A Heggstad Petition provides a way to confirm that assets should be treated as part of a trust when those assets remain titled in the decedent’s name after death. At the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman, we assist clients in Turlock and throughout Stanislaus County with the legal steps necessary to establish that a decedent intended property to be held in trust. This page explains what a Heggstad Petition is, when it is used, and how the process typically unfolds. If you are dealing with trust administration and untitled assets, understanding this petition can help you preserve the settlor’s plan and minimize delays in administering the estate.
Many families encounter situations where a trust document exists but certain assets were never retitled into the trust before the settlor’s death. A Heggstad Petition asks the court to recognize those assets as trust property based on the settlor’s intent and surrounding circumstances. This guide outlines the legal framework, common evidence presented, and steps a family member or trustee might take to pursue the petition in Stanislaus County courts. We also cover alternative options and the practical benefits of resolving untitled assets through the appropriate legal procedure so that property is administered according to the decedent’s estate planning goals.
Filing a Heggstad Petition can be an effective path to ensure that assets the decedent intended to place in a trust are actually treated as trust property, which helps avoid full probate when successful. The petition focuses on evidence of intent, including trust documents, declarations, communications, and actions taken by the deceased. When accepted by the court, the Heggstad Petition can simplify property transfers, reduce costs and delays compared with formal probate, and allow trustees to manage and distribute trust assets consistent with the settlor’s plan. For families and fiduciaries, resolving title issues through this legal mechanism often preserves both financial value and the decedent’s wishes.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provide practical guidance to clients facing trust administration matters, including Heggstad Petitions, trust modifications, and related estate planning needs. Our approach combines careful document review with focused preparation of the materials and declarations needed to present the court with a clear record of intent. We work with trustees, family members, and personal representatives to identify relevant evidence, prepare pleadings, and navigate local court procedures in Stanislaus County and surrounding jurisdictions. Our goal is to resolve title uncertainties efficiently and respectfully while protecting the legal and financial interests of beneficiaries.
A Heggstad Petition asks the court to declare that property held in a decedent’s name should be treated as trust property based on the decedent’s intent and surrounding facts. The petition often arises when a trust exists but assets were left titled to the individual rather than transferred into the trust before death. Courts review evidence such as the trust document, transfer attempts, beneficiary lists, declarations, and behavior showing intent to fund the trust. This process allows trustees to gain clear authority over property, proceed with trust administration, and avoid the longer timelines of full probate court procedures when appropriate.
Heggstad Petitions require attention to both substantive law and local procedures. Filing typically involves preparing a petition, supporting declarations, and documentary evidence that show how the decedent treated the property and intended it to be administered. The court then evaluates whether the estate plan and facts support treating the asset as trust property. In some cases, opposing parties may contest the petition, so careful fact-gathering and sound legal argument are important. For trustees and beneficiaries, a successful Heggstad Petition can simplify administration, preserve privacy, and ensure assets are distributed as the decedent intended.
A Heggstad Petition is a probate court request to recognize that specific property, though still titled in the decedent’s name, should be treated as belonging to the decedent’s trust. It is used when the trust instrument itself indicates a clear intent that certain property be governed by the trust, but formal transfer into the trust did not occur. The petition explains the legal basis and provides evidence of intent, seeking a judicial declaration to confirm trustee authority. This remedy helps close gaps between the trust plan and the actual legal title to property, facilitating proper trust administration and distribution to beneficiaries.
Successful Heggstad petitions typically rest on clear documentation and consistent actions by the decedent indicating that assets were intended to be part of the trust. Relevant elements include the trust document itself, statements or letters of intent, transfer records, beneficiary designations, and testimony from witnesses or those who handled the decedent’s affairs. The process usually begins with an inventory of possibly untitled assets, preparation of the petition and supporting declarations, and filing in probate court. A hearing may be scheduled where the judge reviews the evidence before issuing an order that clarifies ownership for trust administration purposes.
Understanding the language used in trust and probate matters helps trustees and family members make informed decisions. This glossary defines common terms you will encounter when dealing with Heggstad Petitions and trust administration. Familiarity with these terms—such as trustor, trustee, probate, and declarations of intent—can make the petition process smoother and support better communication with counsel and the court. The definitions below are written for clarity for clients in Turlock and surrounding areas who are navigating post-death asset transfer issues.
A trustor, also called a settlor, is the person who creates a trust and places assets into it during life or by will. This individual sets the terms for how assets are to be managed and eventually distributed to beneficiaries. When a trustor dies, the trust’s provisions govern the administration and distribution of trust assets by the trustee. In Heggstad matters, courts look to the trustor’s actions and declared intent to determine whether assets that remain titled in the trustor’s name should be treated as trust property for purposes of administration and distribution.
A trustee is the person or institution appointed to manage trust assets and carry out the terms of the trust according to the trustor’s instructions. The trustee has fiduciary duties to the beneficiaries, including duties of loyalty and prudence in managing assets. After a trustor’s death, the trustee handles trust administration tasks such as collecting assets, paying obligations, and distributing property to beneficiaries. A Heggstad Petition often seeks a judicial declaration that certain assets are trust property so the trustee can properly assume control and complete administration without unnecessary delays.
Probate is the court-supervised process for settling a decedent’s estate when assets are titled in the decedent’s individual name and no effective trust or transfer mechanism governs those assets. Probate involves validating a will if one exists, appointing a personal representative, and distributing assets according to the will or intestacy rules. Because probate can involve public records, time delays, and court costs, many estate plans use trusts to avoid probate. Heggstad Petitions can sometimes prevent the need for full probate by demonstrating that assets were intended to be part of a trust.
A declaration of intent includes written statements, contemporaneous actions, and other evidence showing that the trustor intended certain assets to be governed by the trust. Documents such as trust provisions, letters to advisors, bank or real estate transfer attempts, and witness testimony can all support a claim that property should be treated as trust assets. In a Heggstad Petition, the court evaluates this body of evidence to determine whether the trustor’s intent is clear enough to transfer legal title for administrative purposes and to allow the trustee to act on those assets.
When untitled assets remain in a decedent’s name, family members and fiduciaries have several options depending on the circumstances: pursue a Heggstad Petition, open probate, use small estate procedures if eligible, or seek agreement among beneficiaries for a transfer. Each route has trade-offs. Probate is more formal and public but resolves title broadly. A Heggstad Petition can be faster and preserve privacy if the court is satisfied by the evidence. Small estate processes may be available for lower-value assets. Choosing the right approach depends on the asset type, available proof of intent, potential conflicts, and timing needs.
A limited approach can be suitable when the assets in question are low in value or when all beneficiaries agree on the disposition. If the estate qualifies for informal transfer procedures under local law, or if family members provide written assent, a quick administrative transfer may avoid the time and expense of formal court filings. In such cases, trustees or personal representatives can gather necessary documentation and complete transfers without full probate. It remains important to document actions carefully to prevent future disputes and to ensure transfers conform to the trustor’s expressed wishes.
When written evidence explicitly demonstrates that the decedent treated an asset as trust property, the trustee may be able to proceed without a contested court action. Records such as signed trust instruments, transfer forms, directed communications to financial institutions, or contemporaneous instructions can provide a basis for administrative transfer. Working with financial institutions to accept such documentation may resolve the issue without a formal petition. Even so, securing confirmatory court orders through a Heggstad Petition can provide greater legal certainty in cases where institutions are reluctant to change title.
A comprehensive approach should be considered when beneficiaries or potential heirs dispute whether certain assets were intended to be in the trust, or when title issues are complex. In contested situations, evidence may need to be gathered and presented formally, and the court may require hearings. A complete legal strategy covers factual investigation, preparation of declarations, negotiation with opposing parties, and courtroom representation if necessary. This thorough process protects the trustee’s authority and the interests of beneficiaries by building a robust record supporting the requested judicial declaration.
Complex assets such as real property, retirement accounts, or assets located in multiple jurisdictions can require a fuller legal approach. These matters often involve interacting with financial institutions, tax considerations, and differing state rules, which can complicate straightforward transfers. A comprehensive plan includes identifying the legal framework applicable to each asset, coordinating with custodians or title companies, and ensuring that transfers comply with trustee duties and tax obligations. Addressing these layers early reduces the risk of unintended consequences during trust administration.
A comprehensive approach to resolving untitled assets seeks to produce a clear legal record that supports treating assets as trust property, which can prevent future disputes and simplify distribution. By collecting relevant documentation, preparing detailed declarations, and, where needed, filing a Heggstad Petition, trustees can obtain a court order that clarifies ownership and provides authority to manage or transfer property. This reduces uncertainty during administration and helps ensure beneficiaries receive their intended distributions in an orderly manner while protecting fiduciary duties and minimizing later challenges.
Comprehensive handling also helps preserve privacy and efficiency compared with full probate when the court grants the requested relief. A well-supported petition can avoid broader probate administration, limiting public exposure of estate details. The thorough documentation created during the process helps trustees meet legal obligations and can be used to respond to creditor claims or tax inquiries. Ultimately, investing in a careful legal process helps protect the legacy left by the trustor and provides beneficiaries with a smoother path to receiving their share of trust assets.
Taking a comprehensive approach can substantially reduce delays by securing court confirmation that assets belong to the trust sooner in the administration timeline. When the court finds the evidence persuasive, trustees gain clear authority to act, avoiding prolonged title disputes or requests for additional information from financial institutions. This efficiency helps beneficiaries access assets and reduces carrying costs associated with unresolved property. By addressing potential obstacles proactively, trustees can move forward with distributions and management in a way that honors the trust’s terms and the trustor’s intentions.
A comprehensive record and court order confirming trust ownership provide stronger protection for trustees administering assets and for beneficiaries receiving distributions. Such confirmation reduces the likelihood of later challenges and helps demonstrate that the trustee acted responsibly in carrying out the trust’s terms. Clear documentation also assists in responding to creditors or tax authorities and in coordinating with third parties such as title companies. Overall, the thorough approach seeks to preserve value and minimize the risk of post-administration disputes over assets or distributions.
Begin by collecting all documents that indicate the decedent’s intent for the asset to be part of the trust: trust agreements, letters, emails, transfer forms, and statements to advisors. Documents showing consistent treatment of property with the trust’s terms will be persuasive. Also collect any records of attempts to retitle property into the trust, and gather contact information for witnesses who can attest to the trustor’s intent. Organized documentation streamlines petition preparation and helps the court evaluate the facts without unnecessary delay or follow-up requests.
Throughout the process, keep a careful record of communications, decisions, and actions taken by the trustee or family members. Written logs, copies of correspondence, and clear notes about conversations with professionals and institutions help establish a transparent record. These materials can be valuable both for the Heggstad Petition and for subsequent trust administration steps. Clear record-keeping helps protect the trustee against disputes and provides beneficiaries with confidence that the property is being handled in accordance with the trustor’s intentions.
If a trust exists but certain assets remain titled in the decedent’s name, a Heggstad Petition may be the appropriate method to align legal title with the trustor’s plan. Consider this service when you want to avoid formal probate, when evidence supports the trustor’s intent, or when financial institutions require a court determination before transferring property. The petition can help trustees act with authority and protect beneficiaries by creating a clear pathway for administration. Early consideration of this option can prevent delays or disputes down the road as the trust is settled.
You should also consider a Heggstad Petition when attempting administrative transfers has been unsuccessful or when institutions demand judicial confirmation. In matters involving real property, retirement accounts, or assets with title complications, the court’s declaration can provide definitive resolution. If beneficiaries agree and the evidence is strong, this service creates a formal record that supports trustee actions and reduces the risk of future litigation. Engaging with legal counsel early helps assess the strength of the available proof and to determine the most efficient route to resolution.
Typical circumstances prompting a Heggstad Petition include when the trustor created a living trust but failed to retitle real property or financial accounts, when a pour-over will references the trust but assets were not transferred, or when transfer attempts were incomplete at the time of death. Other scenarios involve accounts titled jointly or in the decedent’s name only, or when custodians refuse to accept trust documents without a court order. These cases often arise at the start of trust administration when trustees discover assets that need legal clarification to be administered according to the trust document.
A common circumstance is real estate that remains titled solely in the decedent’s name despite a trust indicating the property should be part of the trust. Because title companies and county records often require a court order to change ownership after death, a Heggstad Petition can provide the judicial declaration necessary to retitle the property into the trust. Establishing the trustor’s intent and providing documentation of trust provisions and related actions helps the court determine whether the property should be treated as trust-owned for administration and eventual distribution.
Financial accounts that remain in the decedent’s name can create obstacles for trustees attempting to manage and distribute assets under the trust. Some institutions will accept a trust document and required forms; others insist upon a court order to change ownership or release funds. A Heggstad Petition can be used to demonstrate that such accounts were intended to be trust property, enabling trustees to obtain access and manage those assets for beneficiaries. Clear documentation and declarations are often necessary to satisfy account custodians and the court.
Over time, property ownership can be complicated by life events such as refinancing, changes in marital status, or overlooked retitling after creating a trust. When transfers were planned but not completed, trustees may find assets in the decedent’s name that the trustor clearly intended to include in the trust. A Heggstad Petition helps correct that gap by asking the court to recognize the intent reflected in the trust and supporting documents. Addressing these matters restores alignment between legal title and the trustor’s wishes for ownership and distribution.
If you are handling trust administration or dealing with untitled property in Turlock, the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman can help you evaluate whether a Heggstad Petition is appropriate and guide you through the filing process. We assist trustees and family members with document review, gathering evidence of intent, preparing the petition, and navigating local court procedures. Call 408-528-2827 for an initial discussion about your situation. Our goal is to provide clear explanations and pragmatic steps to help you move forward with trust administration and property transfer matters.
At the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman, clients benefit from focused attention to the facts and documentation that underlie a successful petition. We work to assemble the records and declarations that communicate the trustor’s intent effectively to the court and to third parties. Our practice emphasizes clear communication with trustees and beneficiaries to ensure everyone understands the proposed actions and the likely timeline. For matters in Stanislaus County, we are familiar with local court protocols and seek efficient paths to obtaining the necessary orders for trust administration.
We approach each matter by assessing the available evidence and explaining the likely outcomes and alternatives to our clients. If a Heggstad Petition is advisable, we prepare a thorough petition and supporting declarations tailored to the facts at hand. When needed, we coordinate with title companies, banks, and other custodians to facilitate transfers following a court determination. Our focus remains on practical solutions that honor the trustor’s plan while protecting the rights of trustees and beneficiaries throughout the legal process.
Every estate and trust situation is different, so we take time to listen, identify priorities, and outline a transparent plan with estimated timelines and next steps. Whether you are seeking a court declaration to retitle real property, obtain access to financial accounts, or clarify other asset ownership issues, we offer personalized guidance and representation that addresses the unique facts of your case. Reach out to discuss your situation and to learn how a Heggstad Petition might help you move forward with trust administration.
Our process for Heggstad Petitions begins with a detailed review of trust documents and potential untitled assets, followed by gathering relevant evidence such as communications, transfer attempts, and witness statements. We then prepare the petition and supporting declarations tailored to local court requirements, file the petition in the appropriate probate court, and respond to any inquiries or oppositions that arise. Where possible, we work to resolve matters by agreement to reduce time and expense, but we are prepared to present the case at hearing if the court requires judicial determination to confirm ownership for trust administration.
The initial phase involves careful review of the trust document and related records, identification of untitled assets, and collection of supporting evidence. We request and organize trust instruments, deeds, account statements, correspondence, and any written statements of intent. Witness information and affidavits can also be critical. This preparatory work forms the foundation for the petition and helps determine whether a Heggstad Petition is the most appropriate path compared with other legal options.
We examine the trust to find language demonstrating the trustor’s intent for particular assets and review any attached schedules or exhibits. Documents showing the trustor’s consistent intention to include specific property are particularly important. We also look for prior attempts to retitle assets that can support the petition. Having a clear understanding of the trust’s terms helps tailor the petition to present the most persuasive explanation for why title should be treated as trust property.
Gathering declarations from those who witnessed the trustor’s actions or who handled financial affairs provides the court with context about the trustor’s intent. Affidavits describing conversations, transfer attempts, and the trustor’s expressed wishes strengthen the factual record. We assist in preparing these declarations, ensuring they address the specific legal standards applied by the probate court. Strong, clear witness statements can make the difference in persuading the court to grant the requested declaration.
After assembling evidence, we draft the Heggstad Petition and supporting papers in compliance with local rules and filing requirements. The petition sets out the facts, the legal basis for treating the asset as trust property, and the requested court order. We submit the documents to the probate court, serve interested parties as required, and monitor the filing through the court docket. Proper drafting and adherence to procedure maximizes the petition’s clarity and readiness for judicial review.
The petition lays out the facts, cites legal authority, and links the documentary evidence to the claimed intent to include the asset in the trust. We frame the argument to address potential questions a judge may have about intent and transfer attempts. Clear, well-organized exhibits and declarations make it easier for the court to evaluate the matter efficiently. Preparing a persuasive, procedural-compliant petition reduces the likelihood of delays or requests for additional information from the court.
Once the petition and exhibits are complete, the next step is filing with the appropriate probate court and ensuring all interested parties receive proper notice. Timely service and accurate filing prevent procedural objections and help the matter move forward. We handle court coordination, track deadlines, and respond to any procedural inquiries. If beneficiaries or potential heirs raise concerns, we address them professionally to facilitate resolution and reduce the risk of contested proceedings where possible.
If the court schedules a hearing on the petition, we present the factual record and legal arguments to support the requested declaration. The judge reviews the evidence and determines whether the asset should be treated as trust property. If the court grants the petition, we assist with implementing the order, coordinating with title companies and financial institutions to transfer or retitle assets as necessary. If the petition is contested, we prepare for hearings to ensure the trustee’s position is fully represented and to seek a favorable outcome.
At the hearing, emphasis is placed on showing the court a clear chain of facts and documents that establish the trustor’s intent. We present declarations and exhibits, explain why the evidence supports treating the asset as trust property, and respond to questions from the judge or opposing parties. Effective presentation helps the court reach a reasoned decision. Our focus during hearings is to achieve a determination that enables the trustee to manage and distribute assets in line with the trust’s provisions.
After a favorable order, the practical work involves retitling assets, updating records, and notifying relevant institutions of the court’s decision. We coordinate with title companies and account custodians to complete the necessary paperwork and ensure transfers comply with the court order. If additional steps are required for tax or reporting purposes, we advise on next actions. The objective is to complete trust administration with minimal further interruption and to provide beneficiaries with clear documentation of the completed process.
A Heggstad Petition is a probate court filing that asks the court to declare that property titled in the decedent’s name should be treated as part of a trust based on evidence of the decedent’s intent. This petition is useful when a trust exists but assets were never formally retitled before death, and a judicial declaration will help the trustee administer those assets under the trust’s terms. The petition explains the factual background and attaches documents supporting the claim that the decedent intended the asset to be held by the trust. Pursuing a Heggstad Petition may be appropriate when administrative efforts to transfer title have been unsuccessful or when institutions require a court order. The petition seeks clarity and authority for the trustee, aiming to avoid full probate if the court agrees the evidence supports trust ownership. Preparing a strong factual record and carefully presenting the case to the court improves the likelihood of obtaining the needed declaration.
Courts look for evidence that the decedent intended the asset to be part of the trust. Judges consider the trust document itself, any language indicating the asset was to be included, and actions taken by the decedent such as attempted transfers or communications with advisors. Declarations from witnesses who observed the decedent’s intent and contemporaneous documents that corroborate the trustor’s wishes are important. The court evaluates whether the totality of the evidence supports treating the property as trust-owned. The standard of proof may vary with the jurisdiction and the nature of the asset, and judges weigh the credibility and consistency of the evidence presented. Clear documentary proof and consistent actions by the decedent weigh heavily in favor of a finding that the asset belongs to the trust, while conflicting evidence or missing documentation can make the outcome less certain.
Most persuasive evidence includes the trust document with explicit terms about the property, written attempts to transfer the asset into the trust, correspondence or notes by the trustor referencing the transfer, and declarations from witnesses who can attest to the trustor’s intent. Official records like deeds, account statements showing transfer efforts, and communications with advisors or institutions can strengthen the petition. The court seeks a coherent factual narrative that explains why the property should be treated as trust property. Beyond documents, affidavits from those who handled the trustor’s affairs or who discussed the trust with the decedent often provide context. Evidence that demonstrates a consistent and ongoing plan to include the asset in the trust is typically more convincing than isolated statements made long before death.
Yes, beneficiaries, heirs, or other interested parties can contest a Heggstad Petition. Contests may arise when parties disagree about the trustor’s intent or when competing claims to the asset exist. If a party opposes the petition, the court will consider evidence from both sides, and hearings may be scheduled to resolve disputed facts. Clear, organized documentation and credible witness declarations help the petitioner respond to objections and present a persuasive case to the judge. When contests occur, it is often helpful to pursue negotiation or mediation if parties are willing, as that can reduce time and expense. However, if disputes cannot be resolved informally, the court process will determine ownership based on the evidence and applicable law, and the trustee should be prepared to justify the petitioned outcome.
The timeline for a Heggstad Petition varies based on the complexity of the facts, court schedules, and whether the petition is contested. Simple cases with clear documentation may proceed more quickly, sometimes within a few months from filing to resolution, while contested matters or those requiring additional evidence can take significantly longer. Local probate court calendars and procedural requirements also influence timing, and delays may occur if additional discovery or testimony is needed. Early preparation and complete documentation can shorten the process by reducing the need for follow-up from the court. Prompt service on interested parties and responsiveness to court requests improve case momentum. Consulting about expected timelines in Stanislaus County helps set realistic expectations for trustees and beneficiaries navigating the process.
Filing a petition in probate court does create public court records, which can expose some details about the estate or trust administration. However, a Heggstad Petition is often narrower in scope than full probate and can be limited to matters necessary to resolve ownership of specific assets. Depending on the filing and local court practices, some filings may include sensitive attachments, so it is important to consider privacy when preparing documents and to discuss options for sealing records with counsel if appropriate. In contrast, avoiding full probate by resolving title issues through a petition and court order can still limit the overall public disclosure compared with a prolonged probate administration. Trustees should balance the need for judicial confirmation with privacy considerations and tailor filings to include only necessary information while complying with court requirements.
Alternatives to a Heggstad Petition include informal administrative transfers when beneficiaries agree and institutions will accept trust documents, small estate procedures if asset values fall within statutory limits, or opening a probate estate to clear title. In some cases, direct negotiation with banks, title companies, or other custodians can lead to voluntary transfer based on documentation and beneficiary consents. These options may be faster and less costly for straightforward matters with no dispute among interested parties. However, when institutions require judicial confirmation or when parties contest ownership, a Heggstad Petition may be the most reliable way to obtain a clear legal determination. Assessing the available evidence and the likelihood of institutional cooperation helps decide which route is most appropriate for a given asset or situation.
If the court denies a Heggstad Petition, the petitioner may need to consider alternative routes to clear title, such as opening probate to administer the asset through that process, or pursuing additional evidence or legal theories that better support trust ownership. A denial may reflect insufficient evidence of intent or procedural issues in the petition. In such cases, careful review of the court’s reasoning guides decisions about next steps and whether further action can remedy the deficiencies identified by the judge. Even after denial, the trustee should evaluate options for resolving the asset’s status, which could include negotiation with interested parties or pursuing other legal remedies available under state law. Consulting about the implications of the court’s decision helps determine the most efficient path forward for beneficiaries and fiduciaries.
Costs for pursuing a Heggstad Petition vary depending on case complexity, court filing fees, the need for witness declarations or expert documentation, and whether the matter is contested. Simple petitions with clear documentation and cooperative parties incur lower costs, while contested matters and hearings naturally increase time and expense. Additional costs can include fees for obtaining records, title searches, and coordination with financial institutions. It is helpful to obtain an initial assessment to estimate likely expenses based on the specific facts of the matter. Legal counsel can often provide a scoped plan and fee estimate for the petition process. Discussing expected costs and potential alternatives early helps trustees and families weigh the financial aspects of pursuing a petition versus other options for resolving untitled assets.
To get started, gather all trust documents, deeds, account statements, and any communications that show the decedent’s intention regarding the assets in question. Make a list of assets that remain titled in the decedent’s name and note any prior efforts to transfer them into the trust. Contact the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman or similar counsel to schedule an initial consultation to review these materials and discuss the best path forward for your situation. During an initial meeting, counsel will assess whether a Heggstad Petition is likely to succeed based on the available evidence and local court practices. From there, a plan can be developed to gather additional proof, prepare the petition, and undertake the necessary filings or alternative actions tailored to your needs and goals.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas