduciary responsibilities responsibly and transparently.
Implementing the court’s order often requires presenting a certified copy of the order to financial institutions or county recorders, completing retitling forms, and recording deeds if necessary. We prepare the necessary cover letters and coordinate with institutional points of contact to confirm requirements for accepting the order. Clear documentation and follow-up reduce delays and support a clean transition of asset control to the trustee. Accurate retitling ensures that the trust fully controls the assets as intended by the decedent.
Following asset transfer, the trustee should inventory the property, maintain appropriate records, and follow the trust’s distribution schedule. Where accounting or notice is required, we help prepare accurate inventories, beneficiary notices, and distribution plans consistent with the trust terms and any court directions. Maintaining detailed records of actions taken after the court order helps protect trustees from later claims and ensures beneficiaries receive assets in accordance with the decedent’s documented intentions.
A Heggstad petition is a legal request filed in probate court asking the judge to treat certain assets as if they had been transferred into an existing trust during the grantor’s life. It is used when the trust instrument exists but specific assets remain titled in the decedent’s name because a transfer was not completed. The petition presents evidence of intent, such as draft deeds, assignments, account forms, and affidavits, and asks the court to authorize the trustee to administer or distribute those assets under the trust. You should consider a Heggstad petition when strong documentary evidence shows the decedent intended the asset to be part of the trust and you want to avoid the time and cost of a full probate administration. The petition is appropriate for singular or limited assets where interested parties are few and the facts are clear. If competing claims, large creditor issues, or broad disputes exist, a broader probate route may be necessary instead.
Proving that an asset was intended for a trust involves assembling contemporaneous documents and sworn statements that connect the asset to the trust plan. Relevant items include the trust instrument and amendments, draft or signed deeds, general assignments, account forms showing the trust name, certificates of trust, and any correspondence that discusses the transfer. Affidavits from people who prepared documents or observed the grantor’s signing provide critical context. The strength of this evidence shapes the court’s willingness to find that the asset should be treated as trust property. The court evaluates not only documents but also the overall narrative and credibility of witness statements. Evidence that shows a consistent plan, such as multiple documents pointing to the same intention or contemporaneous notes, is persuasive. Financial statements showing account activity, title information, and any communications with institutions about moving assets into the trust also help demonstrate intent. Organized exhibits and clear affidavits typically improve the petition’s prospects.
A Heggstad petition can avoid opening a full probate estate for the specific assets addressed in the petition, but it does not automatically exempt every estate matter from probate. The petition seeks to have particular assets treated as trust property so they can be administered by the trustee under the trust’s terms, which can be a more focused alternative to comprehensive probate administration for those items. If the petition resolves the primary asset issues, families may avoid broader probate for those assets. However, other estate concerns such as unresolved creditor claims, disputed beneficiary rights, or assets not covered by the petition may still necessitate probate proceedings. If the estate includes multiple unresolved matters or significant debts that must be addressed through formal probate processes, a Heggstad petition alone may not resolve all estate administration needs. Evaluating the overall estate and potential liabilities helps determine whether the petition or probate is the best route.
The timeline for a Heggstad petition in Stanislaus County varies depending on the complexity of the assets, the completeness of the evidence, and whether interested parties object or the court schedules a hearing. In straightforward cases with clear documentation and no objections, a petition may be resolved in a few months, including time to prepare filings and allow for statutory notice. Preparation and coordination with institutions are significant factors in minimizing overall time to resolution. If objections arise, additional evidence is needed, or the court requires in-person testimony, the process may extend longer. Delays can also occur when institutions request further documentation or when title issues require additional correction. Early preparation of complete exhibits and affidavits and prompt follow-up with banks or recorders usually reduce delay and help the case proceed more efficiently through the probate calendar.
The most persuasive documents include signed deeds, general assignment forms addressed to the trust, the trust instrument itself, and a certificate of trust that verifies the trustee’s authority. Account statements showing the decedent’s intent to use a trust and correspondence with attorneys or financial institutions noting transfer plans are also powerful. These documents create a chain of evidence linking the asset to the trust and clarify the grantor’s intentions regarding the disposition of the property. Affidavits from witnesses involved in drafting or witnessing the documents, or from the trustee describing the circumstances, add credibility. Documentation of contemporaneous steps taken to effect the transfer and any draft paperwork showing the grantor’s plan strengthens the petition. A well-organized set of exhibits that tells a clear factual story is often more persuasive than scattered paperwork without accompanying sworn explanation.
Many banks, brokers, and title companies will accept a court order resulting from a Heggstad petition as the authorized basis to transfer or retitle assets to the trustee. Acceptance depends on institutional policies and the clarity of the court order. Presenting a certified copy of the order along with any required institutional forms and identification usually enables these entities to implement the transfer. Early communication with institutions to learn their requirements can save time after the court issues an order. Some institutions may request additional documentation or have internal review procedures that take time. It is common to prepare a package that includes the court order, certified trust documents, and any retitling forms the institution requires. Coordinating with institutional points of contact and following their specific processes typically leads to smoother implementation of post-order transfers.
Yes, beneficiaries or other interested parties can object to a Heggstad petition if they believe the asset was not intended for the trust or if they contest the factual evidence presented. Objections may prompt the court to require additional proof, schedule a hearing, or consider competing claims. When objections are likely, preparing robust documentation and clear affidavits helps address concerns and reduces the chance of a protracted dispute. If an objection proceeds to hearing, the court will weigh the credibility of the evidence and testimony to decide whether to treat the asset as trust property. Resolving objections may involve submitting further documentary evidence, obtaining witness testimony, or negotiating a settlement among parties. Early disclosure of the evidence and transparent communication can sometimes prevent contested proceedings.
Costs for filing a Heggstad petition vary based on court filing fees, the time required to prepare documents, the need for additional investigations, and whether hearings are contested. Court fees are generally modest relative to opening a full probate estate, but attorney and administrative costs depend on the complexity of organizing documents and responding to objections. When the facts are straightforward, the overall cost is often lower than probate, but contested matters increase expenses significantly. Preparing a cost estimate early helps trustees and beneficiaries budget for necessary steps, including document assembly, affidavit drafting, and potential court appearances. Proactive document gathering, early institutional outreach, and clear presentation of evidence often reduce the time and resources required. Discussing likely scenarios and fees upfront allows families to make informed decisions about whether the petition is a cost-effective route for their situation.
The trustee named in the trust instrument is typically the party who files a Heggstad petition, although beneficiaries or other interested persons may also file if they have a legal interest in obtaining court recognition of the assets. Trustees generally have the standing to request the court to treat assets as trust property so they can fulfill their fiduciary duties. When a successor trustee is in place, that person commonly brings the petition to secure authority for asset management or distribution. If a beneficiary believes the trustee is failing to act, they may petition the court themselves to obtain an order placing the asset under trustee control or to compel action. In contested scenarios, the court evaluates who is the appropriate petitioner and whether the requested relief aligns with the trust terms and relevant law. Proper legal representation and clear presentation of standing and interest improve a petitioner’s ability to proceed effectively.
After the court approves a Heggstad petition, the trustee obtains a certified copy of the order and presents it to the relevant institutions or government offices to retitle assets, transfer accounts, or otherwise place the asset under trust control. The trustee then follows the trust’s instructions for management or distribution and completes any required recordings or institutional forms. Proper post-order steps include updating account registrations, recording deeds if necessary, and notifying beneficiaries about changes in asset control. Maintaining clear records of each post-order transaction and following the trust’s distribution schedule protects the trustee from later disputes. If the court’s order included specific conditions or accounting requirements, the trustee must comply accordingly. Finalizing the administrative tasks after the order ensures assets are handled according to the decedent’s documented intent and reduces the likelihood of future claims challenging the transfers.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas