A Heggstad petition can be a critical tool for trustees and beneficiaries when assets intended to fund a trust were never properly transferred into the trust during the settlor’s lifetime. In Weaverville and throughout Trinity County, navigating the legal procedures and evidentiary requirements of a Heggstad petition requires careful preparation of documents, witness statements, and a clear explanation of the settlor’s intent. Our page explains what a Heggstad petition is, who may file, and what court filings and supporting records are typically needed to ask a probate court to recognize trust ownership of previously titled assets.
When assets remain in the name of a deceased person rather than the trust, beneficiaries and trustees may face delays, frozen accounts, and difficulty administering the estate under the trust’s terms. A Heggstad petition asks the court to confirm that certain assets should be treated as trust property based on the settlor’s intent and available evidence. This process can restore the trust’s intended functioning and streamline distribution to beneficiaries. Below we outline common scenarios, procedural steps, and practical tips to prepare an effective petition in California’s probate system.
A successful Heggstad petition resolves ownership questions without prolonged probate for assets that the settlor intended to place in a trust. This remedy protects beneficiaries’ interests, prevents unnecessary estate administration costs, and helps trustees carry out the trust terms as originally planned. Filing a petition can enable quicker access to accounts, avoid duplicate estate planning distributions, and provide clear legal authority for the trustee to manage or transfer assets. In many cases, it restores the settlor’s intentions and reduces friction among family members who may disagree about asset ownership or the proper administration path.
Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman serves clients across California with attention to thorough estate planning and post-mortem trust administration. Our approach to handling Heggstad petitions focuses on careful document review, factual development to show the settlor’s intent, and clear court filings that present records, affidavits, and trial declarations in a persuasive manner. We work with trustees, beneficiaries, and family members to assemble deeds, account statements, trust documents, and witness attestations that support a claim that particular assets were meant to be part of the trust but were not formally retitled prior to death.
A Heggstad petition is a type of probate court action in California that asks the court to treat certain assets as if they had been transferred into a trust during the settlor’s lifetime. The petition typically demands evidence showing the settlor’s intent to fund the trust with the asset, such as trust terms, beneficiary designations, transfer documents, or consistent estate planning behavior. The petitioner must compile records and testimony that convince a judge that the asset should be administered according to the trust instead of under a will or intestacy rules.
California courts will consider a variety of evidence when evaluating a Heggstad petition, including the trust instrument, contemporaneous writings, statements by the settlor, title documents, and actions taken to transfer property. The goal is to align legal ownership with the settlor’s demonstrated intent. Because the procedure touches on probate rules, beneficiary rights, and trust administration, careful legal and factual preparation is essential. Parties should expect to gather records, communicate with financial institutions, and, where needed, present witness statements that verify the settlor’s plans and conduct.
A Heggstad petition is rooted in California case law and probate statutes that allow courts to recognize trust ownership where title was not formally transferred. The petition asks the court to declare that certain property belongs to the trust based on the settlor’s intent and available documentation. Courts evaluate the totality of circumstances to determine whether the settlor intended the asset to fund the trust, which can include written trust provisions, trustee actions, beneficiary expectations, and the settlor’s own conduct. The objective is to prevent administrative inefficiencies and respect estate planning objectives despite clerical or procedural lapses.
Preparing a Heggstad petition involves assembling a clear factual record, supporting documents, and declarations that reflect the settlor’s intent. Key elements include the original trust document, any amendments, related deeds or account statements, beneficiary designations, and correspondence indicating the settlor’s plan. Trustees must identify the assets at issue, explain why they were not retitled, and present evidence such as witness declarations or financial institution responses. The petition filing will include proposed orders, a notice plan to interested parties, and careful legal arguments referencing California probate rules and relevant case law.
Understanding common terms assists trustees and beneficiaries as they navigate a Heggstad petition. This glossary section provides plain-language explanations of legal and administrative words used in trust and probate contexts, helping readers make sense of filings, notices, trustee authority, and types of evidence. Having a clear grasp of these terms makes it easier to communicate with courts, financial institutions, and family members during the petition process. Below are concise definitions to clarify frequent concepts encountered in trust administration and contested asset transfers.
The term settlor refers to the person who created the trust and established its terms and intended distributions. In the context of a Heggstad petition, the settlor’s intent is the central focus: courts examine the settlor’s actions and contemporaneous documentation to decide whether specific assets should be treated as trust property. Evidence may include the trust instrument, communications about the trust, or actions that indicate the settlor intended the trust to control particular assets. The settlor’s expressed plans and conduct form the foundation for a petition seeking to align title with those intentions.
A trustee is the individual or entity appointed to manage the trust assets and carry out the terms set by the settlor. When a Heggstad petition is filed, the trustee is often the petitioner seeking court acknowledgment that certain assets belong to the trust so the trustee can administer them accordingly. Trustees must act in beneficiaries’ interests and provide a factual record to courts demonstrating why the assets should be treated as trust property, ensuring proper documentation and following applicable legal procedures to effectuate distribution or management under the trust terms.
A beneficiary is anyone named in a trust to receive assets or benefits under the trust’s provisions. Beneficiaries have legal interests that can be affected when assets remain titled outside the trust, prompting potential petitions to clarify ownership. In a Heggstad petition proceeding, beneficiaries may be notified, may object, or may support a trustee’s petition that seeks to bring assets under trust administration. The court evaluates how recognition of trust ownership serves the grantor’s intents and beneficiaries’ rights while considering evidence and objections.
Probate is the court-supervised process to distribute assets of a decedent under a will or when there is no will, while trust administration is the management and distribution of trust assets according to the trust document, often without court involvement. A Heggstad petition bridges these two processes by asking the probate court to recognize certain assets as trust property so those assets can be managed through trust administration rather than probate. This clarification can reduce delays, avoid duplicate distributions, and align asset handling with the settlor’s documented plan.
When assets are not titled in a trust, interested parties face several possible paths: full probate administration, a streamlined small estate procedure where applicable, or a Heggstad petition asking the court to treat assets as trust property. Each path has different timelines, costs, and evidence requirements. Probate is formal and public, while a Heggstad petition aims to confirm trust ownership and allow private trust administration. Choosing the appropriate route depends on asset values, the clarity of the settlor’s intent, the number of interested parties, and whether quick access to funds is needed for estate obligations.
A limited court approach may work when the settlor left clear written evidence that certain assets were intended for the trust, such as explicit trust provisions, draft deeds, labeled account paperwork, or correspondence showing intent to fund the trust. If documentation and witness statements create a convincing record that the asset belonged to the trust, a concise petition supported by those materials can often secure a favorable ruling without full probate administration. This path can save time and reduce administrative burdens for trustees seeking to honor the settlor’s plans.
When the assets at issue are modest in value and beneficiaries agree on trust administration, a focused petition can be efficient. Cooperative parties who provide declarations, relevant account statements, and consent facilitate a smoother proceeding. Courts tend to be responsive to straightforward matters where documentation supports the trust claim and there are few disputes. This scenario is suitable for avoiding extensive probate steps and minimizing delay, provided the factual record and interested party notices comply with California probate procedures.
Complex histories, missing documentation, or conflicting records increase the likelihood of contested proceedings and require a comprehensive legal approach. In such situations, careful investigation, collection of ancillary records, and development of credible witness declarations become vital. The court will scrutinize the totality of evidence, and resolving contradictory documentation may involve tracing transactions, communicating with financial institutions, and preparing legal analyses that demonstrate the settlor’s intent. A thorough approach anticipates objections and presents a well-organized factual narrative to the court to reduce the risk of delays or adverse rulings.
Disputes among beneficiaries, heirs, or trustees often require a comprehensive plan to address competing claims and legal arguments. Courts will weigh objections, competing evidence, and statutory obligations, so it is important to prepare legal strategies that include negotiation, transparent disclosures, and readiness for contested hearings. A robust approach includes formal notices, potential settlement efforts, and carefully drafted pleadings that respect notice requirements and provide the court with a complete factual and legal record to support recognition of trust ownership where appropriate.
A comprehensive approach reduces the risk of contested delays, preserves the settlor’s intent, and promotes efficient trust administration once the court recognizes the assets as trust property. By assembling complete documentation, addressing potential objections early, and presenting a cohesive factual narrative, trustees can minimize disputes and avoid subsequent litigation over distributions. Thorough preparation often leads to clearer court orders, smoother interactions with financial institutions, and more timely access to funds needed for creditors, taxes, and beneficiary distributions under the trust terms.
Additionally, comprehensive filings help protect trustees from later challenges by producing an evidentiary record that supports the trustee’s decisions and actions. Well-documented petitions that include witness declarations, contemporaneous documents, and institutional records provide courts with a reliable basis to rule in favor of trust administration. This method reduces uncertainty for beneficiaries, provides transparency, and promotes finality in administration, which can prevent protracted disputes and the costs associated with extended probate litigation.
Investing time up front to compile a thorough petition can reduce lengthy court battles later, leading to faster resolution and savings in legal and administrative expenses. Courts prefer clear records and reasoned legal arguments; when a petition presents a complete factual narrative supported by documents and declarations, judges can make informed rulings without extensive discovery or repeated hearings. Fewer contested issues translate into lower overall costs and more predictable timelines for distributing trust assets to beneficiaries according to the settlor’s wishes.
A comprehensive record provides trustees with a defensible basis for their administration decisions, reducing exposure to claims of improper handling of assets. When the court issues an order recognizing trust ownership based on a well-supported petition, trustees gain clearer authority to manage, transfer, or distribute the assets under the trust document. This legal protection helps prevent future challenges and supports orderly fulfillment of fiduciary duties, creating a more stable pathway for concluding the trust administration process.
Begin by collecting every relevant document that can demonstrate the settlor’s intent to fund the trust, including the trust instrument, amendments, deeds, bank statements, beneficiary designations, and correspondence indicating planning steps. Provide clear copies of account statements, transaction histories, and any draft deeds or transfer forms. Early document gathering makes it easier to identify gaps, obtain necessary witness declarations, and reduce the likelihood of surprise objections. Preparing a comprehensive file before filing a petition streamlines the court filing process and strengthens your factual presentation.
Contact banks, title companies, and account custodians to obtain records, statements, and institutional responses about why assets were not retitled before death. Some institutions can provide documentation that clarifies account ownership history or internal transfer attempts. These records are often crucial to establish the timeline of events and show that the settlor intended for a transfer to occur. Establishing a line of communication early may also reveal procedural remedies or forms that can accelerate resolution without extended litigation.
Consider a Heggstad petition when assets that should fund a trust remain in the decedent’s individual name and the trust terms would otherwise direct administration of those assets. This situation commonly arises from oversight, incomplete transfers, or administrative lapses. Filing a petition can clarify title, allow the trustee to follow the trust terms, and avoid duplicative probate steps. If timely access to funds is needed for estate obligations or distributions, the petition can be an efficient legal vehicle to realign asset ownership with the settlor’s plan and expedite trust administration.
You should also weigh a petition when beneficiaries or trustees prefer private trust administration instead of public probate, or when the total value of affected assets justifies seeking court recognition to reduce long-term costs. If documentation and witness statements exist to support the settlor’s intent, a petition is often appropriate. Conversely, if no evidence supports trust funding or if significant disputes among interested parties exist, other legal routes or negotiated settlements may be necessary, so careful assessment of records and relationships is important before filing.
Typical circumstances include title issues where real estate deeds were not recorded in the trust name, retirement or brokerage accounts still titled in the decedent’s name, or assets that were intended to be transferred but paperwork remained incomplete. Other triggers include newly discovered trust documents, inconsistent beneficiary designations, or administrative oversights by advisors. Family discussions, draft transfer instruments, and account records often shed light on these matters. Identifying the specific factual pattern helps determine whether a Heggstad petition is the right procedural step.
Real property intended to fund a trust often becomes the subject of a Heggstad petition when deeds were not executed or recorded before the settlor’s death. Conveyancing delays, confusion about title procedures, or reliance on future transfer instruments can leave real estate in the decedent’s name. A petition can ask the court to declare that the property was intended to be trust-owned and to authorize the trustee to manage, sell, or transfer the property under the trust’s terms. Supporting evidence typically includes trust provisions, draft deeds, and witness testimony.
Bank, brokerage, or retirement accounts that were supposed to be retitled into the trust but remain in the decedent’s name are frequent subjects of Heggstad petitions. Institutions may freeze access pending probate, which delays payments and distributions. Petitions supported by account statements, transfer attempts, and related communications can persuade a court to treat those accounts as trust property. Establishing the settlor’s intent to fund the trust and providing bank records often resolves ownership questions and allows the trustee to proceed with administration.
Assets accompanied by inconsistent or conflicting documents require careful factual reconstruction before court action. For example, a trust amendment might identify certain assets for the trust while title records still show individual ownership. In such cases, compiling contemporaneous notes, correspondence, account histories, and witness statements is essential to clarify the settlor’s plan. A Heggstad petition presents these materials to the court and asks for a judgment that aligns legal title with the settlor’s demonstrated intent, thereby enabling trust-based administration.
If you are dealing with assets left outside a trust in Weaverville or Trinity County, our firm can help evaluate records, prepare petitions, and communicate with interested parties and institutions. We assist trustees and beneficiaries in gathering evidence, drafting witness declarations, and filing court documents needed to request recognition of trust ownership. While each case has unique facts, our goal is to provide clear guidance on the legal options, anticipated timelines, and probable outcomes so you can make informed decisions about proceeding with a petition or pursuing alternative remedies.
Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provides careful legal representation for trustees and beneficiaries who need to clarify asset ownership and proceed with trust administration. We focus on developing a complete evidentiary record that supports a petition, coordinating with financial institutions, and ensuring required notices are properly delivered to interested parties. Our approach emphasizes clarity, responsiveness, and thorough preparation of filings to present the facts and legal arguments necessary to obtain court orders recognizing trust ownership when appropriate.
Clients benefit from practical guidance on evidence collection, an organized approach to filing, and clear communication throughout the probate process. We help trustees understand their duties and options, and we advise beneficiaries on expected timelines and procedural steps. By anticipating potential objections and addressing them early in the process, we strive to reduce conflict and achieve timely resolution. Our firm’s goal is to facilitate orderly trust administration consistent with the settlor’s intent while protecting the interests of all involved parties.
Because Heggstad petitions involve both factual and procedural considerations, we work to prepare a compelling and well-documented petition that the court can evaluate efficiently. This includes coordinating declarations, gathering institutional records, drafting proposed orders, and managing notices to interested persons. We also explore alternatives where appropriate, such as negotiated agreements or administrative transfers, to find the most practical path for resolving ownership issues and enabling trust-based management and distribution of assets under the settlor’s plan.
Our typical process begins with a detailed review of the trust document, related estate planning records, and the title or account records for the assets at issue. We identify evidence that supports funding the trust and develop a petition plan that includes witness declarations, institutional records, and proposed court orders. We prepare required notices, file the petition with the court, and manage communications with interested parties and financial institutions. If objections arise, we evaluate settlement options and prepare responses or hearing materials to protect the trust’s administration.
The first step is to evaluate all available documents and facts regarding the assets at issue and the settlor’s intent. This includes reviewing the trust instrument, deeds, account statements, beneficiary designations, and any planning communications. We identify gaps and recommend steps to obtain missing records, such as contacting banks for transaction histories or requesting certified copies of deeds. A thorough initial assessment establishes the scope of evidence needed and the most effective petition strategy to present to the court.
We examine the trust document, amendments, and related estate planning records to determine how the settlor intended assets to be held and distributed. This review clarifies which assets should belong to the trust and whether any language supports retroactive recognition of ownership. We also check for pour-over wills, powers of attorney, and other instruments that shed light on the settlor’s overall plan. Understanding these documents is essential to framing the legal argument for the petition and identifying supporting evidence.
Next we compile title records, account statements, deeds, and beneficiary forms to identify which assets remain outside the trust. We look for draft transfer documents, attempted retitling actions, and any institutional correspondence that indicates intent to transfer. This step often involves requesting records from financial institutions and county recorder offices. Having a complete asset inventory with supporting documents enables us to craft a focused petition addressing each item and presenting a logical narrative to the court.
After gathering records, we prepare the formal petition, declarations, and proposed orders required by the probate court. Declarations from trustees, witnesses, and sometimes institutional representatives document the settlor’s intent and actions taken to fund the trust. We also draft clear explanations of why the court should recognize trust ownership and suggest precise orders for the court to enter. Attention to detail in drafting helps ensure compliance with local court rules and provides judges with a coherent record for decision-making.
Proper notice to beneficiaries, heirs, creditors, and other interested persons is essential in probate proceedings. We prepare and serve all required notices in accordance with California rules and local court practices, ensuring that interested parties receive the petition documents and have an opportunity to respond. Clear notice reduces later procedural challenges and helps the court proceed efficiently. We also coordinate with opposing parties if settlement discussions are a possibility prior to hearings.
Once the petition and supporting materials are assembled, we file with the appropriate probate court and manage subsequent communication and scheduling. This includes responding to court inquiries, addressing any initial objections, and preparing for hearings if required. We monitor court timelines and provide clients with updates so they understand next steps. Efficient court communication and adherence to local procedures help move the matter toward a timely resolution and minimize administrative delays.
If the court grants the Heggstad petition, we assist in implementing the order so that assets are administered under the trust. This can include providing the court order to financial institutions, retitling accounts, recording deeds, and ensuring distributions occur according to the trust terms. If the petition is contested, we support settlement negotiations or trial preparation. Regardless of outcome, we advise trustees on required follow-up actions to complete trust administration in alignment with the court’s ruling and the trust document.
After obtaining an order recognizing trust ownership, we work with banks, title companies, and other custodians to effectuate transfers, update account registrations, and record deeds when necessary. This coordination ensures that the court’s ruling produces practical results, such as releasing funds for estate obligations or enabling trustee-managed distributions. Clear instruction letters and certified orders help institutions complete administrative steps, and we follow up to confirm transfers are properly recorded and processed.
Following recognition of trust ownership, trustees may need to complete final accounting, pay debts and taxes, and distribute assets in accordance with the trust. We assist in preparing accountings where required, notifying beneficiaries of distributions, and resolving any outstanding administrative matters. Our role includes ensuring compliance with statutory timelines and trust provisions so that administration concludes smoothly, documentation is preserved, and trustees can provide beneficiaries with transparent records of actions taken under the trust.
A Heggstad petition is a probate court filing requesting that the court recognize specific assets as having been owned by a trust despite formal title remaining in the decedent’s name. The petition relies on evidence demonstrating the settlor’s intent to fund the trust, such as the trust document, supplementary writings, transfer attempts, or witness accounts. The court reviews the totality of the evidence and may issue an order declaring the assets to be trust property for administration under the trust terms. This remedy is used when retitling was not completed prior to death, yet the settlor clearly intended the asset to be held in the trust. It is distinct from full probate since the goal is to bring specific assets under trust administration rather than open an estate proceeding for all assets. The process involves the trustee assembling records and declarations, filing the petition, providing notice to interested parties, and, if necessary, addressing objections in court hearings.
Typically, the trustee named in the trust files a Heggstad petition seeking court recognition of the trust’s ownership of specific assets. In some cases, beneficiaries with an interest in proper trust administration may initiate proceedings to protect their rights, especially when a trustee is absent or unable to act. The petitioner must have standing by showing a direct interest in having the asset treated as trust property so that it can be administered according to the trust provisions. Filing parties should ensure they provide adequate notice to all interested persons, including beneficiaries and potential heirs, so they have an opportunity to object. Courts are careful about procedural requirements and will consider objections from anyone with a legitimate interest. Proper service and transparent disclosures reduce procedural challenges and support a smoother path to resolving ownership questions.
Courts look for objective evidence that the settlor intended the asset to be part of the trust. This evidence commonly includes the original trust document, relevant amendments, correspondence with advisors, draft or executed deeds, bank account statements showing intended transfers, and record of attempted retitling. Witness declarations recounting the settlor’s statements and actions can also support the claim by corroborating documentary evidence and providing context about planning steps taken before death. Institutional records from financial institutions or title companies can be particularly persuasive when they reflect transfer attempts or communications about retitling. A well-organized petition presents a narrative supported by documents and sworn declarations that collectively demonstrate the settlor’s plan. The stronger and more consistent the evidence, the more likely a court will recognize the asset as trust property.
Timing varies depending on the complexity of the assets, the court’s calendar, and whether interested parties contest the petition. For straightforward matters with clear documentation and cooperative beneficiaries, courts may resolve petitions relatively quickly after required notices and a brief hearing. More complex or contested cases can take several months to reach resolution due to additional discovery, hearings, or settlement negotiations. Preparation time before filing can also affect the overall timeline. Gathering institutional records, drafting declarations, and serving interested parties take time but can prevent delays later. Early and careful preparation combined with responsive communication to the court and other parties generally leads to a more efficient process and reduces the likelihood of extended litigation.
Yes, Heggstad petitions are commonly used for both real property and financial accounts when those assets were intended for the trust but remain in the decedent’s name. For real estate, supporting evidence might include draft deeds, trust provisions identifying the property, and witness statements about the settlor’s intent to transfer. For bank or brokerage accounts, account statements, beneficiary designation forms, and institutional communications that reference intended transfers are often relevant. Each asset type requires documentation tailored to its nature. Deeds and recorder’s office records are crucial for real property, while account histories and institutional responses are essential for financial accounts. A petition should clearly identify each asset, present the supporting evidence, and request specific orders to enable the trustee to retitle or manage the property under the trust once the court rules.
Common objections include disputes over the settlor’s true intent, conflicting documentation that suggests the asset should pass under a will or by intestacy, or claims that proper transfer procedures were not attempted. Interested parties may also assert that the trustee lacks authority or that procedural notice was defective. Responding to objections requires careful factual development, clarifying documents, and legal argument that explains why the court should recognize the trust’s claim based on the evidence. Addressing objections can involve producing additional records, obtaining corroborating declarations, and negotiating with opposing parties to narrow contested issues. Courts will weigh the credibility of evidence and may allow limited discovery or hearings to resolve disputed facts. Presenting a comprehensive evidentiary record and addressing potential procedural deficiencies early reduces the likelihood of adverse rulings or prolonged disputes.
Yes, beneficiaries and other interested persons must generally be notified of the petition so they have an opportunity to review the materials and respond. Proper notice is a core part of probate procedures, and failure to serve interested parties correctly can result in delays or the need to reissue service. Notified parties may support the petition, remain neutral, or file objections if they believe the asset should not be treated as trust property. Transparent notice and early communication with beneficiaries often reduce disputes and create opportunities for resolution without contested hearings. When beneficiaries understand the basis for the petition and see supporting documentation, they are more likely to cooperate with administration. If objections arise, the court will consider the arguments and evidence presented by all parties before issuing an order on the petition.
Alternatives include pursuing a formal probate administration for the affected assets, negotiating private settlements among interested parties, or using small estate procedures if the value and circumstances qualify. In some cases, financial institutions might allow administrative retitling based on internal policies and a court order short of a contested hearing. Each alternative has trade-offs related to cost, timing, and transparency, so it is important to assess which option best aligns with the settlor’s intentions and the beneficiaries’ needs. Negotiated resolutions can be efficient when parties agree, but they require cooperation and clear documentation to ensure finality. Small estate procedures are limited by value thresholds and statutory requirements. Considering these alternatives early can help determine whether filing a Heggstad petition or choosing a different path will achieve the most practical and timely outcome for trust administration.
A Heggstad petition typically focuses on ownership recognition rather than altering the tax consequences of transfers, but court orders that place assets in a trust for administration can affect how those assets are reported and handled for estate tax or income tax purposes. Trustees should coordinate with tax advisors to understand any reporting obligations and ensure that filings reflect the court’s order. Creditor claims should be addressed according to probate statutes, and recognition of trust ownership does not eliminate legitimate creditor rights that must be satisfied under California law. If estate tax or creditor exposure is anticipated, the trustee should consider the timing of petition filing and seek guidance on whether additional notices or procedures are necessary to protect the estate and trust. Courts may require satisfaction of specific statutory steps to ensure that creditor rights are preserved while allowing trust administration to proceed for recognized assets.
Trustees who discover assets were not retitled should immediately inventory the assets, preserve records, and notify beneficiaries about the situation. Gathering the trust document, any draft transfer instruments, account statements, deeds, and correspondence with advisors or institutions is the foundational step. Proper documentation will be needed to evaluate whether a Heggstad petition is appropriate and to prepare the factual record the court will examine if petitioning for recognition of trust ownership. It is also important to contact relevant financial institutions and title authorities to request transaction histories and to determine whether administrative options to effectuate transfers exist. Trustees should avoid unilateral transfers without court authority in contested situations and instead proceed by assessing the legal route that best protects beneficiary interests and complies with California probate procedures.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas