A Heggstad petition is a legal action used when assets meant to fund a trust were never properly transferred during the settlor’s lifetime. In Empire and throughout Stanislaus County, a petition to the court can establish that certain assets should be treated as trust property despite the lack of formal transfer. If you are dealing with a trust that does not reflect intended asset ownership, or if a beneficiary is uncertain about title issues after a settlor’s passing, pursuing a Heggstad petition can clarify ownership and prevent long-term disputes about distribution and control of estate assets. Our office assists clients in assessing these situations and seeking clear legal resolution.
Navigating a Heggstad petition requires careful attention to trust documents, deeds, bank records, and sworn statements from parties familiar with the settlor’s intent. The petition asks the court to declare that particular property should be placed into an existing trust as if transferred, avoiding probate and honoring the settlor’s intent. This process may involve gathering witness declarations, reviewing beneficiary lists, and preparing supporting exhibits that demonstrate the settlor’s consistent intent to fund the trust. Timely action can prevent contested probate proceedings and reduce delays in estate administration, helping families secure the assets the settlor intended to protect.
Filing a Heggstad petition preserves the settlor’s plan by converting mistakenly retained assets into trust property, which protects beneficiaries from unnecessary probate and administration costs. By clarifying title, the petition can restore the trust’s intended distribution mechanisms and safeguard tax and creditor planning built into the original trust documents. In many cases, it resolves disputes without protracted litigation, promotes more efficient asset transfer, and maintains privacy for the family by avoiding open probate hearings. The petition also sends a clear message to institutions and title companies about how assets should be handled, supporting smoother estate administration overall.
Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provides estate planning services across California with a focus on practical solutions for trust and probate issues. We guide clients through Heggstad petitions by reviewing trust documents, assembling evidence of intent, and preparing petitions that present a clear factual and legal basis for the court to declare assets part of a trust. Our approach emphasizes thorough documentation, careful communication with beneficiaries and institutions, and steady management of procedural requirements so clients can pursue a prompt and stable resolution to title disputes and trust funding gaps.
A Heggstad petition operates where a trust exists but some assets remain titled in the settlor’s name because transfers were not completed. The petition asks the court to interpret the settlor’s intent and declare those assets should have been part of the trust. Typical evidence includes trust language, transfer instructions, correspondence, beneficiary expectations, and affidavits from persons with direct knowledge of the settlor’s intent. Success depends on proving intent by a preponderance of the evidence, and courts may weigh consistency of documents and surrounding circumstances to determine whether the property should be treated as trust assets.
When considering a Heggstad petition, it is important to gather all relevant financial records, deeds, account statements, and any written or oral instructions the settlor left about funding the trust. The petition must also identify interested parties and provide proper notice so they can respond. Courts often prefer solutions that honor the settlor’s documented intent and minimize unnecessary estate administration. Early evaluation of the facts can reveal whether a Heggstad petition or an alternative such as trust modification, corrective deeds, or probate avoidance tactics will best achieve the settlor’s goals and the beneficiaries’ interests.
A Heggstad petition is a declaratory action used to treat certain assets as trust property when formal transfer was never completed. Originating from a leading California decision, the petition seeks a judicial determination that the settlor intended particular property to be included in the trust, thereby avoiding probate for those assets. The court reviews documents and testimony to assess intent, and if convinced, will order the asset to be treated as trust property. This tool is particularly useful in cases where the settlor took many steps toward funding a trust but failed to finish title changes or account retitl ing before death or incapacity.
A successful Heggstad petition relies on several core elements: demonstrable settlor intent to fund the trust, evidence corroborating that intent, identification of the asset at issue, and proper notice to interested parties. The process typically starts with document review and evidence collection, followed by drafting the petition, serving notices, and filing with the appropriate probate department. The court may schedule hearing(s) where testimony and exhibits are considered. If the judge finds sufficient evidence, an order will declare the asset part of the trust, allowing trustees to manage and distribute it under trust terms without probate oversight.
Understanding common terms can make the Heggstad process less confusing. Terms like settlor, trustee, beneficiary, trust funding, title, affidavit, and declaration often appear in petitions and court records. These concepts relate to who created the trust, who controls it, who benefits from it, and how assets are meant to be owned. Familiarity with these terms helps clients follow the petition strategy, recognize what evidence is helpful, and participate meaningfully in hearings and communications with financial institutions and other interested parties throughout the proceeding.
The settlor is the person who creates a trust and outlines how assets should be managed and distributed under its terms. In the context of a Heggstad petition, the settlor’s documented intent and actions are central evidence for the court. Records such as the trust document, letters of instruction, conversations recorded in writing, and actions taken to fund the trust all help demonstrate what the settlor intended. Courts will look at the totality of the settlor’s conduct, not just a single document, to determine whether certain assets should be treated as trust property and avoid probate.
A trustee is the individual or institution appointed to hold and manage trust assets for the benefit of named beneficiaries. When a Heggstad petition is filed, the trustee often appears in proceedings to assert the trust’s rights or to request the court order that assets be treated as trust property. The trustee’s role includes presenting evidence of intent to fund the trust, managing assets after the court determination, and carrying out distributions according to the trust’s terms once title issues are resolved. Trustees have fiduciary duties to beneficiaries that guide their conduct in these matters.
A beneficiary is someone designated in a trust to receive benefits, income, or principal from trust assets. Beneficiaries may be directly affected by a Heggstad petition because the petition determines whether specific property will pass under the trust’s distribution terms. Beneficiaries may support or oppose a petition based on how they expect distributions to be handled, and courts will consider beneficiary rights when evaluating evidence of intent. Beneficiary interests are often central to the dispute resolution process, and their positions can influence whether a petition proceeds to hearing or is resolved by agreement.
Title refers to how ownership of an asset is legally recorded, and funding refers to the act of transferring assets into a trust. A Heggstad petition addresses discrepancies where title remains in the settlor’s name despite intent to fund a trust. To resolve this, courts examine documentation and circumstances showing attempts or intent to transfer ownership, such as retirement plan beneficiary designations, deeds, account paperwork, or correspondence instructing transfer. Establishing that property should be treated as trust property helps align legal title with the settlor’s plan and allows trustees to manage assets consistent with the trust terms.
When assets are not properly titled in a trust, a Heggstad petition is one of several options. Alternatives include corrective deeds, beneficiaries updating payable-on-death designations, trust modification petitions, or probate administration for assets that cannot be brought into the trust. The best path depends on the asset type, timing, willingness of institutions to cooperate, and evidence of intent. A Heggstad petition can be more suitable when documents and witnesses strongly support that the settlor intended the trust to own the asset but the formal transfer was not completed prior to death or incapacity.
In some situations, account records or beneficiary designations already reflect the settlor’s intent and financial institutions will update title or pay beneficiaries without court action. For instance, accounts with payable-on-death or transfer-on-death designations, or life insurance and retirement accounts with trust beneficiaries properly named, often do not require a Heggstad petition. When documentation aligns with the trust and institutions cooperate, a limited administrative approach can avoid court filings. This path relies on prompt communication, accurate records, and institutions’ internal processes to effect the desired transfers efficiently.
When all interested parties agree that certain assets belong to the trust and sign corrective documents, the issue may be resolved without involving the court. Agreements and corrective deeds executed by the necessary parties can often cure defects in funding if institutions accept the corrective paperwork. This cooperative resolution reduces time and cost for families and avoids public court records. However, written agreements must be carefully prepared and properly recorded to ensure that transfers comply with law and accurately reflect the settlor’s intended disposition of assets under the trust.
When witness statements, documents, or institutional records conflict about whether assets were meant to be in the trust, a comprehensive legal approach is often necessary. The court may need to weigh competing evidence and determine which version best reflects the settlor’s intent. Preparing a complete petition with supporting affidavits, documentary exhibits, and clear legal arguments helps ensure the court can make an informed decision. In these cases, a more formal process reduces the risk of later challenges and clarifies asset ownership for trustees and beneficiaries moving forward.
If banks, title companies, or other institutions decline to retitle assets or recognize trust ownership without a court order, pursuing a Heggstad petition becomes necessary to resolve the impasse. Likewise, when beneficiaries or heirs contest the transfer or question the settlor’s intent, litigation may be required to protect trust administration and implement the settlor’s wishes. In these circumstances, a comprehensive legal strategy ensures proper notice, adherence to procedural rules, and presentation of persuasive evidence so the court can settle disputed ownership once and for all.
A comprehensive approach focuses on documenting the settlor’s intent, assembling complete evidence, and addressing potential challenges early. This reduces the likelihood of prolonged disputes and enhances the chance of a court order that resolves title issues permanently. Detailed preparation can also streamline later trust administration by making transfers and distributions straightforward for trustees. With clear judicial guidance, beneficiaries and institutions have a firm basis for action, which helps reduce uncertainty and potential conflict during sensitive post-death or incapacity matters.
Comprehensive preparation protects family relationships by resolving disagreements through a neutral judicial determination rather than behind-the-scenes arguments or incomplete settlements. It can minimize administrative costs over time by preventing repeated challenges, and it preserves estate planning mechanisms designed to protect assets and beneficiaries. Moreover, a well-supported petition clarifies how specific assets fit into the trust plan, allowing trustees to manage assets consistent with the settlor’s directions and helping beneficiaries receive distributions as intended without additional litigation.
A primary benefit of pursuing a thorough petition is obtaining a judicial declaration that certain property is trust property, which clarifies title and eliminates ambiguity. Once the court issues such an order, trustees can act confidently to manage and distribute assets according to the trust, and institutions generally accept the court’s ruling as authoritative. This legal clarity reduces administrative friction, protects against later creditor claims based on alleged improper transfers, and helps settle beneficiary expectations about how and when distributions will occur under the trust terms.
By addressing title defects and potential contest issues through the court, a comprehensive petition greatly lowers the likelihood of future litigation among heirs and beneficiaries. A formal order makes it harder for parties to reopen the issue later, preserving estate plan integrity and preventing recurring legal expenses. The process also provides a formal record of the court’s findings and reasoning, which supports trustees in defending their actions and clarifies the settlor’s intentions for all stakeholders involved in estate administration.
Collecting deeds, bank statements, trust documents, and correspondence early improves the likelihood of a successful Heggstad petition. Evidence demonstrating the settlor’s repeated intent to fund the trust—such as instructions to advisors, copies of checks, or draft deeds—provides a stronger record for the court. Gathering witness declarations from family members or advisors who recall conversations about funding the trust also helps. Early collection reduces delays during the petition process and allows attorneys to assess whether a petition or a less formal remedy is the most efficient path to achieving the settlor’s goals.
Ensure all interested parties receive proper notice of the petition and encourage early discussions to explore resolution before a hearing. When beneficiaries and heirs understand the facts and the settlor’s documented intent, many disputes can be narrowed or resolved without costly trials. If disagreements remain, having well-prepared declarations and exhibits reduces the chance of surprise at hearing and supports a focused judicial evaluation. Early inclusion of parties also helps preserve family relationships by promoting transparency and reducing misunderstandings during the process.
Consider a Heggstad petition when important assets intended to fund a trust still show title in the settlor’s name and administrative attempts to correct title have failed or are contested. Additional reasons include conflicting estate records, banks refusing to retitle accounts without a court order, or heirs disputing whether an asset belonged to the trust. Filing a petition can secure the settlor’s original distribution plan, avoid probate for the affected assets, and provide a formal adjudication that simplifies trust administration and protects beneficiaries’ interests over the long term.
Other reasons to pursue a petition involve time-sensitive matters such as pending creditor claims, tax considerations, or the need to transfer property quickly to meet trust management requirements. If beneficiaries require access to funds or property that should have passed under trust terms, a judicial declaration can expedite management and distribution. Clients often seek a petition when they want certainty and finality, preventing repeated disputes and establishing a clear legal basis for trustees to exercise their responsibilities under the trust document.
Typical circumstances include incomplete deeds for real property, bank or brokerage accounts never retitled into the trust, retirement accounts with ambiguous beneficiary designations, and transfers that were intended but not finalized before incapacity or death. Often these scenarios arise because the settlor assumed transfers had occurred or relied on a professional who neglected a step. A Heggstad petition clarifies ownership in these situations by presenting evidence that the settlor intended the trust to own the asset even though formal transfer did not occur.
Real estate is frequently the subject of Heggstad petitions when deeds remain in the settlor’s name despite instructions to transfer to a trust. Banks and title companies typically require a clear court order or corrective deed to accept trust ownership, and a Heggstad petition can establish that the property should be treated as trust-held. The petition will present deeds, correspondence, and witness declarations that show the settlor intended the property to be part of the trust, so trustees can manage or transfer real property under trust terms without going through probate.
Accounts often remain in a settlor’s name due to oversight or misunderstanding about retitling procedures. When institutions refuse to transfer account ownership to the trustee, a Heggstad petition can ask the court to declare the accounts trust property based on the settlor’s intent. Supporting evidence may include account statements, instructions to financial advisors, and declarations from persons aware of the settlor’s plan. Once the court issues an order, trustees can direct distributions and manage accounts according to the trust without additional probate proceedings.
Life insurance policies, retirement plans, or other assets with beneficiary designations can create complexity when designations conflict with trust terms or were never updated. If the settlor intended the trust to receive those proceeds but the paperwork does not reflect it, a Heggstad petition can help resolve the discrepancy. The court evaluates evidence of intent, including beneficiary forms, correspondence, and other documentation, to determine whether the asset should be treated as trust property and distributed under the trust’s provisions.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman represents clients in Empire and nearby communities with focused attention to trust funding gaps and Heggstad petitions. We assist trustees, beneficiaries, and family members by reviewing records, preparing petitions, and coordinating service on interested parties. Our office handles communications with financial institutions and title companies and prepares the factual and legal records the court needs. We aim to resolve title disputes efficiently while preserving the settlor’s intent and minimizing disruption to the trust administration process for families and trustees.
Clients choose the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman because we provide focused legal guidance tailored to estate planning disputes, with practical experience handling trust title issues in California courts. We start by evaluating documents and options, then design a plan that addresses institutional requirements, beneficiary concerns, and court procedural rules so petitions proceed without unnecessary delay. Our goal is to present a compelling factual record that allows the court to honor the settlor’s intent and place the assets where the trust directs.
We work to communicate clearly with clients and interested parties, explaining likely outcomes and timelines so families can make informed decisions. When institutions require a court order, we prepare petitions with careful attention to evidentiary support, declarations, and exhibits that demonstrate the settlor’s consistent intent to fund the trust. That thorough preparation helps reduce the chance of contested hearings and promotes efficient adjudication of title disputes, allowing trustees and beneficiaries to proceed with trust administration.
Our office also coordinates administrative alternatives where appropriate, such as corrective deeds or beneficiary updates, to avoid court involvement when possible. When litigation is necessary to achieve a durable result, we pursue petitions that prioritize finality, clear title, and respect for the settlor’s wishes. Throughout the process, we emphasize practical solutions that minimize cost and emotional strain, helping families restore order and clarity to estate administration after an unsettling discovery about untransferred assets.
Our process begins with a thorough intake to collect trust documents, asset records, and any communications reflecting the settlor’s intent. We then evaluate whether a Heggstad petition is appropriate or whether administrative solutions could resolve the issue. If court action is required, we prepare the petition, gather witness declarations and exhibits, and ensure proper service on interested parties. We keep clients informed at each step and work to resolve matters efficiently, seeking orders that align title with the settlor’s original estate planning objectives and permit trustees to manage and distribute assets smoothly.
In the initial stage we review trust documents, deeds, account statements, beneficiary forms, and any correspondence that indicates the settlor’s intent to fund the trust. This review helps determine whether the facts support a Heggstad petition or a less formal remedy. We also identify interested parties and evaluate likely responses from financial institutions and title companies. A careful assessment at the outset reduces surprises later and allows us to anticipate evidence needs and possible objections, helping form a coherent strategy for resolving title issues.
Gathering evidence is central to any Heggstad petition. We seek drafts of trust documents, instructions to advisors, deeds, cancelled checks, emails, and affidavits from individuals who can attest to the settlor’s intent. Chronological records showing consistent intent to fund the trust strengthen the petition. This evidence is organized into exhibits that tell a coherent story for the court, demonstrating that the settlor intended certain assets to be trust property despite the absence of formal title changes.
Proper notice to beneficiaries, heirs, and other interested parties is required for court proceedings, so we prepare and serve notices that explain the petition and the parties’ rights. Identifying all potential interested persons and entities helps prevent delays caused by improper service and provides transparency that can encourage agreement. Timely and accurate notice also allows parties to review evidence, seek counsel, and participate meaningfully in the process, which can sometimes lead to negotiated resolutions before a hearing is necessary.
Once evidence is compiled and notices are prepared, we file the Heggstad petition with the appropriate probate department of the county court. The petition sets forth facts, attaches exhibits, and requests a judicial determination that specific assets are trust property. After filing, the court sets deadlines for responses and may schedule a hearing. We monitor filings, respond to objections if they arise, and work to resolve disputes through declarations, mediator discussions, or negotiated settlements where appropriate to avoid a contested trial when possible.
If interested parties object or require additional information, we manage discovery and prepare responsive declarations and supporting exhibits. This may include obtaining third-party records, preparing deposition summaries, or addressing factual disputes through sworn testimony. Careful management of discovery reduces the risk of ambush at hearing and allows us to present a comprehensive record to the court. Our focus is on presenting clear, credible evidence that supports a finding of the settlor’s intent to include the asset in the trust.
Many matters are resolved through settlement conferences or negotiated agreements prior to hearing. We pursue discussions with opposing parties and institutions to explore corrective deeds, account retitlings, or stipulations that achieve the settlor’s objectives without a contested hearing. If settlement is not possible, we prepare for court conferences and hearings by organizing exhibits, witness declarations, and hearing briefs that present a focused and persuasive case to the judge. The goal is resolution with the least possible disruption to the family and estate administration.
At hearing, the court reviews the submitted evidence and hears testimony to determine whether the asset should be treated as trust property. We present exhibits and witness declarations demonstrating the settlor’s intent, address opposing arguments, and request an order declaring the asset part of the trust. If the court grants the petition, it issues a decree that allows trustees to manage and distribute the asset under trust terms. After judgment, we assist with implementing the order, including recording deeds or providing the order to financial institutions as needed.
At the hearing, well-organized evidence is essential. We present documentary exhibits and witness declarations in a clear sequence that shows the settlor’s consistent intent to fund the trust. We explain to the court how the evidence supports a finding that the asset should have been transferred to the trust and address any procedural objections that may arise. A compelling presentation helps the judge reach a conclusion that aligns with the settlor’s wishes and provides the definitive legal basis trustees need to act.
After the court issues an order, we assist trustees in implementing the decision by providing certified copies to banks, title companies, and other institutions, and by recording necessary documents such as corrective deeds. This ensures that institutions accept the court’s ruling and update title or account ownership accordingly. We also advise trustees on any follow-up steps needed to administer the asset under the trust’s terms and to communicate with beneficiaries about distributions and management consistent with the court’s declaration.
A Heggstad petition is a court action asking a judge to declare that specific assets should be treated as trust property despite title remaining in the settlor’s name. It is used when the settlor intended to fund a trust but did not complete formal transfers before death or incapacity, leaving assets that would otherwise be subject to probate. The petition presents documents, witness declarations, and other evidence to show consistent intent to fund the trust and requests a judicial declaration aligning legal title with the settlor’s plan. This remedy is particularly useful when administrative corrections are not accepted by financial institutions or when interested parties disagree about the settlor’s intent. By obtaining a court order, trustees can avoid probate for the declared assets and proceed with management and distributions according to the trust terms. The petition focuses on demonstrating intent through a combination of documentary and testimonial evidence.
The timeline for a Heggstad petition varies depending on the complexity of the facts, the county court’s schedule, and whether interested parties contest the petition. Simple cases with cooperative institutions and uncontested evidence can resolve in a few months, while contested matters involving discovery or multiple hearings may take longer. Timeframes also depend on how quickly evidence can be gathered and whether settlement discussions narrow the issues before hearing. Court calendars, service deadlines, and potential objections all influence timing, so early document collection and prompt service of notices help move the matter forward. Engaging counsel early allows preparation of a strong initial petition, which can reduce delays by anticipating likely evidentiary and procedural challenges.
Key evidence for a Heggstad petition typically includes the trust document, deeds, bank statements, beneficiary designation forms, correspondence that reflects the settlor’s instructions, and affidavits from people who can attest to the settlor’s intent. Chronological records that show repeated direction to fund the trust strengthen a petition. Courts look for consistency between documents and the settlor’s demonstrated actions to conclude that title should be treated as trust property. Witness declarations from family members, advisors, or professionals who recall the settlor’s plan are often important. Records of attempts to transfer assets, draft deeds, or written instructions to financial institutions can further support the petition. The overall goal is to present a coherent factual narrative demonstrating the settlor’s intent to include the asset in the trust.
Yes. If the court grants a Heggstad petition, it can declare disputed assets to be trust property, allowing those assets to be administered and distributed under the trust rather than through probate. This judicial determination effectively shifts ownership for the assets in question and reduces the assets subject to probate administration, which can save time and expense and preserve the settlor’s plan for distribution. The declaration must be implemented by presenting the court order to relevant institutions, recording corrective deeds if necessary, and taking any steps required to effectuate the transfer under the trust terms. Once implemented, trustees can manage and distribute the property as the trust directs, subject to any remaining legal obligations or creditor claims addressed by the court.
Alternatives to a Heggstad petition include attempting administrative corrections such as corrective deeds, updating beneficiary designations, or using payable-on-death or transfer-on-death designations where permitted. If institutions accept corrective documentation, assets may be retitled without court involvement. Trust modification or reformation actions may also address certain issues when appropriate, depending on consent and legal standards. However, when institutions refuse to retitle assets or interested parties disagree, a Heggstad petition provides a judicial route to resolve title disputes. Choosing the best option depends on the asset type, available evidence, and whether interested parties and institutions are willing to cooperate with corrective measures.
Financial institutions commonly accept a court order from a Heggstad petition as authoritative proof that certain assets should be treated as trust property. Once the court issues a declaration, banks, title companies, and retirement plan administrators generally update their records or distribute funds in accordance with the order. Presenting certified copies of the judgment and any required supporting documents helps ensure institutions follow the court’s directive. Some institutions may require additional documentation or recording of deeds before completing changes, so coordination is often necessary to implement the order. Assistance in preparing the necessary paperwork and delivering certified court documents to institutions helps ensure a smooth transition of title and account ownership.
Costs for filing a Heggstad petition vary based on the complexity of the case, the need for discovery or contested hearings, court filing fees, and the level of preparation required to gather evidence. Simple, uncontested matters have lower costs, while contested petitions involving depositions, expert reports, extensive discovery, or trial preparation will be more expensive. Geographic differences in attorney and court costs also affect the total. Early assessment and targeted preparation can reduce expenses by eliminating unnecessary steps and focusing on dispositive evidence. Exploring administrative remedies first, when feasible, may save money compared to full litigation. Discussing likely cost ranges and strategies up front helps clients plan and decide whether a petition or an alternative route is the most appropriate.
Beneficiaries can contest a Heggstad petition if they believe the settlor did not intend the asset to be part of the trust or if they dispute the factual record. Contests require filing objections and presenting contrary evidence for the court to consider. When disputes arise, courts evaluate the credibility and consistency of competing evidence to determine the settlor’s intent and whether the asset should be treated as trust property. Because contests can prolong resolution and increase costs, many cases benefit from early settlement efforts or mediation. Preparing a clear factual record and engaging in transparent communication with interested parties can sometimes reduce contested litigation and lead to agreed outcomes that reflect the settlor’s documented wishes.
After a Heggstad petition is granted, trustees should promptly obtain certified copies of the court order and present them to financial institutions, title companies, and any other entities that need to update records or transfer title. Trustees may need to record corrective deeds, change account registrations, or request distribution instructions consistent with the court’s declaration. These implementation steps ensure the paper trail aligns with the judicial determination and supports trustee actions under the trust terms. Trustees should also communicate with beneficiaries to explain the court’s decision and the next steps for administration and distribution. Maintaining clear records of actions taken in reliance on the court order helps protect trustees from future disputes and demonstrates compliance with fiduciary responsibilities while completing the trust administration process.
Families preparing to support a Heggstad petition should collect all relevant documents and identify witnesses who can attest to the settlor’s intent. Useful materials include the original trust document, drafts, deeds, account statements, beneficiary forms, emails, letters, and notes reflecting discussions about funding the trust. Chronologically organized records that show consistent direction to include assets in the trust will strengthen the petition and clarify the settlor’s plan. It also helps to gather contact information for advisors, witnesses, and institutions involved with the assets. Preparing clear declarations from witnesses who recall the settlor’s instructions and preserving documentary evidence early reduces delays and improves the ability to present a persuasive case to the court, increasing the likelihood of a favorable outcome.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas